calendar icon May 2, 2024

Minneapolis Marathon Runner Comments

Back to Minneapolis Marathon Information & Reviews

Course Rating Course 4.1 
 
Oranization Rating Organization 4.4 
 
Spectator Rating Spectators 3.8 
 
 
Number of comments: 76 [displaying comments 71 to 76]
More Comments: [ < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > ]

 

J. L. from Duluth, MN, USA (6/1/2009)
"Loved it! 5/31/09" (about: 2009)

11-50 previous marathons | 1 Minneapolis Marathon
COURSE: 4  ORGANIZATION: 4  FANS: 5


I took the bus down from Duluth for this marathon, lucked out by having a friend who lives less than a mile from the start/finish, and we had awesome weather. I was doing so well with my time that I decided to back off and relax for about 4 miles and just walk it - which I am glad I did because a comfortable run through the finish line felt great. Of course, the reason why this event was so good was because it was kept small and not a lot of people know about it (yet) - we had a lot of people cheering us on though!

My only gripes were these (and they are petty, but to me they're important): shirts, finisher jackets and medals had no date on them. Sorry, but I want to look back at my finisher stuff and be able to say, in 10-20 years, "Oh yea, that was the '09 race, etc." What I ended up doing was, rather than getting my time engraved on the back of the medal, getting "05/31/2009" engraved. I know this is the first annual, but most people want to remember the date of their event, particularly if this is their first marathon.

Another thing is the finisher's shirt. Jackets are nice, but marathons and finisher shirts just go together better. I can understand an October race with a finisher jacket, but a shirt (one that isn't the same one for the 5K, half and full marathon!) is a must-have. I joined the Facebook group, and loved that the coordinator of this marathon communicated with me personally - that level of personalization is unseen today in fitness events. As much as I love this event (and time of year), I can see this being one of the biggest marathons in Minnesota by 2019. We shall see. Other runners were "okay" - not overly friendly, but everyone had iPods on too.
 

N. J. from Minneapolis, MN (6/1/2009)
"Good inaugural race... needs some improvements" (about: 2009)

3 previous marathons | 1 Minneapolis Marathon
COURSE: 3  ORGANIZATION: 4  FANS: 3


I did the half-marathon. Pros: Great scenery. Easy parking. Great shirt. Cons: Water in plastic cups (hard to crease and drink). HILLS, HILLS, HILLS. Mile 1 didn't seem to be marked right (about 20 Garmins all beeped 150 yards before the marker). The first mile had 2 sharp left turns, which slowed the field too much and had people bumping into each other. One street had large cobblestones, which had the runners jumping to the sidewalk to avoid turning ankles, knees, etc. Crowds were okay in places, and VERY thin in others.
 

N. S. from Hopkins, MN (6/1/2009)
"smart race!" (about: 2009)

11-50 previous marathons
COURSE: 4  ORGANIZATION: 4  FANS: 3


Having run a number of smaller marathons, a lot of organizers could learn from this marathon. In this race they used Minneapolis' resources perfectly. Take existing bicycle/running trails, on an out-and-back course with almost no intersections, and beautiful views of the Mississippi River, Downtown Minneapolis, Fort Snelling and Minnehaha Park, during a great time of year in which to be out running, and you have a winner every time! Even though there were not tons of volunteers, the ones that were there were knowledgeable and helpful. Because the course is out-and-back, the same water stops could be used twice. The spectator crowds were not large, but they made up for this with lots of enthusiasm. Nice medal and finisher's jacket, although in the future I would probably put all of the resources together (the food, jacket and porta-johns were spread out over a few block area). If you do not require a "big" marathon and just like to run, this is a great event.
 

R. M. from Michigan (6/1/2009)
"Minneapolis Marathon - Needs Work!" (about: 2009)

11-50 previous marathons | 1 Minneapolis Marathon
COURSE: 4  ORGANIZATION: 2  FANS: 4


It was the inaugural marathon, and with that being said... IMPROVEMENTS need to be made (in my opinion)!

Well, the course was very scenic and I thought it was a nice but challenging course. That hill coming up to 26 was BRUTAL!!! I did not like all the cottonwood fuzzies out on the trail either (however the region is in a drought this year)! I would give the course a 4.5 out of 5 stars. Pretty cool running along the Mississippi!

The expo for a race of this size was PITIFUL, in my opinion! Plus, I found the workers to be rather rude. Not very convenient for runners who come in late or do the whirlwind running (come in the night of and leave right after the race). I give the expo a 2.5 out of 5 stars.

Organization (which I link to the expo as well) was not all that good! For example, where was the course info at the expo? I also think the finish area (after the finish line) SUCKED! Water was nasty and warm, and they only had cups. I think water bottles from a water company could have been a nice amenity! Not much food; the bagels were stale, though the cookies were good. They could have used a bigger area for the grub and water!

MEDICAL SUPPORT was horrible. People were going down left and right, and I did not see one single ambulance on the course. I saw three people go down at the finish line, and the only people who helped them were (what appeared to be) family members/friends! Overall organization gets 1.5 out of 5 stars.

Now, onto the jacket. Well, it is nice and all... but it is summer, and a tech T-shirt would have been nice as well! Actually, I would have rather had the shirt! I'm not overly impressed with the goodies for a marathon of this size!

HEED IS THE MOST GODAWFUL, NASTY, VILE CRAP ever invented! One sip of that, and I nearly vomited! PowerAde or Gatorade would be a much wiser choice for next year!

I have run races as small as 15 people and had a much better overall experience. I have run races such as NYC and Chicago and had GREAT experiences. I have run everything in between the small and large and had better experiences! But to end on a good note, the course itself was really scenic and well laid out!
 

J. T. from Minneapolis, MN (5/31/2009)
"Team Ortho does it again!!" (about: 2009)

4-5 previous marathons | 1 Minneapolis Marathon
COURSE: 4  ORGANIZATION: 5  FANS: 5


This race had a scenic, mostly flat course; fantastic support from Team Ortho; water stops every mile; an awesome medal and finisher's jacket; and a cheap entry fee. Lots of hotel rooms in the Twin Cities! I had a PB here and qualified for Boston. The only reason I gave the course a 4 was due to some very narrow/congested trails at about the midway point. Other than that, this marathon rocked!
 

E. L. from Minneapolis (3/12/2009)
"Scenic race in Downtown Minneapolis." (about: 2008)

11-50 previous marathons | 1 Minneapolis Marathon
COURSE: 5  ORGANIZATION: 5  FANS: 3


I thought the 2008 version was very well organized and executed. Runners were treated to great views of Downtown Minneapolis and of the Mississippi River. Fun to cross the river and finish at the host hotel as well. I would for sure recommend this race to others.
 

More Comments: [ < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > ]


Become an Advertiser

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Become an Advertiser