Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

May 13, 2024

California International Marathon Runner Comments

Back to California International Marathon Information & Reviews

Course 4.4

Organization 4.3

Spectators 4.2

Number of comments: 231 [displaying comments 171 to 181]

More Comments: [ < 1 .. 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 > ]

E. W. from Monterey Park, CA (12/5/2006) "Great Marathon, but Not Easy!" (about: 2006) 11-50 previous marathons \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was my 18th marathon, and first CIM. The weather was cold but perfect for running. I don't know where people get the idea of a "fast" course from. Although it is a negative elevation gain, it was rolling hills the whole way, and I found this course to be one of my more difficult runs (and no training didn't help matters, either). The water stops with the volunteers were wonderful and the crowd support great. Having wide open streets with fall colors was nice. Overall, it was an enjoyable marathon (if you can call any marathon enjoyable)! Definitely worth doing once.
Steven Kramer from Pebble Beach California (12/4/2006) "Great Race Day" (about: 2006) 11-50 previous marathons \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 5 This is my 15th marathon and my first here. The route is great on the legs and the spectators were teriffic. Passing through the small towns reminded me of Boston! Some good food at he finish would be my only suggestion.
T. L. from Santa Clarita, CA (12/4/2006) "Good marathon, but could use some fine tuning" (about: 2006) 11-50 previous marathons \| 2 California International Marathons COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 Expo is well organized and convenient. Packet pickup was fairly easy, though it was confusing to have to leave the expo to get shirts and goody bags and then return to continue shopping. Bus pick-up was smooth and fast. Glad the buses were at all the listed hotels. Start line was fairly well planned, and though the porta-potty lines were long (as usual), it was nice to be able to wait on the buses (though the lungfuls of exhaust were not nice). Good course. I have to say the 5:30 pacer meant well but was incompetent. We went out in a sub-12 minute pace and the pace should have been 12:36. At 3 miles we were at 35 minutes and I dropped back, knowing I'd already gone out too fast. Course is nice and rolling, though I wish it were on the river parkway rather than on Fair Oaks Blvd. Finish line was NOT good. They ran out of medals again. I walked a mile back from the hotel to find out that they'd been out of medals for awhile and hadn't told us. It's not a big deal for me, as this was my 17th marathon, but for the first-time completers, I'm sure it was a big disappointment. I'll probably be back, but I won't trust a pacer again for a while. Again, not such a big deal for an experienced marathoner, but going out at that pace could be disastrous for a first-time racer.
R. G. from Danville, CA (12/4/2006) "Perfect run on a perfect day" (about: 2006) 6-10 previous marathons \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 After running away from the CIM weather reputation to various southern marathons for the last three years, I ran the local CIM for the first time this year and it was a perfect run on a perfect weather day. Temperatures in the low 40's at the start with no wind or clouds led to ideal conditions. Smashed my PR by 9 minutes running with one of MANY pace groups. The course has rollers throughout the first half, but that keeps the legs fresh and none of the climbs are of any significance. Crowd support not on par with the big boys, but there were loud pockets of support scattered through the course and in particular at the relay exchanges. Great design made for a beautiful finisher's medal. Separate finish lines for men and women are a nice touch too. Finish line was well organized with massages, hot soup, food, and sweats all available within yards of the finish.
H. C. from Emeryville, CA (12/4/2006) "Rolling Hills, Flat Finish" (about: 2006) 3 previous marathons \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 5 Net downhill course has quite a few rolling hills for the first 2/3 of the course, but none are that steep or long. After a short hill, it was encouraging to see long stretches of declines. Most of my training was done on completely flat terrain, so my quads did get quite tired and sore during the marathon. Cold (32F) at the start, but the sun warmed things up throughout the day to about 55F. Bus ride to start was well organized and is must for all runners. Bit more crowded throughout run than expected - didn't really thin out till mile 14/15. Wish the water stations were closer to mile markers, but at least they were plentiful. The small towns and scenery were nice. And spectators were great - best of the three marathons that I have run (LA, SF, CIM). Finish was really well done, and the spectators lining the way into the capitol building were energetic. Bag pick-up and food locations were a little hard to find. But food at finish line was good: Clif Bars/recovery drinks, two kinds of soup (lentil and tomato), apples, bananas, bagels, and Starbucks Gingerbread Lattes. Good course to run for a fast time. Was hoping to finish in 3:30, but instead finished in 3:43. Still lowered my PR by 40 minutes.
Jonathan Bischke from Los Angeles, CA (12/4/2006) "Highly enjoyable race" (about: 2006) 4-5 previous marathons \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 5 My brother and I completed the California International Marathon yesterday and highly enjoyed the experience. The weather was beautiful, the fans were enthusiastic and the course was interesting. It's definitely a course that you can run a fast time on, especially if you don't mind rolling hills. The only things that could be improved for the race would be a few more porta-potties at the start (lines were pretty long and resulted in us starting a few minutes after the gun went off) and better food at the finish (loved the tomato soup but there wasn't much else to enjoy). Otherwise, everything about the race was good and I'd definitely recommend it to anyone interested in running a small but enjoyable marathon.
Min-gyu Clark Kim from Davis, CA, USA (2/6/2006) "Fantastic" (about: 2005) 1 previous marathon \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was my very first marathon in my life and I just loved it. This marathon actually inspired me to become a better runner and since this event, I have been training intensively. The course was mostly downhill and very scenic. What surprised me was the spectators and volunteers. They were there to cheer you in that early chilly morning. I really thank their effort in spite of weekend morning sleepover. As for the organization, I can't really compare with others yet, because this was my first marathon. However, there were plenty of water stations and porta-potties and so forth. And yeah, the medal at the finish line was beautiful. Well, overall I loved it and yes, I am running next year - with intensive preparation to make the Boston Marathon!
RJ Lott from Richland, Washington (1/26/2006) "Marathon is set up for a fast time!" (about: 2006) 2 previous marathons \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 Definitely do this race for a very quick time! There is plenty of room to run on the wide streets and the frequent aid stations and spectators will keep you going! Just be careful of the weather. It can be quite cool at the start (near freezing). The days leading up to the race in 2006 were quite cold, rainy and windy! Also watch out for the fast start. It would be very wise to stick with one of the excellent pacers the entire route.
k. m. from Central Valley CA (1/4/2006) "Good race but not great" (about: 2005) 11-50 previous marathons \| 3 California International Marathons COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 4 This was my third run of CIM and admittedly a mistake was made on my part - promised to help a slower run acheive a PR. That said, there seems to be an attitude of "if you ain't fast - you ain't nothing" by many race organizers, not limited to CIM. Pacing to finish at 5:45 found that many of the water stations were closed well before the cut-off (many volunteers were apologizing), the trucks picking up equipment were darting in and around runners - and worst of all - there was very, very little support at the finish and no medals. The reason given? "More people than expected." Oh my gosh! How, after 24 years of putting on a race, can you run short of medals? We did receive in the mail a medal only three weeks later - that was impressive and responsive - but this race is going to be in trouble when folks catch on to the Sac Cowtown Marathon held the first weekend of October when the weather is more predictable.
K. B. from Kodiak, Alaska (1/4/2006) "Perfect Boston Qualifier" (about: 2005) 3 previous marathons \| 1 California International Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 This was my fourth marathon, and my goal was to qualify for Boston. I ran with the 3:15 pace group to meet my required time. The pace group was excellent; we were within 2-3 seconds of our pace at every mile for most of the race and ran a slightly negative split. Chip time 3:13:58, gun time 3:14:20 - 30 minutes faster than my best time. Weather worked out perfectly; cool/cold at the start (mid-30s) and warming up slightly (42); no wind. Fast point-to-point course with some small/short rolling hills.

More Comments: [ < 1 .. 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 > ]

Quick Links

Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools

Become an Advertiser

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Become an Advertiser

© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC

Privacy Policy Refund Policy Terms of Use