Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Apr 30, 2024

Windermere Marathon Runner Comments

Back to Windermere Marathon Information & Reviews

Course 4.1

Organization 3.2

Spectators 2.8

Number of comments: 40 [displaying comments 21 to 31]

More Comments: [ < 1 2 3 4 > ]

C. A. from Otis Orchards WA (6/13/2011) "Great race" (about: 2011) 4-5 previous marathons COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 Loved the course. Plentiful aid stations, very nice finishers medal and abundant post race food. No complaints. Thanks for a great marathon.
R. K. from Spokane Valley (5/29/2011) "Consider this race...Fast Course" (about: 2011) 11-50 previous marathons \| 2 Windermere Marathons COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 The race was much better organized than last year. The race started on time and the distance issue from last year was fixed. The weather was hot (60 at the start and mid 70's at the finish) and there was a strong tail wind, but there were plenty of add stations. Also the course looses 150+ ft of elevation with only a minor climb. The spectators are sparse but encouraging. Also the run along the river is nice.
K. G. from Missoula, Montana (5/22/2011) "Loved the trail along the river" (about: 2011) 4-5 previous marathons \| 1 Windermere Marathon COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 It's been a little over a week since finishing the 2011 version of this race. Despite having a bummer of a race personally I really like this course and would recommend the race to anyone looking for a nice pretty flat course. I also have to say the RD's did a great job with picking host hotels. The hotel provided a shuttle to the race transportation in the morning starting bright and early at 5:30 and they were at the finish line to help bring us back...even though it was less than 1/2 a mile a way to walk, it felt like a God send to take that shuttle. The aid stations were well stocked and had great helpful volunteers, I especially liked the Hawaiian themed station that was around mile 22-23. It was a good distraction at that time. My only suggestion for future aid stations is to have water and Heed on the same sides or front-back of stations through each station so you could go right to the one you wanted. There aren't a lot of spectators along the course but the ones that were there were very supportive. Personally I'm more concerned about the scenery along the way and that was beautiful along the river. The finishers medals are very cool but the shirts aren't the greatest. Apparently their supplier thinks everyone has very short arms. The volunteers were apologetic about this. The expo was actually bigger than I expected for a race this size but the venue was crowded and it was a little confusing on where to find actual check in, not many signs to lead you up to 2nd floor where it was located, but volunteers again were very helpful. Overall I would definitely do this race again.
J. S. from USA (3/30/2011) "If you can't fix it... join it!" (about: 2010) 11-50 previous marathons \| 2 Windermere Marathons COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 2 I ran the first two Windemere Marathons, and yes, each had their share of issues, all detailed here (except the woman who said the course was 2.5 miles short; uh... no... it was .8 miles short). Anyway, I've run over 30 marathons and live in Spokane, so I reached out and joined the board. I can say that the issues have been heard loud and clear. This is a low-key, fun marathon with an AWESOME medal and shirt. Flat and fast... give it a chance. You won't regret it.
M. W. from Santa Monica, CA (11/14/2010) "GOOD but with potential to be GREAT" (about: 2010) 11-50 previous marathons COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 Overall, this was a terrific event. The only problems were that they: 1) failed to properly calculate the finish line (that's right - THE FINISH LINE!); and 2) failed to calculate our time when a train crossed the marathon path forcing runners to stop for several minutes. Regarding the finish line: no one mentioned anything about it being "off" until AFTER we crossed the finish line. So, when we passed under the finish banner, we were told by the race organizer to turn around and keep running (back another 2.5 miles). If you've run one, you know how disappointing and frustrating it is not to be finished when you race to get to the FINISH LINE. What made this HUGE MISTAKE so much worse was that instead of telling us to do 1.25 miles and turn around so we could finish with the banner, the medals and the crowd down the finish chute, they sent us out 2.5 miles to some guy standing near a tree with a clipboard. We didn't even know if this guy was related to the race or not, but it appeared other runners were talking to him. He took our bib numbers and then said, "You're done." After this, we had to walk back to the official "finish" to get the medals and water and food. REALLY?? Problem 2: the train. So, it really did cut right through the course. And, we had to stop. I was on one side of the train and my husband on another. Ugh. I didn't even mind the train, truth told. But, please remember to calculate our time accordingly. Having said that, I recommend this marathon. I enjoyed it very much overall. If they can figure out how to measure 26.2 miles, wow - good times. Great shirts.
R. C. from Tennessee (6/3/2010) "Great race, with one flaw" (about: 2010) 11-50 previous marathons \| 1 Windermere Marathon COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 I've run 12 marathons prior to this race. The water, HEED and gel stops were well placed and stocked, even for middle- and late-pack racers. I cannot give enough credit to the volunteers and organizers for the support on the course. As with all races that I've run, the race had great and not-so-great moments. There are MANY beautiful parts of the course. There were a couple of turns that could have been better marked, but overall, the course was great. The flaw: the course was short. There's been much bashing of the course. As a casual runner, this was not a problem for me. The organizers have gone to great lengths to appeal to Boston for the BQ runners with success. Not all organizers would do this. Kudos to the organizers for the effort. If running again in WA, I'll be back to this race. Maybe next time, the weather will not be so "nice."
G. S. from Houston, TX (5/25/2010) "Not quite a marathon, plus a train!" (about: 2010) 4-5 previous marathons \| 1 Windermere Marathon COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 2 As already detailed, major problems included: 1. Late start 2. All mile markers were wrong and the finish was short of 26.2 (quite a sin, especially for those who didn't have GPS) 3. A train crossed course about 3:20 after start. I was first to get to the train and waited for about 5 minutes as more and more people piled up. They did have someone there writing down the numbers of those delayed, but I don't know how they will differentiate the varying times each runner was delayed for. As of 10 days post-race, the promised time adjustments have not been posted, so I still don't know my time. 4. Sunny and relentlessly hot, with very little shade On the plus side: 1. Few runners, so no crowding on the course 2. Sufficient, well-manned water stations; HEED was a tasty electrolyte drink 3. Pretty scenery for much of race 4. Flat course Overall, I'd say that the organizers fail Marathon 101 for having a course of the wrong length, and I would be cautious about committing your training to this race.
K. B. from Spokane (5/23/2010) "Course was great. Race was late. People are good." (about: 2010) 1 previous marathon \| 1 Windermere Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 5 Here we go. My first marathon. Mostly flat. Rolling hills. Aid stations every 2 miles or so, many offering gel. The course is fine. Organization: Lacking. Late start. Screw up on mileage. A few spots to get lost if your not careful. Finish line isn't the finish line? Oh yeah, I have to sign up for another marathon to actually run 26.2. Tough way to train.
P. M. from AUSTIN TX (5/20/2010) "Not a Marathon" (about: 2010) 50+ previous marathons \| 1 Windermere Marathon COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 1 Some of the highlights of this NOT marathon were: 1- 25.4 miles of paved trails ran by the Spokane River; views were just beautiful and I could actually look up and enjoy without worrying about tripping like most trail runs. 2- Aid stations were just about right, not considering the sport drink, HEED, which doesn't do much for me. 3- The entire race felt downhill, other than a few small uphills. 4- Post-race food was great: chicken kabobs - as much as you can eat. There were of course a few hiccups as far as race organization. 1- Race started 12 minutes late trying to line up with the half marathon, which had nothing to do with marathon they started at half point, They could have easily started this race at 6:00 a.m. instead of 7:00, since we had bright light by 5:00 a.m.; this would have prevented people from being out there in heat! 3- Of course, last but most important: The race was cut short by .8 miles by the biker who was supposed to lead the elites! I realized this as soon as I saw mile marker 3 in less than 20 minutes! They had a biker at mile 25 telling people that if they want a Boston qualifier time, they need to turn around at the finish and run another .8 mile to the Red Lion Hotel for the 26.2 distance. Of course, I did, but more than 300 people didn't! This kind of puzzled me; why would you attempt to run a marathon and stop one mile before the finish? This was my 176th marathon and the only one where the finish line wasn't at the finish! I finished in just under 4 hours, BQed and placed first in my age group.
Jack Brooks from St Albans, England (5/20/2010) "Hopeless" (about: 2010) 50+ previous marathons \| 1 Windermere Marathon COURSE: 2 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 1 If I run a race that is advertised as a marathon, I expect to run a measured distance. After the lead cyclist took everybody the wrong way early on there was a half-hearted attempt to let some runners make up the distance at the end. I was asked if I wanted to run a Boston qualifier. I didn't, but I did want to know where I needed to turn around so that I could run the full marathon distance rather than having to stand at the finish line for nearly 3 minutes asking the question. I traveled from the UK for this race. I wish I hadn't.

More Comments: [ < 1 2 3 4 > ]

Become an Advertiser

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor

Become an Advertiser

© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC

Privacy Policy Refund Policy Terms of Use