May 11, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Vancouver International Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Vancouver International Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.1 
Organization 3.6 
Spectators 3.9
Number of comments: 227 [displaying comments 181 to 191]
|
M. M. from Vancouver, BC
(5/8/2003)
 "Not scenic...are you crazy?" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 3 The Vancouver marathon is the most beautiful, scenic race I have done. I have run Victoria several times, which is considered to be one of the most scenic, but I thought Vancouver far outdid it. This is my home town and the first time I have done the race. It is a very challenging course, but the best race I have run at marathon distance. I loved it...but it definitely isn't flat for all of you that read the brochure! | |
|
P. H. from Los Angeles
(5/8/2003)
 "Just do it !" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 3 A challenging but rewarding marathon. Don't expect a PR here but the city (stay around for a few days) and course make it worth it. Prepare for all types of weather (particularly bad!!). Organization was superb, drinks every two miles is plenty in the weather. Volunteers were excellent, thanks. | |
|
J. W. from Eugene, OR
(5/8/2003)
"A swell Marathon in a great city" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 4 This marathon through one of North America's finest cities is a must for those who are truly into balancing running with travel (and not hung up on having to run a PR on some flat and easy course). Vancouver is a physically beautiful and ethnically diverse city that is a treat to visit, and the marathon itself ain't half bad either. From looking at posts from previous years, it seems that this marathon has improved it's water distribution, as this year I found the water stops to be way more than adequately placed and staffed (aside from a bit of a long gap at one point during the first half). One unfortunate point, however, is that the marathon may be tweaking the course next year to make it flatter and faster by eliminating some of the bridge crossings as well as the climb up to Prospect Point in Stanley Park. In my opinion this would be too bad, as we need more marathons to maintain geographic integrity and not sell out to the mass appeal of a PR via a flat course. A marathon in Vancouver without bridge crossings or the outer loop through Stanley Park (including the climb) just wouldn't seem right... | |
|
Angela Anderson from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
(5/6/2003)
 "Do Not Miss This Marathon!!!!" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 The 2003 VIM was my first marathon, and in spite of the rain, I loved every minute of it. I think the fact that it was hilly made it even more satisfying to finish and all that much easier to be proud of my accomplishment. The Saturday morning bus tour was a huge help, but be warned, the tour was 2.5 hours, not the 40 minutes I was told. The race itself took place on a beautiful course (how could it not be in this amazing city?) and I felt that the water/aid stations were abundant. Runners were also given orange slices, Vector bars, and sponges, as well as water and Gatorade. The third time crossing the bridge isn't easy, but with enough hill training, it shouldn't pose too much of a problem for anyone. (We Edmontonians have more than enough opportunities for quality hill training.) My only complaint is that there were completely inadequate bathroom facilities prior to the start of the race. It's a scary feeling to be in a bathroom lineup for half an hour and not be sure if you'll catch the beginning of the race. Otherwise, it was so much fun to run, and I haven't stopped smiling since! I can't wait to do it again, and I hope they DON'T flatten the course for next year! | |
|
D. B. from Vancouver
(5/6/2003)
"Parking ticket on street" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 5 I have parked on the street for years and never received a meter ticket until this year. You can't put enough money in the meter at 6:00 and secondly most of us are long gone before there is any type of traffic downtown. Why wouldn't the city look at the benefits of promoting an event like this downtown before any othere activity is under way and not ticket at 9:23 of the morning. This a great convention for the city! | |
|
Elfi Ortenburger from Oak Park ( Los Angeles Area ) California
(5/6/2003)
"Loved it !!" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 It was wet and cold, yet I loved every minute of the race. The course was interesting and challenging and I can't imagine a better way of touring the fabulous city of Vancouver. A couple of more waterstop in the first few miles would have been nice, but other than that, everything was GREAT !! | |
|
Traveled from Minnesota for this race from St. Paul, MN
(5/6/2003)
"Fun, scenic course with a few well placed hills" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 3 Ran the half marathon. A PR for me despite the light rain and gently rolling hills. Hill training would be good prep for this race, as it will provide you with the confidence to manage anything on the course. Volunteers toughed it out in the rain and were fun and in good spirits. Water and Gatorade stops were well placed and apparently improved from years past. Temp at 48F was perfect. Spectators were less than expected (probably due to the rain). Vancouver is a cool city and the Canadians are really nice people, eh. All in all, well organized, mostly scenic route to keep your mind off of things if you want. Stanley Park is a beautiful part of the race, despite the hill (don't look up). Fast finish the last two miles (helps make up time lost to the hills!). Race is rumored to be changed next year to flatten things out a bit. I would recommend this race to anyone. | |
|
A. L. from Seattle, WA
(5/6/2003)
"It's a must" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This was my first marathon, and you can count on me coming back every year. | |
|
Paul de B from Peachland, BC Canada
(4/22/2003)
"Very good experience" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 4 The weather wasn't great and there were a few organizational glitches, but overall I thought this marathon was a great experience. Aid stations were well placed and volunteers were obviously working hard. At the end they had given away all t-shirts in my size (why bother ordering one if they're just going to give it away?) but to be fair they did mail me one in my size a month later, which I appreciated. The course is scenic, with lots to look at and you basically get a running tour of the city. Don't be fooled though - they say it's mostly flat with a few hills, but it's definitely a rolling course with more hills than I had anticipated. Crowd support was good at the start but sparse through most of the rest of the run (this may have been influenced by the weather). Overall, I found the course interesting, the people friendly and helpful, and the atmosphere just right. I would definitely come back in the future. | |
|
A. M. from Vancouver
(4/20/2003)
 "Not a very scenic route" (General Comments)
COURSE: 2 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 2 I have run the Vancouver Marathon 4 times and although the previous route was tough it was very scenic. I think for an International Marathon Vanc. can offer a much more scenec 26.2 miles. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
.gif)
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
