May 18, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Kansas City Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Kansas City Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.2 
Organization 4.1 
Spectators 3.7
Number of comments: 207 [displaying comments 181 to 191]
|
D. N. from Lake Saint Louis, MO 63367
(11/5/2003)
 "Difficult to set a PR on this course" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 Decided to sign up for this one at the last minute to use as a long training run for a marathon in early December. This was definitely a hill-packed marathon. You are either going up or downhill 90% of the time. I had been training on hills so I was able to handle the hills, because the aren't huge hills. My biggest complaint is aid stations - every two mile aid stations were advertised, but near the end where water is needed the most, they were few and far between. Also a volunteer near the end was saying, 'only 10 blocks all down hill'. What was that all about!?!?! That kind of misinformation can break you mentally at the end of a marathon - it is better as a volunteer NOT to comment on the course. I would run this one again! | |
|
M. H. from Kansas City
(11/4/2003)
 "Brutal course with nice volunteers and spectators" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 This course should be rated as difficult due to the excessive amount of hills. I feel there is more interesting parts of K.C. that the route could include without so many hills. Organizers should consider moving this race up a month due to the bad weather year after year. Volunteers and spectators were very friendly. I didn't expect too many spectators due to the lack of advertising this marathon gets. No one knows about it, unless you're a runner. | |
|
Running KC from Kansas City, MO
(11/4/2003)
 "What a hard course!!!" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 2 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 1 I ran the 5K portion of the race in 2002 and thought that was challenging. This year I ran the 1/2 marathon and now I question if I will do this race again. It is good for experienced runners that want a challenge, but for beginners (like me), this course is difficult. KC offers beautiful neighborhoods and scenery and this course does not show the best of KC. There is limited sponsorship, therefore, there is pretty much nothing at the end. This year we had to take the elevator up in the hotel to even collect our goodies. Organizers needed to consider thousands of sweaty runners cramming into the elevators was not going to be pleasant (for the runners or guests in the hotel). This was not a well publicized race so there was not much crowd support. Though, those that did brave the chilly weather were full of spirit. The only way I will do this race again is if I decide to see if I can beat my time from this year. Otherwise, it is not a very fun race. | |
|
a. k. from leawood, kansas
(11/2/2003)
"Not for a first-timer, but great" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 2 Good challenging course. It was hilly throughout including the uphill most of the last mile. There were several down-and-back portions of the course. Most won't find this appealing - the upside is you experience camaraderie with fellow runners. Being a local, I expected the unpredictable weather and cool temps. I also figured on few spectators but the ones who would be there would be upbeat and friendly. | |
|
Warren Johnson from Wisconsin
(11/2/2003)
"I PR'd and it was cool, but otherwise ..." (about: 2003)
COURSE: 2 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 1 This was my roughly 10th different marathon - here are my expectations: 1. Scenic course showing off the locale. 2. Pre-race expo. 3. Some spectators. Here's what I saw in KC: 1. We drove some beautiful parkways in KC - we didn't run them. Since the course was very hilly, I don't think it would be any less hilly to get to anywhere in KC. 2. No expo. 3. Barely anyone on the course, even with about 1,500 participants in the marathon, 1/2 marathon, and 5K. Afterwards, the 3 people in our group stayed overnight and talked to many locals. No one knew about the marathon. Here's why we chose KC: 1. Saturday marathon (can stretch out a day before hitting the road). 2. Could drive to it. 3. Happens in late fall. 4. Certified course. | |
|
K. V. from Kansas City
(11/2/2003)
 "Just a plain race, nothing interesting about it" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 2 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 3 The course is hilly, which, even though it's hard, that's fine. Worse though, is the dullness and plain ugliness of the course. There are so many beautiful areas of Kansas City, I find it hard to believe this is the route chosen. The finish line is practically an alley, many areas of the course are places I wouldn't feel safe driving through any other time and there aren't many good spectator opportunities. The pre- and post-race activities were non-existent. I've run in first-year, small races with better food and drinks afterward. I had to ask three people where the post-race activities were (the 28th floor?) and after getting there, there were a few apples, green bananas, some juice and coffee. And this wasn't at the tail-end of the day either. I don't know what the later marathoners found when they got there. I hope that the organizers can tweak the route - keep the hills, at least they're a defining feature. But certainly there are some more pleasant places to show visitors here for a race. | |
|
M. B. from Dubuque, IA
(11/2/2003)
 "Brutal course and I finished with a PR" (about: 2003)
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 1 There is no reason that KC can't host a major marathon! The organizers need to decide that the marathon is the jewel and the 5k and 1/2 are merely add ons. Course: The course is brutal and organizers should market it as a difficult marathon. There are a lot of hills and very few flat portions of the course. I can't recall running for more than a mile where it is flat. The hills are not all that difficult, but they are constant. Things were great for me until mile 24. I maintained an even pace until the last 2.2 miles - much uphill. I ran the last 2.2 in 25 minutes because of the difficulty of the course. I set a PR by 12 minutes and finished 3 minutes off my ultimate goal, but I finished a very challenging race. Organization: The marathon felt like a 1/2 marathon with a marathon distance tacked on to it. There was only one aid station that was not on the marathon route. The out-and-back portions of the marathon were lonely. And, at mile 22, someone started letting cars and trucks on the route (I was at a 10-minute pace). Kudos to all of the volunteers at all of the streets that did their job and blocked traffic, you were great and your encouragement was appreciated! The website should have a map with mile markers and an elevation map. Market this thing as it is, a difficult marathon where pacing is the key because the hills will break you. The website also needs to be updated. (On the Thursday before, it still had messages that said start training now and more events are planned - come on.) Local newspaper coverage was not good - if Jason Whitlock (KC Star Columnist) wasn't covering it and participating in it, it may have been non-existent. Thank you Jason! Spectators: If it hadn't been for my family who cheered me on at mile 4, 8, 11, 13, 21 and the finish, there wouldn't have been too many. Overall: I feel a great sense of accomplishment for finishing this marathon. It could be so much better and, as someone who grew up in KC, I hope the directors continue to make improvements. | |
|
T. S. from Prairie Village, Kansas
(10/27/2003)
"K.C. could do better" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 2 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 I have run the Kansas City Marathon three times on three different courses and this one was the worst. This town has so much to be proud of, but the race showed little of it. The medical staff that helped me after the race was first-rate, however. | |
|
L. R. from Kansas City, USA
(9/22/2003)
"Not bad for a new marathon, but needs work" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 2 Being from Kansas City I obviously have a different view than some out of towners. Unfortunately, I think several things could have been done better. The last third of the course is totally depressing. Especially on a cold rainy winter day. Who wants to run through a warehouse district with little chance of fan support or scenic vistas. Kansas City prides itself on miles and miles of beautiful parkways and boulevards that would make a wonderful course, but we never saw them. The miles of downhills aren't very joint friendly either. My last complaint deals with the finishers medal. Although the sponsor made sure their name is prominently displayed, nowhere on the medal does it say Kansas City. It looked like the name of the city was Humana. I don't mean it to sound all negative. I just feel it could have been so much better. Hopefully it will improve each year. A different course would be a huge help. | |
|
M. M. from Colorado
(5/5/2003)
 "I liked it better than the Pig or Twin Cities" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 4 I really liked the course layout. Sure it was hilly, but you were able to cruise along the cliffs during the hardest part of a marathon (12-18 miles) and several out and back portions of the course allowed you to see and interact with the other runners. Beware! The last .2 mi is the most HELLACIOUS you will encounter on any course. I really liked the crowd support as well. Organization could have been a bit better. (Missed turn right before 10 mile mark.) Some confusion over awards - (Received award for wrong age group) - but nothing major, especially for a first year marathon. Unusually chilly for KC in November from what I understand, but pretty darn good for running a marathon with a long sleeve coolmax shirt and tights. PR by 24 minutes! |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
