By: Jeff M.
Posted: October 28, 2013
Nice race
Very fast course. I could easily see going for a PR on this course. Very accurate distance and very flat. I was by myself the entire race and I found the course pretty easy to follow. The roads and intersections were handled very well for a race this size. Plenty of water stops and volunteers. Some spectators along the way, but not many. On the negative side, the parking at the start was kind of far away for a race this size, but for a city race, it wasn't that bad. The medals were small, but unique and there were a lot of awards going 3 deep in 5 year age groups. The awards were great. Trophies for the overall and masters and glasses for the age groups. The volunteers were extremely friendly and nice. There was free live music and Barbecue hamburgers and hot dogs after the race, free messages.
As far as traveling, we were able to stay 10 min away on the other side on the bridge at a reasonable rate and had a big plate of Spaghetti and meat balls for $11 at a place called Rocky's that was right on the river.
Also, the shirt was excellent. One of my favorites.
Overall I liked this race and would do it again and would recommend it for a BQ or PR.
By: Thomas H.
Posted: October 25, 2013
Disappointing!
This event is an OK local training run, but a poor travel 'marathon experience'. Limited website; high cost; no pre-race comm.s; disorganized bib pickup; wet grass parking area; boring, tough- to-follow course (saw 2 other runners in the last 7 miles); zero spectators; 'medal' was a cheap, small piece of tin necklace...thought they were joking. Positives were: friendly volunteers; occasional small bottles of water; blocked intersections; mostly decent mile markers; couple of blocks of downtown views; cool weather. Other Kentucky options are likely more rewarding for '50 Staters'.
By: Eric W.
Posted: October 21, 2013
This is a low-stress, beautiful run.
I would strongly recommend this race for experienced runners. It's small, so you may be alone at times, but it is very well run.
Good: well marked course, nice views of the river, pretty flat, nice/consistent aid stations, nice necklace in lieu of medal
Bad: walking across a cold/dewy field to get to the start, volunteers seemed uninformed (according to my spectators)
By: Terry m.
Posted: October 21, 2013
Poorly marked course
The course itself was good especially running in the woods. However, running from 20 miles on you cannot see anyone in front of you and no one behind you. The course is poorly marked. No one to direct runners and a just few infrequent blue arrows directing the course. You cannot be sure you are on the course. I ran off the course towards the police but was told the marathon course was back in the other direction. I paid for the marathon but they did not show me as registered. Thank goodness I brought a receipt. Not enough fluids for the course. The aid station volunteers were great and very pleasant. Run a different marathon in Kentucky. The race appears to have catered to the half-marathoners. I am not very interested in medals but they give you a 'necklace' which is some generic medal that is cheap as it comes. Just don't give a medal.
By: Tommie K.
Posted: July 31, 2013
Training for the Oct. 20 race!
I started training for the marathon this week, 12 weeks out. Should be a good one! I've run this race a few times and it was the first course I broke 3 hours on. It is a flat course, and hopefully there will be a few more runners out this year. I want to see some of these smaller Kentucky marathons really grow. I think it's a great one for the locals and for travelers, and for more experienced runners and for first timers. I'll be shooting for the 2:50s this year. Can't wait!
By: Nick Karem
Posted: October 20, 2011
My finish time was 6:08:19
My actual finish time was an hour more than the posted time, have reported this to the RD.
Nick Karem (M68) 5:08:19 91 59 / 1 M65-69 5:08:19 Louisville, KY, USA 3:51:40
By: Jeff C.
Posted: November 19, 2010
Great small race to qualify for Boston
Great race. Only one small problem. I didn't know where to go around 20 to 21. I started yelling and finally someone told me. But I did love the course.
By: Kevin Felton
Posted: October 18, 2010
Flat, scenic, marathon: great Boston qualifier
This marathon is a gem of a race. It is flat and fast but has enough gently rolling hills so it doesn't get boring. Much of the race is along a shaded path along the Ohio River - pretty cool! The weather was also great although a bit warm at the end. Great Boston qualifier. I will be back next year.
By: Jeremy B.
Posted: October 18, 2010
Flat, fast course on the scenic Ohio River
I had a great time at this raceThere were plenty of aid stations and the volunteers were good. Parts of the route wind through local parts, which are really pretty this time of year. It's a good race for a PR.
By: rhonda c.
Posted: October 18, 2010
Great race for those who run for RUNNING
The course was relatively flat and nice. There was a nice view running along the OH River. Very safe with police and lots of volunteers. There were about 1000 people in the half and full marathon combined. Not a lot of "hoopla." This race is for people who run because they like to run, and not for those who want tons of cheering people, loud music, etc. What do I think? JUST RUN! I will do this race again. And I do recommend it to beginners and seasoned runners alike.
By: Monkey Trent
Posted: July 20, 2010
Flat, fast, scenic, cool - great race!
It is a scenic, flat and fast marathon that is more than adequately supported and which typically has good weather. What else do you need? Shirts are fine, medals are small and there are not many crowds, but what does any of that matter? Come on, people.
By: Stephanie A.
Posted: November 05, 2009
Plastic tiny medals, NO support, boring course
At one point I passed friends of mine and actually said, "I'm so bored!" That has NEVER happened.
The medals were tiny, there was a flaky staff of volunteers (who didn't know anything about the course, gel or water - and half of them THOUGHT there was a bag check but weren't sure).
The course is just plain boring!!!! And it was run on ALL cement... holy OUCH!
By: Paul B.
Posted: November 02, 2009
Lousy website; flat course
The race website was terrible. Three weeks after the 2009 race, the website still has information for the 2008 race listed. The site was never updated! The race price was even increased without notice. Emails were never returned. No photographer for the race and the results were never posted on the website.
The course itself is pretty nice. Very flat but disappointing that more of it didn't go through the city. The trail through the woods is very nice. The volunteers were great! Bottled waters were handed out, as was HEED sports drink. The spectators were few and far between - not good if you like that sort of thing. Nice tech shirts. Medals were tiny - about the size of a silver dollar. Same medals for both the half and full marathons. After-race food was very limited.
I wouldn't suggest this race for a first-timer, as you might be very disappointed on what the whole marathon "event" is all about. However, if you want a flat, fast course, this is a good race to run.
By: Craig L.
Posted: October 29, 2009
Poor website, poor organization - poor runners!
I should have known what to expect when I reviewed the race website: old photos, old results, dead links, and a very poor course map. The course was a nice, fairly flat out-and-back, and the volunteers were great. Organization was poor. The marathon course measured 26.34 by my Garmin (not even close). They never posted results on-site or online after the race. No certificates, small medals and one table of food after. I would not suggest this one to anyone - if they even have it again!
By: Joe W.
Posted: October 27, 2009
Small race with great volunteers.
This is definitely a no-frills race. The course is not bad; it's relatively flat. But you do not see a ton of Louisville on the course - mostly the riverfront. Very few spectators on the course. The few that were there were very nice. The volunteers were great. The website for the race is not good. The race shirt is very nice, but the medal is small and the marathoners and the half marathoners received the same medal. There are also no clocks throughout the course. The race director is very nice. It is not a bad race, but I do not recommend this for a first marathon. I think with some changes this could be a great race.
The HEED drink needs to go. Bad taste.
By: Jill M.
Posted: October 26, 2009
Nice, flat course but lack of organization
I ran this race as a "tune up" for a Boston qualifier in December 2009. The race is flat and fast except for a couple little inclines. Overall a good course and lovely volunteers.
The race director could certainly use some skill adjustments in communication, as I've emailed this person twice since returning from the race and will probably never hear from him/her. I find that completely insane. Anyway, there is a lack of timing mats - except at the start and finish - which leaves you to wonder how many folks might take a little break out in the woods and then take a turn back to the finish for a BQ time. Something the race director should think about. Not even a 10K or half-marathon mat or halfway mat. That seems rather odd to me.
Overall, I would not run this race again as I like organization and I did pay a hefty price for what little I got. I must also agree with others about the HEED on the course. Why?? There are much better, affordable sports drinks out there. Blehck.
By: Kelly J.
Posted: October 22, 2009
Decent race but needs better organization
I ran this race to check KY off the list. It was advertised as flat, and while it was mostly flat, the course had more hills than anticipated and described throughout the course.
Pros: Small race and relatively flat course; volunteers were nice at the race.
Cons: The race website was awful, the course map was not updated and still read "2006," so it was hard to know what you were actually running; FAQs say that the race starts/ends downtown by the Louisville Slugger Bat Museum, but that is incorrect and should be updated (hard for out-of-town runners to choose a hotel). Heed sports drink is not tolerated by many runners - better to stick to Gatorade or PowerAde.
By: Steve O.
Posted: October 22, 2009
Nice course, well organized race, perfect weather.
Very pleasant, small marathon. Flat course with nice view of the Ohio River. Easy access to the hotel, and the race finish line was a lot of fun. A great, small marathon. I will do this one again.
By: Ken R.
Posted: October 22, 2009
Flat and fast course
Great little marathon. Course is flat and run near sea-level. I've run six marathons and this was by far the fastest course I've run. The only hills consisted of little, 50-yard hills running up and down from levies a few times. Bottled water was given at aid stations, which made for easy drinking. Towards the end, I would have liked to have seen more energy drinks. Volunteers were great at the stations, passing out oranges and bananas. The race was a bit cold at first, so wear gloves and a hat. However, by mile three, I shed both my gloves and hat.
While the medal is very small (about the size of a half-dollar), the shirt is nice AND they even let me try on the shirt at the pick-up to make sure the size worked.
By: Jon M.
Posted: October 21, 2009
Just another long run
This is a race that's hard to get excited about. The course is pretty and flat but also monotonous and desolate. Other than the wonderful volunteers at the water stops there is no organization to speak of. The website was basically abandoned three days after the race; the times and photos haven't been posted. (I suspect they never will be.) No clocks or timing pads along the way. No differentiation between marathoners and half-marathoners - same color numbers, same shirts, same medals. This is a fine race if you've run many others. But if you're looking to run the first (and perhaps only) marathon of your life, you'll want to choose something more memorable.
By: Drew S.
Posted: October 21, 2009
Good if you like a small marathon.
If you like the large marathon/large expo experience, then this is NOT for you. However, if you don't mind a smaller race with no expo (one local vendor with nutrition bars/gels), this is a very good race.
The course is mainly an out-and-back along the Ohio River and by Slugger Field and the waterfront. There are a couple of small loops around three different parks. It is relatively flat. The biggest hill was just after mile 19, but it was not a killer by any means.
Race time temp was 35 degrees, so I started heavily clothed with gloves and hat - the whole deal. It is very nice that the course passes the start line around Mile 3, and I threw a lot of the warmer stuff off then.
If you want to do a marathon in Louisville for the size, do the Derby Festival in April. If you want an easier course and don't mind it being a little smaller, do this one.
By: kev f.
Posted: October 20, 2009
Great First Marathon
This was my first marathon and I loved it. The course seemed a little narrow in places through the park and a few more hills than I expected, but it was good for me. I was able to finish my first one and hope to do it again next year.
By: Cliff J.
Posted: October 19, 2009
well organized, pretty course
This was my first marathon. It was well executed, with water, sports drinks and gels about every two miles. It was missing a decent map of the course, and the trail was sometimes narrow for an out-and-back.
By: jason l.
Posted: October 19, 2009
no-frills marathon
I chose to run this race as it has a high percentage of Boston qualifiers. The course is indeed flat, but very boring. I typically run even splits, but had huge swings in this race, which leads me to question the mile markers. I felt that the race organization was good, and did like the fact that the start was easily accessible. The race director was very personable. The water bottles were great along the way, but I can't understand why they would choose to serve HEED along the course... have they not read last year's comments? It tastes exactly like baby aspirin. could have used aid stations closer the last 5-6 miles. The t-shirt graphics are obviously low-budget, and the medals are laughable (they're no bigger than the face of my watch... no joke). Had I not qualified for Boston, I probably would not recommend it, but all in all, it's a decent race. It should cost more like $50.
By: Jim S.
Posted: April 09, 2009
Great race to start out!!
I ran this race a couple years ago and I really enjoyed myself. I will be returning this year. Great job on the organization. The fans are not as plentiful when compared to the larger marathons, but they do well for the number of them. See you there!!
By: Mike W.
Posted: December 03, 2008
Becoming a favorite of mine
I don't know why they were going to change the course. This is my second time at this race and I love the course. The start area is very convenient and I love the stretch along the river and through the parks. Yes, River Road is a bit boring and industrial, but it's only about 5 miles. This time, knowing the course and getting perfect weather, I qualified for Boston, so I would recommend it as a good qualifier. But, if you want big crowds, then this may not be your race.
By: Laura C.
Posted: November 05, 2008
Great for first-timers!
This was my first marathon. Overall it was a great experience for me. Packet pickup the day before was a breeze and I got to try on my jacket to make sure it fit before I left (as opposed to just being handed a size and having to move on).
The weather was a little cold (30's) and my feet were numb by the time the race started. I did not like starting the race and then going straight into Cox Park on a narrow trail. I was forced off the asphalt trail and into the grass at times and could not pass people. Lost some time in the parks for about a mile or so. Also, be prepared for a little COLD wind off the river. The trail winds down into Shawnee Park and the scenery... what scenery? It's a trail through a wooded park. I was expecting a flat run and this had a few hills, especially on the run back. The long, long hill up to the flood wall before mile 21 almost did me in. Be prepared, there are switchbacks and a few steep hills along this course, but for the most part it is flat.
The water stations and volunteers were great! They had multiple things ready for you to choose from. I did carry my own gels, though. The volunteers deserve a huge thank you because I saw more than a few get slung with water, Heed, banana peels and who knows what else. There weren't many spectators on the marathon course and the volunteers clapped and yelled encouraging words.
The porta-pots really thinned out on the course after the half marathoners turned around. There were either lines or none around, so I had to go way off the trail for relief.
My biggest complaint was that coming out of the last loop in Shawnee Park, the trail split. There were no volunteers at the split and if there was a marker, it was gone or had fallen. Several of us went the wrong way and had to turn around. Lost time there!! (This was a small marathon, so at times I was running by myself - i.e., there was no one to follow).
There are no clocks except at the start, finish, and halfway point. It didn't bother me because I was running to finish, not for a time. The mile markers were big, bright and visible though so that helped.
iPods are allowed.
I had a slow marathon time, and when I finished there was still ample food and drink. Someone took off my chip, so I didn't have to hassle with that. A volunteer even put peanut butter on a bagel for me!
Great first marathon experience and I would run this again. There was a last-minute course change for 2008 (back to the old course???), so it may have a new course for 2009.
By: Matt J.
Posted: November 05, 2008
I Love this Marathon!
I absolutely love the Louisville Marathon, and I was thrilled to find out they had not changed the course. The course is very flat, and there are several areas where you can run on dirt/grass instead of concrete and pavement.
The pullovers and medals were awesome this year. Some of the best stuff I've gotten from a marathon this year.
I would run this marathon every year if I lived closer to Louisville.
By: Bridget S.
Posted: November 01, 2008
A disappointing race
The biggest disappointment was the last-minute course change that I didn't know anything about until the day of the expo. As an out-of-towner, I always try to book my hotel near the start/finish areas for ease in arriving and exiting the race. That would have been the case if the course had remained where it was said to be, and I find it hard that the details with the city had not been worked out long before the week of the race. Thus, for those of us who had long since booked our lodging for the downtown area, we had to catch a shuttle bus and stand out in the cold for nearly an hour prior to the start of the race, which was several minutes late beginning.
As for the course, that was another disappointment. The out-and-back creates too many runners on the same course going in opposite directions and the path was way too narrow for this. You practically had to run single-file, which severely cripples your time.
Once at the finish, it took way too long to hold the awards ceremony, especially since most of the early runners had long since crossed the finish line. They could have handed out the awards 45 minutes sooner than they did (for the half marathoners). And to top it all off, the return shuttles must have been invisible because I waited for nearly 45 minutes and one never showed up. Finally, I flagged down a car leaving the parking lot and asked if he was heading downtown and he graciously agreed to drop me off, even though it was out of his way. (Otha - if you see this, THANK YOU again!)
Overall, this race was a disappointment and I cannot recommend it to anyone. Obviously, some liked it better than others, but if you are a 50-stater like myself, I recommend waiting for the Derby race in late April. While it is much larger than this one, I think the organization is much better and the medal is as well (this medal is plain and could use some color). With all that said, the organizers are nice and I'm sure tried their best, but it was an overall disappointment to me.
By: Gunnar Bruun
Posted: October 30, 2008
PR course, well put together.
My first time running this race was a pleasant one. Course was flat, and even though I am not a fan of out and back courses it was rather nice. Organization was good, spectators non-existent and weather perfect.
Agree with one of the other runners posting here: what was up with that horrible sports drink. Heed, was it? That stuff was nasty, and I will never touch it again.
I stayed at Ramada Inn, right next to the start/finish, but sadly can't recommend it to anyone. Horrible, is all I can say. Find another hotel.
By: Heather P.
Posted: October 28, 2008
Very disorganized with very few spectators!
Yes, the course is very flat and scenic if you want to see the river and nice parks. You won't see much of the city though. Being from out of town, this was somewhat of a letdown.
At the packet pick-up, I was told (by the race director himself) that there would be tent for a bag drop area at the start/finish. However, when we arrived by shuttle the morning of the race (since the course was changed at the last minute), I was then told by the race director that there was no bag drop. He said I could leave my bag by the table of food (that was the meager post-race party), and hopefully it would be there when I returned. Apparently I wasn't the only one fed this falsehood, since there were four other people standing there looking for this bag-drop tent.
I am all for smaller, home-grown races, but there has to be some level of organization that is met. I will not be traveling to this race ever again.
By: Tiffany F.
Posted: October 26, 2008
Great flat course
This was my first time running this, and it was really great. Very flat and fast. Good for beginners. I look forward to it next year.
By: Byron Doty
Posted: October 25, 2008
Great, small marathon
This was my first Louisville Marathon and I loved it. The course was great, even though it was an out-and-back. The volunteers were great and the little bottles of water are perfect for having aid stations two miles apart. The weather couldn't have been any better. I don't know what the so-called new course is supposed to be like, but it must be something to be better than this. I would definitely recommend this one to friends. By the way, we stayed at the Galt House, which is right by the 6.5- and 22-mile mark, and only 4 miles from the finish. It's great for family viewing.
By: Cheryl M.
Posted: October 20, 2008
GREAT Run - Do It!
After reading last year's comments (and a last-minute course change this year), I was hesitant to run this marathon. I ran the Derby Marathon a number of years ago... which was OK.
This race just goes to prove that you CANNOT believe everything you hear or read. Maybe some runners expect too much... like spectators... but who needs 'em? (Go run a few trail events.) I, for one, thoroughly enjoyed the course and all of the volunteers were attentive and cheerful. As a slower runner, often when I come by, the volunteers are just wanting to go home. Not the case here. Lots of smiles all around. The only thing mentioned I can agree on, is the Heed... but if it is donated who can knock it. Would be great to have some gels, but there is no crime in bringing your own. I have completed over 150 marathons (10 this year plus 5 ultras - ran this one with a friend who ran the FULL marathon in Indianapolis and FULL in Louisville, by the way). So feel I have a "few" events for comparison.
Great job, Louisville! Keep the same course! The Ramada Inn staff was also wonderful.
By: Julie M.
Posted: October 20, 2008
Great course for my first Lou 1/2 Marathon!
I'm glad it was changed back to the old route at the last minute. This was my first Louisville Half and I had been told how nice it was. And it was! If you want to change it to the new route next, that would be ok now.
By: Nancy P.
Posted: October 20, 2008
Well organized race, flat course
This is my first run in Louisville, as I am working on my 50 states, so the director's last-minute change to the old course did not bother me one way or the other. I thought the course was great, with a variety of in-town running, and a paved trailed run along the river and through woods. The weather was absolutely perfect and that made my experience even better. The aid stations were well manned and everyone involved with the race was very friendly and helpful. I personally like smaller races over the huge ones, so I would definitely recommend this one to any first-timer looking for a flat course (as long as they do not need a lot of fan or other runner support) or any experienced runner.
By: Jeff D.
Posted: October 20, 2008
Smaller Race
The course was given 4 stars. That is a stretch because it started out with what I thought may be too many sharp hairpin turns, but it regained itself and ended up being more of an out-and-back course. In addition, I chose to stay at the hotel that was closet to the start and finish, But they changed the start and finish and I still had to take a shuttle to the start and finish.
The organization was good by the organizer, Jim Ball, and his crew, but the course was changed by a conflict with what I believe was the City of Louisville (city governments - yeah, enough said). The spectators were small in number, but what do you expect you are in the south running a smaller race on a Sunday,
Overall I would recommend this race to the person who likes a medium-sized race without the large hustle and bustle of Chicago, Detroit, or Nashville Country Music Marathon.
By: Debra H.
Posted: October 19, 2008
Disappointed not using new course
I gave one star for spectators because they were minimal. The volunteers and traffic control at the intersections were 5-star worthy. I did the half after doing the Indy Half at Lawrence on Saturday. Yes, I know very stupid. I was looking forward to a new course because I so dislike the current course. Down the long stretch on River Road, it's so extremely boring and the concrete surface is hard on the legs. It is very walker-friendly. I didn't attend the packet pick-up, so I can`t comment on the organization. I`m sure the logistics of the new course was just impossible to pull off. Kudos, anyway, for even considering it. The weather was just ideal. Food at the end was very basic, but satisfying.
By: Marathon R.
Posted: October 19, 2008
Nice course; poor organization
I'll start with the positive. The course was mostly flat and scenic.
For the negatives: Too few water stops. Heed did not taste good. The race organizers planned a new course for this year; however, due to poor planning, they were unable to obtain support from local government. A notice was placed on the website on 10/13 informing everyone of the change. An email would have been nice. The change moved the start a few miles from the official race hotel. I feel sorry for the out-of-town runners who booked their room in advance. Also, no medical tent at the finish.
This is the first time I have stayed in town for the local marathon. It has potential; however, until they improve the organization, I'll stick with the out-of-town races. Hopefully the organization will improve, as it was nice to stay in town and drive to the start.
By: Radu S.
Posted: December 12, 2007
Very hot for slow runners
This is the scenario that tends to be overlooked: a first-timer, who's a slow runner, has to deal with the race starting at 8 a.m. (ish), leaving only have 2 hours of decent temperature; at noon they're still running, and after mile 18, there is almost no shade, and no breeze (I don't know what others have felt). Heed and stomach refuse to cooperate, leading to dehydration and sickness; you try to switch to all water and risk an imbalance. There's no Gu, and too few water stops (including some that disappeared towards the end). By that time, water is really hot anyway (some ice wouldn't hurt, duh), and spectators are gone by the time you return (at some point you're running into people that have no idea that a marathon is still going on)....
Yes, it happened to me, and I'll stop whining. It might not be as bad as it sounds since I still finished - about 30 minutes slower than what I expected, but I did finish. I am glad I did! :)
Nevertheless, for slow first-timers out there, there are some good organizational things to consider so you avoid the spiral down. Start earlier for lower temperature later in the race, add more water stops with Gu, have cool water and something finishing in "ade" (just say no to Heed - it's awful!).... And more spectators would have helped me avoid some of the mistakes a rookie tends to make.
I would gladly exchange running up some hills with the factors mentioned above. Good luck! No doubt it's all worth it!
By: Mary N.
Posted: November 02, 2007
Lonely Run and Bad Start
Rough start because people were not lined up by time. You shouldn't have to try to get around walkers, especially on such a narrow course. I almost tripped on a baby-jogger - those shouldn't be allowed. Once you get past the half-marathon's turnaround point, it's a very lonely run. The last 6 miles I hardly saw anybody, and volunteers were not great about directing. A couple of times I had to stop and interrupt their conversations to ask which direction to run.
By: Mike Greer
Posted: October 30, 2007
Great marathon for your fall season lineup!
I am originally from Louisville and have heard this is the 'flat and fast one' compared to the Derby Marathon. It was a fantastic experience! I 'skewed up' the scores for the fans, since my brother and his entire family came out to support me and one of my running buddies, 'Coast Guard' Joe, also from Louisville. I agree with others that the water bottles worked out great; the Heed drink was blah (please replace with a citrus flavored sports drink like Gatorade); the technical sweatshirt and the KY state/shoe design medal were both unique; and you don't need to do much more marketing for this one. Although the RD says registrations increased maybe 400 over 2006, I really like the 1,000 to 2,500 size marathons. Large runner fields and mega audiences can zap your energy sometimes. This was my 37th marathon to date (38th was the MCM this past Sunday)...and I will definitely be back for another Louisville marathon! GO ROCKS! (THS 76)
By: Scott S.
Posted: October 26, 2007
Nice Town, Solid Race
It was a good course, very flat, and mostly through parks and on bike paths. Mostly asphalt, with some concrete. It's a quiet marathon; there are very few spectators. The weather was on the warm side for me (coming from CO) but not too humid, not unbearable, not Chicago ;-)
I got to show off my jumping skills at the dock at mile 8. They had these boat tie downs for the Belle of Louisville tourist boat, and I was weaving around them, just for fun. The last one was sort of blocked off by the corner of these concrete steps, so I jumped the lowest step in a completely over-the-top Austin Powers intro way. I'm totally going to run my next marathon in a blue crushed velvet suit, frilly lace cravat, 'male' symbol gold medallion, and Italian leather loafers (Bongiorno, boys!) Well that got the, uh, crowd going...
And look I found a picture of the exact boat tie down!
http://louisville.edu/music/localresources/images/jazz/IASJ%202006/Jam%20Sessions%20for%20Web%20resized/Cruise%20For%20Web/Dock.jpg
That's awesome. None of those people were there at the marathon though.
Just picture A_ jumping over the tie down and step:
http://www.filmposters.it/imgposter/grandi/austinpowers1.jpg
But I digress; of course it's easy to feel good at mile 8. It's not so easy to feel good at mile 19. I got tired, and my 7:50 pace degenerated into an 8:20. I brought 2 gu gels with me, I probably should have brought 4. I figured the race would have gu or something similar at the aid stations, but they only had water and heed sports drink. As others have said, the little water bottles were awesome; you didn't have to slow down to hydrate, and you could dump water over your head if you had extra and were approaching another aid station.
The way the finish is arranged you run up a slight incline and pull a U-turn, and run back down to the actual finish line. So you pass by the finish at about mile marker 26. My PR is 3:30, so I was trying to break that. I heard the announcer call out 3:29 on the other side when I crossed the 26 mile mark, and then I knew I was toast Even in my math-impaired state I knew I couldn't cover 0.2 in one minute and break 3:30. I rounded the corner and thought, well, my PR is actually 3:30-somehting (couldn't remember exactly; 3:30:32 it turns out); I could still hit that! I gave the finish a sprint of some sort ('finish strong', right?), and the clock was pushing 3:31. Not good! The race was chip timed so there would be some bonus from my start delay, but likely not 20 seconds worth (there was about 6 seconds delay as it turns out). In the end I missed a PR by 20 seconds - doh.
I got my medal, got some water, and lay down in the grass. Nice finish area, by the way, very spacious. While lying down I poured a bottle of water on my face, which went right up my nose. Always unpleasant. Then I took off my shoes and socks to admire the blood blister on the front of my big toe. Then I got up and decided that things weren't so bad. I walked back to the Ramada across the street. The Ramada was very convenient to the start/finish; it is extremely nice to be able to walk to the starting line. The hotel was not fancy, nor was it expensive. So you get what you pay for. If amenities are more important than location to you, I would recommend looking for another hotel. They had a swimming pool but it was closed. The free breakfast buffet was ok, nothing special (would like eggs!), and the pre-race dinner was decent but a bit over-priced ($13).
I'd never been to Louisville before, and I was favorably impressed. It is a nice city with some fun things to see and do. We found some great places to eat, including a couple of restaurants that had a lot of vegetarian options. The weather was excellent until the day after the marathon, when a massive rainstorm blanketed the area. Good thing it held off until after the race!
By: can't t.
Posted: October 25, 2007
good work
Thank you everyone for all your support. Louisville is an excellent place to have this marathon. The weather was excellent for the race.
By: Mike W.
Posted: October 24, 2007
Excellent Race
First time running this race and was a little leery given the low frills. But it was a very well organized race on a nice (very little city street running) flat, scenic course. The 8 oz. bottles of water were great. I was worried about support given the size of the race but the volunteers were great. No huge crowds but those that were there were very supportive. And I liked no huge crowds. I get enough of that at other races. It was nice to run a quiet marathon.
By: Shelly N.
Posted: October 23, 2007
Back to the basics..relaxing race
A nice flat course with some shade in several park areas. Very easy access to start and finish area. Worth the entry fee!
By: Cliff Franklin II
Posted: October 23, 2007
Great Small Race
Nice course, I enjoyed running through the parks and the weather was awesome. Did get a little lonely in the last 4 miles. Had a great time, 2 weeks after Chicago I managed to cut off a 1/2 hour! (Don't know if that'll ever happen again)
Some of the pluses -
1) PB&J and the finish was a great touch
2) Shirt is very cool, kind of like a pull over windbreaker/technical
3) Small bottles of water were nice, I'd never seen this before and it made it easier to run & drink.
Suggestions for improvement -
1) Most of the first 3 miles is on narrow trails, I would suggest not having any part of the course in the first 5 miles to let people spread out
2) I thought the Heed was nasty
3) Although the race might not be big enough for pace teams, I think there should be some kind of organization at the starting line, maybe have signs for a minute/mile pace to line everyone up. I was trying to pass walkers in the first 100 ft. These people should have had enough sense to be at the end of the line, but I guess not.
4) This is a must - Need to get rid of the house arrest tether chip and switch to the one in the shoe. Started bothering me around mile 16 and I switched it at 18, but I still have some nasty chaffing on my ankle.
By: Dd A.
Posted: October 23, 2007
Great race, fast course
I enjoyed this marathon. The (paved) paths along the Ohio River are wonderful and the parks are even better. I loved the drum band. We got off course twice in the park and hope the course can become foolproof. I agree that the Heed beverage could be improved upon. Overall, this was one of my favorite marathons.
By: John C.
Posted: October 22, 2007
great race - perfect organization
Everything was perfect - even the course was well marked or had a volunteer to keep you going in the right direction. The only complaint - a hot day and us slow runners need more water, especially over the last 6 miles. I don't know if they ran out, but every mile instead of every two miles would have been better....
I love this race and will be back. It's a very good race - that needs more recognition. The shoe design on the shirt and medal was awesome.
By: Shawn P.
Posted: October 22, 2007
Very nice, low-key Marathon
Finally, a marathon that allowed me to sleep in! The starting location was great in that it allowed access with virtually no traffic problems, plenty of parking space, an 8am start time and a host hotel right at the location. I have never had such easy access to a marathon start and that was wonderful.
The course was very nice, definitely flat and shaded throughout much of the run. I rather enjoy the urban runs that go through downtown and communities and this run lacks that. Almost no spectators, other than those there to cheer on someone they knew, but the few that were there were very supportive. The volunteers were fantastic.
'GatorAde' and 'Heed' are not interchangeable words and I was disappointed to find that it was actually Heed that was served rather than the advertised Gatorade. No biggie but Heed is definitely an inferior product, IHMO. Also, I wish all runs provided technical shirts. Those would be great advertisement, especially for the smaller races, since people wear them in other races.
Overall, great run, great organization and, while it isn't one I'll do again, I would definitely recommend it to anyone in the area.
By: Britt Crawford
Posted: October 22, 2007
A nice contrast to the 'big' marathons
I'm a Louisville native and will be the 1st to admit this race is a well kept secret. It doesn't get much if any press outside the running community...but that's okay. It's definitely not Chicago, but that's okay too. Personally I ran Chicago last year and it was a lot of fun. This race was equally rewarding for me for totally different reasons. You run Chicago for the crowds, the atmosphere, to participate in a 'big' race. I ran Louisville for different reasons. With the Louisville marathon you get a fast, scenic, uncrowded (less than a 1000 runners including the 1/2 marathon runners), friendly race at a bargain price. If you need lots of crowd support this is probably not your race. Personally I really appreciate the contrast from the races like Chicago. If you're ready for a change of pace from the big marathons this race is definitely worth considering.
By: Iggy Bo
Posted: October 22, 2007
Well-organized and scenic
This is a low-key, scenic and well-organized marathon. The course is basically flat, with much of it going alongside the Ohio River or through scenic parks and wooded paths. The volunteers were enthusiastic, as were the few spectators that were sprinkled throughout the course. I would have preferred Gatorade to Heed, but the PB&J at the end of the race was a nice touch. All-in-all a very enjoyable experience and am glad I made the trip down from New York City for this race.
By: Dan Neill
Posted: October 21, 2007
adequately staffed, relaxing course
The 2007 Louisville was my first marathon ever. Traffic was well-blocked off, and the course managed to take advantage of the riverside bike paths and parks. It was relatively flat (just two steep inclines). The water situation held out (Deer Park 8-oz'ish mini-bottles and tasteless Heed electrolyte solution). I had been worried since they had forecast 84 F for late in the race, but some cloud-cover and a nice, gentle breeze helped.
By: Robin K.
Posted: September 19, 2007
Great, small race with beautiful course
I love this race! It's small, accessible and well organized. The weather is usually beautiful: cool and crisp, with '06 as an exception. With the small field, it feels like a long morning run. It passes the city and winds along the river through woods, golf courses, parks and some tree-covered neighborhood streets. I say pooh pooh to all those who complain about spectators and the flavor of the water and loops - we ran through parks, for crying out loud. It's only confusing if you're not paying attention. If you want a party or a pat on the back, go to NY or Chicago. If you want to challenge yourself and run a great race, Louisville is it.
By: Keith C.
Posted: April 02, 2007
Flat, fast, but could be better supported
We had a fairly cold day, low 50's at the start and high 40's later with a brutal headwind most of the first half, although we had a tailwind coming home. The course was pretty scenic, and volunteers were generally pretty enthusiastic, although they could have been a bit better prepared at some water stops. While water was always offered, I literally had to stop to get Gu and Gatorade on more than one occasion, which caused me to lose time, although at 3:09, I can't complain too much. Water stops were also spaced a bit far, up to 3 miles at points. Also, there was no chip time, although that only cost me 3 seconds. At the finish, a volunteer handed me my medal still contained in a plastic packet. I've run 9 marathons now and won few medals in other events and can't remember an event where they didn't put the medal around my neck. I am grateful to the volunteers for braving the cold and windy day, but after running 26.2 miles, it's pretty deflating when they don't even offer to hang your medal around your neck. All that said, I have recommended this course to others trying to qualify for Boston over Chicago and other courses.
By: Michael Williams
Posted: October 28, 2006
Great Course for PR, Very Friendly People
This is my fifth and best marathon (PR/BQ). There is one narrow spot on the course but is not a problem for faster runners - otherwise it could bunch up a little. The crowd is very minimal but the people are very nice! The wind factor was 12-15 mph but the overall times were still outstanding (very high % of BQ times). I went out in the early pack which was very helpful because of a 7-hour drive to return home that day. I met so many runners on the return leg who mentioned my name and gave great encouragement. For those of you who can remember encouraging Mike - it made a real difference (BQ by 22 seconds)! Thanks so much - Lousiville and fellow runners! Thanks to Steve for getting up and tracking all of the early starters.
Extra nickels - If the Ramada is booked, the Marriot downtown is very nice. Also, the gas station just across River Road from the start/finish line let me use the restroom at 6:20 a.m. (very clean)! Of note, at check-in (very organized), the Ramada had a sign saying no restroom use for the public. This is unfortunate because they were fully booked due to the race and there are limited restroom options until you get on the course. The start line is about three miles outside of the city, and gas is a little more expensive, but this guy really supports the runners. Please stop in and give him some business (coffee and M&M's after the race were excellent).
By: Melissa Rhodes
Posted: October 27, 2006
Inexpensive, scenic marathon.
This was a nice first marathon for me. The course was mostly flat and scenic, the marathon was inexpensive and the workers/volunteers were encouraging. (And, believe me, by the time I got to the end, they had been out there awhile.) I hope to do this one again someday with a better time.
By: Silke A.
Posted: October 25, 2006
My first marathon and it was a great one
This Louisville Marathon was my first one and I had a great experience. I thought there were plenty of water stops with helpful and cheerful volunteers who stayed that way even when the temperatures started dropping. Miles 22-26 are a long stretch with hardly any people around which makes it tough (it probably would have been tough no matter what), but I do like the 'small race' atmosphere. The family members who come out to cheer show up at different stops and do a great job cheering on! Great volunteers!
By: Jon A.
Posted: October 24, 2006
Needs just a couple of improvements
As stated previously, this is a no frills race on a very flat course. We had a cold and windy day (although they had predicted rain, so we were glad it stayed dry). The volunteers were friendly and there were water stops at least every other mile.
This was my 5th marathon this year and I prefer smaller races like this one. My suggestions (not necessarily criticisms) are few. The t-shirts were nice, cool-max type, long sleeved, but there was no mention of finisher on it and the half marathoners got the same shirt that only said 'marathon' on it. The start/finish area was definitely no frills with bananas and bagels with peanut butter and jelly available. Again, to be expected at a smaller type of race. There was no area to put a bag with your warm up clothes, so people were leaving their stuff lying on the groud (again, glad it didn't rain). To be fair the hotel/parking is just across the street, but this seems like a no or low cost 'perk' that would seem in order for a marathon. Maybe with normal temps this is not an issue. I heard rumors that there was a pasta dinner but there was no information in the packet.
All in all this is a good race and decent value for the money.
By: Doug B.
Posted: October 23, 2006
Great first marathon experience
This was my first of probably many distances events. It is a very good route for a first marathon. It is very scenic, along the Ohio River, and through several very beautiful parks. The temperature was cool, especially on the stretches by the river, but not too bad. The volunteers were the only spectators, and were all very friendly, encouraging and supportive. There were plenty of fluid and gel stations to keep me headed down the route. The packet pickup was simple, as was the technical shirt. Simple was nice in both cases. Overall, a very enjoyable marathon experience.
By: Eddie O.
Posted: October 23, 2006
Run Louisville Marathon
A cold front had just moved through. Temperature at the start was about 53 and slid into the upper 40's. Perfect! Only drawback was the 10-15 mph winds. Gatorade, water and some gels were at every aid station as promised. Restrooms were plentiful.
It was a little crowded at the start. If time is very important, try to get at the front of the pack at the starting line. This course is flat. Some of the other runners have talked about a few hills. I would not call them hills. There is a concrete switchback that rises from the river. It slows you down just a little. I read from previous comments about the concrete. Yes, there is some concrete, but it is not too bad. The run along the river and into the wooded parks was scenic. The view of downtown Louisville gave you an idea of where you were on the course.
I missed my target time by seconds, but I can not complain. I made both my PR and BQ on this course. This is a good alternative to the too-big race in the Windy City. Keep it small and inexpensive. The host Ramada Inn was just across the street from the start/finish line. They gave marathoners a late check-out time. I would recommend them.
By: let down
Posted: October 22, 2006
somewhat depressing
i know the day for the race didn't help, considering there were horrible, chilly winds to contend with for the better part of the race, but aside from that, there was just nothing to bring me back to this race aside from the flat course and the peanut butter bagels. the portion of the course where all of the runners are trying to squeeze through a 3 foot across path was ridiculous, there were not nearly enough water/gatorade stops, no spectators, no music, entertainment, fanfare of any sort. i just grabbed my trophy off the table and left at the end. i have never even been to a little local 5K that had so little excitement surrounding it. makes me a bit embarrassed considering this is my home town.
By: M. Messmore
Posted: March 22, 2006
Terrific for a first marathon!
The day was perfectly picturesque! It was sunny and slightly brisk at the start. By the time I crossed the finish line it was in the low 60's. The day could not have been better if they planned it.
The course is a beautiful scenic route that follows the Ohio River. The course is flat and fast with just enough of a change in grade to keep it interesting. If my family knew the area better they would have been able to get to various spots in the course. But, just by staying in one spot they saw me start, run by at mile 3 and finish. There are few spectators on the course, but most of the time I run alone anyway... so that didn't bother me.
The running shirt was terrific in a pragmatic sense, however aesthetically I thought it left some to be desired (however the appeal of a running shirt is next to last on my level of importance).
Volunteers were terrific and energetic, even if there were few of them. Gels, water and Gatorade were plentiful at all existing stops.
Here is my one complaint. There is a four-mile stretch that has no fluid stop. Since this is an out-and-back style course, that means this four-mile stretch was covered twice. Therefore from mile 9-13 out and mile 16-20 back there were no fluid stops. I realize that is the most scenic portion of the course, and it would not be simple to set up a station there. However, just one in the middle would do wonders for replenishment.
By: Chris R.
Posted: November 20, 2005
no-frills, fast and scenic
I agree with the comments for this year - flat, fast, scenic course, perfect weather, great technical t-shirt, great value for the money. Great staff, and they were upbeat. Very few spectators, but I didn't expect much for a smaller race. My only complaints: The volunteers on the course were helpful except for the one woman at 21 miles near the river boat (she failed to direct the runner in front of me until she went the wrong way!). I agree a finish photo would have been a nice option for us out-of-towners.
My biggest problem was the host hotel - it has a perfect location to the race, the staff was helpful and polite, the free breakfasts ample and fine, BUT the rooms were filthy, smelly, and rundown. The housekeeping could do little to improve the conditions - the rooms were just too rundown and the air-conditioning units did little to clean the air. ALL of my party got upper-respiratory sick after leaving.
By: Rachel L.
Posted: October 28, 2005
A great small marathon
There are things about this race I could criticize but the truth is, I won it, so I'm feeling pretty charitable. This is a small marathon and it doesn't pretend to be anything else. If you are the kind of person who needs crowds, expos, stuffed packets and lots of bells and whistles, run Chicago, New York, etc. That's not what I was looking for and it's not what this race is about. I absolutely loved the course. It goes along the Ohio River, through several parks and a neighborhood. Others have mentioned that it feels like a training run and it really does. Most people would consider it flat. Those of us from Ohio, Illinois, Michigan might quibble about that a little bit. The first 7 miles and the last 5 miles are pancake flat. The middle 14 has a few rolling hills here and there. Only two of them struck me as noteworthy. The weather was perfect. The trophies were impressive. Another water station here or there wouldn't have hurt but they gave out nice big bottles of water, which helped to make up for it. I would have liked a finish line photo - that's my only major criticism.
By: Paul P.
Posted: October 19, 2005
Great first marathon
I had a lot of fun at this race. The course was very scenic and shaded, which was good because by the finish time it was very sunny. The weather was ideal for me, about 40 degrees at start. The half marathoners hit their turn-around at mile 8, so after that point you are running pretty much by yourself. The crowd was very sparse, but very enthusiastic. When they cheer, you know they are cheering for you, as there are probably not many other runners around.
My only complaints are that there was a missing aid station, and the aid stations dispensed Gatorade in very tiny cups (not enough for me). There wasn't any food or drink that I could see at the end of the race; maybe the 1/2 marathoners got it all? I finished in the top 1/2 of the marathoners, so I expected there to be something left. Also, don't expect many port-a-potties along the race. The race literature spelled out facilies as specific places, and then said 'and along the race course.' I think they meant in the (very pretty) wooded areas along the course. I know I was not the only one who had to go off the trail for relief.
But as a small race with limited resources, they did a very good job.
By: Russ J.
Posted: October 18, 2005
nice small, no-frills race
A nice, small race. No chips, expo, photos, or spectator turnout, etc., but a nice, flat course, great volunteers, plenty of water stations and prominent mile markers. And inexpensive. Nice technical shirt, too (not a long-sleeved T like it said on the website, but that's an upgrade, as far as I'm concerned). The medal is small but classy.
The weather was absoloutely perfect in 2005, pretty cold at the start for runners in shorts and singlets, but just right after you got going. Since the course starts with a 2-mile loop, you can wear a T-shirt to start and toss it when you pass the starting point, it will still be there after the race. The course is a bit crowded at the start, along a narrow walkway through a park, but thins out after a mile or so when it turns onto a road. After the half-marathon turn-around (mile 8) you will be all by yourself.
This course consists of three sections. Miles 0-9 are on streets and sidewalks along the Ohio river in downtown Louisville. Miles 9-19 are along a beautiful, quiet, shady path through city parks. The rest of the race retraces the start.
Overall, a nice, flat, fast race with no unneccesary frills (and expenses).
By: Mark Priddy
Posted: October 17, 2005
Flat and Shaded Course
Course is as advertised: Fast and flat. Just check out the finishing times!
Lots of shade, but since the temperature was in the low 40's at the start, kind of cool.
Packet pick up was flawless. Very nice tech shirt. Finisher's medal was kind of plain, needed a date, but I guess most of the entry fee was invested in the nice shirt. People were very friendly and water stops were well supplied.
No frills here, just the basics. I would run it again.
By: Curt Stephens
Posted: October 17, 2005
Nice race, flat course, good weather.
This was my first marathon after running a number of half marathons. The weather was perfect with a start in the mid-forties. Volunteers on the course gave excellent instructions so there was no confusion about the route. Love the little water bottles. There was a water stop missing out in the middle of the course, so I was glad I brought a 20 oz bottle with me.
Overall, it was a very positive experience. The course was quite scenic, especially the long asphalt trail through the woods along the river. I would definitely condsider running this race again.
By: patty a.
Posted: October 17, 2005
Beautiful day.... Finish was pretty disorganized
I just finished running the 1/2 marathon for 2005. They did a great job out on the course with water, directions. But, I was the 100th finisher out of 900 and they had little Dixie cups of water at the end.... Come on guys, you've been running this race long enough to have water/Gatorade at the end of the race.
By: Sam Lorber
Posted: March 27, 2005
Fast, flat, no hype
I have run this marathon 4 times on 3 different courses. The latest is not my favorite, but still better than a lot of big races. The first 3 were PRs and BQs, the last I pulled up lame. If you live in driving distance (South or Midwest), it's inexpensive and the weather is generally cooperative. Small crowds either mean no inspiration or no distraction, depending on your preference.
By: Patrick S.
Posted: December 17, 2004
A small pleasant race.
I flew to Louisville to run this race as my last long training run prior to NY City. Considering the weather, flat course, and hotel convenience, I wish I had made this my primary fall race. The Ramada Inn is located a short walk from the starting line (which was nice since it was 39 degrees at the start). The course was flat, fast, and scenic in some places -- the race really seemed like the perfect training run. Fans were sparse but enthusiastic. This was a very simple race -- there was no pre-race expo, no post-race massage, and some food at the finish line (bagels, bananas, etc).
Overall though, the race was run very smoothly and I had a great time. As always, it is the people you meet along the way that make the race. Since I had never been to Louisville, I was surprised by a few things. Although the food at the Ramada was nothing special, there are some diverse restaurants in the area. I ate at a very nice Indian restaurant the evening before the race (it was a few miles away on Brownsboro Road) and at an excellent Arabian restaurant after the race (also along Brownsboro Road). I never expected to find such great high carb dining options in Kentucky!
By: Manakan H.
Posted: October 21, 2004
Nice small marathon to PR and even BQ!
Louisville was my second marathon and I was deciding between several venues for a fall marathon. I chose Louisville because it was within driving distance and was advertised as flat and a PR course. I also figured the there was a better chance for good running weather in October in KY rather than a December marathon elsewhere.
The course really does feel like a nice long scenic training run, only this time with much more effort and speed not to mention 5-6 miles longer than my average long runs. Only once was I unsure of where to go (around mile 23 when I was sort of delirious) but a spectator was there to point me in the right direction. I not only managed to shave 24 minutes off my first marathon time but in addition managed to BQ (with 32 seconds to spare). I saw a tip once that said that you can shave up to a minute off your marathon time by doing a small marathon (fast start; no slow-down at the beginning). I am certainly a believer.
The race itself was well organized. There was a pasta party, but otherwise a no frills marathon (no expo or post-even party; awards given out but definitely had to be up at the awards table to hear your name called out as there was no loudspeaker, no chip timing). Good long-sleeved T-shirt, good finisher's medal and trophies. Ramada Inn is nice, but make reservations early as the hotel was booked and I had to stay about 5-10 minutes away in a place that was not nearly as nice.
By: Bill Corbett
Posted: October 20, 2004
This is a great race for PR, not spectators.
This could be a premier marathon if it were played up more. There were too many loops on the course. This confused some of the runners. Should get rid of the loops. Also starting the 1/2 marathon after the marathon would make it less congested out on the course.
By: Don G.
Posted: October 20, 2004
Good Race
This is a good small (really small) race. The course is almost flat as it winds along the Ohio River. Some river views that are nice. It feels like a hometown club race, so it does not have any of the amenities of the bigger races (i.e. no bag drop, but the jacket I wore to the start was where I put it when I went back after the race). Post-race had the basics (water, sports drink, bananas, bagels). Also the start was so easy with the smaller crowd.
For out-of-towners, the race hotel is just across the street from the start. (But a dumpy old motel. Motel had a 'pasta party' but it was just spaghetti in a bowl. Bad over-priced food.)
So the fast course and the lack of crowds make it a fast race.
Downsides:
--A lot of the race (maybe a third) is on concrete, so it is a little harder on the legs.
--As small as it is, if you are looking for someone to run with to help toward the end of the race, you may have trouble finding others.
--Waterstops. There were a few times that the water stops seemed a little far apart. (One I remember the most, you went from about mile 12.5 to mile 16 without a water stop.)
I would recommend this race for anyone looking for a fast run.
By: Ed King
Posted: October 19, 2004
WELL ORGANIZED, LOW-KEY MARATHON
This is a great fall alternative to the big, commercial marathons. Organization was superb... packet pick-up was easy, host hotel was fine, start went off on time, course was well marked, measurements seemed accurate, water and aid stations were where they were supposed to be. Volunteers were pleasant and enthusiastic. Course was an interesting mix of urban and some beautiful parks on a generally flat, fast course.
By: Jennifer B.
Posted: October 19, 2004
Great place to PR
The Good:
1. The course is relatively flat and very fast. Lots of people set PRs on this course – myself included. It had enough little hills to keep your legs from getting stale, but no major climbs.
2. The logistics were very easy. Packet pick-up was quick and painless. The host hotel was a 5 minute walk from the start line. The port-o-potty lines were never too long, because most people just waited until the last minute to leave their rooms.
3. PERFECT weather – 40 at the start, gentle breeze and sunshine.
4. Lots of friendly volunteers on the course.
5. Nice trophies for overall and age group winners.
The not-so-good:
1. Water was handed out in little plastic jugs, and tasted like chalk. It was really nasty. I have a feeling this will be corrected for next year though, since everyone complained about it!
2. There were some odd little twisty turny parts of the course – like a sidewalk ramp that forced you to make four 180 degree turns to get up (and down) it. Usually there were volunteers to direct you but sometimes you had to follow chalk markings.
3. Not much food afterwards or much of an awards ceremony.
4. No small T-shirts.
Overall, the good points of this race far outweigh the minor problems. I had a great time and I would recommend this race to anyone who likes small marathons and is looking for a PR or a Boston qualifier!
By: William C.
Posted: October 18, 2004
Fine Day - Fine Race - I'll be back.
This is a really nice regional race. RD and local running community puts on a good show.
The course is indeed flat and lends itself to a good performance. Traffic control was good. Aid stations fine - had four chances to pick up Hammer Gel on the course.
Loved this year's shirt!
Here are a few constructive comments.
- Lose the Ultima drink. Really need to go to Gatorade or something with a carb in it. No one trains with Ultima. The stuff does mess up one's digestive system. I would like to see a carb sports drink every 2 miles. I'd happily pay an extra $5 for that.
- Bagels were not too good.
- OK medal. Might consider a change in design.
By: Robert L.
Posted: October 18, 2004
Overall good experience
All the comments below are pretty spot on. Essentially, this is an out-and-back with a couple little loops and a bypass. Mix of asphalt trail and concrete roads. Good mile markers coupled with arrows painted on the ground. In a few places where you loop through parks, it got ever-so-slightly more confusing... but not really. Good volunteers.
Hammer gel at two locations, which really meant four times we had access to it. Water stops were a little far apart, but not too bad - and they all had sports drink. The cups said Ultima, the volunteers said Gatorade... my stomach wasn't sure.
Race director describes the course as very flat, which it mostly is, but pancake flat it is not. There are a couple 'lip up' hills, each a block or so long, and there are several 1-2 mile inclines (subtle ones, but your legs will know). As an out-and-back, though, you just remind yourself that what goes up must come down on the way back.
The course wasn't overly interesting, but it was nice. They had a detour through a neighborhood because part of the river trail was covered in mud (and river)... the detour was the prettiest part :-). If this race gets more crowded than this year, even by a little, the race director should consider starting the half 15-30 minutes after the full.
Yes, that will require two clocks. However, it would ensure that marathoners clear the really skinny part of the trail between miles 7-9. It was packed and almost dangerous with the two-way traffic of half marathoners returning at full speed after their turn-around. Would be better and less clogged for both marathoners and half marathoners if the m-ers are already past that point when halfers turn around.
BTW, there are no clocks and no one calling splits along the course. As it is a small race, I didn't care. That's why we have watches. But it is something you might care about. The weather was wonderful. Started cold, but warmed to 55ish over time. Blue sky.
Packet pickup was very simple; no expo. This is not a ding - it's what to expect at a little race. The host hotel (Ramada) was easy in/out, and although it is an old place, it was very clean. Good shirt. So-so medal, but this is a club race, not an RnR production.
Side notes: everyone that was associated with the race was extremely helpful. Many other folks I encountered in louisville were less so. Not everyone, but lots of people (at the hotel, at restaurants, at the airport) seemed to be put out by actually having a customer to deal with. Sigh.
50-staters - along with Old Mulkey (run a week later), this is a good choice for Kentucky. I think Mulkey is a better race by just a little bit... but if you are traveling far, especially in a plane, then Louisville is extremely easy to deal with. And you can go buy a Louisville Slugger.
Overall, a good experience. Met my expectations for a small, club race. My time did not meet my expectations, but that's my problem.
By: Martin P.
Posted: October 18, 2004
Great, no spectators, PR course
Ran the race on 17 Oct 04. The weather was perfect... nice and cool. There was little to no wind. I found the course to be very flat which makes it great for a PR course. The crowd support was generally located at the water stops and so if you need spectators to motivate you to run then do not do this one. Overall, I thought the race was excellent and would love to do it again and try and beat the PR I achieved this time.
The organizers must have corrected the traffic problem noted in previous years because there were no cars anywhere. It was a road runners paradise running down (during certain parts) miles of 3-4 lane wide, newly paved, residential street. I loved it!
Additionally, they gave water in little bottles which made it easier to run through the water stops and drink water while actually getting water in my mouth.
Special note: The trumpet (?) player at the beginning of the marathon was really great.
By: Mike H.
Posted: October 17, 2004
Small race but fast course.
The Louisville Marathon is a small race with only between 250-300 runners. Hospitality was great and the course was good. We had to do an alternate route for 4 miles because part of the river walk was under mud. It went fine. The course was well-marked and scenic, along the Ohio River. If you do this race, I recommend staying at the Ramada Inn, as it is across the street from the start and you can walk there in 5 minutes. I would definitely say that this is a good race to do.
By: Don H.
Posted: October 17, 2004
PR course with nice view of river
While this marathon doesn't receive the fanfare of its spring companion, the KY Derby Marathon, it's still a very scenic, very fast, & well-organized course.
At first glance this course looks like a simple out-and-back layout. It actually had several nice variations and loops through 5 or 6 parks that lined the Louisville riverfront.
I'd definitely recommend for those looking for a fast fall marathon. Why wouldn't I? I just qualified for Boston on it with a 3:15:15 - finally!
By: Mr. Coach
Posted: June 30, 2004
Fast- If you don't get lost...
I came into the race slightly undertrained, but managed to PR by 12 minutes; HOWEVER it would have been by more like 14-15 had I not gotten lost TWICE!
I actually liked the low-key atmosphere. Few spectators. Small race. Almost felt like you were out on a training run through the park, which was relaxing. But because there were stretches where there was no one around you and the course was poorly marked, a lot of people took wrong turns. At one point, you are running under a bridge. I ran about 2 minutes out of my way there- until the path ended.
The course was semi-out-and back, which I like. The last 3-4 miles are downhill and that, combined with the fact that I had some extra juice made it fun to actually run a negative split marathon (my first time doing that!).
A minor complaint- I always hate running a marathon alongside 1/2 marathoners. Luckily here, they turned around at about mile 7. When a marathon's 2 laps of the 1/2 marathon course, I always wonder why all these people are passing me at mile 11-12, and then get lonely the last loop after 2/3 of the people are done.
Despite the frustrating problems of this race, I will be back. I did enjoy it, and really liked the course. Now that I know where it's supposed to go, I won't make navigational mistakes!
By: Karin B.
Posted: October 22, 2003
Scenic, Fast, Flat Course
Add this one to your list! Louisville showed wonderful hospitality to its out-of-town guests. Packet pick-up was easy and plenty of volunteers to provide course information. The Ramada Inn was clean, comfortable and reasonable and the staff was fantastic. The scenery alone was enough to keep you going and parts of it were like running in the woods. The weather was great for October. Plenty of water and volunteers at the aid stations. Just a few areas where we might have needed a little more direction - especially as our brains grew as tired as our feet. I'll do this one again!
By: John Hood
Posted: October 21, 2003
Beautiful route, well organized
My compliments to the running club for a well organized race. The course was well marked. Nice big colored signs for marathon mile-markers and a different color for the half marathon. There was a substantial amount of concrete to endure and my feet paid the price, but I tuned that out and soaked up the incredible weather and gorgeous fall scenery. Overall, a very good experience.
By: Danny H.
Posted: October 21, 2003
Beautiful run, good course, sparse crowds
Really though, a good little marathon. The course was run along the 'River Walk' probably @ 1/3 concrete & 2/3 asphalt and it was really nice. Kind of cool the way the city did this & unique the way the course played out. Unfortunately the city of Louisville seemed apathatic (no mention in the next day's paper and no crowd) about the 600 or so of us runners (including half). Nonetheless the organizers did everything in their power to make it a good, fun run. If you need a crowd, not the place for you, but otherwise mostly flat & scenic PR course. A few glitches here & there but the race director graciously corrected any problems pronto. Sooner or later I will do this one again... I love the River Walk.
By: Race Committee Member
Posted: October 21, 2003
2003 Course and Race
Running on the sidewalks in the downtown area was mandated by the police this year because the Lewis & Clark Expedition 200-year anniversary arrived in Louisville last week and there was concerned about the runners safety while running in the street with an extraordinary amount of auto traffic in the waterfront park area.
Stating the course was 3/4 concrete is incorrect as most of the riverwalk is asphalt.
The committee received numerous compliments regarding the race and course this year. I hope some of this years participants will post their comments here.
By: william hege
Posted: October 20, 2003
Enjoyed the course except for concrete
This was my first. I thought it was, for the most part, very flat. I enjoyed the experience very much(although I didn't think that from mile 22 on at the time). However, there was a a lot of concrete! There were also a few spots in the woods before mile 12 that were not marked very well. I thought there was good police support, but besides a few family members shouting to people from time to time, the only fans were the folks at the aid stations. I would like to run again though to improve on my time of 4:56.
By: steve&paula boone
Posted: October 20, 2003
The most improvement of a course
Steve Dutton and his support crew significantly improved the appeal of this marathon. The new course on the Ohio River is fast, scenic, enjoyable and much safer for the runners. There were plenty of friendly volunteers at the aid stations and along the course.
By: Jason H.
Posted: October 20, 2003
Good Small Race
Good course bordering the river with plenty of scenery. Majority of race on a 10' asphalt walking trail, part of which covered with a tree canopy with a few stretches of barren concrete. Majority of the distance was an open course, but since you are on the walking trail, it doesn't pose a problem. Volunteers & police were present at majority of street crossings. Small field with half, 7-miler and marathon all sharing same course, but organization was good on segregating the distances and didn't have much congestion. No expo, just packet pick-up and the finish was somewhat anticlimactic. More runners than spectators and medal given to you in a small plastic bag as you pass the finish. That said, set expectations accordingly and you will have fun on this course. It is pancake flat with sufficient aid stations and the weather is reasonable.
By: Kelli B.
Posted: October 20, 2003
I must be spoiled by Chicago!!
I did not enjoy this race at all. The support staff was excellent and very kind, but the spectator support was nonexistent. If you are accustomed to having crowds encourage you at mile 20... this is not the race for you. Race organizers could encourage the local media and area high school bands to come out and support the runners. The scenery was pretty but monotonous. I did enjoy the 15 - 16 miles through the wonderfully manicured community. Nice change of scenery. I would have truly enjoyed seeing those homeowners out cheering on those running down their sidewalks!! Unfortunately... I will not run this race again.
By: bill c.
Posted: October 10, 2003
2003 course - 18 miles of concrete?
I am registered for the 2003 race but am concerned.
The new course appears 3/4ths concrete road and concrete 'River Walk'.
Whats up with that?
By: Anonymous
Posted: November 05, 2002
Fast course, perfection is a few tweaks away
I was a little hesitant to run this race given the reviews from the prior years. The marathon this year proved that this race director really listened to past comments and responded favorably. The course was very flat with scenery galore(especially on the river walk)! Aid was plentiful and the little bottles of water served by cheerful Boy Scouts were a nice, sanitary touch. The police were omni-present and I saw several drivers pulled over by the police in an effort to keep the runners safe. My suggestion would be for the first six and1/2 miles to be closed to traffic or have more volunteers slowing the cars down. Maybe an earlier start would solve this? Also, I am still awaiting the results for the Clydesdale division. In any event, this was a first-rate marathon and I will be back next year to run it.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 23, 2002
Response to other comments
I would like to comment on points made by this years participants.
(1) The police car went too far east and did make the turnaround mile long. He was supposed to position his car at the marked turnaround spot.
(2) I agree that running the first 6+ miles (out 3+ and back) is dangerous with cars. I don't understand why this cannot be changed, but the police have refused to close the course for such a
small race.
(3) As far as the runner that was hit this year by a car. He was on a 4-lane
one-way street running in rightmost lane, when he was hit by a drunken driver, who had 3 other lanes to drive.
There was no excuse for him to be driving in the 2nd lane. The police were called and the driver was found and arrested.
(4) The course is basically the same it has been for years. It is run in an area which has little impact on residents. Unfortunately when the road was widened from 2 lanes to 4 lanes, approximately a one-mile stretch was concreted. This mile is roughly the 8th and the 24th mile of the marathon.
However, I believe the beauty of the park and riverpath back to downtown is worth the ordeal of running this stretch of concrete.
(5) As far as the number of spectators,
this is a small 300runner marathon, with a 7 miler and 1/2 marathon included
which raises the number to approx 1000 runners. It is a running club's marathon, with little backing from the city of Louisville - I thought the police did an outstanding job especially for the late runners/walkers who were finishing in the 6th hour.
(6) The course is very flat and scenic along the river.
(7) The KY DERBY MARATHON is held in April and is run thru the city with the roads closed. It is run in conjunction with 1/2 marathon which has been in existence for 30 years and has plenty of spectator support. Unfortunately the
last 13 miles was run with little spectator support as this was only the first year for the marathon. The KYDERBY MARATHON Course is also very scenic running thru 2 parks, but is not flat. There were 7000+ 1/2 marathoners and 1100+ marathoners this year.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 22, 2002
This race has great potential...with some fixes.
This was my first Louisville Marathon and while I really enjoyed some aspects of the race, I really had a problem with other aspects. First, the course was a very flat, fast course with lots of great scenery, especially along the river and through the park. Also, volunteers at the water stations did a great job and were very enthusiastic. My only complaints are that the first turnaround had no one their to direct you or a cone at least to mark it, so I missed it by 30 seconds out and 30 seconds back to it. The other complaint is the same as someone mentioned earlier--they have to do something about the cars along River Road, at least one lane if nothing else. As we all know, many drivers feel the need to honk and dodge at you because they feel you don't have a right to be on the road, so you need to separate the cars from the runners. This race has great potential, I think with a little work it could be a highlight for many in the future. Finally, you need to get the word out a little better, I saw very few spectators (those I did see were phenomenal, thanks!).
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 21, 2002
This is a beautiful, flat, fast course.
After reading the past years comments I dreaded this marathon, however being a 50 stater I had no other choice. The organization was good, roads were all safe to cross with police or race officals at the intersections. There was plenty of water and Ultima sports drink along the course.The only negative about the course was alot of cement in the later miles, very hard on the legs. This was a nice marathon experience with a few exceptions, peoples still smoke in public places, such as motel lobies and resturants. Also the host hotel was booked so they refered us to the Best Western, sister property, do not stay there, it is a night club with rooms not a hotel. There was a wedding party until 1:am, the band literally shook our windows, after four calls to the front desk we finally gave up. I would do this marathon again if I did not have to spend the night in Kentucky.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 21, 2002
Have a few Issues with the Louisville Marathon
I just finished running the 2002 Louisville marathon, and I wouldn't run it again. They have a 7 mile, 1/2 marathon in conjunction with the marathon. It seemed that several mile markers were off, some probably were closer to 1.2 especially between mile 3-4. I over heard several runners comment this was exactly as last year, so I'm assuming who ever measures the course is using their car or something to measure the miles. I never felt like I was sure of what pace I was running in the early stages. After mile 13 it seemed to be more accurate.
The water stops were good, and I would comment they did a wonderful job with the water bottles, which were a nice touch. Course was flat, with a few minor rises.
Around mile 13, I was tailing about 20-30 yards from a runner, who just about got hit by a car. I heard the tires squeal, as they locked up the brakes. I saw about 20 ft of skid marks...Later I caught up to the runner and he said that he was actually on the hood of the car!! Very close call..
I read another marathon review from another runner who did Louisville marathon said they observed another close call with car traffic during the 2001 marathon. They need to block off the at least one lane of traffic for the marathon runners. I'd rather run loops around a course with no traffic issues, than through the streets of Louisville with traffic.
Spectators were supportive, although they were few and far between. There was alot of bicycle traffic on the trail sections of the course from mile 16-22.
By: Anonymous
Posted: January 31, 2002
Choose another race for Kentucky
Arrived at hotel the day before race and picked up race #. Had to look on wall to get #. Why not alphabetize with age, and state? There was no course map in race packet nor was there one posted at registration. Was told to look on internet. Yeah right, I'm from out of town.
Host hotel was great, within walking distance to race. Hotel even allowed late check out.
Weather was great. A little on warm side. Starting line was not marked. Why not have a banner that says start, or use balloons. All 3 races started at same time. A friend ran the 10K which actually was more than a 10K. They were so frustrated at which way to go, they stopped and asked. They knew time wise, it was further than a 10K.
At the 3 or 4 mile, runners had to turnaround and go back the way they just came. Runners were literally running into each other.This was a nightmare and very dangerous since you weren't expecting it.
No times were announced on course. Shortage of volunteers. No traffic control. Had cars coming up behind us and blowing their horn. One car was so mad, they just kept blowing the horn and hollering at the runners. I came to one traffic light and had to stop. No patrolman nor volunteer to stop traffic. This is very frustrating if you are trying to qualify for Boston.
Course was not marked very well. One section that was 6 lanes wide (cement as well), had runners running on right side of road, thinking they were about to turn right. I look ahead and everyone has shifted to the left. A few yards later, they shift back to the right. I was so mad, this adds extra mileage, criss crossing a 6 lane road.
One section was a trail pathway, very deserted. Marathon only had 230 runners, so runners were spread out.
Had Ultima for drink. I personally don't like. At finish they had cut up bananas and oranges. I guess they didn't have enough to go around so they cut them. No cold drink at finish.
I do not recommend this race for a 1st time marathoner. I would not run it again.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 22, 2001
Flat, interesting course
Course well marked. Great support from the water stations. Almost no spectators. Race could use more publicity locally. I would run it again
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 22, 2001
Good course, no traffic control
Thought the course was very good - flat and fast. Staying on course was a challenge at times though as there were several turns where they had a single arrow painted on the road that you had to find and follow. Great race support at water stations. Volunteers did a great job and the little water bottles instead of cups were super. The race had one major problem - lack of traffic control on the course. A person in front of me was almost hit at a large intersection where there was no one to stop traffic. And where there were people stationed, they frequently stopped the runners instead of the traffic.
The race has a lot of potential because it is a great course and everything except for traffic control was very well organized. But, they desperately need some support from local police for traffic control.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 22, 2001
Lack of Traffic control could be a killer!
The scenery the first 6 miles and along the bike path are wonderful, but as we were running singlefile at mile 4, a woman sideswiped us and barely missed 3 or four of us by nano inches! She was out of control and no one to monitor the traffic. Shameful! Need road marshalls, shut down a lane...something. That was quite dangerous and I would not recommend this marathon. Hopefully the April 2002 Derby will be the shining Louisville star.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 21, 2001
Average
The course was beautiful and flat. The runners were extremely friendly. The 10k was .5-.6 of a mile off. Mile markers were off not to mention certain volunteers giving splits had to ask me what was on my watch. The only reason the organization was two stars is because of the friendliness of the volunteers! They were very friendly. There were few spectators, but the did an excelent job of cheering on the runners, which bumped them to three stars. Overall, the people were great as well as the course. The race was somewhat unorganized THIS year. There were not very many runners/spectators. The small concrete road was dificult to start the race on because it was too crowded for such a small area. The weather was great for a marathon. The 2001 Louisville Marathon definately has the potential to be a great marathon.
By: Anonymous
Posted: July 30, 2001
might consider doing it again!!
Five stars for spectators- not that many but they were still fun and made it the friendliest race I've ever run! Enjoyable course but get rid of that concrete stretch!!! Way too hard on the joints- at first I said never again, but time has a way of dulling the pain- had a good time in the lovely city of Louisville and the weather was great.
By: Anonymous
Posted: January 18, 2001
not much support
The race started in the dark and in the fog; it really gives you a sense of adventure. The course is not marked very well. I almost missed a turn running back into downtown. Fast course, needs to promote more safety and organization during the race.
By: Anonymous
Posted: November 10, 2000
BEST IS YET TO COME
Marathon suffers with inept race director. 2001 Marathon will be better with new race director. However, it is still a club marathon with very little support from local government.
Best is yet to come as LOUISVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION is in early phase of planning for spring 2002 marathon with
total government support.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 29, 2000
The course is scenic, marked, and organized.
As far as scenery is concerned, Louisville rivals the Vermont City Marathon. From the emerald fairways of the golf course you run by, to views of the majestic Ohio River as you run for miles along the Riverwalk, to the steel artistry of the massive bridges that span the river, this course is super!
The course is well marked on the roads in yellow paint at each mile and half way. All the turns are maked with arrows and sometimes orange cones too.
From packet pick up to the finish line, the marathon was organized well with the volunteers placed in strategic places.
Finally, if the city of Louisville would promote the marathon there would be more volunteers and spectators thus making it a first class race.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 27, 2000
Decent quiet run.
Quiet run without any traffic problems while running. The short stretch of concrete was hard on the knees especially coming home. There was plenty of help where I was but may have run short later. Trees along river great. Fog an extra attraction.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 26, 2000
Lots of problems
I agree. This race was not well organized. Poor (no) traffic control, lack of course monitors, fewer water stops than promised, water stops that ran out of water, no splits. For most veteran marathoners like myself, we don't need a lot of extra perks to make us happy. We do expect the basics to be covered, however. Add in the fact that the entry fee was steep ($40 pre, $50 late) and the poor organization of this marathon was even harder to accept.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 24, 2000
The organized marathon in Louisville
Diddle ... There are much room for improvement. Considering this is the only full length marathon race locally, the community should show more support. Otherwise, the season is excellent for the race (4 stars for this one).
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 24, 2000
Poor Organization, need more support people
I did like the course. This is a PR course, if the weather conditions are right.
This could become one of the better marathons in the midwest, if the race
director would plan better. Traffic control, and lack of support personnel
were the two main problems.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 23, 2000
Ditto Disappointed
Momma always said, 'If you can't say anything nice, ...'. To heck with Momma. But I will keep it to one point --- safety is an issue.
Traffic control was virtually non-existent. We took to the streets (in the dark!) with no course markers or volunteers/police to control on-coming and cross traffic. This posed a safety hazard, particularly on 45-mph roads which don't have shoulders.
Additionally, water was not available every two miles as organizers had promised.
Safety should be organizers' paramount concern. A disturbing lack of concern was displayed, and I would not recommend this event on that basis alone.
If you *really* want to do an event in the Midwest in October, choose the Indianapolis Marathon (two weeks prior to Louisville). Traffic control & volunteer support is A-1, particularly for an event of its size.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 22, 2000
Disappointed
There were no split times given throughout the marathon. It's very difficult to pace or know how you're doing without your splits. The race was very small. The course was flat but very boring in parts. Everyone associated with the race was very friendly and helpful and the few spectators that there were, were excellent! I had a PR but was dissapointed in the overall race.