Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
California International Marathon
California International Marathon
Back

California International Marathon - Race Reviews

4.2
Average rating based on 233 Reviews

By: Robert Morgenstern

Posted: December 10, 2024

Great race

Given the reviews, I was expecting the worst. However, the race organization was flawless. Plenty of portapotties, plenty of fluids, medals etc. Transportation to and from start flawless. Weather, flawless. Kudos to the organizers.
4.0

By: MJ J.

Posted: May 21, 2024

Disappointing

Course is not flat, not inclusive for all runners, catered more for elites and not the average runner, which is disappointing to have elitist attitudes on the transport bus disparaging slow folks with passive/aggressive comments. Way to start a marathon. Sportsmanship and support was nonexistent amongst those I sat with on the bus, though met many runners (yes, we are runners even if our time is slower) along the way who were supportive of each other. No bananas at the end. Seriously. CIM puts on a big to-do with over 10,000 participants, but can't have enough bananas at the finish.
2.0

By: Fergus Hodgson

Posted: December 08, 2023

Tougher than Expected, Too Many Participants

This race was not prepared for 10,000 runners: (1) the waits were too long for the bathrooms; (2) the start line was chaotic with various paces running over each other; (3) there were shortages of finish-line bonuses. I had hoped for a unified 2:40ish pace group, and there just was not. Further, the course is definitely rolling hills and not flat at all, albeit with a slight net elevation loss. Yes, some people get their OTQs/BQs at CIM, but I would place other courses as faster (Houston is one example). My sense is that the race has many fast runners and not such a fast course. The quality of competitors there was impressively high. My recommendation: go out conservatively and shoot for negative splits!
4.0

By: David R.

Posted: December 04, 2023

Don't Run If You Can't Finish in 5 hours 30 mins

No medal is guaranteed and it is CIM's policy. Think before committing to this race. CIM should have this policy prominently displayed in bold red letters on their web page and not in small print. CIM will take your 150 and disregard your expectations and your personal story. Honestly CIM advertising in this way is disgraceful. This race is really for elites and aspiring elites who want to BQ and not for average runners like myself who may not qualify per a policy. There were many average runners who participated and I saw how disappointed they were when CIM had no more medals. So beware after running and crossing the finish line that a medal is not given to you! If you were aware and properly informed, would you run a pricy race event if there were no medals at the end - I wouldn't? This is my first and last race with CIM. Having a medal means something to each individual - hard work, dedication, and a personal story who is not an elite or aspiring elite. CIM is not the race for everyone.
4.0

By: Nancy S.

Posted: December 11, 2022

Harder Than It Looks But Still Fast

My title alludes to the many uphill grades there are in this course, even though it is 'net downhill'. Last uphill was at 20.5 miles MOL, so train for hills, although none were steep (some were longish). I think the reason it's fast is because there are VERY few turns and long straightaways - excellent. Plenty of spectators, excellent organization. Water stations plentiful but be aware the sportsdrink is Nuun- be sure you work your nutrition around that. I was very glad I did. Expo was a bit weak, but I have found that to be the case everywhere since the pandemic. We traveled cross country for this so went north to the coast & redwoods afterwards; that was a good choice as Yosemite also is.
5.0

By: David H.

Posted: December 07, 2021

OK, but more demanding than advertised

The course is advertised as a great BQ venue. And while the course has a net downhill, it consists of gentle undulating hills that will not be kind to you if you don't train for them a bit. I neglected hills in training for my second go-round this year and suffered for it; my mistake, I knew better. And maybe it's a COVID casualty, but the Expo and swag were far smaller and poorer than 2017 where I came away with lots of nifty kit that I regularly use; no comparison to the shirt and inexpensive water bottle for 2021. I'd brought along a first-time marathon runner and prepped them to expect lots of swag so I was very disappointed. It's a well-run race and it's nice to run with 1000's of other runners with plenty of pacers for those with a goal. That said, I probably wont be back since there are other local options that wont cost as much time and money. My advice to the SRA is to not rest on your reputation but work to make this a special destination race.
4.0

By: John O.

Posted: December 07, 2021

Great to be back

Almost perfect conditions for the race and the organization was superb as usual in bussing runners to the start etc. The self-seeding into groups at the start works well as it seemed to me that just about everyone was honest about pacing. I can't imagine that this method would work in any big city marathon. Crowds are sparse compared to New York or Boston but they are very friendly, supportive and clearly proud of the hometown race. It reminds me of small town 10k races from 40 years ago. Take heed of the many warnings about the rolling hills for the first 15-17miles as the total elevation gain is about 700 feet (drop about 1000 feet). The only recommendation that I would have is to make sure that the aid stations are on both sides of the street. It seemed that after about 8-10miles, they were only on the right side and there was congestion and crossing over from the left side, resulting in some jostling and tripping.
5.0

By: do r.

Posted: December 11, 2019

worst bag gear retrival ever

I hope the organizers would get their act together next year. It was a free for all to get gear bags that were checked in. One runner fainted! Imagine running 26 miles and you start bending over to find your bag amongst the thousands of bags and runners! It was so easy to steal athletes bags, NOBODY was looking. I'm sure someone has lost a phone or car keys.
2.0

By: Kai R.

Posted: December 10, 2019

Objective review from back of the pack runner

CIM is a very popular marathon and I believe the main reason is that the course & time of year are ideal for those attempting to qualify for the Boston Marathon. In full disclosure I am a back of the pack marathoner. Here are my observations on the 2019 race: Expo - due to construction at the convention center, the expo was relocated to an old arena that was 10-15 min north of downtown Sacramento. For the size of the race, I was surprised at how small the expo was. Course - the course isn't very scenic - you go through farm and residential areas for the most part. Finish at the state capital is nice though. Course nutrition - plenty of aid stations. I'm not a big fan of Nuun products, so I brought my own electrolyte drink. No qualms about the Cliff gels, however I was disappointed they had mini Cliff bars vs. Bloks - Bloks would have been a better option I believe for runners. Some aid stations had oranges & bananas too. Would I run this course again? Only if I was trying to qualify for Boston.
3.0

By: Metro B.

Posted: November 30, 2018

Mediocre

Hugely disappointed by the 2018 race packet, which completely got rid of a goodie bag except for runners who paid for the $290 'VIP experience.' The standard $150 race entry gets you a t-shirt and a clear plastic gear check bag. This an extraordinarily cheap move for a race that has done little else to separate itself from other large marathons. The course runs through hillier-than-advertised streets, mostly through the uninspiring suburbs of sacramento. The finish in front of the capitol is cool, and the crowd support is above average.
2.0

By: Kaydee G.

Posted: December 12, 2017

Great race and fantastic course!

I came to CIM looking to PR and BQ. I chose CIM because of the time of year, being in December I wanted to have better chances of cooler weather. I have ran too many October marathons that have had heat waves on marathon day, and it was miserable! I also chose CIM, because I had heard it was a very fast course with net downhill. Although this is true, it really is not as fast as you would think. I live and train in Colorado and my training consisted of lots of hills and mountain runs. This course has rolling hills for the first 20 miles. Although they are not insanely steep hills, they are enough to really take a toll on you for 20 miles. I had heard people say the hills lasted until mile 16. WRONG. They continue until about mile 20 or so. The hardest part for me was not the hills, I paced smart on all of those, slowing about 10-15 seconds on each uphill, knowing I would make it up on the downhills. I ran a smart race and paced it great! The part of the course that was my demise was the part AFTER the 20 miles of hills. The pancake flat part, or the last 10K. That is usually the part in the race that I kick it in and start racing. I maintained my pace until the last 5K and then my quads could no longer take the flat. It was rough. When I looked at my Strava account you can literally see the change in my pace right where the course flattens out. I would definitely run this race again. It is very well organized and the aid stations were great. But, now I know what to expect with the hills and then knowing the last 10K is flat. I did plenty of uphill and downhill training, but I think for next time I will do long, hilly training runs and seek out some flat areas to end the run on with pick ups. Overall, great race and course, but be prepared for hills for 20 miles. They never seemed to stop. I PRed by 9 minutes and BQed right on the dot 3:35:00. Won't get in with the time, but I was on track to run a 3:32:00 the entire race until that last 5K... dang that flat part!!
5.0

By: Wes W.

Posted: December 08, 2017

Fast Course and Pleasent Event

Sacramento is a small city in California. It is the state capital. The city is surrounded by agriculture environment. The weather and the air quality in early December in Sacramento area is perfect for running. For 2017, the temperature started at 45 degree F and it was 55 degree F when I reached the finish line. The course is along wide streets with rolling hills. The overall course has more down hills than up hills. All hills are with gentle slops. The size of the event fits the course well. You can find your pace almost from the very beginning. However, there was no organized "waves" at the start line. I encounter many slow runners blocking my way for the first 3 miles. The event was well organized overall. Everything from expo, morning buses, starting area, bag checking, to aid stations, and finish area are all well arranged. The organizers have arranged at least one hundreds potties at the start area. Unlike most of other running events you have to spend significant of your preparation time in starting area awaiting for your turn to use a toilet. The lines for CIM were quite short, say, less than 5 minutes in average. There are potties in many water stations as well. The organizers have managed to get many sponsors to support the event. These benefit the runners directly. Something everyone received are: - Clif shots in a number of water stations; - Electrolyte drink nuun in every water station; - Whole food sandwiches at the finish area; - Sierra Nevada Beer at the finish area (this may not for everyone); - and many small gifts in the goodie bag. The rolling hill course plus the pleasant weather enables runners to run faster. The organizers made running this event a very pleasant experience. I have run 35 marathon in 35 different course. This event awarded me a medal with "35" as the main face of the medal. I thank the event for making this medal so special for me, although I know later that it is CIM's 35th anniversary.
5.0

By: Daniel J.

Posted: December 06, 2017

The Goldilocks marathon

This is really the ideal marathon. Not too large; navigating the expo, parking, getting to the buses, was all good because it isn't too large a race. Not too small, so they have a good expo, well supported with volunteers along the entire course, you're always among other runners, the finish line area had good food/beer and reasons to hang for awhile. As for the course, it's what I would conjure in a dream; not pancake flat (I need some hills to break up the monotony), but flat when you need it (the last 6-8 miles), very few turns. This year's weather was my fantasy...cool, but not too cold, damp (it lightly rained during the night), but no rain during the race. The sun came out and is at your back for the entire course (no glaring sun in your eyes). This is really the perfect course at the perfect time of year; I can see why it hasn't been changed in 35 years. Big Kudos to the race organizers; this is a perfectly executed race. My one complaint would be the water/nuun stations weren't big enough...when I was running with a pacing group, there were too many of us clustered together to easily reach water and/or nuun...I ditched the pace group and problem solved. Despite getting older (now in my 50's) and slower and not being in the best shape of my life, I set a PR and BQ'd by 10 minutes.
5.0

By: John O.

Posted: December 06, 2017

Wonderful organization and race

Second time runner in this race and my 35th marathon. Great organization and worth a trip to run CIM. Your quads will be trashed after 10 miles unless you train on downhills. Only suggestion for improvement is more porta-potties needed in first 20 miles. Waiting for a few minutes for a toilet break will damage your chances of a BQ. Everything else is geared to BQ and I don't understand why this lack of toilets is overlooked. I went into the bushes twice - helps to be a male in these circumstances.
4.0

By: Kimberly R.

Posted: December 05, 2017

Great overall race, with excellent organization!

A truly great experience for my second full marathon! Would definitely run this one again and recommend it to anyone wanting a well-organized and fun race! PROs: Race morning - the bus to the start in Folsom made everything a breeze (though they leave early, 5 a.m., this also allows you to be there and have time to chill, on the bus or outside, before the start). Port-a-pottys a plenty - I was so happy to see the number of toilets, allowing for a smooth start. Bag drop - super well organized and efficient!! Thank you, volunteers! Aid stations - well-stocked and frequent (every 1-2 miles), with nuun first, then water, some with food, and 4 spots for cliff gels. I'd still love to have Gatorade instead of nuun, so I just went for the water and used my own electrolyte fuel. Course - the course definitely has some rolling hills (I felt the downhills on my knees), but nothing too tough, and I kind of loved that you got the hills done after about mi 15, and then it was mostly a slight-downhill coast to the finish in downtown Sacramento. I thought the course was great in that I didn't feel overly crowded for it being the biggest race I've run - wide streets allowed for people to spread out. I also enjoyed the variety of running through neighborhoods and small towns. There were more spectators than I expected, so that was a pleasant surprise, but not the best aspect of the race. I was able to cut 12:30 off my time in this race, so the hills couldn't have been that bad! Shirt and swag - I really love the shirt, especially that the women's is actually long enough! Also enjoyed the belt, socks, and head/neck band, all stuff I'll actualy use! Weather - absolutely perfect. It rained overnight, so was not as cold as forecasted, but crystal clear morning, temps from 45-55 from start to finish. CONS: Finish line - this is my only area of constructive feedback for the race organizers. I would have loved to find Gatorade and/or chocolate milk right after the finish (with the water) in order to avoid the electrolyte/carb crash that ensued. It was difficult to locate the tent with nuun (hidden in a far corner). Also would have loved to see water refilling stations, especially with the obvious effort to promote recycling/composting (which I loved). The warm breakfast sandwich was good (thank you for having a vegetarian option!), but I would have also liked more simple-carb options, like orange slices and the chocolate milk. The high-quality coffee drinks to go made up for all of that, though. Overall the finish area felt a bit crowded and not as well organized / signed as the rest of the event. I loved finishing at the Capitol, though, and having the palm trees with the Christmas tree in the background of photos! Thanks for a great race experience, CIM!! I hope to be back!
5.0

By: Wayne Wright

Posted: February 17, 2017

California's Gold

INTRODUCTION: I am a race-walker with a median marathon completion time of 5:17:40. The California International Marathon was my forty-second 26.2-miler accomplished. COURSE: It was a perfect day for a marathon: temperature at the Folsom start line was 37 degrees, 98 percent relative humidity, 3 mph winds from the north-northeast with few clouds. The course was characterized by rolling hills from the start (without corrals, one gauged one's place based on where the pace leaders stood) until reaching downtown Sacramento just past mile 22 where it became pancake flat. While the net descent was 340 feet (about 13 feet per mile), there were not any significant ups or downs to speak of. In the first six miles, we traversed through Folsom, Orangevale, and Citrus Heights, mostly westbound on Oak Avenue, before turning south onto Fair Oaks Boulevard. Approximately 16 miles of the course was on the irregularly shaped Fair Oaks Boulevard, where we traveled south and west on the same street at least three separate times, and then west-southwest between miles 16 and 22. The final stretch was through downtown Sacramento, where, travelling mostly westbound on J Street and then L Street, we counted down each block starting at 57th Street. At 15th Street, we ran alongside the Capitol Park and at 11th Street, the State Capitol. We turned left on 8th Street, eventually reversing course on K Street, to reach, unique among marathons, our gender-segregated finish lines facing the front of the State Capitol and its resplendent Christmas tree. Finish time temperature was a partly cloudy 55 degrees, 59 percent relative humidity, and 6 mph winds from the west-northwest. ORGANIZATION: Well done. From the expo to the course support to the finish line, the race was pulled off almost flawlessly. Especially worth noting were the two 5:23 pace leaders. Well organized and full of good humor, the leaders identified what was available at each of the upcoming aid stations and noting their locations well in advance. SPECTATORS: Typical in number for a marathon of this size, enthusiastic in support. CONCLUSION: This race was deservedly well known as a place to qualify for the Boston Marathon, and upon looking at its program that was distributed at the expo, it was clear the organizers catered to this elite group of runners. That said, this was not done at the expense of the slower runners, who were also well treated during the entire length of the course. One should consider this race to be included in one's marathon portfolio. Well done, Folsom, Sacramento, and places in between.
4.0

By: Joe C.

Posted: December 09, 2016

Fast Course, Great Weather, Got my BQ!

This was my third marathon and I came to Sacramento because I heard how great this race was. It did not disappoint. The convention is well laid out and in a great location in downtown Sac. I stayed at a hotel where the bus picked me up right outside bright and early at 5am. This was greatly organized and they allowed us to stay on the bus until the race start. Although it isn't ideal to hang out on a bus for an hour before your race, with the logistics of the start location, it is the best you can expect. There is no problem finding a portapotty before hand because they are numerous. The course starts with a downhill so its hard not to start too fast. You are then greeted for the next 15 miles or so with gentle rolling hills with the downhills twice as long as the uphills. For those complaining about the hills, where do you live?! Although it is not completely flat, as long as you incorporate some hills in your long run, you should have no problem. I honestly barely noticed the uphills. The crowd support is not great but the fact that you are running with 9000 other marathoners makes up for any of that. It really feels like you are all in this together. I was able to PR by 15 minutes and get a BQ! The post race area isn't the greatest I've been to but its really cool to get to ring the BQ bell. Plus there is a beer area where you can recover and drink all the well deserved free beer you want. I'm from Oklahoma and I think I will be back next year to try and run under 3 hours. This is the race to do it!
4.0

By: Becca Fite

Posted: December 06, 2016

My 1st BQ! You must be researched and trained.

I travelled out of state for my third BQ attempt, and it was a success! HOTEL: We stayed at the Embassy Suites RiverFront; it was less than a half a mile walk to the busses on race day morning. The hotel is also exactly a mile from the finish line and expo. Since we had glorious weather all weekend, we walked to our hotel after the expo and the marathon. EXPO: large, fun, similar to most expos, no problem navigating RACE MORNING: no complaints here. Be prepared to be on the bus for 45 minutes. Bring your food and blanket. Once you arrive you are free to visit the 300 portopotties and come back to the bus to wait until 15 minutes before start time. RACE COURSE: no complaints here. Obviously people come here to PR, but you have to earn it. You must train on hills prior to coming here. The course is a net down hill, but the course is rolling (which I think it a good thing). Enjoyed the rural beauty along the course. Enjoyed running through the little downtowns. Although there are few turns on the course, I was still cognizant of running the tangents and finished with overall 26.21 miles! There was nice crowd support. You are not in Chicago or New York don't come here expecting that kind of support. FINISH: Bag check was fully stocked with volunteers to grab your bag quickly. Nice beer garden. Warm oatmeal provided by Whole Foods. GREAT location right in front of the capital with giant Christmas tree in front. SO MUCH FUN to celebrate my BQ by ringing the BQ bell! OVERALL: I lucked out by having the best weather ever this weekend- 40 degrees, sunny, no wind. As long as you understand the course and train appropriately, you have a GREAT chance of being one of those 23% Boston qualifiers the race is known for!
5.0

By: Brenk J.

Posted: December 05, 2016

Very Well-Organized, Not Particularly Fast, Course

This race is promoted as being a 'net downhill' course that is very fast. While I'm sure the finish line is at a lower elevation than the start, the course is actually full of rolling hills of varying sizes. I wouldn't call it a particularly difficult course, but it's not as easy and fast as the website implies. Most of the course is on a small state highway that is not very picturesque, with little to no crowd support until you get into downtown Sacramento for the last mile or two. On the other hand, the race organization is absolutely top notch. The buses to the start line and all the logistics at the start worked extremely well. It's great that they let you hang out on the buses until the start, since it's pretty chilly until the sun comes up. There were lots of aid stations and they were run really well. They have plenty of pacers and mine did a great job. I would say if you're looking for a really well-organized race, on a neutral-to-slightly-fast course, this is a good choice. If you're looking for beautiful scenery or great crowd support, look elsewhere.
4.0

By: Joyce L.

Posted: December 10, 2015

Made for running fast

We stayed in a hotel near-ish to the Convention Center where the expo was and there was some stress early on about the check-out time but on the day they put up a sign saying marathoners could check out at noon without extra charge, and $35 if you stay past 12.30, and I think a full day's charge from 2pm. The buses leave EARLY on race day, and they are plentiful. It does however mean you're left to chill for over an hour in the dark in Folsom - you can stay on the bus though. The start line area had the most number of portapotties I've ever seen in my life which was wonderful. The course is rolling at times, but everyone is there to run fast. There's really good spectator support which surprised me and just goes to show that the SF Marathon is the odd one out in NorCal for having the least atmosphere. It's not the prettiest course out there, but again - you're there to run fast. The finish line is a bit of a pain because you run past the recovery area before turning a few corners to separated men's and women's chutes.
4.0

By: Kristin D.

Posted: April 23, 2015

My Hometown Marathon

To say this course is entirely downhill is false. A more accurate description would be, an easy rolling hill course from a higher elevation to a lower elevation. Practice on hills for this race - it will do you good. Support and organization are both fantastic. No complaints there. Massage tent does have an extremely long wait so I wouldn't even bother. I grew up in the Sacramento area so the course wasn't anything I haven't seen before (obviously). I would say it's just 'pleasant', nothing more or less. Weather varies every year. No way of telling you what it's going to be like. It could be freezing, pleasant, or stormy. Completely unpredictable. Nice medal and great swag gifts. Ends downtown with lots of places to go and celebrate afterwards.
4.0

By: Guillaume C.

Posted: December 31, 2014

it's fast if you like rolling hills

I ran the race in 2014 and found it very well organized. Only minor issues is that we waited the bus for a while at the convention center, and there were no volunteers to tell us that it was normal, and some of the pacers went out way too fast - for instance I finished in 3:02 and found it difficult to get away from the 3:05 pace group in the first two miles. My main personal issue with this race is the course itself. It is a fast course if you like rolling hills, but it is not my case and I would rather have a pancake flat course. Don't get me wrong, the hills aren't that bad, but the constant ups and downs until ~M16 made it difficult for me to dial in marathon pace, as you constantly have to change your pace to match the effort on uphills and downhills. Also the fast reputation of this race is due to the fact that the field is insanely fast - many people come here to BQ or try and run a personal best, as opposed to RnR races for instance. In conclusion it's unlikely that I will run it again just because I did not like the topography of the course.
4.0

By: Mike Tsai

Posted: December 18, 2014

Excellent Fast Course- Perfect Weather!

This is my second Marathon and I really enjoyed the experience. Perfect weather this around. The organization was great especially the coordination with the hotels/transportation to the start line. The Pacers were really helpful in helping you see how well you were running. Plenty of water and GU throughout the course. Qualified for Boston so it definitely is fast. I do agree that the finish area could use some help in getting food to the runners. Most of us runners can't function as well once we finish the race so it would have been better to have the food a bit closer to the finish line.
5.0

By: Daniel J.

Posted: December 15, 2014

Fast and well supported race

This was my second attempt for a BQ and was somewhat supprized by the small holling hills for the first 13 miles or so. The organizationa and support was fantastic for every aspect of the race. I was disapointed in my performance expecially the last two miles but it had nothing to do with the race itself. I only rated it a 4 because I enjoy rural courses more than city running. Also I lost the 3:35 pace group almost immediately from the start. Many slower runners at the front of the race caused stop and go running for the first part of the race. Time corrals would be benificial for this speedy event. Congratulations to all the runners and thanks to everyone involved in this race.
5.0

By: Mike H.

Posted: December 12, 2014

Lots of fun

This was my first marathon, or race for that matter. I enjoyed it so much I registered for it next year. I agree with the previous comment regarding the sports drink and food at the finish. The drink was unpleasant. What is wrong with PowerAid or Gatoraide? I wasn't able to find the food at the end. I remember looking at a map, but after the race my brain wasn't functioning at 100%. Put up some signs or have some volunteers reminding runners where the food is. The spectators are great and most volunteers were cheering on the runners which was a pleasant surprise.
5.0

By: Lewis L.

Posted: December 10, 2014

OK but not up to the hype

The race is very well organized and supported - lots of porta potties, aid stations, etc. but i found the course rather bleak - most of it on four lane road past strip malls. not scenic at all.
4.0

By: Velva H.

Posted: December 08, 2014

You could be better and you have been better. B-

Race organizers went cheap with shirts, cotton blend rather the technical shirts of other races(compare to San Francisco and your own shirts of previous four years) the busses were good though there should have been a person on the ground at location A directing runners to bus lines, the virtual goodie bag was a virtual waste of space, all the runners I know love real goody bags with little samples of things like deodorant, glide, bars, and so on. The medals were readily available at end yet location of water was a mystery and the food was either gone or in secret location(i was told by those who found the soup and naan that it was inedible) and isn't this the race that gave ice cold cokes at the finish linewhere were those?. . Fabulous job done by the police in runner safety and course security. The drink on the course was downright nasty and even the water at stations tasted like from a treatment plant. There was an excellent quantity of gu on course. These comments are for myself and a number of my 2014 running companions, finishing from uner four hours to six hours.
4.0

By: Rob R.

Posted: December 08, 2014

Solid Race

Great course with up and down first half and flat secnd half. There are some hills here but it is fast. A smattering of crowds usually near each town along the course. Very easy race in terms of logistics and well run.
4.0

By: cindy egger

Posted: January 30, 2014

I have run the CIM 21 times in a row, it's great

I have enjoyed running CIM the past 21 years, I have run it 21 times in a row. Each time has been a different experience for me, each one is memorable. Love CIM, plan on running it til I can't anymore. It is great to have such a wonderful marathon so close to home. Can't say enough good things about it. Thanks for CIM, it brings a lot of good people together. Cindy Egger from little town of Galt,CA.
5.0

By: Jesse M.

Posted: January 15, 2014

Best Organized Marathon Ever...

...except for the starting line. There were no corrals so we were guessing where to start. Organization: But from the buses that met us downtown, to the quarter mile of port-a-Johns, to the ample well-marked, well-planned water stops to the cheer zones to the miles being right on. I had zero problems organizationally. (Outside of Michelob Ultra being the race beer; of course, that got many of us off the capital grounds quickly). Course: This was a great course! It's not nearly as 'easy' as some people said. But it was open and ran through plenty of communities that came out in force. The last stretch heading into Sacramento was awesome as the crowds got bigger and bigger heading to the capital. The only thing I would have changed would be to start it so that you can run more than a 100 yds toward the capital, a good quarter mile would have been great. Spectators: Nothing bad here either. Great in town and around the subdivisions. Between subdivisions it could be sparse. Of course, it was also freezing for California. Special kudos to the guy out in his bathrobe with a coffee directing us around the black ice in front of his house. It's 3000 miles away, but I would do this one again in a heart beat. Thank you CIM and SRA for the best marathon experience.
5.0

By: Chris Park

Posted: January 14, 2014

Cold

Being SoCal natives, my wife and I were not prepared for how cold this race was going to be. It was 27 F when we started and 30 F when we finished. Everything else was more than what we expected - course was great (no loops), spectors were very encouraging and genuine. Finish at the State Capitol was also great. We liked everything else about this race but because of the cold, I don't think we're going back.
5.0

By: Chris T.

Posted: December 27, 2013

Expected more after 31 years of an Intl Marathon

CIM is a modestly sized race with a lot of potential but fell short on many facets. The information prior the race was good and I felt somewhat prepared going in. The expo was a disappointment per the disorganization. I was sent to another line to pick up my bib, only to be called back later that I was in the right place originally. Then the line to verify your chip was active (not done by the marathon) wrapped around the expo floor and out the door and did not move very quickly. The expo volunteers were plentiful and generally uninformed. You need to remember where you signed up to catch the shuttle (when you registered for the race) because there is no way to find out that information at the expo. Once I got over to get my shirt, the blank stare of the teenager unaware of my presence just made the process worse. I was so frustrated with the Expo that I left without browsing any vendors. Printed materials were an advertisement for the Sacramento community with little to no useful information about the race itself. The shuttles out to the starting line were school buses. The heat did not work well on our bus. A 45 minute bus ride before running a marathon did not help the legs much. At least there were numerous portapotties in the start area. Bag drop was in a series of trucks by bib number (marked with small signs on only one side of the truck). The start was unceremonious. I turned back to help a guy restart his new 610 and turned around to find the race starting. Within a minute of the start, not all of the pace group leaders were in the corrals. The course was pleasant and rolling, not what you would expect based on the elevation chart. Water stops did not start until later than normal (after the 3rd mile). The stops were placed in the narrow spots of the course; there was a single table for ade and a single table for water, separated by only about 50 feet. Water stops were chaos and dangerous for stepping on the people who stopped to grab/drink their water. Pace group leaders were difficult to find. Many were not in the corrals until just before the race, if then. They hid their signs in front of them until we passed spectators, then the signs came out. It made rejoining the group after the bedlam of water stops a considerable challenge. The finish area was not well-designed. The food was off to the left, bag drop claim to the far right. Food and drink options were limited and uncharacteristic of a marathon. At least the shirt was nice.
3.0

By: Lulu Y.

Posted: December 13, 2013

Rolling Hills

I liked this course a lot because of the rolling hills. Granted it's not as fast as flat courses, but the rollers make it interesting. Compared to another downhill race (Tucson - trashed my quads), this one is much gentler on the quads. So make sure to do hill training. Organization is top notch. Probably even better than NYC, but then again NYC has a field that's 6 times as large - logistics can be tricky when it's that big. You get bussed up to Folsom at 5AM from your hotel in Sacramento, and you get to stay on the warm bus until quarter to race time. Porta-potties are plentiful at the start. One of the best parts of the race was the start. Instead of corrals, they have large and clear signs indicating pace team times so you know exactly where you need to be to find your pacer. I stuck with the 3:45 pacer like glue, not knowing that he was running faster than he was supposed to. For those of us who were able to hang on, we ended up finishing with a good 4-5 minutes ahead of schedule, which puts all of us at an advantage when it comes to registering for Boston. Speaking of Boston, the atmosphere of this race is intense. Because it's a good qualifier it attracts people looking for fast BQ times. All you hear around you is 'BQ, BQ' - gets a little nerve-wracking especially for this newbie trying to qualify. This is no RnR race with the party atmosphere and the pink tutus. If it weren't for the fact that there are so many other races I want to run, I would definitely run this again.
5.0

By: Mark A.

Posted: December 12, 2013

It Really is Fast!

After last year's freakish weather, I HAD to give CIM another try. After missing my BQ by 1:31 last year, I was able to go BQ+15 this year. The weather was a little cool at the start, but to me it was perfect. I've read in other posts that they should have salted the road at the water stations, but to give the volunteers credit, at every icy water station, there was a volunteer up ahead signaling runners of the icy conditions and to take it slow or move to the left. I found the rolling hills to be perfect and kept my quads entertained, but not abused like some of the straight down hill marathons I've done. This race in my opinion is professionally run by elite runners. I can't say enough good things about my Pace Leader Jen Pfeifer. Her splits were dead on and allowed me to start accelerating towards the finish at mile 16. I highly recommend this race to anyone that wants to BQ. As far as the spectators go, I gave them 5 stars because for when the course went through a town, it seemed like it was always filled with cheering fans. In the beginning stages of the race, it does go through some smaller, rural communities, but groups of enthusiastic fans were still present. This isn't Chicago, Boston or New York, so don't expect fans 3 deep along all 26.2 miles.
5.0

By: Paul M.

Posted: December 10, 2013

Fast course, not super scenic

I did this marathon with hopes of qualifying for Boston, which I did! If you're trying to qualify for Boston, this is a good one to do. It had more hills than I expected, but I trained on hills, so no big deal. The pace groups were really good with several at 5 minute intervals. My only really negative comment is that at the finish line, there was no food provided of any kind- all they gave me was a water and a can of coke. Really?? The other marathons I did gave at least a banana, a bar, and a chocolate milk or something. Aside from that, it was good enough. When I did it the weather was freezing! (25 degrees or something) If I weren't trying to qualify, I don't know if I would come in from out of town for it- there are so many other beautiful courses out there.
4.0

By: John G.

Posted: December 10, 2013

Great marathon

This is one of the best organized marathons that I have run (of 15 total). The pros: 1. Buses pick you up right at your hotel...no need to stand around in the cold waiting for the bus. 2. You are allowed to remain on the bus at the starting line until about 10 minutes prior to the race start. 3. More portable toilets at the start than you could possibly need. I used the toilets 3 times at the start and the longest line was 3 people. 4. The expo is efficient and not congested. 5. The mile markers are accurate 6. Plenty of water stations and toilets along the route 7. Nice wide streets and little congestion on the course 8. Rolling hills in the first half keep you from overusing any one muscle group in your legs. The course flattens out in the last half were you need it the most The cons: 1. It can be cold or wet. 2013 was dry but 27 degF at the start...which was actually not so bad if you dress appropriate for your pace. 2. No corrals at the start, but people line up based on projected finishing time (there are signs to indicate the correct position at the side of the start).
4.0

By: Jesse S.

Posted: December 08, 2013

Too many hills to be fast.

This course is not as advertised. It's called the 'fastest course in the west' but that's only if you think gravity is always good. If you look at the course profile it appears there is one major hill. The truth is there is one short flat section and otherwise it rolls the entire time. Think the first 5 miles just after Hopkinton. You're either going up or downhill and by mile 12 your quads are toast. My recommendation on this is to train for it as you would for Boston or don't run it at all. The eccentric loading on your quads is ridiculous. The next problem is that there were very few spectators and the water stops were ICEY. Nobody brought salt to thaw the water that had spilled. I almost went down. One drink table had nobody staffing it and all the tables served Dixie cup size drinks. Clearly an attempt at cost cutting. Finally Sacramento is a boring flat city. It's more like Flint, Michigan than California. Except for the palm trees I would have thought I was in any other rust belt town. Not a destination race and too hilly to be fast if you've training for flat and fast. Don't believe the hype.
2.0

By: Alex Giffords

Posted: December 15, 2012

Great marathon with some work to do

I flew in from Mexico City and was a little disappointed for the weather, but there is nothing you can do about it. The course has some hills that I was not aware of, but hills are part of any marathon. The people along the course were great and I can't say enough 'thank you' to the volunteers. The thing that really blew my mind is that the timing mats are placed at the relay exchanges, at the oddest course points: according to someone I contacted by mail something like 5.9 miles, 7.6 miles, 7.4 miles and 5.6 miles. Isn't that weird? I mean, how can an alleged 'organized by runners'marathon do such a thing? Place the mats at 10K intervals -like most races- and do whatever you like for everyone else. Nevertheless this one I'm running again no matter what!!!
4.0

By: Tony U.

Posted: December 12, 2012

Great Marathon on a Very Bad DAy

The CIM Expo is located at just a block from the finish line, main bus shuttle to starting line, and host hotel, the Sheraton Grand (very good hotel prices that sell out fast)near the Capitol Bldg. I found the Expo to be very fun and not overly packed or disorganized like other Expos I've been to. The morning bus shuttle is quick, warm, and reliable. Arrived at the starting line an hour prior to the start and it was freezing cold, windy, and raining super hard. Everyone sought shelter at the gas station pumps and foodmart because the weather was absolutely horrible. When the race began, there was a head wind and unpredictable swirling rain along with fallen branches on the course itself, not to mention the maze of tossed clothes from the lead runners. Normally, the CIM is a fast PR course. Because the rain was so bad (it rained for the first 4 hours of the marathon very hard), the course was more about survival. As prepared as I was, I felt as if every mile was a struggle because of the rain, and running distractedly with a protective windbreaker cape. I also was not able to comfortably pace because the group never broke up. Usually, for the first mile or two, there's a queue of runners which slow down the pace. For the 2012 CIM, this queue last for about 10 miles. I cannot comment on the course for this first 10 miles because it was honestly a blur. I do recall many supportive volunteers giving their best to root us crazed lunatics on and that was much appreciated. My favorite part of the course, of what I recall was arriving in the town of Fair Oaks. There was something special about that part of the run. Other than that, the run was difficult because my shoes, shorts and running shirt were all drenched making me feel heavier. Downhills were not all that enjoyable because a downhill would end in a puddle which required careful navigation. All this said, I can tell that on a good running day, this would be a fun course to run. The support from the spectators was genuine and heart felt. The end of the marathon was well organized and posted times listed in real time. Look forward to running the CIM again next year.
5.0

By: Angela T.

Posted: December 11, 2012

Running in a monsoon

After I didn't qualify for Boston at Boston last April because of the 88 deg temperature, I needed to run another qualifying marathon and chose CIM. I was disheartened by the torrential rain, gusty cross and head wind and floods from the storm that was passing through, but I accomplished my goal of qualifying for Boston again. It was an experience like no other running in that extreme weather. Despite this, I really like the course. I knew there were going to be rollers the first 10 miles and I actually liked them. They provided a nice variation but still were gentle on the legs. The start line was somewhat chaotic with no corrals, which was surprising given the 6000+ runners. I hope the race organizers consider some sort of controlled and orderly starts in the future. I followed a pacer and noticed that he pushed through people right from the start. Some friends of mine got stuck way in the back and lost a considerable amount of time before they could pick up their pace. The pacer I followed was awesome. He called out the time at every mile and I felt assured that I would meet my goal time if I stayed with him, which I did. The water/Powerade stations were manageable. I was able to grab a cup at every station without slowing down much at all. At the finish line, I leaned on a very kind volunteer who stayed with me until I was able to stand on my own two feet. Overall, the race was well organized, the expo was above average, the T-shirt was colorful and appropriately sized. The medal was okay, though I'm not one to care about what it looks like as long as they give one. It was sweet to get the added bonus of gloves and neck gaiter to commemorate CIM's 30th anniversary. I'm grateful for the spectators that braved the storm to cheer us on. I would definitely like to run this marathon again, hopefully in the advertised typical clear, cool, sunny weather.
5.0

By: Ken S.

Posted: December 09, 2012

Pace group was a tremendous help on stormy day

I really enjoyed the course on a wild and windy day! My CIM pace group leader (Lee) was a real help in keeping the pace even under bad conditions, especially at the start, and keeping things calm while the winds howled! The volunteers who came out and worked in the wind and rain and the spectators who braved the elements were awesome! The expo, buses and start were all very well organized. It would be helpful if there were signs or banners before the water stops - I missed a few because I didn't see them coming up. Also, better signs at the finish directing runners to the food tent (I never saw it) and the baggage tent would be helpful. I didn't get the PR I has hoping for, but this is certainly a fast course and I'd love to come back in the future and try again.
4.0

By: gretchen liechty lynch

Posted: December 08, 2012

Loved this Marathon!

I was looking for a fast course that wouldn't be too hot, and the fact that my sister lives in San Fran made it a perfect destination marathon. We had horrendous weather  downpour, windy, and lots of puddles  but I was amazed at the crowd support. The volunteers were amazing, and there were people cheering us on the whole way. I highly recommend staying at the Lake Natoma Inn in Folsom. They had a free shuttle bus to the start and a warming tent shared with the other Folsom hotels (with private port-o-potties!) You will need a way to get back to the hotel though (26 miles north!) so if you don't have a fan club, staying in Sacramento might be a better option. Pros: -Cool Weather almost guaranteed -Fast course if you regularly train on rolling terrain. (If you train on flat terrain you will find it a bit challenging.) -PACING TEAMS!! I got to be paced by the legendary Tim Tweitmeyer! The pace teams are fantastic! -Great swag  choice of long or short sleeved tech shirt (I got both since my sister registered and didn't run), gloves, cinch bag, and winter running face cover/ hat/ scarfy type thing. -Amazing crowd support -Plenty of Powerade and Gu at Aid Stations -Easy expo Cons: -Although they count your chip time for BQ, everything else is gun time. I didn't cross the start for 2 minutes, but my finishers medal and my AG placement are by guntime. Why? -The start is too crowded. Not sure why, since it isn't a marathon wiht 40,000 people. I think there were about 8,000 runners at the start including the relay folks. The first mile I was 17 seconds slower than the second because I couldn't get through  couldn't even weave. Despite the rain, I PRed by 22 minutes. I would love to do this one when it isn't raining!
5.0

By: myriam l.

Posted: December 06, 2012

Fantastic volunteers in worst conditions

Well manned aid stations. Good marathon, nice course. No clocks at all on the course. I never found any food other than chocolate milk. Heard there were pancakes. Odd choices for a post race meal.
4.0

By: Joe B.

Posted: December 04, 2012

Wet But Fun!

I came from Cincinnati to run this race based upon what I read (and heard from a couple people who had run it). They do a good job of marketing this race as one of the fastest courses (if not the fastest in the US). I really don't think the elevation drop of 300 feet over 26 miles is that much of a benefit. I drove the course the day prior and I found that it is a rolling course for most the way, with up and down grades. I can't say there are any 'hills' on this course, just up and down grades. So you do get the benefit of the down grades and have to work a bit up grade but it evens out and keeps the course interesting. I heard the last 6 were 'flat as a pancake' but that's not really true. Maybe the last 2 miles are. But the course is fine, I just don't think there is much benefit to the elevation drop they mention in their marketing efforts. Pros: Gently rolling point to point course Fairly scenic Great organization Chocolate milk at finish Bus pickup at hotel on race morning Being able to stay on the buses prior to start Ample water stops (see Cons) Expo was a manageable size and easy to navigate Nice shirt Easily BQ'd Cons: Some water stops at beginning didn't seem to be fully manned by volunteers most likely due to the weather but who can blame them. Had to pay for a cab ride back from finish to hotel which is about $20. No time kept on the course (not sure if this was due to the weather). I would recommend this race. Its a good one. I won't likely run it again as I am from out of town and there are so many others I would like to do.
5.0

By: Daniel C.

Posted: December 03, 2012

great first marathon

I ran the marathon this year and although I was initially worried about the rain and wind, it turned out to not bad at all. Maybe a bit slow, but plenty of runners did good times. General comments: the course was more scenic than I expected, with nice variation to keep things interesting, finishing with the long run in East Sacramento and to the capital. Aid stations were plentiful and well organized. Spectators were fantastic. Volunteers were amazing. Start and finish were well organized. Results were rapid with excellent split times. The only downer for me was the finish food wasn't to my liking (Bisquick-like pancakes, bad bagels, and green bananas) but there's no shortage of nearby food so even with nothing at the finish it would have been 5-stars.
5.0

By: Tyler McCandless

Posted: September 27, 2012

Fastest course you can run!

I did this race in 2010 as my first marathon hoping to hit the Olympic Trials Qualifying mark of <2:19:00 and ended up running 2:17:22. I know it's been described as a net downhill course so therefore fast, but it's even faster than that because the uphills are generally shorter and steeper while the downhills are longer and lower grade. The first 20 miles you can really fly, but then you enter the city and it's perfectly flat. I highly recommend doing this course sometime - but be sure to prepare for the downhills! In terms of organization and spectators - both were great! A lot of aid stations and plenty of people cheering you on the whole way.
5.0

By: Carl L.

Posted: January 27, 2012

SO MUCH POTENTIAL

CIM is so close to being a big time race. To do this though they HAVE to sort out a few things, which can easily be done. 1. Get rid of Ultima - Not sure about all the scientific reasons, but bottom line it is AWFUL and I quickly stuck with water 2. Water stations were a mess, way too small for a marathon of this size 3. Finish area - confusing and poor. I never did find the food, though once i saw the pancakes I had no interest, c'mon give us something other than bananas and health stuff. Also took some time to find the bag drop area. 4. Charging to take the bus to the start, this should be part of the cost. (or at least hide it in the cost :)) On the plus size this race has so much going for it: 1. Great point to point course comparable to Grandma's (those who complain it's boring, remember it's 26 bloody miles!!) 2. Fans, I've run 19 marathons and their support and sheer number of spectators are just behind Boston and Chicago. Ive run several supposedly rock n roll bands and this race had more bands, music than any other I've run! 3. Plenty of water stations, now if only they make them bigger and offer another sports drink. 4. Great area, be sire to check out Old Town where the street is like how it was in the Wild West. We also spent extra nights in Sonoma and San Francisco. Overall a great trip and race, even though I pulled a muscle after 13 and basically limped in. Still very enjoyable and the main problems can easily be fixed.
5.0

By: Melisa C.

Posted: December 13, 2011

Relay: Second Two Legs 12.9 miles

I ran the full in 2007 and vowed to not run the full again until I can beat the 6 hour course limit. Thank goodness for the relay. I ran the second two legs. I live in Sacramento, I know the road well and included hills in my training. The shuttle service was top notch. To correct a previous review, there was a gear check a the relay stations. You left your bag on the bus and it was taken to the finish. The weather was perfect, the spectators enthusiastic, aid stations ample although I did not care for the Ultima drink yuk. It was so nice to run a race in my home city. I'm glad I stayed away from the horrors of Las Vegas. Hey guys, come to Sacramento!!! I plan to train extra hard to run the full in 2012: The 30th anniversary of the race. Folks remember this is NOT a downhill race. It is NET downhill. The first half of the race is lots of big rolling hills. From Manzanita and Fair Oaks to Sac State it's gentle rolling hills. From Sac State to the Capitol it is pancake flat. Please include hills in your training.
5.0

By: Bob G.

Posted: December 09, 2011

Feedback on the Marathon Relay

In 2009 I ran the marathon here, but this year I ran the middle two legs (14.5mi) of the relay. The relay organization was not as good as the marathon organization. We were told there would be bag checks at the relay stations, but there were not (we had to hand our bags off to the previous runner on the team). The bus shuttles were very convenient to each stop from downtown. We were one of the top teams, so I didnt have to wait very long after arriving at the exchange point. For slower teams, the wait (especially for the 4th runner) could be several hours. I didnt take the bus back downtown, so I dont know how long the wait was (I had been worried about that). It also felt very strange knowing I was going to finish at the 20.5 mile mark while everyone I was running with had to continue almost 6 more miles. I didn't enjoy that, and for that reason, I dont think I'd do the relay again.
4.0

By: Dave S.

Posted: December 09, 2011

An excellent marathon gets even better

If you like mid-size marathons like I do, I don't know where you can do better than the CIM. And I say this despite my having just missed a PR both times I've run it ('08 and '11). That means I could gripe about the hills or the temp or the Ultima or the fluid stations; but with all the great advice right on this website, there's no excuse for not being well prepared for everything you encounter. In other words, if you're steamed about your results, LOOK IN THE MIRROR. Here are a few facts: 1. I live in the Montana Rockies and know cold; CIM is not cold, in Folsom or anywhere else. Weather service said 28 F at the start his year and I can assure you if it was below 40 it was a matter of 1-2 degrees. 2. The hills for me are ideal, just enough up for regular breaks so the ham stress keeps you from overusing the quads. If you can't stand any hills, stick to track & field. 3. Ultima, Schmultima. It's a sports drink, the flavor is wretched ... what else is new? People who say it's low in carbs or whatever either a) haven't read the ingredients list or b) are world-class marathoners who should have their crew providing their own unique fluid. 4. Fluid station organization has been greatly improved. Water was first and Ultima second at every station. Sure, the kids at some stops get bright ideas like standing on both sides of the road, but management can't totally prevent that. 5. Finish line organization has also noticeably improved (between '08 and '11). Entry to the best food areas is way better controlled. Pancakes (made on the spot) are a great idea; so is chocolate milk. 6. Organization of the expo, busses, start line, etc. are by far the best of any marathon I've run. 7. Sacramento is a great location, not just for weather (ideal), but a city small enough to navigate easily but big enough for tons of hotels, restaurants (stay to celebrate with dinner at Ella), and flights in & out.
5.0

By: Kevin H.

Posted: December 09, 2011

Outstanding. Run this race!

Awesome race. I traveled from the Chicago area and it was well worth it. Good size expo but not too crowded. Easy to get in and out, but also plenty of stuff and good speakers. Convenient bus to the start that gets you there with plenty of time. TONS of porta-potties at the start...seriously I've never seen so many, it was terrific. Convenient bag check. Awesome pacers and plenty of room to run. The course is rolling in the first 17-18 miles, but if you are ready for that it is really fast...definitely the fastest course I've ever done. The rollers help to break up the monotony of the scenery as well (although it's quite nice at the start with the fall colors on country roads and very nice at the end once you get into Sacramento). Great pace teams. Awesome aid stations, with little bottled waters you could take with you if you needed. Well organized finish, with plenty of room to move around (and also pretty, right in front of the state capitol). Maybe my only gripe is that the spectator support was just OK, but that's not a huge deal for me. And to top it all off, the weather was absolutely perfect for running. CIM is a runner's race, they get just about everything right. Highly recommended.
5.0

By: Alice Y.

Posted: December 08, 2011

What a pleasure!

I just ran my PR BQ race on this course last weekend. It was my 12th marathon, and this has to be one of the best experiences. The course was tougher in the beginning than I had anticipated with rolling hills, but it made the last half of the race seem easier. But what was most impressive was the way in which the aid stations were spaced out. As I was getting hotter and more thirsty in the last half of the race, aid stations were spaced more closely. Just as I needed some water, there it was! The pace team was amazing and knew the course so well that she could call out hills, best line to take on turns, and when to push it. The crowd of supporters never petered out, and there was no time I felt like I was running alone. All around, excellent experience!
5.0

By: Anthony Villasana

Posted: December 08, 2011

Overall a very good race course.

This is a point to point race. A bus ride from the hotel was $20.00 but, I wonder how many people pay. Last, yr. it was $10.00. Plus, the drivers took the scenic route in the dark. The course itself had alot of rolling hills. But, after mile 22 it went fast and flat. No head winds on the course (it was very windy the day before). It wasn't too crowded at the hydration areas. Great crowd support from spectators. I think if your representing a popular group or have your name on it helps. You had to charge the hills to appreciate the little downhills on the course. Overall a great experience.
3.0

By: Choy Bacor

Posted: December 08, 2011

Everything A Marathon Should Be

Ran CIM for the first time this past Sunday and will now continue to run it every year I can. After hearing all of the horror stories about RnR Las Vegas and other marathons it's nice to have participated in a marathon that catered to every runner type (qualifiers and recreational runners). The expo was excellent with many types of clinics offered. Sacramento itself has changed a lot from when I was last there to become a vibrant city with a thriving downtown and midtown full of nice little restaurants, bars, shops, and galleries (check out Time Tested Books!). The bus line, while long, moved along quickly and efficiently. Don't bother with the bus number you're assigned to, you're herded to the next available bus. If you want to sit with your friends make sure you all line up together. I love how you're able to stay in the heated buses until 5 minutes before the start. Plenty of porta potties with minimal wait time. The course is lined with well stocked aid stations and enthusiastic volunteers. There is always someone on the course cheering you on. Each community throws a little town party to cheer on the runners. So you get these patches of 7 huge party like celebrations throughout the course that keeps you moving. Most knowledgeable and enthusiastic crowd support I've ever witnessed. Finish line area was very well managed and volunteers moved runners along efficiently. Pancake breakfast and other post race food (chocolate milk!) was very well done. Large area for reunions and to hang out. Gear bag check retrieval was very well done and efficient. Best marathon to date! You can tell runners organized this event!
5.0

By: mark s.

Posted: December 06, 2011

A good marathon, but...

I really like running this marathon, as it's usually very cold at the start and somewhat close-ish to my home, but there are a few things people should understand before deciding to run CIM: First, it ain't so easy. The race management heavily promotes it as a super fast Boston qualifier, and on their website, they've been using Bert Yassos' quote that it's 'A super fast -if not the fastest- marathon in the west' for years now. The course does have an altitude loss of 300+ feet, yet the first 17 miles are nothing but rolling hills, one after another after another. Not hard hills, but constant hills. Ya need to do your hill work. Second, they serve Altima as a marathon drink. As previously mentioned by another reviewer, it has no carbs, no sugar and the vitamins provided in the drink won't do anything for you until the following day or so. In short, if you're relying on it to give you ANYTHING that might be beneficial to your run you'll be sorely disappointed. Never mind that Altima is one of the races' biggest financial sponsor. In the end, we'd probably be better off if Koolaid took over the drink sponsorship, as at least it has some sugar in it. Anyway, I still like this race, and will continue to put it on my race calendar every few years or so.
4.0

By: stacy S.

Posted: December 06, 2011

Really fun, watch for the uphill

I ran the 2011 CIM this past weekend and thoroughly enjoyed it. I second the comments that the course isn't flat at all nor is it what you envision when they say 'fast downhill.' I was expecting many long downhill stretches with some intermittent ups and it was a lot of short uphill rollers with a couple of sort of steep downhills that make up most of the elevation loss. if you look very closely at the course elevation map you can get an idea of this. definitely find hills in your training and work 'em. the organization was top-notch. we started dead on time, which may be a first. the huge number of potties at the start was a blessing. for some reason i thought there were going to be potties at every mile, and there weren't but they were plentiful enough. spectators were everywhere and they were enthusiastic this year. many times there would be two or three kids standing together in a random spot cheering like crazy. felt good that they'd come out that early in the morning. loads of really enthusiastic folks in the last mile when you really need it. i got a big boost from them and finished stronger than i expected. a very animated, fun volunteer that was pointing me toward the women's finish chute as i rounded the final corner was wonderful. i finished with a big smile because of him/her. weather was flawless - perfect! i recommend this race and will do it again myself.
5.0

By: Lit O.

Posted: December 05, 2011

Highly recommended!

2011 was the first time I ran CIM. I've read the comments about the previous CIMs and I must say that the 2011 edition was simply so much better than what it was made out to be by several past participants. First of all, the course is not 'ugly' at all. In fact, it was a good mix of rolling highways, suburbs and urban areas. It wasn't mountains and the ocean but it wasn't bad either. Second, the crowds were very enthusiatic all throughout and came out to cheer even if it was very chilly for most of the day. Third, the rolling course is just perfect. Yes, it's a net downhill course and it felt like one, but there were enough small hills to keep you interested and focused. I can see why many runners PR and BQ here because the last 10k is really just flat and fast. I would love to run CIM again and I had to fly 14,000 miles to run it!
4.0

By: Aileen O.

Posted: December 05, 2011

Fantastic marathon for a PR or BQ

I ran this race to achieve a personal best and I achieved that, beating my last time by 3 minutes! I thought the course was perfect for running fast and the organization was superb for a race of this size. Here are my comments on each aspect of the race: Start Line organization: I stayed in the Lake Natoma Inn in Folsom so I wouldn't have to bother with the shuttles from Sacramento to the start in Folsom. There was a shuttle from our hotel but they wanted runners to board by 5:15am which seemed way too early for a race that didn't start until 7am and the start line was less than 2 miles away! I opted to jog up to the start not realizing the start was completely uphill and would have to board a shuttle bus to go the rest of the way. I was kind of cutting it close as the shuttle bus dropped us off 10 minutes to 7am and I really had to go to the bathroom. Luckily, there were plenty of portapotties at the start, which was a relief, so I had plenty of time to go to the bathroom and then line up according to my finish time. I think the brochure and race map needs to be clearer about the actual start of the race and that runners staying in Folsom will need to board a shuttle bus to get to the start. But why can't the shuttle bus pick runners up in Folsom at 6am instead? Course: The first mile was completely downhill and then from there we had a number of rolling hills, downhills, and flat to the finish after the bridge at mile 22. I thought the mix of gentle rolling hills was nice for the variation. I didn't care for the Ultima drink so I carried Gatorade on a fuel belt. I wish the race organizers would get rid of the horrible tasting Ultima drink, I don't know of any other marathon that uses it. I really enjoyed the mix of rural roads at the beginning and the tree-lined streets in downtown Sacramento. The rest was mostly strip malls and housing developments but that's what you find in Northern CA. I wasn't running for scenery anyway so it didn't matter to me, there were spectators on the course and people were friendly enough shouting encouragement to us but spectators are not a huge motivating factor for me either. Finish: I really liked finishing in front of the State Capital. I was hoping to get a massage afterwards but I didn't find the tent. I liked that there was a changing tent- that was a nice touch and something I haven't seen at other marathons. I think there was a bit of a line at the food area but I didn't take anything to eat as I'm not really hungry after finishing a marathon but I liked getting the chocolate milk, that held me over for a little while. Overall: I would recommend this marathon to anyone who is looking to qualify for Boston or achieve a PR. The point to point and rolling to downhill course is ideal for running fast. The weather was perfect for us this year, averaging in the 50s with a chilly start. Race organization was better than most marathons I've run-plenty of portapotties at the start, nice visible mile markers, and plenty of water stops
4.0

By: Bret Simmons

Posted: December 05, 2011

A great event

My first CIM and I'll consider coming back. Organization is very important to me, and this one is extremely well organized. The volunteers at the Expo, start, finish and along the course were first rate. Got my number and goody bag VERY fast at the Expo, which I appreciate. The bus system the day of the race was flawless. We got to the start in plenty of time and you could either wait in the bus or take advantage of one of the HUNDREDS of porta-potties. Bag check was quick and easy and the start was very simple. Great job. The conditions this year were near perfect. Cool and calm for most of the race but a little warm at the end. The course is rolling hills mostly at the start but since I train on hills they were more like speed bumps. Spectator support is sparse. I loved the Ultima at the aid stations. I also picked up GU twice at aid stations. I loved the course. The finish was very well organized. Got my chip off quickly and had my medal and two cartons of chocolate milk in my hands fast. Bag pick up was hard to find because it was behind the crowd of spectators, but it went very fast. Pancakes, bagels, fruit, cookies, and hot soup in the food area - better than I expected. The finisher shirt was excellent, but my only disappointment was since you get it at the Expo, it does not say 'finisher.' Well done, CIM. This event is a winner.
4.0

By: Julie G.

Posted: April 23, 2011

Great marathon... water stations need fixing

I loved the marathon. I like that the mile markers are clearly visible. The expo was done very well. Though the course is not nearly as flat as I thought, I still enjoyed the rolling hills and running toward the capitol. Thank you for providing enough porta-potties at the start! Please, please have water and electrolyte replacement drinks on both sides of the road where possible. Also, the tables should be longer, with water consistently provided first or sedond each time. Paper cups, too, please. The food line was too long after the race, so I left without eating. Thanks to all the great volunteers!
4.0

By: Sarah I.

Posted: January 26, 2011

Boring scenery and bored spectators

They hype up this marathon so much as being "net" downhill and I guess I didn't expect as many rolling hills as there were. If you are planning to run this, make sure you include hills in your long training runs. I found this to be a very ugly marathon. The only nice scenery along the way was a few minutes through Fair Oaks and then when you get past 20 mile mark or so (when the scenery doesn't really matter anyway!) Also, most of the spectators were at the relay change and were there to cheer on the relay runners. There were a fair number of people watching but very few were cheering. Most looked like they were asleep! I have done Big Sur and Napa before and wanted to try a bigger race with more spectators to cheer me on. I will stick with small, scenic races from now on. Also, the bus got us to the start line about an hour and a half before the race started. There would be more incentive to take a bus from Folsom if it left an hour later! Also, the water stations in the first four miles or so were all out of water and I started to panic that this was going to be the situation all the way through. Also, such a crowd at the end for food that I didn't even attempt it. Anyway, on the positive side... nice expo, although a bit crowded, tons of porta-potties at the start and beautiful weather (I am surprised that a guy from Texas complained that it was too hot and humid!). Glad I did it because I live in the area, but I would NOT do it again.
3.0

By: Abraham S.

Posted: January 04, 2011

some great things, some not-so-great

GREAT: 1) Very well-organized transportation to the start - no waiting in the cold for a bus; 2) There was a perfect ratio of port-a-potties to runners at the start - bravo! (I waited about three minutes as compare to the usual 10-20 minutes. How come other race organizers don't get this?); 3) Great size for a marathon - it has the combined benefits of both large races and small races. GOOD: 1) Neat combination of elites/sub-elites along with recreational runners (from around the country/world, not just regional); 2) Undulating course - not flat - which adds variety; 3) Large number of spectators (though not incredibly enthusiastic). BAD: 1) As in previous years, the aid stations were disorganized - still absolutely no consistency, as others have reported; 2) Rations of food at the finish were meager. ONE VERY BAD THING: Ultima is the WRONG choice for a "sports drink" in a marathon. It has no carbs (and very little sodium, which is a great electrolyte)! What it does have is useless - lots of added vitamins and minerals with no short-term benefit. Carbs are necessary (for most of us) in a 26-mile run. The race directors say that runners can carry their own gels/drinks, etc., but this is a cop-out, and the runners who mistakenly assume that this drink has some sugar or other worth are more likely to suffer in the later stages because of this. Ultima has absolutely NO place in a marathon.
4.0

By: Stacey J.

Posted: December 18, 2010

Tougher than you might think

I flew in from Illinois to try to qualify for Boston. This was my 6th marathon. I think this course is a bit more challenging than other runners would lead you to believe. I had read some negative comments regarding water stations so I was not surprised that they were inconsistent (water or Ultima first) and not always on the same side of the road. My biggest complaint about this race was the transportation. I had planned to drive to the start but parking is not an option. I paid the $10 to take the shuttle (I think this is steep plus they never check so I wonder how many people don't even bother to pay) and I was told that all parking was free downtown on race morning. I parked directly across from shuttle pickup and owed $20 to the garage when I returned. The expo was crowded and the volunteers seemed overwhelmed and even a bit rude. It's worth running if you live in the area but I wouldn't fly in for it. Spectators were good.
4.0

By: Eileen C.

Posted: December 15, 2010

Good Boston Qualifier

My first CIM, and seventh marathon. This was a wonderfully organized race with an abundance of porta-potties at the start! Most hills were gently rolling and a good variety for the legs. I followed a great pace group - the 4:30's - and the leaders were upbeat, kept us on pace, reminded us to relax when necessary and were very attentive to runners who were walking and looked like they needed assistance. I needed to finish under 4:30 to qualify as a 60-64-year-old female and our group leader correctly advised me to move up ahead to assure a qualifying finish. I will be forever grateful for this wise advice. The water stops were a bit crowded but seemed to have improved according to previous reviews. The crowds were especially helpful near the finish in spiriting us over the finish line. Of the seven marathons, this was by far the easiest on my body. And the weather... how did they arrange for the rain to stop and the sun to come out and the temperature to remain a runner's dream??? Thank you, CIM and Pace Team 4:30!
5.0

By: Chris S.

Posted: December 11, 2010

Fantastic!

The organization could not have been better. This is a wonderful course with a lot of variety. The starting and finishing areas had the convenience of a 200-person race despite the 7000+ marathoners. I would rank this as one of the three best marathons that I have done.
5.0

By: stig p.

Posted: December 10, 2010

Good job, Sacramento

Overall this was a nice marathon. Crowds were plentiful and very supportive. The weather could have been a little cooler and less humid but so be it. More rolling hills the first 13.1 than anticipated. Seems like the water stations need a little work. It was difficult to know where the water was (relative to the sports drink). The volunteers were shouting it out, which helped, but it would be better if the cups were different color, or there were flags or signs differentiating the drinks. For some reason it seemed to me the same drink (water or sports drink) was not always at the first tables; it was inconsistent. Starting line organization was very good. Excellent supply of porta-potties.
4.0

By: Hilda B.

Posted: December 10, 2010

Good Marathon!

A good marathon, with a fast course if you are looking for a PR. Lots of porta-potties at the start. Quick and convenient transportation from the drop-off area to the start. I have run this marathon three years in a row and my big complaint this year was the lack of cups after mile 18. I had my own water bottle so the volunteers would refill it with their water jars, but this is unacceptable for a marathon aid station. Also, there was confusion as to which ones were the water jars and which ones were sports drink. Crowds are good, the course is ok, but some stretches seem to go forever without a turn, which can be a little boring. I will keep doing it because it is close to home, but it is definitely not the most exciting or scenic marathon.
4.0

By: Chicago C.

Posted: December 09, 2010

Fast course; well organized; world-class runners

I PR'd but missed a BQ by 96 seconds. Packet pickup was smooth, with various speakers all day. Buses to the start run on time. Lots of port-a-johns. Cold temps at the start. Long, straight roads - nice, but somewhat boring. Pace groups were great. Plenty of water stops and support. I did not care for the sport drink. But I met a lot of the best runners in the USA there. I'd do it again. I also beat my other 2010 marathons times: Chicago (4 minutes); Sunburst (7 minutes); Martian (3 minutes) and Disney (27 minutes).
5.0

By: Rob H.

Posted: December 08, 2010

PERFECT!!!

Once again, CIM put together another great race. Every detail was handled, and there were porta-potties in abundance at the start. I don't know what kind of MoJo they have, but the weather was perfect. This was my 5th CIM and the City of Sacto knows how to throw a marathon party. Whenever I can, I will always return.
5.0

By: nick c.

Posted: December 06, 2010

No better place to run your first marathon

Lucky break for 2010 CIM, weather-wise. Temporature was in the 40s, with sunshine and no wind. Perfect condition. I ran my first marathon and got my BQ. Organization was great. Getting back the goody bag at the finish was amazingly fast. For the food, I was impressed with the warm tomato soup, which made a big difference after the run, especially if it's cold. I stayed in Larkspur Landing Hotel, which provided a shuttle bus to the start. PLUS we got a VIP ticket (free) from hotel to stay in a warm tent before the race, only a hundred yards from the gate. Highly recommend the hotel if you run CIM.
5.0

By: Javier P.

Posted: April 09, 2010

Great race to qualify for Boston

This race was special for me since it was my first Boston Qualifier. Loved it it was cool and relatively fast. Only thing that sucked was waiting in the cold for the race to start. It was all worth it. Till this day the photo at the finish is still my favorite. I would recommend this race to anybody looking to qualify for Boston.
5.0

By: Katie M.

Posted: January 19, 2010

Awesome Boston Qualifier or First Marathon

Pros- Nice cool (or cold) weather Great elevation - moderate uphills and downhills, but pretty flat Great aid stations Consistent crowd Support Well organized overall Cons- T-shirt was REALLY ugly Not very scenic Start line is a long drive from downtown Sacramento, and the buses leave you standing in cold for a long time
4.0

By: Dora Carias

Posted: January 12, 2010

A very enjoyable race.

I ran the 2009 CIM Marathon and loved it. Although getting up extremely early (around 4 a.m.) to be at the bus pick-up by 5 a.m. was not pleasant (the weather was extremely cold and it was still very dark), by the time I was finishing I felt very accomplished and happy to have taken on this challenge. The course can be fast if you train properly, but all of the downhills do take a heavy toll on your legs. After mile 13, you begin to feel your quads and hamstrings. So it is important to plan your race and split times to not go out very fast and then pay for it. The course will get to you if you do not pace yourself. I ran with the pace teams and it was a TREMENDOUS help. I really appreciated this. I left the pace team about 3 miles before the finish, but I'm pretty sure they made it exactly on time. I finished several minutes before the time I wanted. This was great. I had a PR but I feel like I really worked for it and nothing came easy. The weather was extremely cold and windy. This affected me for a while; my ears were hurting even with a hat. The finish is really awesome. You see the capitol building and I personally got really emotional. Training for this marathon was tough and exhausting, but the rewards were worth it. I never got to the food - too many people - but there were some nice cafés around with great coffee, oatmeal and sandwiches to make you feel warm and cozy after the finish. Lying in bed after the entire ordeal, I felt extremely proud to have finished the 2009 CIM 11 minutes and 30 seconds faster than my first marathon in Death Valley the previous year. I agree that the Ultima drink they give at the aid stations is pretty bad. It tastes like cough syrup and I did not feel like it did anything for me. I carried my own gels, which were crucial; I never relied on the GU they were supposed to give at some of the stops. I feel the organization was quite good. It's not easy to have buses for so many people to take you to the starting line. It is a good idea because otherwise it would get very congested. I would run it again, hopefully under nice weather conditions.
3.0

By: Matthew B.

Posted: January 05, 2010

Well organized; fast course.

All aspects of this race within the race organizer's control were top notch, with two exceptions: aid stations and replacement drink. I ran with the 3:30 pacer and he did not know when the aid stations were coming and on which side of the street they would be on. No advance warning (no volunteers ahead of the station telling you it was coming up or other visual warning, i.e. a flag) made finding the aid stations a challenge. Add to that the congestion around the 3 - 3:30 goal times with extremely short aid stations, and you got total chaos coming into and out of the aid stations. Several times I either had to cut someone off, was cut off, or altogether missed aid stations because I couldn't get there. Several people tripped and fell. This was made even worse when the aid stations were coupled with the relay exchange stations. What a mess. Ultima is crap, in my opinion, and I'm getting tired of the prevalence of this stuff at marathons. I wish they'd forever ban that stuff from endurance events. For half marathon and below, I can tolerate it; but when you're out running 3 hours or more, you can't get by on the additives in that stuff. Race organizers would tell you to have a friend hand you a bottle (what about that illegal assistance?) or load up on other supplements (did that), but why not just pick a better drink? I don't know where others are coming from regarding scenery. There is nothing scenic about strip malls and suburbs. All nit-picking aside, this was a top-notch, well-run event for runners looking for a fast course. I PR'd here by 50 minutes and will be back again in 2010 looking to BQ.
4.0

By: rusty f.

Posted: December 20, 2009

Great race but water stations need help

There were so many things that were excellent about this race. Everything that has been talked about on this message board is true when it comes to the great course, great weather, easy expo, nice people, enthusiastic fans, beautiful view, focused yet friendly runners, willing and able pace teams and so on. The one most obvious area of improvment needed would be the aid stations. It was indeed crowded on the course and if you were on the wrong side of the road when the aid stations were upon you then you had no chance of getting over to grab some liquid if you are not willing to stop running (I personally missed 3 that I wanted to hit). They need more organized water and Ultima stations, maybe with those big flags (the ones they used for the first mile markers) so that from a distance away you know what side of the road to be on. I do not want to sound like I did not absolutely love this race, because I truly did. I PRd and loved the atmosphere of "purist" runners. I am planning on doing it again next year but just thought that this was one large area that they could improve on.
4.0

By: Jessica V.

Posted: December 17, 2009

My big PR course!

I have run CIM in '08 and '09 and absolutely love this marathon. Both years, I have posted large PR's: 45 minutes and 24 minutes, respectively. Note that the field was increased yet again and led to logistical issues in '09. Here are my thoughts: 1) This is a fast, downhill course but it does have rolling hills. Most of the "hills" are barely noticeable, UNLESS you ran the first downhill miles unwisely. For each hill, you are rewarded with a nice downhill twice as long. Do your hill training, study the course elevation chart and, by all means, attend the course talk at the expo! 2) I would usually recommend taking the bus, but this year was a pain! Our downtown hotel was promised two bus pickups, of which none came. After waiting 30 minutes with 100 other marathoners, we finally walked the few blocks to the main pick up area. We lost precious time for start line prep. Fortunately, due to the huge number of porta-potties and an easy bag drop, I was able to line up near my pace group a few minutes before the gun. 3) The first couple of miles were very crowded. Also, watch out for all of the warm-up gear thrown in the street! I blame the thoughtless runners who don't follow the race instructions to toss to the sidelines. 4) Yes, the weather was cold! The freezing temps at the start turned some of the water stops into skating rinks. I slipped and fell at mile 4. I was lucky, but it could have been bad. Freezing conditions were forecasted days before. They should have been prepared for icing. 5) I think the course is beautiful and crowd support was fantastic. Yes, there are a few quiet areas, but this is so minor that I can't believe some complain about it. 6) The increase in participants led to a very congested finish area. The capitol mall is too small for all of the runners and their family now. The food line was long and you had to push through the masses to find the bag pick up in the back. Once you got there, the food options were good and the bag pick up was very well organized. 7) Other comments: the expo is fairly small but packet pick up was easy. The tech shirts are nice with long- and short-sleeve options, and the medals are great! Sac is a neat town with great restaurant and hotel options. Old Sac, the capitol building and the river give the town personality. Over all, I love this race and will probably run it again. If they raise the number of entrants again, I may rethink it. I had planned to run CIM '10 to BQ for 2011. However, Boston is filling up in November, so CIM is now too late - an important factor that now has me looking at an October marathon.
4.0

By: Irina S.

Posted: December 14, 2009

Nice job but very cold weather

This is my 4th CIM (and the 3rd "finished"), and for me it is a nice, local race. It is not very flat - like every one here states, be prepared for rolling hills, with the last one after mile 21 - but our Sac hills are nothing compared to San Fran or Atlanta... so, it is not so bad. It is a faster course than San Fran's by far, with a very good, flat finish and lots of cheering. The water stations are well spaced, but this year they were not consistent with water/sports drink placement, and the sports drink was terrible. They did have it available to try at the expo, so the runners could choose to bring their own sports drink (or tablets) as my friend did, and it seemed to work OK. I think that it is well organized; I never had problems with bus pick ups, but I do advise getting there right at 5 a.m. to get on one of the first few busses - the trip to the start takes about 40 minutes. Do not wait till the last minute to drop off your sweats - it got a little crazy 10 minutes before the start time. I found the pace groups very helpful and did not experience unusual congestion at the start (unlike some previous commenters). In fact, it was a lot better than some marathons I ran in other cities. A few points you should know: the middle of the marathon (approximately miles 10 - mile 20) is run on a long, seemingly endless street, with no interesting landmarks (other than strip malls), and it can be a little boring. Be prepared and power through it! It gets a lot better after mile 20! Expo is OK; I am not a huge fan of a tech shirt they produce each year, but all of this is not important.
5.0

By: Thomas P.

Posted: December 14, 2009

Great qualifying race

The course was prettier than I expected, and some gentle rollers made the course fast and interesting. Organization was excellent, and my pace group leader was a world-class runner who was superb. Highly recommended.
4.0

By: Dan C.

Posted: December 13, 2009

CIM is pretty much what it claims if you're ready

Cold and windy weather this year didn't help, but it was still had a good race. The increased numbers were not a good thing. Time to cap it. Food at the end for late arrivals was a mess, as was the sweat bag situation at the start - two trucks!?! C'mon, people. The race itself was everything they say it is, but you need to look at the excellent course description materials provided on the website. Water stations were OK, with great volunteers, but they were not well organized regarding the sequence of water and electrolytes. Fast runners would have trouble. Pace teams are awesome.
4.0

By: Marco P.

Posted: December 13, 2009

Grrreat but watch the dooownhiiills!

Not a good race for softies from the tropics used to warm weather, nor for those who do not do their hill (and preferably downhill) training. Also, not the race for those in need of endless fan support. Other than that, great course, terrific organization (1:26 ratio of porta-potties to runners, though there was a 1:3750 ratio of sweatpants drop-off buses to runners...), and a throng of volunteers as good as they get anywhere (thank you all).
5.0

By: Rick K.

Posted: December 12, 2009

Excellent Mid-Size Marathon

A lot of people run this race simply to qualify for Boston, as I did. And if you can't qualify here, you probably can't anywhere. Net elevation decline, very cool weather, great race organization, enthusiastic and friendly spectators... what else could you wish for?
5.0

By: jake j.

Posted: December 12, 2009

Not as good as reported

This is my fourth marathon and probably least favorite. The beginning was nice - several miles of rolling hills and quiet roads. And the end was down some nice tree-lined streets in the city, so also not bad. But unless you like wide, flat streets that stretch as far as you can see ahead, as well as strip malls, the middle section was fairly miserable. The race organization was average to below average, it was hard to find water or anything at the finish. During the run, I'm not sure where the energy station was. I'm sure it was where they said it would be but it wasn't announced when I ran by anyway. Also, the sports drink they chose was Ultima, something that I just can't stomach. All in all, I can't say I enjoyed it a whole lot, but it was a cold, cold day which isn't my favorite running weather.
3.0

By: Noah S.

Posted: December 11, 2009

One-way freight train....

This was my second year running this marathon and personally I think there are very few (or none) marathons like it. Picture getting your most intense runners together, and regardless of weather conditions, water stops, crowd support, etc., people are going for their goals (PR, Boston qualifying, etc.). The concentration level is the most intense I have seen - not a lot of talking or crowd waving or high fives in the group I was with. A lot of people think the course is "easy" - it's mostly downhill, but it can be grueling in its own way, especially if downhill running wasn't a regular part of your training. There are a few descent uphills thrown in along the way too. The organization and support are excellent. I don't doubt that there were a lot of PRs (I set one) and BQs, but I attribute that more to the energy and drive of those around you than to the course itself; it is intense, and if you have a goal and you are ready to push it a bit, this race is for you....
4.0

By: David I.

Posted: December 10, 2009

Loved the course, but those water stops...

CIM is a fast course. The rolling hills weren't too bad and the finish was flat and fast. They were inconsistent about which drink came first at the water stops (water of Ultima). This needs to be changed. It was windy, but the temp was great. The start had more bathrooms than you could count, which meant little or no waiting. Being able to stay on the bus during the below-freezing morning until the start was GREAT! Thanks to all who gave their time for us to run.
4.0

By: Gina S.

Posted: December 10, 2009

BQ'd for the first time in my 11th Marathon

After running marathons for six years with fairly consistent times, I took 25 minutes off of my previous best time and qualified for Boston. I am psyched! Only complaints were with the bus to the start (nightmare), sweat bag drop-off (I got hit in the face by someone hurling their bag toward the truck) and organization at the finish line (I couldn't find a bottle of water...). But the course was very fast and I had fun! I will run it again for sure.
5.0

By: Gregg B.

Posted: December 09, 2009

Ditto

Ditto to the comment below. I should've stayed in a pack - that would've blocked the wind. The medical tent (cramp) was outstanding. Good food, good expo, helpful volunteers, great fans, fast course, BQ, what more?
5.0

By: Romie B.

Posted: December 09, 2009

Do your own homework

It depends on what you like and need. I needed 4:00:59 for a BQ and I missed it by 29 seconds. Ugh! I'm happy with the race, though. Overall, a GREAT experience. CONS: 1. If they tell you that you need to purchase a bus ticket, don't believe it. The cost at the expo was $10 to pick us up from the hotel. Race day we all had to walk four blocks from the hotel to expo building, and loaded up there. No ticket was ever collected. 2. We had to run in below freezing temps and a 15 mph headwind. It was 29 at the start! (Obviously that's not their fault.) But... the back of the bus was freezing. The front of the bus was boiling. (We were at the back.) 3. The first mile was tremendously slow unless you were in front. Pace groups are not in front. I took 11:05 to get through mile 1 - and that was VERY downhill. It was too crowded to do otherwise. It should have been an easy 9:00 pace for that one. 4. Did someone say, "undulating hills?" To a Chicagoan, that means mini-Boston. Do more hill training if you come from flat areas. It's not terribly difficult, but it's just never-ending until mile 22. Be prepared mentally to be going either up or down. 5. Water stops clog up. I was told that relay areas would be even bigger this year. No kidding. There were good course directions telling us to stay on the correct side for the relay or the marathon. However, it still made for some crowded areas, which made pacing more challenging. 6. Water tables were confusing. I actually went backwards four times - either the cup was taken right as I was about to take it, or the table ended. Longer tables maybe? More volunteers? They were also inconsistent about the sequence of water and sports drink. Not good. PROS: 1. Baggage handling was scary, as two trucks held all of the bags. All of the bags were simply thrown into the back, with no organization. SURPRISE! All bags were laid out in an orderly fashion for us at the finish. So don't be nervous. :) 2. I thoroughly enjoyed the course description seminar. Very helpful and on target. Memorable. It helped to keep your mind focused during the race to have specific direction, landmarks, etc. Those are the specifics of that day's experience to watch for, but I really had a fantastic day. The course has good crowd support. A couple of areas without as much support were welcome, offering a chance to regroup and find your pace. After the bridge at H Street (mile 22), you can speed up; there are no more crowds, but also no more hills, so it's time to FLY!
4.0

By: mark s.

Posted: December 08, 2009

Ain't as easy as they say it is!

I notice on the CIM website they boast that it's "one of the fastest, if not the fastest, course in the country." Just because Bert Yasso says so doesn't necessarily make it true. Advertising this race as an easy qualifier for the Boston Marathon has always been the race organizers' bread and butter. This is my third marathon of the year, and I'd say both of the others were marginally easier. The CIM starts with 16 miles of rolling hills that do take their toll on your legs, and although it ends roughly 300 feet lower than the starting line, you'd never really know it. The last 10 miles ARE flat, and no one really minds that to finish a race! I did enjoy the run, and I'm three for three qualifying for Boston this year, so it's not meant as a complaint. But you might be surprised, as this run is more difficult that you might imagine.
5.0

By: Kendra S.

Posted: December 08, 2009

GREAT Experience!

Truly, overall a great experience. I had heard so many positive things about this marathon before I signed up for it - mostly about the course being "fast." The flat, fast course was just what I was looking for to try and qualify for Boston. I did not expect the fan support to be so BIG, and the scenery to be beautiful! I am the kind of runner who LOVES the cheers, the funny signs, the music and the high-fives. This marathon has that and more. I also found that the camaraderie amongst the runners was amazing and positive as well. Maybe it's because CIM has only marathoners (and some pretty elite ones at that), and none of the 5K, 10K, or half marathon distractions so many other marathons have. CIM was one of the best organized and runner supported marathons I have run. I only have a couple minor suggestions to add. 1.The water/sports drink stations should always be consistent with either water or the sports drink served first. I did not get over quickly enough once, not realizing the order was different, and there was no one holding out water. It was not a problem for the moment, as I carry some of my own for that reason, and a fellow runner saw my dilemma and offered me his (another example of great sportmanship). 2. Because it was a cold day, many runners kept their "throw away" warm clothes on instead of using the bag check. The problem with that was that for the first 4 miles of the race, I spent a lot of time dodging and hurdling over discarded sweatpants, gloves, etc. This is not the organizers' fault (the bag-check service was great), but I was actually hit in the back of the head with a jacket, and wish that the runners would have been a little more careful about throwing their clothes off to the side, not the middle of the road. 3. The line to have my finisher photo taken was too long (so I didn't bother), as were many of the food lines. But, I understand there were many runners finishing close to my time, and had it not been so cold, I probably would have been more patient! Super small nit-picky complaints; overall, I enjoyed this marathon- and I qualified for Boston!!!
5.0

By: Tom B.

Posted: December 08, 2009

Not as fast as I expected, but very well organized

Organization was superb. Website had lots of information. Pre-race e-mails were nice, though I left home Friday and didn't get the last one. Nice expo. Buses were on time. (I heard on the bus radio that some were having problems.) We were able to stay on the bus until shortly before the start, which was very welcome as it was cold (about 30). Bag drop-off was a bit chaotic because of the crowd. I suggest a big sign to guide runners which truck to go to, as vocal directions could not be heard in all the hubbub. I think the "flat and fast" hype is a bit overdone. Though there is an overall elevation drop, the course is rolling with plenty of uphill grades too - and some significant ones, especially in the first half. I train on hills all the time, but wasn't expecting these. I am not a spectator fan, but there seemed to be quite a few, more than I thought there would be. I know the race managers can't help the weather. The cold made the race quite an ordeal for me. The day started clear and I dressed lightly, expecting the sun to come out and warm things up fast. Instead it clouded over, and we were running into a cold headwind much of the way. I never did warm up. I think the cold stress hour after hour, the wind, and the hills is why I didn't make my BQ time. The sun finally did come out for the finish. Very nice medal. The food was exceptional: pancakes, soup, fruit, cookies, and other things, all of which helped chase away the cold. Bag pick-up was nicely organized and efficient. Results were posted on big bulletin boards, though they stopped before my finishing time. Had to take a taxi back to our hotel. I would have been willing to pay a bit more at registration for shuttle transport.
4.0

By: Angela A.

Posted: December 07, 2009

An awesome marathon experience

I may be biased because I ended up with a PR by 12 minutes after running this marathon, but it was a great experience from start to finish. Registration was quick and simple; my questions to the race directors regarding the flavor of GU were answered very promptly. The race expo was fun and clinic speakers were very interesting and educational. I stayed at the Embassy Suites, where getting a bus to the start of the race was very easy. It was a bit of a chilly morning, so it was appreciated when we were allowed to wait on the bus to stay warm before the race start. Many people got off the bus to use a port-a-potty (a ratio of one for every 25 runners, which basically means very short or no line-ups) and then got back on the bus to stay warm. I was a bit concerned at the gear check, because with 7,000 runners, there were only 2 trucks to keep everyone's bags, but this proved not to be a problem. The temperature of the race was around freezing at the start and probably didn't get much warmer; however I found it to be very comfortable for running a marathon. (That being said, I am from western Canada so this temperature was much warmer than at home.) I wore shorts, a long-sleeved shirt, compression socks, gloves and a headband. Sometimes the wind was a bit chilly, so I ended up wearing my headband for the entire race and was very happy to have it. The course itself is beautiful. This was the first marathon I've done that was not entirely in a city, and I loved it. There were constant hills in the first half of the race, but they weren't at all steep (sometimes I didn't every realize I was running up a hill) and it's good to use different muscle groups than if the course was totally flat. While the course wasn't completely lined with spectators, I was still surprised at how many came out to cheer (and cheer loudly!), and just when I felt like I could use a boost, the course would go around a corner and there would be crowds cheering for us. To avoid over-crowding through the finish line, there were separate finish mats for men and women. The finish area was picture-perfect and extremely well organized; it took no time at all to get the awesome medal, Mylar blanket, chip removed, etc., etc. The food served at the finish was pancakes and soup, as well as the usual bagels, bananas, etc. The most pleasant surprise, however, was how easy and fast it was to get my gear at the end. I don't know how they organized 7,000 bags to make them easy to find at the finish, but I'm sure glad they did. My one and only complaint is that although GU gels were promised at 3 different locations throughout the race, I only saw them being given out near the end (mile 21, I think?). If I hadn't brought one and been given another one by a fellow runner, I would have been in trouble. My impression is that CIM is a race for serious marathoners. Many people were trying to qualify for Boston, or had a goal in the 3:00-3:30 range. There weren't too many "just want to finish" runners, although for them, this race would have been equally as awesome. For me personally, this was my first marathon experience that I can describe as "ideal." I loved the whole weekend, and hope to do it again someday!
5.0

By: Dave L.

Posted: December 07, 2009

Good race for non-megathoners!

I just ran the 2009 edition, and have run this once before in 2005. It was quite cold and windy this year, which made for a more difficult run, but as usual, the organizing was great. There aren't a lot of spectators, but then it's 30 degrees and windy out! Once in town, the spectators and music come out to play though. There were some problems with the race bag trucks this year. Perhaps it was due to the school buses being open to stay warm, but it seemed like all of the runners waited until the last moment to drop their bags. It was a horrible melee, and many thoughtless runners began throwing their bags at the attendants.
4.0

By: Bob G.

Posted: December 06, 2009

Great organization, fast course, but cold/windy

I ran this race in 2009. The organization is great. They had plenty of buses to lug us out to the start. They had a ton of port-a-potties both at the start and along the way. The toughest thing was the wind; it was really windy in our face for a good portion of the race (I guess that's a downside possibility of a point-to-point course). Besides the wind, it's a really fast course with rolling hills, and I got a BQ, so I can't complain.
5.0

By: Jennie K.

Posted: November 08, 2009

Great race overall!

It was very cold, and we didn't have a chance to warm up. Wait time for bus pick-up from Sacramento was long, and we were very cold.
4.0

By: Mike T.

Posted: March 19, 2009

One of the best

By definition there is no such thing as an easy marathon, but if there was, this would be it. Great course, well organized, fantastic volunteers and spectators. Highly recommended!!
5.0

By: Rick Kerr

Posted: January 23, 2009

Just as Advertised

Nice, fast course made faster by the cool, foggy weather throughout. I particularly liked being able to pace myself by following the various predicted finish time groups, e.g. 3, 3 1/2, 4 hours.... I hadn't seen this before and thought it was a great idea.
5.0

By: Tracey E.

Posted: January 23, 2009

Nice race that seems to have grown too quickly

Well organized logistically but they seemed to be overwhelmed by the number of runners. I missed several water stops because the volunteers couldn't keep up. The plastic cups were dangerous and difficult to drink from. Runners were really crowded on the course.
3.0

By: David Perotti

Posted: December 28, 2008

Will run it again

I have run this race twice. I do not remember it being so great the first time! Well done. Organized, plenty of spectators and just a great time. GU was provided at three different times and plenty of water and sports drink. Pretty funny thing they had at mile 20... they had a fake wall you ran through with a grim reaper standing there! I was struggling and still thought it was kind of funny. :) I saw Santa, Winnie the Pooh, the Grinch, Mickey Mouse and other crazy folks dressed up. There is such a great atmosphere at this race.
5.0

By: Michele S.

Posted: December 19, 2008

Do NOT rely on buses to get to start on time!

The CIM advertised the buses as the BEST way to get to the start. HAH! I was at one of the Folsom hotels for pickup at 5 a.m. The bus did not pick us up until well after 6 a.m., as the bus driver said the first load was full so she had to come back for our hotel. This load was packed as well. We got dropped off one mile downhill from the start with fewer than 10 minutes to hoof it up to the start line. At least we got our warm-up in, right? Had to strip and throw my race bag to the side of the road in order to get to the start on time. So I ended up losing my race bag with two pairs of sweats, my iPod, and my sunglasses case (lost and found never found any of it). Had to fumble with getting my hydration pack on while running, which meant it wasn't as secure as it should have been and it fell off completely at mile 17 or so and lost lots of time going back for it and getting it situated again. WAY too much anxiety before the race even started. Next year I'll have my husband drop me off early and I'll leisurely walk that uphill mile to the start instead! Other than that, it was fun to do my first marathon right in my hometown. The spectators' support/cheering was phenomenal.
3.0

By: John Tackett

Posted: December 18, 2008

Great race, but...

Came out to Sacramento to a) visit with relatives, and b) run the CIM. Had a great time doing both. I had just qualified for Boston at the Atlanta Marathon 10 days earlier, so I had no pressure to qualify at this event. The expo was nice, but I almost forgot I had purchased an additional tech shirt. I was leaving when I looked at my bib and saw it listed on it. Perhaps a card needs to be sent out before the race to "remind" folks. I registered early, so it just slipped my mind. The course had the right number of hills (being from Atlanta, I train on hills), and the weather was a bit of an issue for me (foggy and moist), but overall I had a good run. The water stations need to be expanded a bit to avoid bottlenecks, and I would prefer digital clocks on the course and I had a hard time hearing times given out by the volunteers (I am partially deaf). At the finish, I would suggest that the food be inside the runners' area. I saw a lot of non-runners standing with runners to get food. I also had to retrieve my own bag at the end of the race, but they had it set up so well that it was not a problem. Spectators were light at some spots, but at others I was surprised to see them. Thanks for being there. This was my 12th marathon in 3 years, and rates as one of the best. Looking forward to running it again. And the finisher's medal ROCKS!!
4.0

By: John O.

Posted: December 17, 2008

Great Race

I flew in from the East Coast for a late-season marathon. I was not disappointed and ran a BQ time. Course was outstanding, with slightly rolling hills for the first half and a fast, flat finish. Organization was superb and bus service from the outlying hotels was well run. Enjoyed the expo, and overall the race was a great experience - kudos to the CIM staff and volunteers!
5.0

By: Brett S.

Posted: December 17, 2008

Great course, good fans, needs better organization

First CIM. Really enjoyed the course, as it was very scenic. Fan support was excellent, especially the last few miles. Staging area was good, with plenty of porta-potties. Lots of confusion at the start, as most pace group leaders didn't come to the start area until a minute before the gun. On-course, the water stations were plentiful, if a little disorganized. And the plastic cups were horrible. You couldn't squeeze and pour as they'd shatter. The last mile of the course needs barriers, as the fans crowded onto the street barely giving enough room for a runner to get through. Food at the end should be in an area that only runners can access. Too many people to get through to what was a poor selection of recovery food.
4.0

By: Michael Antrim

Posted: December 16, 2008

Fast terrific course in a great city....

I would like to say that this was my 37th marathon and 2nd fastest. I missed breaking my PR by 32 seconds due to a miscalculation on my part. The catch to this is that I set my PR at 194 pounds in 1991, when I ran a 3:26:41. Now, 17 years later, I'm at 200 pounds. Yes, 6 pounds heavier, I ran a 3:27:12... and this says a lot about the course. If only I had run around 180-185, the PR was there. I will be back, as Arnold says, as the crowd, the course, the weather, the beautiful State of California and the beautiful people made the race unforgettable. The volunteers did a great job in shouting out the times in addition to the current pace per mile, which made it easy to just run as hard as possible. This is as fast a course as I have ever run. The drop-off could be a bit improved, but other than that, it was on the money in every way.... Thank you to all of the people of Fulsom and Sacramento. I will be back many times to run this race.
5.0

By: Erin b.

Posted: December 15, 2008

Good Marathon

Organized very well. Great, fast course. Runners beware - while there is an elevation difference at the start and finish, the first half has a lot of rolling hills. Only complaint was the food at the end of the race was not good and it should've been in the "Runners Only" area.
4.0

By: Markham M.

Posted: December 12, 2008

Another GREAT CIM

Thank you to CIM for another great day of racing! I qualified for Boston again and also ran a PR. This is just a great race. I've run numerous other marathons, but this is one I always look forward to running. Thank you and keep up the great work.
5.0

By: Calvin C.

Posted: December 12, 2008

DAMN!!! This Marathon Rocks!

The CIM is a nonstop, scenic, breathtaking, roller coaster of an express train, barreling down the tracks from Folsom to Sacramento, treating its 6000 plus passengers like first-class, traveling rock stars. From beginning: easy access from the airport to the hotels, easy walking distance to the expo, easy bus pickup to the start line, all the way to the end: a great finish area with a separate finish line for men and women, accommodating staff to help you claim your luggage, and did I mention one of the most cleverly artistic finishers medals I have ever seen? Perfect weather and a little help from Kevin the 3-hour pace guy made for a great sub 3 PR. This was a memorable trip that will be hard to beat. OK, the only negative is that with so many half and relay runners, a different start time for the marathoners would have helped ease congestion on the course. I was bumping elbows and getting my feet kicked at a 6:47 pace. With that said, I say get on board soon while the gettin's still good.
5.0

By: Guillermo R.

Posted: December 12, 2008

Awesome!

This marathon was definitely worth the long hike from Atlanta, GA. I highly recommend this marathon to those of you (serious runners) looking for a no-nonsense marathon and wanting to set a PB. I have one MAJOR suggestion for the organizers. Please extend the length of the hydration stations. The water stations are too short for a field of 6,000+ runners, which results in missed stops and artificial pauses because of all of the bottle-necking that occurs in those areas. Too many runners were flocking the water stops at the same time, and there were not enough volunteers to dispense the cups. Other than that, it was flawless....
4.0

By: Venkat R.

Posted: December 11, 2008

Great marathon for PR and BQ

I have run this marathon three years in a row. They are the only marathons I have run, and I've had a great experience each time. Improved from 3:53 to 3:32 to 3:28 and qualified for Boston. The pacers are phenomenal, and crowd support fantastic. What's more, about 25% to 30% get a PR or a BQ.
5.0

By: Rhett B.

Posted: December 11, 2008

A mostly great event!

As advertised, this is a fast course (I missed Boston, but a friend made it comfortably), and it is largely well organized, which makes it a positive experience. The expo was good, with enough variety among the vendors to keep things interesting. The finish area was laid out well, which made connecting up after the race easy. The one hiccup this year was with the buses to the start - the buses are supposed to run from downtown Sacramento to the start in Folsom between 5:00 and 6:00. We arrived at 5:30, and the line was a half-hour long. We didn't get on a bus until 6:10, and we didn't arrive to the starting area until 6:52 (for a 7:00 start). I was still getting my sweats off when the gun went off, so I missed stepping off with my pace group. There were many runners behind us in the bus line, so I'm sure they got off quite a bit later. Who needs that stress at the beginning of a race? I understand that last year if you arrived at 5:30 you walked onto a bus, but obviously something was amiss this time.
4.0

By: Ryan O.

Posted: December 11, 2008

my favorite, by far!

This is the best marathon I've run by a long shot. It's a real runner's race: tons of really fast and competitive people, great point-to-point course (fast, but the rollers in the first half makes it honest), a wonderful finishing stretch in California's capital city, very well organized, good crowds, perfect weather, nice city, logistically easy, perfectly sized, a city that's proud of this event and its long storied history, and even the shirts are top quality. Dude, what more could you want?
5.0

By: Yali F.

Posted: December 10, 2008

A Fast but Boring Course

This course is not as fast and flat as they made it out to be, compared to some really flat ones like Chicago, Richmond or even Philly. There are big downhills - which turned out to be hard on the legs - and some small, rolling hills. The boring course is compounded by heavy fog and dark skies in this time of year. I agree with some comments by others from last year's race: the water stations are random; sometimes water first, then sport drink (which was so diluted it tested awful), and sometimes water second, on the left side or right. The support from locals is great but the organizers only offered transportation to the start without considering how runners can get back to their hotels, which scattered in Sacto 2-5 miles apart (and these are the marathon hotels too): too far to walk (for checking out hotel on the same day), and this is not a city where you just hail a cab. I'd prefer they charge $5-10 more to provide the post-race shuttle back to hotels. The finish area is very nice; other than that, the course is mostly boring with not much to see. The women's long-sleeve shirt was quite stylish, but too thin, with cheap, see-through fabric. Overall, a nicely organized race, but compared to others, I can't rate this run as outstanding.
4.0

By: Ed W.

Posted: December 09, 2008

Getting too big!

Weather was perfect. The course is rolling during the first half and fairly flat during the second half. I have run this race 5 times; as the race gets bigger, the logistics are becoming a nightmare. Lot of aid stations were not well prepared. The food at end of race really needs improvement, and waiting in line was no fun. This is still a great race, but they need help. Either have a lot more food tents or limit the race size. I do not like to complain, but this was a much better run when it was smaller.
3.0

By: Ken J.

Posted: December 09, 2008

Good times

-The start was great. Plenty of porta-potties (especially if you walked beyond the first few of them, which somehow had lines when ones farther down the row were empty!). The wide road start meant little stress. I crossed the line in 10 seconds, without pushing to the front. -I was a little discouraged to see people littering their clothes and trash all along the course. If we drop our stuff near an aid station, it's probably a lot easier to clean up. -Rolling hills during the first half were not as bad as I had feared, but driving the course the day prior was helpful to put it into perspective. Had I not read comments here from prior years or really studied the course, I might have been disappointed by how the reality measured up to the fast-fast-fast descriptions. I happened to like the speed of the course, and the varied elevation, but may have had a different assessment had I not BQ'd and PR'd. -Big thanks to volunteers - very energetic. -Bus to start was convenient, but nobody checked that I was a paid rider. I was, but I fear some potential stowaways could have taken seats from other paid riders. Anyone who ran the Seafair Marathon in 2008 knows the potential perils of that (i.e. the challenge of getting to the finish is irrelevant if you can't get to the start). To be certain, I did not hear of any difficulty regarding this at CIM. The event is so well organized that I imagine there was some built-in slack in the system. -Medal was huge and shiny. Olympian in scale and design. -Crowd briefly narrowed the running lane to 2-3 abreast at half-marathon and 20 mile (AKA "The Wall" arch) marks. Great energy, but a little scary and cumbersome. Thanks to all who organized, volunteered and cheered on a very enjoyable morning.
4.0

By: Eamon O.

Posted: December 09, 2008

Lightning fast course, but issue re: bus to start

This was my 1st CIM and I really enjoyed the fast course. The weather was perfect - cool (high 30s to low 40s) and no wind. This is apparently typical. Minor rolling hills in 1st part of the course are not steep or long enough to pose any sort of a problem. The second half is a slight downhill all the way to the finish. Perfect course to run a PR or Boston qualifying time. There was a pretty serious problem with transporting runners to the start (in Folsom), however. Buses left Sacramento between 5 and 6 a.m. I got in a VERY long line at 5:40. Waiting til 5:40 was a mistake. Get on the first bus at 5 a.m. if you can. My bus arrived at the start just as the race began at 7 a.m. I literally started running as I exited the bus. And there were at least a couple hundred people on buses that hadn't yet arrived at that point. The race director says he prides himself on never making the same mistake 2 years in a row, so I expect the bus issue will be fixed next year. Other than that little organizational glitch, everything was first-rate. Well stocked aid stations and more than adequate spectator support. Volunteers called out the time and pace at each mile marker, which was very helpful for those who forgot to pack their forerunner (whoops). First-rate race.
4.0

By: Jeffrey F.

Posted: December 09, 2008

Great race

Absolutely great marathon. Ran the CIM in 2007 and knew I had to run it again in 2008. The EXPO is well organized, the course is amazing and the support during the run was first rate. A big thank you to the volunteers who braved the cold to support the runners. I for one really appreciate you getting up early on a Sunday morning to volunteer your time. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! I will definitely be back in 2009.
5.0

By: Mark F.

Posted: December 08, 2008

Great Job, CIM!!!

I just got back from the 2008 CIM. The organization was great! Capping it at 6,000 runners makes for a much better overall experience! Everything was easy: Expo, transportation to start and lots of port-a-potties!!!! I have run 6 different marathons and this was near the top!!
4.0

By: Chris K.

Posted: December 08, 2008

Cool, fast, and a perfect day

An early, cool start, downhill course and zero wind made for a promising day. The course is well-known for being fast due to the net-downhill elevation and December date, but this year was perfect with absolutely no wind or adverse weather and cool temperatures the entire race. The shuttle buses to the point-to-point start were pretty convenient, considering the early start, and I got there with about 45 minutes to spare. Start line logistics were fantastic with plenty of porta-potties. As advertised, the course was quick and merciful toward the end. Finishing with the state capitol as a backdrop made for a perfect setting for a PR and first Boston qualifier. The gripes are minor. Most of these are due to the relatively low-budget nature of this race (compared to, say, Chicago, which I ran 7 weeks before). Mile markers had people calling the time rather than a visual clock - one nice thing was that they had a second person calling out your pace per mile based on clock time. Crowds are light and sparse until the end, save for a handful of main intersections. Too few aid stations and too few toward the end. Water was in plastic cups, making for tough drinking on the run. I snagged paper Cytomax cups, dumped them and refilled them from the plastic water cups to drink on the run. Next time, guys, PAPER! Zip ties for timing chips were not supplied in the envelope, nor available at the start. I laced it through my shoelaces, but it would have been one fewer thing to worry about. All in all, a fantastic race, nice course (who knew Sac was scenic?) and my first Boston qualifier to boot!
4.0

By: Vince H.

Posted: December 08, 2008

Wonderful Race!!!

The race certainly lived up to its billing as a great one. After 25 years of putting this event on, the organizers know what they're doing. I took 15 minutes off of my previous PR, and now I'll be running Boston in April!
5.0

By: Michael Archer

Posted: December 08, 2008

Glad to be a part of it.

Overall I thought the conditions were spot on for a marathon. This was my 1st CIM. Did someone say the course was hilly? Didn't seem like it much, but I guess that's relative. I love seeing the older folks out there - my inspirations for the future. They're all my heroes and heroins. You go, Helen! My one and only complaint would be that at about the 1/2, the crowd bottle-necked us a little tighter than I liked. All in all, a great race. I did better than I expected. In the words of our governor, "I'll be back!"
4.0

By: Noah S.

Posted: December 07, 2008

If you like to run, you will love this race!

WOW! This race lived up to my expectations - the organizers went out of their way to accommodate runners trying to achieve their dream marathon goal. I flew in late and missed the expo, but from e-mails I knew I could pick up my packet at the host hotel. I was a bit nervous about this, but sure enough, at 4:40 a.m. there was a very helpful volunteer getting my number and chip. Every mile was well marked and had two volunteers - one telling you your overall time and the second one telling you your pace, every mile!! In the last miles the second volunteer started telling you your projected finish times! Traffic control was excellent - weather was perfect (cloudy, 40-50s). The course does generally run downhill but I was surprised that there were a couple of uphills (not too difficult and not at the end of the race, however). There were not large crowds but there was very good enthusiasm with a band, cheerleader groups, a kick-line. There were also lots of volunteers at aid stations, which were plentiful, and well stocked with GU towards the later miles. This race caters so much to marathoners that there is no other half-marathon or other distant run going on at the same time (other than a relay which was fine). Sserious runners should not miss this race!
5.0

By: Kate Sully

Posted: December 07, 2008

Pretty Dang Good

I just finished and it was my first marathon. I really had a great time! The course was very hilly in the beginning, but if you keep in mind that for every up there is at least that much more going down, it's good. The first couple of aid stations were awful; I had to try desperately to figure out where water was and I usually had to get it from the table myself. But they got much more coordinated as it went on. I loved the random people with oranges, M&M's, pretzels, red vines, etc. I loved the Bella Vista Cheer Squad!! My 5-hour pacer was AMAZING. I was originally with the 4:45, but she was very quiet and borderline rude - unlike the chatty and positive 5-hour guy. He made it so we came in about 3 minutes early so our pics could say under 5, and he even let us walk the J Street hill. :) I used my iPod most of the way but from the "the wall" at 20 on, it is very introspective and amazing to just soak it in. It goes by fast, too! Good luck on yours! Dress warmly!
4.0

By: Larry T.

Posted: March 02, 2008

Awesome!!

This was my first marathon, and from now on, all of the others will have a tough time living up to this one. Everything was fantastic! The race director should be commended. This was very well organized and the course was so fast that I was able to qualify for Boston!
5.0

By: john l.

Posted: February 04, 2008

This course is FAST!!!

PR'd by 30 minutes. Fast course as advertised. It also helps a lot when you have an attractive lady in your pace group (who was kind enough to chat with me, despite my being way off when I guessed her age). The course wasn't great in terms of scenery... mostly residential and a few strip malls. Fan support was intoxicating at "The Wall" at mile 20. Finishing in front of the capitol while having your name announced was a nice touch.
4.0

By: Jack G.

Posted: February 03, 2008

Great Marathon

I've run New York, Chicago twice, Big Sur and this one ranks right up there. This race has a lot of heart, one of the best organized marathons I have run, and a really interesting field of runners with many repeat customers. Fast, scenic, enthusiastic course. GREAT mid-size marathon with lots of personality and experience.
5.0

By: M.B. M.

Posted: January 03, 2008

A Great Day for Running!

Great course; good organization and support. It was a great day all around. I qualified for Boston and all is well in the world... well almost! Thank you, CIM!!
4.0

By: Alicia D.

Posted: December 27, 2007

A solid Boston qualifier

Course: People talk about the hills, but I would call them rollers, really. They're pretty easy if you include any hills in your training. Just make sure you don't kill yourself on them in the first half so you can really go all out in second half. The neighborhoods were nice; not too many turns, making it a fast course (in addition to the net downhill slope, of course). Atmosphere: There were tons of fans who braved the cold. Cowbells were great. Very supportive. Aid stations: Can't complain too much. I carried my own gels and a water bottle. When I drained my own fluid and began taking from aid stations, I found that some people were using the cups marked with "Gu2O" to serve water - while others were using them to serve Gu2O. It was confusing and kind of annoying to have to yell, "Water, water water" before approaching the volunteers. But that's not a big deal, really. Weather: A nine out of 10 (one deduction point for the wind, but it really wasn't too bad, and the temps were perfect for running... about 40ish at the start). Post-race: I could not find the gear pickup. There were no signs indicating gear pickup, no signs indicating food, nothing to point you in the right direction. I had to just walk around through the crowd to try to figure it out. Overall, I thought it was a great race, though, plus I qualified for Boston (and ran even faster than I expected).... I would definitely do this one again. Oh, and go to the Pyramid Alehouse afterward!
4.0

By: Reyana E.

Posted: December 13, 2007

A PR marathon

Overall I thought the marathon was well-done. It was windy and hilly. However I did not notice the hills or the wind that much. I ran 3:22 and got a PR, but compared to a course like Chicago, CIM is hilly. But if you train for it, you will be fine. My legs were a bit beat up by mile 15 - that's what you get for running up and over all those hills. I had a problem getting enough water in. The aid stations were confusing. Some had water in the front or on the left side of the road and some had water on the right side of the road or at the beginning of the station. The cups of water I did get had like 1-2 ounces of water in them and I had to get two or three cups, just to get enough water. I did not get any food at the finish; it was too crowded and I did not see the food at all. But it was nice having the announcer say my name as I finished. With such a small race, I crossed the finish line alone.
3.0

By: Marty B.

Posted: December 11, 2007

A Good Day!

Perfect conditions and BIG fun! Great organization and I love the shirts! (A bit chaotic at the finish, though.) PR'd by 20 minutes so, yeah, I'll be back next year!!! Thanks, Sacramento! GREAT fans out there in the cold, cheering us on with music and great enthusiasm!
5.0

By: William Wittenauer

Posted: December 09, 2007

Fantastic Marathon

Great Race. I got qualified for Boston and earned a great PR to boot. Grant Carboni, the (3:45) pace guy, was superb. He helped with the nutrition and the hills. We did not even notice the hills with his guidance. A 3:45:18 chip time gets me in for my age group. The only thing to improve is to get the food at the end within the closed area so that runners could get to things. I elected to skip everything as there were to many people around blocking the way. Next year keep everyone out of the finish area. Again, Grant was the pace guy to pull me through!
4.0

By: williams r.

Posted: December 09, 2007

Great marathon, loved the fan support

This was my first marathon. I had a great time. The crowd support was awesome. This one puts the bar up high!
5.0

By: Erik K.

Posted: December 08, 2007

Just average; kind of fast

I just returned home from running CIM. I enjoyed the marathon, but compared to others, I would give it an average rating. The aid station placement was random and they were quite small. The course is OK, but compared to other marathons I have run (Grandma's, Twin Cities, Madison, Green Bay, Boston), it's very average. It is running down a 4-lane road with strip malls and homes. Although it's nice as you get close to the finish (mile 23). I agree it's relatively fast. The shirts were quite nice. With all of the great marathons out there, I think CIM thrives because there are not a lot of other fast courses at this time of year.
3.0

By: Steven S.

Posted: December 08, 2007

Very well-run event.

A very well run event. Other races could learn a lot from how this "bus to the start" event is run. Nice course. It is net downhill, but also has some inclines (rolling). Hill training should be a steady diet on your long runs for your preparation. The start is nice and wide, with little hindering traffic. I ran 2:55 and had just the right amount of company from other runners almost the whole way. Aid stations were great. I heard from others that getting gels on the course was not easy, but I carried my own. I don't know about the food after the race. I had people meet me at the finish with my clothing and only had a couple of bottles of water after along with a few snacks that I had packed. The only weakness is the results. They are hard to read and were slow to be posted online. They are still preliminary after 6 days. There are some obvious problems as well in the results, so I will wait and see if they disqualify some of the folks who ran 60 minutes or so for the second half of the race. People like chip timing, but it does present problems in trying to get the results to be correct since there is little in the way of redundant checking. It would be nice to have a few more timing mats on the course, but that is not something that is really needed on a point-to-point course to catch cheaters. All miles were clearly marked with sign and tall feather flags for easy spotting. The half had a timing mat and the 20K and 30K were also marked. I never saw a 10K or 40K sign. It would be nice if there were a more proper companion race rather than the 2.62 mile fun run. I would think an out-and-back 10K or something would work, but then again, they have something that really works so well as just a marathon. The level of competition was also very tough. Tons of very good runners. Compared to a race like Dallas Marathon, this one wins hands down.
5.0

By: David H.

Posted: December 07, 2007

OK, but improvements possible

This was a nice race overall, but could benefit from some improvements. The pros: * Fast course. The hills are minor. The declines are gradual. Fast times are possible. * Easy-to-see mile markers. * Good expo. * Lots of very helpful volunteers. * Good website. * Gear check was easy, and pickup at the end was better than most events. * At many mile markers volunteers called out the time, the average pace, and the projected finish time. This was appreciated. Some cons: * Aid stations were disorganized. Sometimes water at the first tables, sometimes Gu2O first, sometimes no Gu2O. Needs consistency. * As mentioned by another, cups were too small, so it was a challenge to get enough to drink at some aid stations. * Course was not scenic at all, but on the other hand, the streets were wide and provided plenty of room for all from start to finish. * Crowds were scarce and quiet. Only in a couple of spots were the crowds loud and supportive. Mostly they were quiet and seemingly looking to offer support only to the person(s) they knew. * Finish area needs some help. Too crowded with spectators, families, and support crews. Food was uninspired - cookies, Popsicles, cold beverage, or other relatively simple items would have been a big improvement over apples, bananas, relatively warm water, and lentil soup. The weather was excellent, although a little windy. The bus ride to the start at 5 a.m. was awfully early, but on a point-to-point course this wasn't unusual. Overall, I found CIM to be a well done event, but with a few areas of improvement, it could be outstanding. I'd recommend it particularly for an experienced marathon runner who is looking for a fast time - because all the essentials are there for a PR, but because of some of the organizational issues it might not be the optimal experience for a first-timer.
3.0

By: Eddie Hahn

Posted: December 07, 2007

Oriented towards the Faster Marathoner

The expo was well organized with a good representation of vendors and promotional booths for other major marathons. Plenty of free samples including Starbuck's hot chocolate with whipped cream, and a good variety of inspirational guest speakers. (I was inspired by the Dick Beardsley presentation.) Race number and chip pick up were smooth. The 25th anniversary edition goody sack included a nice, black, nylon, drawstring bag and a gray, all-weather, long-sleeve shirt. (I was a little surprised the date isn't listed on the shirt anywhere.) Everything about the race seems to be oriented on getting runners to finish peak performances. There are pace group leaders for every time segment from 3:10, 3:15, and in 15-minute increments up to 5 hours. The multicolor 25th race edition magazine as well as the website list qualifying times for Boston by sex and age group. The fan support along the route is amazing. I put the headphones on my iPod around my neck and didn't once bother or need to listen to it on course. There was plenty of entertainment from high school bands, to the Rocky Theme (miles 8 and 18), and a guy playing Chariots of Fire on a flute, as well as 80s classic rock. The course is (very) moderately rolling, and the second half is slightly hillier than the first. A special thanks to the US Army National guard soldiers and the City of Sacramento Police who guarded roads between miles 22 and 24. The post-race amenities were a little tricky to find - obscured from view about 150 meters from the finish line. They included orange slices, bagels, and PowerBars cut into very small units. I didn't consider the portions very generous - but then again the early entry fee for this event was very reasonable and low relative to others. As to the soup, Red Bull, coffee, etc., I sure didn't see any - but I finished in just under 5 hours. Once again, this event generally caters to the faster runner. The multi-colored giant ("coaster") medal displays the race's traditional logo.
4.0

By: Matt R.

Posted: December 06, 2007

Good race but finish area needs help

It was a great race overall, and I set a PR here. The start was organized and the rolling hills began immediately. The pace team was wonderful and I found that running 20 yards in front of him thinned out the pack. If I ran in the pace group, it was heel to heel. Water stations seemed to be really close mile to mile, then far. Very inconsistent. Next time I will wear a fuel belt. The volunteers were great as always. Bring your own Gu. Finish line was awful: I was dizzy and tired and surrounded by kids, families and random people. The post-run food booths were filled by non-runners eating breakfast by the handfuls. Not fair to those running longer. It is amazing how some saw this as "let's meet at the finish for bagels and soup." As said earlier by another poster, they need to fence off the finish area; it is too confusing and dangerous after running 26.2 miles to fight crowds and wait in line for water.
4.0

By: Bill M.

Posted: December 06, 2007

I'll be back

First time at CIM this year and enjoyed the entire experience. The course is fast as advertised. I think people read too much into the word "downhill" as I look through the other comments. Even with a net downhill course, you still need to run 26.2 miles! Changing gears through those small, rolling hills helped keep the legs feeling fresh. I will recommend this race to friends and I will be back next year.
5.0

By: Emily G.

Posted: December 05, 2007

Fast Course

This was my first marathon, and while my goal was to finish under 4 hours, I ended up with a Boston qualifying time of 3:33! The pacers and spectators were great motivators. My only complaints are the lack of Gu packs on the course (I'll bring my own next year) and the pillaging of the post-race food by non-runners. I witnessed two older local women filling up shopping bags with bagels and bananas. We eventually just left the area to get some food, but I would have loved to stay and enjoy the festivities. I definitely agree with the other comments that the finish area needs to be roped off.
5.0

By: Michelle S.

Posted: December 05, 2007

great first marathon

I had a great first-marathon experience at the CIM. The spectators were the best part. I finished in almost 5 hours and there were still people along the way cheering. There were little boys with giant bags of pretzels, people playing music, and even people offering cold beer. I agree with the comment below that there was not enough water or Gu in the tiny cups. My only other complaints are that the lines for the porta-potties along the course were way too long. I lost 5 minutes because I had to go. And I felt a little lost at the finish area. It was too crowded.
4.0

By: Jon C.

Posted: December 05, 2007

Just as it should be

Once again, CIM was just as expected. No hype, no 26-mile party, just an old-school runners' race. Organization was stellar. Buses to the start worked perfectly. There were tons of porta-potties, so the lines were nice and short. Gear check was right on as well. The long-sleeve tech shirt was very nice, and the finisher's medal was crazy big. Best of all, the weather was PERFECT. My only comments would be that some of those water stops were pretty tight. Perhaps a few more tables spread out over a little more space? Also, I agree there were way too many non runners enjoying the post race food. Warning: for who haven't been to CIM, yes, the course is fast, but it is far from flat. You best be prepared for 18+ miles of rolling hills. Thanks for another great race!
5.0

By: William Wittenauer

Posted: December 05, 2007

Fantastic Marathon

Just wanted to say that this was number 13 for me and I finally qualified for Boston (3:45:18). The 3:45 pace guy, Grant Carboni, was superb. He kept an eye out for my nutrition and hydration, which is usually my downfall, where I bonk! The hills were tackled by Grant in a way that they did not bother me at all, making them almost not noticeable. I did train for hills and that helps a lot. The organization had only one flaw that I noticed: at the end of the race, the food and drinks were out in the open crowd and I was not able to get anything as there were too many non-runners around. The food and drinks should be kept in the enclosed area. There should also be a family meet-up area with lettered signs posted like in Chicago. Overall, fantastic race that I will do again, but for now I have to get ready for Boston in April 2008!
4.0

By: Andy D.

Posted: December 05, 2007

Great course, great weather, great day!!

I have run several different marathons and I would put the California International at the top of my list. The organization of the race and the expo were great. The proximity of hotels, expo, finish line, and downtown made it to get where you needed to go. The bus service to the start line was an efficient way to get the runners to the start - and allowing the runners to stay on the bus until we were ready to warm up was great. The course was just as good as advertised - a little downhill stretch in the first 3-4 miles, rolling hills in the middle section, and then very flat from Mile 18 to the finish. A wonderful course for running a fast time. We had perfect running conditions, so I was pleased with achieving a PR by 5 minutes and qualifying for Boston. I would recommend this race to other runners looking for a fast course, a scenic route, and the opportunity to do your best.
5.0

By: Arsiyanti Ardie

Posted: December 05, 2007

Super Race & Organization, But Train for Hills!

This has got to be one of the best organized races ever, from online sign-up to the expo to the race itself. It absolutely caters to RUNNERS, and though it specifically targets BQers, I'm a 6-hour marathoner and felt very well taken care of. The only negative comment (really minor) is the long lines for the porta-pots at the beginning, but race organizers did say in every communication and all over the website to GET THERE EARLY. The course is hilly. Don't be dazzled by "fast." If you train on hills (and not just throwing a few in here or there, but TRAIN LONG on hills), then it will be fast. This year we also had a strong, cold headwind much of the way (since the race heads in the same direction most of the way). Dress warmly - you can always toss layers. Even though I'm very slow, there was outstanding course support, spectators and entertainment all along the way - and plenty of food left at the finish. The T-shirt is gorgeous - just MAKE SURE to check the correct size on your entry (they have separate women's and men's sizes, so take that into account). The medal is large, pretty, heavy, and with little rubber legs on the bottom makes a nifty beer coaster. Being very back-of-pack, I usually run alone, but there were LOTS of runners right around the 6-hour mark. The course is fairly pretty - mostly in suburban Sacramento, with lots of trees. The finish at the capitol is stunning.
5.0

By: apple m.

Posted: December 05, 2007

Great course, great spectators.

I had a great time running this marathon and it was truly very well-organized. If I had 1 complaint, it would have to be the bathrooms. Throughout the course there were very few bathrooms - only 2 or 3 every 5 miles or so. It was murder having to wait 3 miles to use the bathroom. And once you found them, there were often lines for them or they were being used. Not fun to have to wait in line during the race. Other than that, I think the marathon was well organized and an overall great experience. A bit of a crowd at the finish, though.
4.0

By: Jim M.

Posted: December 04, 2007

Very Well Organized Marathon

Compared to Las Vegas last year, this marathon was very well organized. It is obvious that a lot of work goes into this event. I really enjoy the spectators and we had nearly perfect weather. I plan to run this one every December from now on. I also like the shirt and finisher medal. This year I ran a p.r.
5.0

By: suzanne c.

Posted: December 04, 2007

Low key, nice course, but give me water, please.

I enjoyed running this marathon. The course was nice, the weather was perfect and the spectators were enthusiastic. The expo was a little confusing about where to pick up your stuff, but no big deal. My only real complaint is that once I crossed the finish line, I had to practically beg for water, and there was no food that I could find. When I crossed the finish line I was feeling a little light-headed and apparently walked passed the person handing out water. I made my way back and a guard stopped me about three feet before the water. I told him I needed some water and he wouldn't let me pass. He said I could have water only if I could get the attention of the person passing it out from where I was standing. I couldn't get her attention, so when he wasn't looking I walked up to her and asked her water. She said, "No" - because she thought I was coming back for more. I told her that I was thirsty and hadn't had any water and she apparently didn't believe me. After practically begging her, she grudgingly gave me a bottle of water, and it didn't look to me like that were even close to running out. I've run 9 other marathons, and this is the first time I didn't feel taken care of at the end. It is not good to deny water to a dehydrated runner!
3.0

By: John M.

Posted: December 04, 2007

Great race.

First time running CIM. The 3:00 pace guy was great. Nice course. Well organized. Would definitely come back.
5.0

By: Preston P.

Posted: December 04, 2007

My first CIM and I plan on coming back for more

I really enjoy point-to-point marathons - with the exception of the early morning bus ride, to me these are the best marathons. The course was great, and as the race progressed, the spectators were fantastic. The "downhill" course has many small hills. Many spectators would shout - "this is the last uphill for the race" - for us only to find another small hill. It still is a fast course - I improved my time from the SF marathon by over 30 minutes. The water stations were well stocked, the Clif pacers were great, and the music was motivating. Two small issues with organization: I think starting corrals should be added. I did a lot of weaving the first few miles. Second, and this has been mentioned before, the food area was swamped with non-runners getting food. I was a little frustrated by this. (Gotta love the family atmosphere and I was happy to see kids running up to their parents after they just finished the run, but I would like to have gotten a bite to eat a little faster.) All in all, a great race and I will be back next year.
4.0

By: David Saldivar

Posted: December 03, 2007

Excellent Event! Great Boston Qualifier!!

This was the second time I have done CIM, and, running with Tim T, I qualified for Boston! He was great. Only negative comment is that the finish area was overrun with kids, strollers, and anyone else who was in the neighborhood. They were taking food, blocking access and were a problem. Two runner friends of mine who finished in 3:46 did not get any soup or Red Bull, and had to stand in line for coffee with tons of non-runners. The finish area needs to be fenced off. Other than that, it was fantastic!!
5.0

By: Nima K.

Posted: December 03, 2007

nice race

This was my first marathon and it was a great one! The crowds and cheering really helped me during that tough 18-24 mile stretch. fun bands, DJs, a turkey, a 5th grader on his sax. great, community feel to the race. The rolling hills were definitely a bit more than I expected (and I train in SF), but overall really fun. Only drawback: I only saw Gu at one point during the race though, glad I carried my own. Buses were great; lines for the porta-potties were LONG though. I must say, I was a little intimidated since there are so many ultra runners and people qualifying for Boston, but I felt like I got plenty of support/crowds and I finished in 4:44, not a particularly fast time.
5.0

By: Frank E.

Posted: December 03, 2007

great race

It is a great race. Beautiful course, perfect weather, great crowds. They get better every year. And fast. Sure there are some tiny hills but nothing is really flat in California. And variety adds spice to life. This is my third CIM and the one with the best weather. 2005 was a bit too cold.
5.0

By: Paige M.

Posted: December 03, 2007

Tougher course than advertised!

The organization was pretty good, but no food in the end if you finished at 5:00 hours. This is always a problem for marathons - not enough left for the people on the course the longest. The 4:30 pacer went out way too fast and remained that way for a good part of the first half. I gave up following her after awhile. This was disappointing because I thought that they were the experts on pace. I won't follow a pacer again. Since this was my first marathon, it was important to be able to do all of the rolling hills (many more than adequately advertised) at the correct pace. I burned out my first half going too fast, following the pacer. The emphasis on this course is "fastest in the West." I would say that it is a tough course, with many rolling hills until mile 19. I ran in SF in October and I had a better time and a better understanding of the course. The fans were great and the view was pretty. Course was windy that day.
4.0

By: Robert A.

Posted: December 03, 2007

The CIM is a fantastic run!

It has been quite a few years since I ran a full marathon, so I ran the relay. I ran the 3rd leg of the race. People were pushing and shoving where I was waiting for my teammate. Turns out they weren't even running; they just wanted to see the runners. I still think this is a great run. One more thing: They ran out of relay medals.
4.0

By: Richard C.

Posted: December 03, 2007

Fantastic, Fast Course

Fantastic weather and a fantastic fast course. The rolling hills were small in my opinion, but I am from Pittsburgh and train on a lot of hills. My only problem was that this was the first marathon I had run with the GU sports drink. They had it in tiny little cups, which made it hard for the volunteers to hold the cup while leaving enough of the cup exposed for the runner to grab easily. I also found that many times when I grabbed a cup that it was only 1/4 to 1/2 full (about 2 oz. maybe). So my request would be for bigger cups with more liquid.
4.0

By: Hope R.

Posted: December 03, 2007

Harder than billed, but fun run.

After being just short of my Boston goal in San Diego, I really hoped to make it this time. But, I took off too fast and ended up dying with those seemingly endless rolling hills. The spectators were great - very encouraging - with great music along the way. Getting your gear at the expo was confusing and too time-consuming. The finish line was great, but no one directed you after you finished. They just told you to keep moving.
4.0

By: Will S.

Posted: December 02, 2007

Ow - My Legs!

This marathon is without a doubt downhill and you ought to do a lot of hill running before trying this one (or else your quads will be very tender). It is so downhill that you will see the downhill grade for 60% of the race. This makes for a fast race, which got me a PR and Boston qualifier after some pretty weak training (and not enough downhill runs). I'm hooked on Gu sports drink now. It goes down easy and doesn't make your hands sticky like Gatorade. After mile 15, though, it seemed really watered down and the volunteers (which rock) were mixing the cups (water in a Gu cup and vice versa). I ran on and off with Mike, the 3:10 pacer, and he was great. Good advice, encouragement, and knowledge of the course. The pacers didn't come out until about 5 minutes before the gun. Also, they ran solo for the entire race, so be ready to ditch your pacer if needed (the 3:30 guy finished around 3:50). I was hoping to see Arnold at mile 26, but not this year. I guess I will have to run it again. Volunteers were outstanding. One of the best and most organized runs that I have done.
5.0

By: Melisa C.

Posted: December 02, 2007

Beware of course time limit

Let me cut to the chase. I implore you to listen and take note. If you cannot do a marathon in 6 hours or under, do not - I repeat, do not - do CIM. This is a wonderful course, and a flawless organization. However, they mean 6 hours. Once the 6-hour pace group passes all the road blocks, the road blocks are taken down, the road opened to traffic and the runner becomes a pedestrian. Fair Oaks Blvd. is a dangerous thoroughfare. I fell behind the 6-hour group, fell behind the trucks picking up the course, and was a pedestrian from mile 16 on. I honestly don't know why I and many others were not pulled off the course; we should have been. I still PR'd, but it was well after the 6-hour cut off. I you insist on still doing this marathon, and if you are unable to complete in 6 hours, I urge you to carry hydration and nutrition. This is a fantastic marathon, but I will not do it again until I can run faster. I honestly thought I was going to be able to keep up the the wonderful 6-hour group, but I had a bad day.
4.0

By: Ryan O.

Posted: December 02, 2007

Where was the Gu at mile 13? Sports drink?

The rolling hills through the first half were fine. What wasn't fine, however, was the lack of any sports drink at the water stops. Every time I thought I took a Gu drink, it was just water. So, without the opportunity to get any calories from the drink I was looking forward to the Gu at mile 13. THERE WAS NO GU! Maybe there was later, but for the 2:35 pace people - NOTHING! Having no calories available on the course for us is dangerous, and it makes your last ten miles pretty painful. I did think the course was really nice; I just would have enjoyed it more if I weren't energy-deprived.
4.0

By: jellie bellie

Posted: October 15, 2007

Awesome 1st Marathon

I couldn't have asked for a better first marathon than this one! I was able to stay with the pace-setter for almost the entire race (3:45), but once I ran through the balloon "wall" at mile 20, I literally hit my wall. I was not ready for the pain and agony of the last six miles and finished in 3:54. Not too bad for my first-ever marathon! :) The aid stations were awesome, and the spectators were amazing. The best expo and tech shirts (although they were a bit big). Great course, with rolling hills. If hills are not your thing, maybe pick another race. I loved it though. The medals were absolutely beautiful! Overall, a wonderful experience. This is definitely not my last marathon! :) I will be back to CIM again!
5.0

By: sara h.

Posted: May 06, 2007

Yuck!

Okay, I'm a native Sacramentan, so maybe I have a different perspective, but I'll try to be impartial. The course: way more hilly that billed. And I liked Big Sur! But there was a lot of straight stretches when all you could was a hill of people. I guess that was my big problem - not enough twists and turns. I am a small and ended up with a shirt that, although labeled a Medium, is way too large, they were out of smalls. Why do races always run out of smalls? The 4:30 pacer was way too fast for the first half. If straight and hilly is your cup of tea, go for it.
3.0

By: Donald C.

Posted: May 02, 2007

Very Nice Race

Make sure to check out the elevation chart. It is a fast course with a net downhill (which allowed me to take 30 min off my PR and qualify for Boston), but there are "rolling hills," which upset many unsuspecting runners. If you prepare for them during your training, you'll be fine. I felt that there was a large contingent of Boston qualifying hopefuls and this is the group that the race organizers focused upon. The pacers were great, and the website is informative. Also, the expo is surprisingly good for a medium-sized marathon.
4.0

By: Mary L.

Posted: January 17, 2007

Not for the slower runner

This was my first marathon so I can only compare it to my experience at several half marathons and shorter races. The spectators were great, but if you were running with the goal of just finishing under 6 hours, there was little support on the course. The trucks picking up the mile markers and tables were constantly cutting us off and nearly hit me at one point. It was also very disappointing to finally cross the finish line of my first marathon and have no refreshments or a medal. They were taking everything down even though I finished under 6 hours. I will run this again, but only when I know I can finish well ahead of the truck. I can say that the CIM website provided very useful information and the Board does a great job of putting together a great event. If you are a slow runner, I would stick to marathons with a longer cut-off or no cut-off.
4.0

By: Lucinda C.

Posted: January 12, 2007

Great course, great weather, and great pacers.

I couldn't have wished for a better marathon other than a better time, which was my own doing. The pacers were a lifesaver and a huge confidence-builder for running a race I'd come from out of the state to do. The size of the race was another plus. I never felt crowded except during the first half-mile.
4.0

By: Sunnie G.

Posted: December 26, 2006

Loved it! I qualified for Boston!

I selected to run the CIM for two reasons: to qualify for Boston and to visit good friends who live in Sacramento. Training in Boulder at altitude and running lots of hills allowed me to take advantage of sea level and "easily" tackle the CIM rolling hills. I drove the course and paid attention to the "rolling hills." I reviewed the elevation map offered on the site. At the expo lecture series, I attended Dr. Steve Polansky's lecture on "How to run each mile of the CIM." Information shared by Steve was invaluable and humorous. I applied 3 pieces of advice: wear a trash bag to keep warm at the start line; take a Tylenol before the race and carry (and took) another Tylenol during the race when the pain of cramps started; I agreed with his assessment of the hills that, except for two, were not noticeable. Steve was right on all accounts. They all helped me to run the CIM. Weather on race day was perfect running weather. People complained that it was cold at the start at 33 degrees. Cold is relative. I was used to 20 degrees in Boulder, so 33 degrees to me is warm. I wore shorts, a sleeveless wick-dry shirt underneath an old wick-dry 3/4 sleeve, and a baseball cap. I also wore a bandana around my neck for the first 6 miles. The pacing groups allowed me to meet runners who run my pace and who are trying to qualify for Boston. I started with Grant in the 3:45 group. This group ran the current pace in the first half and gained on Tim's 3:50 group in the second half of the marathon. I read the bio on Tim and later an article on him in December's Runner's World. His marathon PR is under 3:00 and he is an ultramarathoner. Tim ran too fast a pace in the first half and I am glad that I did not join his group. The spectators lined the majority of the course. The crowd was at its fullest at the switch off points for the relay. It was great to have a cheering crowd throughout the majority of the race. The cheering definitely was encouraging, especially my friends who came out to cheered me around Mile 22. Finishing at the capitol was very nice except for the horseshoe turns to the finish line. A bonus would have been to see Arnold and Maria waving to the runners and crowd at the capitol steps. The finisher's medal is very colorful. The volunteers at the water stations were very quick with handing water especially when I had to grab 3 cups to fill my 10 oz. bottles. The volunteers did a great job sorting out the sweat bags by bib numbers and efficient in finding mine and handing it to me with a smile. The post-race refreshments were okay. The soup needed more salt. Everything about the CIM race was fantastic except for the iron-on logo on the long-sleeve technical shirt. The logo peeled off after the first washing. No female sizes were available.
5.0

By: John Unrau

Posted: December 16, 2006

More Hilly Than Expected

This was a great marathon. The weather was great; the organization was great. One point I would like to make is that where you train is probably important in whether or not you think this course is "hilly." Most people who run this probably train around San Fran, which is HILLY. I am from Ottawa, Canada - a flat place - and therefore, the "rolling hills" seemed mountainous to me and had sapped my legs much earlier than I anticipated. If you are from the east and train in flat conditions, be wary of this course's reputation as "fast."
4.0

By: Rakhi N.

Posted: December 12, 2006

Good first marathon

This was my first marathon. The description of the course is misleading - it should be "rolling hills" rather than "downhill." Correct description will help first-timers to better pace themselves. The volunteers/spectators keep you going. They were awesome. Post-race organization was below average: There were no water bottles, so I had to wait for a gentleman to fill up little glasses. I did not find any sports drinks/bars/soup at the finish line either. There were only some slices of bananas and oranges. My time was 4:55, so I doubt if +5-hour finishers got anything much.
4.0

By: Jim H.

Posted: December 11, 2006

Perfect!

Clear sunny day, an amazing course and outstanding organization. Couldn't have been better. The hills were gently rolling and not the heavily corrugated ups and downs of the marathons I've run in the Pacific Northwest. And (bonus!) they were always followed by long gentle declines that seemed to melt into the horizon. My overall impression was for every one up, you got two downs in return, no doubt because of the net elevation drop. I found the combination of small communities and rural scenes along the route highly enjoyable and relaxing (if you can use that word to describe running a marathon). Certainly I didn't notice any tacky areas that seem to accompany some courses. Finishing at the capitol building was a touch of class, as were the volunteers who retrieved my sweats bag, the tomato soup and the Starbucks gingerbread lattes. My only suggestion would be to chuck the (really dry) bagels. Thanks, CIM, for a great experience. I would love to come back again.
5.0

By: Renee Harrington

Posted: December 11, 2006

You should run this marathon!!!!

This was a really great marathon to do! I decided to run it since I heard it was a fast course and I wanted to qualify for Boston (which I did do!). So that being said, you can run a fast time on this course. Just be well aware of the course. Yes, it is a net downhill but it is a very rolly net downhill. Pace well and be aware of the middle miles and you'll be set for a strong finish during the last 6 essentially flat miles. Other pluses to this race are great weather, taking the bus to the start was easy and made things less stressful, aid stations were very well spaced and easy to negotiate through, great spectators throughout the course (offering water, fruit, encouragement, and even beer), with planning you can have family/friends meet you many times along the course (my boyfriend was able to see me at the start, miles 7.5, 13, 20 and the finish), the separate finish for male and female was pretty cool (I was confused about this at first but in the end I felt special, it was much less crowded, and the photographer was able to get a finish picture of me without a stranger's arm or leg in the way), massages at the finish (!!!!), there was plenty of post-race food, etc. So for negatives, I can't really think of much. A lot of people gripe about small details but just remember much of that has to do about how they felt during the race and how they did. This marathon gave me everything I was looking for: a fun and enjoyable race, great town and people, a Boston qualifying time, and memories. Put this one on your list to do! Oh, also wanted to mention that we ended up staying at a hotel called Inn Off Capitol Park. It was a very nice and reasonably-priced hotel that was within walking distance of the expo and the finish line, and it gave us a very late checkout (2 p.m.).
5.0

By: Michael D.

Posted: December 08, 2006

It's Okay

The course is mostly on the highway that runs parallel to the American River and is pretty wide and lined with oak trees. The race is fast, but the rolling hills mean that it's not as fast as many say. All in all, it is a nice course. Spectators lined the streets and welcome runners at every small community and almost every intersection... really friendly and supportive. Lines at the starting line porta-potties were astronomical. The electrolyte drink was awful. The post-race food was adequate, but not anything special. Aid stations were poorly marked and none had Tylenol. The medal is really nice. The staff at the finish line was friendly and helpful. It's the people that make this race fun.
4.0

By: casey c.

Posted: December 08, 2006

Outstanding event

The course is downhill overall, but the first half is MUCH harder on the body than a relative novice like me was really ready for. The hills are set up to really pound your legs - be prepared! This tour of Sacramento is well-organized, well-laid out, attracts some very friendly runners, has a perfect staging area in Folsom and an inspiring ending at the state capitol (though the split-gender finish area seems pointless and confused the people who finished right in front of me... but I digress). I will definitely be back to run this again - my compliments to all involved in the 2006 CIM!
5.0

By: David G.

Posted: December 07, 2006

A very fine marathon.

This was my second marathon after San Francisco and I was impressed. The course follows suburban and urban streets that offer a few ups and downs and little scenery. I ran 45 minutes faster here than San Francisco. The crowds and entertainment were almost overwhelmingly good. The marathon was a good size and well run.
4.0

By: Troy Rambo

Posted: December 07, 2006

Not bad!

This was marathon #8 for me and the first CIM. Overall I don't think you could ask for a better day! I know the organizers had nothing to do with it but man... gorgeous! Expo: Small but easy to navigate and plenty of places to buy stuff. Good location also. Shuttle Service: This is a point-to-point race. The organization of the shuttle service was fantastic. It was easy on and off. They even let us stay on the buses to stay warm before the race. I can't imagine another marathon event that could do better than they did. Kudos!! Race: I was expecting much of the course to be downhill, but it was far more rolling than I expected. It definitely doesn't make it a bad thing, but I was surprised. Despite the rolling, the race was fast and probably could be the fastest course in the West (even for a turtle like me!!). The spectators were very supportive and there were more than I thought there would be on the course. The actual course wasn't bad but I'd probably have preferred to turn right or left a little more. I believe we were on Fair Oaks Blvd. for 15 or so miles with not much turning. Finishing: This is my only real complaint with the race. Nobody would help me with my chip removal so I had to do it myself. Not a huge deal except right after the race, I really didn't want to sit down until I had a chance to stretch a bit. Also, the corral had no refreshments and it was a free for all with spectators outside of it. For me (a 5:20 finisher) I was unable to have any food or drink at the finish since there wasn't any I could find. There may have been some available but nobody was there to help me. It was far different than what I was expecting since most races have the stuff right at the finish. Additionally, having someone who could give directions back to the host hotel would have been nice. All in all, I'd recommend the race as the good far far outweighs the bad. I probably won't do it again since there are so many others to do but if you want a great California race, this one could be for you!
4.0

By: Gregory C.

Posted: December 06, 2006

Some very good reasons to do this one.

I love reading these marathon reviews. It's so interesting to discover what different people expect from marathon organizers. Here's my take: Start with the website. I thought the "Runner Info" page was well organized and contained a lot of good information - even some "runner's etiquette" suggestions. Their website asked the fast runners to be sure and leave some food for the later arrivals. To their credit, apparently the faster runners were able to resist the culinary temptations of boxes and boxes of bananas and bagels. So maybe the earlier arrivals found something more than dried-out bagels and under-ripe bananas. But hey, I don't run to the finish for the cuisine. Post-run food: minimally adequate. (But if they had better to offer, they should know to put it out as runners come in, not as the food disappears.) Hear me loud and clear, marathon organizers: NO HOSE WATER. There was one water stop that had the cheap stuff. The rest were fine, and all had enthusiastic staff. And the staff wore plastic gloves (so no finger water at the CIM). It seemed like there was one leg of 3 or 4 miles with no restrooms (about mile 10), but can't swear to it. Otherwise, restrooms were good and lines often short. Note for next year's etiquette page: Line up for the potty parallel to the course, not across it! (Perhaps this is a popular course for first-timers?) Prettiest finisher's medal I've got. Nice work. And from the "We'd like to thank the participants for their donations" column: not without humor, either. The obverse has the name of the sponsor, "Organs 'R' Us." (After a guy died in the SF Marathon I ran last July, this couldn't pass unnoticed.) Maybe next year they can add their phone number for a speedy pick up? Cool "Technical T" and we had a choice at registration of long- or short-sleeve. I chose the long-sleeve and for the first time I actually wore the shirt they gave me for the marathon. It's the first one I've got that looks nice on me. Like the medal - nice work people. Bus to the start ($10 at registration) worked well, as did the sweats bag pick up and delivery. I suggest you use the sweats bag opportunity; it's cold at the start. Excellent running weather in 2006. Clear and cool. I felt fine in shorts and their long-sleeve T, and I was glad to easily get my sweats back at the finish to warm up. My GPS watch agrees with the CIM: They say you start at 366 feet, and finish at 26 feet above sea level. My watch says I climbed 3,907 feet, and descended 4,248. But what others say is true - gentle rolling hills. I didn't see them as a factor. A special mention of the belly dancers about mile 24, on both sides of the course. Thank you, ladies. I needed a smile about then. This was my fourth marathon, and while I'll do more, I'm not focused on repeating venues just yet. But when I do, I'll be back!
4.0

By: Esther W.

Posted: December 05, 2006

Great Marathon, but Not Easy!

This was my 18th marathon, and first CIM. The weather was cold but perfect for running. I don't know where people get the idea of a "fast" course from. Although it is a negative elevation gain, it was rolling hills the whole way, and I found this course to be one of my more difficult runs (and no training didn't help matters, either). The water stops with the volunteers were wonderful and the crowd support great. Having wide open streets with fall colors was nice. Overall, it was an enjoyable marathon (if you can call any marathon enjoyable)! Definitely worth doing once.
5.0

By: Steven Kramer

Posted: December 04, 2006

Great Race Day

This is my 15th marathon and my first here. The route is great on the legs and the spectators were teriffic. Passing through the small towns reminded me of Boston! Some good food at he finish would be my only suggestion.
5.0

By: Tessa L.

Posted: December 04, 2006

Good marathon, but could use some fine tuning

Expo is well organized and convenient. Packet pickup was fairly easy, though it was confusing to have to leave the expo to get shirts and goody bags and then return to continue shopping. Bus pick-up was smooth and fast. Glad the buses were at all the listed hotels. Start line was fairly well planned, and though the porta-potty lines were long (as usual), it was nice to be able to wait on the buses (though the lungfuls of exhaust were not nice). Good course. I have to say the 5:30 pacer meant well but was incompetent. We went out in a sub-12 minute pace and the pace should have been 12:36. At 3 miles we were at 35 minutes and I dropped back, knowing I'd already gone out too fast. Course is nice and rolling, though I wish it were on the river parkway rather than on Fair Oaks Blvd. Finish line was NOT good. They ran out of medals again. I walked a mile back from the hotel to find out that they'd been out of medals for awhile and hadn't told us. It's not a big deal for me, as this was my 17th marathon, but for the first-time completers, I'm sure it was a big disappointment. I'll probably be back, but I won't trust a pacer again for a while. Again, not such a big deal for an experienced marathoner, but going out at that pace could be disastrous for a first-time racer.
3.0

By: Ralph G.

Posted: December 04, 2006

Perfect run on a perfect day

After running away from the CIM weather reputation to various southern marathons for the last three years, I ran the local CIM for the first time this year and it was a perfect run on a perfect weather day. Temperatures in the low 40's at the start with no wind or clouds led to ideal conditions. Smashed my PR by 9 minutes running with one of MANY pace groups. The course has rollers throughout the first half, but that keeps the legs fresh and none of the climbs are of any significance. Crowd support not on par with the big boys, but there were loud pockets of support scattered through the course and in particular at the relay exchanges. Great design made for a beautiful finisher's medal. Separate finish lines for men and women are a nice touch too. Finish line was well organized with massages, hot soup, food, and sweats all available within yards of the finish.
5.0

By: Hyung C.

Posted: December 04, 2006

Rolling Hills, Flat Finish

Net downhill course has quite a few rolling hills for the first 2/3 of the course, but none are that steep or long. After a short hill, it was encouraging to see long stretches of declines. Most of my training was done on completely flat terrain, so my quads did get quite tired and sore during the marathon. Cold (32F) at the start, but the sun warmed things up throughout the day to about 55F. Bus ride to start was well organized and is must for all runners. Bit more crowded throughout run than expected - didn't really thin out till mile 14/15. Wish the water stations were closer to mile markers, but at least they were plentiful. The small towns and scenery were nice. And spectators were great - best of the three marathons that I have run (LA, SF, CIM). Finish was really well done, and the spectators lining the way into the capitol building were energetic. Bag pick-up and food locations were a little hard to find. But food at finish line was good: Clif Bars/recovery drinks, two kinds of soup (lentil and tomato), apples, bananas, bagels, and Starbucks Gingerbread Lattes. Good course to run for a fast time. Was hoping to finish in 3:30, but instead finished in 3:43. Still lowered my PR by 40 minutes.
4.0

By: Jonathan Bischke

Posted: December 04, 2006

Highly enjoyable race

My brother and I completed the California International Marathon yesterday and highly enjoyed the experience. The weather was beautiful, the fans were enthusiastic and the course was interesting. It's definitely a course that you can run a fast time on, especially if you don't mind rolling hills. The only things that could be improved for the race would be a few more porta-potties at the start (lines were pretty long and resulted in us starting a few minutes after the gun went off) and better food at the finish (loved the tomato soup but there wasn't much else to enjoy). Otherwise, everything about the race was good and I'd definitely recommend it to anyone interested in running a small but enjoyable marathon.
5.0

By: Min-gyu Clark Kim

Posted: February 06, 2006

Fantastic

This was my very first marathon in my life and I just loved it. This marathon actually inspired me to become a better runner and since this event, I have been training intensively. The course was mostly downhill and very scenic. What surprised me was the spectators and volunteers. They were there to cheer you in that early chilly morning. I really thank their effort in spite of weekend morning sleepover. As for the organization, I can't really compare with others yet, because this was my first marathon. However, there were plenty of water stations and porta-potties and so forth. And yeah, the medal at the finish line was beautiful. Well, overall I loved it and yes, I am running next year - with intensive preparation to make the Boston Marathon!
5.0

By: RJ Lott

Posted: January 26, 2006

Marathon is set up for a fast time!

Definitely do this race for a very quick time! There is plenty of room to run on the wide streets and the frequent aid stations and spectators will keep you going! Just be careful of the weather. It can be quite cool at the start (near freezing). The days leading up to the race in 2006 were quite cold, rainy and windy! Also watch out for the fast start. It would be very wise to stick with one of the excellent pacers the entire route.
4.0

By: k a m.

Posted: January 04, 2006

Good race but not great

This was my third run of CIM and admittedly a mistake was made on my part - promised to help a slower run acheive a PR. That said, there seems to be an attitude of "if you ain't fast - you ain't nothing" by many race organizers, not limited to CIM. Pacing to finish at 5:45 found that many of the water stations were closed well before the cut-off (many volunteers were apologizing), the trucks picking up equipment were darting in and around runners - and worst of all - there was very, very little support at the finish and no medals. The reason given? "More people than expected." Oh my gosh! How, after 24 years of putting on a race, can you run short of medals? We did receive in the mail a medal only three weeks later - that was impressive and responsive - but this race is going to be in trouble when folks catch on to the Sac Cowtown Marathon held the first weekend of October when the weather is more predictable.
3.0

By: Kerry B.

Posted: January 04, 2006

Perfect Boston Qualifier

This was my fourth marathon, and my goal was to qualify for Boston. I ran with the 3:15 pace group to meet my required time. The pace group was excellent; we were within 2-3 seconds of our pace at every mile for most of the race and ran a slightly negative split. Chip time 3:13:58, gun time 3:14:20 - 30 minutes faster than my best time. Weather worked out perfectly; cool/cold at the start (mid-30s) and warming up slightly (42); no wind. Fast point-to-point course with some small/short rolling hills.
4.0

By: Jenny A.

Posted: December 19, 2005

Great first marathon!

I ran the 2005 CIM. It was my first marathon & a fabulous experience. The course is wonderful, spectators encouraging and good support. I am planning to run it again in 2006.
5.0

By: Doerte Mahanay

Posted: December 19, 2005

My First Marathon - Exceeded Expectations!

This was my first marathon. We flew in from Seattle for this race because of: a) reliable weather; b) nice & easy rolling hills, leveling off to flat at the last third of the race; c) excellent support and cheering along the entire way; d) pretty scenery; e) great organization and enough water & gel along the route; f) lots of entertaining bands and music (especially those guys playing the Ramones). All my expectations were exceeded tremendously. The race was enjoyable from start to finish. Everything fell into place perfectly. The only items that could be slightly improved are: a) more burners for the tomato soup at the end. After waiting for 15 minutes post-race, we had to give up since we could not stand around any longer; b) better t-shirt design. Hey, how about brighter colors and a logo that does not look so small and coded? I don't think I could have picked a better first marathon. Even my time was better than expected. Looking forward to the next one!
5.0

By: Joseph A.

Posted: December 10, 2005

Excellent Race!! Very Well Organized!!!

Very well organized and executed. There were about 4000 runners, which is a comfortable number for space on the road. I drove the course the Thursday before, and the weather was totally miserable, with cold rain and wind. However, on race-day Sunday, it was clear with no wind - but cold (freezing at the start). But it seemed to warm up quickly once the sun is up. Go to Dr. Polansky's presentation about the marathon course at the expo. It is very interesting and will answer any questions you have about this marathon. At the start, there is a new gas station/store to stay warm in while waiting for the start. The Clif-Bar pace teams are the way to go if you are planning on a specific time, or just to keep from going out too fast. The 3:30 pacer was amazing!! He was right on the dot, every mile!! This is a great race. But you may be taking a chance on the weather.
4.0

By: Jon C.

Posted: December 10, 2005

Go to CIM to run fast!

This is a real runner's race with a nice feel to it. Organization was great, low-key expo was easy to get in and out of. Buses to the start and getting sweat bags back worked perfectly. There were tons of porta-potties. Start was cold (for us So. Cal. types), but it was pretty good weather for Sac. in early December. Course was just as advertised: Rolling start with more downs than ups. There were some patches of good crowd support from the locals along the way. Great finish right in front of the Capitol. Nice medal and pretty good post-race food.
5.0

By: Jaime A.

Posted: December 09, 2005

uber fast course - no better place for PR

I was shooting for a time under 3:00:00 and finished in 2:55 and change. Loved the pace callers at every mile - definitely helped me get my goal time. Perfect combo of slight inclines and declines. The sports drink was terrible - why doesn't everyone just use Gatorade??
4.0

By: Lisa H.

Posted: December 09, 2005

Overall decline, yes. BUT nothing is easy.

We picked the Sacramento Marathon because of the course description - overall decline and fast. However, the hills were 'rolling' and seemingly continous. Yes they finally faded away in the last 5-6 miles. Yes, I did my hills (trail running in the Rockies) and in fact took 21 minutes off of my PB. Regardless, I did not find this to be an 'easy' course and the first half can definitely wear your down. But then again, marathons just aren't easy are they? The best thing for me was that I could "breathe." At basically 0-300 feet elevation and lower humidity, breathing was much easier (I have asthma) - and no, you don't get drunk on oxygen. :) The overall organization of this race was EXCELLENT! 1. From the race expo, to the closed course, to the buses, etc. These directors run a tip-top organization. 2. Kudos to the pacers who did a great job. It was nice to meet and greet the pacers at the expo and ask questions. If you practice 10 and 1's, be prepared to tweak your system or be self sufficient as the pacers here run non-stop. 3. Split times are called at every mile - a very nice feature especially if you have a goal time in mind. 4. The volunteers! Oh my gosh, what can I say? Thank you - each and every one of you - you made the runners feel very welcome. You were brilliant. 5. The weather - perfect running weather. You couldn't ask for a better day - even at the start. 6. My only disappointment was in the after-race amenities. You had to walk through the crowds in order to find water. Maybe move the water to the finish line? Nor did we find any free coffee. That being said, the location for the race finish soon took away any disappointment.
4.0

By: Darcy O.

Posted: December 09, 2005

Great course, good mileage markers and timers.

From Eastern Washington. Great race! My first full. Great fans, great support, I loved having the mileage posted every mile! And the time callers were very helpful! Thanks! Had a great time.
5.0

By: G. R. M.

Posted: December 09, 2005

An excellent marathon

The first three quarters are gently rolling with no grades so steep that they take you out of your rhythm and no declines so steep that they eat you up, unless you attack them too aggressively. There's more down than up but the variety in terrain provides some relief to the legs. Those going out easy will be rewarded the last six or seven miles, which are flat on wide tree-lined streets approaching the Capitol. Because of the cold most runners wore sleeved shirts, gloves and a hat at the beginning and then gradually peeled them off as the race progressed. The busses, start, water tables and finish were well organized and the crowd support was good with lots of friendly neighbors coming out to their front yards in the cold to cheer the runners. Some of the big intersections were packed with spectators. The actual course in my view deserves a 5, but since the score inludes scenery it must be compared to Big Sur or Avenue of the Giants which are spectacular. But hey, no race has everything. This is an excellent marathon and the organizers and locals deserve a lot of credit.
4.0

By: Diane P.

Posted: December 07, 2005

First-time marathoner - had a great time.

I enjoyed the course. The weather turned out beautiful. The restrooms were a bottleneck on the course; I lost 5 minutes in lines. I really enjoyed the event overall. I hope to do it again.
5.0

By: Cynthia W.

Posted: December 05, 2005

Great organization, friendly folks, and it IS down

Enjoy the slope of this course.... The inclines were quickly over and the declines stretched forever. The prettiest part is the last 6 miles in downtown Sacramento; earlier it's mostly suburban sprawl but views of more downhill to come make it worth doing once. Organization was great and crowds offered encouragement, oranges, pretzels, and Oreos, which was useful because the sports drink was the most diluted I've ever been sustained on. Great time calling throughout the race.
4.0

By: Mary Bradley

Posted: December 05, 2005

exciting

I was a back-up in the relay and knew about it on Friday. I ran the first leg of the race 6 miles up and down hills. I was very nervous and had an exciting time. Never had run in a marathon before. It was a blast!!
5.0

By: Frank E.

Posted: December 04, 2005

Great mid-size marathon

This is a great marathon. A bit chilly at the start (around freezing this time of year) but warms up nicely and good temperature overall. Organization was very solid, enthusiastic aid station workers, nice expo, good crowds, esp. near the end. Also lots of music and fun. Food after is so-so though, good thing Clif was there and Starbucks with free samples. But otherwise, nice course, rolling hills for first 16 miles, then smooth downhill to finish. Roads are totally blocked off, plenty of space, good pace runners, etc. Really worth looking into. Kudos to organizers.
4.0

By: Megan S.

Posted: December 04, 2005

FAST course, great race overall!

Pros: Smokin' fast course, spectators were great and excited for a small marathon, ideal weather, buses were coordinated. Terrain was fast with a net downhill and small hills in the beginning, maybe a little boring at times running by strip malls, but the finish at the Capitol was amazing! Cons: The early water stops were very crowded and I had to grab own water from the table, and the host hotel put up a fight over a late checkout.
4.0

By: Richard O.

Posted: December 04, 2005

OK course, post-race organization needs help

The course wasn't as fast as advertised; the rolling hills through the first 18 don't feel like they're downhill (at least they didn't to me). Pre-race organization is on the money, as were the on-course directions, aid stations and split times (just about every mile called split times). Post-race was mayhem.... Spectators mixed with finishers and no one seeming in charge. It took several attempts to find the water and post-race snacks. I ended up playing director for numerous folks showing where sweats pickup was, etc. Lots of non-racers mingling and getting in the way. Very cold at the start (7 am) and then it warmed up about 8, and I regretted wearing tights and a second shirt. Might consider starting at 8 instead of 7.... Would make deciding what to wear much easier. Lots of music and friendly folks on the course, and the aid station folks were wonderful.... Always yelling out 'sports drink here, water ahead...' or vice versa.
4.0

By: Anthony C.

Posted: May 05, 2005

Fair/Fast Course

If you are looking for a fast marathon, this is up there (not as fast as Chicago, but close). Gentle rolling hills the first 16-18 miles and then flattens out. Recommend it for competitive marathoner or a first-time marathoner. Only reason to fly across the country is to run fast. Expo below average, spectators average, post-race food below average, and logistics above average (organized). Good Boston qualifier or Olympic trial qualifier.
4.0

By: Satish S.

Posted: January 02, 2005

A fair running experience

A decent early winter race. A net downhill course with a good number of rolling hills, so it isn't quite as easy as the organizers make it out to be. The expo was average. The start was well organized with plenty of portapotties, especially if you caught the early busses. It was cool waiting around for the start, but fortunately, the forecasted rain did not materialize. Temperature warmed up quickly as the race progressed. And the spectators started showing up as the day wore on. Good aid stations but a little short so if you did not get a drink quickly you could be out of the station before you realized it. Kudos to the volunteers for their enthusiasm. Pace info at the mile markers was very useful. Apart from the soup, the food at the finish was definitely uninteresting. Dry bagels, no cream cheese! But a nice colorful medal. Downtown Sacramento is eminently forgettable. Not exciting enough a race to warrant a return. There are many more places to visit and run at.
4.0

By: Scott H.

Posted: December 31, 2004

Very enjoyable race!

This is a great course for serious runners and had great spectators and scenery. The mile markers were excellent (huge!) with officials at every one. The course wound through some rural areas and then through the very nice well-wooded downtown area. Spectators were everywhere, along with some bands and cheerleaders. Aid stations were frequent and well-staffed. A great race for my first marathon! A knee injury doomed my 3:40 pace at the 22-mile mark, but I still struggled to a 3:59 finish.
5.0

By: Lulu M.

Posted: December 14, 2004

Too many hills and not enough scenery

This is a great course for serious runners, but if you're into spectators and scenery, this is not the course for you. I found the course to be very boring. This year runners in the 5:30-6:00 hour range had no mile markers. The markers were removed before the cut-off. Very disappointing. Like to hitchhike? The shuttle busses were very late, causing most runners to hitch a ride. On the bright side, the medal was very colorful and well worth it.
2.0

By: David H.

Posted: December 11, 2004

Well-managed, friendly marathon

I'll keep it quick. Ran this to get my Boston qualifier. Mission accomplished. Race was well-managed, incredibly friendly people, aid stations out the whazoo, good expo before hand. Course was nice, rolling hills first 15 miles, then flat-to-downhill to finish. Like the point-to-point race, more scenery and I'd have given it 5 stars. Spectators are thin, but very enthusiastic - cheer for everybody, not just friends and family. I like the field size - elbow room without feeling isolated on the course. Again - very friendly.
4.0

By: Janet O.

Posted: December 10, 2004

Simply, a road race.

Hilly and fast with a great hometown feel. This race will cater to the serious runner or 1st-timer just as long as you don't require the 30,000-people hoopla.
5.0

By: Jonathan R.

Posted: December 06, 2004

Just the right size race

I ran CIM yesterday and we had a perfect day: temps. in the 40's and sunny after predictions of rain. The first 15 miles is pretty rolling, not too flat and more down than up. My quads didn't revolt until mile 16. Downhill courses are always tougher than advertised for me. I prefer flatter courses or trails where the downhills are cushioned by the dirt. Support was great, lots of volunteers at the water stops. Just enough cheering spectators to keep you going. Clif Shot pace teams for company. I ran with the 3:30 group led by famous ultra runner Tim Twietmeyer. If you havne't heard of him, do a Google search. We started out with about 100 runners in the group and worked down to 15 at mile 22 when I ran ahead. Tim was great and did a nice job of pacing. The host hotel was affordable and convenient. My room was only $140 and the expo was next door. The expo was small compared to L.A. and N.Y. and not too interesting to me. Same old stuff on sale. But, I didn't fly up to Sac. to go shopping; I flew up to race. It was great to have room to breathe at the finish after the experience I had at my first 2 marathons (NY and L.A.). I found everything very well run and organized. They even offered to let us sit on the bus at the start to stay warm. They serve Campbells tomato soup at the finish and it hit the spot. I qualified for the 2006 Boston Marathon when I'll be 45 and had a great weekend. It may take me the rest of the week before I can walk without my cane. :)
4.0

By: Ben G.

Posted: December 06, 2004

great race

Well organized. For a small city, this was a great race. Crowd support was super but not too many spectators. I've ran on other cities where the residents did not care at all even if the course was on residential streets. One negative comment is that there was no coffee, water or bread at the start. It was real cold that it's better to stay in the bus until a few minutes before the start. Downtown Sacramento on a Saturday night was also very quiet. At 6pm, only the mall was open for business. You can even count the number of people. Overall, I consider running this race again.
4.0

By: Bill Strachan

Posted: December 06, 2004

THE BEST MARATHON in western US in December!

As a veteran of over 50 marathons (PR 2:22) & a coach of marathon runners for over 30 years; I regard this as the BEST MARATHON RACE in the United States for SERIOUS RUNNERS! The course affords challenge & the opportunity for FAST TIMES but WITHOUT the trauma to the legs of traditional downhill courses. If I want a December marathon for my runners to use as a qualifier for the TRIALS, BOSTON or just a PR - THIS IS IT! Bill Strachan - Head Coach - AZTECH Racing Team - Phoenix, AZ.
5.0

By: DeeAnna Whitman

Posted: November 08, 2004

The CIM is the most supportive I have ever run.

This course has everything a marathon should have. Scenery, hills, excitement, music on almost every corner, and the greatest supportive onlookers I have ever encountered. Even the children got involved!
5.0

By: Thomas J.

Posted: March 03, 2004

A real runner's marathon

This race isn't catering to armies of walkers or the 15 min/mile tourist. It's a footrace, and a great one. Efficient organization, but can we please have some real food at the finish - or at least infuse some moisture into the bagels? The course is hyped as fast. Well, it's OK but the 'rolling' hills the first 16 miles are a little bigger than you're led to believe. The up side is when it flattens out, it'll feel easier and you can really pick it up. The roads are wonderfully wide and smooth. Btw, the split timers aren't great at math, so do your own pace calculations at the mile markers. The crowds aren't huge but surprisingly big for such a thinly populated course. Never seen so many bible verses on banners, but what counts is their enthusiasm and it's topnotch. Bottom line: if you're a real runner this is an excellent race. If you're trying to get to Boston, even better. But real runners want healthy food before the race and that's hard to come by in Sacramento restaurants.
4.0

By: Tom M.

Posted: January 19, 2004

What about the train?

It was a fine race... the weather cleared up, the point-to-point course was great, the crowds were wonderful and the aid sations were just peachy... but an unexpected train stopped runners at about mile 23 for a few minutes. Ouch (I just got by the gates). They promise it won't happen again, but the race seems to be managed by local civic boosters rather than runners. No pasta feed the night before and poor post-race food goodies were, I guess, attempts to fill the local restaurants.
4.0

By: Todd L.

Posted: December 12, 2003

Good Course, Good Organization, And Good Crowd

This was my first marathon and liked what the CIM course had to offer. The hills in the first 12 miles of the course made for a good balance between the flat and downhill portions of the course. The weather was great, spectators were very supportive, and the organization was alright. The field of faster runners was better then most marathons I think. I hope to run this marathon again in the future.
4.0

By: Tessa L.

Posted: December 10, 2003

Not flat, fair course

Course may have a net drop, but it swoops and rolls plenty. I'd like to see the finish extended down to 2nd Street or thereabouts so that there's more of a straightaway to the finish. Mile flags are great, needed a 13.1 mile marker, and the Clif Shots would have been more appreciated at 10 and 15 miles rather than 19. A bus driver who knew where she was going and that you don't drive through exit signs would have helped. Pace groups were great! This race needs chips and corrals. The start may be wide, but it narrows down fast!
3.0

By: Randy C.

Posted: December 08, 2003

Superb! Everything as promised!

This was marathon #5 for me, and I ran CIM largely based on its reputation. I wasn't disappointed. Although Saturday's weather had us a bit nervous, Sunday was beautiful! There was a bit of a headwind towards the end, but nothing too bad. I've run in much worse! Anyway - my thoughts. 1) Ultima needs to go! Nothing to it - tastes bad, no carbs, no sugar, nothing helpful! Please, ANYTHING but Ultima! 2) Agree with a previous poster - need to do Clif Shots as promised. Whether there's one spot or two, the description should match what actually happens! 3) Hills. They won't slow you down if you run them right (I agree that this is a fast course) - but if you run the race, DEFINITELY drive the course ahead of time to see what you're getting yourself into. It's a bit quirky, but run right, is blazing! And yes, the bridge does look like a mountain when you get there! This was well worth the drive, and I hope to run it again at some point! Great job guys, keep it up!
5.0

By: Baily D.

Posted: December 08, 2003

Solid

Well, it looks like this will be the first response for this year's (12/7/03) race, so they must be the most important :). Altogether it's a wonderful race--all previous comments cover it. This year we had killer weather, though there was a headwind last 10 miles or so. Organization and expo presenters were terrific. A few pieces of constructive criticism, however: (1) Race info said Cliff Shots at miles 13 and 18. They only happened at mile 20. For those who don't like to carry anything, it was very disappointing to have to wait another 7 miles for the goo. (2) With over 5,000 people, they have to start chip timing. It took me 16 seconds to get to the starting line, and another 100 yards to start striding with rhythm. Yes, the street is wide, but not wide enough for that throng. (3) NIX the relay!!! Not only does it busy the field, but as we all know there's a different energy there--make it a pure marathon. Given its increasing popularity, I'm sure money won't be lost. In fact, it would be great to bill it as 'marathon only'. (4) Finally, from what I saw (and I looked!) there were no sports drinks at the finish except for some strange tube that you open and suck on--it reminded me of the ice cream vendors. Since Ultima was the thing, why not have plenty of it around at the end. It's not entirely safe just to offer water. With all that said, it is a well organized race, with clearly friendly, committed volunteers. I imagine the large field took the directors by surprise some.
4.0

By: Mike S.

Posted: November 04, 2003

Great when the whether is good

All aspects of the run are five-star except for the time of year. The whether is very unpredicable. It is not unusual to see freezing or below temperatures and wind in Sacramento in December. An earlier date (possibly October) is now being considered for this reason. The 2002 whether was awful, but in 2003 it was superb. The course is essentially level (one small hill at the end of mile one) and actually has a net loss in elevation, and is therefore great for Boston marathon qualifying. The scenery is typical suburban to city with mostly tree lined streets, plenty of spectators (whether permitting), great mile markers (large flags with a volunteer calling out split times), and excellent aid stations. The run has a great finish that takes care of its runners.
5.0

By: david c.

Posted: September 10, 2003

Average course, but great organization and support

I've run CIM three times - 99', 00', & 01' and each time I've had the same reaction - the course is not as good as it should be when it's held in a city which Runner's World described as one of the three best cities for running in the U.S. It's uneventful (code for boring) during miles 11-17, and with all that we have to offer in SAC - trails, rivers, hills, state capitol (yes, it finishes there, but need more), & Old Town - I always feel as though I've just completed a marathon in Cleveland after running CIM. I'm sorry if I've offended transplanted Clevelanders, but I'm one too, so you ex-Revco Marathoners know what I mean. The course is touted as fast, which is not true, but that's okay as long as those entering aren't expecting PRs. While it's more of my whining and not a reason to avoid CIM, weather can be unpredictable - reference the 2001 monsoon/windstorm. I'm sure the CIM racing team has done the best they can trying to fit in SAC's best reasons for running, while planning the course for attracting maximum people support - it can't be an easy job - but with all we have to offer it would seem the course could be much better.
4.0

By: Shaun Deane

Posted: January 04, 2003

Fast and flat

Perfect west coast qualifier for Boston. This is a great race course and race organizing team.
4.0

By: James W.

Posted: January 02, 2003

A perfect weather day

This was my 3rd marathon of the year (Hono 2001, Rockn'Roll 2002 being the others). CIM was very well organized. Water stations were well run, except for the hose water which was really nasty stuff. But thank goodness for the Ultima. Even though I trained with Gatorade, I took some of the Ultima and I wasn't bothered by it. This is a course to PR on. The weather was perfect. The crowd and police support were excellent. I was bothered however by the large contingent of motorcycle gangs at the Capitol (the finish line) area that were congregating for the Toys' for Tots dropoff. The bikes roared by frequently and I was unnerved and so were many of the runners. The gas exhaust also bothered me. But it was a great day for a great run!
4.0

By: Jennifer R.

Posted: December 26, 2002

Terrific race if you've got the right weather

I prepared for this race for a long time and, thanks in part to perfect race-day weather, had a wonderful time. Course: People who complain about 'hills' in this race must not have to train on many real hills. The first half of CIM has some definite 'bumps' - usually fairly short uphills which are always followed by downhills. The second half seemed pretty flat. I thought this course would be perfect to PR on, given the right weather, and it turned out I was right. Organization: This race was incredibly well-executed, from the buses to the start, to the starting area, to the water stops, to the well-marked mile markers - where, without fail, volunteers called out the time and our average pace. Nice finish area set-up, too, though the hot soup offered was revolting to me at the time. I had been really worried about the Ultima offered at water stops, because I'd heard it was so yucky, but I trained with it and had no problems. It was always mixed perfectly and tasted better than the nasty water. (Now, having read it was hose water, I understand why!) Expo and goodies: Here's where I saw room for improvement. The expo was really small. The poster was terrible - flimsy, with not so much as a rubber band to store it. I like to frame my marathon posters, but I gave this one up as a lost cause and let my kids destroy it. The T-shirt is very nice, though, as is the medal. Food in the finishing area was pretty, well, gross. I will definitely do this one again.
5.0

By: Joe O.

Posted: December 26, 2002

My 11th marathon of the year.

I'm happy with finish 3:29:52 in CIM. I've done back to back to back marathon,San Diego Marathon (1-20-02),Huntington Beach Marathon(1-27-02),and Las Vegas International Marathon (2-3-02),also I run Los Angeles Marathon,106th Boston Marathon,Palos Verdes Marathon,San Diego Rock'n'roll Marathon, San Francisco Marathon,25th Chicago Marathon,Santa Clarita Marathon. My 1st marathon was Nov. 12,2000 Long Beach Marathon clocked 3:48:53, next year's San Diego Marathon (1-20-03) will be my 20th marathon and I'm excited to run there with PR.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 11, 2002

Fast Course, Water Stations Stink

Ran the 2002 Sacramento CIM with very little training and had my best time in years. Course is more 'rolling hills' than 'net elevation loss'--seems like you're always going up or down. Water stations were a bummer. If you go next year, bring your own water! Water stations used hose water that darn near made me choke. Plus, first water station was at 3 miles and second at 5.5. What's that about drinking early and often? Not here! Weather was perfect this year but it rained hard the year before. Expo was smaller than expected. On the plus side, the marathon relay runners keep you company. Seemed like 25% of the field was running the relay. Very surprised at the crowd support along the course. Many people drove along the course to meet their friends/relatives at various points. All in all, I'd do it again.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 09, 2002

Better than expected; Great organization & Tshirt

This was my 4th marathon and I just ran it yesterday. Luckily, it was dry, but mostly hazy with temps in 40s and 50s. After reading last year's comments, I was praying that it wouldn't rain and it didn't. Instead, it's raining today! Phew! The t-shirt is great. Not because of any particularly good artwork (although this year's was nice), but because it's a good quality dri-fit fabric that you can actually use running! In fact, since I got a long-sleeve shirt and 40 degrees is a bit chilly for me, I wore mine during the race. It was perfect. Plus, the back only has one sponsor's name on it, the Sacramento Bee (newspaper). The organization of this race was top-notch. The bib pickup and expo were painless at the Convention Center; the start line had a nice pre-race buzz; EVERY mile marker was clearly visible with a tall red or blue flag and almost every one was staffed with a volunteer or two calling out both pace and overall times; there was well staffed (and well trained) aid station (water and Ultima) near almost every mile mark; traffic control was very good; the finisher's chute was well directed (separate men's and women's) and staffed with a bib tag remover, medal presenter and space blanket giver. Running without a hitch! The course wasn't quite as dull as I had expected taking us through some pleasant rural areas and neatly manicured suburban neighborhoods sans the multitude of strip malls that I had envisioned. CIM is billed as 'The Fastest Marathon in the West' because it has a net elevation drop of 350 feet for the 26.2 mile course. The keyword is, net. There were several rolling hills along the way so the net decline was imperceptible. As a CIM runner commented last year, 'There are no easy marathons.' HALLELUJAH!! Even though I PR'ed this race, I couldn't agree more. Given that this race closes off so many suburban intersections, I was surprised how many supportive locals there were along the course. Great attitudes and the majority of them knew what to cheer: i.e., none of that, 'you're almost there' stuff. After you finish and collect your medal, there isn't a whole lot to do, but bundle up in your space blanket and enjoy the view of the nicely restored State Capital.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 20, 2002

Nice Event with wild card weatner

This was my third marathon and I was hoping cool weather and a flat course would result in a fastime and a relatively easy experience compared to efforts on other courses. The weather turned out to be unbelievably tough and the course is definately not pancake flat. Two big lessons learned: 1. There are no easy marathons 2. I signed up and ran with a pace group but as it turned out our pacer went out too fast and lost everyone but me and another person by mile 16. It seemed to me that the pacer must know what they were doing so I kept going. At about mile 18 the pacer bonked and I was on my own. I ended up being off by about 15 minutes. I am definately not mad at the pacer who I think felt really bad. Rather I should have been smart enough to back off. One slight bit off satisfaction for this 4 hour + racer. The weather was so bad that I saw many elites and otherwise serious looking runners on the sag buses as their low low bodyfat systems could not handle the conditions. Sure they would normally finish 2 hours ahead of me but in the sufferfest that was the 2001 CIM I finished and they did not. The biggest thing that encouraged me were the maniac fans, that must have been even more miserable than the runners, that were so supportive and turned out in great numbers. Only peeve with race organization was that some buses kicked people off to stand in rain at prerace and others did not.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: April 19, 2002

chilled to the bone before start

Bussing to a start not that unusual but no protection from the freezing rain and wind for the hour wait before the start. Few aid stations 1st 20 miles and most blown over by wind so only water and ultima until mile 20. The organizers should have made sure the aid stations were there and stocked..The gu tables were gone before the 9 minute people got to any of them. We(my wife and I) will never do any race at any distance where ultima is the proud sponser, that stuff should be outlawed. We purchased some for training and read the label. 1 envelope to 20 ounces of water. 80 calories in 20 ounces, so thats about,what?,4 calories in the little cup at approx. each 3 or 4 miles? As long course triathletes we had running belts with 2 bottles and 2 6 ounce gel bottles but many people were really suffering. The course is really great and people are cheering you on the entire course but doesn't make up for the aid support.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 04, 2001

Awesome Marathon-weather was fine

I was worried about the weather prior to the race. While running, it was raining, not hard though and just a few gusts of wind. I was warm and very prepared with layers as I was taught by coach, his famous words 'can't change the course or the weather, however you can just prepare yourself'. Thanks to all the fans who came out to cheer us on, it was colder for you than us runners.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 04, 2001

Rainy,windy, thunderous; but still loved it.

This year's rainstorm made this race quite a challenge which resulted in wonderful bragging rights.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 03, 2001

First Class organization

This was the second time I have run CIM. Sad to say I did not do as well as the first time. The very bad weather conditions put a damper on my enthusiasm and I made this more of a survival event than run for time. The spectators were simply fantastic. I come from San Francisco and in our Marathon there is nothing here to faintly compare itself to what I experienced in Sacramento. Thanks for the cheering sections, they were a highlight for this event that will be remembered for a long time.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 03, 2001

Weather conditions could have been better.

Overall the course was great-however the schematic drawing of the course was very misleading and NOT as downhill as expected --many rolling hills --did not notice the 300 ft downhill in the 26.2 miles. The weather absolutely sucked with the heavy downpour for the whole 25 miles for me and light drizzle in to more rain. The wind was a head wind (25-30hr) for approx 22 miles making it most unbearable with the downpour rain and the blended frequent wind gusts of 50mph. The bus was a fee, most places do not charge. There WAS NOT A Computer Chip for accurate race time- and this was for an International marathon????? Now how could anyone really get a accurate time for Boston qualifications??? Very very bad. The expo was too small and crowded--everyone buying needed rain/wind gear including leggings, jackets, earmuffs, dri-fit shirts, ponchos, trash bags, etc. However the longsleeve shirts were dri-fit and the course was lined with many beautiful spectators and dedicated volunteers to be there so early in the freezing cold. Plus there were excellent recorders yelling the split time and overall time in the howling rain and having pace setters was excellent. I don't think relays should be with the marathoners, very disturbing to the mind -seeing the runners speeding by you. Also there should have been something warm to eat, not just dry cookies and bagels, or even to drink.. JUST water.. and I finished with a 8min pace. I would never do it again. The worst weather in all marathons- even to Bostons 100th....
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 03, 2001

Good Run

This was my first marathon and was a good one to begin with. There were liquids every mile for the last six. Fan support was good considering there was 25 mph winds and heavy rain during the entire race. There was a net drop of 300ft downhill. So over all it was a good run.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 03, 2001

If you like wind and rain-this marathon is for you

Tornado warnings, torrential downpours and icy rain blowing into your face for most of the 26 miles. Previous runners of CIM say this is typical. Crowd and volunteer support was incredible due to the conditions. The course is great minus the water soaked potholes. Once was enough.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 05, 2001

Great race! come and do it!

Just a little hard to get on the starting line but great race overall
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 06, 2000

A definate PR and lots of fun!

This year's CIM (2000) was my first time doing this race. I was looking for a fast, well organized race with mild weather to go for a sub-3:10 to qualify for Boston and I got it! The race starts in a rural area outside of Sacramento and looses 350 feet elevation over the course. There are a few gentle uphills along the way and the elevation loss is very gradual and not going to beat up your quads. The spectator turnout was good despite the rural areas that the course runs through and the turnout gets even better as the course approaches the finish area on the grounds of the state capital. Support for this race was top-notch, with two volunteers at each mile-marker, one calling out elapsed time and the other calling out average pace per mile, and sometimes calling out predicted finish times. Turnout for this race is pleasantly small (3800 finished this year) making the start and finish areas easy to navigate. All in all, a great event!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: December 05, 2000

Fastest course I've ever run!

If you are looking for a PR, this is your race. I traveled from Nashville just to run in this race(12/3/2000) and it was worth it! They have a nice expo and the organization is superb. Buses take you right near the starting line from the expo hotel. All streets are completely blocked, so that there is no traffic in either direction on the entire course. It is a very gradual downhill almost the entire way. The few 'hills' are of short duration and make a nice change to the downhill (net 325 ft drop). The finish line was also very well organized, with lots of food and medical support. This was my 14th marathon and it was relatively easy to PR by 1 1/2 minutes!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 27, 2000

Almost Like Boston Without The Newton Hills!

I've run this race the last two years. Then I ran The Boston Marathon this year. (2000) CIM is very similar to the Boston course in that it is predominatly down hill to rolling hills for the first 17 to 18 miles. Then unlike Boston it flattens out. In both races you don't want to get sucked into going out too fast... and it's very easy to. I paid the price the first year I ran it and it wasn't pretty or comfortable!! Try to hold back on the early miles and you'll be rewarded with very fast time. It is a very fast course. Some people prefer flat courses to try to PR on, I feel the rolling hills and the net elevation loss works better. It allows you to use and rest muscle groups through out the race instead of stressing the same muscles for an entire 26.2 mile flat race. One thing to keep in mind is the weather can be a bit unpredictable in Northern California in December. It can be cold, (32 degree two years ago) or it can be raining (very hard down pour three years ago) or it can be perfect like last year (1999, upper 40's and a slight tail wind)
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 17, 2000

A great marathon!

This marathon is a net downhill run with few rolling hills. The aid stations are well-manned and all volunteers are helpful. The time of year usually makes it a cool run, sometimes with rain.
4.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide