Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Lake Geneva Marathon
Back

Lake Geneva Marathon - Race Reviews

3
Average rating based on 73 Reviews

By: Robert M.

Posted: June 23, 2012

Good race, but difficult

The 2012 Lake Geneva Marathon was my 22nd marathon on my way around the 50 states. I chose this one as my Wisconsin marathon because my dad was born and raised in Lake Geneva, but moved away long before I was born, so I wanted to see the town. The comments from other runners below are all on the money. The portion along Route 50 around Mile 22 was terrible. We're running on the wrong side of the road with cars whizzing by at 60 mph for at least a mile. Yeah, blocking a lane off with some cones would have made me feel much safer. But other than this, the course was beautiful. I thought the portion thru farm country was very pleasant. And yes, the hills (especially that one at Mile 16) were quite tough. As others have said, don't expect a PR here. I too noticed that the mile markers were all about 1/2 mile off. I spent much of the second half of the race wondering if the course would be short. But there was a good 1.7 miles from Mile 25 to the finish, so like the others have said, the total distance was right on the money. The nicest surprise for me was that I came in 3rd place in my Age Group and actually won an award! And this was despite the fact that I was a good 15 minutes slower than my average marathon time. I'd never won an award in anything longer than 5k, so I was thrilled. It certainly helped that there were only 5 people in my AG. I was surprised that such a small race had AGs in 5-year increments instead of 10. So if you're a middle-of-the-pack runner who has only dreamed of an Age Group award, this might be a place where you could get one. Overall, I give the race a thumbs-up. It wasn't perfect, but it was still very enjoyable. And if the mile markers and safety issue on Route 50 get corrected, then I would enthusiastically recommend this race to anyone that doesn't mind hills and small crowds.
4.0

By: Amber J.

Posted: June 06, 2012

Great race, with some quirks

Overall, a good race. The spectators were awesome, although there isn't a ton of them as mentioned before because this is such a small race. I think about 110 people in total ran the marathon. I personally really enjoyed the smallness, even the spots when you are literally running alone. Warning about the hills - you've heard it in the other reviews. At mile 16 is when they start (I had no problems on the rolling hills before this and thought I had the hills in the bag). I've never seen a hill in a race as steep as mile 16. It is like running up one of the steep hills on the streets of San Francisco. There are a couple more afterwards, but you are so totally wiped from that first nasty one that walking up the hills seems like the only option. My calves cramped like nobody's business at every slight incline the rest of the way. The mile marker signs were off from about mile 9 - end, which there is no excuse for. To make it worse, they were ahead, so you see a sign saying you just ran 15 miles, but you actually only ran about 14.5. My GPS watch had 26.4 at the end, another person's had 26.9. I know it isn't that far, but at the end of a marathon it makes a difference. The run on the 4 lane highway at mile 22 is simply unacceptable. The cars fly by, don't get into the other lane and it is extremely dangerous. I can't believe there are laws that don't require one lane to be blocked off. I can't believe no one has been hurt on this portion in the past. I thought the signage marking the trail was pretty good most of the way. However, the last 1-1.5 miles was awful - It was on a small trail behind a residental neighborhood. The trail would go off in different directions, but no further instructions on the sign. I honestly had no clue whether I was going in the right direction or not and the way the course curves, you don't see the finish until just as you are coming up on it. Overall, I enjoyed this race. I'd consider running it again...but then I have nightmares about the hill at mile 16 and think better of it. But you never know.
4.0

By: Alex C.

Posted: May 15, 2012

Great rural marathon, anticlimactic finish

Most of the comments I've seen hit the nail on the head. This is a hilly, rural race where you will have lots of time to yourself and not many people to cheer you on. If you are looking for a city-type marathon with lots of cheering crowds and other runners, look elsewhere. I thought the water stops were fine. Weather was perfect - low 50s, overcast. The finish was amazingly anticlimactic - there were a dozen people sort of half-heartedly cheering, and a few others milling about, and some fruit and water. It was kind of hilarious, or at least I would have laughed if I wasn't so exhausted. Only other downside was the route gets pretty narrow in some parts or you are competing for space with weekend tourists.
3.0

By: Mike D.

Posted: May 14, 2012

Tough run, good early season challenge

GOOD: Nice support staff; small, almost 'intimate' race crowd; plenty of serious runners and a good chance for good running weather. BAD: Signage still needs work (additional signs telling us we are on the course would be nice); the Hwy 50 section around mile 22 is really dangerous, running WITH traffic and without any cones telling drivers there is a race taking place; the last mile along the lake running through yards is ridiculous, especially since residents didn't seem to know there was a race going on! Finally, according to my Garmin, the mile markers from 13-25 were ALL off by 0.5 mile, if you can believe that; finish line was right in line with my GPS (about 26.3, as expected). UGLY: This course is HILLY and will beat the hell out of you, especially if you are used to flat road courses. This was my first time at Lake Geneva and 6th marathon. All others were flat courses- this one is a real bugger if you aren't ready for some serious hills. I was fortunate enough to run next to a LG veteran, who helped set expectations there is no shame in walking hills out here, and there are plenty of them, especially in the 2nd half. It was surprising how even the gentle up/down in the first 13 miles took it out of you for the ugly hills in the second half. If you come, don't expect PRs. All in all, I'd recommend the experience. We had a beautiful day (50s, cloudy, light breeze), the other runners were great, and I had intended this as a 'get in shape after the winter' race target. I'm glad for the experience and feel as though the tough course was a good learning experience for me. I can say with a smile that this is the only marathon I've run that I had to dodge teen girls, wait for a dog/owner to finish crossing a pedestrian bridge, and had to stop for a boat launch! Suggestion to race director- make sure that you've got some sort of signage every 1/4- 1/2 mile or so, even if we're on the same road; buy and place some cones to set up on Hwy 50 and going toward Fontana; I'd be fine if we don't have to run through yards to finish; check the placement of the mile markers for 2013!!
3.0

By: Tracy E.

Posted: May 13, 2012

Challenging, but gorgeous course!

This event was very well organized & runners & volunteers were so friendly! The course was gorgeous...ran around the lake, through local farms, some neighborhoods...very pretty & scenic & some great architecture along the way. Fellow runners & volunteers were great! Super friendly! The course itself was the hilliest road marathon I've ran & I've ran close to 40. Made for a very rewarding finish, but I wouldn't call this marathon one to race. My time was at least 15 minutes slower than normal, but I'm also not a hill runner. Regardless, it was well worth it & I'd do it again for the sheer beauty & organization! The only 'negative' I have was that the water stations were too far apart for my liking...some were 3 miles apart. I did see this on the website & should have carried water, so totally my fault for not. That small complaint was minor compared to the fun I had. The hotel staff at the host hotel was also amazing, very welcoming & supportive of the event. All-in-all, kudos to the race staff...you did a great job!
5.0

By: Alex G.

Posted: May 16, 2011

2011 Review

Pros: 1. The weather was perfect. Low 50's and overcast. 2. Volunteers were great a usual. 3. Other runners very friendly. Cons: 1. Aid stations had Heed instead of gatorade...yuck. 2. The Highway stretch depresses me. 3. NO FINISHERS MEDAL AT THE FINISH. Really?!?!. There was little sympathy towards me for this error. This is a great race, but it needs to be managed better. After I found out that they were going to send me my marathon medal in the mail, I vowed never to run this race again. I was genuinely upset after this race, when I was supposed to feel joy. My dad waited for me at the finish to take a picture of me and my medal. I had nothing around my neck for the picture. Very embarrassing. I know this comment will be followed by the race director or a friend of the race director to tell me I'm wrong and that I should be grateful. This USED to be a good race. I cannot re-comment this to anyone anymore. From the <100 turnout this year, I see that people are learning. Please change and save this race. This is as honest as I get.
3.0

By: Keith D.

Posted: May 08, 2011

Tough course, beautiful location

A very tough course through some quaint resort towns and the Wisconsin countryside. Not a place to BQ, the hills hit you hard at mile 16 and again at 21. I found the water stops sufficient but I didn't like the watered down HEED much. Thankfully, some had Gatorade. Ran alone a lot and while I didn't like the route along the highway, at least the shoulder is wide. They could use some more signage when the route gets to the lake trail. It is kind of confusing for those of us who are on our last legs. Finally, if you want the pizza luncheon, don't shower first. Get over to the hotel and eat first or else you won't get anything. Finally, 2011 saw some confusion at the end, apparently either a box of medals was misnamed or they were giving out full marathon medals to the half and European 22 mile runners, so that many of the Marathoners arrived and the medals were gone. I guess they'll be sent in the mail. The only other gripe is that at the finish, they hand you a bottle of water and then you can stumble about another half mile or so until you get to the hotel for the food. It would have been nice to have some goodies at the end and some signage to show us the way back to the hotel. All in all, I enjoyed the run and hope to be back.
3.0

By: Mike M.

Posted: June 05, 2010

You get what you come here for. An honest run.

Most of the complaints I read about this one are disingenuous and based largely on misplaced expectations. This is a $50, late-spring run in a 5,000-person resort town, pre-season. It's just a different race. You want 26 water stops, spectators, signs, and every possible advantage? Wrong race. You want gorgeous scenery, a challenging course, and a deeply personal experience? Do the LGM. Carry one bottle and water stops become plentiful. The lake path portion had to be shortened - owners made it more difficult (and more path means fewer water stops). If you need an iPod, can't run alone, can't carry a bottle, and have to have a PR, then just stay away. I loved every bit of this race. The partially open course meant my wife could support me throughout. The dearth of spectators made for a thoroughly introspective and personally satisfying journey, like a trail run on the road. I got everything I came here for. I've run the half a few times before and the same great volunteers are here year after year. Stay the weekend and have the ultimate small-town adventure.
5.0

By: Steve E.

Posted: June 02, 2010

Some course trouble

Interesting course choice. I saw people who stated that they did the marathon but actually ran the adventure course - and a couple of others who took the half marathon route, both cutting miles off of the 26.2 mileage. I agree about the safety of running uphill along the highway. When the course left the roadway and went to a trail along the lake... so did the directions. I felt lost and actually found a woman runner who was also confused about which way to go. I chose to shower before going back to eat. Bad idea. Pizza scraps and no soda. This is one I will have trouble recommending to anyone.
2.0

By: Alexander M.

Posted: May 21, 2010

Beautiful and hilly marathon

I have been running this marathon since 2005, only missing 2009. This is one of the most scenic marathons I have ever run. Yes, it is hilly, but that adds to the experience of this race. Downsides: The change in the marathon route between miles 22 and 23 was not a good change. This is the most miserable stretch of the race. You go from scenic pastoral running to a dangerous four-lane highway. Three years ago the route took you down to the lake, running on the paths. This needs to be changed back! I didn't run last year because of the change. It still bothers me. I probably won't run this race again until it gets changed back. I didn't get my shirt at packet pickup. Apparently they "ran out" even though there was a box of shirts in sight. This is the second time this has happened in the past two years. The race director needs to be more organized. Nothing should have been changed. It was a great race.
3.0

By: Jim B.

Posted: May 10, 2010

Very hilly but scenic course with poor support.

The course is extremely hilly, but it has some beautiful scenery. Not a place for a PR, but if you're looking for a challenge, this will do it. Poorly marked course with the route running along a lakefront path and through backyards at the end - with minimal signage and no other guidance. Very little crowd support as well. Watered down HEED and minimal porta-a-potties also left room for improvement. Once was OK, but it's probably not one that I'll repeat.
2.0

By: john f.

Posted: May 09, 2010

Great course; needs more porta-potties

The course is very, very challenging; you won't want to run or see another hill for some time. This was great for those who needed a change from the flat marathons. I really enjoyed the challenge. The weather was a perfect 43 degrees. I would recommend this to those who think they have run all possible marathons. This course will change that thought in a heartbeat. They do need more then one porta-potty per stop. I waited 5 minutes in line. The water stations could have been 2 miles apart instead of 3 miles. Next time use Gatorade - not HEED. Try the hills for the change of pace.
3.0

By: Jeffrey R.

Posted: May 09, 2010

very different marathon

This was my 25th marathon and one of the most different ones I have run. It was not all bad, but not all good. First, for the course, it was like they went out and marked a 26-mile training run using arrow signs to direct you. The only place there were people directing you where to go was at the half and marathon split. Once we - the marathoners - split off, we basically had to follow the signs. There was one intersection were the police stopped traffic, but other than that, you were pretty much on your own. It was pretty unnerving running miles 18 through 20 along a major 4-lane highway with our backs to traffic and cars going by a foot away at 60 mph. I felt like I was one teenager text message away from death. Then there were the water stops - anything from one guy sitting in his front yard reading the paper to 10 people cheering you on. A big thanks to all of those who came out in 39-degree weather with 30 mph cold winds and mist. It was very hilly course and a great workout. Packet pickup was great and it was nice to stay indoors at the hotel in the cold weather until 5 minutes before race time. The final 6 miles were cruel. It seemed like 90% of miles 20 through 25 were uphill, and then the last mile along the lake path was spent saying hi to all of the people working on their yards, docks etc. The best part were all of the people associated with the marathon - from packet pickup to the water stops to the finish line. Everybody was great. Even people just waiting for other runners at the finish were really supportive Like I said, just a really different marathon.
4.0

By: Michael R.

Posted: May 08, 2010

A Great Challenge

I know this race has the reputation of being loosely organized, but I found it to be really well done by a small army of generous, enthusiastic, supportive volunteers. The hills punish you twice - going up on your cardiovascular system and going down on your joints. The small number of participants makes the mental challenge significantly greater. The spectators were terrific and brave, too, considering the cold!
4.0

By: Leon Lavallin

Posted: May 03, 2010

Great first-marathon experience

Last year was my first marathon. I live in Lake Geneva, so my first thought was of course to run the marathon on my doorstep. This was never going to be a course on which to run a quick time, which didn't bother me, as all I wanted to do was finish! It's true the support is pretty minimal, but there are supporters out there. I had my own support, which was great to keep me going. I understand people not liking the section on the highway - it is a highway. I don't know how much people appreciate that there is an event going on. There is room to move over and keep away from the cars. It's a judgment you would have to make. For me it was an awesome day; I will do it every year, if I can. I will be running this year too (2010)
3.0

By: Amy Reynolds

Posted: February 16, 2010

My first half marathon

While I have done two marathons, this was my first half. I decided to do this one because I live in Chicago and wanted something close and familiar. I know the area very well, so it was perfect. It is hilly, so make sure you train for those hills and inclines. I made my time goal on this course, so that was exciting for me. I am one who trains alone, so this was another reason I like the course. Not a lot of people racing the course, so for me, it was nice to "zone" out; however, when you were running with the group, there was great energy and it was very friendly. There could have been more water stations in the country road area, and yes, there was not much fan support. But overall, I will be doing this race again and again.
3.0

By: Elizabeth E.

Posted: January 04, 2010

Fun change but no fast times

I ran the "Euro XC Marathon," which is actually like 22 miles. This takes place on a footpath that goes around Lake Geneva, basically along the shore of the lake through the front edge of people's lawns. Every property you cross has a different idea of how to define the path, from a slightly worn grassy trail to bricks to gravel to patio-type cement circles and more. If you want a fast run, this is not the place. If you want scenic views of the lake, a chance to look at some great landscaping and expensive houses, and a really varied running surface, you'll enjoy this. Support is minimal, so a Fuel Belt or the like is a good idea, as is any food you want to consume along the way. There are not a lot of runners, but I happened to match paces with a guy also running alone, and we kept each other company through much of the run. There are no mile markers, so if it is really important for you to know where you are, you will want your Garmin for sure. As I said, not the place for a PR, but I plan to run it again this spring just because it was such a change from my normal routine of road running. Come prepared and stay relaxed, and you'll have a good time!
3.0

By: Keith L.

Posted: May 24, 2009

Beautiful, but a bit lonely out on those hills!

Overall, this is a very picturesque race with lots of fields and barns and beautiful greenery. Wisconsin is really pretty! There were very sparse spectators and rare water stations. Some of the mile markers had blown away in the 5-10 mile range and I found myself feeling all alone for many miles. The hills were very challenging. Despite these issues, I really did love this race. The last mile was great as we ran on a small lane that encircled the lake. This took us along beautiful backyards below shady trees - an amazing way to end such a tough run. If you want a gorgeous, rural race without many bells and whistles but one that will make you work, this one is for you.
3.0

By: Thomas P.

Posted: May 12, 2009

Nice, small-town marathon on a budget

This is a very nice, small-town marathon event on a budget. If you seek a more traditional old-time marathon experience, without the bells and whistles of modern big-city events, this would be a good choice. This marathon is most definitely not for new PR's or BQ's. The course is challenging, especially in the second half, with some monster hills. The first half is very nice and I will definitely go back to do the half marathon every year from now on. For those looking to do a marathon in each of the 50 states, this one would be a very good one for Wisconsin. You will get a nice sampling of everything Wisconsin on the course. I had so much fun with this one.
3.0

By: Kim S.

Posted: May 11, 2009

Very challenging course. Not for novices.

Parts of this marathon are so scenic and beautiful (ironically, nowhere near the lake; the best stretches take place in the rolling hills of farmland - very little of the course actually borders the lake), it almost makes up for having to run miles 21-23 on the shoulder of a highway (without cones or any sort of marker signaling a race going on) and the utter lack of aid stations. Of the few stations that you encounter, fewer than half offer anything other than water. Around mile 23, there was a wonderful couple in front of their house with orange slices and Gatorade; if not for them, I doubt I would have made it through. Having trained all winter in brutal Chicago weather, I thought I would be in decent shape for a May marathon. I didn't count on the hills around Lake Geneva being as tough as they were, or the fact that I might be running alone for miles at a stretch, with very little in the way of course markers! This was not a good choice for a first marathon, but I could see how someone seeking a technically rigorous course might appreciate it.
2.0

By: ammie H.

Posted: May 10, 2009

Beautiful, challenging but lack of support

It is a challenging, beautiful, and hilly course, but the race organizers try to do too many events with not enough staff. They should cut back the number of races and focus on quality for the others. VERY small for all three "marathon" events.
2.0

By: Joel W.

Posted: January 07, 2009

Very small race and very hilly course

I have never run the full marathon in Lake Geneva, but I have run the other races (5K, 10K and half). Here is what to expect: few race volunteers, packet pick up will be a little disorganized, there will be almost no crowd support, weather is usually perfect, the area is very scenic and the entry fee is cheap (compared to Chicago races). If you know this going into the race, you will enjoy the race. If you expect a Chicago Marathon-type race experience, you will be very disappointed.
2.0

By: Christopher Stevens

Posted: August 20, 2008

Tough one...

This was, in my opinion, one tough course. Concerning hills, I've done one dozen marathons and this one has the most. I didn't run it for the cheering section - I ran it for the challenge. If you want a cheering section, run Chicago.
4.0

By: Rick Hilderth

Posted: May 22, 2008

A good, small-town marathon, but not enough fans.

This was my first time here and my second marathon, and I enjoyed this race very much. The first seven were run with the half marathoners so there were a lot of people to run and pace with but not so many that it was overcrowded. Once the marathon split, it thinned out considerably until we joined with them again for the last three miles of their race. There was one really killer hill right before the 17-mile mark, but the rest were not that bad. I thought the majority of the hills were long and not very steep, except for a few others near Fontanna. The only problem I had was that they did not shut down the roads, so there were some cars. It got especially bad running down the shoulder of a four-lane highway. Also, the spectators were not very willing to cheer people on. Aside from at each of the finishes and the aid station, the majority of the people I saw didn't cheer for me they were to busy looking for their friends. Again, overall this was a very good small-town race. The course markers, although small, were easy to find and follow, and their was an abundance of aid stations. I would recommend this race to anyone who is looking for a fun and challenging marathon, especially if they're just starting out.
4.0

By: Przemek K.

Posted: May 15, 2008

Great location; poor support and course

Lake Geneva Marathon is not a bad small-town marathon. It's best advantage is a location. You run around the lake, but places where you actually see the water are very rare. Usually the course is on the country roads or residential areas. The event is small - about 140 marathon runners and 200 half. There is little support along the course, and whatever support there is, is minimal. Expect to get only water and Gatorade along the way. No food - maybe that's why you get a Clif Bar, and a gel in your registration pack. My biggest complaint: safety! Late in the run, around mile 20, you run on a very busy road. Two-lane road, where trucks and school buses are doing 60 MPH right next to you, three feet away from you! There are no cones separating you from the traffic, let alone the police presence! That is very unsafe, waiting for a poor runner to catch a cramp (likely at this stage in the run) and swerve into the traffic. Additionally, the course directions are very poor. Little arrows leading the way are hard to see, small, placed inconsistently and occasionally just missing. Just hope to be in the middle of the crowd, so you won't get lost. If you lead the pack, keep your eyes wide open. I will not run this marathon again due to my own safety and will discourage my friends also. I've run over 15 marathons and I know what I'm talking about. This is the worst marathon in regards to organization and safety. Still, the registration center and the number packet were nice, and pretty well organized.
2.0

By: Kevin C.

Posted: May 13, 2008

Can't help but love this race.

This is the second year in a row that I have run this race and I must say that despite its faults, it is a great race! First the positives: 1. The course is wonderful. Not flat, but not extraordinarily hilly either. There are some big hills at certain spots but nothing that is not manageable. 2. The weather: It seems it is always about 50 degrees with just a little bit of sun- perfect running weather! 3. The people: I really felt welcomed and well supported by the fans and race officials that I did see. (There are not a lot, but the few I saw were awesome). Now the negatives: 1. As I commented last year, the course could be marked in a more obvious fashion. It was better this year, but at mile 20, it was still confusing as to which way the marathon goes and which way the euro cross race goes. I saw one marathoner go the wrong way and another marathoner had to yell out to him to get him back on the course. 2. Water stations: While I believe there were more of them this year, I would still like more. However, it is doable with what they have. 3. This is just a personal preference, but I actually liked the sweatshirt from 2007 better than the sweat wicking t-shirt from 2008. Overall I recommend this marathon as long as you are not someone who feels they need to be pampered while running a race. If you are looking for a race that is not too expensive, a fun run, and you can live without some of the perks of big races this is your race.
4.0

By: Dan S.

Posted: May 13, 2008

The Little Marathon That Could

This was my first marathon ever and I thought it was fantastic. I would caution everyone to read as many comments as possible here because past LGMs have apparently had their share of problems, but I loved the 2008 version. Water stops were plentiful. The course was scenic and very hilly, but don't let that intimidate you. If you are mentally prepared for a marathon, you can be ready for these hills (I was and did not train for hills!). I have a few small constructive suggestions: the map could have been formatted better, the course could have been marked a bit better and the people handing out timing chips and numbers could have been a bit more instructive. I heard some people talking about getting lost but they did not even seem so bothered by it. Adventure is the spice of life, right? Just don't count on this race for a qualifier or personal best of any kind, keep an open mind, don't be a race snob and you will love it too.
4.0

By: Corinna R.

Posted: May 12, 2008

GREAT IMPROVEMENT

Based on prior years' comments, I was very apprehensive going into this race. However, I thought it was great. Water stops were nicely spaced along the route, well marked with mile marker signs/arrows and spray paint on the road. Can't help the spectator issue... it is a small race. The hills are a good challenge for the experienced runner! (And a killer for the novice!)
4.0

By: Nick L.

Posted: May 12, 2008

Challenging Course, Recommended

This was my first marathon, and I am glad I got to experience such a challenging course the first time out! My only complaint would be mile markings not displayed prominently. However, running out in the country with a small collection of great spectators was terrific. The hills were tough - but the organizers don't hide that fact. All the runners were giving each other support as if we all knew what we were going through. Extremely rewarding to finish such a tough course.
4.0

By: Kay K.

Posted: May 11, 2008

Very Disorganized

I was very surprised with the lack of organization for these events. It is billed as Marathon Weekend and there was no indication that anything was happening in this town. No one knew where the start line was. No banners, no signs, no microphones - unreal. It was like a crappy 5K. No mile markers. No spectators. Rather sad event. It was clear that they don't get repeat runners. No one knew what was going on.
1.0

By: Leslie K.

Posted: May 15, 2007

VERY DISORGANIZED!!

This was the first time my husband and I ran this half marathon. The packet pick-up was disorganized and shoved in a small space. On race day there was not one indication of where the start line was! There was NO spectators. I felt like I was running a neighborhood 5k. The course was nice for the first 5 miles, but out in the middle of nowhere for the rest of the race. NO miles markers anywhere!!! The hills were killer. Over all very disappointed and won't run in again.
1.0

By: Kevin C.

Posted: May 15, 2007

Nice little marathon

I liked this marathon. Yes, you run out in the country for a large part of it and, yes, the hills from mile 16 to 23ish are horrendous; but I really enjoyed the rest of the course. The part I didn't like was the organization. The race needs to be marked more clearly. I almost got lost at mile 20, luckily the nice lady running near me steered me in the right direction, thanks again whoever you were:). Also, in the hardest part of the course mile 16 to the end there was 2 water stations, just not enough. More water stations and better marking and this would be a great race. I hope to do it again next year.
3.0

By: William S.

Posted: May 14, 2007

Great Race - but 'Buyer Beware'

Going into this marathon I had read the posts on Marathonguide.com. I heard about the lack of organization and crowd support and etc. Still I registered for this marathon and I had a great time. Why? Because I knew what I was buying and it was a fair price. A marathon for $ 50. What a deal. Yes, there was little organization and there could be some improvements but let's not try to compare every marathon out there to the mega marathon that ask $ 100 + for registration and have 40,000 people register. It is a world of difference. Our expectations should adjust accordingly. I had a great time. It was technically one of the most challenging marathons I have run (last 10 miles)and the some of the odd course layouts (yards) just made the adventure more wild. Good times diving in Lake Geneva at the end. Cold yes, but so refreshing.
3.0

By: Bill S.

Posted: May 14, 2007

Enjoyable hilly race

I arrived at 6:30 am and parked for free on a side street one block from the hotel where registration was located. No lines at all at packet pickup, very smooth. There was a very helpful lady at the course map answering questions. Race started right on time with a blast of a boat horn. Nice touch. It was a beautiful day for a marathon. The first 2 miles are nice along the east shore of Lake Geneva. Miles 3 thru 13 are out in the farm country. The real race begins around mile 14 when you get into Fontana. There is a huge hill coming out of Fontana, then numerous smaller ones all the way to the finish with the exception of a small stretch on the lakefront. The 22-mile euro-marathon looked interesting because it sticks to the lakefront, unlike the full marathon. The course makes a lot of turns so you need to watch for the small arrow signs and paint on the pavement. Often I was running with no other runners in sight, but had no trouble sticking to the route. Mile markers were mostly all there, a few were missing in the 20-25 mile range it seemed. This is a small fun marathon with hills on the second half. I had no trouble with the organization of this race which seems to be a common complaint in past years. The medal was small and in a design of the state of Wisconsin. Nothing special. No food at the finish line, only water. Adequate water stations throughout the course. Only one station had any food that I saw (bananas). Carry your own gels! No fans to speak of, but if you want fans, run Chicago. I thought this race would follow the lakefront more. It really only did for about 4 miles out of 26.2. The rest of the race the lake is not in view. I may run the euro next year to stay by the lake.
4.0

By: Todd L.

Posted: May 14, 2007

Worst marathon EVER!!!!

Race was poorly organized. Not enough water stops and people at the water stops were NOT helpful at all - some did not even know what mile marker they were at. Neither I nor my running group will never participate in this race again - COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME AND EFFORT!!!!!
1.0

By: Brad Necker

Posted: May 14, 2007

NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART

I was supposed to run the euro 22 miler. The map I was given at the registration desk was in black and white and nearly indecipherable. It supposedly outlined the 5k, 10k, 1/2 marathon, and full marathon only, the euro 22 miler was missing. I couldn't make sense of any of it. Mile markers were unclear and water stops weren't where they were supposed to be. After about 5 miles there was a sign pointing the euro runners toward a path that dead-ended at at the lake and a fence blocked the way we suspected we were supposed to go. We climbed rocks to get to the street and before we knew it, we were out in the country and a long way from the euro route. Our only option was to run the 1/2 marathon or the full, I chose the full. The course was non stop up-hill and it kicked my butt. I hated it and loved it at the same time. This isn't a spectator course and it isn't glorious, it's for serious runners out to accomplish a serious run. I started along the lake and went out to farm country where cars whizzed by at 60 mph. I ran back to town where the hills were so tough I didn't see one person that was able to run up them. Eventually we ended up back at the lake where we ran through millionaires' front lawns. You can tell they aren't happy about the race because maybe 50 or so left their soon-to-be-installed piers blocking the path. I heard countless curses shouted by other runners as they tried to maneuver around them or trampled through mud or up and down stairs. The course (though at parts is beautiful) is almost unbelievable. After 23 years of this race being run, it's almost hard to believe how poorly organized it is run. As long as you can go into it expecting the worst (as I did after reading reviews on this site) it's still a good time and I am a better runner today after having run it yesterday. I would recommend it for anyone who is serious about running and is looking for a real adventure. Don't do this one for your first marathon. On runner told me that this was his first marathon and that he was so discouraged by the course that it would be his last.
2.0

By: Joanna B.

Posted: May 13, 2007

Beautiful scenery.... A lot else to be desired.

In some ways I do appreciate this marathon. I loved the diversity of the landscapes (farm fields, lakes, neighborhoods, trails, horse gables, etc.) however I have little else positive to say. There were small mile markers, which would not pose a problem if there were course marshals on the course directing traffic. I did not see a course marshal or first-aid center the entire course. Many of times I was on a road with no one in front of me, behind me and no visible markers. The walkers began at 5 a.m. (which was my case) and we didn't have a rest stop until mile 12! When I got to mile 12 and asked if I could get water or Gatorade, the organizer of that station said, "We were told not to set up until 8 a.m. (3 hours after the walkers began, mind you) and this is really intended for the runners!" That was very disheartening. I will never do the Lake Geneva Marathon and although I liked the beautiful, serene scenery, I will not participate in the future.
2.0

By: Rebecca S.

Posted: May 13, 2007

Beautiful but tough

This was my 39th marathon and definitely one of the toughest. The marathon route was pretty and scenic, although there were stretches that were very rural (but nice). Aid stations seemed too far apart (especially in the last 6-8 miles when you need them the most). I really enjoyed the course for the most part, but the hills in the last half were a killer. At the halfway point, I was wondering why many had said the course was tough. The city of Lake Geneva is beautiful. I'm glad I made the trip. If you're looking for a marathon with lots of perks, organization and fanfare, this is not the one.
3.0

By: David Siegfried

Posted: May 13, 2007

Awesome Small Marathon with KILLER HILLS!!!

This is my first time running this marathon. The first 1/2 mile there is a nice hill, but that turns out to be a small one compared to the ones later in the course. There were times we ended up on the lake path behind houses on the lake, and I think it was a bit dangerous. Otherwise it was a great, challenging course. There were many friendly volunteers and spectators. I think I ran 8 miles in the first half by myself. The only complaint was not enough recovery food at the finish. I would recommend this marathon if you're up for a hilly adventure and not trying to get a PR.
4.0

By: Kathy A.

Posted: May 12, 2007

I enjoyed the course (very pretty), but bad org.

We did the walk marathon, and we arrived at 4:30 to get our sweatshirts and numbers. There was a guy sitting in a car in a small parking lot, and nothing telling us who he was! And we couldn't get a chip; they were out! So everything we accomplished wasn't even counted and our name aren't anywheres on the finish line! But we did finish it and are glad that we did! It was our first. I also thought there could have been more porta-potties and water.
3.0

By: Geoff H.

Posted: March 25, 2007

Needs Clearer Markings

I ran the full marathon in 1999 as my 2nd. The hills were a killer. I was somewhat disappointed as I expected a more scenic setting. Instead, I felt mostly out in "cow town" on the rural highway. There are several things that should be improved on (and it looks by more recent comments, that this some would still apply): 1) Clearer markings and/or volunteers and critical turns giving directions. In a very low-key marathon with 2 races (25K) starting at once, it is EASY make a wrong turn! 2) More porta-johns (fortunately I did not need to use them); I only recalled 1 or 2 porta-john stops with only a few porat johns 3) More finish-line support. The year I ran, there was no one taking pictures (maybe no company wants to). Another year, I heard that they skipped finisher medals. In light of such, I would recommend this marathon realy only as a "training run."
1.0

By: John H.

Posted: January 17, 2007

Worst. Marathon. Ever

I did this a couple years ago and was shocked at the lack of support. At some point after mile 20 there was a 'water stop' which consisted of a water cooler on a chair with some cups lying next to it. Shocked was all I could think. The course isn't bad but the organization was just plain awful. Do yourself a favor and skip this marathon.
2.0

By: Clay Williams

Posted: May 15, 2006

FANTASTIC RACE

I ran the 22 mile eurocross and am reluctant to give it anything but five stars, so I lied about the organization and the spectators. The course around the lake was beautiful. You run on nearly every type of surface imaginable: Wood decking, stone paving stones, stone & brick walkways, blacktop, mud, grass, ceramic pavers, beach sand and gravel. You dodge the piers that haven't yet been put in the water &#40;and an occassional boat&#41;, but how often do you get to run through a millionaire's back yard and not get chased? Sure it rained all day. Yea, the directional signs weren't great and I got lost a few times, yes, they said water would be at mile 7 & 13 and actually it was at mile 3.5 and 9, admittedly there were almost no cheering throngs and I ran alone most of the time, but it all added up to a thouroughly quirky good time. Even if it isn't part of a race, run the lakeshore path. To get to do it and have some support and get a medal and a sweatshirt just makes it better. I've done 19 marathons in all parts of the country and this is one of the best. If I could give it ten stars I would.
5.0

By: Todd B.

Posted: May 15, 2006

You either love it or you hate it--I'm the latter

I'll try to 'say something good or say nothing at all'. Will confess I was not well-rested after fighting I-90 construction the night before and getting 3 hours less sleep than I like. Marathon number 11 for me--least favorite. Small number of participants &#40;99&#41;, but the other 7 events running concurrently overwhelmed the registration desk--line was 45-50 people at times. Beautiful lakefront property, but I did not like running through back yards on trail that had widely differing pavers and no mile markers. Mile markers clearly painted on the road only, IF you were running on the right side to see them &#40;how about cones with the numbers clearly visible??&#41;. Red arrows directed you at the turns, if you could see the tree, mailbox, post, or stake they were fixed to. Faithful crowd &#40;in the rain&#41;--mainly family of the runners &#40;less than 20 the whole marathon, though it was cloudy and raining&#41;. &#40;A business manager in the Riviera building that afternoon was unaware the event took place right in front of their building--little publicity?&#41; Aide station at mile 22 &#40;4:10 hours for me&#41; had no table, no people, only cups of Gatorade lying on the side of the road &#40;perhaps called away on emergency??&#41; Nice pizza/salad/soup buffet afterwards, but the facility had far too little seating for all participants--how many want to STAND and balance plate, cup, soup bowl after running 26.2? And sorry, but the medal stinks--no year on it, basic. Looks like the same one is used each year. Sorry -- would not recommend this, though by other reviews, some loved it.
2.0

By: Katherine K.

Posted: May 15, 2006

Fun Marathon

This is the most fun course I have ever run, despite the cold rain (can't blame the race director for that). The first part was flat, through rural areas with cows, farms etc. Then came the hills and Victorian neighborhoods. The last part was the most fun on the lakefront path through people's yards. Yes, the hills were tough but if you go in knowing that, they are doable- just don't plan on a PR. They had an early start for walkers which was great. Very walker/ slow jogger friendly. A free lunch was held afterwards which was great: pizza, salad, great cheesy bread sticks, cookies etc. Usually you get a bagel and a banana, but not here! The YMCA was available for showers after the race, a nice touch for people travelling in for the race. If you need a big expo and lots of cheering crowd support, better look elsewhere. But if you just want a fun, low-key, well organized marathon that is easily worth the marathon fee, check this one out. I would definitely recommend this race to anyone who wants to have a good time and run a challenging course.
5.0

By: tony s.

Posted: May 14, 2006

Brutal! Brutal! Brutal!

This was my 4th marathon - all Chicago, with the exception of this one in Lake Geneva. I heard past comments about mile 16 plus - with the hills - and they weren't wrong! Forgetting the course, however, it was very disappointing to cross the finish line and be handed a bottle of water along with 'thanks' for participating. What, no fruit? Not even a granola bar? My son ran the 1/2 marathon - same place, same time, and crossed the finish line awaited with fruit galore! Also, mile markers were so-so, and not enough water stations. All in all, after 21 years doing this, I would have hoped for a more well-run event. Won't do it again!
2.0

By: Dean Diefendorf

Posted: May 14, 2006

Very scenic course!

I love these small town marathons. Very scenic marathon! You start off running by Lake Geneva and then through farm land. It is true that there are some hills around mile 17 or so, but nothing outrageous. The course ends by running along the lake once again....the lakeside houses are stunning. My suggestion to the race director would be to better mark the course. Towards the end it was a bit confusing.
3.0

By: Brent P.

Posted: May 13, 2006

No mile markers for 1/2 and slow bus to start

I loved this course; the hills are tough, but very scenic and worth the extra effort. However, after mile 6 the mile markers for the 1/2 marathon disappear (the marathon course takes an additional loop and reconnects). Also, the bus back to the start leaves too infrequently... we waited almost an hour in the rain for the bus that was too full and we had to stand. Also, the t-shirt design sucks every year; can't they do something cool and NOT tan?
2.0

By: Chris Sloan

Posted: March 06, 2006

Great time, great scenery - stop crying about hill

I had a great time running the full marathon. I was running it as a warm-up for the Ice Age 50-Miler the following weekend. Sure the hills were tough, but that was expected. If you don't want to run hills then go to Chicago and run on the lakefront (boring). I especially liked the end of the race where you actually run through people's lakefront backyards!! The pre-race dinner was good and full of food, the post-race food was great, but the prizes completely sucked. I was first in my age group and got a crappy six-pack cooler that said, "Lake Geneva," and had a hole in it. I would definitely run the marathon again if I was still in the area. Cheers!!
4.0

By: nick p.

Posted: February 04, 2006

not the best

I did 25K and was left behind with ten others by the bus. Was even told he would be back, but he was not. We all missed awards and food, and did not get picked up until it was all over 3 hours later... not to mention many of us didn't get t-shirts with registration (the ones we were promised). A year later, I gave the race director one more chance, and I ran the very hilly Snake Hill 10K. Again, a wreck.... He ran out of medals (I finished 1st in my division), promised to send them, and never did. This is my hometown and I will never try his races again.
2.0

By: Mandi J.

Posted: December 14, 2005

Too Hilly

This race was really pretty when it was near the lake. But the mile 17 and 18 hills were absolutely awful. It was nice by the lake but I wish it was by the lake more than we were. There also were not many spectators besides a small group of great people that followed us around offering support. They were great, but more support would've been even better. The bad part was the hills, my race time was awful, but at least I finished.
2.0

By: Rob Runkle

Posted: May 10, 2005

Beautiful Race - Tough Hills

This was a great little race. I ran the 26.2 mile version. With this course, the 1/2 marathoners took a shortcut, and their 11-mile point was at about the 13th mile for the FULL. That was kind of cool for me, because, when I met up with the 1/2 marathoners again, the people at that pace were about 1-2 min/mile slower than my current pace. This just boosted my spirits, as it made me feel like I was going faster, since I was able to pass people. Thanks to those 1/2ers. You carried me to mile 16... The course was pretty easy up til the 16 mile point. Mile 17 was killer, and after mile 17, it didn't seem to get much better, but that might have just been the effects of having miles on the legs. I ran (shuffled) mile 17, because I was stubborn, but I think that it caught up to me later. I walked several of the later hills. If I had it to do over, I'd walk the mile 17 hills, and save something for the later hills.
3.0

By: Shelley C.

Posted: May 07, 2005

hills not exaggerated

Did this as my first marathon and was continually surprised by the number and incline of the hills. Also felt lost and unsure about the route at times after about mile 16. Need better markings and mile markers. Had to run through a bush at one point on the lake path or else jump in the water as it was blocking the path.
3.0

By: Chuck Evans

Posted: June 07, 2004

Most challenging and fun race ever.

I ran this for the first time this year because I wasn't able to join friends in Cincinatti for 'The Flying Pig'. This was a riot... from the pasta dinner the night before and a expo with one table to finishing a fun, challenging course with only 85 others doing the marathon. Yes, there are hellish hills and obstacles on the lake path. I arrived the night before to see lightning crashing down into the lake and awoke to cold rain, followed by sun. My favorite comment came from a woman who asked me at the beginning of the race "Which are you running?" I told her the full marathon and she pointed out (because course maps suck) that "there are nasty hills after Fontana." I responded "Okay, so I prepare for hills after Fontana..." Her response: "No. There are hills all through the course, it's just the worst ones are AFTER Fontana!" Many runners echoed this and it put me in a very conservative mode for running the race which made it fun, enjoyable and took all the time pressure off as soon as I knew that I'd be running hills that would suck the speed out of my race. Don't run this if you are trying to find a qualifying race... run this if you want to try running something other than an urban race with 40,000 people. It was a riot!!
4.0

By: Joe M.

Posted: May 12, 2004

Fun marathon but be aware of what lies ahead.

This was my 24th but by far the smallest marathon. I had read about the hills but was still surprised by the incline. My biggest complaint would be the markings. After the 25K turned off, I was really alone and often not sure I was still on the course. More sprayed LGM's on the road would suffice. Additional mile markers would also be nice. The lake trail could be dangerous without slowing down. It was more of an obstacle course with the steps and piers on the trail The brunch and awards at the resturant were a nice touch. All things considered, if you are looking for a fun marathon without worrying about times, I would certainly recommend this race.
3.0

By: Ed Sauder

Posted: May 03, 2004

Small marathon, hilly course, run alone.

Have run this marathon 11 times. Love the challanging course. Tough hills start at 16-17 miles. Wimps go to Boston. Course is a circle, so if windy, only lasts awhile. Wish they would mark the mile splits accurately. Forget about a fast time. Great finish along the lake.
3.0

By: louie tieman

Posted: January 17, 2004

Put this on your 'to do' list of marathons

Was really enjoyable to do the euro cross-country. Have done it twice and really enjoyed it. Nice party town and clear blue lake. All of us from KENNEKUK enjoyed it.
4.0

By: ryan stricker

Posted: June 04, 2003

Flat first half , hill after hill second half.

I was not ready for the hills in the second half. With only 109 runners in the full marathon, I felt alone on the second half (4:40 finish). Need more markers; I was unable to determine where I was, except for the start/half/and finish. Hill training a must. Great drink stations, but no fruit 'til finish. Not recommended for first marathon. I was pushed to my limits, and I will run it next year.
3.0

By: Cheryl M.

Posted: May 12, 2003

Challenging, but beautiful

Before signing up for this marathon, I studied all of the comments from the previous years, so I was aware of some of the 'faults' from the past. Docks were still pulled up across the paths, and there could have been a few more water stops, but one could not have asked for a more perfect day weather-wise or a more beautiful course... not to mention interesting. The paths along the lake were hard to run on in some areas, and I literally had to stop and laugh when I came to the stairs somewhere after mile 20. You gotta be kidding! I am not a fast runner, so things like this (plus, did I mention the hills) make for a memorable run. The horn from the boat just off shore was a fun way to start the race, too. I would consider doing this marathon again if I am in the area. My only negative comment is that I wish the race committee would have informed everyone to park on the side streets and not at the metered spaces! I returned to my car just as the meter maid was getting ready to put ANOTHER parking ticket on my car. There were some very ANGRY people over this. Being from out of town, I had no way of knowing where else to park. I don't think any of the several hundred runners (there were several events) were aware that tickets would be written either. So my advice is to park on a side street and enjoy a good run.
4.0

By: Tim S.

Posted: May 12, 2003

Euro X-Country Marathon Comments

I ran the 25k course last year, and this year stepped up to the x-country race. As advertised, 22 miles of sidewalks, trails, grass, paving stones, and piers (like running through backyards and park hiking trails). It's a hard course, but lots of fun. Because it's not on roads, there's little to no spectator presence. Better organization at the end of the 25k course this year, thanks folks. My only constructive comment would be to offer some liquid a little earlier for the x-country runners. If you're feeling adventurous, try this race.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 12, 2002

Pretty but tough course, room for improvement

The Lake Geneva Marathon was my 5th marathon in 5 months--I am attempting 12 marathons in 12 months. This was my 11th marathon overall, and I have run a variety of them from the huge urban marathons (like Chicago), to smaller, more intimate marathons. This was of the smaller variety. My comments echo those of other runners. The last several miles of the marathon were just plain dangerous. The rain, combined with running through yards, around unassembled piers, through landscaping, and with no organized support in the last several miles made for a difficult finish (marathons are tough enough at the end without these other factors). No one can control the weather, but the race director could have made better use of the volunteers that they did to help out at the end of the course. At one point between miles 24 and 25, I wasn't even sure I was still on the course. This course was the most scenic of all of the marathons I have run, and on a non-rainy day, the hazards at the end probably would not have seemed as bad as they did. If I were to ever run this race again, I would make sure the weather is going to be good THAT DAY, and then do same-day registration. Nice attempt at a decent marathon, but definitely room for improvement. Next month: Grandma's Marathon in Duluth, MN Last month: Lakeshore Marathon, Chicago
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 18, 2002

Change the Course!

The course was scenic and the country running was fun. Only one serious defect: the last few miles of the course were not well marked, had poor footing (paving stones, etc.), and obstacles. We ran across people's yards! Probably will not run it again unless the course is changed.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 16, 2002

More organization please

I ran the 25k portion of this race this year (2002) and I can echo most of the comments from other runners that have already been posted. My particular complaint involves the finish for the 25 k. Three of the races, the marathon, euro-marathon, and 25 k all converge near the finish for the 25 k race. Poor signage for the finish led me to miss the end and over run the course with longer race runners, by about a quarter of a mile, having to cut back through parking lots and playgrounds to get to the finish line. The course itself was very scenic, but very lonely.
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 13, 2002

Miles 21-23 a crime against the sport

Miles 21-23 MUST be changed to ensure safety of runners. Aid stations were spaced dangerously far apart for that stage of the race, surfaces varied from grass to mud to garden paver stones, path was blocked with unassembled piers, and the presence of any humans, let alone fans or safety support personnel, was nearly nonexistent. Had you an injury during that stretch, you may have had 1-2 miles to walk for ANY sort of help. Weather is no one's fault, but the response to it must be improved if runners' safety is of any priority. Forget the picturesque mansions; runners need a good surface and help in those miles!
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 13, 2002

Scenic - nice people - poor transportation

Did the 25K run. Run was scenic - mostly rolling farmland. Volunteers were great. Route not always well marked - occasionally 'dodging' cars. Biggest problem - return from 25K to starting point - had one bus - waited about an hour in 45 degree / rainy weather after having run the 25K - not fun - should have run 2-3 busses. Not many spectators but enthusiastic - weather didn't help.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 11, 2002

Not a marathon I'd recommend to anyone.

This race has a lot of areas which need improvement. There was no traffic control and many times we were running out in the open where we could have been prime targets for drivers who were not paying attention. After the 25K ended, the mile markers were non-existent. None of the volunteers at the water stations (what few there were) were accurate in their knowledge of where we were. The marathon course took us down to the lakefront path, which was not clearly marked and, at this time of the year, dangerous because all the homeowners have their equipment out ready to set up their piers. The course itself was very poorly marked and at times we were unsure if we were even on course. It was a horrible rainy day, which was obviously no one's fault, but all the above didn't help the situation. The areas marked for the restrooms had only one porta potty apiece!! All in all, a bad experience!!!!!!!!
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: January 15, 2002

great course, solid support and organization

My thoughts on the beauty and hilliness of the course echo those below. Regarding support and organization, as a runner in 2001, I experienced none of the complaints mentioned by the 2000 runner, and thought it a very well run, small race with plenty of aid. One other note: The start is concurrent with the other, shorter-distance racers, so don't get caught up in the pacing of a 10k-er! Most of the racers you are with at the start are running the shorter races. Fans are supportive, although understandably sparse.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 13, 2001

Very Low Key, scenic, challenging

I ran the 2001 version of the race. First the negatives: the price ($40.00) seemed a bit steep for a course which featured minimal traffic control and some unstaffed aid stations. And, there was a 1.5 mile (2.4 km) stretch along the shoulder of a moderately busy highway (there were cones, but these cones were almost on the gravel). But: 1) this race offered chip timing; hence almost instant results 2) there were several races to choose from (5K, 10K, 25K, 22 mile cross country race) in addition to the marathon 3) the course was the prettiest I've ever seen and 4) the course was just plain interesting. There were hills, an occasional flat spot, pristine wooded areas, a golf course, an observatory, lush, green farm land, sleepy neighborhoods, small towns and some scenic lake-front areas. In addition, the last 1.2 miles (2K) were on paths and trails around Lake Geneva. Yes, there were hills and most of these came after the 25K mark (where that race ended). So, pace yourself well, and don't be decieved at the first part of the course! It gets harder. If you like being coddled, this is NOT the race for you. Traffic control is minimal (but adequate), some of the aid stations are unstaffed (but the aid stations were more than adequate; one every 2-3 miles) and spectators were sparse ( but very enthusiastic). But, if you enjoy a challenge and the company of friendly but competitive runners, you'll love this race. Three notes: there were finisher's medals at this race and I thought that they were good ones. The post race pasta/salad meal was good, and the race made arrangements at the local Y for use of the showers. ollie
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: April 07, 2001

Great course, but you gotta do your hill work

This is a very scenic course in a beautiful portion of southern Wisconsin. If you enjoy running along a lake and out into the countryside with dairy farms & rolling hills, you'll love the first sixteen miles. However, if you neglect some serious hill work in your pre-marathon training, you'll probably be cursing yourself on the challenging hills leading up to Yerkes Observatory. Lake Geneva can definitely be a fun midwestern marathon if you've prepared well.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: March 31, 2001

Always a great time, Always tough!

I have always run the 25k which starts with the marathon. The city, sights, accommodations and restaurants of the area make it great for the family. If you can run the 25k your ready for any marathon to follow. A great training run. If you got the energy you can keep going for the marathon, if your in the marathon and can't you can stop at the 25k. Either way the sweat shirt is great! After 6 runs, I look forward to this every May I can get to it. Its hilly and challenging. Hats off to the marathon finishers of this one. That is one of my goals.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 29, 2000

Spectacular Course, Unspectacular Organization

Lake Geneva offers a remarkable range of topography as the course winds along the beautiful lake, through the picturesque rural dairyland, and up and down some remarkable hills before returning to the lake. The organizers featured adequate support at aid stations every 2-3 miles during the first 15 miles (shared with the 25-K runners), but during the last ten miles of the 5-13-00 event two of the aid stations were unstaffed for mid-pack and back-of-the-pack runners. A garden hose thrown over a metal chair provided the only aid at mile 20 at the Yerkes Observatory! Bottom line: Of the ten marathons I've run as a mid-pack runner, Lake Geneva offered some of the finest scenery but, regrettably, the worst organization. Sorry, I won't be back to this one.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 17, 2000

Grueling hills, no traffic and lots of head winds.

Course starts at lake level and repeatedly climbs and then drops you back to lake level. Hills get longer and steeper after 16 miles. Generally no traffic to deal with. Only 175 runners do the full marathon, so there is plenty of room to run. The 2000 race had 25 mph winds out of the west. About 6 miles were directly into this wind and for only 2 miles did we have the wind at our back. Very difficult, but rewarding marathon.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 14, 2000

Beautiful course

Fantastic course (rolling hills) around the lake, great sweatshirt, unfortunately no medals.
4.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide