By: Just A R.
Posted: December 12, 2023
Are marathons no longer organized by runners?
Whoever came up with this course is clearly not someone who has run or cares about marathons. The most egregious fault in this course is having faster marathoners merge into an enclosed trail that is being blocked by slow half marathoners, 12.2 miles in. Once on the trail a faster marathoner is stuck. There is nowhere to get around the slower half marathoners. One almost has to push through them. For those trying to qualify for Boston or New York, that could easily be the reason they did not qualify.
Another major problem is 11th Ave E just after leaving Interlaken Blvd. It is a super steep downhill on a rough road 11 miles into the marathon. Never mind the frost we had that day.
Also the course involves two loops around Greenlake. The second loop is on the inner path among people not involved with the marathon, including families walking in groups, strollers, some cyclists. It is not a wide path.
I have done the Seattle Marathon more than 10 times. It used to be a great course. The organization was stellar. They even had someone at each mile yelling the time to marathoners. Now they are taking liberties in denying basic expectations to marathoners, such as the ability to run uninterrupted.
I suspect it has to do with organizers keeping more of the money for themselves, by paying less to the city for a proper course, and providing a marathon that does not meet basic standards every marathoner expects.
By: Michael C.
Posted: January 09, 2023
A Big Disappointment
The race hotel was 4 miles from the start and finish lines. With no transportation between the two. Crazy, right? The crazier thing is that in Seattle where rain is common, the RD decided it would be a good idea to have the new course go through WETLANDS. The recent and unexpected rains meant having to actually balance yourself on three wooden planks to cross shin deep puddles. It was insane. And oh yeah, the runner tracking system as promised never worked. The tracking company says the RD did not give information to them in time. This race has just become a money grab. Never again.
By: Scott K.
Posted: December 01, 2022
Nice race but had problems
Sponsored by Nuun but forgot to provide it for 90% of the race. Every support table from miles 7-24 only had water. No GUs provided on course even though it was specified on the course map. Miles 13-16 on a bridge /causeway. No fluid station but that was known. Then fluids and turnaround and then mile 16-19 back over bridge without fluids.
Then a trail around mile 20. Covered with lots of leaves which could be a fall risk since stones and twigs were hidden underneath. One section with 3 planks to cover mud. Try crossing planks with tired legs and multiple runners bouncing up and down. Hills were expected. The trail was unexpected.
Finished at the University of Washington stadium. Also where the start is. Nice place to wait before race. But it is 3 miles from the host hotel. Finish line on the field is a nice touch. Finishing nutrition and the top of the stairs of the stadium not the best thing after running 26.2 miles.
Course was well marked. 3 bridge crossings means very little spectators. It was also 38 degrees so might have had an effect. Nice shirt and medal. Course was well marked. Long time limit of 8 hours. Pace groups were only up to 4 hours 20 minutes so slower run/walkers had no pacers. Combined with half marathoners later in race but groups of walkers on narrow paths made it harder to pass. Also some parks were open so bikers would zoom past without telling us to move to the side a little.
No comment yet from the race director about the missing electolyte fluid replacement. I am curious what happened.
By: Roy H.
Posted: December 04, 2019
Average Marathon - Nothing overly special
We flew from Milwaukee the day prior and stayed at the host hotel, The Westin. Nice hotel with a great location. Marathon expo was average for an event this size. Got my packet and got out rather quick.
The day of the race was perfect weather conditions. There were no corrals but everyone seemed to line up accordingly. The beginning of the race ran about a mile down 5th avenue before turning onto an on ramp. We stayed on this freeway until about mile 5 or 6 and then it was a LONG out and back on a small/paved trail. When I say long, we were on this trail until about mile 18. The only thing to see was the University of Washington. After we were done with the trail, the race took us through Gas Works park which was really the one other thing worth seeing on the course. Mile 22 marker came along and it was a MAJOR uphill that went for over a mile. After that, it was pretty much downhill and back to the city. The finish line was in a stadium. Post race food was some of the worst I have ever seen at a full marathon. They had bananas and fruit cups and that was all I could find. Quickly took the bus back to the hotel.
This was my 15th marathon and 14th state. Comparing this event to the others, I rank it somewhere in the middle to bottom. Nothing special but nothing really bad.
The wife and I stayed an extra 2 nights to check out all the Seattle attractions. This is what made the runcation worth it! Seattle is an AWESOME city with lots to do. We had a great time!
By: Sarah M.
Posted: December 01, 2019
Super Disappointing Event
This was my 26th different marathon. Ranks second from the bottom. I am really disappointed. The course is boring- several miles along I-5 and then many miles out and back along a bike path. A few loops around parking lots and random spaces that just seemed silly. Worse- such few aid stations!!! Not 14 as advertised. Miles 3, 7, then every 3-ish miles. They didn't have a lot of volunteers. Ran out of Gatorade (I finished in 3:32 for reference).
Positives - logistics are super easy. Several hotels in easy walking distance from start and finish. Great weather this year- dry and low 40s and no wind! Really nice volunteers at finish.
Also - City didn't seem to know the race was going on. Zero mention on the local news. I expected the local weather forecaster to mention it. Nope.
By: Reinhard S.
Posted: December 03, 2017
Convenient, friendly, and beautiful
Since this has been my first Seattle marathon I can only comment on the 2017 course, and I loved it. Sure, the rolling hills at the Arboretum impacted me mentally, and I had to walk those, but overall and in hindsight, the hills were manageable. I loved the mix of running in downtown and residential areas, and lots and lots of nature. Finishing inside a stadium has always been a highlight for me.
The expo and race itself were easy to get to if you stayed at a downtown hotel. No waiting around, no rush, even no lines at the porta potties since the half marathoners had left by then. Better signage for out-of-towners, actually any signage, would be appreciated, as it was quite challenging to find the bag drop at the start, and even more so, after the finish.
Not too many spectators (due to the weather I suppose) for which I would give 3 stars, however, there was this one cheerful person who recognized me (and my shirt in particular) at four different locations along the course, and clearly deserves 5 stars from me. Hence, my 4 star rating overall. The logistics behind that stunt must have been impressive! Great job!
Overall a very nice, relaxed, and friendly race that I would recommend to anyone.
By: Gary R.
Posted: December 01, 2017
Hilly Course, But Worth it!
I have to admit the first 5-6 miles sucked; just when you thought you had a little relief another monster hill was in front of you. It's not an ideal way to start a race, but if you put the training in like you should it won't demolish you. The beauty of the course shines. It was almost magical in many instances, seeing pollen fall off the branches as you ran through Seward Park, or watching the gorgeous fall leaves descend from their branches due to the weight of rain drops. The course is, indeed, challenging, but it's soooo worth the effort and training. I will undoubtedly be doing this race again.
By: Neil K.
Posted: November 28, 2017
New course for 2017!
The course, that had been the same for about 10 years, had to be changed because the I-90 express lanes are being converted to light rail. So, instead of going through the tunnel under Mt Baker, you had to go over it. This added two significant hills in the first 5 miles of an already hilly course, so you should not expect to PR.
Now, the hills were expected, so no complaints there. However, there were a couple of disappointing aspects to the new course. First, was the choice to use the I-90 trail from mile 2.5-4. This was very narrow in places and was about where the marathoners caught up to the walkers, which made pacing a challenge. Second, because too much distance was needed to get to Lake Washington, they had to remove the iconic Galer/Madison hill and replace it with two dinky out-and-backs.
The course is beautiful and the event is well organized. As it stands, it's worth running once and I'm happy I did it, but I'll wait to see course updates before doing it again.
By: Kevin R.
Posted: November 27, 2017
Beautiful views and excellent support crew.
Great spacing of water/Gatorade/GU stations. Volunteers were exceptionally helpful and selflessly supportive throughout the race. Couldn't have made it to the end with out the support crew at each booth. Spectator spots were nicely spaced and critical to pushing through. Beautiful views of Lake Washington and downtown sprinkled throughout. As a novice, the last 3 inclines were brutal and it was hard to gauge progress for miles 21 and 22 as I couldn't find these markers along the way. A memorable homestretch through South Lake Union up Mercer and into the stadium. Nice and warm recovery area. A positive first marathon.
By: Frank G.
Posted: November 28, 2016
A good fall marathon in the Pacific Northwest
If you're looking for a fall marathon in the Pacific Northwest, choose Seattle over Portland. The Seattle Marathon course is more scenic than Portland's and the course distance is accurate.
The weather was not too bad. The rain stopped just before the start of the race and stayed dry for over 4 hours. Good organization.
By: Charllie P.
Posted: November 29, 2015
Foggy, frosty and fun
I came to Seattle for the Apple Cup and stayed to run the Seattle Marathon. This is a good local marathon. The half marathon field is big, which gives this event a big race feeling.
The Expo was good. Race day organization was great from start to finish. They really treat the runners well. The course is challenging. Come prepared to run hills. The race day weather was foggy and frosty.
By: Vic B.
Posted: April 18, 2015
Still waiting for age-group award
I ran the 5K that was part of the marathon and placed in my age group. There was no one around after the finish to ask about things. There weren't even any signs to direct us to inside, where the post-race food was. Poor planning. I've emailed three separate times about my age-group award. The first time I received a reply that it would be mailed to me in a few weeks. No replies from second or third emails, although I received a receipt confirmation. It's now four months and counting. I don't care so much about the award. It's now about the principle. Not replying is showing total disrespect for a runner. I would not recommend this race to anybody because of how they treat runners.
By: Carl G.
Posted: December 11, 2014
Unusually cold day. Still a good race
The 2014 Seattle Marathon was one of the colder races that I have run. Start time temperature was below freezing. I ran the race in running pants, three layers on top, gloves and a beanie that I bought at the expo.
By: Roger Macmillan
Posted: December 03, 2014
6th time for this one, Well organized
Great job by the organizing committee, from the package pickup to the finish, the weather was cold with a brisk wind, but the recovery area is indoors and very warm, with lots of food etc.The course is not too tough, a few short hills after about 20 miles. I will be back
By: John W.
Posted: December 01, 2014
VERY GOOD HALF MARATHON EXCEPT FOR
My wife and I came to Seattle to run the half and are very glad we did. The course was great with a nice mix of city and groomed trail type running. The organization was great and the expo far exceeded our expectations. The course lacked spectators but the volunteers were great. The only problem was the carbo load dinner. It was terrible on many different ways: the pasta was cold and not drained properly. They also ran out 20 minutes in and resorted to all wheat pasta that was undercooked. The room also ran out of table settings and did not replace the silverware forcing people to have to sit at a used spot. The waitress also stated one time through the buffet line which was a joke as they never had a fully stocked line. Lastly they had no speaker or entertainment. Not sure if the Westin or the Marathon should be blamed, probably both. All this for $24 a head. Avoid the dinner and you will have a great experience.
By: Moises S.
Posted: December 01, 2013
Good race. OK weather.
I've run the Seattle Marathon a few times. Organization is consistently good.
The race is held on Thanksgiving weekend, so don't expect great weather. Race day was windy but no rain. The start time temperature was near fifty degrees; and I ran the race in shorts, a long sleeve tee, and a running vest.
The course is scenic, especially along Lake Washington and the arboretum. The course is also hilly. The hills begin after mile 20. One hill is really steep.
Few spectators along the course. Plenty of volunteers at the water stations.
By: Jan T.
Posted: December 05, 2012
Great place to combine a holiday plus a run
We decided to make the Seattle Marathon our Thanksgiving family reunion destination and we were not disappointed. We flew/took the train to Seattle, took light rail to the Westin, and voila, the downtown unfolded in full holiday spirit. The 5K was fun, and the marathon was foggy, damp, breezy and scenic. Running out to the tunnel was wild, and the finish through the aboretum was gorgeous. My husband ran a marathon PR. I would rate this course above par for an urban event, and the whole weekend of tying it to Thanksgiving was wonderful.
By: Roger Macmillan
Posted: November 26, 2012
I will be back
This race is very well organized, lots of water and aid stations, great volunteers marshaling. The course is a great mix of road and trails through some beautiful park areas. The recovery area had a great supply of food, especially the chicken noodle soup, and the results were available almost immediately after the finish of the race. A pat on the back to the race director and his staff.
By: Andrew D.
Posted: November 26, 2012
Great race - sucky food for the full
As long as you understand this is Seattle in November and that means probably cold, possibly rain and lots of hills you will enjoy the actual race. You get to run out and back on the floating bridge, up the lake front and through the arboretum to end with a view across the city. The views are almost enough to distract you from the hills that come in the last 6 miles
Medal was pretty nice this year (2012) too.
However due to course logistics the half runners start (and therefore end) well before the full which means the end of race food is decimated for all but the marathon winners. Half marathoners fill bags, kids take snacks and some families stock up for lunches for the week.... after 6 years of emails to the race director without a response its clear this won't change. So pack yourself a snack - your $100+ fee isn't enough to pay for bagels...
By: Tony S.
Posted: November 26, 2012
Great course, medal and shirt get one star
It was my first time in the city. The course was beautiful and challenging enough. I finished on the slow side and the only thing left in the recovery area was water, bananas and hot chocolate, this was disappointing after being told repeatedly on the course that there would be pizza and plenty of food. Shirt was advertised to be Saucony, it was some cheap brand. Medal is ridiculously small and underwhelming. Bottom line, the course delivered, but the swag did not.
By: Keith Wilson
Posted: November 26, 2012
Looking for a lesson from this
I ran 26.2 miles in Seattle yesterday in 2:39. Unfortunately I had to run 2.5 more because I'd made a wrong turn, which I realized the second time I passed the 13.1 mark. I had made a left back into the crowd, assuming I was supposed to join back with the half-marathoners. It turned out I was supposed to make a right, which I did the second time. I accept responsibility for making this mistake, but it is incredibly frustrating knowing I would have been in the top five finishers. I don't mean to make complaints. I mean to suggest having someone stand in that spot and point into the correct direction. What may seem obvious didn't seem so obvious in that moment.
By: Morgan M.
Posted: November 25, 2012
A good race experience
After the NYC Marathon was cancelled, I was looking for another marathon to run. I chose the Seattle Marathon. I was a little hesitant to run it since I just ran Rock 'n' Roll Seattle earlier in June. It turned out to be a good choice.
The Seattle Marathon has a totally different atmosphere than a Rock 'n' Roll race. This event is put on by a local, volunteer organization. It is a medium size race with about two thousand runners. The two races are similar in a couple of ways. First, both races start and finish at the Seattle Center. Second, both courses run on the floating bridge and go down to Seward Park. Despite the similarities, the Seattle Marathon has a better course. It travels through a different part of the city and is more scenic.
Race day organization was good. The Center House was open prior to the start so runners could stay warm. The marathon start was separate from the bigger half marathon race. Course support is first rate with plenty of volunteers at the aid stations. The only reason I didn't give it five stars was the Recovery Area. Non-runners (friends and family) were in the Recovery Area and helping themselves to food meant for finishers.
The weather was cool and foggy, almost ideal running weather. The hills were challenging and slowed me down. Not many spectators along the course, but those who came out were supportive.
Overall it was a good race experience.
By: Lukas C.
Posted: March 21, 2012
This race is rad.
The Seattle Marathon is a great race for a runner of any level. There aren't too many people which gives a mediocre runner a legitimate chance to compete.
The course is very scenic and mostly flat. Yes, there are a few ups and downs and one moderate, but manageable uphill around mile 21. If you do your hill training like you're supposed to, this course is cake. I mean, what fun would a marathon be if it was completely flat? If you want a PR, expect a PR.
There are fans everywhere and everyone is super enthusiastic.
It is very well organized. The expo is huge. The post race food was perfect and plentiful - just don't expect a meal. The shirts are really cool and very comfortable. The design is simple and not too flashy.
Overall, I'd give the Seattle Marathon a 10 out of 10 if I were to rate it. I highly recommend it to anyone. I plan on racing Seattle every year for years to come. Come on down next Thanksgiving to run around the most beautiful city in America!
By: Mary B.
Posted: January 24, 2012
A very well-organized race!
I enjoyed this race despite the rain because of its organization. There were plenty of bathrooms, aid stations, and plenty of GU. I especially enjoyed the fact that they were using bottled water and weren't filling up cups with a hose like other races.
The Kids Marathon was awesome and my kids can't wait to run again next year. Good job guys!
I only have two suggestions for next year. One-Please have more food available for late finishers. Those of us who were on the course for a longer time needed more than a cold bagel. I was thinking about the advertised chicken noodle soup during the last few miles of the race and was disappointed when there was none. Two- I would seriously consider using a different company for the sports massages. My massage was the worst ever and they were not very eager to work.
I can't wait to run in 2012.
By: Mike D.
Posted: December 09, 2011
A very good race
This is an absolutely great race. It is well organized, has a great EXPO, both the EXPO, start and finish lines , are convenient, and course is great The run takes you through downtown Seattle, across a floating bridge to Mercer Island, along Lake Washington for about 10 miles through some very upscale neighborhoods, and lovely parks. The end is at the 50 yard line of a high school stadium. At times it is hard to believe you are major metropolitan area. One steep hill is at mile one and miles 22-24 have very sharp hills. The fan support is lacking, but volunteers are very enthusiastic. The only negative is Seattle weather is cold, wet, and windy in late fall; therefore, be forewarned. I seriously considered running the RnR LV race rather than Seattle. I am very thankful for my decision. Just bundle up for the weather and enjoy the run.
By: Thomas B.
Posted: November 28, 2011
Great race, consistent quality
I ran my second Seattle Marathon yesterday. The race has been consistent in its course and its qaulity of organization.
The goods of this race: the logistics are easy, the start/finish are well organized, the course is interesting (specifically if the weather is good), and the temperature is consistently good for running.
The bads: there are few spectators, the runners are often rained upon (sometimes hard), and miles 21-23 require significant hill climbs.
I love this race but the course is backloaded. I was passed by hundreds during the first several miles but, in the last 7 miles, there were lots of folks who were struggling with the hills. It is definitely something to plan for in your training long runs.
All in all, a great run. I am not sure it is worth traveling to Seattle for this race because the weather is consistently bad in November but it is a great home town race.
By: Ben R.
Posted: November 27, 2011
2011: Wet, Cold, & Windy!
Ran the full marathon today in Seattle. It was was wet, cold, and windy. The course is fairly flat until mile 20 or so... there are small hills, but nothing over 100 feet. After 20 miles, you are constantly either going up or going down. The first serious hill (Galer St). is a shocker; its only a block, but it's steep! The hardest part however was rounding Capitol Hill and facing a strong headwind and driving rain on the last three miles to the finish; that was more will-breaking than the hills.
There weren't quite as many water stations as I would have liked, but it wasn't bad, and the volunteers were super friendly. I think they listened to the comments on marathonguide.com about the food after the race: when I finished at 4+ hours, there was plenty of food of all kinds left, and the recovery area was heated (yay!) and not that crowded (yay!). Mmmm... chocolate milk. Hot cocoa. Fresh bagels. Bananas. Water.
I was surprised at how few people ran it compared to Portland. There are huge crowds for the half, but only 1300 people or so finished the full.
I'll certainly run it again, but I'll wear a hydration pack and train harder for the hills at 20+ miles.
By: Angela S.
Posted: April 20, 2011
Great race but pitiful recovery area
I have completed the Seattle 1/2 Marathon 4 times now. The 2010 event had a great course and wonderful volunteers. This one lacked in one major area though. I can't believe after finishing the 1/2 that there was next to NO food in the recovery area. The only thing I saw was a little Campbells soup and some bananas. I have been to much smaller events in which the amount and type of food in the recovery area was well thought out. They had plenty for the amount of participants. I'm not sure what happened to the food organization at the Seattle Marathon, but it was the worst recovery experience I've ever had. Hopefully this years will be better. How about some bagels, bread, cookies, or fruit - the standard stuff?
By: bert l.
Posted: December 13, 2010
A must marathon
Good organization, breathtaking scenery, and great shirt, though there was a somewhat weak post-race spread, and the software leaves much to be desired from what is thought of as IT country (race results are not searchable except for name, there are no age groups that I can find, no states or stuff that I am used to, and overall results were posted by gun time rather than chip time). I would go back in a heartbeat if and when I finish my 50 states.
By: Seth D.
Posted: December 08, 2010
Very Scenic
Forget doing a PR. Forget running your best time; the course is much too hilly for that. But take it easy and enjoy an beautiful run past parks, trees, waterfront, city center - and just enjoy. I cannot remember a prettier race that I have run in recent memory. The course goes from the downtown to the waterfront, to a floating bridge, to park, to an arboretum, and hills with views of the city that should not be missed. Run this race; enjoy Seattle. The expo was perfect, the organization first-class, the size of the field just right, and the city a charm.
Seattle was great. The city is really nice. The weather, while not ideal, is not as bad as people like to say. On race day we did get lucky, having ideal running weather, but even if it had not been ideal, the city and the course are not to be missed.
By: Brad N.
Posted: December 05, 2010
Nice course; listen to feedback on organization
Seattle has a great course. Weather was just below 40, with no rain and no wind. November in Seattle just doesn't get any better!
What needs to be done better?
1) Pasta feed was a joke: $25 for one walk-through a line that had pasta tubes and salad.
2) Long-sleeve shirts are nice, but the logo ruined them. Really, this is Seattle, the home to the most creative people in the country.
3) "Where is my stuff again? I'm freezing...." I was surprised to see the bag drop-stuff was not moved to the other side. Additionally, there was no signage at the finish to direct you that way. Once you did find it you had to walk the stadium steps to find it.
Nice job on the actual course: Water stations, first aid and GU. Great volunteers!
By: Bill Chalk
Posted: December 04, 2010
I love the varied scenery in this course
Ok, I ran the half not the full, but this comments page doesn't have an option for that. I like the Seattle Half better than the full because of the high probability of cold wet weather. I can put up with 1:38 of any weather, but being out there for a minimum of 3:35 (and maybe longer) doesn't appeal to me. What I like about the Seattle course (half or full) is the variation in scenery. You never get bored because it keeps changing - from cityscape, to freeway, to tunnel, to lake, to arboretum... and who doesn't love Interlaken? In the full you get to add the floating bridge and the "flat" lake section down to Seward Park and back. They've improved the bag check too, from the old days where you had to climb the bleachers in the stadium unless you could snag a boyscout volunteer to run up there and get your bag. And the recovery area is indoors.
Things I don't like about the Seattle Marathon: Having to listen to the national anthem (twice) sung by a Mariah Carey wannabe. What happened to the old days when you just plain sang the anthem and put your hand on your heart? Oh well; American Idol seems to ruin everything good. Not much else to beef about. Well, food in the recovery area was a bit slim this year. No salty soup (long gone are the days of Ivors clam soup) and weak coffee (really? In Seattle?). And I know from previously running the marathon that even this food can disappear by the time 7,000 halfers get through with it. Maybe they save some now and don't bring it out until later. Hope so.
Otherwise, the Seattle Marathon is great experience and I look forward to it every year. It's not a PR course - don't let anyone tell you it is. It's too narrow for the first 3 miles to go fast without burning up energy passing lots of other runners. The hills knock time off your pace and it's twisty in places. So don't expect a PR; just be happy with what you get, and enjoy it.
By: Chemily C.
Posted: December 02, 2010
Lovely day for a marathon in 2010
Lucked out on the weather (only dry day of the week! and not too cold). The scenery was beautiful in the parks and the hills in the last 6 miles were tough but I guess we were warned that it would be a rolling course. My only complaint is that the ankle band for the timing chip nearly cut my foot off (a slight exaggeration of course but the material was rather rough).Pperhaps long socks would help.
By: Rebecca D.
Posted: November 30, 2010
Loved it, but...
I have to love this race because I ran it very well and I do believe that the course is highly PR-able. The on-course support was great in terms of plenty of aid stations and medical tents (thanks to UWMC). HOWEVER. Organizers need to revamp some details and apparently haven't been listening to criticism for years. The expo sucked - I had to wait in line for 20 minutes to get up the escalator into the ballroom. Have it somewhere bigger than a hotel. Recovery area was even worse - I finished in the top third of marathoners, and if there was more food available other than bananas and canned chicken noodle soup, it was gone by the time I came in. Bagels? Carbohydrates of some sort? Don't let spectators clear out the food that the runners NEED. Just a few ideas. Also, the first aid station was needlessly early and created a choke point. Push that one back or dispense with it altogether.
By: Scott S.
Posted: November 29, 2010
Overall OK in 2010...
I ran this for the first time in 2008 and the experience in 2010 was about the same, except I was 25+ minutes faster. I prepared for the rolling course that has a few rather steep sections and so was OK in that respect. The weather was great - between about 38-39 F and low to mid 40s. A few too many turns in some places for my liking but the scenery was solid. As usual, a mass of runners went out too fast at first. I started near the 3:10 pacer (and finished a bit slower than that), but was passed in the first mile by hundreds. Seemingly more than most races that I do (and it seems I spend the rest of the race passing the majority of them). Nonetheless, there were some good, flat sections, and a fair bit in wooded areas, which I liked.
Crowd support was good enough for me (I'm low maintenance in this regard anyways). The expo was fair, the food at the end fair (although I can't fathom why the chocolate milk people ran out of chocolate milk so fast, considering that I finished by 11:30 a.m.). Oh wait - I got confused. This is really the Seattle HALF Marathon (over 7,610 runners starting at 7:30 a.m.) - not really the Seattle Marathon (only about 2,340 runners starting at 8:15 a.m.). Looking at the half marathon results, I can see that over 7,500 half marathoners were chowing down in the recovery area (if they went there) ahead of me. Perhaps other food vendors had packed up before the bulk of marathoners arrived? A minor annoyance, I suppose. Seattle Center is a good place to hang out if your hotel is close and you're not heading out of town immediately.
By: Dan A.
Posted: November 29, 2010
Mixed Review
After looking at the simplicity of the shirt design and the lack of food in the recovery area, I found this race to be very expensive for what you got. I found the course to be challenging, but a scenic way to see the various sides of Seattle. However, due to running on highways, in tunnels, alongside Lake Washington and through the arboretum, there were very few spectators. It was fitting though to see all the supporters with their coffee to go in hand.
By: Dave M.
Posted: November 29, 2010
Great Course, Perfect Weather, Bad Recovery Set
I did the 2010 Seattle Marathon, my first Seattle Marathon. Perfect weather (37 degrees at the start, 44 degress at the finish, no wind or rain). The course is fantastic along Lake Washington and the floating bridge; for an out-and-back legged course, it is very nice. It is mainly flat, with a few small inclines and declines, until (as noted before) mile 20 when the hills come into play. I was paced at 10 minutes/mile until then. Finished at 4:30. The clothing check is very easy and nicely located at the start; however, when I finished at the west end of Memorial Stadium (a nice place to finish), and followed the signs to the "Recovery Area," I expected that my clothes would be there. But they were still back at the east end, so I have to go back out to the stadium field and up the stairs to get my clothes. Not a real major thing, but still, my legs were tired after the run.
I will definitely do this again. I came from Tacoma; I took the #594 bus from the Tacoma Dome at 5:30, and it let me off less than a mile from the start around 6:15.
By: Michael O.
Posted: November 28, 2010
A good marathon
The Seattle Marathon is a race that is easily overlooked, since it takes place on Thanksgiving weekend. I've run this race several times and like it for many reasons.
First, the size of this marathon is just right. Only a couple of thousand runners. Not too large and not too small. Second, regardless of the hills, the course is scenic. Lastly, the organization is solid. From packet pick-up to race-day course support, the race experience went smoothly.
This year's weather was chilly and dry, and the sun came out later in the race. Good volunteer support on the course and at the finish. The race shirt was a big improvement over last year's quality (Saucony) tech shirt - nice color and design.
By: Tyson Poskochil
Posted: May 05, 2010
Some things good, others...
I enjoyed the scenery of downtown Seattle and the various neighborhoods, parks, and bodies of water the course took me through. I was not ready for the series of hills at the end of the race, which is exactly when you don't need them. I did appreciate the splitting of groups into four waves of runners at the beginning, which is a good logistical strategy. Temps were bit on the cooler side, which made me keep my a jacket on for almost the entire time, so something to keep in mind for this time of year. Medal was simple but very nice, and I liked to see that half-marathoners received the same-size medal (only silver) as the marathoners. Expo also seemed a bit condensed in the given hotel space, as well as the post-race festivities at the finish. Overall, a good marathon experience, but not one I'd choose to do again.
By: Alan D.
Posted: January 12, 2010
Very enjoyable, not as hilly as expected
I was somewhat apprehensive going into this race with regard to (a) the hills, and (b) the potential for rain. Despite checking race reviews, course hill profiles, and talking to other runners, I just couldn't seem to get a good picture of how hilly this course really was. As it turned out, the hills were not so bad. I would estimate that a 3:30 marathoner could expect to add 5-7 minutes compared to a flat course. And the weather, fortunately, was nearly perfect marathon weather - cloudy, +10C (50F), and only a few drops of rain. The race was very well organized, had great volunteers, and a very good race expo; I actually bought some items, which is unusual for me! The race hotel was a bargain and, at the risk of starting a debate, I must say that I enjoyed downtown Seattle more than I enjoyed downtown Portland, Oregon in 2008. I will be back!
By: rural girl
Posted: December 07, 2009
Beautiful Course
This was my first Seattle Marathon, and I will definitely do it again. The course was scenic, the mile markers were easy to find on the sides of port-a-potties, and the road closures and volunteers were great. My only disappointment was the lack of food and the fight to get to it in the recovery area. Too crowded, and too little food. And you had to pay to get a finisher's shirt! What's up with that??
By: Rrrrrr B.
Posted: December 06, 2009
Not a bad race
The race was good; however, it was the first time that I was stopped mid-race to allow cars to pass. It was at the top of a hill, though, so the forced break may have been a blessing.
The shirts were a horrible design, but that's fine my me since I try to look as ugly as possible when I run.
Scenic route. Minimal but enthusiastic fan support.
Getting food at the end of the race was almost impossible - WAY too crowded. We just left and went to a local restaurant.
By: Linda F.
Posted: December 05, 2009
Still needs improvement
I have run the half marathon almost yearly since 2003, and the marathon once; and for the most part, I love it. But I have learned to do without available porta-potties, especially at the start. The other rough edges that never have been fixed are:
1. Easier access to the baggage drop (who wants to climb stairs in a stadium to retrieve items?)
2. As usual, there is no food left over for the slower half marathoners (let alone the marathoners) at the finish because every year they let families take the refreshments meant for the runners.
By: Josh O.
Posted: December 02, 2009
Beautiful course, crappy t-shirt, greedy runners
This course is just amazing. It really shows off the city!
The shirts are horrible!
My wife ran the half, and said that there were people loading up boxes of the post-race food; she couldn't believe they were allowing it. By the time I was done there was hardly anything left. I bet that shortly after I finished there wasn't anything at all. They should not let families and friends of the runners in the post-race area... it gets too crowded and they steal the goodies meant for runners.
By: Cordelie W.
Posted: December 01, 2009
Gorgeous course, but logistics could be improved
This course was BEAUTIFUL! It's wonderful to be able to run along the lake and through the arboretum, without forgetting that you're in a big city. It was also nice near the end of the race to have a landmark like the Space Needle that you're running toward! Be prepared for the STEEP hill at ~20.5. I liked finishing in Memorial Stadium, plus it was a nice surface for sore legs!
Suggestions for improvement:
-The walkers really congested the roads for the runners. The early water stations were especially congested, which would have been very problematic if I had wanted water in the first fourth of the race!
-Who on earth thought it was a good idea to make everyone climb up bleachers after the race to get to the bag check!?! Ouch.
-Would have been nice to have more music or "spirit stations" along the course to re-energize the runners.
-The medals were small and unimpressive compared to those at other marathons I've run.
-I like the bright turquoise shirt color, but the design is sort of boring.
By: Carson P.
Posted: November 29, 2009
A quality race
I ran my first half marathon at Rock 'n' Roll Seattle earlier in the summer. I enjoyed my time in this city so much that I came back to run the Seattle Marathon. The weather is a big concern with this race. Local runners told me it rained for most of the month, but the race weekend was overcast and dry. The start time temperature was a bit cool for this Californian, but I warmed up quickly. It turned out to be quite a comfortable day for a run.
There is a little overlap with the R'n'R course and this race, but this route is more scenic and definitely hillier. I liked the loop course with the start/finish at the Space Needle. The first couple of miles are in downtown. The rest are mostly in residential neighborhoods. I didn't mind the out-and-back on the bridge or down to Seward Park. The scenery along the lake is beautiful, even on a cloudy day. The hills between miles 20 and 22 will slow you down. Course support is okay. Well staffed aid stations, but be sure to use the bathroom before the race. There were lines at every porta-potty in the beginning.
Seattle has a good expo for a race of this size - much larger than I expected, with a good variety of booths. The free race shirt was OK: Tech fabric, interesting (green) color.
By: Steve S.
Posted: November 16, 2009
Not the best marathon
I think the biggest disappointment with this marathon was learning that so little of the money was going to the cause attached to it (maybe the children's hospital?). Otherwise the course was okay. I liked the challenge of the hills, but one hill was so brutal that everyone stopped to walk (I stupidly didn't). I grew up in the Seattle area and I know it's beautiful and thought this course lacked imagination. There were way too many out-and-backs. I felt the marathon could have showed off the city much better. I also didn't feel like it was good bang for the buck.
By: Adam Rose Rose
Posted: September 26, 2009
Beautiful City, Okay Race
I did the half-marathon. It rained like hell, and was chilly, but it was a fun run. It being my first race, I didn't know that finding a pacer at the start with a finish time would be a good idea, so I started near the back and was hopelessly stuck in a herd of slow runners. Lesson learned.
The mile markers were not well posted - some were low to the ground, and some might have been non-existent.... The chip didn't give me a halfway split, which is too bad because I know I had a better second half when the crowds thinned out.
The finish line is a mess. Not enough space, and then you have to walk up 50 stairs or something to get your belongings. The medal was ugly and the tech shirt was boring.
It's a beautiful course though, and goes quickly due to the diversity of the sights.
By: Andra L.
Posted: January 30, 2009
Really great race - not sure why more don't do it
This was my first Seattle Marathon. I thought the weather was perfect, if not a little too warm from where I'm used to training (but I wasn't complaining!). There may not be as many fans as other large races, but the volunteer support was fantastic. The course was pretty - I actually liked the out-and-back on the bridge and the lake path, and the foggy weather made it all the more beautiful. Of course, the hills at the end were tough, but that's where a lot of the fans were lined up and they really helped pull us through. Thanks to all of the folks from Bastyr who volunteered at the race finish to look over injuries.
Only two complaints: (1) The clothing drop-off bags were at the top of the stadium steps, which seemed like brutal punishment after 26.2 miles. Maybe the organizers wanted to help us keep those muscles moving for recovery, but I had to have a death grip on the railing to get back down the stadium stairs after picking up my bag, and it seemed a little unsafe. (2) What's up with the finisher shirts? The fabric was high quality, but the design was terrible. It was simply a white shirt with "Amica Insurance Seattle Marathon" printed in green just below the collar on the front. Weird. You would think they could design something more attractive and interesting? It's not a cheap race, after all.
All in all, it's a good race. Seattle has a lot of people and a lot of runners. I was surprised that this race didn't have more participants.
By: Alex P.
Posted: December 13, 2008
A fun way to work off the turkey
The Weather: The temperature was great - I didn't wear gloves and ran with one layer the entire time. As a Seattle native, I can say Seattle's rain isn't as prolific as the rumors would have you believe - usually it's just overcast and gray.
The Course: I think the course's reputation for being hilly is overrated. The only real hill you need to watch out for is in the 20-21 mile area. The course was well staffed with enthusiastic volunteers. The out-and-back section to Seward Park and on the I90 bridge came to be tedious, but were nice in the way it allowed you to see the elite runners up front. I also thought that the halfway point was about a quarter of a mile too soon. Dodging all the walkers, especially toward the end of the marathon, was a pain.
The Goodies: The shirt, while nice rather plain (white). The finisher's medal was nice, but simple compared to other big marathons - but we don't do marathons for the goodies, right?
By: David C.
Posted: December 04, 2008
A memorable 1st marathon.
The course had a good balance between few spectators on the land bridge and Seward Park and plenty on the actual streets. The pacers were not consistent as I stayed with the 4:45 group (4:00 was the next one up), and then they swapped pacers around the halfway mark. The fresh pacers then ran faster (perhaps to compensate for the hills towards the end). Also, I wasn't able to find details and meet the pacers beforehand at the expo even though it was listed as an event. Throughout the race there weren't enough portable toilets (e.g. 15 people standing in front of 1 toilet), and there were no GU gels leftover for the slower racers on both locations where there should've been.
By: Brandon L.
Posted: December 03, 2008
Nice route but lacking organization
This is the second time I have done this race. It is the only major race I have done, so maybe they are all this way and I am too picky. The race started in a very crowded intersection. I was warming up and headed to the starting area 10 minutes before the start. I could not get up to the start area and had to shove through spectators and climb a barrier to get onto the race route. Shortly after the start, I found myself dodging walkers while running the race. The rest of the race was fine; I had no complaints until the finish. I had to fight a crowd of finishers and spectators and walk uphill to the recovery area. In the recovery area, there was no place to sit; in the approximately 50 chairs that were set up, there were several non-running family members relaxing. It was hot and stuffy (not the race's fault - it was a balmy day) with no place to sit, and as soon as I grabbed a banana and a chocolate milk, I booked it out of there. I have run 10K's with 500 finishers that have a better recovery area, which was a little disappointing for our city.
Overall, it is a good run. If you are not concerned about the "accoutrements" of the race and arrive early for the start, you will have a good race.
It is a "hilly" race; I don't think "rolling" is quite the right term.
By: Mark G.
Posted: December 03, 2008
Washington off my list
I've set a goal of running 50 marathons in 50 states. This marathon was state number 5 and number 8 total for me. The course was great, though hilly at the end. The volunteers were helpful. My only complaint was that the first water station was out of cups - probably due to the fact that there were staggered starts for the half-marathon run and walk, and the marathon walk. Other than that, I had a great time running this marathon.
By: Jim M.
Posted: December 02, 2008
Worth doing but a few improvements suggested
Overall, this was a very nice marathon. We lucked out with good weather, especially considering the time of the year it is held.
The runner's expo was nice, but several of those staffing it, including at the information booth, did not know where some of the basic contacts were, including the pace team members.
I finally found someone to talk about the pace team, but they weren't able to answer why there were so few involved, and why the time spreads were so great, in my estimation. I understand the pacers were based on Boston Marathon qualifying times, but it would have been helpful just to have a few more.
I posed a similar question about the pace team via e-mail and telephone directly to the marathon office. While cordial, they were unable to provide much of an explanation for so few pacers involved.
As for the race: it was well organized, considering all of the different races and participants. However, one sizable challenge was dealing with the walkers who set out before us. Many would cover a lot of the road, which at times was fairly narrow. It left longer distance runners to have to bob and weave through the masses, taking precious energy away from the main objective.
I imagine those used to hills would be fairly comfortable during the last 10K, but this flat-lander really suffered (beware of going up Galer in particular).
One hiccup included no cups at the very first aid station. (People were drinking out of the pitchers.) Fortunately, all of the other aid stations were well stocked and had very supportive people.
The participation T-shirts were well made but bland, just like the finisher's medal.
On the positive side, the crowd that turned out was somewhat small but energetic, and the stadium finish was cool. Also, participants are able to get a printout of their race, which is a very detailed, three-page report!
I thought the event was very well run and worth doing, despite the issues noted.
By: Jennifer S.
Posted: December 01, 2008
Not My Favorite Race
This race was my 6th marathon event and by far the worst from an organizational standpoint. The starting area was not clearly marked as far as the location of the baggage check and even the start line. There was one speaker being used to announce which group was starting when and it clearly was not loud enough for everyone to hear. There were herds of people with no pace signs to line up with. As I started the 1/2 marathon I was running with 1/2 marathon and full marathon walkers. It is very frustrating to be in the start of a race and not have any clear organization.
The course: the course for this race is very beautiful. It is fairly hilly but that is something most people research before running. There are too many areas that bottleneck with people and also flow into traffic. The last thing a marathoner wants is to have to stop for 30 seconds for cars to go through.
Spectators: This is not a race to run if you are looking for constant cheering. Everyone that was out there was fabulous, but there is definitely a lack of people for what is supposed to be a major city! It would be fun to get the city of Seattle more involved in the race as far as teaming up with local companies, etc.
By: Shannon S.
Posted: December 01, 2008
Great first marathon!
This was my first full marathon and it was great. The course is indeed tough, but I had practiced on the hills from mile 20 on, and that really helped when it came time to run the actual race. The weather was PERFECT for running, although I agree that the fog obscured a lot of the scenery (it made running across I-90 really cool though!). I didn't have any major issues with the organization, the course, or the walkers. The expo was great and I am really glad I chose my hometown marathon as my first one. :) The volunteers and spectators were amazing!
By: Kirsten M.
Posted: December 01, 2008
tough course, great volunteers
I had heard mixed comments about this race, so I wasn't quite sure what to expect. Amazingly, the weather was perfect for running - I think that happens about once every ten years for this race. I thought the course was quite boring. Running through the tunnel was pretty cool though. The hills for the last 6 miles killed me - I wasn't expecting them to be so tough. The volunteers were great. Very enthusiastic and I like how they called out your time at every mile.
The one really negative part of the race for me was how the cop car was right behind the last runner in the race with sirens flashing. There are two out-and-backs on this course, so this poor woman had to see everyone else running and she looked really embarrassed - they were making it so obvious that she was the last runner in the race. The car was literally 1 foot behind her! I thought it was terribly insensitive. Is this how they always do it in races? I've never run a course with out-and-backs like this before, so I have never noticed.
By: Cynthia W.
Posted: November 30, 2008
Disappointing changes since I last ran Seattle
The organization of this run is still great, except that the first starters (marathon walkers) were delayed by 10 minutes. Grrr. The weather was Seattle sublime: foggy, chilly. The course is gorgeous except that in '05 we ran east and west on the top of the floating bridge; this time the east segment was inside the tunnel. Yuck. And with the change of sponsor those distinctive Harris-Asic logo'd shirts, with great colors each year, were replaced with a thoroughly uninspiring white tech shirt with the opportunity to pay for a finisher's shirt. I spend enough on insurance premiums; I'm not going to buy an extra shirt from these sponsors. Bring back Harris!
By: Crista K.
Posted: November 30, 2008
great course, support, organization
Having read numerous critical comments about Seattle, I was wary about it. However, I have nothing but praise for the marathon.
THE COURSE
The course was good and wasn't that hilly. Yes, there were hills, but if you completed your hill training, you wouldn't find it to be that tiresome. I was expecting mountains based on previous comments, and found the hills to be nothing major (and I'm from Ontario, where it's flat). Having the hills at miles +21 was challenging, but again, with proper strategy it's more than manageable. The walkers and half marathoners were barely noticed, except for the last mile. Otherwise, they kept to the side or weren't even on the course because of how the course divided and separated the different groups.
FOOD
Water and Gatorade were available every 2 miles, which didn't seem to be often enough. Post-race food was okay. Chocolate milk was perfect, and they had some bananas and fruit cups. Nothing special but who really eats a lot immediately?
EXPO
Expo was ok but seemed to focus on selling merchandise. Couldn't find a pace band anywhere, but brought a back up. Free t-shirt was ok. Sizes were unisex and the shirt isn't that special.
MISCELLANEOUS
Medal is simple but nice. They had paperweights for the top 10 finishers in each division, which was a nice bonus for me! AND the weather was AMAZING! Couldn't have asked for better running weather. It was cool and dry, with a slight fog. Absolutely perfect! Overall this marathon was GREAT!
HOTEL
Comfort Suites hotel wasn't the host hotel but they allowed me to check out one hour later (while the Westin, the host hotel, was charging for a late checkout past 12 p.m.), had a great carb breakfast, and was a 5-minute walk from the starting and finishing line. They also had super comfy beds and followed my request for 2 double beds and didn't charge extra for the third person. I highly recommend staying here for future Seattle Marathons.
By: Saul P.
Posted: November 30, 2008
OK weather. Good race.
When the weather is nice, the Seattle Marathon is a very enjoyable race. This year it was misty, gray, and calm. For a November day in Seattle, this is pretty good running weather. Start time temperatures were comfortable enough that I ran the race in shorts and a t-shirt.
The size of the marathon field is just right (a few thousand) - not too large, and not too small. The enthusiastic atmosphere at the start line made for an energetic run through downtown. The course is not fast. There is a bottleneck going up the freeway ramp early in the race, and the hills come late in the run. Still, this course has much to offer. Running through downtown is visually interesting. Low clouds obscured much of the scenery along Lake Washington, but going through the arboretum is beautiful.
Good race-day organization. The water stations were plentiful and well staffed. Although not many spectators along the course, there was a good crowd at the finish. The finisher's medal is nice. The recovery area is indoors - nice, but it's hard to find a place to sit.
The Seattle Marathon has a good expo. They give you a nice goody bag, but this year's race shirt looked very plain (plain white).
By: bas v.
Posted: April 20, 2008
Good race, but could be so much better
I registered for Seattle after the Twin Cities Marathon turned out to be a fiasco because of the heat. Weather-wise, I hit the jackpot - great running weather in 2007. My thoughts:
THE GOOD
Expo was good and well organized, plenty of drink stations that were well staffed, two Gu stations. Overall, the volunteers were great. There aren't huge crowds along the way, but the people that were out were cheering every single runner on. Liked the start and finish area, though they should not have walkers start so close to marathoners, or they should make clear to them not to walk four abreast.
THE NOT SO GOOD
The course was ok. Felt like it could have been so much better. I think the stretch on the highway is a horrible idea. The concrete is about the worst surface to run on, and on that bridge runners are totally exposed to the elements. After about 8 miles of this nonsense there are another 9 miles during which you run back and forth along a lake. It was nice, but a bit boring after awhile; I like to see neighborhoods and variety when I run a city marathon. The last 7-8 miles are really nice, but quite hilly. I had not trained on hills at all, but got over them alright. I think the organizers should redo the course, have it go through different neighborhoods, get the community involved, and avoid those long lonely stretches.
THE UGLY
Not nearly enough potties along the course. Just a couple here and there, all occupied at the beginning. I had to wait until mile eight to finally pee. After mile one there should be about twenty porta-potties. Also, the finishing area is a joke.
I had a great race and I love Seattle, but I wished the organizers would change some things. It really made me realize what a great marathon the Twin Cities Marathon is.
By: Ryan Rojeski
Posted: January 24, 2008
This is a REALLY nice race!
This was my first race and now I have run many. I always like this course and want to run it each year. It is a truly beautiful course running next to Lake Washington and running through a mile-long tunnel. Running through the arboretum and through downtown Seattle was great too. But the best was the finish in Memorial Stadium. This is my favorite race that I have run yet.
By: Ken P.
Posted: December 26, 2007
Great Day for a Marathon
The marathon turned out to be great way to cap off a wonderful Thanksgiving trip to Seattle. (A 12-minute PR was also nice.)
The host hotel was very nice, except no post-race party - only free hot chocolate. Yippee. The expo was very well organized. Only one turn for food at the buffet Pasta dinner. They need to change that. Dick Beardsley was a great speaker.
The weather turned out to be nearly perfect. The course is routed pretty nice. It is a very scenic course. As hilly as Seattle is, overall the course could be a lot worse. The hills come towards the end so that makes things interesting. I tried to "bank" some time before the hills and that might have cost me a few minutes.
The stadium finish is really neat and there is not much to speak of as far as post-race food. The food situation is not a big deal for me but I could have certainly used a beer or two. No beer at the finish that I could see.
With a few minor tweaks this could be an excellent marathon.
By: Janee G.
Posted: December 21, 2007
Redemption after Chicago!
This was my first Seattle Marathon. I registered for the race after my attempt at the disastrous Chicago Marathon. After training for months for Chicago, I was hugely disappointed when I dropped out at mile 11 because of the heat.
My Chicago goal was 3:55 and I was able to do just that in Seattle! I loved the course and I thought the hills were brutal. I actually enjoyed the 2 out-and-back sections along I90 and to Seward Park - it was fun to see all the really fast people heading back in the other direction!
The stadium finish was awesome!
There are only a few things that bugged me. What is up with having to buy the finishers t-shirt at the expo before the race??
There was hardly any food left for the marathon runners. You would think the full marathoners would need it the most??
The fans were ok. I understand it's late November, so it was nice to see people cheering along the way.
Great race - would definitely do it again!
By: Melisa C.
Posted: December 04, 2007
Beautiful day for a race
I ran the half again this year. The weather was spectacular. I love this race. The course is hilly. This flatlander is not used to hills but I can live with it because it is so pretty.
What bothered me was when I was approaching the finish area, a few blocks from the stadium, I kept to the right because I knew the marathoners were coming in. I don't like being yelled at to move; many other half-marathoners and I were treated quite rudely by the course monitors. I even said to one of the monitors, "They are so rude to us."
When I was entering the tunnel I crashed into a spectator who walked in front of me - not good, not good at all.
I love finishing on the field, which is one of the reasons I run this race. I really wish there were volunteers to retrieve our gear bags. I am an amputee runner. It is very difficult to climb very steep stairs in my running leg. I was literally begging a lady to help me, she kept telling me there was no one and I would have to go get it myself. Defeated, on the verge of tears, I turned and walked away. The lady came back to me after seeing my running leg, and she then offered to go get my bag herself, which she did. I am eternally grateful for that.
Once again, no food in the finish area; it was likely eaten by friends and family. There was less food than last year and no Ivars, which I was looking forward to. The hot, salty broth hit the spot and was just what I needed at the moment. They really need to restrict friends and family from the recovery area. At least have a "no race bib, no food" rule. It's ridiculous.
This is one of the best organized events around. I hope to run the full someday.
By: meeghen g.
Posted: December 01, 2007
Not happy with the organization
I ran the half marathon this year. It was a perfect day for a run, and was a great way to finish off the racing season. The course was fun and the support and spectators were decent.
But the organization will prevent me from running this again. First, as others have mentioned, having to go into Seattle for packet pick up was an additional expense on top of the steep entry fee. Second, the start was very poorly done. The marathon walkers started just 15 minutes before the half runners, which meant we ran smack into them after the first couple miles. The start was just a mad dash to cross the starting line. All the pacers were standing too far in the front of the pack and it was just a mass of people being swept along for the first several miles, with people running on the sidewalks, dodging parked cars, spectators, columns, etc. And third, the recovery area was terrible. If there was any food, I never saw it. The area was packed with people and there was no area marked "food." I did see some hot drinks, and I managed to snag a Gatorade, but not a bite of solid food anywhere. This is not something I would expect at a race this size. Seattle could definitely learn something from Portland's finishing area.
By: jason h.
Posted: November 30, 2007
I loved this marathon, but where was my food?!?!
I had such a good time at this race. The city, the expo, and the race were all fantastic. After running Portland in the prior month, this course was absolutely beautiful. The weather was great. I was worried about the hills after reading some reviews, but the hills after mile 19-20 are not to bad really. The only part that really disappointed me was the lack of food at the finish. I got 1 bite of steak on a toothpick and a chocolate milk. All other food was gone when I got there, oh yes, there was some clear chicken broth that they called "hot soup." Other than that, this was one of the best times of my life.
By: Mark C.
Posted: November 29, 2007
I loved It, but will never do it again!
There are three reasons why I will never do this again (until these things change):
1. The time of the year is awful. We definitely got lucky this year with the weather, but it was really cold Sunday morning.
Solution: Change the date.
2. Going into Seattle to pick up your race number on either Friday or Saturday is ridiculous. There is no place to park (free), and for people who live in the greater Seattle area, it means two trips to the city instead of one.
Solution: Allow runners to pay extra to have numbers mailed out or allow day-of-race pick-up for numbers.
3. I rated the course a four. It is a nice course, but there is so much of Seattle that you don't see. Ballard, Magnolia, University District are all absent. I would like to see the out-and-back to Seward Park and the out-and-back on the floating bridge reworked.
Solution: Reroute the course to see more of the city - Ravenna, Cowen Park, University of Washington, Burke Gilman, Ballard.
By: Ted G.
Posted: November 29, 2007
not for sissies
This was my 34th marathon and second Seattle Marathon. I ran (the same course) in 1999. The first thing I noticed was how much the entry fee has increased. Wow, you expect some increase over the years but... wow.
This is a great marathon. Don't come here expecting 70-degree, sunny weather and a flat course... not going to happen. So, dress for a cold and maybe rainy day and train for hills and have a really great run along Lake Washington. The aid stations and course support are great.
The only problem I noticed was the total lack of food in the recovery area. The problem is that friends and family are allowed into the runner recovery area. I watched families walk by and help themselves to large quantities of the food/goodies. Hmmm.
Come on, Seattle. For the amount of money you charge, you can do better. If you cannot figure this out, look to the south to the Portland Marathon and see how they do a runner recovery/feed area; there is always a variety of great recovery food... even for the runners and walkers that finish in six hours.
By: Von C.
Posted: November 28, 2007
About the lack of food
I ran in the half marathon and I can tell you why there was so little food left. A lot of half marathoners were feeding their friends and family the post-race food. The race organizers need to control the entrance into the recovery area or this will happen again.
By: Ellis B.
Posted: November 28, 2007
Eclectic course, just like Seattle
The course is nice and varies from city, to highway, to suburban lakeside and park (the arboretum), and back to city running environments. The views of the city and the waterfront are excellent.
The volunteers on the course and traffic control were excellent. Restrooms were ample - it is the first marathon I've seen where they mounted the mile marker on the huts. Great idea!
Running into the stadium at the end is a nice touch and they called out your name as you finished. That rarely happens at any big-city marathon I've ever run (about 10 to date). There are benefits to finishing in over 5 hours! Yes, I missed the food just like many of the faster marathoners, but you get over it. Thanks also to the two lady TNT supporters who had oranges and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches at mile 22 - the PB&J saved me. However, there were no bootleg beer providers on the course. That's surprising. Every race I've run in California has always had this. :>)
Having to go up in the bleachers to retrieve your bag after the run was a bummer though!
The crowd support is not great at this one, but the more marathons I run, the less this seems to matter to me. Seattle compares to San Francisco - great views, hills, parks, etc. The marathon is going on, but not too many in the city seem to care. This marathon had lots of serious runners and not many slower runners and/or walkers who seemed to be running for charity.
Regarding the issue about the marathon organizers not donating loads of money to charity, who cares? When you signed up it did ask if you wanted to donate to the U. Wash. Med Center Housing Fund. They never implied or said that any of your entry fees actually went to the cause. I think most people sign up for the challenge first, the city it is in second and charity last. There are plenty of other marathons for the masses where you have the opportunity to raise money for a cause.
By: Michael S.
Posted: November 28, 2007
A firm favorite. Demanding without being too hard.
This is my local race and I've see it in sun, rain and even snow! The course is moderately scenic; the best views are out over Lake Washington and around Seward Park. There are some tough, long, steep hills with one nasty dip under Highway 99 right at the end that can have the legs of those not expecting it turning to jelly.
Organization is very good, with lots of lemon/lime Gatorade (avoiding the vomit inducing cherry) and selections of energy gel plus time callers at regular stages.
This is a world-class race with great support, but it is expensive to enter unless you get in almost a year in advance when it's much cheaper.
By: Stacy C.
Posted: November 28, 2007
Beautiful course, but brutal ending
When we first got there, we spent 20 minutes trying to find the gear-drop spot. We must have asked 5-6 volunteers and nobody could tell us where to go. Finally another runner pointed us in the right direction. The course was beautiful, but the hills at the end were far harder than I had anticipated. The volunteers at all of the water stops were amazing. It did seem as though the half marathoners took care of most of the post-race food though. All I could find was a banana and a cup of coffee.
By: Scott L.
Posted: November 27, 2007
Great Course
This was my 19th marathon, and 2nd Seattle Marathon. I really enjoy the course finding it challenging but not brutal. I only have a couple of complaints with the organization. The lack of finish line food was a surprise. And having the walkers scattered all over the last few miles is unacceptable. I agree it was an improvement from the 2005, but still a problem they need to figure out. I'm not sure the organizers know what it is like to weave in and out of traffic with twenty-some miles on your legs and mind. Also, they advertised a military award division; does anyone know who won that division???
By: Kami K.
Posted: November 27, 2007
Tough Marathon in a Beautiful City
Seattle Marathon
Sunday, November 25, 2007
8:15 a.m.
It was a gorgeous day to run a TOUGH marathon on a scenic course on a beautiful city. Temperature was in low 40s, sunny, and the light wind was not a factor. The hilly portions of the route were marked in orange (slight upward slope) and red (upward slope) on the course elevation map, and there was a fair amount of orange and red on the map. The point-to-point course started and ended in Seattle Center. Miles 4.5 to 8 were out and back to Mercer Island via I-90 Floating Bridge. Then out and back to mile 17 alongside Lake Washington, which included a 2.5-mile loop in Seward Park. The last 10K was indeed challenging, as there were several hills and I felt the pain in my bum knees while running the sharp downward slopes. We could see the Space Needle from about mile 24 to the finish, which was indeed eye-catching.
This was a well-organized race. Packet pick-up was efficient. The expo was pretty good. The long-sleeved high tech race shirt and finisher's medallion were nice. The sporadic crowd support was good. There were water/sports drinks stations at every other mile, and sports gels at two locations. The course was well monitored and the race volunteers were cheerful and helpful. The splits were provided at every mile and mile markers were posted on portable restrooms (called Honey Buckets!). The finish line was inside the Memorial Stadium. We had to take a large number of stairs to the upper deck of the stadium to pick up our sweat bags, which was not an easy task. There were plenty of hot and cold drinks at the recovery area but no solid food, which did not surprise me, because it was not the first time that I finished a marathon, which also had a half marathon, and no food had been put aside for marathoners. I stayed in Best Western Loyal Inn, which was within a short walking distance to start and finish of the marathon, as well as the city center. Seattle is indeed a neat place to visit.
I am a 50-stater and this was #32.
By: Steve D.
Posted: November 27, 2007
Probably my last time running this
I wasn't going to run this year but got talked into it. I'm happy that they took care of the problem with the walkers blocking the road on I-90, but there is still a big problem from the end of the arboretum to the finish, with walkers completely blocking the road. Not sure what can be done about this; maybe post signs reminding people to leave a passing lane. They ran out of food this year. The big reason I won't run this again is the requirement to come down to Seattle twice - once to pick up your number and then again to go to the race. I spent $46 over two days in gas and parking fees. What a waste to spend an extra $23 (on top of a $100 entry fee) just to pick up numbers. However, the course keeps getting better every year as more pavement gets redone. Very smooth surfaces this year. Disregarding the crowding problems, the course is nearly perfection. Unless you're not in shape, the inclines should be a breeze.
By: Dave N.
Posted: November 27, 2007
Not quite living up to its potential
I ran the half marathon this year. Overall, I think this marathon has a lot of potential, considering its popularity and high entry fee; however, it's full of problems.
Firstly, the race falls on an absolutely terrible day. The weather in Seattle at the end of November is downright ugly. This year it wasn't raining or snowing, at least, but it was about 35 degrees at the start, which kinda sucks. Consequently, there are few spectators, because they have more sense than to go outside.
Secondly, they really skimp on the food at this race. I know GU was supposed to be out on the course, but I didn't see it. Also, in the recovery area the traditional runner foods (like bananas) were scarce to begin with and gone by the time most marathoners finished, although there were plenty of calorie-free items like Talking Rain flavored water and tea and stuff. I like these items and I'm glad the companies sponsor the race, but it would be nice to mix in some bagels or oranges or ANYTHING with calories. People just burned a few thousand of them, after all. One major exception to my complaint: there was some beef company handing out free samples of steak and it was quite possibly the most delicious thing I have eaten... ever. Kudos to them for existing.
Most importantly, I think that the half marathon (the larger of the two races) could have used some sort of seeding or wave start. I'm a front-of-the-pack runner, but it was impossible to actually get to the front before the start. Because of the crowdedness, it took about 3 miles to get up to my running speed. Seattle can do much better than this.
On the other hand, the course is scenic.
Finally, if you're interested in running for a good cause, this is not the race for you. Right after the race an article was published revealing that exactly zero dollars from the giant race fee go to charity, even though runners were led to believe they were supporting one. Actually, the charity lost about $100,000 on the event. The deception by the race organizers is a real bummer.
By: Susan R.
Posted: November 27, 2007
Great weather! How can you complain?
I thought that the race was very well organized, from the packet pickup to the finish line. The volunteers and road marshals were amazing. My only negative comments:
* There were a lot of sections of concrete (hard to plan around, I know).
* The food at the finish was very disappointing, and the walkers need to learn a little etiquette as they were taking up all of the road for my last couple of kilometers.
That being said, overall I think that the race is quite well done!
By: Douglas Becker
Posted: November 27, 2007
Marathon and weather both great!!!!
This was my first Seattle Marathon, and because of reviews on the bad weather some of the Seattle Marathons have had in the past, I was praying for fair weather! God must have wanted me to enjoy the Seattle Marathon, because I got one of the best weather days in all my years of running! From start to finish, I loved the whole race; sure, there were not many spectators, and there was not a lot going on during the race, but this is Seattle, and the views of the city, water, and forest were my spectators that kept me going! After the race, I sat in the shadow of the Space Needle, watching others finish the marathon. If you do this marathon, stay downtown to enjoy very good dinning, and ultimate shopping.
By: Jennifer S.
Posted: November 26, 2007
The good, the bad and the ugly.
Seattle Marathon 2007
The good: wonderful city, cool but dry weather, amazing on course volunteers handing out water, Gatorade, GU and good wishes. Spectators can be sparse in a lot of areas but the ones who do turn out are great (especially those handing out sliced oranges, bananas and gummy bears in the last 6 miles).
The bad: if you are having a bad race (as I did this year) the lack of variety in the course is physically draining as well as mind numbing. After an eventful beginning running through the downtown core and onto the interstate (including the floating bridge) there is an endless flat stretch that if your muscles are aching, makes them ache even more. Then there are a series of hills that continue to climb with sparse downward sections that also offer little relief. On top of that if you finished about 4:10 or more there was little or no food left and only sports drinks with artificial sweetener in them. And instead of having a band play to pump up runners at the beginning of the race, there was a band playing at the end of the race, in the small recovery area, deafening everyone from the runners in the medical area to people waiting in the lost children and parents area. Most importantly, one runner collapsed with only meters to go in the race and officials were very slow to react. When someone finally did call 9-1-1, no one thought to redirect runners. Instead finishers had to run around the two ambulances that arrived through the same tunnel as the runners. Then officials failed to redirect finishers as paramedics performed compressions on the man.
Overall - I had heard Seattle is a tough course - and if I had been as strong as I have been in other marathons likely I wouldn't have noticed as much. But I just feel like organizers have not utilized Seattle's geography by providing greater variety (and less highway) throughout the course. Plus there is no excuse for running out of food - I thought San Francisco was cheap for checking off what food you received on your bib - but at least - as I have been told -they still had food for late finishers. Also, a lack of an emergency plan in the arena (for any kind of emergency) is really bad. Plus - what's with handing out finisher shirts before the marathon even starts?
Just my two cents,
JS
By: Carl M.
Posted: November 26, 2007
Amazing Course w/ some fun hills
This was my second marathon. My first being the crazy hot weather in Chicago. It was a perfect day to run a marathon with lots of sun, no wind, no rain. The organization was top notch, volunteers excellent, and fans were very fun. I really liked running into the stadium for the finish line. I beat my Chicago PR by and hour and twenty minutes. The medal was nicely done. The number of marathons was pretty small compared to the half-marathoners which made it very easy to go at your own pace and not have to race around a whole bunch of people. They gave the walkers their own lane out of Seattle which was nice not having to run through the walkers like in Chicago. All the run was scenic, but it got a bit boring through the wooded section near mile 23-24 (few spectators there).
On the flip side: They could have put the bag check on the stadium grounds so that you don't have to climb to the upper deck of the stadium after you just completed the marathon. The recovery food was minimal and not very useful as far as carbs and protein. The shirts were nice but a bit boxy and didn't fit very well.
Overall: I would definitely recommend this challenging yet very fun marathon. Keep up the great work Seattle!
By: Daren Kobata
Posted: November 26, 2007
Great course and race!
This was my first Seattle Marathon (2nd total), but I have ran several Seattle Half Marathon's. Unbelievable weather this year. That was just the icing on the cake. Expect the worse and hope for the best in terms of weather. If you can't expect that, then go run where the sun shines all year around. Got some bananas and oranges from people watching the race after the Madison hill. Much needed potassium after that. Hills not all that bad as advertised. St. Johns in Portland is just as bad in my opinion. I will be back to break my time from this year for sure. It's an annual tradition for me. Sure it's November, but how fun is it to go to Downtown Seattle and pick up your packet when all the Holiday events are happening and it is decorated. Macy's parade in the morning and tree lighting in the evening (Friday).
By: Chris Guillebeau
Posted: November 26, 2007
Better than 2006 but still needs work
The 2006 Seattle Marathon was mediocre, and not just because of the weather. This time, they made progress on a few of the issues but still need a lot of improvement to compete with other NW races.
Good points - parts of the course are nice. Great pre-race expo. Aid stations are plentiful and well-run. Volunteers do a nice job.
Bad points - all the hills are still at the end, making for a very challenging race. Poor technology compared to other marathons. There is no way to track runner progress throughout the race. Extremely poor finishers' area yet again (bring your own food). Inexplicably, there are donuts available at mile 22 but none at the end. Just like last year, the half-marathon folks and lots of non-runners depleted the limited supplies, so there wasn't much left for marathon runners (and I had a 3:32 time).
The day after the race this year, the Seattle Times ran an article showing how only 1% of the proceeds go to the charity that the marathon actively promotes, and in fact none of the $85+ registration fee goes to charity at all, something most runners are not aware of. Go to seattletimes.com and search for the story to read the details.
In short, I am glad I ran the race and have good personal memories, but I am disappointed that my hometown can't do a better job. More and more runners go to Portland and Vancouver every year after getting frustrated with Seattle, and I suspect I'll do the same.
By: Kelly S.
Posted: November 26, 2007
It was great!
The Seattle Marathon was beautiful. This was my second half marathon. I was amazed at all the continued support the entire way to the finish line. It was a bit more challenging than my first one but well worth it.
By: Chris S.
Posted: November 26, 2007
Top-quality event. Organization is excellent.
Organization for this event was absolutely first-rate and I'm glad I chose to come. The weather this year was perfect. Cold and fresh (around 36 degrees) - blue sky and sunshine, which is unusual for November in Seattle. I thought a PR was on the cards until mile 19 when the cruel hills started to appear. I'd say the climb from the Arboretum to the I-5 cost me 15 minutes. The course is very scenic and the city is friendly. Great medal and stylish t-shirts, not gaudy like other events. Overall, the event had class. The only negative I would have would be those miles 19-23. They just killed me. 3hr49 finish. PR is 3hr36.
By: Richard C.
Posted: November 25, 2007
Hilly but scenic
Well, we moved up from Tucson in February of 2007, so it was necessary that we partake in the local marathons, including my favorite, Seafair in Bellevue. As this marathon approached, I was apprehensive about the fabled November weather, but the morning was a crisp, but dry, 31°. Excellent running weather!
The course was varied and full of drama, very enjoyable. Crossing Lake Washington on the I-90 floating bridge and back was a nice touch.
At about mile 19 or 20 started the vaunted hills which were admittedly a bit of a struggle. But after that it was straight downhill to the stadium.
Not crazy about the 'visitor recover area', as it seemed to be more an opportunity for family members to get some freebie, but it was indoors, so that was a plus.
Oh, and lest I forget, nice expo!
All in all, a good introduction to my local marathon! Will do again next year, and I hope the weather stays as nice as today.
By: Kerri Ater
Posted: November 25, 2007
What a great experience - sunny and scenic!
My first marathon but having experienced this marathon, I can't wait to do another. The sun was out, the fans were smiling, the course was scenic and the organizers/volunteers were wonderful.
By: Dale Marchand
Posted: November 25, 2007
Quality Fall NW Marathon
Great race. Expo is *very* good. Well organized and staffed. Race day weather for 2007 great. Lots of concrete running so legs will get pounded. Run across Lake Washington was pretty neat, although inevitable headwinds made stretch a bit tough. Nice run through Seward Park, with plenty of supporters en route. Second half definitely hilly, but managed to BQ on this course. Only gripe was poor food offerings after the race.... I had to search out bananas, didn't find bagels, etc. Pretty poor for after-marathon refuel, but otherwise a great race. Neat to finish running in a stadium.
By: jo jo w.
Posted: November 25, 2007
2007 race was GREAT
I've been lucky with the Seattle Marathon weather-wise. The only other time I ran it (8 years ago) the weather was perfect. This year it was cold and clear - no rain! Organization and race support is fantastic. Water stations are well staffed and well supplied. The course is scenic but hilly. Definitely not a PR course. You can see the Space Needle (where the finish line is) over the last few miles. Mile markers are accurately placed. Recovery area was nice and warm with plenty of food. Good expo for a marathon of this size. Nice long sleeve tech shirt.
I like the Seattle Marathon, but I don't know why they hold this race over Thanksgiving weekend. Don't they know it's a pain to travel over Thanksgiving? If they would hold it only a few weeks earlier, they could easily double the number of entries. This race is that good.
By: Adela M.
Posted: November 25, 2007
Phew - they weren't kidding about those hills
This was marathon #2 for me, but first time doing the Seattle Marathon. I had a great time, and we had absolutely PERFECT weather this year. The course was challenging, so I was about 10 minutes slower than my time on my first marathon, but I felt fantastic at the finish.
The only complaint about organization that I have is that it's tough breathing in all that exhaust from the cars on I-90 and Madison.
By: Matt K.
Posted: July 23, 2007
Build me an ark!
I ran Seattle in the cataclysmic downpour in 1998. The course is beautiful, for the most part, albeit hilly. No way around that in Seattle. The organization is solid. Not too many fans (who wants to stand around in the cold rain and cheer a bunch of skinny runners?). But God only knows why they continue to stage the race in November. As a Puget Sound native, I know like everybody else around here that November, of all months, is the wettest, the windiest, and the wildest. Inviting people to run 26.2 miles in rain/snow/gale force winds is just cruel. I'll never run the race again so long as it's held in November. The Seattle Marathon, in fact, almost cured me of ever running another marathon - period. But I'm going to try Portland this October. I've heard the weather's nice (I hope I haven't jinxed myself...).
By: Michael S.
Posted: May 22, 2007
Extra tough for 2006
I like the Seattle Marathon; it's a pretty scenic course, plus there are plenty of spectators urging you on with cheers, music and even someone I call "the Flag Guy" at Seward Park.
Support is great, with regular Gatorade available and 2 Gu stations later on. The recovery area is crowded and hard to get around, with too many non-runners, and the food is a bit nasty but OK.
I found the course hilly, and the winding climb through the arboretum, across the I5 to Eastlake, is a heartbreaker. This was my 4th Seattle Marathon and the hardest as my feet froze as I slowed up this hill and I couldn't get going again.
The run alongside the I5 in Eastlake and the decline to the last few miles is soul destroying, with either lots of noise or no spectators. Teeth-gritting time!
Best part is parking. I know a spot near the start line that no one else seems to know is there, so I can get in and out easily without paying. HAH! I used to live in Eastlake and I actually walked there the first 2 times. Good for a warm up.
Given the great views across Lake Washington and other areas of the course, plus the great crowd support, I'll definitely do his one again... although it's probably not going to be the fastest course for me.
By: Melisa C.
Posted: February 07, 2007
Half Marathon
I ran the half. This was my first in Seattle, and second overall. I love the course and will definitely do this event again. No one can help the weather, which may be the reason for the lack of spectotors. I will never forget the wonderful woman standing in front of the Starbucks cheering everyone on. "Don't you be looking at the Starbucks," she shouted, "Keep on going!" She was wonderful!!
My biggest complaint is the inside finish area. Way too many family members/visitors and very little seating. I was limping, hurting, and in pain - and there was nowhere to sit except on some stairs near the back. It seems that the few chairs available were taken by family members/visitors who also were eating the food for the runners.
The computers to look up your results and the live video are a nice touch. Registration very well organized. Expo not very crowded. Tickets for the monorail were $5.00 for a ride back, and it wasn't running. I had to limp back to my hotel about a 1/2 mile or more only to find it running when I got to my hotel. Monorail to and from would be nice, and making it free for runners would be even better. I have been there previous years as a spectator for a loved one and runners with a race number could ride free then (of course there was the accident and that ended that).
A great race. I hope to run the full someday. I would love to see this race earlier in the year when the weather is better.
By: Jorge L.
Posted: February 04, 2007
Some very scenic views
Nice marathon. It was very cold (there was snow later on) and rainy... and then drizzily... which put a damper on things, but a lot of the views along the route (especially along the water) are quite nice and scenic. There is decent organization with ample water stations and porta-potties. The last few miles are rough - lots of rough hills. Running towards the Seattle Space Needle is also very cool, as is running to the finish line in the stadium. Having to walk up stadium stairs to get to your baggage and food is not so cool.
Great expo with lots of freebies and giveaways. I think I may have gotten my marathon entry cost back in freebies. :o)
Just wish it wasn't so rainy and cold.
Yah - my first West Coast marathon under my belt!
By: paul g.
Posted: February 04, 2007
Good solid marathon
This was my first Seattle Marathon. I did not expect the weather to be so cold, but there was no wind, so I did not notice the cold when I got going. The race course was not as hard as I had expected. Having read all the comments about how hard the last six miles were, I gave the course a bit more respect than I should have.
Ran 3:03 in Seattle - 1 minute slower than Amsterdam a month before. Seattle and that course are both as flat as a pancake; I had pleanty left in tank at the finish, and should have broken the 3-hour mark.
The only bad thing about the race I can complain about were the walkers the last four miles the were all over the place, 3 and 4 across the course. I had to run outside the cones to keep by pace up, otherwise I would have had to stop to get around them. Total lack of respect for the runners. This should be improved.
Will be back next year to break 3 hours. Great people, lovely city.
By: Timothy S.
Posted: January 06, 2007
September would be much better
The first two Seattle Marathons I ran had cold, clear weather, but the 2006 race started with snow and then rain for 1 1/2 hours. This is a great course but it would be more attractive in September when it is usually clear and 55 degrees. I have no complaints about the organization - I think they run it very well.
By: Craig O.
Posted: December 21, 2006
Well Organized, But Unfavorable Time of Year
Comments are for the half marathon:
Mother Nature took its toll on me this year. I've done the half marathon 4 or 5 times now. Each year I hope for a non-freezing or non-raining race. Unfortunately this year it was 38 degrees and raining the entire race (it may have stopped for 5 mintues). It was actually snowing when I left the house. So an hour and forty minutes later, I was totally beat up. At 40+ years maybe I'm just getting to old for the weather factor. Can we have this darn this at the end of September? Geez!
I'm a Seattle native, so, yes, weather issues happen, I realize. November is just not a good month to have a race like this. Of course, the weather is not your fault, but why not reduce that element of uncertainty and pick a new month?
Well organized and I applaud the fans who cheered us on. I also like the Asics shirts and all the great help at the expo. Seemed to be plenty of food but my hands were so numb I didn't stay around long enough to eat.
See you next September 30th. :-)
By: Evan Riggs
Posted: December 20, 2006
Overall good... but why at the end of November?
This is my first Seattle Marathon, and overall (course, organization, fans) it was a great time, but my biggest question is, why is it the last Sunday in November? The temperature at the start of the race was 34 degrees with freezing rain and sleet, and by the end of the race, it had warmed up to a balmy 37 degrees. I know the race organizers cannot control the weather, but they can certainly control when this race is run. I know one of the reasons that it is not run earlier in the fall is that the Portland Marathon (a bigger, more established and successful race) is run on the first Sunday in October. It would be tough to compete with that race. And I know the reason for not having it in the middle of the summer is that the SeaFair Marathon is run in Seattle toward the end of July, but why not have this race in May? At least there is a better shot to have decent weather. But other than the weather, the race organizers did a great job. The mile markers were the easiest to see out of any marathon I've ever run (4) and the volunteers did an amazing job working to help the runners out. At one point I was at a turn-around, and I dropped my cup of water because my hands were too cold, but the volunteers crossed the street and gave me more on my way back because they saw me drop it. It's little things like that that make the race a good experience. People have complained about the post-race food, but after running 26 miles, I am in no mood to eat more than a banana or a bagel, so it's not really a big deal to me. Overall, this race was a wonderful experience and I would definitely recommend it.
By: Thomas 513
Posted: December 18, 2006
A solid race with a ton of potential
I really enjoyed this race. It was well organized and the course is good. There are a lot of interesting parts of the course (Lake Washington, running through a tunnel, Seward Park, great views) but the hill on Mile 21 is less than desirable for a PR. Overall, way, way above average and totally worth doing.
By: Hieu N.
Posted: December 10, 2006
Weather could have been worse
This is my first Seattle Marathon (5th overall). Weather could have been worse, with snow and freezing rain. I was glad that it was drizzling, not pouring. A couple downside are (1) trying to avoid some puddles at the park, (2) weaving through the walkers on I-90 bridge. I could sympathize with others who finished after 5 hours without any decent food. I would be mad too. Organizers need to take care of participants instead of letting other family members take advantage and consume all of the food. I could care less about the fans, except at the start and finish, where there were plenty.
- Race course: Good, but challenging hills
- Post-race: So-so, and BAD for late finishers
- T-shirt: Good
- Spectators: OK
- Expo: Good
- Medal: Excellent
By: slo m.
Posted: December 05, 2006
Betrayed
PLUSES: The course is beautiful, and this would be a wonderful event if: 1. It took place in July - Sept; 2. The course ran backwards - hills at the beginning, following the monorail through downtown Seattle at the end... but this will never happen for understandable logistical reasons. The finish line is a blast. I loved the dedication of the few spectators who braved the horrific weather this year to cheer the runners on.
MINUSES: I felt betrayed by the race's website, advertising buses from the finish line back to the host hotel, only to find that wasn't true when I walked out into the exhibition hall lobby, after I changed into dry clothes! The monorail was also running on a reduced schedule, and not very accommodating of marathon runners.... The locals knew it was under repair and probably made appropriate plans, but us out-of-towners were ill-informed and out of luck. It was a miserable 2/3-mile walk in the pouring 34-degree rain back to my hotel, and my dry clothes were soaked. You should have seen all the unhappy faces of the runners walking back from the expo. I would implore the race directors to make sure their website is constantly updated so that unpleasant suprises like this can be avoided.
By: Alex T.
Posted: December 03, 2006
Fun course, but not for a PR
Never had hot clam chowder that tasted soooooo good after being out in the cold for so long.... I am now a clam chowder fan.
By: Linda K.
Posted: December 03, 2006
Fun course, but crowded with runners
The half marathon is a great course. Plenty of water and fuel, and the spectators were very nice. BUT, the walkers should leave after the runners, as many do not follow very good etiquette and walk three and four abreast, causing A LOT of congestion at first. There were so many runners this year that I couldn't ease into any kind of pace for having to adjust for slower runners. Running for a fast time is not an option. A wave start would help tremendously!
By: alan h.
Posted: November 30, 2006
Nothing special
We had not run this race since 1998. I participated in the marathon, my wife ran the half. They do a good job of meeting your needs on the course. They can do nothing about the weather. My fault I got hit with the sleet at the end of the race. Be prepared to run on a lot of cement. Maybe in better weather more spectators show up. Very little press coverage. The video on the news was from the half marathon; my wife got five seconds of fame.
Being picky, here is what they could do better: Start the 1/2 in waves. The 1/2 is a popular event now with more runners than the course can hold. Getting more spacing between the runners would be good. Having some balloons up at the mile markers to make them more visible would help. If I was focused on running hard I would have never seen a single marker. GPS doesn't work well in the trees.
By: Antoni H.
Posted: November 30, 2006
Improvements made this year
This is my third consecutive year of completing the full marathon course (plus a half the year before that).
One of my complaints in years past was the marathon walkers that you would hit as you started up the I-90 express ramp around mile 2. It was a single lane and you would have marathon walkers walking 2, 3 or 4 abreast, causing congestion. This year that had the walkers go on one lane and runners in a seperate lane. This was a big improvement.
This was also the first time the weather really was bad in the 4 years I have run this course. This is a chance you take running in late November.
The volunteers were excellent, especially considering the harsh conditions (temps in the mid to high 30s and rain). I only saw smiles and heard words of encouragement.
By: shawn m.
Posted: November 28, 2006
Good, hard, pretty course; horrible organization
The GOOD: Gorgeous course, very hard last six miles (very hilly, the map and elevation chart don't do it justice). Nice medal, and lots of aid stations and volunteers.
The BAD: NO TRANSPORTATION to the start line or more importantly from the finish line (the monorail was down for repair and no busses were offered). Lame tech shirt, and no food or supplies for finishers after the five-hour mark or so. Nice run, and a pretty course, but I couldn't recommend it overall to others!
By: Leslie B.
Posted: November 28, 2006
Weather sucks, but race organization rocks
Well what did I expect? It is Seattle after all; there should be reasonable expectations of rain. Mother Nature provided plenty of cooling precipitation - all through the race. Advice to runners: come prepared with lots of breathable, waterproof layers.
Extremely good race organization. Goodie bag and shirt were exceptional. Course was beautiful and well stocked at aid stations. Almost no music or entertainment along the course. Somewhat confused finish area.
By: No C.
Posted: November 27, 2006
Time for a change
I hate slamming a race because I know how hard the people work to put it together - but Seattle stinks as a race as of right now.
The weather in late Nov. is horrible. This year was soaking wet and very cold. The fans who came out where great - all 50 of them. But on the whole there are 3-4 mile stretches of road where you do not see a single fan... the worst being the stupid forest they send you through for two miles or so at mile 21-23. Not a soul in there except people out walking their dogs.
The course is ok - very hilly at the end. Only an elite runner would call the last six miles of hills moderate. For the other 90% of the people there, it is a cruel way to finish a very long and cold and wet day.
They need to re-think this course and change the date to a month earlier and maybe fans will come out.
By: Corey G.
Posted: November 27, 2006
My first marathon!
This was my first marathon. I started feeling the pain at mile 13. I was really doubting myself until I got to 16 and realized I had fewer than 10 to go. The pain didn't get much worse, so I just trudged along. A little bit wet and a little bit cold but not too bad.
By: Lori M.
Posted: November 27, 2006
Great marathon... nasty weather
It rained off and on throughout the entire race. More "on" than "off." And it was COLD!!!
- Expo was small but fine.
- Participant t-shirt was fine.
- Organization was very good. Lots of porta-potties and aid stations throughout the course.
- The course itself was excellent, well marked and far less hilly than I anticipated.
- There weren't many spectators, but the ones that did show up get high ratings for braving the weather to cheer us on.
- The finish area was inside Memorial Stadium, which was nice for keeping us warm and dry. The finish area food however was *okay* at best. They had chowder, but since I'm not a chowder fan I didn't partake. Even if I were a chowder fan I'm not sure I would have wanted some after such a long run. I AM a huge fruit smoothie fan but didn't partake of the FROZEN fruit smoothies either, as the last thing I wanted to do was eat a frozen item. I was mainly looking for some carbs (muffins, bagels, etc.) but couldn't find any. Ended up walking out with just a banana and bottled water. Quite disappointing.
Would I do this race again? Probably since it's a local race, but I'd wait until the last minute and only sign up if the weather looked half-way decent.
By: Doug M.
Posted: November 27, 2006
Snatched defeat from the jaws of victory
Good race except for end-of race glitches. This is a geat course (or would be if not for the seasonable weather: cold, socked-in and raining most of the race). Surprising to see ANY fans in such horrible weather - but, they were out there!
At the start they were talking-up the hot food at the finish.... Then after five hours of running in freezing rain, that hot food really sounded good! Ooops. No hot food.... "We ran out.... How about a banana?" Also, when I got back I noticed I still had my chip on. They didn't have anyone collecting these at the end (and after five hours of running in the rain it was the last thing on my mind.... The HOT FOOD was on my mind). So now I get to screw around trying to mail it back. The no-food and chip glitches detracted from an otherwise good marathon (assuming some reasonable - i.e. UNSEASONABLE weather).
By: Lee R.
Posted: November 27, 2006
Really good day.
This was the first full marathon I have taken part in. The conditions on the day were wet and cold, which personally I didn't mind; I felt it made the runners dig a little deeper. The course was well planned with good directions and water stations that were well stocked. I had a great first half, but after stopping to use the restroom at the 13-mile point, I didn't really find my stride again. From there onwards, I really appreciated having the other runners and supporters around me.
I moved to the city in summer, so I knew what to expect from the hills near the end, it felt great to get those out of the way and race the final couple of miles with the Space Needle in sight. I finished in 4:10 - not as fast as I expected but I'm more than happy. As I crossed the finish line the announcer called my name and my wife was there to greet me. Awesome feeling.
The recovery area was busy as expected; I was just happy to get some warm food inside me.
Overall it was a great day. Thanks to all those folks who came out in the rain to cheer us on, the volunteers throughout the course, and to all those who raced.
By: Pat o.
Posted: November 26, 2006
Don't run it in November...
I grew up in Seattle and November is probably the worst weather month. Seattle is one of the few cities you can have a summer marathon, and it would attract a lot more runners and spectators - don't complain about people not wanting to watch a marathon in the wet, wind and cold. And require every member of the organizing committee to run this thing every year in November.
By: Eddie Hahn
Posted: November 24, 2006
Large Improvement from 1998
I ran this race previously in 1998. The course has been modified for the better since. I felt like I really "knew" Seattle better the second time.
It was great running through downtown next to the elevated train (and ironic that a small collision on the same train/track(s) the previous night made the made national news; though it didnt effect marathon day).
The course brought us through downtown, over bridges with great views of the city, through freeway tunnels, large expanses of rural park, and through a very high-class neighborhood with million-dollar homes (this also happened to be one of the hilliest sections of the course).
The weather was moderately cool along the route, and seemed to get progressivly colder as I ran, probably low 40s or high 30s. I will take this any day over 1998's bone-soaking downpour, however. (The nature of the race's traditional Thanksgiving Day weekend date and location in the NW is that you can get bad weather; that's just the way it is).
The medal is nice, course support was fine, and refreshments at the finish were good, to the best of my recollection.
The pasta dinner is too much of a high-class, overpriced ($25) event, and not much of a family affair. The all-weather "walking billboard" t-shirt has a very tiny race logo on the front, and about 20 advertisers on the back. I rarely wear it.
The marathon bus tour is nice, but way overpriced at $20 each!
By: Edward F.
Posted: August 31, 2006
No hot food except clam chowder!?!? @#%
Good race, very well organized on the course, but I was VERY disappointed by the food situation in the recovery area. After 26 miles and 80 bucks, I'd like something warm to eat other than clam chowder. Very, very skimpy on the food. Felt kind of ripped off, actually. If it weren't for that, I'd recommend it!
By: Oscar B.
Posted: August 18, 2006
Best Organized Marathon I Know
I have done Seattle twice, and I have always been impressed by how well organized it is. The course is either downhill or flat for most of the first 20 miles. Then there is a climb, and then downhill again. For the last three miles, it is easy to understand how much you have left to run, since you finish by the Space Needle, which is visible. If you understand the course and how to run it, there is no reason why you can't PB here. At every mile marker, there is a volunteer reading the time. You never feel like you are out on your own on this course.
Also the course is very nice and diverse (lakefront, downtown, and residential). The last three years the weather has been perfect for a run. My only suggestion is that the technical race shirts should have longer sleeves. Both years they have been too short for me, even in size large, even though normal medium size shirts usually fit me well.
By: Greg L.
Posted: August 09, 2006
A flawed race
The Good: The start at the Space Needle, the run through the arboretum and how scenic much of the course is. Seattle is a beautiful city! In addition, it's a very well organized race and the expo is excellent.
The Bad: The spectator support is terrible, particularly the last five to seven miles. Very few citizens of Seattle seem to come out to support the runners. Also, the course needs to be improved. The end of the race is extremely hilly, making it a pretty grueling run - and running on a freeway (in spite of it being over a beautiful lake) is monotonous and somewhat bizarre. Lastly, I would strongly suggest they move the date of the marathon a bit as November weather in Seattle can sometimes be difficult with rain, wind and colder temperatures.
By: Tory K.
Posted: January 14, 2006
Beautiful Race, but Need More On-Course Support
I love Seattle because... well, I live here. I've run this course a number of times in training. The course itself has sections that are just gorgeous, others that are entertaining (running under the two crashed monorails was fun), and too often boring as all get out.
The water and Gu stations are well stocked, but let's get a little pepper in it, people! Thank the LORD for Chuckit water station about mile 23. I think they were the only ones who were having any fun. They had music. Encourage the volunteers running the stations to set up a boom box, throw on a silly wig, do a jig... something to divert the runners' attention! There are just way too many stretches of no one and nothing to take your mind off the fact that you're running a very very long time.
Love running across the lake, through the arboretum, and through the tunnels. Hate running alongside traffic where most people stare at you blankly like you've lost your mind, a few honk and wave, and some even have the audacity to mock. Yeah, thanks for making Seattle the wonderful warm place it is.
Suggestions: NO FAMILIES IN THE DOGGONE FOOD AREA! I came in at 5 hours and there was not a lot of food left, but I saw lots of kids chowing down on donut holes. Your kid didn't run 26.2, nor did Grandma Jane; they have no right to the post-race food. Leave it to the runners, please. We paid for it and we ran for it. If the kid is going to get hungry, bring some food. I had a child reach for a water at the same time I did right out of the finish line, and grab it out of my hand. Where was this kid's parent?
Set up some diversions along the way. I just ran Disneyworld and the course was peppered with high school bands, choirs, cheerleaders, etc. For such a large city it is pathetic that there isn't more support for the runners.
Either have the Boy Scouts help, or drop them. A big deal was made that the Boy Scouts would be there to volunteer to go up the stadium steps and retrieve your bags. When I came in not a single one was around. The help at the bag check was rude and short with me. Guess who doesn't want to walk from the field to the top of the stadium after a race? SOMEONE WHO JUST RAN 26 MILES! An acquaintance was there with the Boy Scouts and he said they left at 1:00. Nice.
This is, overall, a great race if you love our PNW weather and a challenge. I won't do the full again, though. Just not enough to keep me diverted in those last few miles. I'll head across the Columbia to Portland where they know how to put on a race. Sign me up for the half out of a love for my "home town" but not the full again.
By: Lucy L.
Posted: December 15, 2005
Beautiful and fun
This was my first Seattle Marathon and I was very impressed with the organization, the scenery and the specatators. After running Marine Corps in 2004, the smaller crowd was a nice switch. The water stops and Gu stops were wonderful and always well stocked. The hills weren't fun but expected. The finish line rocked! Thank God for great weather! Don't think twice about running this marathon! A great way to see a town I had never been too!
By: Dave M.
Posted: December 08, 2005
Beautiful Course - Tough 2nd Half
Great race, very demanding course - especially the second half where the hills kick in. Aid stations were well stocked and organized. When crowd was out they were supportive - but many long stretches of just you and the road. Weather can be iffy in late NOV but this year turned out perfect for a fall marathon. My only complaint is that during the first 2-3 miles and last 2-3 miles (depending on your pace) you are competing for road space with many 1/2 marathon walkers who in some cases want to walk 5-7 abreast across the road. Going through the tunnel into the stadium for the finish I had to push to get around 1/2 marathon walkers. Shirt was nice although you had to buy a separate finisher's shirt if you wanted one.
By: Chris S.
Posted: December 07, 2005
Tough but good
This was my first marathon and I knew going in that the infamous hills in the last five miles would be tough and the first steep on one Galer St. was but I had prepared and made it through. I have nothing to compare this marathon to, but I though the organization was great and the spectators were enthusiastic, although they were kind of sparse in some sections of the course. The course itself is for the most part beautiful but the section that follows the I-90 express lanes got monotonous.... I was very relieved when I finally got on to Lake Washington Blvd. Overall, this was a great experience and although the hills near the end slow (or stop) a lot of runners, they are manageable if you're prepared going in.
By: Barbara T.
Posted: December 05, 2005
Excellent
I am doing the fifty states, and I loved this marathon! Very organized, beautiful course and friendly people. The course was challenging, but fun. I will do it again the second time around.
By: Olivia G.
Posted: December 03, 2005
Scenic and challenging!
My 7th marathon, 1st time for the hometown run. Weather was great. Save a little gas for the the last 6 miles. I understand wanting the marathon walkers & half walkers to come in around the same time the full runners are finishing, but the course really can be congested with walkers not 'in the know.' I actually saw a guy (walking with 3 others, abreast) elbow a runner in front of me!
By: Scott L.
Posted: December 01, 2005
Don't Underestimate the Hills
Wow, what a course - those last six miles are much tougher than you expect. If you are looking for a challenging marathon, this one is for you. It is tougher than Boston, without the crowds. The City of Seattle seemed oblivious to the marathon events, which is a real shame. A little ADVERTISING would go a long way putting this marathon on the top of the list for many. Seattle is a beautiful running city! Get a title sponsor, Seattle....
By: jac h.
Posted: December 01, 2005
hilly and scenic
I ran the half (lower mileage while recovering from an injury). Weather was perfect, low 40's and fortunately it stopped raining shortly before the race. A bit more hilly than I'd anticipated, especially this one big honkin' incline around mile 7 (mile 20 for full marathoners), but we all survived. Don't plan on a PR. The course was scenic, mostly along the water and through a nice tree-covered park. The finishing stretch was cool, through Seattle's center and the football stadium near the Space Needle. The expo was one of the best I've been to, lots of goodies. The post-party was fun, in a warm indoor section of the arena, with a blues band to keep our moods elevated. Great finisher's medals. The recovery food was so-so, not your usual grub: clam chowder, donut holes and sugary smoothies. What ever happened to good ol' bagels and Gatorade? Otherwise, the race was worthwhile and i recommend it. My boyfriend ran the full, and also had a great time.
I do have one bone to pick: nothing against walkers.... Their *event* started just 15 minutes before ours... clogging up the course, walking 3 or 4 side-by-side, yapping on cell phones, with their fanny packs and spandex shorts, c'mon! I give them credit for covering the same distance we did, but they really need to stay over to one side and let the runners through. It was very annoying having to weave around them or ask them to move. My boyfriend even had a collision with one careless walker who cut right across his path without looking.
Ok, I'm done ranting. :) Overall, it was a great race!
By: martin m.
Posted: November 30, 2005
visible efforts to improve
I ran this course and mostly run and race organized events and could see that real organizational effort had gone into trying to make this a first-class event. The course is somewhat challenging and those last hills will suck out your few remaining energy cells, so don't bet on getting a PR. The spectators are absolutely minimal, but the great and many volunteers make up for it. Calling out the course times is always helpful but only when it's the correct time. This event needs to push itself up a 'professional notch' if it wants to be more than it presently is.
By: Sonya Bodner
Posted: November 30, 2005
What a race!
I came from northern Alberta so any weather that isn't 'real' winter is fantastic. Everyone was so friendly in Seattle. I trained for hills so although the course was tough, I knew it was coming. The race route was very scenic which I enjoyed. Even with the monorail crash, the walk did me good, both before and after the race. Thank you, Seattle!
By: Andrew F.
Posted: November 29, 2005
long walk to the start
The monorail crash the night before the race added an extra mile to my hike to the start line. The chip strapped to the ankle did dig into me pretty good. I did not feel it till that night, but it still hurts, two days later. Those are my only two complaints. Everything else was very positive. Previous comments sum up how great this race is. Having run an aggressive Portland just 7 weeks prior, I took this one easy and enjoyed the scenery. I will run this one again; not for a fast time, but for a fun time.
By: david k.
Posted: November 29, 2005
Spectacular views, weather is unpredictable
I waited until the last minute to register, with the forecast still calling for showers the day before and was surprised by a mostly sunny day - so don't count on the weather for anything.
The course is beautiful, with spectacular views of Lake Washington, downtown, and you can't miss the great view of the Space Needle as you come down the last couple of miles (and I mean downhill!). As everyone else points out, lots of hills towards the end. Course is more challenging that my other reference point (Portland).
Few fans along the road, but who cares? The aid stations were plentiful. Extremely long lines (10-20 people) at the porta-potties in the stages that were shared with the half run and the two walks happening at the same time.
By: Cynthia W.
Posted: November 28, 2005
Spectacularly Beautiful!
What a gorgeous route for an urban run! Across the floating bridge, twice. South along the Sound, a loop at the edges of a penninsula-park, up through the Arboretum, then south into town with views of the Space Needle and downtown architecture. Even the hills (frequent and steep during the 2nd half) were fun. Roads were clear of traffic--thank you!-- water/aid stops frequent enough and friendly, and one can register the day before if you want to increase your chances of running during one of Seattle's momentary sunny moments. Thank you, Sunshine 2005! Very few spectators, but all supportive, and after NYC, I'm still not averaged out to a comfortable roar. The inclines the last half mile, the last .1 were ludicrous; who cares by then except to laugh? Thanks, Seattle and sunshine, for a great fun race.
By: Peter S.
Posted: April 06, 2005
Fight to get your time
Seattle is always a great event with a manageable number of runners. Fans come out despite the cold weather. You'd think with such a small field they'd work out the problems with the chip timing. It was like pulling teeth to get my time and get it posted - I was not alone in this. This was frustrating since I was using this time to qualify for Boston. All in all though a great event and a tough course.
By: Andrea O.
Posted: December 28, 2004
Seattle Marathon is a definite must-do!
Breathtaking city (Mt. Ranier was visible), wonderful volunteers, a course that separates the men/women from the boys/girls, spectacular weather, classy medals and great people to meet along the run.
I'd encourage anyone looking for a challenging marathon to sign up today. We trained for the hills and were prepared, so we weren't shocked at the course, we embraced it and owned it. It gave us bragging rights to bring home to Wisconsin. I even qualified for Boston (but I'm over 40).
I only wish there would have been more crowd support. We were there earlier in the week, and when we mentioned we were running the Seattle Marathon, we were shocked that many people had no idea Seattle sponsored such an event.
Expo was great!! Lots of goodies and good advice.
By: Kent M.
Posted: December 11, 2004
Wow and Wow again
This was lucky #13! Seattle was a completely spectacular course. It was more difficult then I expected but the beauty of the course more then made up for the challenge. The spectators were wonderful; sure there were not thousands out there - it was me and the road, the way a marathon should be.
My one complaint was the porta-potties. I do not always 'respect' a course so to speak, but this course is so beautiful that it required respect and there were not enough porta-potties. What is up with 10 at mile 20 and 3 and mile 6?
The expo was great; lots of freebies and the vendors were glad to be there (not a usual sight). But when you are in Seattle with good weather and a great course, you cannot help but smile.
By: chris rossiter
Posted: December 05, 2004
First-timer's paradise
I ran the half marathon (first time ever!). Beautiful scenery - good timing - and all kinds of difficulty in the course to challenge. I love it! Good course for first-timers, like me. I might try the full marathon next year!
By: Just A R.
Posted: December 04, 2004
Almost Perfect
This was the best organized marathon I have run. First of all, the value for the money was great. $45 early registration pays for a technical shirt, as well as running a big-city marathon through an entertaining course. The expo was great, easy packet pick-up, and good deals. Too bad that only pay parking is available around the Westin Seattle. The volunteers were nothing short of great and even encouraging. The recovery area was nice and warm, though the temperature on the course was great for running. Also spectators were very supportive, and quite numerous for this type of marathon.
My first suggestion for improvement is that the chip be of the shoelace-type. The ankle strap version that they used will hurt during a marathon. I have cuts in my ankle from it. Also I would suggest that the recovery area be free from friends and family of runners. It got a bit crowded. After the marathon, it is hard to avoid distracted walkers in this enclosed space, and I am in no shape to take them on.
By: Steve D.
Posted: December 03, 2004
best year ever!
This year had a far better expo than previous years with short or no lines for picking up numbers and tons of freebies and interesting vendors. The only problem I had was getting to the start from the Mercer Street exit. I should have remembered how bad the traffic backs up from previous years -- next year I'll park on the west side of Seattle Center. It was definitely short-sleeve weather this year with virtually no wind. This is the first time I have run this course hard and without wind it can be a fairly fast course, but you can expect to lose 5 to 10 minutes in the last 7 miles due to Madison Street and the Arboretum. You just need to have a time cushion before the hills. This is my favorite race and I'll continue to run it every year that I am not sick.
By: Greg Wilhelm
Posted: November 30, 2004
Good, but not quite 100%
There are a few things that would upgrade this race -to top-notch. 1. Better overall publicity would encourage more spectator participation. 2. More porta-potties, the lines along the route were often twenty deep in the half marathon. 3. The race recovery area was so packed you had to fight to get air. 4. More volunteers, who add so much to the experience. 5. More entertainment.
On the positive, the half marathon course was interesting and diverse. All the volunteers did a great job.
In comparision to Portland, it lagged behind. In Portland I felt a larger community involvement that was exemplified by more entertainment, more crowd support and overall more facilities. All and all however, it was fun and just a hair away from becoming exceptional.
By: Amy Y.
Posted: November 30, 2004
Sunlight in Seattle
It does NOT always rain in Seattle; we had partly sunny weather, in the 40s, making the run out and back to Mercer Island in the morning a feast for the eyes and soul. Much of the course is run along the lake waterfront, which is lovely. If you are prepared for the hills at the end, you will find much to delight you here. I gave it 4 stars as it is almost all concrete/asphalt, which does get to some of us with older bones. The expo was good; race well organized (although the mile-9 marker was in an odd place), volunteers peppy (thank you people in furry suits somewhere around mile 22 or 23, you made me grin), and Seattle is quite a remarkable place to visit.
I would very highly recommend this--there was plenty of crowd support as far as I am concerned. Good size--about 2300 marathoners--you run with folks, but aren't overly crowded. Gorgeous medal, too, and you run into a stadium to get it. Most excellent award distribution--you just go pick it up, no tedious presentations. Lots of clam chowder, or so it seemed, this year. A classy race, overall.
By: Jon Z.
Posted: November 30, 2004
I had a lot of fun for a first-timer
This was my first marathon. The hills were hard, but if you are prepared you'll get through them. The only reason I gave the course 4 stars rather than 5 is because I got bored with the turn-arounds. There are 2 of them, one on the bridge and one and Seward Park. The scenery got redundant during those stretches. The 'Rocky' theme playing at the top of the hill at mile 20 ruled! The fans were great. I read that there were issues with not enough food at the end. I was relatively slow at 4:31 and there was plenty left. Boy Scouts running the equipment check were handy also.
By: Lorna M.
Posted: November 29, 2004
need more small marathone shirts
We need more activities after the marathon is completed.
By: Cliff D.
Posted: November 29, 2004
And they say Seattle has bad weather
The weather was ideal for running a marathon. It was a little chilly (42 F) but it was mostly sunny and barely even a breeze.
All in all this was a fantastic marathon experience for me. The organization was good, the course was absolutely beautiful running along the water most of the way. Yes, there are some hills at the end and yes, they are as steep as people have said. But, if you train for them, they are certainly manageable. There are definitely PR's to be had on this course especially if you train well for the hills (I improved on mine by 7 minutes). As many uphills as there are, there are also plenty of downhills. So, be prepared for both. The middle part of the course is extremely flat and scenic. The volunteers were all wonderful.
The only thing I noticed was that there was very little in the way of crowd support even with the perfect weather. I just don't think Seattle 'embraces' this event, and I am not sure what can be done to change that. I am not one who needs big crowds though, so this did not bother me, but others might want to take note.
By: Tory K.
Posted: November 28, 2004
Wooo! What a RUSH!
Just got back from running this little baby. Oh my GOSH! The course is beautiful. The weather couldn't have been nicer. My husband and I ran together and loved almost every minute of it.
I'd been warned not to even consider Seattle for a first marathon. The course is definitely not a 'fast' course, but it's doable. If you know, going in, that you're going to hit some nasty hills towards the end, it isn't so bad. Just remember, hills build buns of steel! Embrace the hills!
The expo was great...lots of freebies and support. The shirts were a funky puke green color, but I'm not complaining about a technical shirt!
The day of the race was pretty and clear. The scenery is amazing. It's so beautiful, in fact, you almost forget you're going UPHILL as you run through the arboretum. Post-race blankets, coffee, and Krispy Kremes were appreciated.
Looking forward to running again next year!
By: Iam Nottelling
Posted: November 09, 2004
Second tier marathon.
New York, Chicago, RNR, LA. All are wonderfully organized. You feel like it's $80-$100 bucks well spent. Seattle is 2nd-class. Good, but not great. Seattle is gorgeous, the course is beautiful (except the floating bridge - the view becomes redundant and miserable if it's raining), the people are friendly, and the expo is all you can expect. However; the morning of race day - only water was provided; no bagels or Powerade. Spectators are scattered. The course aid was adequate, and the finish (if you are fast) offers an array of replenishment. Maybe they could have a separate replenishment aisle for half versus full marathoners? I plan on running this again.
By: Mary Young
Posted: July 08, 2004
The weather could not have been better
I ran the half marathon in 2001 and 2002. In 2003, I decided to check out the middle of the course. I was pleased for most of the course. When I got to the floating bridge there was no sun and lots of wind. That had to be the worst part of the course for me.
I am not dependent on crowd support while running so the sections where there were no spectators didn't bother me too much. There were plenty of water stops and port a pots on the course.
There was no food by the time I finished though. That was a little disappointing.
The expo was good. There were lots of interesting vendors and so many freebies. Your arms got sore from carrying your goodie bag.
If I can get to Seattle over the Thanksgiving holiday to visit my relatives again, I will definitely run this marathon.
By: Linda F.
Posted: June 13, 2004
My favorite run
The course is beautiful and fun to run with just the right amount of challenges. Weather was cool and windy but no rain! Fans handing out M&M's at mile 16 and Crispy Kreme's at mile 23!!
By: Kevin Runner
Posted: May 16, 2004
Seattle is beautiful and runner friendly, but...
The city of Seattle is a beautiful place for a run like this. The temperature was cool over the entire course. The spectators were encouraging. The hills made for a good pace change, but were not overwhelming for me. One thing to be advised of: slower runners got poor race support. The power gel stations on the course had only the nasty to eat flavors by the time I got there. The finish line had no Powerade. And the famous soup at the end was nowhere to be seen. Not so much as a cracker. The only recovery foods available to me were coffee, bottled water, and oranges. It was almost an hour after I finished running before I could get to a place to buy something to eat. Slow runners be advised: be ready to provide for your own recovery at the end.
By: Byron M.
Posted: April 03, 2004
Awesome course. Great organization. Fun city.
The marathon course is beautiful and is a real character builder - dont change it, not every course has to be a Boston qualifier. Although it was my first marathon, I'm sure that if you can do this course you can probably do most. Overall the organization was excellent.
The Pros:
Awesome course - very scenic and uncrowded/real fun city/good time of year/great weather/monorail transport to start was great/stations and volunteers excellent/chowder at the end tasty/Boy Scouts bag storage in stands is efficient/expo good/stadium finish exciting especially with name called out on loud speaker/mileage well marked - only missed one sign/Westin hotel conveniently located with great food (expensive).
The Cons:
Downhill concrete off ramps at end deadly/big line up at first porta-potty (2-3mi?)/carbo load dinner good but expensive ($30 for plate of spaghetti) and uninspiring (how about a motivational speaker?)/no bagels at finish/technical race shirt should have Seattle Marathon Logo on it - only logo found on cheap cotton t-shirt.
Overall:
Highly recommended!
By: Bear P.
Posted: December 31, 2003
A pleasingly punishing traipse...
The course was beautiful, the weather was extremely cooperative and the hills were aplenty (and where there weren’t hills, the wind was there to keep you company). You take the good with the bad, I say.
I’ve run 13 marathons now and this was probably the most difficult. Oh sure, the stitch in my side at 16 didn’t help matters, but neither did the winds along the lake. I’m somewhat glad the stitch hit before the Cardiac Hill at 20, at least I didn’t have to kick myself post-race for getting broken on that thing (a 150-foot rise in about a half mile that late in the course??... a little sadistic I think). I was hoping for a Boston qualifier, but Seattle would have none of that.
Time aside... I honestly cannot say enough good things about my experience in Seattle. The spectators were very warm, as were the people of Seattle – very nice. At the fluid stations the water flowed like wine. Though I will say the stations could be a little tight. You did have to know what was where – water first, Powerade last. But, after the first stop all was apparent. Running through the downtown shopping district was great fun... eye candy all around – Christmas decorations, ornate buildings, lots of cheering fans, and more than a few of the faithful waving signs. The pillars of the Monorail overhead were great fun to weave in and out of... not so fun to run into. Picking myself up post-incident added at least a minute or two to the chip time and lump or two to the old forehead. Outside of the embarrassment of colliding with a 20-ton concrete pillar at mile half-ish and the pain of a side stitch at mile 16 (both of which are fairly avoidable, the first being more so), Seattle is a fantastic place to run a THON.
However, do come into this race realizing a cakewalk, it is not – it can be windy along the lake and pack a carabineer and twine for that mountain at 20. But it is certainly one to do. My end goal of all these marathons (outside of qualifying for Boston) is to run one in every state. And this is the one to run in Washington. Best of luck to those running it next year and no messing with those Mono-rail pillars... I’m serious.
By: Aubrey H.
Posted: December 21, 2003
The volunteers were the best !!!!
This is the benchmark of how a marathon should be run. They probably had a hand in the great weather as well. The spectators and volunteers were the best.
I really liked the course layout and how well documented it was. I can't say enough about it, but thank you.
By: Richard E.
Posted: December 12, 2003
Beautiful course, but the wind & hills got me
This was my first marathon. I found the course quite scenic and interesting but beware: the hills at the end are tough! This is not a fast course. My favorite part of the course was the run around Seward Park and the first mile through downtown Seattle (I liked running under the Monrail and between the tall buildings over the first mile).
The course has tougher hills than what I anticipated based on my pre-race examination of the topo map. I ran the first 19 miles at a 6:41 average mile pace then got into big trouble after mile 20. I hit the “wall” pretty bad and my brain bonked the last 3.2 miles (took me 29 minutes to run this section). I have never felt so lost and hungry before. Over the last 7 miles of the course, the first important uphill section occurs on McGilvra Blvd (it’s a short section, not too bad) at about the 19.5 mile mark. After you get up this short hill, the course levels off. When you take a left onto E. Galier Street things get nasty. E. Galier Street is a short section of the course but the hill is steep! The incline reminds me of the hills in San Francisco. My legs could feel the lactic acid build-up. You then take a left onto E. Madison where the uphill continues about half-way down this street (though the slope is not as bad as E. Galier). Half-way down E. Madison the hill peaks and its then downhill to Lake Washington Blvd. Most of Lake Washington Blvd and E. Interlachen Blvd, including the run through the park (lots of turns) has a slight uphill. After you leave the park the course goes downhill slightly until you hit Mercer Street where there is a slight uphill section, then you take a left into the stadium.
The weather in Seattle for the race was wonderful. It was clear and temperature at the start of the race must have been in the high 30’s or low 40’s. The wind was blowing pretty well (from the NE) during the race. During the run out to Mercer Island on the floating bridging the wind was really in your face. This was the only part of the course I did not like. Also, during the run north along Lake Washington the wind was hitting you pretty hard. The fans along the course I thought were great. The cellist playing at mile marker 22 (I think it was mile 22... hard to remember the brain was bonking) made me smile. Also, some of the area residents brought out a tray of doughnuts which I should have sampled. It might have done something to ease the hunger pains.
The post-race food I thought was good. I really liked the slurpies. There should have been bagels or muffins though. Maybe the race directors will take care of this next year. The one thing I really would have liked were more chairs in the recovery area. After running 26.2 miles, a person needs a place to park their fanny.
Overall, I had a great time in Seattle. The race organizers I thought did a wonderful job. I will definitely consider running this course again next year. I want a rematch with those hills at the end!
By: Michael E.
Posted: December 06, 2003
What a race!
Perfect combination of scenery, water stations and fans. I'm doing this one again.
By: Diane G.
Posted: December 03, 2003
A beautiful course with some hills and wind
The course for this marathon is varied, interesting and - on a clear sunny day - quite beautiful. Several times, snow-capped mountains seemed to appear out of nowhere, particularly toward the middle of the course. There are two challenges to keep in mind: first, the headwind on the floating bridge out to Mercer Island and returning from Seward Park, and, second, the hills around miles 18-22. While the overall elevation gain is modest, the gradual ascent through the Washington Park Arboretum is a challenge so late in the race. The hills and winds are certainly something to consider when choosing a pace for the first half.
The many spectators were very encouraging. At one intersection around mile 20, a cellist serenaded us as we reached the top of a hill! Water/Powerade stations were ample. There were two well-stocked Gu stations. The recovery food included smoothies, crackers, clam chowder and fruit. The volunteers serving food were all very encouraging. In fact, the spirit throughout the event was very positive and invigorating. I was a bit disappointed to find that there were no bread slices or bagels. I found myself really craving such things at the end of the race, and I'd assumed that they were standard post-marathon fare. Next time, I'll be sure to stash some bread in my backpack, just in case.
All in all, the Seattle Marathon was a terrific experience--I even qualified for Boston during this, my first marathon. I'm eagerly anticipating my next marathon in the spring, and my next Seattle next fall.
By: JOHN CONNOR
Posted: December 02, 2003
Challenging but fun
The weather was perfect. The volunteers were great... you cannot do a marathon without them. I cannot thank them enough. Only negative was that the soup was gone before I finished, but I guess I have to run faster...
By: Dave Niles
Posted: December 02, 2003
Topnotch work!
This was my second marathon. Although I had to empty my poor college-student bank account to travel to Seattle to run this thing, it was worth every penny. The organization was among the best I've seen in any race, and volunteer and fan support were awesome. It felt like people were genuinely cheering for you. I also enjoyed that after the turn-around we passed people farther back in the race and got to cheer for each other. The only lonely stretches of the course were during the last few miles through a park or something. People complain about the weather being poor, but I find that the cloudiness of every single day in Seattle is perfect for racing. If there's one thing you can count on in Seattle, it's consistent weather.
Although the course was very scenic and beautiful, I did not like that we spent so much time running on concrete. Over a 26.2-mile distance, you can really feel how much harder concrete is than asphalt, and since many of those miles were on the expressway there was no option of finding anything softer.
Overall it was an excellent marathon. I plan to keep coming back for more, and I highly recommend it to both experienced and beginner marathoners.
By: Tim Steege
Posted: December 01, 2003
The best tour of Seattle!
The course is through downtown, then across Lake Washington (with great views of Cascade volcanoes, weather permitting), then along a very pretty lakefront road to and around Seward Park, then back up the lake to a tough 1/2 mile hill and then through the Arboretum. Then it winds along a country road in the middle of the city, and finally breaks out into views of the Space Needle and Puget Sound and the Olympic Mountains. We had a spectacular day and the organization was perfect. 2,325 runners made it uncrowded but with plenty of people to run with. I loved it! Hard course to PR on, though, with hills late in the course.
By: Joe B.
Posted: December 01, 2003
A perfect day for a marathon
Maybe the weather in 2002 was an anomaly (see earlier comments). If so, then we're getting a string of anomalies here! The weather was FANTASTIC! The sun was out, the air was crisp, and the sky was absolutely clear. In short, it was gorgeous! It was a perfect day for a marathon.
I'm not much for the course (the best course I've run in Seattle was in the Goodwill Games marathon open to the public in '90... a great tour of the city). This course was okay. There weren't many spectators out in Seattle on a cold, late fall Sunday morning, but if your looking for a good off-season marathon in the Pacific Northwest to work off all that turkey you ate, this is a great one.
By: Steve C.
Posted: December 01, 2003
Well organized race
The race lucked out again for 2003, with great weather (just some wind to contend with). Everything was very well organized. The expo was bigger than I expected, with lots of free samples. The course was very scenic with good volunteer support. The first 20 miles were reasonable, but the last 6 were much hillier than I expected with a couple of real killers in there! The only slight disappointment was the fan support. With such nice weather in a running town, I expected a few more spectators out there. I highly recommend this marathon, but be sure to save your energy for those last 6 miles!
By: Toni B.
Posted: October 19, 2003
A wonderfully organized race!
I have run the half marathon three times ('99 - 01) - my first race ever - and volunteered the last two years due to injury. (This will be the first year that I'm not involved with the race at all). I've been part of the planning process for this race and the people at the Seattle Marathon spend a year preparing for this race. It's a huge process and they spend a lot of time making sure they cover every detail for the race.
As for the race itself, the views, although sometimes grey, are beautiful. You get to run through the middle of downtown Seattle while watching the sun rise, see Lake Washington and the beautiful homes of that area, run through Seward Park for the full marathon version, proving to yourself that you are a tough human being who can take on any hill in Seattle - and have it reinforced with the awesome welcome into the Memorial Stadium at the finish.
The organizers think of everything and make sure that they see every runner/walker to the finish line. Some of the head organizers have even been known to walk to the finish line from the course with the walkers who are still out there at 4pm. To me, that shows dedication, concern and respect for those who take on the challenge of the Seattle Marathon. Come on out and prove to yourself that you are a tough human being!
By: Tom J.
Posted: February 20, 2003
Rain? What rain?
2002 was a bit of an anomaly, but the usually rainy Seattle weather was bright and sunny. The course is beautiful, crowd sparse but supportive, and the dreaded mile 24 hill not that big a deal. With all the fun things to do in Seattle, great restaurants, etc, this marathon is a must.
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 11, 2002
Gorgeous, but tough
What a wonderful course - one of the most scenic, urban races I've been in ! But, as others will attest, those hills are the end are quite the challenge !
Organization was just fine, but a little on the barebones side -- not really enough bathrooms, only one food station, and little entertainment (other than the scenery !).
For such a nice day, it was surprising that there were so few spectators.
RECOMMENDED !
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 05, 2002
Isn't it suppose to be raining here?
A large part of this marathon is along the waterfront which makes for some very beautiful scenery. There are some hills in the first part of the race and then it's flat for about 10 miles. The drawback, however, are the hills at the end, with the biggest hill right around mile 22 or 23. Not a good place for a hill if you ask me.
This was my first time running the Seattle marathon and I was expecting a cold and rainy race like it's been the years before. However, the weather was clear and somewhat mild. Around 45 degress. I think that's a little uncharacteristic for the pacific northwest this time of year.
The race was well organized and started on time. The course is well marked as are the mile markers, although they are low signs, so you can't see them from very far away, which can be good or bad. The volunteers were great as were the fans that came out, but don't expect huge crowds.
The finish is fun because you run into Memorial stadium through the middle of the field and down the chute with your name being announced over the loudspeakers while the crowd cheers. I'll certainly run it again next year, although i'll be expecting the rain.
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 04, 2002
Great Run, Beautiful Course
What a beautiful day for a marathon and a beautiful city to run it in. Couldn't have asked for better weather, cool, but sunny. Shaved 15 minutes off my usual finish time even with the hills! For Seattle, the course was fairly flat, only a few hills, but a couple of killers. Especially just before mile 26! Whew! I highly recommend this one, although I could have used a space blanket after my finish...they ran out. At least they didn't run out of the clam chowder from Ivars...fantastic!
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 02, 2002
Spectacular race!
I just ran Seattle as my second marathon and I loved it! I had totally psyched myself out after reading the comments on this website so I was dreading the weather and the hills at the end. As it turned out, we couldn't have been luckier with the weather - sunny and cool but not too cold. The course was great and I actually thought the spectators were pretty decent too. Also, maybe it was because I trained in San Francisco but the hills were no big deal. I set a PR by 45 minutes but I guess that's not hard to do on your second attempt. I still don't know that I'd recommend this race because the weather is not likely to be this cooperative every year. Also, it's definitely not for first timers.
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 02, 2002
The weather was perfect!
This was my first marathon and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Up until the race I was expecting horrible weather and few spectators. On the day of the race I experienced the exact opposite. The weather was unusually nice for a Seattle day in December, partly cloudy skies although crisp but that was okay. There were plenty of water/power aid stations and even a 'Power Gel' station around mile 19 or 20 which was good for me because I had just used my last packet of GU a couple of miles back. Prior to this race I came to this website to educate myself on what to expect for the Seattle Marathon. I also believe that the organizers of the race here as well because a few of the issues that people raised about last year's race were taken care of. For example I was very pleased with the shirts. This time instead of the drab black shirts with gold lettering we were issued blue techincal fabric shirts (flooded with corporate sponsors as to be expected) which I was impressed to see. There were also water/power aid tables located at the end of the finish line whereas last year I heard/read that people had to go to the upper half of the stadium to get post race necessities. But this year they were handing out Ivar's clam chowder, coffee, and you could buy post race accessories like t-shirts, etc.-nothing you would need immediately after the race. One bit of advice that I received before the race that proved true is that the weather is unpredictable. Well this time the pendulum swung in the favor of the runners and spectators. My first marathon was a very memorable experience. I was advised by several people that the Seattle Marathon is a horrible first marathon but I had a great time. I would recommend it to others just relax and have a good time. Don't worry about getting passed up or anything, remember it's your race. You have the receipt to prove it. I can guarantee challange for sure, but I can't guarantee the weather.
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 02, 2002
Weather Lucky! Course Spectacular!
On a scale of 1-10, the weather was 11! It was sunny Saturday and 44 degrees, dry and calm at 5:30 a.m. Sunday morning. It remained sunny throughout the marathon course and the last half, which goes along Lake Washington out to Seward Park and back was spectacular. Like others, I didn’t appreciate the 200-feet of climb between mile 20 and 21 or the rolling hills through mile 23, but the rest was relatively downhill until dipping down and up the railroad viaduct just before the 26-mile marker. Not my best marathon, but I was with two people who did PRs who had no such intention prior to the start. Too bad the bad-weather history of the event keeps locals away from being spectators, but I can’t fault that nor would I suggest changing the date after doing it for 33 years. They got over 10,000 participants this year for all four events and I’d expect that to skyrocket after the word of this year’s weather gets out. This marathon is a perfect combination of city and nature run. The start at Seattle Center and Finish in Memorial Stadium right next door make this one to run for any serious marathoner.
By: Anonymous
Posted: November 04, 2002
Beautiful Course--but not a good first time run
I have run Seattle twice (99 & 01) It's a beautiful course, however, there should definately be a proviso on those hills at the end!! The first year I ran it, it was much less rainy than last year. The sun actually shone if I recall correctly, so it is possible to have almost decent weather...
My main reason for commenting is I ran Seattle after running Portland the year before. If it had been my first Marathon I would've been terribly disappointed in how I was treated at the end. It seems to be more geared to 1/2 Marathon finishers as by 5hrs there is next to no one at the finish to cheer you. You practically have to ask someone where to get your medal. Then you have to hike stadium stairs for your refreshments. If you are looking for a challenge and don't mind freezing cold and rain--go for it! If you are looking for a first Marathon where you are treated like the winner that you are--do Portland, OR first.
By: Anonymous
Posted: July 22, 2002
Welcome to Pac NW. Wipe the Rain Off Yer Face.
I've run Seattle twice (2000 & 2001), and will run it again a third time in 2003. All the previous comments are correct: It's cold, windy, & rainy. Not a hard pouring rain, but a steady gusty sometimes sleety drizzel. The last eight miles or so are just one hill after another.
2000 was my first marathon, and it was horrible. I didn't have the proper clothes, I hadn't trained properly--it was awful. I wished I was any where in the world; just not Seattle. At about mile 23, I talked to a guy who had torn a hamstring. He told me that he only ran one marathon a year: Seattle. I asked him why did he choose Seattle (only with lots of profanity interspirsed). He said 'If you're only going to run one marathon a year, might as well make it a tough one.' I knew then I'd be back next year, and the year after.
Seattle is a fun, beautiful city. Lots to do & see. The run across the floating bridge to Mercer Island is a blast.
They'll never change the date, or the course. It's always going to be wet, cold, miserable, and uphill at the end.
Don't miss this marathon!
By: Anonymous
Posted: July 17, 2002
What? A marathon is going on right now? BRRR!
Well, first off, don't expect many people along the course during this race. It's almost GUARANTEED TO BE RAINING!!! I think any potential spectators are inside sipping coffee. Be prepared to wake up to a drab dreary day and being at the starting line before daybreak.
The course itself is a gutbuster. They throw in a mammoth size hill at mile 19 to completely demoralize you. TRAIN ON HILLS! It is through some beautiful parks and across the floating bridge and back. That part was nice except for the hypothermia that will inevitably set in by the time you are halfway done. The finish is the cool part when you get to run into a stadium, albeit one that is COMPLETELY EMPTY! Post-race grub is fine.
Kudos: The shirts are great but you could jazz 'em up a little instead of the black and brown I've seen that last two years. Great volunteers that wrapped me in blankets and fed me chicken soup so I could recover from my 92 deg. body temperature. Good race expo.
Gripes: CHANGE THE DATE OF THE RACE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! It is rainy in Nov/Dec in Seattle. It's on a Sunday. The course is killer. Locals don't have a clue that there is a Seattle Marathon. It's cold and rainy. Did I mention that?
By: Anonymous
Posted: January 06, 2002
Gotta love those hills
It would appear the Marathon is one of Seattles best kept secrets, not even our cab drivers were familiar with it and we took a few. Seattle was beautiful, weather was as usual (I'm told) raining. The run across the floating bridge to Mercer Island was lots of fun, we cheered on all the front runners as they were coming back across the bridge. The spectators were few, the view was incredible. Not my best time for sure - and who put all those blessed hills at the end.
By: Anonymous
Posted: November 30, 2001
Beautiful but challenging
Although I set a PR in this race, I found the last six miles really challenging. My post-race recovery was much longer than any of my previous 7 marathons. Although scenic, this is not the ideal race course for potential Boston qualifiers.
The crowds were enthusiastic for such a cold and rainy day. A few areas for future improvement would be the t-shirts (perhaps a more useful running shirt in a synthetic fabric (PowerDry or CoolMax) and more basic color), the mile markers (or lack thereof) over the last few miles (echoing a previous runner's comment)and the lack of any food or other non-liquid support at the aid stations along the way. With GU as a sponsor, I had hoped for more than the single aid station which provided it.
Overall, however, a very positive experience and a race that I will recommend to others.
By: Anonymous
Posted: November 29, 2001
Seattle is a challenge...
The course ain't for wimps. I didn't see all the mile markers. I liked finishing in the stadium, and having a heated area with hot soup.
Mark the course better next time, please.
By: Anonymous
Posted: November 29, 2001
Course challenging and scenic
Cool temperature and rain at the start. I very much enjoyed the marathon and the city of Seattle's beautiful area. Two complaints poor local coverage of the marathon by media and newspaper. Secondly the T-Shirts needs more WOW! color design etc...
By: Anonymous
Posted: September 07, 2001
This lonely run makes you dig deep
Amazing run. It was rainy and cold (got bad around mile 22). My left foot dropped into a pot-hole puddle on mile 16. I should have been looking - but I was wiping the rain from my face at the time. The people I met were great along the way. It seemed like the weather and the conditions of the run brought out the best in the crowd I was running alongside. I will be back; despite it's challenges, the run made me dig deep.
By: Anonymous
Posted: March 30, 2001
Seattle is a great place to run.
Remember, it's not the weather, the hills, the water stations, the time clocks. It's the 26.2 miles and Seattle has 26.2 beautiful miles. Just bring warm dry clothes for after the race. I ran last year--it was cold, raining, and it was great! If you can run up the hill on Madison you're good, you're real good. Looking for a challenge? Run Seattle. Great place to visit. Lots to do and see. Don't let that earthquake thing scare you; I survived it too.
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 07, 2000
I'll be there next Year!
The course was spectacular. It was a cold rainy day and many thanks to the volunteers who kept me motivated, hydrated, and gued up all the way.
Upon finishing all I wanted was a warm place to rest and something hot to drink. The recovery area was cold and there was nothing hot to drink. It would have been a good idea to put chicken broth or cider in large containers for everyone to enjoy.
By: Anonymous
Posted: December 02, 2000
Above average with plenty of room for improvement
I recently ran the beautiful, but relatively tough, Seattle Marathon. The downtown start was nice, and there were gorgeous sections over the floating bridge, along Lake Washington, in Seward Park, and through the Arboretum. Late November weather in the PNW is unpredictable, and this year was no different, with breezy to gusty winds, and a steady drizzle over the last half of the race. For those looking for more optimum conditions, the Seattle race most years would not be accomodating. The course has a long, essentially flat middle section, with early and late hills (both up and steep downs)which make logging a PR unlikely. The large, indoor warm-up and recovery area was nice, and made gear check-in/out quite easy, and the start line was only a short walk away. I had no trouble with the bus service, either to or from the event. Organization on the course was at times weak, with misplaced or absent mileage markers and almost non-existent split times (which I normally don't mind, but my watch cut off at the 15 mile mark during the race). Water stations were about every 2 miles, though generally not located where the event info catalog said they would be. Cleaning up the on course glitches, and putting water stations every mile to add more flexibility to runners hydration needs would help.
By: Anonymous
Posted: November 28, 2000
rainy with little crowd support
It would have been better to leave a longer gap between the start-time for the walkers and the 1/2 marathon runners, because it was fairly crowded between miles 2 and 4. The course was lovely, but lonely. There were few spectators and lots of rain drops. It would also have been better if the last bus back to race headquarters had been later.
By: Anonymous
Posted: October 14, 2000
What could be the perfect marathon
Seattle is a beautiful city and the marathon route certainly offers picturesque scenery and a very enjoyable coarse. One can only wonder why in a climate favorable to ideal marathoning conditions during much of the year, the event is held at the end of November. This is a date that has a strong likelihood of cold pacific rains, clouds obstructing much of the scenic mountain views, and winds mixing in with that rain to make what could be one of the best marathoning experiences truly miserable. That was the 1998 experience, and it is not unreasonable to expect the same often at that time of year in Seattle. The event was so well planned and executed... what a shame that it had to be sabotaged by weather. Hopefully the organizers will someday realize the flaw in their planning and find a better time of year to stage this event.
By: Anonymous
Posted: August 17, 2000
The best of times, and not the worst of times!
Is there a better way to see Seattle than with a group of thousands of other runners? If so I've not found it. A couple years ago I traveled from Indianapolis to visit two very wonderful friends and we ran a wonderful marathon--the Seattle Marathon. It rained and was cold, yet the events of that marathon weekend stand as one of the best memories I hold from 1998. Would I do this race again? Certainly! Would I recomend this race to others? Absolutely! Will I run the Seattle Marathon this year? I'm absolutely certain I will!