Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Portland Marathon
Back

Portland Marathon - Race Reviews

3.9
Average rating based on 295 Reviews

By: Scott C.

Posted: October 10, 2019

Awesome all the way around!

The all new Portland Oregon marathon is fantastic. Everything about it is a huge upgrade from the old days. Fantastic course. Great Swag. FREE Photos. No getting ripped off and gouged. Great finish area festivities on Portland's waterfront. JOIN ME FOR 2020! I've run over 190 marathons. This is in the top ten.
5.0

By: Rebekah H.

Posted: November 28, 2017

This is a poor excuse of a race

2016 was my third time running the Portland Marathon... and my last. As mentioned by others, the expo is in a parking garage... come on. There's no bag check at the race, frustrating when it rains on race day. The organizers will say 'well it likely won't rain, so no need for bag check'... but that doesn't help when it does rain. It poured race day and when I crossed the finish line, I was so cold and asked the first aid booth for any type of blanket, hand warmers, something to help me warm up. They told me to keep walking... really helpful. The 2016 course, going up through north Portland was great, a portion I know they've removed since then... too bad, as that was my favorite part of the race (fantastic spectators and views). Out and back courses aren't a great way to show off your city, especially along an industrial highway (the current course). Let's also not forget to mention the fact that they took us off course at the beginning of the 2016 race, adding 0.5 miles to the total length of the marathon, but the race organizers never took responsibility. The race organizers rarely respond to questions via email or social media... really frustrating to those traveling for a race. There are so many other fall races, don't bother with this one... find another. Run on!
3.0

By: Wayne Wright

Posted: November 11, 2017

Still in Bloom

INTRODUCTION: I am a race-walker with a median marathon completion time of 5:18:47. The Portland Marathon was my forty-sixth 26.2-miler accomplished. COURSE: It was a perfect day for a marathon: weather at the start line was 48 degrees, 93 percent relative humidity, calm and partly cloudy. Unique to marathon events, it was we who sang The Star-Spangled Banner prior to race start in downtown Portland. Two blocks in, our mostly out-and-back course turned north on Northwest Naito Parkway / Northwest Front Avenue, alongside the Willamette River, for the first three miles. Backtracking south to Northwest Nicolai Street, but for a slight detour, we headed west until rounding north on Northwest Saint Helens Road at mile 5. At mile 6, we parted ways with the half-marathoners and our course narrowed down to one lane for marathoners travelling both outbound and return. Prior to mile 9, we encountered our biggest ascent, about a 100 foot climb which culminated at the crest of the Saint John's Bridge approximately one mile later. At this point, looking right we had our best view of downtown skyline. On the other side of the bridge, we spent most of our time on North Willamette Boulevard, passing by University of Portland, and further along, on a bluff overlooking the Willamette River, giving us another glimpse of Portland. We turned around halfway between miles 13 and 14 at North Jessup Street and mostly retraced our steps back to the start line on Southwest Salmon Street between Southwest 2nd Avenue and Southwest 3rd Avenue. Finish line temperature was 59 degrees, 60 percent relative humidity, calm with few clouds. ORGANIZATION: Well executed. Packet pickup at the Hilton Portland Downtown was efficient; included in our premium was an event poster. Superb course support, and although no gels were given, crews handed out cups full of gummy bears and pretzels. Beginning with congratulations by the race director at the finish line, we receive not only our medal, but a coin and pendant bearing the same design, a rose, a tree seedling, and a long-sleeve finisher shirt. Excellent food and drink assortment as well, including, rare to find in marathon finishes, chocolate milk. SPECTATORS: Typical fan support for a marathon of this size. The most excellent and diverse assortment of musical ensembles seen anywhere to date, including in the first mile, a drum corps whose sound was amplified by the Morrison Bridge, which they were positioned underneath. CONCLUSION: A lot has been written about the difficulty surrounding this year's marathon. Fortunately, none of this was in evidence during the event weekend. The organizers did a magnificent job pulling this one off. Yes, it may be disappointing a more scenic marathon course was not used, but given the choice between the course we traversed and no course at all, one should be grateful to the residents of this city to be able to continue the tradition. Well done, Portland. POSTSCRIPT: Race-walkers are few and far between in events such as these, and rarer still is to find one of similar ability. It was a pleasure to share the course with Judy between miles 2 and 3, and later on between miles 13 and 18.
4.0

By: wende C.

Posted: October 30, 2017

Nice come back job race committee!

Despite all the challenges surrounding the 2017 race, this marathon was fantastic! Organization was superb! The volunteers were more than plentiful, and so helpful. I was hoping for a more scenic route, but other than that, it was a crazy-fun and well-run marathon. LOVED all the great swag at the end too! Thank you !
4.0

By: Ki V.

Posted: October 11, 2017

Fast course, but not pretty

The out-and-back wasn't very scenic (as people acknowledge) but I seemed to like the race more than most. The months leading up to the race were a train wreck - with permit denials and DOJ investigations - but race day went pretty well. The course had very few turns and was mostly flat. There weren't a ton of spectators but the ones that were there were great, and the numerous bands were a nice distraction though some were pretty weird. The second half of the course was pretty empty even though I finished well in the first half of the pack. Got stuck behind a pace group for a couple of miles on the part that runs on the narrow highway shoulder between 7 and 9. An extra lane closure would have been nice. Great medal, great volunteers, and grilled cheese at the finish line were all bonuses.
3.0

By: Rick g.

Posted: October 09, 2017

I don't like the out and back course

The Portland Marathon is my home town race. It was my first marathon, and this is where I ran my PR. So I have fond memories of the old loop course. I don't like the new, out and back course. In general I prefer loop courses over boring out and back courses. Just running St. Helen's Road once is bad enough. Now you have to run it again on the return. You need to be careful running down the steep hill from the St. John's bridge on the way back. The Portland Marathon is not a bad race. It's just not as good as it once was.
3.0

By: Mike J.

Posted: October 08, 2017

Out and back course. Not scenic. Wrong mileage?

Volunteers and entertaintment was awesome. Water stations and snacks were great! Running an extra 'spur' out and back just to get the right mileage was kind of weird. Hopefully the race is improved next year. Portland is a great City and the race has so much potential. I'll be back. One last probably trivial thing and I've seen this at other races. Who in the world picks out the T shirt colors? With all the great primary colors- why nursery room pastel teal? I'll never wear this thing, not to play golf, not to the sports bar, not to mow the lawn and definitely not to work. The half marathon shirt was great, basic blue good for everyone that entered. Even blacks and greys are good colors, don't overthink it.
3.0

By: Gerard K.

Posted: December 05, 2016

Terrible Organization - Major Disappointment

It is shameful that the organizers have tried to minimize the fact that, through their own incredible incompetence, they added 1/2 mile to the course for LOTS (not just the few they claimed) of the runners (myself included). I wouldn't have been nearly as disappointed if they had just come out and said, 'We screwed up. We're really sorry.' I expected so much more from the state that is the epicenter of distance running in this country. Sad. I'm working on 50 states, so now I can cross Oregon off my list. However, I'm never going back to that race - and I advise other runners to avoid it like the plague. The volunteers and fans, on the other hand, were great. The rain didn't stop them from doing everything they could to support the runners.
2.0

By: Michael McAndrew

Posted: November 15, 2016

Portland Miserable Marathon1

Poorly organized, no bag check, 1/2 mile added to course, had to run right next to car lane through industrial area, no race officials available. Very weak expo in cold parking garage. No place for cover at end of race when it was raining hard. They did have great music and some diehard fans along the way in the rain but could not make up for this poorly administered event. I believe this was my last Portland Marathon. They need to reorganize!
2.0

By: Matthew M.

Posted: October 24, 2016

OK race, not worth the money

This was my 25th marathon and I have enjoyed every race I have ran. This race was no different; there was a lot that was great and I had a wonderful time. The weather sucked, but that was nobody's fault and I have ran in much worse. Running an extra 1/2+ mile was something that could have been avoided and was very frustrating. I was unable to see any mile markers for the first 3 miles. When I finally did see one at mile 4, I thought my pace was very slow and it really threw me off for the rest of the race. It would be nice if the mile markers were more prominently displayed. The issues the race had with the city of Portland leading up to doubts that the race would even move forward are also troubling. I got on my plane to head to Portland not knowing if the race was even going to happen. The shirt was OK, the medal was cool, and all the 'extras' were very cool. All in all, not a bad race. But, for paying $150, I expected better organization.
3.0

By: Allyn Snowhite

Posted: October 17, 2016

It was tough; but I thoroughly enjoyed the race.

I understand why the alternate route was required, but I feel it was unfair to the runners and walkers who had to use it. We were required to stop at all traffic lights which really added to our times. If at all possible, it would be much better if a street route could be used for future races.
4.0

By: Robert R.

Posted: October 11, 2016

Unbeatable Swag! Great Location. OK Marathon

Portland is one of the most beautiful cities in the world. Scenic Mt Hood towers over the hipster cityscape and a visit to the Colombia River Valley needs to be on everyone's bucket list! Great Wineries surround the city itself and amazing vistas await you on the nearby Oregon Coast. Thus as a destination Marathon few places can compete with Portland. The race also has great swag for bling chasers like me. The finishers' medal and other keepsakes are phenomenal and worth the price of admission all by themselves. The reputation as the best swag Marathon in the country is well deserved. But as a stand alone Marathon, Portland is a little disappointing. The course itself is not so scenic. There is a long industrial out and back section that makes up a lot of the race. If you know a lot of the people running in the event then I suppose it might be fun to see them during these miles. But as an out-of-town visitor there is nothing to distract you from the mind-numbingly boring landscape. Running over the bridges and along the upscale neighborhoods on the bluffs was great, but all too short, and was immediately followed by more dull industrial sites. In a city that has such a vibrant downtown, not to mention the wonders of Washington Park right at your fingertips, why not reinvent the course to showcase the best of what the city has to offer. Other marathons in cities far less blessed with such abundant natural beauty as Portland manage to find interesting and scenic courses. Maybe it's time Portland reimagines it's Marathon much as LA did a few years ago. And I've not even mentioned the disaster with the course this year. Every corral after corral B ran a very long course. There was supposed to be a turn on Counch St off of 4th St at about mile 0.6. There was no one there to guide the runners to make that turn after the first 2 corrals went by, so we all ran the full length of 4th street and added an extra 0.6 miles to our journey (roughly.) Accidents happen, but that turn should have been well staffed and well marked as it was the first major turn in the race and it is easy to see how it could be missed in the pre-dawn darkness. So,bottom-line, Portland is a great place with great swag and a supportive and vigorous running community that could put this race on the top tier of running events. It only lacks a great course and a few more details attended to like well marked turns, diversion of light rails during race hours, spectator friendly finishers area, and a little work on the expo (confusing.) Portland has a lot of potential! I hope I get a chance to see the day Portland takes those bold steps needed to showcase all it has to offer the world. I'll be first in line!
4.0

By: Steve R.

Posted: October 10, 2016

Over-rated and disappointing race

Unfortunately, this marathon is over-rated. It touts awards such as 'best organized', best in October, etc. but the reality is that it is simply mediocre at best. There are numerous reasons: 1. Organization: Overall, it was fine, but there is no bag drop. They say this is because of security, but there is NO security at the start - people were just wandering in and out wherever, no one checking anything, so clearly it is just about making their logistics easier. On a rainy day like yesterday was, no bag is a disaster. Advertising for a local running company to charge $10 to store a bag the day before is ridiculous. 2. Transportation to start: The 'strongly encourage' taking public transportation to the start by 6am. However, there is NO public transportation running that will get you there by then! When I asked the about this, they suggested I get an Uber (don't do this - unavailable and expensive surge pricing!). 3. Course: I used to live in Portland, so I know it is a truly beautiful city. The course manages to show none of this. Most of the course is industrial areas with train tracks and warehouses. Ugly, often smelly. Water stops were poorly organized, too few, too small, and erratically spaced - sometimes very close together, other times several miles apart. The course featured Ultima drink - this is a sugar-free drink. Personally, I think it tastes bad, but also: why a sugar free drink on a marathon? We need the calories. Spectator support was non-existent (it was a rainy day, but, miles of the course runs along highways and spectators are banned anyway, so regardless of weather, you won't have people cheering most of the way). Do not be fooled by the course elevation: it is a hard course - the hill up to St. John's bridge is long and steep and very tough. The view from the bridge is pretty great. 4. Finish Area: chaotic. I had to ask for a medal and the disposable jacket thing they were giving out (which is nice - I will save it and use it at my next pre-race). Dixie cups of water or ultima were available right at the finish, then no further drinks (other than chocolate milk) available anywhere. They had animal cookies and twizzlers, but no water?? My advice to the organizers: Save the flowers, tree saplings (yes, they handed out roses and baby trees; I don't know about you but when I've just finished a marathon, nothing helps me recover like a sapling!), coins and pendants, and replace it with a simple bottle of water. It was raining hard all day, so everything was soaking wet - rain isn't their fault, but Portland is well known for being rainy and it often rains on race day. Not being prepared for rain IS their fault: because of no bag check, you have nothing dry to change into, and the shirt they gave out was wet. So I was forced to remain cold and wet until I could get all the way back to my car. Bottom line: Skip it. There are so many other fall marathons that beat this one. It just isn't worth the time and effort.
2.0

By: Maria W.

Posted: October 09, 2016

Great race but organizer don't care

DO NOT RUN THIS RACE IF IT IS YOUR FIRST RACE! This race does not care about its racer. I don't think this race cares about their racers. I will start with what is good. Whats good 1. The volunteers are troopers it was 45 degree and raining the whole race. They were troopers being outside supporting the runner. The water station was every mile which is great! 2. Smaller race and the corrals were spread out pretty well. There is also official pacers who are awesome! What is bad 1. The package pick up was not easy to figure out. especially when i need to change from a full to half cause of unforeseen medical issues with a doctor note. They wanted 150 dollars change fee in the name of charity. It seem like very deep I end up paying 300 dollars for a half marathon. I think this race organizers are greedy. 2. the race markers are white and small you can barely tell. On some of them it is hard to see. They could spend a little more money on that. its been 45 years in the making come on! 3. They need to have more official race people instead solely dependent on volunteers. My husband had hyperthermia because of the weather asking people to help him. The volunteers turned him away he couldn't find a single official to help him. He just wander around in the cold for 40 minutes by himself. This is super dangerous for race participant. This race does not care about its runners and again lack of official organizer people at the finishing line shows again they DON't care about their racers. He is not alone. I talked to multiple people who said the finishing line was so disorganized.
3.0

By: Cooper B.

Posted: October 09, 2016

A little overpriced and over rated

The Portland Marathon wants you to believe it is a destination race. It has a few deficiencies and doesn't live up to the hype. Pros: 1. Good start and finish area. 2. Course support and entertainment was good. Cons: 1. The expo needs to move to a better location. 2. The course is below average which was made worse by the rain. 3. The weather was bad on race day.
3.0

By: James S.

Posted: October 10, 2015

Good, not great race in great city

I went out too fast on a warm, sunny day and the steep climb at mile 17 bonked me for good but, other than the inopportune bridge climb, I thought the course was pretty fast and at times scenic. Expo was okay but it remains a little weird that they hand out bags at the end of it. Didn't get caught by the trains but it's hard to understand why a big city marathon would even have that as a potential problem. Really nothing quaint about it and very 1926 for a metro race. Fan participation was good in the last few miles and thought the finish line food/drink was adequate, although bottles of water would have been good because a lot of folks (like myself) overheated. There is zero shade on the course for 26.2 so it's easy to get a little hot on a sunny day. Was my first trip to Portland and loved the city, although the trip is very pricey coming from the East. Our hotel was stupid expensive. On the plus side, the rail system is wonderful and you don't need a car, and the restaurants are great.. Overall the race is probably a bit overrated by national running publications but it's one I'd probably do again sometime if I had the chance
3.0

By: Scott C.

Posted: October 10, 2015

Some Great things a few clunkers

103rd marathon 8th Portland marathon. What I love about Portland: Course Finishers shirt at the finish! New medal is great. Better entertainment than a Rock-N-Roll, BY FAR! No finisher's mylar; a good disposable jacket instead. MUCH easier to manage. Well organized start, even with all those 1/2 marathoners I love the out-n-back at mile 7-10, you get to watch for all your friends, see the leaders, etc. NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Expo in the Hilton parking garage. YUCK. Nobody allowed at the finish line. HEY, move the finish out to your awesome waterfront just 2 blocks away! I've done this 8 times and never been stopped by a heavy train and only once very briefly by the light rail. Maybe I have good luck.
5.0

By: Richard M.

Posted: October 09, 2015

Wish there were more and better spectators

Pros: - Well organized race - The loop course made getting to and from the start finish very easy. It allows out-of-towners to relax in their hotel room and use the bathroom much easier than having to wait forever for porta potties. - The St Johns bridge was cool to go over. - I thought the course was solid. It's tough and isn't very fast but there is a nice downhill around 22-23 that is a nice little boost heading to the end. Some have complained about the course but I think it's very good. If they were to have it routed elsewhere in the city it would be a very hilly and very difficult course that not to many people would be thrilled about running. It's tough enough as is. The only issue I think people could have with the course would be the out and back among the warehouses, but that is early on in the race and the last 15 miles or so are really nice. - Someone giving out beer at about mile 23. - Lots of food and drinks at finish. - Weather was perfect. - Lots of on-course bands and music playing throughout. - Corrals worked well - Large race without being overwhelmingly huge. - I actually liked the half marathoners being with us the first 10 miles. CONS - They give you a lot of stuff at the finish but I didn't find a bag or anything to put it in. Carrying a shirt, rose, medal, coin, pendant, tree and the food and drink I was trying to take didn't work out very well. - The lack of a gear check is only bad if you did not stay nearby. If you're from out of town and staying downtown it really doesn't matter. - No spectators allowed in the finishing chute!!! I don't understand this one at all. There are a bunch of fans and then you turn the last corner and they don't allow people in. This needs to change. - Spectator enthusiasm and support was only marginal. At times it was good and others completely vacant. They close off sections of the course to specters for some reason, the bridge included. - Trains. I did not get stopped personally but the #4 female in front of my got stopped for about 15 seconds by a light rail train at about mile 24.5. I caught her as did the #5 woman but she powered on and still beat us both. That would be frustrating and there appeared to be multiple places where that could happen. - No Beer garden afterward! In a city like Portland, that should be a major draw for the Marathon. Overall it is a very good race to run. If you are looking to get your first BQ or a PR, there are better choices on this weekend. If you are looking for a good size marathon, a good overall experience and a well run race this is a good choice.
4.0

By: Mike W.

Posted: October 08, 2015

Average medium city marathon, but not great

I read most all of the reviews, so I sort of knew what I was getting. That said... This was my 75th marathon or ultra, and I've run a lot of medium-sized city marathons, and overall this one really ranks average at best. It reminded me of Charleston for the amount of industrial running, and Charlottesville, VA for being over-rated. The course overall isn't that attractive, and while the bands were fun on the first half, there were very few in the second half. Ultima and NO gels is below average for course support. And I've been at 5K's with better food at the end. Since I'm not a big schwag guy, the overabundance of schwag didn't offset any of this for me. What really got me though is as I was hammering in the final couple miles to hit a time goal, several of us were stopped around Mile 25 by a police officer to let cars through. That is just ridiculous for a professionally organized marathon. Their marketing seems to be cutesie around 'you might be stopped by trains, some people consider it quaint', but it's not acceptable, the course should be closed for the runners. Overall, I say come to Portland, enjoy a wonderful city, get out to the Gorge, go see Mt. Hood. And maybe run the marathon. But, I'll still consider it one of the most overrated races I've done, and I've done hundreds.
3.0

By: Donna M.

Posted: October 08, 2015

Great event in a great city

The PM is extremely well organized. The volunteers were attentive and dedicated. The start was seemless and well designed. Aid station were plentiful and well stocked. I have read a few critical reviews of the course, to which I say, you've got to be kidding. It incorporates an urban area with tons of spectators, a river front, a suspended bridge and residential neighborhoods. Sure there are industrial areas too...get over it. Its a marathon not Disney. Overall I was humbled by the generosity and dedication of organizers, spectators and volunteers. Some criticize the lack of gu on the course. So bring your own. No big deal. I found that the salt and carbs of the pretzels helped me and I carried shot blocks. The Chinese drums early in the race are amazing. Imagine a sleepy city street on sunday morning and booming drums resonating through the street. Pretty amazing. Thank you Portland. Beware of the St Johns hill - It's no joke but the bridge is worth it. Last comment...maybe I missed it but I didn't see any water at the finish. I would have killed for a water bottle walking back to my hotel but there was plenty of food even for a late finisher like me.
4.0

By: Judy Fisher

Posted: October 07, 2015

My 100th Marathon!

Exceptional! That's why I decided to make this marathon my 100th. The organization, encouragement and excitement of the volunteers, the bling, and the weather (at least this year) couldn't be better. The Rose City does treat every finisher as a winner!
4.0

By: Daren B.

Posted: October 07, 2015

Good race except for train stoppages

Pros: 1. Nice organization at the start, corral system worked very well. 2. Aid stations and port-a-potties were plentiful. 3. Plenty of supportive spectators, although as others have commented the first half is mostly through a not-at-all scenic industrial area with little to no spectators. Worth it to get to the St. Johns bridge I guess, as someone else commented. Cons: 1. TRAINS TRAINS TRAINS! They down play the trains on their publicity, but they seem to affect much more runners than the organizers let on. I was stopped twice, once by an Amtrak and once by the light rail train. You can take their advice and view being stopped by trains as part of the charm of running in Portland. But do not run this race to get a PR and adjust your expectations to being more likely to be stopped than they say. 2. Previously mentioned industrial area. 3. Racing split app they advertised (RaceIT) did not work for anyone in any way. If you're going to go all in on promoting a product make sure it works first. Results on their website were quickly posted, though.
3.0

By: Terry Hill

Posted: November 02, 2014

Good marathon, great town

I flew in for a 4-day weekend of visiting friends, hiking in the Gorge (wonderful Eagle Creek Trail to Punchbowl Falls), revisiting Reed, running the marathon, etc, and had a great time. Splurged on a downtown hotel. Appreciated the comment below (5/1/14) that one can get by without a rental car in Portland. Corrals worked fine for me. Didnt mind the industrial out-and-back. The bands & etc werent as plentiful as in my home marathon (Oakland), but in the first half that doesnt matter so much to me. The 150-foot rise to St. Johns bridge doesnt sound impressive, but its steep enough and far enough in to be non-trivial. If ones primary goal were to PR, there are flatter and faster courses. Great volunteers everywhere, ample aid stations, supportive crowds calling my name (from the bib). I carried my own GU. Never got slowed by cars or trains (train would be horrible, even if not going for PR). There were ample pacers sharing duties in my pace group (3:40), which I appreciated. The weather was unusually warm (70-ish toward the end), so I suffered in the sun after mile 21 and walked up the little rise to the Broadway Bridge. Other than that, the last 5 miles are kind (gentle downhill or flat), so I was able to finish only a minute behind my group. Nice finishers shirt. While not a destination marathon like Boston, this marathon is very well organized and not overly challenging, so the combination of a good marathon and a great town is very attractive. Im likely to return.
4.0

By: Scott W.

Posted: October 22, 2014

Good but not great.

Overall a good experience, but I found many of the mile markers were off or hard to see through the first 10 miles. My splits were all over the place based on the mile markers so I merged into the 3:10 pace group four miles in (I was shooting for 3:08 to 3:10). I have run multiple marathons and never had so many mile markers be so far off. 6:30 one mile, 7:30 another mile while running downhill. Even the pacers commented the mile markers were off. I fell a bit back from the 3:10 group just before halfway but still came through the half at 1:33. They were way too fast for folks trying to break 3:10. I expected they would be 1:34 at the fastest. I held on until the last 5 miles where the early pace caught up. I didn't use a GPS watch because they be a bit off, especially with downtown start. I always have pace myself off my watch and what I assume are accurate mile markers. Decent course, but not terribly scenic from miles 5-12. I am more concerned with fast times than scenery so that was okay. I will go back and next time ignore the pace group. Plenty of aid stations but having them mostly on one side of the road made it difficult to get water the first half when the half and marathoners ran together. Give out the shoe bag at the end. They give out too much stuff to carry and I had to wrap it all in my finisher shirt to carry it.
4.0

By: Christopher N.

Posted: October 16, 2014

Great spectators, flat course, little shade

Beautiful city, but I grew up there. Too bad the course doesn't take complete advantage of that. Many great restaurants downtown. Expo seemed a bit cramped in the basement of the Hilton, but not awful. But agree with the comment about no expo bag to drop your gear into. Eventually, there is a kiosk for a bag, but it should be provided with the bib. Spectators were great. Lots of them, cheering folks on. In some neighborhoods, sprinklers and hoses were out to cool us down. (For those of us in Corral H at the end of the race, it was unusually warm.) Other spectators left oranges for runners. Never ate the Gummi Bears provided  and agree with a comment below that no one would train that way. But was pleased by the number of aid stations. They never ran out of liquids, and lots of portapotties. (I've been on some courses where there's just one potty at each aid station. Portland's planning on this front was much better.) The volunteers were always spirited, even 6 hours after the race started. In fact, the volunteers were great. Course is slightly hilly at miles 3-4, then flat till about mile 11 in part through downtown and then later through an industrial area with no shade. Then a slow, gradual incline as you head toward the St. John's bridge at mile 15.5. The half-mile ramp up to the bridge is steep. And then the course is relatively flat till about mile 22 when it goes downhill toward the Broadway Bridge headed into downtown. Not much shade after the St. John's bridge and the finish line. Lots of bands and performers on the entire route, even through the industrial area. Finishers shirt is great. Was hoping the finish line would have had something more substantive to eat other than bananas and a donut hole.
4.0

By: Joshua G.

Posted: October 15, 2014

Great City, Shoddy Logistics

Pros: 1. I really like the city of Portland. 2. All of the volunteers were helpful and friendly. 3. Really cool medal :) Cons: 1. No baggage check. I would have really loved to get a clean shirt or some fresh socks or shoes after the race, but that option was not available. They said only 18% of runners used it. Perhaps those were the out of town runners where it wasn't a nice to have but a necessity. 2. No GU or commercial fuel on the course. Sure gummy bears and pretzels are nice, but no one trains with those. So I got to change the shorts I planned to wear for a new pair with pockets, so I could load my pockets with GU. 3. The expo didn't give you a bag until the end. How does that make sense? They give you bib, pins, etc with no where to put it? I ended up losing the wristbands from the pace group. I am glad I didn't drop anything else while walking through the expo. 4. Beer garden was embarrassing. It was just a parking lot in the sun with a few trucks selling $5 beers. How about you get some sponsors and then give the runners a few beers? Maybe help people celebrate their accomplishment, instead of making them want to leave as soon as possible. 5. Get a more accurate course elevation profile. I picked Portland, because I was trying to PR and overall it looked flat. Turns out mile 16-21 are all uphill and not just a small uphill. Thanks for the bonk!!! 6. EFFING TRAINS!!! Not only did I have to stop for 1 train, but I got caught by a second train at mile 24. I wonder if they know how demoralizing it is to be crushing your goal time and you get to stop to watch a freight train go by. At least stop your city's light rail!
3.0

By: Stephen O.

Posted: October 08, 2014

Disappointing Finish

What if they held a marathon in a major city and did not allow anyone to watch the finish? Yes, that was the Portland Marathon. No spectators were allowed within 200 meters of the Finish Line. No family, no friends, no supporters, no marathon fans. There was an announcer announcing to no one. Instead of cheering crowds at the Finish Line there was a man on the course at mile 26 with a megaphone yelling at the runners to 'run faster!' What if they had a marathon in a major city and the winners of the marathon and other fast marathoners had to weave in an out of really slow half marathoners to get to the Finish Line? Yes, again Portland. No separate Finish Line for the Marathon runners. The Portland Marathon is likely not a bad marathon but the finish was disappointing and anticlimactic making the entire marathon seem disappointing.
3.0

By: Sarah L.

Posted: October 07, 2014

Great crowd support

I may be biased because I PR'ed this course and finally broke 4 hours. The course may not be the most beautiful, but I tend to be one of those runners that zone out no matter where I am. In terms of the topography, it was flat with some rolling hills; the last 8 miles have a lot of gentle downhill stretches. (I tend to do better if there are hills thrown in). What I remember are all the musical acts, cheerleaders, and spectators. During that boring industrial stretch there are people dressed as pirates there for your entertainment. I regret not taking pictures of the Shriners with their calliope. And there were so many random people in the crowd calling out my name and cheering me on; I feel it really boosted me at the end. The weather was perfect. I took no part of the pretzels or gummi bears (strangest course food ever). There is a lot of swag, almost too much. But overall, I had a lot of fun running this marathon and would consider doing it again.
4.0

By: Ron Steinhilber

Posted: October 07, 2014

Well organized, course needs improvement

This was my 23rd marathon, part of my quest to become a 50 stater. There were some good things and some things that need improvement. First, the expo was well organized, had a lot of venders, and wasn't too overcrowded. We went on Friday afternoon, so that may have made a difference. Picking up the number was easy, although having to go to another area to get pins and a bag could be inconvenient for those in a hurry. I had no issues on race day. We arrived at around 5:45, found parking along Clay St. about a 1/2 mile from the start and walked over to my corral. The corrals are a great idea. From my perspective, they worked great. As many others have said, the course was just not that special. Too much industrial, kind of boring at times. It seemed as though the goal was to get the runners to the St. John's Bridge, which was the highlight of the course. I will compliment the race directors on making the back half of the course better than the 1st half, usually it is the opposite, as many races cater to the half marathoners. There were plenty of water stops, although I don't think the Ultima drink was very good. Thanks to all the volunteers who helped out. As far as spectators, there are large sections of the course where there are none, so if you need that kind of support, don't expect that. However, those that were able to get around were great. A special thanks to whomever Gary Gnu is for making the entertaining signs on the back half of the course. All in all, Portland was not a bad experience, I would just have hoped that such a popular (and expensive) race would have been a little better.
4.0

By: Colin D.

Posted: October 06, 2014

Lousy course in beautiful city

For such a great town, I was very disappointed with the route. The first few miles were great, but the rest of the race is along the river in largely industrial parts of Portland. From about Mile 14 to 17 you run along a major highway breathing truck exhaust while climbing uphill. The rest of the race was fine  great crowds, nice people, and a decent, if uninspired expo. But the course leaves something to be desired. I have run 19 marathons and this was by far my least favorite.
3.0

By: Stuart P.

Posted: October 06, 2014

Largely iindustrial course - not walker friendly

After having run New York, London, and Chicago, I walked Portland (b/c of hip issues). I was shocked at the poor organization, lack of meager food (they ran out of pretzels at all but the last stop), change of course *during* the race for the walkers (putting us on sidewalks which beat up our legs), ran out of finishers jackets at end, etc., etc.... I willl definitely not return & look forward to Honolulu and possibly L.A....
3.0

By: Matt A.

Posted: October 05, 2014

Over-hyped race

The hype begins as soon as you go to their website, which refers to their race as the experience of a lifetime. I roll my eyes because the statement is almost laughable. Once you get past the hyperbole, you have a good race (not great) in a pretty hip city. Good weather for this year's race brought out lots of spectators. You get a good goodie bag although the expo needs to be in a better location. The finisher's jacket was a pleasant change from the typical t-shirt.
4.0

By: Dora M.

Posted: July 05, 2014

Superb

Excellent marathon, my first one since 2002! I guess I trained at Andes of Peru, since I was a child I always liked to run at my dads farm fields en Yaquin, Pulunche,... etc
4.0

By: Aaron C.

Posted: May 01, 2014

Excellent city, great race

I planned to run Portland after planning a trip with my wife to explore the city and surrounding areas months in advance. Three months before the race I was told I had a low-grade brain tumor that would need to be resected, which hindered my training (I had hoped to PR). With surgery scheduled for a month after the travel date, I was given clearance by doctors to run the race at a 'leisurely pace,' so I abandoned my hopes for a PR and decided to just enjoy the ride. What a ride it was! The weather was spectacular, as I understand it tends to be this time of year in the pacific NW. The leaves were starting to change and the air was crisp. The expo was fine, a little bit cramped and hot in a hotel basement, but the swag was very nice - 2 tech shirts (short-sleeved participant shirt and long-sleeved finisher shirt) and a neat medal. Also at the end there was a tree seedling which is about right for Portland, and a rose. At the start there were a few motivational words about the Boston marathon, and then a very cool national anthem which was sung by all of us thousands of runners (apparently a tradition that was started a few years ago when there was some kind of mishap with the planned national anthem). Great way to start a race, followed by a beautiful sunrise around mile 4. The first few miles head south out of the city and up into some leafy neighborhoods, with some gentle climbing. Then runners make a u-turn and head back through downtown alongside the Willamette waterfront. Eventually, downtown gives way to the Pearl district, and the Pearl gives way to a very industrial area where runners complete a somewhat lackluster out-and-back that is several miles total. A lot of people have complaints about this part of the course, and I do agree that it is a bit boring and I've never enjoyed out-and-back portions of a race, but Portland does have industrial roots and it's cool to see them as you run past rail yards, warehouses, etc. There is also plenty of entertainment along the way - DJs, bands, pirates shooting off cannons, and the camaraderie and spirit of your fellow runners. After this portion of the race, full marathoners turn right and head back through some shady neighborhoods on the way out of town, ultimately making their way down to St Helens Rd / Hwy 30, which travels northwest along the Willamette River towards the St Johns Bridge. This stretch of the race, miles 13-16 or so, were the worst in my opinion. Rather boring road, little shade, lots of people starting to feel the pain. Around mile 16.5, you turn off on a brutal uphill to take you up to the St Johns Bridge. The climb is painful but the reward is a spectacular view back downriver towards the Portland skyline, with the green hills rising up behind you and Mt Hood out on the horizon like a mirage. From this point you return to town, running along the bluffs on the north side of the river, overlooking downtown. There are some nice views, quaint neighborhoods, and great crowd support along miles 18-21.5. From 21.5 - 23, the course is sparse and fully exposed to the sun. Saw many people hitting the wall in this stretch. At mile 23 you begin to re-enter civilization, and come upon a short, brutal climb up to the Broadway Bridge, which brings you back across the river and into downtown. You wind through downtown until coming back to the finish, essentially where you started. Great crowds for these final two miles. Post-race support is standard, good, string cheese was a highlight. I found a coffee shop and punished their bathroom, then we made our way back to the condo. All in all I believe this a wonderful race, and Portland is a great place to stick around afterwards. It could be a pretty quick course if not for the two painfully-placed climbs. This was certainly not my fastest, for reasons already mentioned, but it was definitely my most meaningful. A month later my brain tumor was resected without incident, and I required no chemo or radiation. Onward to find that PR! (A general comment about Portland - this is probably the easiest city to visit without a rental car besides NYC. We stayed on the riverfront in the Pearl District and could easily walk everywhere, including public transportation which is abundant and mostly clean. We only rented a car to drive out to Multnomah Falls, which is a must-see.)
5.0

By: Emilia S.

Posted: February 12, 2014

Great volunteers, well organized, easy course

I've completed 9 marathons and this is by far my favorite. It is very well organized and the volunteers are awesome! They line most of the course. The course was beautiful and was flat except for one large hill at St. John's Bridge. Water/fuel was more than adequate. The only (small) complaint I have is the reunion area. It's not nearly large enough to host the runners and their families. Other than that, great! I want to do this one every year.
5.0

By: David Hoffman

Posted: November 25, 2013

A Distination Marathon

I've done over 200 and this is one of the better ones. A great city with great restaurants. Great organization. Great medal. Two tech shirts. The course gets the job done going through the Chinatown Arch and over the bridge with a view of Mt. Hood. Almost continuous music with an enjoyable variety The Rosa Hotel was great and a block from the start. Did I mention the great restaurants?.
4.0

By: Kevin K.

Posted: November 11, 2013

Great race bummer about the train

This race was great perfect weather only bummer is the train delay around mile 6. People were running in front of the train I even saw someone get hurt by crossing arm going up and people pushing. Host hotel was great along with places to eat and relax before the race. Runners were definitely awesome cheering each other on and chatting it up. I was in the around 4 hr group pacers were perfect.
4.0

By: Bill B.

Posted: October 15, 2013

Misplaced Priorities

It seems to me that this race is geared for the one and done 'bucket listers.'I really don't need all of the crap that I was given: two shirts (admittedly both very nice), a medal (ok, but I suspect that they are trying too hard to impress), a program, a poster, a coin, a medal, a rose, and a seedling. How about instead lowering the price (I paid at least $140 months before the event) and providing some real food on the course. The only food I saw were Dixie cups of gummie bears and pretzel sticks. I appreciate the neighbors who were giving out fruit. How about having a better course that doesn't include a long, narrow out and back so early in the race. For the second time in the race, I had to dodge and weave crowds with the first 8 miles as we ran along a bleak warehouse district. Also, I thought that the wave system was good, but there were clearly people over-seeded that I had to work around from the third wave. There are some very nice aspects of this race as well. Parts of the course are beautiful and I liked ,maybe the right word is respected, the tough hill at mile 16 to the St John's bridge. The finish was very nice, with cheering crowds and decent food choices. Portland is an interesting city with a good public transit system. Overall, for the money I spent I think that more could have been done to make the actual RUNNING experience better.
3.0

By: Tammy C.

Posted: October 11, 2013

Decent marathon but not as scenic as it could be.

Overall the marathon is a great destination event because of the surrounding area (Columbia River Gorge, Willamette Valley, Mt Hood, etc). It's a great 'bucket list' marathon. Three quick things that I need to point out: 1) it's not as scenic as it could be. If you look at the course map, it looks like you run by the river quite a bit but the view is obstructed by rail yards, etc. I was a bit bummed out. It was pretty industrial. We shared the road with vehicles in many locations as well so that sometimes annoys me because I don't like smelling exhaust. 2) though the race is organized well, I am only giving it three stars because of the packet pick up process. First, the expo and pick up are in the basement of the Hilton which is strange and the layout is not good at all. You walk down a ramp to get your bib # then back up the ramp to get your race packet which was just pins and a t-shirt (no bag). I think the location for the expo needs to change at a minimum. Wow. And they funnel ppl downstairs in single file order so it felt really congested. 3) I was really bummed about the Hilton (host hotel). They were not offering late check out!! With a 7AM wave start and the avg marathon time being over four hours, that gives ppl no time to get back and get showered/changed. They were telling ppl to checkout, leave their luggage at the front desk area and then when you get back, you can use the athletic club for showering. Seriously??? I've never had this experience with a host hotel. I begged the Hilton folks even for 15 mins extra but they said they'd charge me if I don't leave my room. I found a way to work around it and actually got an extra 20 minutes, thank goodness. But I was rushing and worried about getting a knock on the door. There are other places to stay that are just as close. TIPS: The city blocks are 1/2 of what a normal city block is so when you look at a map, don't worry about picking one that is six blocks away from the start/finish. The Heathman, Paramount, Monaco, Marriott Courtyard and Marriott are all good ones.
4.0

By: Joe S.

Posted: October 11, 2013

Great city, below average course

As scenic and beautiful as Portland is, I was extremely disappointed with the course. A good portion of the race is through a boring industrial area with nothing to see, and the stretch along the busy highway forced most runners, including myself, to focus our attention on oncoming traffic while breathing in nasty car fumes. Again, beautiful city, very well organized race, a good amount of spectators, awesome medal, but uninspiring course.
3.0

By: Dan D.

Posted: October 07, 2013

Marginal Course and not what I expected

Portland is a beautiful city, but you don't get to see that part of it in the marathon. The roads are rough, full of potholes and obstacles (we must have crossed 20 railroad tracks) and the only scenic part is the St. John's bridge. Why not show off Forest Park? Before the bridge you run through an industrial area with heavy traffic and lots of debris on the road. The last 2 miles zigzag through the worst parts of the west side and right before the finish you get to run through a homeless camp that smelled like a dirty urinal (why not feed them to get them to move?). The organization provided nice medals and shirts, but the finisher's area was horrible. They ran out of chocolate milk, had the wrong snacks, but made sure you got a rose and a tree. After running 26.2 miles you don't want to carry that stuff. For a town known for fitness, Nike, and Addidas, Bill Rodgers was the only 'celebrity' they could find? I expected more from Portland but got the 'Detroit' experience.
4.0

By: Melissa M.

Posted: October 06, 2013

Getting to be too expensive to run

This will probably be the last time I run the Portland Marathon. This event is now too expensive to run. The city seems to treat this race as a money grab. Not only are the race fees are high, but downtown hotel rates are also pricey on marathon weekend. I paid over $200 a night for a mediocre hotel room. Pros: 1. Good spectators 2. Good course support 3. No rain Cons: 1. Out & back part of the course is boring. The run to the bridge is unattractive. 2. Organizers don't allow transfers between races. My running partner suffered an injury a few weeks before the race, and the organizers did not allow a switch to the half marathon. 3. Undesirable swag. Most of it will end up in the garbage. I don't like the look of the race shirts.
3.0

By: Alex M.

Posted: October 17, 2012

Good Marathon, but expected it to be greener

It is a nice Marathon, relatively flat, with only two significant hills at around Mile 3 and 17, and with a very good spectator support. I have to admit that reading about it being the greenest Marathon, I expected much more in that department. Running miles through a huge railroad depot and an industrial zone with no trees around doesn't sound 'green' to me. Still it was an enjoyable run, though I have to admit I expected a more scenic course.
4.0

By: Roger G.

Posted: October 15, 2012

A good starting marathon that needs a few tweaks

It was a great day to run the weather was beautiful, thanks Mother nature!They are really well organized and the Swag is above expectations. The start was actually a controlled wave, I was in corral B and we had to wait till A was gone, so many races their is a stampede of runners, that was kudos to PDX marathon. I felt the fans did a great job of support, people would yell me first name in encouragement. Mile 13-24 are a beautiful run even after the killer climb at mile 16, I had to stop to take in the scenery from the St John's bridge. The neighborhoods following were scenic and very supportive. The finish line was well supplied, loved the chocolate milk. There were only small things that needed addressing. My GPS would not work in the buildings at the start, I also lost my connection several times during the race. They don't have any clocks or time callers at any of the mile markers which would be helpful to those without GPS or stopwatch access. Like everybody else the first 9 miles are boring and we were stopped by an Amtrack train around mile 4. I was not sure what the entertainment value of pirates yelling arrr! but it did give me a laugh. Finally, when the race was done, I had to walk 4 blocks to pick-up my personal items, that could be moved closer to the finish line. Overall, if I was in the area, I would do this race again and encourage others to try it.
4.0

By: Sadie E.

Posted: October 15, 2012

The Pirate entertainment was THE BEST

OK, I am a sucker for anything piratical, and around mile 8 was ready for some different entertainment...then along came the Pirates singing a happy song about 'grog.' Their costumes were great and their singing was, too. I was so glad to see them on the return from the out-and-back; sorely tempted to slow down and listen a little longer, but there was a race to run... Weather was fantastic this year, wave start was smooth, course was just as boring as ever from mile 6-17. I thought it was strange that there wasn't an aid station after we crossed the St. Johns bridge until much later. It wasn't at all where it usually is, and I was gasping by the time it finally appeared. Bring the pirates back next year and I'll be there!
4.0

By: Leonard W.

Posted: October 12, 2012

Loved this race

Boy, I read some of these comments and I think 'What a bunch of whiners.' I came to this race expecting to have a miserable time. I had not had time to train nearly as much as I should have, and in my training runs I was hitting the wall around mile 17. They don't allow you to switch to the half, so I decided to just see how far I got in the full. This is one of the few marathons I have run where I didn't go out too fast. I deliberately kept a slow pace and took walk breaks at least every mile. The first 5 miles is pretty scenic, but after that the course is not very pretty. A local told me the course was laid out to have a long flat stretch in the middle. This means it goes through the warehouse district. The many bands here distract you from the mundane industrial landscape. Really, though, I have never run a marathon where I paid much attention to the scenery after the first 10 miles. If you're fretting about the scenery in a marathon, I'd say you're missing the whole point of running the race. A marathon is all about you, what is going on with your physical body and your mental state. Of secondary importance are your fellow runners, and third, the spectators. When I got to the long uphill at mile 16.5 I walked, as did most of the runners around me, with the notable exception of the 5 hour pace group, which breezed past us up the hill. I reached the dreaded mile 17 on the bridge and the dreaded wall was nowhere in sight. About then another runner struck up a long conversation with me. About two miles later I was a little shocked to realize that not only was I maintaining my slow but steady pace, but my mental state was upbeat and positive. This was my 23rd marathon, and I can't remember any others where I was actually still enjoying myself going into mile 20. The spectators in this stretch of the race were absolutely great, mostly people standing in front of their houses, calling out to runners by the names on their bibs and offering encouragement. The aid station workers were also very supportive. Around mile 23 I had another long chat with a fellow runner, this time a man with white hair and over 200 marathons under his belt. What an inspiration and a welcome distraction. I finished the race without ever hitting the wall or feeling discouraged. Yes, I finished among the last 25% or so of runners, but so what? It was only by letting go of my silly time goals that I was able to really enjoy this race.
5.0

By: Mel J.

Posted: October 11, 2012

Decent race

First off, this year had beautiful weather and I had a huge PR which is probably swaying my opinion. Their corral system and start went smoothly. My only issue were the porta potties in each corral. I was in the E corral and there didn't seem to be any defined lines. A lot of time was spent trying to figure out if you were in a line and if it was moving. The course was decent. The out and back through the industrial area from miles 6-11 plus miles 13-16 leading up to the bridge were pretty boring. Thank goodness they bill themselves as mp3 player friendly because I turned on my music during these miles. Other than that it was pretty scenic. The view from the St. John's bridge was gorgeous. The spectators and volunteers are awesome. Plenty of water and ultima. There wasn't any gel although they let you know that ahead of time on the website. There were a couple of areas where spectators weren't encouraged to be because of traffic logistics which unfortunately were the boring areas of the course. The last mile seemed to take forever not necessarily because I had just run 25 miles but because this was the third time I was running along Naito Pkwy. There was a ton of stuff at the finish, food, swag. Overall, I'm glad I ran this race. Not sure if I'll run it again only because there's so many other ones out there.
4.0

By: Michael M.

Posted: October 09, 2012

Great time...just needs a few tweaks

This was my 3rd marathon and first Portland marathon. Overall it was great. The fans were awesome and supportive but there are some long stretches without fans. I was a little surprised with all of the HILLS. I was expecting a flat marathon from all the comments but there were some legit hills in there that seemed to go on for miles. I didn't really like the finisher shirts but the rest of the gear that was sold at the expo was cool and affordable. Water stations were frequent but I didn't like the taste of the 'ultima' instead of gatorade and some GU stations would have been nice. Overall though, I had a blast and it was a great excuse to visit a very cool city. How about some beers at the finish next year?...isn't Portland famous for breweries?
4.0

By: Brent C.

Posted: October 09, 2012

So so course, good spectators, decent organziation

Organization: - Pretty smooth wave start. I was in the fifth corral, so it was a middle-of-the-pack group. They were letting corrals off every two minutes, and I had no problems with the pack at the start, even along the narrow streets of downtown Portland. -Volunteers are great and aid stations are good. Volunteers carry signs marking Ultima and water at the stations... Ultima always comes first. -HOWEVER, aid stations are placed in strange places at times. For example,no aid between mile 15.5 and mile 18.5. This is the section with the dreaded St. John's Bridge ascent, and I was shocked that there was no station waiting on the other side of the bridge. I really needed a drink after the bridge, so make sure you steel yourself until you get to the Mile 18 marker (or bring your own bottle). There are parts of the course where there are stations less than a mile apart from one another, so it's very strange. -Half marathoners share the course with marathoners for the first 11 miles, with separate turnarounds at mile 9. I was concerned that this would create a jumble of runners, but it actually worked out quite well. I think they limited the field of half-marathoners to about 3,000, so it wasn't an overwhelming amount of people. -They offered Vaseline at many of the aid stations. I didn't need any, but if you're chafing, it's good to know there's relief along the course. - I get it, Portland is a weird city. But for the love of all that is good and holy, please hand out Gu. Not a pill cup with three gummy bears. Not a handful of pretzels. Just swallow your independent city pride and hand out something manufactured by a large corporation so we don't have to bring our own. Gummy bears might be a cute idea, but we're running a marathon, not trick or treating. Gu... PowerShot... CliffBloks... something that we can go out and train with and get used to. -Finish chute is long, which is good because it forces you to keep moving along. Lots of food, but no signs as to what is where, so go investigate each table so you don't miss out on the chocolate milk or OJ or candy or bagels. The roses and seedlings are a nice touch, but frankly I'm not really looking to hang on to a bunch of swag as I stumble forward for 10 minutes to get out of the chute. Granted, you don't HAVE to take what they're handing you, but your brain is kind of scrambled, and you're just grabbing whatever is pressed into your hand at that point. I stopped taking what they were handing out after a certain point and had to go back and find the coin and pendant. Course: Frankly, I wasn't thrilled with the course, overall. Running along Natio for 8-ish miles is just zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Equally so along St. Helen's Road. There's also a point where it's possible to get stopped by an Amtrak train, which the organizers are indignant about (in other words: we don't care, deal with it). I didn't get stopped, and it probably doesn't happen to a TON of people, but it's inevitable that some will get stopped. I say if you're trying for a BQ, pick a different race because why put in months and months of effort if there's even the slightest chance that you could get stopped by a train? Just stupid. But the organizers really do not care about this. They indicate as much in the official race program they hand out at the expo. They've been doing it for 41 years, and that's just the way it is. -Miles 1-6: This is the point with the most spectators and where you are running in the largest pack. You'll probably also be too focused on sticking to plan that there won't be much to notice on the course. -Miles 6-11: A boring out-and-back along Front/Naito. Industrial with warehouses and limited spectators. Mental fatigue probably won't set in by this point, but it's probably the second worst part of the course. Mile 12: Through NW along Raleigh past 23rd ave... breaks up the monotony of running along Naito. Good spectator support. Mile 13-16: Ugh... four miles of boring nothingness as you run toward the St. Johns Bridge (which never seems to get any closer). No spectators, limited entertainment, cars whizzing by you to the right, by far the least enjoyable part of the course. And the whole time, you're probably dreading the climb coming at mile 17. -Mile 17: Be aware that this is the Bermuda Triangle for GPS watches. There's a cliff along the south side of the road for nearly the entire mile that blocked the signal to my watch and I lost time and pace until I reached the bridge Make sure to bring an extra (non-GPS) watch just to keep time, and be prepared for your Garmin or Nike Watch to drop signal until you reach the St. Johns Bridge, where you can restart it. -Mile 18-22: Tracking through some neighborhoods where you get some solid spectator support along the way. Lots of people standing in their yards cheering you on. This is where you'll also find some 'unofficial' aid stations (one had beer... I passed on that offering). Even though the elevation officially drops from the apex at the bridge, there are some rolling sections here that might nail you (especially in miles 21 and 22). -Mile 23: The goods news: a mile-long downhill along Greely/Interstate. The bad news: its industrial and boring. You might be too tired to notice, though. -Mile 24: The Broadway Bridge climb isn't long or particularly high, but it couldn't come at a worse time. -Mile 25-26.2: Back along Naito, spectators will probably carry you to the end. Spectators: -Great support. Spectators are really into it. Tip: You get to put something on your bib, so I suggest actually putting your name on it (as opposed to something 'funny' or 'inspirational') because the spectators will call out your name and give you encouragement all along the course.
4.0

By: John Wyant

Posted: October 09, 2012

LOVED IT !!!!!

Don't Miss It !!!
5.0

By: Bruce S.

Posted: October 08, 2012

One of the most boring marathons

I have now completed 126 marathons. This ranks as one of the most boring. A few hills...even rolling...would be nice, but this flat for Portland? The music is not a pleasant distraction. I felt sorry for a few places for the musicians because it was so loud. What about listening to the silence? Yet the organization was good and the weather great
3.0

By: Adam F.

Posted: October 08, 2012

Great first time marathon. Amazing volunteers.

This was my first marathon and a great experience. Great volunteers and fans. Well stocked aid stations all the way through. Fairly easy course (one hard hill at mile 17, but pretty flat overall). Lots of food at the end (even for the slower finishers like me). Well organized start. Only negative is that the course is not the most beautiful, but I didn't mind that much. Thanks to everyone who helps make this race happen.
4.0

By: Morgan S.

Posted: October 07, 2012

Half marathon

This review is for the half marathon. The only other half that I can compare it to is Rock & Roll Portland, which I ran earlier in the year and liked better. The Portland Half Marathon was a good experience. It was a great day for a run. Really beautiful weather. Volunteer support was good. The spectators were very encouraging. This race lacked the excitement of the Rock & Roll event. In my opinion, this course is inferior to the Rock & Roll course, which started and finished on the waterfront. Also this course does not take you into any neighborhoods. Instead, the last few miles are a long out and back between downtown and a warehouse area. The expo should move to the Oregon Convention Center. It has outgrown its current location. This half marathon is expensive. More expensive than a Rock & Roll race. Overall I would choose Rock & Roll Portland over this half marathon.
4.0

By: Michael Thompson

Posted: January 21, 2012

Freakin Incredible

Where to start? Hills, misty rain, cold...it was still awesome. More goodies at this race than any other race. A volunteer asked me at the finish if I wanted a ham sandwich. Hell yes I said. I've done some mid-sizes races, and this was incredible. Medals were great, shirts (yes, that's plural) were great, and they even gave me a tree seedling to plant when I got home. Weird, but still cool. It was the 40th running of the event, so not sure it's like that all the time, but man, I'd probably come back, just because it was so good. Was even better than the Twin Cities Marathon in MN, which I thought was the tops for a race of the same size.
5.0

By: David H.

Posted: December 09, 2011

Nice, but not great

This was my 10th Portland Marathon. It hasn't changed much over the past 25 years from my first time here. Same pluses and minuses. Pro: 1. Well organized, with only a couple minor exceptions. On the positive, for example, energy drink was always first at the aid stations, followed by the water. Expo well organized. etc. 2. Volunteers helpful and enthusiastic. 3. All miles clearly marked. 4. Loads and loads of food goodies at finish. Especially liked the popcicles and the cold oj, but there was certainly something for everyone to like. 5. Wave start was good Cons: 1. Ugly course. More than half is boring 'concrete jungle' of industrial areas. They do this to minimize traffic impact, but it definitely does not show off the beauty of the city. 2. Ugly finisher shirts. Normally the shirts are nice and distinctive. This year was the 40th anniversary, and they messed up a good thing by doing lots of poor looking roses on the shirt. Organizers: PLEASE go back to the design that has been so good in the past. Note: even the participant shirts were ugly, although not as bad as the finisher shirts. 3. no boxes or bags at the finish to carry all the nice goodies. Need something to use to carry all the 'stuff' (food, beverage, finisher medal, finisher pin, finisher pendant, finisher shirt, tree seedling, etc.). 4. Event merchandise overpriced. Very expensive compared to what other marathons charge. 5. Communications in the months before the race. Unless you were connected on Facebook, you might have missed helpful information. 6. Clothing retrieval at the finish was VERY difficult to locate. Also it was not stated anywhere in the race info whether the clothing drop off required participants to bring their own bags or if bags would be provided. 7. Spectators. Some have referred to the spectators as a positive, but my assessment is that the number of them is small compared to other events of this size, and their support level was 'fair' on the scale of 'poor' to 'great'. I will say that those who came out to watch/cheer had a disproportionate number of cowbells. Liked that part. Also of note: there are a number of other events that occur at the same time, such as 1/2 M, 5 mile run, marathon walk, etc. Parking is difficult to find, and the entire area can be quite congested. Finally the music: the event touts the many musical groups that are performing. This is definitely a plus. BUT, in the latter part of the race some of the groups began packing up and leaving after the 3:30 pace group went by, leaving numerous music stations vacated for the last half of the participants and probably most all of the marathon walkers. It was disappointing, but could easily be fixed in the future. Overall, a nice event, but not a top tier event. I'd recommend it for a first-timer, but not one you'd likely do again and again unless you lived nearby.
3.0

By: Leah R.

Posted: November 12, 2011

Great organization, awesome fans

This was my first marathon and I absolutely loved it. Never had to wait in line for water, gummy bears, or port-a-potties. Race started right on time. The people at the expo were incredibly encouraging and gave me some really helpful specifics about the course. Fans were all over the course and yelled my name out loud, I felt like a rock star. There were a few boring stretches but they made running over the bridges that much more awesome. Great race, can't wait to do it again next year!
5.0

By: Alison D.

Posted: November 08, 2011

Good experience

I had a great time at the Portland marathon. Yes, there were some long stretches of the course that were 'ugly' but I have yet to run a race that didn't have some down time in the course. 26.2 miles is a long way so I don't expect every mile to be beautiful and fun and exciting. The weather was drizzly and gray but I expected that from Portland! This race had some of the best spectators I have ever experienced. I am a slower runner and people were still cheering like crazy. The finish line was great; the energy was amazing and they had a ton of food options. I also loved the gummi bears on the course! The hills were more than I had expected but I still got through it and overall really enjoyed this experience. Very organized from start to finish.
5.0

By: Tom S.

Posted: October 23, 2011

First half of the course needs some work

Pros: 1. Fans were awesome. I was really happy to see all the people that came out to cheer after crossing the river. 2. The accomodations at the end were great. So much food (and thankfully, because I was starving, see below). 3. Participant and finishers shirts were great. Cons 1. An f'n TRAIN went across the course and required us to stop during the race. 2. The 3:35 pace group was all over the place in terms of timing (still ended at the correct time though) 3. Not a single Guu station. Even though the website said there would be. I was running on complete empty. If it weren't for the fans setting up their own fruit stations after the first bridge, I don't know how I would have finished. Instead, they handed out little dixie cups w/ 4 or 5 gummy bears in them. 4. As someone already said, if you like looking at warehouses, you'll LOVE this course. 5. The expo was cramped extremely hot. 6. Much more expensive than it should be. If I had to pick a place to run my first marathon again, it wouldn't be Portland. Should have run Chicago, as it was the same weekend.
4.0

By: Burton O.

Posted: October 14, 2011

Well organized, fantastic event.

This was my 12th Portland Marathon and it was the best one yet. The race has grown considerably since my first in 1997 and not always for the better. However, this year's race was extremely well organized from start to finish. The wave start was done very smoothly with volunteers checking bibs. There were still some walkers that made it through, but it significantly reduced the weaving in and out during the first few miles. There were lots of music and cheering spectators along the route. They've also increased the amount of porta-potties on the course over previous years, so that really helps. Aid stations were well stocked. Plenty of great volunteers for everything too. Runners were given a goodie bag with a technical short sleeve shirt at the expo (nice surprise), along with a long sleeve finisher's shirt at the end. Finishers were also given a nice gold medal, commemorative coin and small pendant... almost too much! =) As for the course, yes, the sections along the warehouse district and St. Helens Road are not scenic, but overall, it's still a great course. Weather for this year's race was drizzly and cool. Temps were in the high 50s most of the race and the humidity hovered around 95%. Overall, not ideal conditions, but still fairly good. One thing I would recommend is to 'friend' Portland Marathon on Facebook. This really helped with announcements and news items before the race. For instance, one of their posts alerted me to the fact that spectators could track runners via live updates from the marathon homepage. This came in very handy for my family!
5.0

By: Martin Getzinger

Posted: October 13, 2011

Smart Run / Fun Run

This was my 3rd Portland Marathon. This year I was mindful of the grade of the streets an stayed in the center where the street was flatter. I also walked the hill leading to th St Johns Bridge. This resulted in me not hitting the wall at the Bridge and I was able to make the run without blowing out my knees. I stuck to my plan throughout the course and the payoff was that I had FUN. My time wasn't great, but it was my best time so far. I could have shaved off some minutes but I wouldn't have enjoyed the Marathon like I did. I am totally pleased with my run :)
4.0

By: Dave Nicely

Posted: October 12, 2011

Mixed Feelings

The positives: 1) Well organized pre/post race. 2) Packet pickup smooth. 3) Awesome final .2 to the finishing line. 4) Finisher area easy to get food, drink. 5) Gear bag pickup quick and easy The negatives: 1) Expo cramped, and why must people bring their strollers? 2) Course was dull, tight in places and had two out-and-back portions. 3) If you're a serious warehouse person, you'll be in heaven on this course. 4) No boxes for food line. There was a lot of stuff available and given to you, but no way to easily carry it. 5) No call outs at mileage signs so I missed a number of them. 6) Don't recall GUI being handed out at any aid station. Probably missed it, but it wasn't like other races where the volunteers are shouting out what they have. I drove 600+ miles for the event, and for the travel time and cost I would not run this course again.
4.0

By: Doug K.

Posted: October 12, 2011

Portland Marathon 2011

This was my first Portland Marathon. Pros: Volunteers were great. Spectators were very supportive & vocal (it was a nice touch to have 1st names on the bibs so people could cheer you on) Food & snacks at the end were great Nice give-sways Cons: As mentioned the course making the loop, not only out but back through the warehouse area, not my 1st choice Ultima refresher- this was frustrating, I starting using this when I read that it would be offered at the Marathon. The grape & orange actually taste good. The orange was listed as the flavor to be used on the website for the marathon. The stations had what I believe was a bad mixed version of the lemonade flavor- just a reminder to carry your own liquid if you want something besides water.
4.0

By: Jay D.

Posted: October 11, 2011

Well organized Race/Uninspiring Course

Very well organized marathon, but oh my gosh what a boring course!! There were huge sections where there were no spectators and nothing to look at but ugly industrial buildings. Surely the organizers can showcase their city better than this! I stayed at the host hotel (Hilton) downtown. Nice hotel and excellent service. I found it really concerning though, the number of homeless people in the city. I know this has nothing to do with the marathon, but gosh, strange atmosphere stepping around sleeping homeless people getting to the start line in the morning. Some of the underpasses had a distinct smell of urine as well as people curled up under blankets. I made a choice to carry my own fluids in the race, because of Ultima being served on the course. Ultima is not the best choice for adequate carb and electrolyte replacement. The commemorative tee and the finishers shirts were very nice, but the unisex sizing made them way too big for women. I got a small (there were no x-small) and they are like tents on me! Portland puts on a great marathon...they just need to spruce up the details..
3.0

By: Carlos S.

Posted: October 11, 2011

mixed feelings

Pros: 1. good organization 2. nice short sleeve technical shirt with goodie bag and very nice long sleeve technical finisher's shirt Cons: 1. medal - disappointed, for a 40th anniversary I was expecting something bigger or with a more detailed design. 2. flowers at the finish line. Instead of flowers they should have given a finisher's hat 3. expensive 4. Boring course through industrial areas and only a couple of nice bridges.
3.0

By: Steve S.

Posted: October 10, 2011

Ugly course, but well run

Starting with the positives - The volunteers were awesome, cool stuff afterwards like medal, coin, necklace, rose, finisher shirt, and a tree. That was pretty cool. It was so much stuff it was hard to carry and pick up food. Negatives - If you love warehouses, this is the marathon for you. If not, egad this is an ugly marathon. I think it was about 15 miles of warehouses. Portland has pretty area. Why can't the organizers find it? I have run 8 marathons and this is by far the ugliest course. I hope I never see an uglier course.
3.0

By: Lon C.

Posted: October 10, 2011

Good but too expensive.

The Portland Marathon is almost like a Rock 'n' Roll Marathon, if you're into that sort of thing. Plenty of entertainment along the course. Pros: 1. Course support and spectators were great. However, the energy drink and gels were products I never used before, or even heard of. 2. The course. I heard a lot of criticism about the marathon course. I agree there could have been more scenery, but it wasn't too bad. I would not call it a fast course although I ran a decent time. 3. Fairly good running weather. The weather started out dry. Then there were rain showers a couple of hours into the race. The temperatures were comfortable. Cons: 1. I don't like the way this race handles the start. Runners are assigned to separate corrals that are brought up to the start line for a wave start. They need better signage or more people directing runners to their corrals. It was difficult to find my way to the corral in the dark. 2. Not enough porta-potties at the start area. 3. The expo has outgrown the current venue. The organizers should seriously consider holding the expo at a larger venue that can accommodate it all on one floor. 4. Protesters near the finish area. There was a protest in downtown Portland over the weekend that extended to race day. We actually ran by the encampment at the start. The protest was held too close to the start/finish areas which made leaving the finish area congested. I heard demonstrators were permitted on the marathon course late in the race while there were still walkers using the course. I liked the Portland Marathon. The city was nice, but it's not a race I'll return to. It wasn't worth the high entry fee.
4.0

By: Daniel Lenski

Posted: October 10, 2011

Tough course, big race, great spectators, good swa

This was my 4th marathon, 1st Portland, and I set my PR at 2:43. I was up front in the A corral and the start was fine for me, but it looked like a total crowded mess shortly behind. Joining back up with slow half-marathoners around mile 24 was a bit frustrating. The course was challenging, but mostly scenic, and I greatly enjoyed it. I expected the St John's bridge to be the toughest part, but the rolling hills and long gradual uphill portions right after it (miles 17-22) were by far the hardest part. Spectators and volunteers were supportive and numerous, braving the typical Portland drizzly weather. The T-shirts (one for signing up, one for finishing) are very nice, as are the posters... the medals/coins/pendants are silly in my opinion. I wish the race were not so expensive, and that they had publicized the fact that the Ultima sports drink contains no sugar, only electrolytes. I also think they need more port-a-potties near the start.
5.0

By: Pankaj M.

Posted: October 10, 2011

Fantastic Marathon

I ran this in 2011. Excellent organization, spectators and overall amazing..
5.0

By: Brent B.

Posted: October 10, 2011

Great Marathon!.....'The People's Marathon'

Just ran the 2011 40th Annual Portland Marathon. Absolutely had a great time. I've read the negative reviews on this website and although I can see some of the negative comments, my experience was incredible. This is the third Marathon I've done after Santa Barbara and Marine Corps. From the Expo to the start and finally finish line, organization of the event was outstanding. I can't believe how many volunteers they have for this race! Here is my review; Expo: felt like any other expo but organized and no issues with getting bib/t-shirt/packets. Had great stores. Start: Well organized and started in waves. Didn't seem crazy like the Marine Corps. Had that 'low-key' feeling. Course: Course is overall flat and fast, ( ran my PR in this) . Crowd support was great and amazed at all of the bands they had peforming! I do a agree from other comments that crowd support thinned out in the some areas but cmon this isn't like running in downtown New York. Also plenty of water/fuel stations and portapotties. Finish: well organized with plenty of food/drink and reunion area. Also they give you a medal/coin/pennant and 2 shirts! .....along with a rose and tree seeding. Very cool. So overall had an absolute blast with the course/family. Weather was misty/showery but cleared most of the way. Would highly recommend this event!
5.0

By: Scott C.

Posted: October 09, 2011

GREAT CROWDS !

This was my 11th marathon for this year. I've had many good ones, but Portland (my hometown), keeps making this better every year. This year they actually figured out how to do the wave start correctly. That's important with 12,000 full marathoners plus a bunch of 1/2's. They also improved tremendously on the medal, which has been my biggest beef with them. Great job!!! But one thing that didn't change, the best crowd support for a marathon of this size (sure, NYC is better, but it's a huge city) Even with our famous Oregon rain, the crowds were out in full force ... so were the bands, cheer sections, etc. Something going on nearly the entire route. Well done Portland !!!
5.0

By: liza f.

Posted: January 26, 2011

It's getting too crowded

I felt the most disappointing factor about this year's race was the hyped-up wave start. I expected great improvement over previous years. NOT! I was surprised to find myself in the last runners' wave, in front of only the walkers, which didn't reflect my anticipated finish time. The corrals were not monitored and people milled around wherever they wanted. It took over 19 minutes to get to the starting line! (Even in Boston, which has more than twice as many participants, it took less time than that, and their corrals were very professionally monitored.) The start has always been tight for about the first mile, but this year I literally was unable to run for the first 3 miles, blocked in by too many bodies and too many walkers. The streets are narrow in places and couldn't handle the volume. I think that adding the half-marathoners to the same course at the same time has pushed this event over the tipping point. Start the half-marathoners at a different time and cap the marathon registrations to a more reasonable number and let us have a chance to start well. It is just too crowded.
4.0

By: Thomas B.

Posted: November 01, 2010

Good marathon but needs some improvements

This is the third time I've run Portland, and it was by far the worst with respect to weather. Surprisingly, once I started running, the rain didn't bother me except for the sheets of water on the roads. I think the rain really kept the music and bands away this year because there seemed to be far fewer than in years past. Crowd support was good for the most part but thinned out after the St. John's Bridge . Pros 1. Fairly well organized. 2. Great finish area with lots of food options. Cons 1. Ultima fluid on the course, The stuff is nasty and is only electrolytes, no calories. 2. Most of the cups were plastic, which didn't allow for the usual squeezing necessary for drinking on the run. 3. Hyped up the date of the run as 10-10-10, but that was not to be found on the t-shirts or medals. I was disappointed. 4. Expensive. 5. This year they required packet pick up the day before the race. No day-of-race pickup, which is extremely inconvenient for those who don't live in Portland or aren't staying in a Portland hotel.
4.0

By: Kat W.

Posted: October 30, 2010

Rainy and bleak - but great fans

I came expecting a flat and fast course - which is what I got. I also got a downpouring of rain, outpouring of support, and uproariously few porta-potties in my wave start. "A" wave needed far more porta-potties. I loved the bands and support (not to mention the flat course), and did not see a single train. I probably won't run this race again - too crowded, too boring, and too focused on the gimmicks and the stories rather than the actual running.
4.0

By: Patricia L.

Posted: October 20, 2010

My thoughts on Portland Marathon

I will try to be fair in my comments. Pros: 1. Great volunteer support from start to finish. Thank you! 2. More thanks to the spectators who came out on a rainy day. 3. Good race day organization. Plenty of water stations and porta-potties. 4. Plentiful entertainment along the course. Cons: 1. Nobody can control the weather, but it rained practically the entire morning of the race. One of the wettest races I have run in a long time. 2. This is an expensive race: $135 for the marathon. $125 for the half marathon. 3. The course. There have been enough comments about the industrial parts of the course; but, with the addition of a half marathon, I believe the course is near capacity. It was crowded out there. 4. The quality of the race shirts was not as good as in previous years. Last year's shirts were technical shirts by Nike. 5. Ultima drink and Tiger gel were hard to stomach.
4.0

By: Ryan M.

Posted: October 18, 2010

What an amazing experience!

This was my first-ever marathon, so I have nothing with which to compare, but I did enjoy it. The rain was miserable (followed by days of sunshine, of course); the course had more hills than I expected; the volunteers were great; the fans definitely deserve a huge "thank you" just for showing up in such crappy conditions and being so positive; the Ultima electrolyte replacement tasted horrible; and the entry and finisher shirts were nice but seemed to run a little shorter than other running shirts I've purchased that were the same size. I will return next year to improve on my time.
5.0

By: Alex W.

Posted: October 18, 2010

Great spectators, but needs MORE start porta-potti

Given the rain, there was a ton of support. The Ultima was disgusting, and because the cups they handed it out in were (I think) eco-plastic, you couldn't squeeze the top to drink, so it spilled all over me. Thankfully, it wasn't colored like Gatorade. There were seriously 300 to 500 too few porta potties at the start, especially by the A and B waves. How could they not consider that? It's unforgivable. I saw many miss the start waiting. Great atmosphere if you don't ever need to use the bathroom and don't drink or eat their handouts.
4.0

By: Charlie P.

Posted: October 17, 2010

So Much Potential, But....

This race had some high points, but was overall a big disappointment. The pros: 1. Fans and bands were quite enthusiastic despite the POURING rain. 2. Support stations were well run and had plenty of great volunteers. 3. Miles 18-24 were quite scenic and had a lot of excited spectators. 4. Lots of good photos. 5. The variety of food at the finish line. 6. PORTLAND is fun and easy to get around on the public transit system. Now for the cons: 1.The start line felt chaotic and was very dark. 2. The clothing drop-off at the start was jam packed, they ran out of bags, and the staff was incredibly rude. They had known it would be raining for days, yet seemed very unprepared. An unsettling way to start the race. More about the clothing drop later. 3. Miles 5-11 of the route was an out and back through a boring and frankly ugly industrial area. Miles 12-17 was a uphill climb on a major highway with no fans allowed. 4. The course was .2-.3 miles too long. This was verified by several Garmins. 5. Ultima and gel tasted pretty bad. 6. "Checkpoint Charlie" felt like airport security on the steepest part of the course! Having officials dart through runners looking for bandits was so distracting! No one likes bandits, but to distract runners in the middle of a marathon on a tough climb was ridiculous. 7. Finish line was chaotic felt disorganized. We waited an hour, freezing cold and wet, in order to retrieve our clothing bags. What a mess!
3.0

By: Deirdre B.

Posted: October 16, 2010

Really good race but Ultima is so nasty!

Although it rained pretty much the whole time, I had a lot of fun running in Portland. Some of it was very scenic, and the industrial areas were hideously fascinating in their own way. The spectators and volunteers were so enthusiastic even though they stood in the rain for hours. I loved the shirts and the trinkets and food at the end of the race. The aid stations were plentiful and the gummy bears were a fun way to take in carbs. But: Ultima is the most vile drink ever! The gel they gave out on the course was bad! For the high entry price, those were real disappointments.
5.0

By: Cormac B.

Posted: October 15, 2010

Overpriced and not for seasoned runners...

This was my 11th time running Portland, and while I like the event due to location (home town), I've become increasingly disappointed by the fees ($135), that they've brought in a 1/2, that they focus so much on MP3 friendliness, and that their on course drink is awful (Ultima). The organization is good, and course is OK, but I sure would like to see them focus more on runners and less on the gadgetry and accessories around marathons.
4.0

By: Patrick R.

Posted: October 12, 2010

Great Marathon

This was my second time running Portland and I appreciated it much more this time after having run a different marathon a couple of times in between. The course has distinct sections to it and is somewhat rolling as opposed to a flat out-and-back. Mentally, I liked the breaks and physically my legs like the changes. It's fairly easy to get to the start. The crowds and music are great. The aid stations are numerous enough to accommodate any fueling plan. The medical tent and staff are very helpful if you're in need after the race. I'd prefer if the half were a separate race. Winding your way around slower half runners and walkers at the end is too much. I still can't believe how many walkers I saw in the middle of the course 2-3 abreast strolling along as if a race weren't occuring. I'd give the course and organization 5 stars if you didn't have to navigate around walkers and slower half runners. Overall, though, great race and great weather!
4.0

By: Michael M.

Posted: October 11, 2010

Rainy with underground expo

It poured down hard during most of this marathon, which reduced the crowd support considerably along this largely industrial area course. Yet some faithful bands, cheerleaders, and other well wishers came out. The expo was in a parking garage and was very tight and uncomfortable. It was somewhat hard to find the starting places in the dark, rainy weather at 6 AM. There were numerous puddles along the course, making for wet shoes and socks, slower times, and being too cold at the end. The volunteers were fantastic with water and Ultima. Jeff Galloway, as usual, did great seminars about training and running strategies. The finish line had great refreshments. Overall, I probably will not return because this was the second year (including 2008) that I had to run in the rain, and these were by far the worst weather conditions I've had in my running career.
3.0

By: Scott Allen

Posted: October 10, 2010

Best spectator support outside NYC

Okay, the route is an issue. Too much industrial stuff for a beautiful city. But besides that, it's a nice route, and besides the bridge at mile 16, it was pretty level. It rained to beat the band this year... and I know rain because I'm from Portland. But an amazing thing happened; I think it brought out MORE spectators... and they were over-the-top supportive. This was my 5th marathon this year and by far the best supported, with the best crowds and best bands... and I did a Rock 'n' Roll Marathon!
4.0

By: David C.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Loses a lot by running through industrial district

My fifth marathon. Plenty of water stops; crowds were great. I can't believe we ran up Route 30 on the shoulder. There were semi trucks driving by in the next lane. A tragedy waiting to happen. I commend the organizers for wanting us to run over the St. John's Bridge, as it is fantastic, but the industrial parks are not scenic and another running lane is needed on Route 30. After the bridge, the route was great. Thank you to everybody for coming out to cheer us on!!
4.0

By: Bill W.

Posted: March 06, 2010

Over-rated marathon. Sub-par course.

So many people have touted this marathon that I flew to Portland with high expectations. I left disappointed. First the positives. The weather was great and Portland is a nice city. The spectators and musicians were nice. As for the negatives, I can only echo the complaints already stated. The wave start was not managed well. The course isn't all that scenic.
3.0

By: Evan B.

Posted: December 10, 2009

Great run, nice city, chow could have been better

It was really great overall. The red lizards pace group was a huge help. I was shooting for Boston (3:10), which I failed to make, but I did set a PR. Fan support was the best I have seen. Just a little disappointed in the food line at the end. It was a cold race, and there was no warm stuff at the end. Had a great time, though.
4.0

By: mark s.

Posted: December 09, 2009

The Ultimate Train-Spotting Marathon?

Or should I say, "Trainstopping?" Let me explain.... After four months of a difficult training regimen, I felt cautiously confident that I could run a Boston qualifier. The race started out well, the rain had just stopped, and I was in a comfortable pace, everything going according to my plan. All of a sudden, at mile six, I see the train barrier go down and a very slow train start to go by. For three, long, agonizing minutes, we stood there waiting for this train to pass! It took awhile to get back into a rhythm, and because of the time lost and my qualifying cushion now gone, I had to change my Boston qualifying plan drastically. In the end, I qualified by a mere 14 seconds, and I couldn't have possibly run even a second faster! I was thrilled, of course, and celebrated late into the night, and put the train episode behind me, sort of. I live in Portland, and one of the main reasons that I chose to be here was the overall attractiveness of the city (the main reason are the people here, as they rock - but I digress). Why the race organizers decided to run it through mostly crappy, industrial areas is a mystery to many of us. Anyway, if you still want to run this race, I would recommend bringing a train schedule and wrapping your Boston qualifying plan around it.
3.0

By: rural girl

Posted: December 07, 2009

Well Organized and Nice Course

This was my first Portland Marathon, and I can see why folks return year after year. The organization was great; the recovery area had tons of food, an ice station, a photo area and more. The course was too crowded between miles 12 and 16. Maybe a wave start next year would help. The music along the course was fabulous; there was enough to make you think you were running an R'n'R event. And I like that the event is MP3-friendly. See you next year!
5.0

By: John N.

Posted: December 06, 2009

Decent race, bad fueling

I gave the course three stars because I'm not really fond of city running. It wasn't ugly, but it was not particularly scenic either. Fans were great, and it was easy to get where you needed to be. Complaints: The drink on the course was low-carb (ULTIMA). For a marathon? Carbs are critical. Gels were Honey Stingers in cups. I would have taken a packet to try during training but no way will I use it for the first time in a race. They also had gummy bears, so that partially makes up for this. Awards were given to the top 15 in each age group, which was cool. For my 11th place, I received a nice plaque that said rather generically, "age group award" - no mention of place, age group or time. I think fewer awards with a little personalization would be better. Overall, the race was decent. Probably not a repeater unless I have another reason to be in the area on race day.
4.0

By: Seth R.

Posted: November 23, 2009

Great race - mostly flat and fast

This was my 7th marathon and I thought Portland was a great race. Although there are a few hills, very large stretches of the race are very flat and perfect for a PR. This is not a "rolling hill" race, but rather pretty flat, and punctuated by a few hills. The race is very well organized, and I thought there was plenty of support along the course. The only thing that needs to change is the energy gel that comes in cups and tastes terrible. I've never seen it before and would rather one of the big-name gels, like Power or Clif. Portland itself is a nice city with free public transit and a great place for a long weekend.
4.0

By: Jill O.

Posted: October 31, 2009

nice weather in a scenic location

PROS: pretty area, good weather, fast course. CONS: that Liquid Gold stuff was disgusting and they didn't have water for another half-mile after they handed it out - I almost threw up. I don't like turnarounds when you see the people ahead/behind you so much; the city is big enough that you don't need to do that! There were not many people out to cheer people on, and meeting with friends was HARD at the end!! I liked running across the bridges, and the people in the race were nice. I didn't train much and got a PR, so that was pretty cool (the course was pretty fast and flat). They make you walk all the way around the block and then some before you can get out of the finishing area and meet up with your friends. Some random guy ran into me and knocked my cell phone out of my hand and across the street... (he was wearing jeans and a sweatshirt so I knew he had not just run). He apologized but I was still annoyed. Spectators should give runners (it was obvious I was a runner; I was wearing the space blanket and a finisher medal) some space, especially at the end when we're tired!!
4.0

By: Kirk F.

Posted: October 15, 2009

Could be a great race, but not quite.

I love the city of Portland, and I ran a PR here, so I want to say this race is terrific but... - Not enough porta-potties at the start - Start was crowded and a zoo. People pushed way up faster than they should have clogging the start. Austin is my standard for good behavior by runners; it can be done. - Trains interrupted the course twice that I know of. They cut the four-hour pace group in half, which would have made me cry if I wanted a four-hour finish to qualify for Boston! (I did not get caught myself.) This is really bad; I'm not surprised that the organizers do not mention this risk, as it is embarrassing for a mid-major race to have this problem, but I am shocked they don't figure out how to fix this as this race grows. -N ot much crowd support until after 19 or so. On the other hand... + Well organized water stops that were all the same: sports drink first, water second. It's funny how many races don't get that little thing right. + Fast course. + I love Portland, and there are lots of hotels to stay at within walking distance of the start and finish. + 15-deep age-group awards. + There were lots of photographers out there. + Good (not great) expo (surprised that Nike and/or Adidas are not a huge supporters of this race and don't show up big).
3.0

By: Joe E.

Posted: October 11, 2009

Really enjoyable race

This is my second Portland Marathon, my first being in 2006. I've done 10 marathons since and have a few to compare with. This is a well-run race. The course is really just a fine one. Like many, I liked the out-and-back portion; it's fun to see all of the other runners. The residential portion past St. John's Bridge was terrific - great fans. The organizers do a great job. I do have two suggestions. First, please add more porta-johns at the start. This seems obvious, but the lines were too long and I suspect forced some "alternate relief," which the downtown area probably didn't want. Second, I found the first five miles much more congested than I remembered three years ago. The route was a bit different... but it was a full five miles before I had room to run, having started with the 4:45 group. This could be alleviated with a more disciplined (i.e. roped off) wave start to create more space. Overall, though, an excellent race and one I'd clearly run again.
5.0

By: Timothy Herko

Posted: October 11, 2009

Good Marathon, Great City

This was my first Portland Marathon, and I was pleased. Overall, it is a good race, and a great city. If you are thinking about it, and maybe on the fence, go. The course is more challenging with more elevation changes than they make it out to be. The course could be fast if run tactically. It sure as heck is not flat. Not by a long shot. As far as whether it's scenic or not, I think it is good. Portland has some attractive sections not covered on the marathon route. Why? Very simple. Logistics. And by staying close to the Willamette River, they control the elevation a little better. It is a trade-off. Simple as that. Organization is overall good, especially considering the number of finishers. One heads-up: they give a one-off gel called Liquid Gold in these big paper cups (think like a large ketchup cup). There was a criticism on this site from a prior year alluding to an emphasis on profits over runners. There is some truth to this, especially if you assume that there was no gel in prior years. Some things you pay extra for in Portland, like a training shirt, come free in other races. Choose accordingly. A last plus is that there is a lot to see and do in the City of Portland. If you like to sight-see in the surrounding areas, you'll be in for a treat. The same holds true if by some chance you should happen to like microbrewed beer. I'd recommend this race at least once to anyone, regardless of experience.
4.0

By: Jennifer J.

Posted: October 10, 2009

Great city/great marathon

I really liked this race. It had good organization and a fine course. I loved the Taiko drummers. The scenery is not spectacular, but I never notice much scenery anyway when running a marathon. St. John's Bridge was beautiful. I had trouble with with 3:45 pacers going out way too fast and did NOT like what was served on the course for drinks/replenishment. Liquid Gold?? I recommend good, old-fashioned GU. Nice goodies at the end.
4.0

By: Talon W.

Posted: October 10, 2009

Absolutely awesome event!

This is the best large-event race I've participated in: Super organized (with a couple of small blips), course with some good variety of flat and hills, SUPER aid stations and volunteers, challenging finish (uphill and around a corner), excellent post-race food. Pros: PLENTY of porta-potties, great organization, fast-moving registration process, timing device attached to bib so it doesn't get misplaced easily, excellent post-race food choices, no worries about running out, sense of humor near the finish line, plenty of variety in the course, top-notch aid stations, plenty of places for spectators, lots of music all around the course, clothing drop next to the start line, SUPER volunteers who were helpful and enthusiastic, finish chute was nice and wide so you can pass people comfortably, technical T-shirt. Cons: Long lines for porta-potties (but what can you do when there are almost 10,000 people?), no gels or food on course (three gummy bears are NOT going to refuel you, and they had two stations with some nasty-looking goop no one had ever heard of instead of gels), confusing literature about parking (items handed out at expo stated that there would be free parking on Sundays; however, that wasn't true, as parking charges start at 1 p.m. and you couldn't prepay). I brought my own fuel source thankfully, but come on, committee! Put some gels on the course or make sure people get enough gummy bears to actually refuel them. I understand wanting to reduce waste. I completely support that. Like I said, you can still work the gummy bears, but racers need more than three.
5.0

By: Seth D.

Posted: October 09, 2009

Love Portland

Once more, as I go around the country, I post my comments about yet another marathon. Portland is a great city with a special vitality and excitement to it. It is a shame that the course did not show more of it. Due to the railroad tracks and the commercial/industrial areas the race goes through, I did not love the course. I also dinged the organizers not for anything that was lacking about the ancillary events but for two big errors. First, you must cap the race size because your start area is not large enough. Second, in a city so concerned with the environment, why did you use plastic cups? Paper is much better for the runners and the environment. On a minor side, it would not hurt to give out GU on the course; if much smaller races can do it, so too can you. Despite the flaws above, this race cannot help but be a success and fun to run. The city is just that nice and the people are that into the race. One other thing: do not start a half-marathon. You do not need it, the course is crowded already and it will take away from the full marathon. Races that have trouble getting runners hold a half-marathon. You do not need it and should not do it. I know the distance has become popular and I understand the reasons for holding the half, but when you have a successful full marathon, do not dilute it with a half. You can hold a half-marathon, but do it as a stand-alone event - not as part of the full marathon day. One final note to people who come from outside the Portland area. Arrive a day or two before the race and see Portland and the areas around it. It is worth your time.
4.0

By: Amy A.

Posted: October 09, 2009

I can't recommend it

Nice weather in 2009. Good quantity and choices of nutrition in the finish area. Those are about the only good things I can say about the Portland Marathon. I'm surprised that anyone would comment that this race is well organized. There were too many problems for me to recommend it. 1. Clothing drop-off was ridiculous. Runners had to stand in long lines to wait for volunteers to write each number on a bag and re-bag the clothes. Most races provide a bag beforehand so that you can just hand it over when you get there. 2. Not enough entry areas to the barricade fences at the start. In addition, the start area was far too crowded. 3. The "wave start" was not described in the pre-race literature and not well managed. 4. Too many turns too soon in the race for such a large crowd. 5. I didn't have to stop for trains, but several of my friends did. That's ridiculous. 6. Aid stations were not well spaced; some were too far apart, some too close together. Hard plastic cups couldn't be pinched for "grab and go."
3.0

By: Jim D.

Posted: October 08, 2009

better than expected

Based on the overly critical reviews on this site, I had low expectations for the Portland Marathon. Many of the posters on this site either have not run many marathons or are spoiled crybabies who expect way too much. If you actually want to run a marathon, you could do a lot worse. This really is quite a good race. The good: The race is a marathon only, with no half, no 10K, etc. The weather was perfect, although that was just luck of the draw. The course is perfect for a PR (although I didn't run one - you actually need to train for one). I liked the scenery and the dreaded "industrial" section. I've never been to Portland and you should do some sightseeing around town while you are there (it's an excellent city to visit, especially if you like beer), but I liked seeing the industrial area and train yards and seeing the runners ahead of and behind me. The view from the St. John's Bridge was among the more breathtaking marathon moments I've experienced in 36 marathons. After the bridge, the rest of the course was very friendly on tired legs. The finish was very memorable (almost everyone's name gets called out about 0.1 from the finish, giving spectators with cameras a heads up). Having your name on your BIB is also a nice feature that I can't believe more marathons don't have. I didn't have an MP3 player, but it is a nice option for those who did. I personally liked the variety of music on the course. The shirt is an excellent one (Nike Dri-Fit), and the medal is decent (though the ribbon is better than the actual medal). The expo was a good size - not as big as Boston or New York obviously, but better than most. An excellent feature after the race was the presence of kiddie pool ice baths - highly recommended for leg recovery. The not-so-good: the start was a little weird and confusing, although I did get there a little too close to race time. I probably didn't pay close attention to the nice race program either, or take advantage of the ample opportunties to get race info at the expo. There were probably not enough porta-potties, but as I guy with no shame, that really didn't concern me. There is a wave start, which is nice; but in execution, it could have been a little better. I would have liked a better carb source on the course (the honey was nice, but I don't think it was enough). Ultima alone does not do the trick. The only thing I hated about the course is the abrupt turnaround the cone. That's an inexcusable addition to any marathon course. Take us down a side street or through a parking lot or something. Anything but the cone. Overall, the pros far outweigh the cons on this race. Recommended.
4.0

By: Rose W.

Posted: October 08, 2009

A Perfect Day

I'll always have a soft spot for this race, since it was my first marathon in 2006 and it seemed fitting to come back this year for my tenth marathon. I don't mind the less-than-scenic areas, and I really like the out-and-back sections because they give me an opportunity to see the leaders and my friends who are faster (and slower) than I am. It seemed like there was a pretty long stretch after the St. John's Bridge with no aid stations - at least by the time that I got there.
5.0

By: Ramon Holguin

Posted: October 07, 2009

Portland, you're wonderful

Coming from a small, west-Texas town, I wanted to make my first marathon a memorable one. From the moment I signed up, I knew that I had chosen the right one. The organization was spot on. Watching over 10,000 participants can be no easy chore. My compliments to the organizers. I know the course was not through the scenic part of Portland, but then I understand the need for making a fast course as well as a viable one. Crossing the bridges made up for the run through the industrial area. The neighborhood after St. John's Bridge and the fans there were awesome! Offering encouragement as well as drinks and oranges showed me how supportive this city is of its marathon. Thank you, Portland, for a wonderful experience!!
5.0

By: Justine T.

Posted: October 07, 2009

Inadequate course nourishment

The course is nice. It's not gorgeous. More rolling than flat, but nice enough. My biggest complaint is the lack of a carbohydrate drink (there was water, and water with minerals - Ultima - combined with the lack of GU). Instead they had honey, in paper cups. What? You can't carry one of those.... And gummy bears, not what I want to put into my stomach for a marathon. Pretzels and orange slices would have been wonderful. I did carry my own nutrition, but of course I couldn't carry enough. I miss the days of plain old Gatorade. Races try and get too fancy nowadays. The shirt was cute, but the race is 58% women, and the shirt? A man's. Of course.
3.0

By: Steve A.

Posted: October 07, 2009

Portland is a Runner's Town!

I ran my first marathon in Portland (my home town) in 2000 and have run 10 others since. I am still on my quest for my BQ and thought this was the time. While I enjoyed the weather on the day, the wave start, the changes to the downtown portion of the course and the increased number of bands and spectators, I fell short of my goal again (though that's no fault of the course). Alas, I will try again. Thanks, Portland; it was fun!
5.0

By: Richard C.

Posted: October 06, 2009

Great Marathon

I graded the course a 5. Why? Because it's perfect for a PR, if you strategize correctly. The hill at 16 is just short enough to go slowly. You can afford to lose a minute here, because if you can hold on at pace for several miles past the bridge, there is a long downhill where you can gain back at least two minutes. I just PR'ed by 6 minutes (3:08) and couldn't be happier. My wife BQ'ed. All of our friends PR'ed. The spectators were more vocal than from the past times I've run this. And the weather was great - just right. I really love Portland as a destination. Our group drove down from Seattle and we were very impressed with this city.
5.0

By: Ben J.

Posted: October 06, 2009

Best marathon despite worst finish

I bonked hard at 17 miles - at the one and only significant hill of the course (approaching the Saint John's Bridge). That was ALL my fault, and despite this being my slowest marathon, the course, organization, and overall hospitality makes me rate it as the best of the three that I have run. I HIGHLY recommend this marathon to ANY level of runner. The course is flat and fast, and the pace groups were spot on. The weather is usually great at this time of year in Portland, and you honestly will not find nicer people than in Portland. The crowds were good for the size of race (10,000 runners) and there was WAY more music at this race than at the one Rock and Roll Marathon I experienced.
5.0

By: April K.

Posted: October 05, 2009

Watch Out for the Commuter Train

This race is a lot harder than it looks. It is not flat. But the most disappointing and surprising aspect came at mile 24 for me when the four-hour pace group (half of us) were stopped by a police officer for a commuter train. If you are concerned about time, I suppose it is the luck of the draw if you happen to get stopped by the train. Another person in our group got stopped at mile 5. In any event, the town is nice, the spectators are nice, and the view over the bridge was nice.
4.0

By: Adela M.

Posted: October 05, 2009

So close!

Five seconds... five seconds and I would've had a PR. Alas, I was stopped and had to wait for an Amtrak train within the last three miles. Ugh.... This race had the best fans I've seen. Nice people. And we got the best finisher's shirt I've received yet!
4.0

By: Nadia R.

Posted: October 05, 2009

Great weather; great city race

I have done 30 marathons in 5 different states and countries. This was one of the BEST moderately-sized city marathons that I have done thus far for a variety of reasons. It is very rare that I repeat a marathon unless I really like it, but I may repeat Portland. I ran it in 3:39 and my friend completed it in seven hours, so I have some advice to share that would help everyone. Negatives: 1. The race medal wasn't that great. 2. Porta-potties were an issue as we got closer to the race start. If you want to avoid this then get there early. I was there an hour before the start and had NO problem. When I was standing at the start, there was a bit chaos of people waiting in line for the restroom. It's a 10,000-runner race, so expect the lines as you get closer to the race start. Positives: 1. Weather was phenomenal for marathoning: 47 F at the start and 55 F at the finish. 2. The expo was great, with lots of free goodies like bars, granola, water bottles, etc. and there was plenty of exhibitors selling gear and racing items if you were interested. I left with a green pack completely filled with goodies instead of just fliers for other races. 3. Shirt: Long-sleeved, technical finisher's shirt for marathoners. 4. Spectator support is great for all runners: front and back of the pack. 5. Moderately-sized marathon of about 10,000 marathoners ONLY (no half-marathon :)), which is great because you won't get crowded by half-marathoners and they won't finish all of the finish-line goodies since they finish a couple hours before. The Portland race weekend is all about the marathoners! 6. Organization: Kudos to the race organizers!! They care about everyone equally, which is something very rare to find. They take care of all of the front-runners who are coming in in the 2:20's for males and 2:50's for females, and they stay out there to take care of all of the walkers who are coming in hours later; I saw it because I stayed out there waiting for my friend who came in at seven hours. They were so great that they were still hanging out there for any walkers until they stopped the clock at 10:55:55. Many marathons say that they have a course limit of 6:00:00, which means that is all that they paid their permits for so they start picking up everything at the finish line. Here they care about everyone and take care of everyone. My friend who came in at 7:00:00 said she still got plenty of food. 7. Volunteers of all ages were great - from little toddlers handing out gummy bears to grandparents cheering on everyone. 8. The finish line had tons of food, ranging from grapes, apples and bananas to cheese, bread, bagels, and chocolate milk. They do add their special touch by giving out space blankets, roses, a pin, and a tree seedling. 9. The course will be what you expect: A little hilly, but there is as much downhill as there is uphill. Just train and be prepared. Almost all of the complaints are about the industrial portion of the race, but it is not that big of a deal. It is a part of Portland that you get to see that you would not have seen otherwise.
4.0

By: Rusty W.

Posted: October 05, 2009

Say MY Name

I'm kind of surprised reading some of the other comments. This is my second full marathon and I really enjoyed it. My other was the Seattle Rock and Roll. I love the energy of a marathon - it doesn't matter where it is. There is nothing like waking up and seeing so many excited people heading for the start line. I liked that there was a wave start. I thought the course was good - I am not much for scenery, and I thought that Seattle R'n'R offered a BEAUTIFUL glimpse of the city BUT the hills were a killer. However, this race course did not have those same hills and I was very thankful for that. The race seemed well organized. I am not looking for anything special though. The best part about this race had to be the spectators. The fact that my name was on my bib and I had people cheering for me was great. (I kept thinking I must look really bad and in need of cheering if they kept saying it at times.) This was my favorite part of the run. I wish every marathon did this. I love that it is only a full, and you get your shirt at the end. It made me feel like I'd earned something. Seattle R'n'R spoiled me a little in the way of reunion areas; this one was too crowded and congested, but that is a small thing. I love the shirt - I have always loved the design. This is a good run.
4.0

By: Mike C.

Posted: October 05, 2009

Perfect First Marathon

Granted I have no other marathon to compare Portland to, but I can't imagine the race going any better for me. There were no organizational snags at all - from packet pickup to the finisher's chute, everything was super smooth. The spectators were great. I've never experienced anything like the last quarter-mile, with hundreds of people yelling my name and "Flight of the Valkyries" blaring over the loudspeaker. Just like their motto says, "Every Finisher is Treated Like a Winner" - even me, draggin' in at 4:26. The course was good as well. Granted I'm a Portlander, so I know the area - but really, running over the St. John's and Broadway Bridges is tres cool. And the out-and-back was great because I was able to see friends running who were both ahead of me (most) and behind me (a couple). My only nit is that while I love running the bridges, I wish they'd flip the course. The climb onto the Broadway Bridge (mile 23-24) was daunting - but I survived. Portland LOVES its runners and it shows.
5.0

By: Jaime K.

Posted: October 05, 2009

This is NOT the lovely city I know!

I have lived in Portland for only a few short months but already have found many gorgeous natural areas and cute, vibrant neighborhoods. This course shows you none of that. For much of the race, I felt like I could have been in any generic, industrial city. Aside from the St John's Bridge, this course is ugly. (And the bridge is torturous if you look south and see how far downtown looks... but that is not a criticism of the course). The out-and-back is weird; you finally break away from the pack, and 10 miles or so in, you're squashed into a mob again so everyone can be jammed into both sides of a two-lane road. The road up to the bridge is depressing - few spectators, a gradual climb, and the road is full of traffic. So, it is flat and fast, yes. Pretty and full of character? No. I wanted to tell out-of-towners, "No no... Portland really IS a great place, honest!" I know it costs money to close off roads, but it would be worth a try and you might even make up that lost revenue by having runners pay to return the next year! I, for one, will not be coming back. That said, the volunteers were great, parking was a breeze, the finish line food was good, space blankets are a great idea, and the shirt is my favorite ever!
4.0

By: Jayne S.

Posted: October 04, 2009

Nice weather, nice race

The Portland Marathon is a homegrown race that the city is justifiably proud of. I like the fact that the marathon is the main event. No half-marathon here. Much has been written about the course. While it is true that the course is drab, I was able to run a pretty fast time. In the end, a fast time is more satisfying than scenery. Unlike last year's rain, the weather was a bit breezy but perfect for a fast run. For an event that touts itself as being the best-organized marathon in North America, I was not impressed at all. While the organizers were boasting about another large marathon field, the start area could barely handle the 9,000 runners. It was too crowded and there weren't enough porta-potties. The lines for them were long and there was lots of confusion about where the end of the line was. The volunteers were great at all of the water stations. Again, more porta-potties are needed early in the race. There were long lines for each one during the first 10 miles of the race. In the out-and-back section, I waited in line for several minutes to use one. Another negative is that the race atmosphere lacked energy. It was quiet out on the course. There were few cheers from the spectators and course entertainers hardly acknowledged the runners. All in all, this is an okay race. The worst thing I can say about it is there is nothing special about this race that makes me want to come back.
3.0

By: Josh O.

Posted: August 04, 2009

I'm a Portlander and am disappointed in the course

I really feel bad for out-of-towners that come to this race. Portland has to be one of the best running cities in the nation but this course just does not represent that. It is not scenic at all. I still run the Portland Marathon most every year because my training group does, but I would not do it twice if it weren't my back yard. I will say that the fan turn out and support is spectacular every year. The way the finish comes into the city with the crowd is awesome. I do like the small out-and-back section because you get to see the super fast runners and also you realize just how many people are out there running.
4.0

By: Tyler G.

Posted: June 30, 2009

The course is not that bad; it's just not scenic

The wet weather bothered me more than the course. I read the past reviews and was expecting to be in industrial areas for much of the run. That's not the case. There are only two long stretches of the course that I remember as industrial. It is disappointing, though, that a more scenic route couldn't be found in this beautiful city. By the way, even the local running community complains about this course.
3.0

By: Kelly M.

Posted: January 08, 2009

Great for a first-timer!

Even though this was my first full marathon, I was impressed by the organization. Each aid station was labeled well, had many options (not just water, etc.) and was well-attended. The goody bag was great - a reusable grocery bag! The shirts were awesome - Dri-Fit, long sleeved. The finish was also really nice. There were TONS of food options and the roses and trees given out were a nice touch, too. It is somewhat difficult to find people after the race because the finish chute is so long. The worst part of the course was the uphill to St. John's Bridge, where no spectators were allowed. It rained during the race for the first time in many years, but didn't seem to affect anything much. I highly recommend this race.
4.0

By: Susan P.

Posted: October 22, 2008

Great quality bag/shirt but high elevations

This was the first time I ran the Portland Marathon. The weather was not ideal - rainy and cloudy - but it was not hot, and surprisingly the rain helped to cool me off during the run. The elevations were treacherous and the scenery during some parts of the run were less than ideal. I remember seeing homeless people sleeping under a bridge as we were passing by, which decreased my motivation for the run a bit. The goody bag was probably the best quality I have received out of any marathon - cloth bag vs. plastic bag. The medal was ok - nothing exciting. The finisher shirt was of excellent quality - Dri-FIT by Nike. Overall, I would recommend this marathon if you aren't a seriously competitive runner and if you are running for just enjoyment and fitness.
4.0

By: Cassie S.

Posted: October 21, 2008

The good with the bad

I am going to be nit-picky, because compared to the Bolder Boulder 10K, anything will seem disorganized. Pros: Incredible spectators (despite the rain), cool temperatures, plenty of fluids on the course, lots of food at the finish, and good pacers. The course is fast; don't worry about the hill before the bridge. Cons: The "goody bag" at the expo was pathetic and just contained a bunch of coupons. Biggest problem I had was at the start area: while the bag check folks were efficient, it was difficult to locate wave times and also difficult to join waves due to barricades/fencing along the street. It felt oddly mismanaged. A few miles before the finish, you run on a sucky highway section that is bizarrely devoid of spectators. Be ready for that over the hill, in my opinion. Overall: Fun, memorable, and plenty of places to drink microbrews afterward.
3.0

By: Rose W.

Posted: October 20, 2008

Did we run the same race?

After reading the comments, I wonder. There are references to things that I've never seen on this course. First, I like the out-and-back. It's the only time I'm going to be able to see the thousands of runners who are faster than I am. Even on scenic courses I've done, the scenery doesn't really register for me because I'm paying attention to my feet and legs and heart rate. We lost some spectators by the time the back of the pack came along because of the rain, and that's too bad. I had a great time and a 30:39 PR.
4.0

By: David T.

Posted: October 15, 2008

Portland is not a race run by runners

I think everyone should run the Portland Marathon once. Just once. The city and people are wonderful! The Red Lizards pacers are exceptional. Many times, though, I think those in charge of the race chose profit for their charities over the runners. A few examples. Not one time did I ever get an email from the organizers saying anything about the marathon, unless they were selling something. No emails of inspiration; nothing. Just sell, sell, sell. Got one today. Thanks for participating; if you care to donate more, just click. Profit over runner. There was no food on the course at all. Plenty of good fluids, but no food, unless you count gummy bears. I almost begged a spectator for food because I was so hungry at mile 23. I almost ate the seedling they gave you at the end because I was so hungry. Profit over runner. Why run 2.5 miles through an industrial park, turn around at a cone and 2.5 miles back when across the bridge are some of the most beautiful neighborhoods in Portland? Money. No spectators in the industrial park, but in the neighborhoods, lots of them. It costs money to block off roads. Profit over runner. The medal was below average. I ran the Portland, MI Half Marathon (150 runners) this summer and a got a much better medal, by far. Profit over runner. The TSA-like security at the start made it difficult to reach the pace groups. They were letting runners into race area two at a time. Do the math; 8,000 people. Eeeek, what a mess. It would have been nice to buy a nice technical shirt that you could actually run in instead of a cotton, poly mix, but that costs more money too. Profit over runner. All this being said, please run the Portland Marathon; the organizers put in a ton of work. It is well organized and they do care; the runners just have to come first, and right now they do not.
4.0

By: sue b.

Posted: October 14, 2008

Great organization; course was a little dull

This was my 3rd marathon this year, and my first Portland. I thought the expo was great; I went twice! We stayed at the host hotel, which was great, and Portland was a great city for shopping and dining. The course was a little disappointing, with a lot of industrial areas and the fact that it was pouring with rain didn't add to the ambiance. The spectators were great - especially after the bridge, when it was pretty much downhill to the finish. The end of the race was incredible and really sets the bar for all other finish lines. We got a medal, food, drinks, a rose, a great long-sleeve finisher's shirt, a pin and a tree - better than Christmas day!!! I did a PB despite a lot of walking. I would definitely recommend it. There are lots of aid stations and porta-potties. You just couldn't fault the organization.
4.0

By: Maura B.

Posted: October 14, 2008

Great City, Good Race

I feel compelled to defend Portland a bit. Having read comments and reviews on MG.com for a few years now, I knew this race would have an industrial stretch, so perhaps that's why it didn't bother me. Any deficit this provided was well made up for with its organization, tons of enthusiastic volunteers, spectators, generous spacing of water/electrolytes stations/porta-potties, and the fact that this course is entirely closed to vehicles. Unlike a previous reviewer, I was pleased to find Ultima as the fluid on the course. I'm pretty certain that if they'd wanted, Portland could have had any of the commercially known giants sponsor electrolytes, but consciously chose Ultima. They've used it for two years, and though it's only my opinion, they should switch to a better replacement fluid, without a doubt. Moving on: nice finisher's T handed out as you leave, as well an OR seedling tree to plant in commemoration of the race. Finally, this is a beautiful, lively city with much to offer the traveling marathoner. It rained, but Portland did not disappoint!
4.0

By: Sam S.

Posted: October 13, 2008

Off year for Portland

The negative reviews are not surprising. The rainy weather brings out the flaws with this marathon course. If the organizers could incorporate the upscale Pearl District into the start of the course, it would shorten the out-and-back section in the railroad yard. For all of the hills, this is a deceptively fast course. This year's expo was boring. I don't know what was missing; but, after a couple of minutes in there, I wanted to leave. To end on a positive note, the spectators at the finish line are great. The finish area is the best organized of any marathon I've run.
3.0

By: Todd O.

Posted: October 11, 2008

Race organization definitely needs improving

The expo and course management were the biggest detractors for this marathon. They actually stopped runners at around the halfway point to allow traffic to go through (thought this was suppose to be a closed course?). The fan support was fantastic, and despite quite a few railroad tracks, I liked the course. (How could I not? I PR'd).
4.0

By: John H.

Posted: October 11, 2008

A good event in a great city.

It's really hard to say anything bad when you are able to run a marathon on your sixtieth birthday! People should quit complaining about the out-and-back section in the industrial area because there are a lot of other runners to look at, and I had several friends ahead of me to shout at. The rain was a bit annoying, but mostly because I cleverly ditched my hat before the race started. The event is well organized and the fans were very supportive, even on a soggy day. And Portland is a great city to visit.
5.0

By: Tom McManus

Posted: October 10, 2008

My favorite marathon

Having broken the 4-hour mark and PR'd in Portland, I may have some bias, but this is the race where it happened, and that gives me a very good feeling. I like the course = it is mostly flat and the hill was where I finally caught up to the red lizard 4:00 pace sign. Cool weather is a plus. Good entertainment and fans. Great support at water stops and kids reading out times at the mile markers (though some of them need to speak up).
4.0

By: Bree W.

Posted: October 10, 2008

Great race!

I enjoyed Portland. The course was much more industrial than I had hoped, but Portland itself is a great town. It's true that there were a number of downhills, but there were also a few uphills, including a pretty big incline between miles 16 and 17.
4.0

By: C. T.

Posted: October 10, 2008

Great city and well organized race

This was my third full marathon and first Portland Marathon. I had heard the complaints about the industrial area of the course for the last few years, so I knew what to expect and didn't think it was that bad. Not scenic by any measure but it was flat. If you want the really scenic stuff, it's going to be VERY hilly. Downtown, the view going across the St. John's Bridge, the neighborhood just after the bridge, and some other small pocket neighborhoods were all fantastic. It was rainy (mist, drizzle, rain) off and on most of the time, but it didn't keep the spectators from coming out to support the runners and walkers. The expo was somewhat small, but it had some great vendors and was well organized. The volunteers were great, but aid stations were somewhat difficult to locate. The finish area was well organized and stocked with a variety of food. I really like the tree seedling, and the tech finisher shirt is nice. It's definitely a race worth running again.
4.0

By: Paige D.

Posted: October 09, 2008

A great first marathon!

This was my first full marathon, but I've run lots of half-marathons and I'm the race director for a couple of 5K/10Ks. The organization was superb, the crowd support outstanding, the volunteers incredible, and other than my stomach tanking at 35K, there wasn't a thing I'd change!
5.0

By: Kate W.

Posted: October 09, 2008

overrated and hyped-up marathon

I was one of the "lucky" participants to run the '08 marathon, where we had rain for the majority of the race. The course to me was hyped up to be a nice run, but I found it to be too industrial and boring. Choking down diesel fumes for many miles in the early stages left much to be desired. The use of non-mass marketed items on the course was another down for me. I was not about to try PureGold Gel the day of! The surface of the roads left me feeling like I had run a trail race, as I had to constantly look down to make sure I was not running into a pothole or slick manhole cover. Getting stopped by a train for close to a minute at mile 25 was just a kick in the face at that point. The shirt and medal are ordinary, though I do like the fact that the only people that are able to wear them are those who actually finished the race. (You receive your shirt at the finish line.) I found the expo to be average for this size event. There were a few pros to this race: 1. The wave start was great. 2. The volunteers on the course were great, as was the placement of water. I just didn't care for gummy bears at places with no fluids. I would not run this race again with the current course. I think that there must be pretty places in Portland, just none on this course. I will not recommend this race to people. For all the hype online for this race, it was a huge disappointment for both myself and my boyfriend (who also ran the marathon).
2.0

By: doug c.

Posted: October 09, 2008

good organization, bland course

The Portland Marathon is pretty well organized. They do a good job separating the runners from the walkers by starting them at separate locations. As for the course itself, it does not highlight The Rose City. Having to run past a railroad yard, lumber warehouses, and factories makes the course pretty bland. You also have to be careful of the potholes on Front Ave. (when running through that industrial area). The best part of the course comprised the last 8 miles of mostly declines. Having the marathon course in the Portland City Limits would be nice, but it would be a lot hillier. Weather was nice and overcast. The rain did not slow me down. Because of the course, I would not do this marathon again.
3.0

By: Deb R.

Posted: October 08, 2008

Great volunteers, industrial course

The light rain was inconvenient, but the course was flat, even downhill much of the time. I always hear that Oregon is beautiful, but I didn't see any of that on the course. Volunteers were outstanding!
4.0

By: Chelsea M.

Posted: October 06, 2008

I'm just glad it's over ;-)

First six miles were amazing. Fantastic ambiance, plenty to see, fantastic bands. Really fizzled out by the time I hit the halfway point though. For a marathon that boasts about having over 70 acts on the course... it's funny how like 10 miles went by with nothing to look at other than industrial wasteland, and car exhaust to suck in. If my iPod hadn't stopped working at mile 10, I probably would have enjoyed it a bit more; however, I thought this was supposed to be an entertaining marathon. The hobos passed out on both sides of the street at like mile 23 were an interesting addition, not to mention the strange man who was trying to sell "energy drink" to those of us running. Great gear-check system, and fantastic refreshment handling on the course, though they did not have very vegan-friendly finisher's food. Fruit looked horrible; even in my state, I couldn't stomach brown apples and mushy-looking oranges. Great finisher shirt.
3.0

By: Ted G.

Posted: October 06, 2008

wet but worth it

If you missed this year, you missed out. The expo was great and number pick-up was easy. Portland finally gated off the start area to keep out friends and family - no bib, no entry. The wave start is such a great idea; all big races should do it. Course support was super and there were lots of porta-potties on the course. I have done 41 marathons and no one has better food at the finish than Portland. The finisher's shirt was great this year. OK, it was a little wet, but if you run in the Northwest, you learn to run in the rain. Way to go, Portland Marathon Committee! Oh, and my wife and her friends are all OOHHING and AWWING over the Nike-designed women's Portland Marathon jacket.
4.0

By: Dave M.

Posted: October 06, 2008

Timing Issues?

This was my 4th Portland Marathon. I registered at the expo, coughing up the $150 fee. I had a great race, and ran a PR of 2:55. Only bummer is that my name is not in the results. After several calls and emails to the Portland Marathon office, I'm disappointed.
3.0

By: Dave W.

Posted: October 01, 2008

Overrated - they're phoning it in

I've run Portland 4 times - once on a previous course, three times on the current course. It's a convenient marathon for me to get to, but I don't expect to run it again. The volunteers are wonderful, but the rest of the race is ordinary at best. I think it's overrated. If you know how beautiful Portland is, you'll be amazed to find such an ugly course. The amount of time in the industrial area is excessive. The stretch of highway out to the bridge is ho-hum (and it's open to vehicle traffic). The bridge is lovely, but the climb is pretty steep. Also, the marathon's website doesn't show the steep downhill and subsequent climb after the bridge (check out the MarathonGuide.Com elevation profile for an accurate take). The marathon is run by an all-volunteer staff, and that's great. But I get the feeling that the upper ranks are phoning it in, as they say. I never received a finisher's certificate or results book (both were promised in the registration materials for 2007). In April (six months after the marathon), I emailed the organization via their website and got a response telling me they were still working on the book. Subsequent emails and phone calls have gone unanswered. It's not that anything is horrible about the Portland Marathon. It's just ordinary and overrated. Maybe it's me, but it's seemed a little less special each time I've run it (first time in 1991, last time in 2007).
3.0

By: Burton O.

Posted: August 19, 2008

Terrific race and outstanding organization

This was my 10th Portland Marathon and it sets the standard for me to evaluate other races. They do a great job pre-race, along the course and post-race. Throughout the year, they also send you communication to make you really feel like a part of the Portland Marathon family. As for the actual race, the course has a few minor hills, so I would suggest driving it before race day. There is a slight, steady incline after mile 11 that can sneak up on you and the climb up to St. Helen's Bridge can be a bear, but overall, nothing you shouldn't be able to handle. Be sure to have some fun and launch a gummy bear off the middle of the bridge! =) Weather is usually perfect for running. Can be cold at the start, but you could easily hand off gear to family around along the waterfront. There is usually a slight headwind along miles 6-9, and again on St. Helen's Road. Conversely, if the sun is out, it can get very warm in the later stages of the race along Greeley/Interstate Blvd. Support along the course is top notch. Entertainment is okay... but this is not supposed to be the a rock 'n roll run, so enjoy what you get! The last several blocks to the finish are inspiring with lots of people cheering you on. The actual finish area is about the best in the business and they do a great job limiting it to just runners. As your reward for finishing, you'll get a space blanket, nice medal, pine tree seedling and lots of post-race snacks. Just be sure to coordinate where to meet your family/friends after wards so you can share all your great memories from your awesome day of racing!
5.0

By: Lou J.

Posted: May 20, 2008

Not a scenic course

The Portland Marathon has doubled in size since I last ran it, so it must be doing something right. The race is held at the perfect time of year in Portland, a very pretty city with great neighborhoods. However, the marathon course does not highlight the city. Instead, the course includes runs through rail yards (out & back) and down long industrial stretches. The organizers of the Portland Marathon do a good job in putting on this race. They have corrected all the past mistakes and handled the growth well. In my opinion, it has gotten stale. The same finisher shirt, the same old course, even the same course entertainment.
4.0

By: Joseph A.

Posted: January 27, 2008

Good course, well-organized

I ran the Portland Marathon in '06 and '07, and I found it very well organized and executed. While 2007 was slightly different in the start due to construction downtown, it was no problem for me to stage appropriately 15-20 minutes before the gun. Later than that, you will probably have to climb over barriers to get up to stage. I would recommend going on the bus tour ($5) on Saturday. I took it in 2007. It was very informative, and I wish I took it in 2006. There are a few hills/overpasses/ramps/bridges in the last 10K, I wish I knew about beforehand. I thought the course was harder than I was led to believe from the website. You can sign up for the bus tour at the expo. There are not many spectators on the West side before the St John's bridge; most just seemed curious and were just standing with hands in pockets. Conversely, the crowds are pretty supportive on the East side. I really enjoyed the event pictures; they did a super job. Please be aware the pacers may not be that accurate. I believe in both years the 3:30 pacers went out too fast. In 2007, I ignored them, and was able to reach my BQ goal. Other online forums refer to problems with the pacers for other target times. Weather conditions were good both times; '06 was cool and clear while '07 was overcast with some perceptible wind from the south (TV said 10 mph).
4.0

By: Tracy M.

Posted: January 23, 2008

PR... Portland Rocks!!!!

What an amazing experience! I PR'd by 18 minutes and turned in my first sub-4 hour marathon. Portland is such an awesome city to run a marathon in! The weather was absolutely perfect! I thought the course was fabulous. Running through the industrial area was fine by me! It's a part of Portland you don't get to see otherwise. I felt a little toasted on the hill up to St. John's Bridge; however, it was somewhat short and the view was amazing from the top. Running on the other side of the river was totally cool and very different from the city side. The support was great and the crowds were very encouraging. The people of Portland are so friendly and really embrace the marathon! The pacers were right on! I hung on to a group faster than I wanted to go until the St. Johns Bridge, but kept them in sight. I ended up running over 4 minutes faster than anticipated! Thanks to Les and Nadine for inspiring me to be a better person and athlete!
5.0

By: Robert D.

Posted: January 19, 2008

A solid race, worth doing once.

Organization is good for this race; the only disappointment was lack of food/water at start. Finish area had plenty of refreshments. The race was well stocked with drinks, even handed out gummy bears, gels, and honey sticks. The course is a little harder than the website makes it out to be. You have two major hills - one early (no problem), in the first couple of miles, and then the long run to the St. John Bridge. The part that isn't shown correctly is the rolling hills on the backside. The weather was very good (mid 50's); however, there was a headwind coming back of about 10 mph, which makes the second half definitely harder than the first. The finisher shirt is nice (technical), and the medal was well designed. The people of Portland are very friendly and the food in Portland is good. The city embraces the marathon with plenty of spectators throughout the course.
4.0

By: Mark H.

Posted: December 06, 2007

Great experience - will run it again!

This was my first marathon and this experience has left me wanting to continue my effort at becoming a runner. The course was just as described, support from the aid workers was outstanding and I have never experienced that much support in other types of road races. The shirt, medal, rose, tree and finish line experience were all outstanding. I really appreciated the fact they allow MP3 players.
4.0

By: Jason H.

Posted: November 30, 2007

Great volunteers and organization, course lacking

This was my first marathon and I am from the area. I had a fantastic experience that has me thirsty for more. I was amazed at the encouragement from the volunteers on the course. I always run solo and had never run with others. They were very personable and at the finish they were very helpful. Getting my bib and shirt was all very easy. Had to go to many places but they had signs up at every turn and entrance. Being from the area I was disappointed in the course. Way to much industrial area. Portland is such a beautiful city, but the course doesn't really take you to those areas. I was also surprised at the hills. Being my first marathon, I thought that the main hill started at mile 14 and ended around mile 19. Had a great time at this race.
4.0

By: Brandon L.

Posted: October 30, 2007

This is THE walkers marathon! Please read on

If you have never been to Portland you are in for a treat! The city was very nice and the food was beyond amazing! We took the max light train from the airport to salmon st. and walked about a block to the hotel. It only cost 2 bucks. The marathon was great- scenic- amazing- etc. etc. Even the industrial section was nice as it provided for a real feel. You go through a nice mix of everything! If you are a walker you MUST do Portland. You wont be disappointed. My only gripe was a lack of porta potties at the miles 3-7 (expect a 5-8 min wait) and the fact that there were no volunteers at miles 25.5 and beyond and we actually got lost and wound up in a street fair where everyone look at us like we were crazy (oblivious that a marathon was going on) we had to backtrack and wonder around for a while until we stumbled onto the finish. This really upset me. The last miles are suppose to be enjoyable not mass confusion- Btw we finished well under the 8 hour limit. Other than these 2 glitches everything was good. TAKE THIS ADVICE.. It IS Portland so be prepared for piercing cold and rain...You never know. If you can spend an extra day or two there I advise it as well. Yes it is that good!
5.0

By: Jean (Mama Jean) Evansmore

Posted: October 26, 2007

Light rail is wonderful!

This was my 6th marathon in 4 weeks and the emphasis was on WALK, rest & enjoy! The fact that I didn't need a car was a real bonus! Stayed at Country Inns & Suites by airport. Best complimentary breakfast ever. Has a pool & hot tub also. Very helpful staff. I started at the back of the pack as I'm slow. The person who had a problem getting around walkers needs to learn how to develop an exit plan: look ahead, move around, twist at the shoulders, suck it up and get going. No one is there for your convenience. OK, so you had to walk a bit @ expo and you saw an industrial area. WOW!Like cities that aren't afraid to show you good, bad and ugly. Did New Orleans earlier this year. That's life. Loved the all-female band at top of hill before going over bridge. They were having a good time also,so I stayed a bit, enjoyed music and took pictures. Really dislike bridges because of concrete. Man alongside me heard the comment and educated me about the history of the bridges. Perspective changed. Got good photos also. Guy in red was a very enthusiastic cheerleader. Saw and heard him often. Food! Lot of it and a variety @ my 6:37:05 finish! Slower runners don't usually experience that. Nice touch with students involved in handing out trees, roses and pins...(lost mine). A big area to greet and hang out for a bit was really nice. As was said earlier, this was a marathon, not a party. Be prepared or just suck it up and do it! Who has the energy to listen to you whine? Enjoy and be thankful you can do it! I would highly recommend this race and suggest you stay if you can. I really liked what I saw.
4.0

By: Todd J.

Posted: October 25, 2007

Good energy, perfect weather, nice downhills!

This was my second marathon and I had a great time and got a PR. There is a tough uphill that comes at a tough spot (mile 17ish), but all kinds of downhill after that. The temps couldn't have been better, the crowd had good energy, and the volunteers / aid station workers were great.
4.0

By: James M.

Posted: October 18, 2007

Worth the Trip

Overall, this was an enjoyable marathon. Some aspects of it were exceptional: The expo was great and well organized. The start line setup was extremely well organized, with plenty of port-a-pots and, wisely, a wave start. The support from spectators was awesome. There were more finishers' 'goodies' than any other race I've done, from the nice shirt to the rose, the fir seedling, and the lapel pin. There are a couple areas which, in my opinion, could use improvement... 1. I've never been to Portland before, but I can only imagine there must be more scenic areas of the city in which to run. They could probably eliminate the out and back by the RR tracks. 2. The finishing area was way too crowded. Why was the park area blocked off? We had to stay on the street by the park, and at the time I came in we were crowded 'shoulder to shoulder' all the way past the reunion area. 3. This isn't really an area for improvement, but the course is a little more difficult than some might expect. Personally, I hardly noticed the hill at the beginning, but St. John's Bridge really zapped me; it is a relatively long, steady rise. (But it might have just been me.) There's a relatively steep drop around mile 25. 4. Another aid station or two (mile 17?) wouldn't hurt. Extending the early aid stations to both sides of the street might help. More port-a-pots in the first few miles would help, too. By the way, if you aren't from the West Coast, plan to spend a week in Oregon. We're from the Midwest and this was our first trip. It won't be our last. What a beautiful state! Between the marathon and the Oregon scenery, this race is well worth the trip.
4.0

By: Wayne Blaine

Posted: October 15, 2007

A great first marathon and a wonderful experience

I enjoyed it all! The logistics were well thought out. The website is fantastic and upgraded continuously during race week. The wave start went real well. I was never crowded or slowed by other runners. How can anyone whine about the industrial area? It was sooooooooo flat and fast. I ran the St. John's approach, at my normal pace. This was better than the decline after mile 19. The aid stations had Ultima, Klucose and water, in that order. While I don't care for the taste, Ultima does the job, without the carbs. The gels and Klucose took care of the carbs. The finish was great and I had no problem with the reunion area. They gave a finisher's shirt and medal - and I already planted my finisher's tree! Names on bibs - nice touch. Race statistics on the website are impressive. Results available same day and photos in a couple days.
5.0

By: Bill R.

Posted: October 15, 2007

Organization lacking; ok course; great volunteers

Some folks must have run a different marathon than I did. I've run 35 marathons, from very large (Chicago) to very small (Breakers) and I have never had to jump through so many hoops to get my number, chip, shirt, and bag. These were all separate pickups. The chip and number were in the same room. The shirt was down a parking ramp and the bag was in a third location. The early water stops were seriously understaffed. It was nearly impossible to get out of the finish area. The run was okay. It seemed that a lot of the course was run in industrial areas. It definitely was not worth the trip, and this is the first marathon I have run about which I can say this.
3.0

By: john l.

Posted: October 13, 2007

Top-notch organization

Gummy bears, Red Bull, and Starbucks Mud Pies.... I've never seen such an assortment of treats offered at a marathon! And that's just to name a few. I choose marathons primarily for the course but it's always an added bonus when the organizers go above and beyond to take care of the runners/walkers. What was really nice was that there was plenty of food at the finish line even for the back-of-the-packers like myself (not a given at all races). I didn't find the much-talked about out-and-back portion of the course in the industrial part of town very appealing. (Though a friend of mine who's a Portland native actually likes it because of the people -watching opportunities it presents.) I wasn't too crazy about the long road leading to the St. John's Bridge either (also in an industrial section). However once I was on the St. John's Bridge, I soon realized why I made the trip to Portland - I come from America's finest city but the view from the bridge was enough to make anyone envious of any Portland native with access to do their daily runs there. The finisher's medal is my favorite one to date... it's absolutely gorgeous. As mentioned in another post, the MAX light rail train makes getting around extremely convenient. I completely agree with the comment that the drums would've been better suited towards the end of the race rather than near the start. The beats gave me such an adrenaline rush that I had to make a conscious effort to reign myself in and not to start too fast... you just can't help but get pumped up.
5.0

By: Larry J.

Posted: October 13, 2007

Won't be let down

My first time to run/walk this marathon. The course has a good mixture of hills and flats. Running over the bridges is a fun twist to a road race. I received lots of "personal" encouragement from spectators because my name was plastered on my bib. Perhaps the race organizers could arrange with the host hotel to allow "free" access to the hot tub for hotel guests that participated in the marathon. Only letdown would be the generic design and basic fabric of the finisher's shirt. We'll be back again.
4.0

By: Daryl L.

Posted: October 13, 2007

Good race - and much better than the alternative!

I was registered for Chicago but ran Portland at the last minute after following the weather forecasts in Chicago. Definitely was the correct decision. Hadn't trained for the hills (really only one that mattered), but well worth the trade-off given the perfect running weather in Portland. Constructive suggestions: * Bag check was difficult to locate, especially in the dark, and inconveniently located inside the start chute. Move it outside of the chute and mark it with lights. * Agree with the comment about not enough access to inside the start chute. Resulted in a lot of runners elbowing their way toward the front to reach their pace groups. * This one's very minor, but no way the half-marathon mat was .1 mile past the Mile 13 marker. Try to make sure distances are accurate. Now the pluses, and there were many: * Weather was perfect: cloudy & cool. * Spectator and volunteer support were wonderful. * Good-sized race; lots of runners but never felt crowded. * Sufficient number of aid stations. * Excellent finish area. Food was great - all the basics (water, sports drink, chocolate milk, bananas, other fruit, bagels), plus the ice cream sandwiches. Also liked keeping the finish chute area separate from spectators, although it was a bit chaotic at the exit. Setting up chairs for tired runners also a nice touch. * Downtown Portland is nice and provides easy access to start and finish from several nearby hotels. Overall, a good race. I'd run it again.
4.0

By: Zach Klemo

Posted: October 12, 2007

for a first-timer, nothing better

I love this marathon. This was my second marathon and second Portland Marathon, and once again I had a great time running it. The volunteers are wonderful, the aid stations always have what you need, and the organization allows you to focus on the running and not worry about the small details. I especially like the race details on the website showing where you finished in relation to the overall winner, the average runner, etc. With the available talent in Portland, the one aspect that could be improved would be the bands along the route. I can't wait until next year.
5.0

By: Terry N.

Posted: October 12, 2007

What a great run in a great town!

This was a great marathon. There were some parts of the course that didn't grace the city but I have found that in most places. The organization was generally top-notch and the little extras - a rose and tree to finishers - support, cheering crowds, and weather were all great. The changes: move the baggage check away from the starting area so late checkers aren't blocking the start. I know this may have been dictated by construction downtown. Also, I found drinks at the water stations confusing at best. I had not used either of the electrolyte drinks in training so it was a crap shoot as to which one to try. I didn't like either much and I guess I would have preferred water and Gatorade. Overall, I really liked the marathon and Portland is a jewel that I hope to visit again.
4.0

By: Sweets C.

Posted: October 11, 2007

wonderful first marathon

Loved It Loved It!! Had a wonderful 1st marathon experience in portland. Great fans, vols., and entertainment. Could have done without the headwind coming back into the start, but better than rain! Would suggest this marathon to everyone!
5.0

By: Deborah I.

Posted: October 11, 2007

Well done marathon!

I had heard only good things about the Portland Marathon, and I have to concur! The marathon was well organized and well supported. I stayed at the Hilton, and the start/finish were just around the corner. The spectators were friendly and supportive... the police provided traffic control... and the aid stations were plentiful. Someone even kept the fore-casted rain away until after the marathon! I am a walker and found support throughout the marathon. The course was also very well marked... which I appreciated! Thanks for a great marathon experience!
5.0

By: Rachel W.

Posted: October 11, 2007

Great course and a great city

This was my first marathon, and I am so glad that I chose Portland. The volunteers and spectators were great, the course was a bit challenging for a flatlander from Chicago, but still completely manageable, and all in all, I had a fabulous time.
5.0

By: Alexis D.

Posted: October 10, 2007

Loved the race

Loved the race! I agree with what others already have posted.
5.0

By: Stephen H.

Posted: October 10, 2007

A must-do marathon!!

Wonderful experience. Great organization, great volunteers, great spectators, and great entertainment. Mostly flat course that winds through of a beautiiful city. Lots of aid stations with plenty of supplement choices. Great after-finish reception and healthy food to eat.
5.0

By: Heidi W.

Posted: October 10, 2007

Good race overall

As a visitor to Portland, I found almost everything to be very good - even that out-and-back course. My biggest complaint (and I hope they'll make a change next year) is about the walkers. Please, please, please either start the walkers later or have them in their own corral. I'm a slow runner and by the time I tried getting around the walkers (who completely forgot their etiquette), it was mile 6. I never was able to catch up with the running group. It then became de-motivating to even run while everyone around me was walking. Still, I ran almost the entire race. I think it's fine that a race promoted itself to walkers, but the director needs to segment both groups. I start in the back because I don't want faster runners to have to expend more energy to get around me. Same should go for the walkers. Portland produced a great race, nonetheless.
4.0

By: Anita H.

Posted: October 10, 2007

Most walker friendly

WOW! This was THE most walker friendly marathon I have ever done! All of the people at the expo, all the volunteers, even the local news paper pointed out that walkers are athletes too! I have done 12 other marathons and have sometimes felt that the walkers are sub standard participants in marathons, especially according to the elitists. Just because I choose to walk and not run, makes me no less of an athlete than any of the runners. In fact, I have to have more stamina than they do in order to continue walking for 6 hours! The volunteers and crowd support were amazing! I think there were just as many volunteers as there were participants! It was great to get a rose from a volunteer, and have them say Congratulations when they gave it to me! The one thing I would change is the music along the course. I applaud all the volunteer bands, groups, etc and appreciate them being there. However, hearing Joan Baez towards mile 20 did not give me much oomph. Maybe those awesome drummers could be more towards the end, rather than the beginning of the race. Also, more groups with upbeat music styles would help. Otherwise this was an AWESOME race. Thanks to all who helped make it possible!
5.0

By: Charles M.

Posted: October 10, 2007

Great experience - This was my first marathon

Everything was great except there weren't enough toilets for the first five to ten miles. The waits were about 5 minutes. A special thanks to all the volunteers. It was great to here them call out your name saying 'great job Chuck' This was a very nice touch.
5.0

By: Teresa L.

Posted: October 10, 2007

Great Marathon - Fun City

This was my 21st different marathon. Pros: Long sleeved tech shirt They provided 2 electrolytes: Ultima (yech) and Glykos (good). Lots of activity on the course - very lively. St. John's bridge was gorgeous. On a scale of 1-10 for difficulty, I would say 4. Its not hilly, but where the hills are that hurts. Very organized finish area. Cons: Not enough port-o-potties at start. The lines still existed at the start of the race. The out and back stretch - I knew it would be bad, but not this bad. This stretch showcases absolutely nothing that Portland has to offer. Lowest point of the race. The expo was too crowded and chaotic. Overall, I really enjoyed this marathon and our stay in Portland.
4.0

By: Bob F.

Posted: October 09, 2007

This is a great place to run a marathon

The organization was flawless; and the run was safe and well stocked with water, supplements, volunteers and folks looking out for our safety. The fans were great and the finish was perfect, just around the corner and you're done. The finish area was well stocked with food and people to help us get over the run. But the best was: ice cream at the finish. This is why I run!
4.0

By: Terry C.

Posted: October 09, 2007

Fantastic job, all around

First, I want to rave about the volunteers who staffed the race. All stations were well-supplied, and I especially liked the Red Bull station near the end. The finish area was very well organized, and I've never seen cleaner porta-potties in my life (and I was at the back of the pack!). The marathon literature covered all the essentials; any questions we had were answered right away; everyone was great! This race was especially meaningful to me, as one of the race directors recently passed from MS complications, and I have MS and run with a disability. I kept Nadine in mind when the going got tough. The musicians, cheerleaders, and spectators were also first-rate. I really liked the fact that the start line, expo, and finish line were all close together, too. The only downside for me was that the walkers were shifted onto sidewalks after 1 p.m., and we had to stop for stoplights and even two MAX light-rail trains before the finish. Otherwise, a great event! I hope to return again within a year or two.
5.0

By: Mike K.

Posted: October 09, 2007

Portland Embraces It's Marathon and The Runners

Had a great day!!! Course provided interesting changes. Plenty of aid/water station with fluids, goodies and friendly, encouraging volunteers. Friendly pacers, Great entertainment, Excellent weather, Wonderful support at finish, Friendly runners. Vibrant, encouraging Spectators. Nice shirt, metal, pin, rose and seeding. Tasty foods and fluids at finish. The Expo needs more space.
4.0

By: Steve Stillman

Posted: October 09, 2007

Great Marathon Weather

Loved the weather (nice and cool with a few minor sprinkles) and the course. Nice views along large portions of the course. Two bridges. Easy to get to start via MAX light rail system. The only con I found was the confusion over where to drop your clothes bag and where to pick it up at the end.
5.0

By: Natalie Whitson

Posted: October 09, 2007

Not as pretty as Eugene but had a great time

This was my second marathon - first was Eugene this spring. I joked that Portland has good enough self-esteem that it doesn't mind showing visitors its ugly side (whereas you run along the river and through Pre's trail in Eugene.) Everything was as they described it, I had no dissapointments about the route or the start, food and water were good except that they ran out of gummy bears on the course for us slower types. Seems that the shirt was improved, as they did not give out turtle necks this year. Perfect weather, no deluge and no Chicago-style heat either. People were great! I'll be back.
4.0

By: 50 States R.

Posted: October 08, 2007

OK race

For the most part the race was good. The shirt is decent and it was nice to have a choice in color (blue or white)and they actually had size small. The start line needed more entry points to get into your pace area. You either needed to elbow your way thru loads of people or hop the fence. Most were hopping the fence. The course is ok- typical for a city race but not terribly scenic. The water stations were spaced differently each time, from 0.4 to what seemed like 3 miles in the hilly section, which made it hard to plan gel strategy. The city of Portland is great though and the weather was good.
4.0

By: Nicholas Konkol

Posted: October 08, 2007

Excellent event! My second favorite marathon!

There are aid stations with a perfect spread throughout the course along with everything a runner could want in an aid station - gummy bears, sports drinks, gel packs at mile 18, etc. The scenery is nice on the bridges and in downtown Portland. The scenery in the neighbor hoods is average. The bands, cheer-leading squads, helpers, and spectators are superb. I have run it twice now, and it has not rained. And the temperature has been great each time. The hills are tough, but build character.
4.0

By: Troy B.

Posted: March 02, 2007

Great race but ugliest shirts ever for finishers

Portland is a great race on a pretty level course. There is one minor hill, but for the most part the race is a breeze. Spectators are great and you get just enough of them along the way. Race could be a little more scenic if it did not go through the northwest industrial area, but rather ran up and out over Terwilliger - just a suggestion for course designers. The run through NoPo is great and the guys handing out PBRs at mile 24 are pretty funny. Food after the finish is great; fruit and drinks and ice cream and yogurt, and the list goes on. I liked the little Doug Fir seedling given to everyone, as well as the rose. Now for my dislikes, there is only one: the finisher's shirts are the most god awful, ugly creation I have ever laid eyes on. I was hoping they would change them this year, seeing they have had the same design for the past few years, but nope. It is this cheesy-looking, mock-turtleneck, cheap-wicking shirt. I have never worn mine due to the fact that I think mock turtlenecks died out around 1997, along with pinch rolling my jeans. So if anyone is looking for a size small finisher's shirt, please take mine, or I will wait ten more years when it has a vintage look to it, and I will be the talk of the town.
5.0

By: Connie A.

Posted: October 17, 2006

Great race; I'll do this again!

The Portland Marathon was the perfect fit for my first marathon. Not too flat, not too hilly, plentiful support and the spectators were entertaining. The only thing I would change is the merge at the two mile, the location of the expo was too small for all the people, and lastly, the reunion area needed to be spread out. The finisher's chute was very nice with lots of snacks and it was filled with only the finishers and volunteers. The seedling and rose were the frosting on the cake for me.
5.0

By: Tory K.

Posted: October 14, 2006

An Excellent Race!

I'm not sure what all the whining is about! People! This is a marathon, not a dinner party on Nob Hill. The course is great... very flat (the person who said it is difficult must be joking). The only hills were one biggie at mile 17 and another rather small one. You want hills, head north and run Whidbey! Difficult course... ha! Spectators were awesome! There were hardly ANY spots where there wasn't someone cheering us on. I love having my name on my bib because hearing people yell "Go T!" makes a fantastic difference! The water stations were, by far, the best organized stations I've seen. I've run five marathons and a number of halves and shorter races (and one 30K). I've met up with no water at water stations, passing by because the volunteers were chatting rather than passing out cups, or stations that were so small that you had to wait in line or just run on. Not once did I even have to walk through a water station. Porta-potties were plentiful if you showed up to the race early, as was gear drop. The book given out at the expo clearly showed the best places for spectators to meet us on the route. My husband was able to cheer me on in a number of areas. They even had a procedure for handling "towers" who ran in their runners to the finish, as my husband did. The entertainment was SO much fun... great variety and lots of energy. I don't think I've run a single marathon where there hasn't been SOME nasty looking areas, so running through the industrial area was no big deal. I'd hardly call the slowdown at mile two "dangerous," as another runner did. Yes, we had to slow to a walk... but oh well! About mile six (if I recall), some were even stopped by a train! It's not something controllable, so chuckle about it and run on! The finish line was awesome. I appreciate a race where they keep spectators out of the food area as that is one of my BIGGEST pet peeves. If I have just run 26.2 miles, I don't have to fight someone's eight year-old for the last donut! In SLC a woman actually walked up and handed the last two cartons of milk to her children - with me, just having finished a marathon, standing there just gaping! Feed your children at home! It's also hard enough to get through a bunch of runners, but to have to dodge children after a marathon can be painful! The rose, the tree, and the pin were GREAT touches. I actually really like the shirt... since it is a PNW race and we do get chilly and wet winters, it'll be a GREAT shirt for November runs; perhaps I'll wear it in the Seattle Marathon! I think my only minor complaint would be that the people who took the pictures did not "find" a single picture of me. A friend had to search for them. Also the finish-line photo didn't show up. What a bummer! But that was VERY minor! Overall this was a GREAT race! If I were going to do a repeat, I'd definitely do Portland again.
5.0

By: Sarah M.

Posted: October 13, 2006

maybe the second best marathon in the country

Very well organized, but lonely at times. Big hill around mile 16.
4.0

By: Somer T.

Posted: October 12, 2006

Super marathon in a fantastic city!

This is the second time I have done the Portland Marathon. I was again impressed with the organization and the awesome crowd support. It is a bit crazy at the start and hard to get out fast... but if you are looking for a FUN marathon, this is a must-do. Everything is well run... from the expo which starts on Friday to the great food after the run! I had a great time... and will come back in the future.
5.0

By: Sara C.

Posted: October 09, 2006

Fun first-time marathon; great for walkers

They ran out of shirts.... How does that happen? They had my money; all they had to do was order it. If people registered late, then they should have been the ones to wait for a shirt, not the people who registered before the deadline. Many miles of ugliness going through industrial area. Why not send runners through Laurelhurst or something? Maybe logistics for closing the roads. They need more porta-potties at the beginning. This was my first marathon, and I walked with a friend who was also a first-timer. She needed to pee at mile 5 and we lost a good 15 minutes waiting in line only to find a couple miles up the road there were lots of potties and NO lines. Otherwise a good experience.
4.0

By: Eddie Hahn

Posted: October 09, 2006

Awesome Marathon Event; Improve Pasta Dinner

Portland's previous denotation by The Ultimate Guide to Marathons as being the best organized marathon in North America is well deserved. That being said, previous comments notwithstanding, I would concentrate the room for improvement in (one) area: the pasta feed. Despite the pre-race brochure indicating pasta dinner tickets could be purchased at the expo, there were no tickets being sold there. (I walked the length of the expo twice and asked three different volunteers, and no one knew about it). Finally I asked the information booth (Saturday) who told me it was "sold out." Since the address/location was listed and I knew the Oregon Sports History Museum, I went there anyway. To the marathon's credit, they allowed me in, and even accepted my credit card, despite the fact it was set up for cash only. The food fare was fine, and beverages ample, and I thought my $20 was well spent when I was told I could get a second plate... until more and more runners showed up. The building was too small and overbooked. A marathoner I was dining with was turned away from even taking a water to go! Recommendation: reserve a larger area. As nice, pleasant and aesthetic a setting as the sports museum is, it was too small a location, especially for a 35th anniversary event. Outside of that the event is impeccable. Well marked splits with huge balloons every mile. Two varieties of energy drink and water about every two miles, and even a Red Bull sports drink station. Entertainment: Blue grass, Christian rock, harps, blues, bells, banjos, high school bands, and more. Out of the 70 marathons I have run, I can't remember one with quite as much musical variety along the course. The food at the end of the marathon also ranks up there with the most in quantity and best in quality of most major marathons. The course is a little "dry" and boring just before the St. John's Bridge, but that couldn't be avoided without eliminating it from the course, something I am sure nobody wants. The view from the top of that bridge affords the most beautiful view of the city along the whole route. I am not sure why there are so many negative comments about the all-weather, mock-turtle, long-sleeve shirt. I find the material very pleasant and comfortable; and to have a choice of colors (green or white) was a nice perk. As for the medal, they kept it within the tradition of the marathon's history. Who could ask for more?
5.0

By: Lucky P.

Posted: October 09, 2006

Worth the trip

Portland is a fun town with much to offer. Wished I could have stayed longer. Easy to get around by streetcar. The farmers market on Saturday with all its flowers and organic foods was awesome. Visited MT. Hood and Timberline lodge. That was just awesome. Now for the race: Pros - Good organization, solid water stops, medal and shirt were average but OK. Post-race food was better than most. Good crowd support. St. John's Bridge hill climb was something followed by a steady grade climb that doesn't show in the elevation chart well. Cons - Construction at mile two slowed the race to a walking event for a few minutes due to the bottleneck of runners, and I mean a slow walk. Mile markers weren't always easy to see with a balloon. Some signs didn't have a balloon and they were behind water tables or attached to a fence. Can't understand why race organizers can't put them up above street level. Still don't like water from a garden hose and fire hydrant. Drinking water from a fire hydrant with a garden hose attached or dipping water from garbage cans is not healthy. Go get a water sponsor. Thanks Portland. Good job and we'll be back.
4.0

By: Tracey H.

Posted: October 08, 2006

My home-town favorite

I have run the Portland Marathon twice. The community support is great and the aid stations many. Not nearly the wait at porta-potties I have dealt with in other races. The course is challenging, with a couple of big hills, but opera at the finish line and the roses get me every time. Oh, and this year the weather was perfect - 65 degrees, sunny, with a light breeze! It's my favorite race, and I am not just saying that because I am local.
5.0

By: Mark Hollingsworth

Posted: October 08, 2006

Great time, well organized, fairly flat, I like it

This is my second Portland and sixth marathon since I started running just over two years ago. I got my best time this year of any. Weather was perfect, not too hot. I didn't mind the hills, the first was early enough I didn't care too much, the second I ran about 1/3 and just fast walked the rest (passing some people running). After that it is mostly flat or downhill. Of course, those one-foot elevation gains in the last two miles *seem* like a big hill! The course isn't as scenic as the Discovery Marathon, but I enjoyed all but the industrial area. Even that was ok. The residential area past St. John's Bridge was quite nice. I enjoyed all the spectators and never had any problems with routes or knowing where to go, etc. The only tight place was near the beginning on "Marathon Avenue." But it was only for a very short time so it didn't bother me. Good food at the end, although they ran out of ice cream not long after me (hope they got some more in). I like the shirt. Too crowded for the porta-potties at the beginning and most of them on the route, but I'm not sure what they can do about that. I suppose more get pretty expensive and maybe even hard to get that many. I saw a lot of people just bailing out on the side of the course rather than wait in line. Just to put it into perspective, I ran it in 4:52 and I'm 50. Not one of the fast guys. My goal is always to have a good time, finish and feel good at the end. Overall, lots of fun, the fastest course I've run and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it.
5.0

By: Joe Ely

Posted: October 06, 2006

Great race, once it started

I really enjoyed this race, after the start, which was the only negative. Disorganization on the bag drop and no pace markers to line up with was a problem. However, the rest went well. I thought the course was easy. Only one big hill to deal with, and even for a flat-lander from Indiana like me, it was not a problem. Aid stations were plentiful and cheerful. Some of the gripes here about the course I think are unwarranted. To lay out 26.2 miles in a city will take you through a variety of neighborhoods. I think the organizers did and continue to do a good job. And the fans!! They were great. What fun... they had fun and the runners had fun - it was a great atmosphere. I enjoyed the race, PRed by 8+ minutes and had a great time. I'd run it again if I had occasion to be in Portland around race day.
4.0

By: Judy E.

Posted: October 06, 2006

Spectator support was wonderful!!!

This was my second marathon, with the first being much smaller. I didn't leave any warmups at the start, a blessing. That was a jam-up! And after the congestion just past the start(2 miles?), I figured I could not make the time I wanted. When I reached the damn hill onto St. John's Bridge, I KNEW I couldn't! But the spectators and the entertainment were outstanding, and the cheers for me by name (on my bib) did make a difference, even when I didn't have the energy to acknowlege them. I never realized how the encouragement of strangers could boost my spirits! I will admit that the seven-mile long out-and-back was demoralizing, but better on the coming back part. Red Bull actually calmed my nausea at the 20-mile point, though the honey stuff had made it worse, along with the gummy bears. Live (run) and learn! GU stations with water next time? That helped in the other marathon I ran. The water/sports drink stations to the end (why one within one mile or less of the finish?!) were appreciated, and not available at the other marathon.
4.0

By: R. O.

Posted: October 06, 2006

The spectators are world-class.

Negatives: The hill leading up to the St. John's Bridge is challenging. Not really a negative, just part of the course. Also, I understand the reason for taking the course through the industrial section of town (makes it flatter), but it isn't my favorite part. More porta-potties at the starting line, please. Also, the gear dropoff line was too long; I ended up stashing my stuff and finding it later. Positives: The course more than makes up for it on the east side of the river. The sweeping views were stunning. Although I don't run marathons to be cheered on, there were spectators on every part of the route where they were allowed to be, something I haven't seen in most marathons. And they were very supportive. I'd be lying if I said it didn't help push me, especially in the last miles. The volunteers are also world-class. Always helpful, always cheerful and supportive - every last one I came into contact with. The aid stations were all fully stocked and helpful at the time I came through them.
4.0

By: Edward M.

Posted: October 03, 2006

I had a great time running in Portland.

The Cons: -- Long stretches of the course are a bit dreary. -- The medal is somewhat chintzy. -- The shirt is ridiculously poorly made. The Pros: -- The parts of the course that aren't dreary are fantastic. The course is about 85% flat, with one hill that will bust your buttons. -- The people of Portland are great. The volunteers were incredibly enthusiastic. The water stops were always completely stocked with various drinks. -- They say it never rains on the Portland Marathon, and they were right in 2006. What a beautiful day. I'd run it again.
5.0

By: Tony C.

Posted: October 03, 2006

Nice race but tough course

Positives: Race was very well organized, especially at the aid stations, finish line and food areas. The volunteers are phenomenal. Beautiful medal and a nice shirt that I'm proud to wear. Negatives: Bottleneck at Mile 2 may be due to construction. Tough inclines Miles 3-5 and 15-17. Very congested family reunion area.
4.0

By: Julie E.

Posted: October 03, 2006

No Finisher Shirts :(

The spectators were fantastic!! Unfortunately, there were no finisher shirts left when several of us crossed the finish line. Although shirts will be sent to us at a later date, this was extremely disappointing.
4.0

By: Lori M.

Posted: October 02, 2006

Now THAT was fun!!!!

In a nutshell, Portland, OR knows how to throw a marathon. Spectators were almost EVERYWHERE along the course shouting personalized words of encouragement, every mile marker was identified by a HUGE blue balloon floating high in the air, split times were called at every mile, every aid station was identified by a HUGE red balloon floating high in the air, and there was even entertainment along the way. I thought the course was fine. Of course, this was my first time visiting Portland so I don't know how they could have altered the course to show a "better" side of Portland. The finish line was well stocked for us back-of-the-pack runners. My only complaint being the Dixie cup of water just didn't cut it. I REALLY needed a bottled water. I'll do this one again for sure.
5.0

By: Ted G.

Posted: October 02, 2006

good race

This was my 5th Portland Marathon. The health expo was great. I think there were fewer vendors this year so it was easier to move around. As for race day, I thought this was supposed to be "the best organized race"? This was the 35th year so you would think these little things would be figured out by now. The placement of the porta-potties at the start was awful. The lines for the porta-potties were in the same space as the staging for the race. What a mess. The gear drop was a cruel joke. Please don't make me stand in line for 20 minutes just to drop my gear bag! They really need corrals or something at the start. There were a lot of people in blue jeans and jackets (and dogs and strollers) in the staging area before the start. It is crowded enough with just the runners. My last itty-bitty complaint: the finisher's shirt looks like a top to your jammies. The race itself was great. Nice course (I hate that hill!), plenty of aid stations, good crowds after you cross the bridge, and great food at the end. I'm sure that ice cream sandwich saved my life.
4.0

By: Douglas S.

Posted: September 20, 2006

Great organization. Course should be better.

I live in Portland and have done this race every year since I moved here in 1995. The organization is fantastic. Lots of attention to details... even giving out Douglas Fir saplings and a rose to all finishers. My only gripe is the course could be way better. It's almost like the organizers don't want people to like it so they don't move here! Why not go through some of the cool neighborhoods or up Leif Erickson trail? This is a great running city. It's a shame we don't show it off.
4.0

By: Dora Melgar_Baldwin

Posted: August 05, 2006

As an Andean girl, running is my favorite sport.

2002 Portland Marathon: It was excellent for me. The weather was just right. Next time I will work in my downhill training. I hope I can do it again!!!!! - Dora :)
4.0

By: C. Billhartz

Posted: December 08, 2005

Lots of fun, great spectator support

This was my fourth marathon and because of a bad case of plantar fasciitis, I came into it way undertrained (total of about 20 miles running in last 5 weeks of training) so I didn't know if I'd even finish. (Only decided to go ahead and run it the week before.) I approached it with the attitude that I'd just go out and have fun; and have fun I did. I met a super nice woman named Sally from Seattle (Hi, Sally!) at about mile 4 and she and I ran together until about mile 17. BTW: That ramp up to that gorgeous green bridge is enormous!!!! The weather was perfect, the course was flat, as advertised, and I thought the scenery was fine and find it strange that people complain about scenery at all. Every city has its pretty parts and its ugly parts and it's kind of neat to see both. I didn't have any problems at water stops. I felt better than expected for most of the race, then hit the wall like never before at about mile 20, and from there on in it was run/walk run/walk. I could only smile and shake my head at about mile 25.7 when a spectator who saw me struggling yelled at me personally (thanks to our names on bibs) to keep running. It might have seemed easy to her, but I was a hurtin'. I appreciated her concern though. I finished in 4:24 and one of those medical guys looked in my eyes and almost pulled me off to the side for some aid because I was so wasted. But then I ate two ice cream bars and felt better almost immediately. So my favorite part was definitely the ice cream bars. And that little tree sprig they gave us. My only complaint is the loooong line to get t-shirts at the finish line. Apparently the runners didn't realize they could form four lines for the four different sizes and were all lining up in one line in front of the small booth. I would definitely consider doing this marathon again, non-injured and better trained.
4.0

By: Jennifer V.

Posted: November 13, 2005

Portland has more to offer

Very disappointed with the course. I felt the course was through industrial Portland. However, Portland has much more to offer for a much more scenic course. Organization was fantastic. Great water/food stops.
4.0

By: Grace Y.

Posted: October 26, 2005

Fantastic crowd support and volunteers!

This was my first marathon and my overall experience was a good one. Spectator and Volunteers: The crowd support was excellent! I finished at 5:12 and there was great spectator support all the way to the end. Having your name printed on the bib (optional) was a great idea! It helped tremendously. Also the volunteers at the packet pickup and along the course were very friendly and helpful. I carried my own water bottle. The volunteers were very helpful and fast in filling up my water bottle. Course: The course had some scenic parts, much of the race was through the industrial park (6-11). The course was confusing and dangerous at Mile 1-2 b/c there was a fence that divided the course for a short stretch. During this short stretch, the options were to run through mud puddles or run along railroad tracks, both were not very good options. Hairpin turn at mile 10 could be dangerous with a big pack of people. Luckily, I had a lot of space when I turned. From Mile 14-16, I felt we were running too close to the oncoming traffic. The mile markers were confusing. I was timing myself and wasn't sure if the mile marker was the sign, the brick, the spray-painted marker on the ground or where the person actually called out the time. They were all a bit off from each other. Recovery Area and T-shirt: There was plenty of food! Better if we had a small bag to take some food with us and bottled water instead water in Dixie cups. Great t-shirt material (Dri-Fit); the sizes were like cotton shirt sizes though. My small fits like an extra large. Overall: The course overall was flat and partly scenic. The temperature was perfect for running. The music was great! The local crowd support was awesome!
4.0

By: Jeff G.

Posted: October 23, 2005

Outstanding race, mediocre course

I have read many of the comments from other runners from this year and think they are really a bunch of fairweather treadmill runners wanting everything to be perfect. If you opened your eyes, it was a beautiful course and you really did see what Portland was all about from the current day business district to the historic section and the industrial section. The weather was perfect, the spectators were awesome, and the drum line during the first mile carried me for miles. The only two criticisms I have is, first, the first turn that went through the construction area. I was in the front with the 7-minute milers and it was bad enough with few of us in the bottleneck, large puddles, chainlink fencing and potholes. Even at the time I was thinking about the poor souls who would be crowded and pushed through a few minutes behind us. At the VERY LEAST they could have graded the segment and put down some packed gravel. Not only uncomfortable for the start of a marathon, but extremely dangerous, even for those of us used to running trails and industrial areas in the dark. The course director deserves to be forced to run this section in the dark every day until next year. Only a small second critique was the pace runners for the second half of the race: Make sure they talk up the race and the course and at least talk during with the group they are leading. I was in the 3:20 pace group and the pacer for the second half of the race didn't say squat for the last 13 miles and frequently dropped back to talk with one of the other pacers, leaving us to wonder if we really had a pacer.
4.0

By: Mark Hollingsworth

Posted: October 22, 2005

Great run, excellent organization, great fans.

This was my fourth marathon in a year of running. (Royal Victoria, North Olympic Discovery - Port Angeles, Seafair - Seattle). This was the largest by far of anything I've run, although I was at the Nike 26.2 in San Fransico last year when my sweetie ran it. The start was a bit crowded, but didn't bother me too much. I would have liked more room but didn't expect much different. The aid stations were great, I had no problems getting to them like someone mentioned, not sure what he meant.... I quite liked the music, I used to play a lot of big band (now I do small group) but I didn't get to hear very much! The industrial area was not the best scenery, but it was flat so I can live with it. The hill at 16 was right were I normally poop out for a bit, but this time I went through that a bit earlier and was feeling pretty good by then. I ran up about 1/2 then walked fast the rest (passing some runners). No complaints about the rest of the course, although I was a bit tired the last 2 miles! I was glad of the downhill later, didn't bother my legs at all, although some don't like downhills much. The pacer was doing strange things, going fast and stopping at the mile markers, so I gave up and just kept my own pace - I still came in under the 5 hours I wanted. I'm no fast guy, so take these comments with that in mind. The food was great, I liked being able to eat with friends and family at the Discovery Marathon, but I can see where that wouldn't work very well with this many runners. The packet pickup and expo were run well; no complaints at all. Parking at the start was easy - only a couple of blocks away for $5. We also found a motel 10 mintues away for $49. The best scenery I've been on by far was the Discovery Marathon, and since this was in the city, I didn't expect much different than I saw. No complaints from me. This was my fastest marathon for me so far at 4:56, so the course couldn't have been TOO hard. Seafair was much harder, I thought. I liked the names on the bibs. It was fun to have people calling your name out and cheering, etc. Even though there were quite a number of people at the end, they managed to call each person's name out also. I would certainly recommend it to anyone - I had a great time.
5.0

By: Sarah M.

Posted: October 19, 2005

Awesome race, but hard on the quads!

I really enjoyed running this course--the weather was perfect and I thought the spectators were great. For those of you coming from non-hilly areas, however, get ready! I know that many people did not think the hill at Mile 17 was that bad, but I'm from Chicago, and it's nearly impossible to do any quality hill training there. I trudged my way up, and then at Mile 22 or 23, there is a steep one-mile downhill. That sounds great in theory, but in reality, I thought my legs were going to fall off. All of that said, because I trained hard, I did get a PR on this course, and I loved all of the beautiful Portland fall scenery. Oh--a minor complaint--what is up with the mock turtleneck finisher's shirt? They are really great shirts.... Except for the mock turtleneck, which lends it an early 90's feel.
5.0

By: Toby L.

Posted: October 18, 2005

Overall a good race

This was my third Portland Marathon. It was the first time I ran it for fun and not for time and I paid attention to some details I hadn't before. Overall, I am still pleased with my hometown marathon, but it could use a few tweaks, not major overhauls. As stated by others, the organization is generally top-notch and the volunteers are simply phenomenal. Having lived here for over 20 years, it is obvious that the organizers have decided to make the course as easy (flat) as a marathon course could be in Portland and have sacrificed the area's natural beauty; that can be a pro or a con, depending on your perspective. Running it for fun at over an hour slower than in prior years, it was definitely a con for me this year. However, I do not see the course changing. It is what it is. The medal is very nice and the finisher's shirt was the best yet. Here is what I would like to see improved (assuming that the Portland race organizers read this board, as several do). Please keep nutrition on the course simple and consistent and prominently display the info on your website and/or mailings well in advance. Please use drinks and carbs that are commonly available for purchase. It is important to be able to train using what will be on the course. For the carbs, please choose one and then place it more frequently (every 4-6 miles) on the course. The Honey Stinger was first available at mile 18 or so. If a runner (or walker) is going to bonk, carbs at 18 aren't likely to help. Carbs available at 6 and 12 as well as 18 (or more frequently) could help. Post-race: Please, please, please bring back the Haggen Daaz ice cream bars. I was so looking forward to that bar I had after 2003 & 2004 and got some generic brand instead. It was ok, but not the same. In general, the food seemed to be of lower quality than past years; still nice quantity and variety. And PLEASE put porta-potties in the recovery area. I left the recovery area sooner than I think I should have b/c I had a full bladder and I was told that the one that was in the medical tent was not available for general use.
4.0

By: Megan L.

Posted: October 16, 2005

Great overall, a few minor hitches

Despite the mediocre scenery, Portland is really a top-notch run. There are spectators and bands almost the whole way except the few miles before St. John's Bridge, there are ample water/Ultima tables, and the pace groups are visible, friendly, and for the most part accurate. Furthermore, this year most people had names on their bibs; it was great to hear people cheering me by name even though they didn't know me. I think this is one of the best ideas I've seen for encouraging fans to cheer. However, this year something went wrong at the start. We were packed in much more tightly than last year, so tightly I was worried the start wouldn't be safe. Furthermore, there was construction in the mile 1-2 area that narrowed the course significantly; I actually had to stop for several seconds and wait to get through. A lot of runners diverted off the course and onto the railway tracks, a move that wasn't very safe, but if they hadn't I don't know how long it would have taken for everybody to move through the area. I managed to make up for most of the lost time on the long downhill, but making up time isn't very desirable any time during a marathon. Otherwise the race was great. I ran by myself and I'll never forget all the spectators at the finish line who were cheering me by name. The finish has the potential to make or break a race, and this year, for Portland, it made it.
5.0

By: Kitty Davis

Posted: October 16, 2005

Tired - but it was AWESOME for my 1st marathon!

Well, what can I say - it was a great experience! I don't know why some people said the hill at mile 16-17 was no big deal - because I just about died when I saw it! Omigosh! The industrial area was a bit boring but it was cool to see the faster runners (by 4 miles) on the other side as they had turned back on the loop. The tracks & potholes were a little daunting - had to make sure my foot landed after the track so I wouldn't twist it - but no biggie. I really appreciated all of the aid stations; they were great. The volunteers were great & there was plenty for all. There was water/2 sports drinks which was nice. Also nice w/ the gummy bears, bananas, honey stinger, Hershey's Marathon bars, Red Bull, & whatever else I forgot. After I finished (mind you I could not jog at all the last 10 miles - hurt too bad) there were plenty of post-race snacks. I didn't find it a problem to take my snacks out of the area - so I was able to still snack while meeting up with my wonderful family. I thought the course entertainment lacked a little as a lot of the them weren't even playing/performing. I was all jazzed to see the little tents on the course only to come up to them and see them visiting, closing up shop or just taking a break. Canned music would have been nice. It was nice through the Univ. of Portland area to see that some homes had stero's blaring upbeat music -THAT kept me going/motivated. I plan on doing this one again!
5.0

By: Tiffany S.

Posted: October 16, 2005

Somewhat disappointing race

The expo and race start were easy to get to. The course is very unattractive - mostly industrial. However, the weather is cool and the leaves are changing. The music was not memorable. My major problems with this race were that the water stops were only on one side of the road. This forces runners on the opposite side of the road to cut others off while trying to access the water. The other complaint I have is that not every mile marker had someone calling out times. And many of the times that were called out were wrong! This was very aggravating towards the end. I have run the 'big' marathons and would not recommend this one unless you are doing one marathon in every state. Portland is a nice and relaxed city. Come to visit but don't run the race.
3.0

By: Jeff D.

Posted: October 15, 2005

Great first marathon experience!

This was my first marathon. Very well organized, and great fans. Strangers were calling out my name on the course. Very crowded at start, couldn't even get into the street at first, stuck on the sidewalk. Disappointed in the scenery.... Many miles in an industrial area where the street was torn up, or had lots of railroad tracks. Music was good, could have done without the Christian rock band which seemed louder than all the rest. Don't think the website accurately repesented the hills. Not many, but the St. John's Bridge hill (going up) is pretty steep and the hill going down toward the steel bridge around mile 23 was very hard on the knees. I could see that if your goal was time this could be a frustrating run with the crowd on the course and the potholes and puddles. I think this was a great marathon for a first-timer who just wanted to finish. T-shirts and medals were nice. Good food at finish, though it would have been nice if friends/family could be there. Had to meet them outside of the finish area. Signing up for pictures was confusing. I was not clear if I could have requested specific pictures to be taken. Purchasing pictures that are taken is VERY expensive. $80 entry should get you one pic at least.
4.0

By: Craig G.

Posted: October 14, 2005

Great mid-sized race, but not easy...

Prior to this marathon, I had run LA three times and San Diego (Carlsbad) once. This was a much better race. I thought the size of this race (about 7000) was perfect. Big enough, but not so big that it is chaos. The organization was very good at the expo, start, and finish. I had the luxury of finishing near the front, so I was alone in the finish chute and there was a great array of amenities there. The only downside was that I exited the chute to meet my family, and discovered there was no way to get back in to get water. I thought the course was plenty scenic, but I don't run races for the scenery. I was pleasantly surprised by the crowd support and the music. There was some bad footing and potholes on the early part of the course especially, so you really had to pay attention running in the dark. One big surprise was how hard the course was. I expected the hill at 17 miles, but it was tougher than I thought it would be. The bigger surprise was how hard other parts of the course were. The hills just before halfway were a big shock. The final 8 miles are rolling with one long decline, instead of flat with a decline like the map led me to believe. This is not a real fast course, which isn't a problem as long as you realize that going in.
4.0

By: Jamie L.

Posted: October 13, 2005

OK, but I've run more exciting races.

From the comments I read before running Portland and now after experiencing it, I think you will either love it or be somewhat disappointed. And I personally think it makes a big difference whether you are new to marathoning or not, and whether you are running for 'the experience' or for a 'fast time'. The course was ok. Couple dangerous spots where the railroad tracks, puddles and equipment at the side of the road caused a couple mis-steps for some runners. The 'industrial area' (and most of the course) is fine if you are running for time - mostly flat. Other than that it's not particularily scenic. The one major hill up to the bridge wasn't too bad. Race organization was excellent. Packet pickup/expo, start/finish were great, medal/shirt etc. nice. On-course music was good music and I am guessing is supposed to 'showcase' some local talent. The music however (as others have said) is folksy and not particularily motivating. I felt more like I should stop and listen rather than run faster. (lady playing a harp for instance) Spectators are interesting. Many do help encourage but many also just stand and watch silently. Kind of a surreal experience at times compared to other major races. Personally I think new marathoners and walkers would love this race. If you are trying for a fast time and atmosphere isn't a big deal it's also a good course to run on your own. If you are an average marathoner where time and atmosphere are equally important I think it might be disappointing.
4.0

By: Gavin Kentch

Posted: October 13, 2005

at least it's well organized

I'd say it's telling that the race touts itself as 'the best organized' marathon in North America -- not the biggest or the fastest or the most scenic, but the best organized. On that front, I'd say it comes through: This is an extremely well-organized race. Other than that, yes, the course is remarkably unattractive; if this is all you see of Portland, you won't be too impressed, and you shouldn't be. If you're coming in from out of town for the run, come a few days early, and go for your last easy runs in Forest Park. Or better yet, save your airfare for a truly attractive course -- the Mayor's Midnight Sun Marathon in Anchorage, say -- and come through Portland some other time to go for a run in some of the more scenic parts of the city. If you're looking for a reasonably fast and easy course, you could certainly do much worse than Portland. However, if you're looking for a course equal to the city it showcases, I'd have to recommend looking elsewhere.
4.0

By: Jennifer S.

Posted: October 12, 2005

Great course, the rest was overrated by others...

First let me qualify by saying that I had really high expectations b/c everybody (even the course website) said that this was the best organized race in the country; I think not. San Diego's rock n' roll marathon and the Seattle marathon beat the pants off of Portland in this arena. The start line was really crowded, so crowded that I think it stressed me out (not a good way to begin 26.2). A sharp turn and road narrowing at mile 1 forced runners to walk through the bottle-neck and the race was similarly crowded for the entire distance (at least in the 4hrs pace group). Post-race processing really sucked, again b/c of the crowds. Spectators were not able to access the finish, so there would be no hugging those who'd stood around all day in the cold to cheer you on as you crossed the line. There was also no place to sit and stretch and the people in the medical tent were without supplies so they couldn't do much other than rub your legs and give words of encouragement. There was only 1 water table post-race, and there would be no fighting backwards through the crowd if you thought you'd better hydrate more, even if you hadn't just run a marathon! Plus, though free food was plentiful, you couldn't take any of it with you - I really wanted to stretch, re-hydrate, and eat, but I also wanted to give my race supporters a great big 'thank you' and was rather disappointed that I had to choose between these 2 options. That said, aid stations on the course were frequent and spectators numerous, splits were called more often than I'd expected, and the course was so flat that even the 'hill' at mile 17 felt like nothing (of course, I ran Seattle the year prior and trained on hills). If you want to run the Portland marathon, please do, but run this one for the great weather and excellent course; forget any expectations you may have had about a post race party on site and just head to the local brewery for your celebrations.
4.0

By: Richard P.

Posted: October 12, 2005

Great race!!!

This is a great event. Top flight organization and the community really gets behind the whole event. Registration and packet pick-up is easy and the expo is well done. Weather was great and course support was first rate. I've seen alot of races (35) and this is one of the most solid running organizations I've seen. However, the race is advertised as fast and flat. This may be true if you are from the great Northwest, but to us flatlanders it had some tough climbs (especially at the bridge between miles 16 and 17) and the downhills are steep, quad killers.
4.0

By: Jake Zulewski

Posted: October 12, 2005

Well organized, loved the live music!

OK, the organization of this race lived up to the hype. Volunteers galore, easy race packet pick-up, and a fantastic starting and finish line. Also, the live music was both diverse and plentiful. It seemed like as soon as you were out of earshot from one band, you'd hear another one down the road. As for the course, the hills were not that bad and the scenery was less than spectacular at times, but for good reason. Perhaps there's a way to eliminate the out-and-back through the industrial area. Otherwise, a good marathon experience.
4.0

By: Mark Coughlin

Posted: October 11, 2005

Good outweighs the bad

I came to compete and try to run a fast time, so my comments reflect that perspective. This was my first trip to Portland. I'll start with positive thoughts because overall, I was happy. POSITIVE: Nice course. Yes, a few ugly spots, but I didn't mind them - not even the out-and-back stretch by the warehouses. Hey, it was pancake flat there, and I was trying to make time. Clearly, they were trying to limit the hills, which I appreciate. I liked the fact that you could see a lot of the field going the opposite way along that part. I truly enjoyed the music along the way. Not only was it plentiful, but it was very good! The crowd support was pretty good for a race of this size - especially toward the end. I enjoyed the scenery in the later miles, heading back toward downtown. Nice goodies and such after the finish. I enjoyed the free beer at the awards ceremony! The volunteers were very friendly and helpful. NEGATIVE: Most people would not worry about this, but it really bugged me. The mile marks are VERY inaccurate. I was running with two other experienced guys and we were clicking off a very steady pace, yet even on flat stretches, the mile splits were fluctuating as much as :28. Another tell-tale sign was that the 13-mile mark was only about 30-40 meters from the halfway mat. It should have been 1/10th of a mile or about 160 meters away! There is really no excuse for that kind of sloppiness and it makes you question the overall accuracy of the course. The hills were a significant, but acceptable, factor. The second, really big hill leading up to and over the bridge, was tougher than expected. Still, it would be hard to come up with an easier course in a hilly town like Portland. I knew this would not be a Chicago-flat course. The aid stations were a little confusing. It was hard to tell whether you were getting water or 'Glucose' - the cups looked the same - and at one point I dumped a cup of 'Glucose' on my head, thinking it was water and my eyes burned for several minutes. Personally, I prefer more standard brands of sports drink (Gatorade, PowerAde), since it is hard to know how these obscure ones will work for you. There should be some bottled water at the finish, and not just little cups. MY VERDICT: A nice marathon, good course, medium-fast, nice people, great city, generally well organized, with a few small problems. I'm glad I experienced it and may come back some day.
4.0

By: Erick F.

Posted: October 11, 2005

A little overrated

This was my third marathon (also third in three months - Seafair, SF) so I'm starting to get an idea of what expectations should be. Organization and support were nearly flawless. The only significant gaffe was the lack of room at the start. At the gun, there were a number of spectators deep within the field. The course was poor at best, with tons of potholes and many other hazzards including large puddles and train tracks where there wasn't enough room for the entire field on the paved surface. The local support was great. Not so sure I need to see those belly dancers, but the worship band was a great surprise. Those good Samaritans with the beer station were truly a blessing. They could stand to run this event in September when it not as likely to be as cold/damp. The medal is good bling - nice commemoration of Lewis and Clark (and Sacagawea). Not so sure I would run this one again.
4.0

By: Bryan C.

Posted: October 11, 2005

Nothing to Compare To

This was my first marathon, so it suffers from a lack of comparison. My overall impression is that this is a very well organized marathon, with plenty of aid stations along the way to keep you adequately hydrated. I felt that the course was a little boring from an aesthetic standpoint, but I was more focused on getting through the race than I was looking at the pretty scenery (or lack thereof). People were friendly and encouraging and the after-race area had tons of food and liquids. The t-shirt and medal were top-notch. I would recommend this marathon to anyone.
4.0

By: Meghan M.

Posted: October 10, 2005

More hilly than expected and not as scenic either.

Let me start with what was good. The race is very well organized and the after-race welcoming crew is great.... Lots of food and a neat giveaways (i.e. roses, little evergreen trees, great food items, and a super cool 'finisher' long-sleeve singlet). I really expected the marathon to showcase more of Portland. I felt the scenery was pretty in parts but a lot of it was overlooking warehouses and industrial parks and it definitely was not as pretty as I expected. This was my first trip to Portland and I was really hoping to see the beautiful part of Portland that everyone speaks so highly of. There were a couple down-and-back parts with some hairpin turns, which can get a bit boring on a 26-mile run. Also, according to the grade map on the website, the course appears to have only two very doable hills on the course. The course felt like it was a lot more uphill and the downhill parts were pretty steep grades that were very hard on the knees. This wouldn't be a course I would recommend to run for a PR or as a qualifier. If you don't have to travel far, then it might be worth it, but it has been the least favorite of the eight others I have done.
3.0

By: Hazel Chase

Posted: October 10, 2005

Friendly, well-organized, SO FUN!

Portland Marathon really takes care of its runners. Great course and lots of water, gel, sports drink along the way. I liked the gummy bears and some Snickers Marathon bars. We felt so special and important in this marathon. Definitely a great and wonderful experience! I hope all marathons have this kind of support and energy.
5.0

By: Tom O'Brien

Posted: October 10, 2005

memorable first marathon

Swept up in the sea of humanity facing the limits of their bodies and ninds nurtured by the volunteers, musicians, and spectators who urge you along in your challenge.
5.0

By: Cynthia W.

Posted: October 10, 2005

Most fun, best org'd, nicest people, great course

Thanks to all of you wonderful volunteers and Race Committee. This is a great, fun, happy race. The descents come just when they're needed, and the views are great.
5.0

By: Beth D.

Posted: October 10, 2005

Improve the food and it's a winner

Finished the 2005 race yesterday. Very well organized, fans were fantastic. I didn't even mind the 'non-scenic' parts of the course. Weather perfect. HOWEVER, the biggest gaffe was the food. Please, please, please provide runners with real food earlier in the race. I think the first banana I saw was at mile 18 or 20, something like that. Your choices prior to that included an obscure bar that probably almost no one trained with. Bad time to be experimenting. Plus, not everyone can choke down bars, and chewy candy like gummy bears. I need something easily digestible that goes down with minimal chewing effort. I bet a lot of others feel likewise. The other issue was beverage choices. The 'glucose' beverage was not offered frequently enough. As such, it was difficult for runners to get liquid calories in unless they brought their own. Please offer a calorie-replacement drink (with electrolytes) at EVERY water station. Otherwise, a great race!!
4.0

By: Dylan N.

Posted: June 26, 2005

Great organization, good music, ugly-ish course

I grew up in Portland and live nearby, so I ran the PDX Marathon as my first marathon in 2004. I agree with previous comments that the course has ugly spots and has a good 8 miles in industrial areas, but I think the reason is that Portland is quite hilly and that's about the only flat spot in town. Picking up the packet pre-race was a snap and the after-race goodies were great. There was a lot of different entertainment during the race and it was great to hear the drums at the first .25 mile. One of the private homes we ran by was playing the theme from Rocky over and over and I (with probably 500 other people) yelled 'Adrian, Adrian' while passing it. I'm kind of perplexed at the number of people complaining about the lack support by spectators. Personally, I don't see why not having a cheering crowd every step of the way is a problem. I guess that I kind of zone out while running and do it for the accomplishment more than for the cheering. All in all, a fun time.
4.0

By: Dave H.

Posted: April 30, 2005

Not the greatest, but not the worst

Having done Portland 9 times (I live here!), I can confirm the following for those considering this marathon: Course: poor scenery but relatively fast. Large sections are in industrial areas that are ugly and boring. Traffic control is the main reason for this selection of routes. Few of the beautiful areas of Portland on included in the course. Most of the course is reasonably flat. One big hill and one moderate one. The rest are minimal. Most of the miles are very flat and truly fast. Organization terrific. It is well known for this, so this makes it a good run for first-timers who need and appreciate the easy logistics. Spectators are few and very quiet. I have never seen such a lack of support and enthusiasm in any of the other marathons I've done. Not sure why this is... Post-race goodies and finisher's shirt are great. For what it is worth, this event has a very high proportion of female runners and also a very high proportion of runners achieving a PR. Amazing but true: despite the wet climate, this race has rarely had any rain at all. Usually it is cool and cloudy or sometimes sun breaking out during the mid-morning. Also, the norm is no wind. The organizers have touted their incredible good fortune on the weather front. Overall, worth trying for many runners, particularly rookies, PR seekers, and those in search of a BQ time who want an easy course, high probability of excellent running weather, and no glitches. But for veterans seeking new and interesting events, this may not be the one for you.
3.0

By: Gerald Rivas

Posted: February 23, 2005

This is a mediocre race.

The organization, the course and the scenery are at best average. It took them four and a half months to send me my finisher's certificate, and it is the cheapest looking piece of paper of all of the races I have participated in. Never again. Do yourself a favor and stay away from this overhyped turkey!!!
2.0

By: Trudell E.

Posted: October 28, 2004

Fabulous experience in Portland!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This was my second marathon, first in Portland. I appreciated the course which was scenic, except for the industrial area. KUDOS to the many volunteers, water stations, spectators, etc. At the finish line the warm welcome and food were much needed and appreciated. Thanks again; I'll participate in Portland's Marathon again after I've participated in other marathons across the US.
5.0

By: Lisa B.

Posted: October 27, 2004

Where was the GU at mile 9?

It was a well organized marathon with a lot of energy from the 7,000 runners that were out there, but the health of the runners should be the most important thing, and not providing Gu (the honey stinger was crap) until mile 18.5 was not in the best interest of the runners (and then not providing water with it for another mile was not in good judgment). I did have fun and would end up bringing my own fuel belt the next time.
4.0

By: WWU Sputnik

Posted: October 26, 2004

A- Grade Marathon

The marathon has decent organization without any major setbacks but the course scenery could be improved. I have no complaints about the organization of the marathon but the on-course supplements weren't the best. The sports drink that was provided wasn't sugary enough and gel was only provided at mile 18-19. Most people burn off their supplies after about 90 minutes of running and taking gel at miles 8-12 (as well as the gel provided later) is a good idea. Carrying your own gel could help. Can't go wrong with more energy. I didn't take points off for this because not many marathons provide gel in the first half. Industrial part of town seemed boring and long(~6-11 miles). The gap between the person ahead and the person behind me left an awkward feeling of running alone. At about mile 9 you turn around and the boredom of running back through the same boring place is compensated by the fact that you get cheered by the slower runners that are running towards you. Oregon is a beautiful state but Portland isn't the most urban city in America. Industrial parts are ok since you only run through in the beginning. The start and finish are still in the nicest part of the city. A few notes: If you want your pictures taken during the race you need to sign up at the Expo. I almost missed that. Signing up doesn't require you to purchase something. It is possible to admire yourself online for free later. Portland also has a lot of decent sports stores. One of them(forgot name) is within the walking distance of the Race headquarters (Hilton) and has a lot of information about Oregon's best athletes. An entire section is dedicated to Steve Prefontaine and is very inspiring. It is worth a visit. Overall the race is a great, Worth a trip to beautiful Oregon.
4.0

By: AJ H.

Posted: October 21, 2004

blah, I've seen better

This was only my second marathon, and maybe I had my hopes up a little too much, but I was disappointed with the Portland Marathon. I thought that the course would be scenic, but rather, I mostly remember the industrial areas. It was nice that the marathon had bands along the course, but much of the music was slow, folksy, and had little beat. This is fine when I am relaxing at home, but when I am pounding the pavement with my feet, I need something that gets me and keeps me motivated. Probably the biggest disappointment was the crowd. The places where people cheered ALL the runners on were few and far between. At the previous marathon I ran, people were lined on the streets for more than half the course cheering for everyone and anyone. That is very motivational for a runner. The crowds in Portland mostly just stood around and watched without any encouragement. I was befuddled by this. The best part of the Portland Marathon was the finish area. I had never seen so much food. I was starving and the food was AWESOME. Also, the T-Shirt, sapling, rose, pin, and everything else received after the race was a great gesture. I probably won't be running Portland again, but we'll see how it stacks up against future races. However, I know there are better races out there.
2.0

By: Cherie Harrington

Posted: October 16, 2004

Fun, fabulous time! Very glad I did it for my 1st!

Thank you so much for a wonderful experience. Everyone has shared that Portland is a good 1st. I made so many friends, used the water stations (no Ultima), found 3 porta potties in good use, loved the post race food and rubbing elbows with the others. I think every food there was sampled by me--no ice cream although I did a frozen fruit bar! The shirt, medal, pin, rose, seedling, and pictures are all perfect for my memories. Thank you again for a great memorable run!
5.0

By: Markham B. M.

Posted: October 13, 2004

Great Experience in Portland!!

I can't say enough good things about the Portland Marathon. This was my first visit to Portland! It was a very organized race with lots of support. The music on the course was outstanding and really varied. Some may not like the industrial portions of the course but the bridges and beautiful neighborhoods made up for it. The finisher shirt was the best as well as the beautiful medal. I also thought the seedling was a very special touch. I highly recommend this marathon. For the most part the course is flat and fast. Thanks to the many volunteers that made it a special experience!
5.0

By: EYvonne C.

Posted: October 12, 2004

One of the Best I have Run!

I enjoyed the marathon very much. Great organization, nice course, good weather, with tons of spectators and aid stations. Yes, there are some hills, but nothing compared to St. George, Utah! There were many bands and other entertainment throughout to distract you. The entire city knows about the marathon. I have run a few marathons where no one in town actually knew there was a marathon happening that weekend. Everyone in the area was very friendly and courteous to us. I only have 2 negative comments, and they are very minor. We went to the pasta dinner the night before wanting to swap t-shirts as was advertised. No t-shirt swap took place this year and no one knew why?? Also the Ultima! UGH! I realize some people like it and I see the ads for it in the running magazines, but it tastes horrible! I vote for Gatorade or Powerade! Everything else was first class and I highly recommend the marathon to anyone, first timers and folks looking for a PR.
4.0

By: steve s.

Posted: October 11, 2004

wonderful event

I found the course very reasonable in terms of elevation gain and loss. The aid stations were well stocked with enthusiastic volunteers, eager to help and cheer you on. The crowd support was wonderful with few gaps in their numbers. Overall it was a wonderful experience and will be one I will do again.
5.0

By: Steve R.

Posted: October 10, 2004

Need to fix start and remove industrial section

Great city, but marathon course needs to be rerouted to more scenic areas. Too much in industrial sections - start and first mile too crowded. Little food for slow participants. Great fans in non-industrial area.
2.0

By: Spencer Albin

Posted: October 08, 2004

2nd Marathon, 1st Portland

Good aid stations, lots of volunteers. Thought the start area was a little congested, had to dodge runners that were already fading in the first mile. Although I probably went out too fast. Website overview of course was very helpful. The flat industrial area was nice but boring view. Will probably come back, but not next year, try some other race.
4.0

By: Karen Abrams

Posted: October 07, 2004

First Time - Fabulous!

I ran the marathon on October 3rd. It was my first marathon. The course was well marked and the entertainment was very well planned and executed. My only concern was that it is promoted as a fast, downhill race. I found the first half to have a lot of small hills which are not mentioned. The last half was indeed mostly downhill after mile 17. Also, everyone with GPS watches should get their satellite fix the night before because due to the large downtown buildings, nobody could get a fix until .25 miles post start. The medal, shirt and food at the end were fantastic as were the medics that treated my blisters. Overall a great marathon and I cannot wait to run it again in 2005.
5.0

By: Antoni H.

Posted: October 06, 2004

OK course, great event.

The course is OK. The industrial section does get a little old. The out and back section where you get a glimpse of the elite runners and the entertainment helps. The hills are not much to speak off. I guess I am just used to running bigger and steeper hills in my every day runs. As for oranization, I thought it was great. You get up to your pace quickly as the runners are segregated by pace. There was only one water stop where I had to wait briefly for some Ultima; the rest were very well stocked. The finish area is small, but I never felt crowded. My only problem was with how they handled checked in clothing. Fan support in the neighborhoods was great. Keep an eye out for the guys handing out beer between miles 24 and 25. And the scattered entertainment helped keep you occupied. I have done quite a few half marathons and this by far was the best organized event I have run.
4.0

By: Sandy S.

Posted: October 06, 2004

Great Run

Portland is a small city that really embraces this annual event. There is a great buzz around the city that adds to the pre-race hype. The expo was very organized and the volunteers were extremely helpful. The course was decent and the support along the course was more enthusiatic than anticipated. The residential area during Mile 12, and the University of Portland (near Mile 21) are very special to run through. My advice is not too underestimate the bridge on Mile 17... it's a massive climb, so be prepared! The finish is fabulous. I wish more of the course ran through downtown and less through the industrial areas. Hagen Daaz and Red Bull at the end amongst other goodies. All in all, a great run and weekend.
3.0

By: Daniel J.

Posted: October 05, 2004

Great course, beautiful city

I think I've found a new favorite marathon. The city is gorgeous, the weather was perfect, and the course has a minimum of challenging hills. The enthusiastic spectators were endless and the volunteers were all very helpful and friendly. The aid stations were plentiful and well stocked. However, I can't say I like the taste of the Ultima flavors. There were lots of choices for post-race snacks and everything was well-laid out. They even give you a pine tree to plant. The medal was excellent as well. This is a must-do marathon!
5.0

By: Don B.

Posted: October 05, 2004

Good Event... but get rid of Ultima

This is the second time I have run the Portland Marathon, the first being in 2002, and I do think it is one of the best organized that I have done (33 in all). The course is actually very runner friendly, with some good uphills, downhills and flats...the industrial area is not at all as bad as some of the comments make it out to be, since you can occupy your time watching the other runners. The start and finish areas were fine, and we got plenty of food afterwards. The use of a loop course also makes this a very pleasant event, with no shuttle bus ride and no need to awake at 4:00 am. The crowd support was fairly large and spread out over the whole course, especially in the city itself. One major complaint, however, is the use of Ultima as the 'sports drink.' Ultima is very poor, both in taste and its ability to serve as a replenishment drink. Basically, it is awful, and I can't see why some marathons continue to use it unless they are getting some tremendous break in the price. Switching from the advertised sports drink to Ultima about six weeks before the event was a mistake.
4.0

By: Patricia B.

Posted: October 05, 2004

Fun marathon, great spectators and bands.

The weather cooperated for this year's Portland Marathon. High fog cover and cool breezes kept things from getting too warm up until the final 5-6 miles. Great volunteer support. The bands were a welcome distraction, especially along miles 7-11. I would do this marathon a 3rd time.
5.0

By: jon g.

Posted: October 04, 2004

Excellent back-of-the-pack support

50+ previous marathons | 2 Portland Marathons Even for 5-hour back-of-the-packers, the frequent aid stations were still well-supplied with all the Ultima we needed and plentiful supplies at the occasional Marathon Bar, Honey Stinger gels, gummy bears, etc. stations. The abundant supplies of oranges, bananas, grapes, apples, bagels, potato chips, cookies, ice cream and PowerAde at the finish made it hard to believe 4,000 other runners in the marathon and thousands of others in the half marathon had already finished and had their fills! The heavy duty dark blue or white (finisher's choice) cotton long sleeve t-shirt with Portland Marathon emblazoned on front and back were a welcome contrast another PNW city marathon to the north's annual November marathon with 45 sponsors' logos on back and not a single mention of the name/place of the race on the back and only a small logo on the front under the main sponsor's name. For my second attempt at the course this year, I made it a point to run up all the hills at the beginning and the big mile 17 hill up to St. John's Bridge and then up into the residential neighborhoods on the bluff after the bridge (though 'running' hills at that point was actually 13 - 14 minute miles but seeming to pass hundreds of other participants reduced to walking as I had done in the previous year). With the merciful downills to the finish from mile 22 up on the bluff, it's hard to believe the Portland Marathon could be characterized by some as 'flat,' 'relatively flat,' etc. Compared to Portland, the otherwise hilly Seattle Marathon with similar 1/2 mile long hills at miles 20.5 (Galer/Madison) and 22 (Interlocken) seems easy. Nevertheless, unless a runner needs a PR it's more of a challenge and accomplishment to finish a Portland or Seattle Marathon type course than more monotonous flat runs.
4.0

By: Ric Hart

Posted: October 04, 2004

I agree the course is not really hilly.

If you are from an area with no natural hills they would maybe a problem for you. But to me they were not bad. Except for the bridge, which is long (but the grade is not steep so I just slowed my pace a bit). The weather was perfect for my asthma; no pollution so I PR'ed big time. I think they said it's rained only twice in the 30 something years of this race and I think that's bigger than the hills thing (no rain again this year). Also much has been made of the pasta feed being a rip off. In the same block as the feed is the restaurant that makes the spaghetti; we ate there by chance and saw them taking it next door. We got to choose what we wanted and it was cheaper and delicious. Take this as a tip! I would go to this marathon again readily if I was not going for 50 states.
3.0

By: Luis S.

Posted: October 04, 2004

Wow, if all were like this I would run forever.

Best running experience of my life. Beautiful course, seamlessly organized, very friendly volunteers. Country's best kept secret.
5.0

By: Robert L.

Posted: October 04, 2004

Marathon remains great

This is a good medium/large race. It isn't super big like Honolulu or Chicago, but it is plenty big enough to have bands every couple miles, lots of aid stations, and lots of running (or walking) company. They fixed the problems from years past with congestion in the exit areas. Some people don't like the 10 or so miles through industrial areas. I don't mind those 10 miles for a few reasons: a) it makes the other prettier areas (like downtown and the bridge) that much better, b) it puts two relatively flat sections (mile 6-11 and mile 12-15) in the middle areas of a course that would otherwise be much hillier, and c) I like the out-and-back industrial section because middle-of-the-packers get to see the top runners fly by and then, on the way back, we get to see all the people both ahead and behind us. Organization of all aspects of this race were great this year... they'd been slacking in the past couple of years, but it seemed better in 2004. I still think that the race organizers are a bit obsessed with bandits. Yes, bandits are bad... but in the other 20ish marathons I've run, I've never encountered a race that goes after them so actively. This is fine... but sometimes I feel like they are griping at us full-paying runners. You get to read about bandits on the website, in the great program, on signage, in the expo, and other places. They famously stop bandits at the St. John's Bridge (near mile 17) and don't let them cross. This seems like a great idea... BUT... I don't really want to watch rent-a-cops chase and chew out bandits. I support kicking these folks out, but watching them get yelled at LOUDLY was, well, I don't know... it made me feel funny. Again, I'm not saying that bandits should be tolerated at all... I'm saying that when I'm 17 miles into a race, I want to be exposed to happy things that help energize me. People yelling at other people does not serve this purpose. In fact, it is quite the opposite. Especially when I have to dodge the course marshalls in their attempts to run down and stop the bandits... and then scream at them. Give me a break - this is NOT what I paid to experience. Others will disagree with me, I'm sure. That's cool. Bandits are not cool. Neither is this particular tactic for dealing with them. Checkpoint Charlie was frankly embarrassing.
5.0

By: Tania D.

Posted: October 04, 2004

Very Well Done

Ok, I ran this marathon yesterday, and from the previous comments it seems like they fixed a lot of things. The course is not the prettiest areas of Portland, but majority of it was pretty flat. They had plenty of electrolytes, water, gummy bears and other stuff available throughout the course. The finishing area was well organized and the shirts were right there (very nice shirts by the way). It would have been nice to have a bag to carry all the food and other stuff they were giving you. They fixed the train problem from what I saw. Over all it seemed very well done and I will do it again next year.
4.0

By: Bret H.

Posted: September 06, 2004

Overrated Marathon

I live in the Portland area and ran the marathon in 2002. I think they overrate this run. Over 1/2 the race is in a boring industrial area. The hills in the race are not that bad, you have one good sized one over a bridge at mile 17 or so then some small ones after that, but the course is mostly flat. I had my PR in Portland in the 3 marathons I have run. The finish area is poorly set up due to limited space. The runners-only area is very small and if you have to find someone after the race 'good luck!' Once you leave the runners-only area it is very crowded with friends and family trying to find each other. If I wasn't tall, my companion would never have seen me. They give out the T-shirts a few blocks away, I couldn't get there because of the crowds and my fatigue level so I never got my finisher shirt. The folks who run this race promote it as the best organized race. Not even close. It is fun to do if you are a local but I wouldn't travel to do this run. The fans are great, especially in the University of Portland area. Aid stations are fine. There are plenty of great areas in Portland for a beautiful race, and this course just isn't it.
3.0

By: Susan E.

Posted: May 24, 2004

Best organized? I don't think so...

I echo what most people have said here, but think it's only fair to include my following experience in 2001. I was running with a group on pace to break 3:10 including several men who were trying to qualify for Boston. We were stopped by a train for ~90 seconds. Obviously chip times do not reflect this break and the train could have been partly responsible for some not qualifying. I found it difficult to start again but still managed a PR. Just thought it was worth mentioning and is a factor to consider when selecting a race! It probably didn't impact that many people, but I was very surprised it happened given the race's reputation as being well organized!
4.0

By: Susan C.

Posted: April 23, 2004

Been there, done it, ain't going back

The course could have been more scenic. The start/finish areas could have been better organized. The spectators and water/aid stations were excellent. Those gummy bears in the later miles kept me going... Having said that, I won't be returning to Portland any time soon. There are a lot of other marathons out there I'd like to try, so why go back?
4.0

By: Toby L.

Posted: January 23, 2004

Comments from a local first-time marathoner

First, I would like to address some prior comments to the 2003 race; specifically the hills and 'Course Police'. Hilly is relative. The Portland area is hilly, so for a race in the Portland area covering this much distance to be this (relatively) flat is amazing. I didn't do any hill repeats, I just ran in the local area (Forest Park is my favorite mid to long run location) and that prepared me for the course's hills. I do have to say, that as a local runner, there ARE more attractive areas for the course that would show off Portland more, but these would only make the course more hilly. Possibly this is a concession that they have made. I actually found that I enjoyed watching the other runners on the out-and-back in the industrial area. As for the 'Course Police', I didn't even notice them. Maybe it was because I was wearing my number on my front, as we are instructed to do. The start area was fine. The lines for the porta-potties were long, so I just ducked into the Hilton (sponsor hotel). I got into the correct pace area about 20 minutes before the start. The aid stations are about every 2 miles and well stocked with water (first) and Powerade (second)- which was a different flavor than the website stated it would be. I trained with GU and checked to see if it was offered. It wasn't, so I just brought my GU flask that I used in training. The entertainment was varied and nicely spaced. The crowds seemed supportive, especially around miles 18-22 (when I needed it most). The other runners were very friendly and I was able to strike up conversations easily. I did have to stop for a train. Apparently there have been problems with long freight trains in the past and the organizers stated that this would not be a problem in 2003. The train I stopped for was an Amtrak train and the stop was all of 30-45 seconds. I just saw it as a rest opportunity and took off after. The finish was well stocked (ice cream and PB&J were especially appreciated). The exit was crowded, but it only took a minute to get through the crowd. Is this the perfect marathon? I don't know, since this was my first. However, I had a great time, will be doing more marathons, and achieved my top goal of a sub-4-hour finish!
5.0

By: Kim U.

Posted: December 28, 2003

Make sure you train for hills...

Up to mile 17, I was convinced I trained well for this race. MAKE SURE you do hill repeats during your training! For some reason, I overlooked the elevation chart prior to the race. To put it lightly, I had to convince myself to make it to the finish. Besides doing some hill repeats, here are some things I advise: - Bring a hydration pack of water bottle pack along. I would have died without my Camelbak, as there weren't water stops at every mile. - If you have family/friends watching during the race, tell them to avoid the finish. There really isn't a clear view of the finishers. - Make sure you stay for a few days before and after the race, so you can enjoy the city. I regret not relaxing more. Despite the 8-plus miles of 'hitting the wall,' I was happy with the race. I managed to spit out a personal record by 2 minutes! I just wonder what my time would have been if I would have done hill repeats...
4.0

By: james F.

Posted: December 09, 2003

A Great Experience!

This was my second marathon and second time in Portland. I do not have any previous marathons to compare to, but I have nothing but good things to say about this race. First of all the city is beautiful. The race organization is excellent. The packet pickup at the expo is fast and simple. The expo itself is more than adequate for a race this size. I thought the starting area was much better organized this year than in 2002. I lined up at the nine-minute mile marker which was clearly visible to me, as were the other pace-markers. The organizers did a much better job of keeping the walkers in the back, which was a major problem last year. The course is not easy, why should it be? Any marathon course has to make concessions to the topography of the city where it is held. Yes there is a long stretch through the dock area and a long stretch past a stinky, smelly, oil refinery, but at least these stretches are flat and fast. I did not see the 'bandit chasers' at the bridge, but I am glad they were there. Bandits do not belong in any race. If you want to run, then pay the entry fee like the rest of us. The food and medical attention at the finish were excellent. I have to echo the one complaint of others that the bottleneck at the exit area was bad. I have just run 26.2 miles, could you make it a little easier for me to get out of here? All in all a great marathon experience that I hope to repeat again someday.
4.0

By: Robert L.

Posted: November 11, 2003

Not quite 'the best', but still great

I've run this race several times. This year (2003), 'the best organized marathon in America' slipped a bit. It's still better than most other races and therefore gets my five stars though. It's a challenging course... with fine water stops and great entertainment. The spectators (at the beginning and in the second half... none in the middle) are awesome. You want to run this marathon. However, be aware: 1) the elevation chart provided on the website has never seemed that accurate. 2) they really messed up the exit chutes in 2003. It was never bad before, but they redesigned the meet-n-greet area in 2003 and this was terrible. I almost passed out waiting to get through the crowd. 3) where for art thou, Runners World? In years past, Runners World showed great support of this race with pacesetters. Not in 2003. 4) what happened to seeding the start? In years past, they had appropriate signage at the start so that fast people lined up in front of slow people. In 2003, I guess they didn't have enough volunteers. They tried, but it was really wonky. I'm only pointing these things out because they bill themselves as the best organized race in America. Not this year. BUT THIS IS STILL A RACE TO TRAVEL TO AND DO!
5.0

By: New Runner

Posted: November 02, 2003

Great Race and Great for PR

This is my second marathon. I have to say it was so good to run this race and made my goal - BQ. I ran NYCM last year and I was very impressed with the race for its organization, size, the expo, the hundreds of international runners, great crowd support, and volunteers. But I like Portland's race just as much for same but for different reasons. Portland race was a very good size, it was much smaller than NYC, but very comfortable. I crossed the starting line quickly and always had many other runners nearby along the course all the way to finish. That I found to be very good as a second-timer. The race started at 7 AM which was a perfect time for me, a morning runner. The temperature was around 50 F and cloudy all through the day. It was the best weather I had in the last 5-6 month including training run days in Washington. The temperature stayed within only few degrees all through the day that was very, very comfortable. The course was flat and well defined with good scenery. What I like the most was that there were always some onlookers to cheer you on, there were many bands playing music, many cheerleaders dancing, and many more locals came out to cheer you on. And they were at arms length from you that you really felt the encouragement. In NYCM, sometimes you could not feel the cheers as some were from 6 to 8 road lanes away. There were plenty of aid stations in Portland. I knew that gel/Gu were not offered along the course as it indicated on the website. Like many others, I carried my own. It would be a good idea for the race organizers to mention this in the registration as some races like NYCM do offer energy gels. Some runners may assume that gel/Gu is offered in any race. The course was definitely flatter than the NYCM and I made it to the finish in more than 30 minutes faster. Not only did I PR, but also BQ at Portland. Portland was a well organized race with great crowd support and good course and so-so comfortable to run in the time of the year. I recommend this race to the first-timers and to veteran runners who want to PR or BQ.
5.0

By: A Runner

Posted: October 20, 2003

No love, but a lot of like

This was my 10th state any my 18th marathon overall. I have run the majors, the minors and many in-betweeners. I must say that I liked this marathon. Whether it is the advertised 'Best' organized marathon in the U.S. is a whole other argument, but I thought it was organized pretty well for its size, and from my running perspective. Registration and packet pick-up was quick, local hotels were cheap, and race morning parking was close and easy to find. To me that would be enough. I'm still trying to come to grips with the description of this course. It's not a crushing course, but I found it to be challenging. There is no way I could PR on a course like this, but that is a personal problem. The topography reminded me a lot of the Pittsburgh or Seattle courses, or even Boston to a certain extent. Not bad company to be compared with. It's just that the hills come in different places and have different personalities than those courses. Strange, I actually enjoyed the industrial area as much as the bluffs. It was flat, calm and fast. In general I thought the course in its entirety was a great representation of the area and city itself. A little urban, a little commercial, a few upscale neighborhoods, some Pacific Nothwest hills and a chance to run some beautiful bridge spans. Not bad. I was not aware of the course marshalls at the St. John's Bridge and can understand how that may have been irritating to some. I must say though, that I applaud their efforts. Unregistered runners and 'pacers' to a certain extent detract from the overall marathon experience for those that pay, train and participate. I wish more marathons put effort into directing unregistered runners off of the course, yet I know it is a difficult task. My only problems on race day were the difficulties in locating all of the mileage markers and the congested exit chute of the finish area. Yes, there were large signs with the mileage embossed on them but they were not always easy to find on the fly, propped here and there. I noted several times that the sign location did not exactly match the painted mileage mark on the pavement. It's minor but when even splits are the objective it's nice to be right on (not 10 yards off), and easy to locate with no effort. I need all the help I can get. I was also suprised that the 1/2 marathon point was not clearly marked. I guess it was where the timing chip mat was? I had almost forgot how big this marathon was until I attempted to exit the finish area. I'm suprised that the best organized marathon does not have a better system for friend and family reunion. As others suggested a side street with location letters would be better. One poor fellow overwhelmed by the effort he has just expended on the course collapsed in the crowd of the exit chute. Fortunately for him there was no way he could even faint properly in the pressing crowd. I must say that emergency personal responded immediately, but it was still a scary, congested scene. The finisher's shirt, medal, rose and seedling were very classy. The volunteers were exceptional and the various divisions (clydesdale, pump and run, etc..) were unique and just plain cool. I normally do not run the same marathon more than once anymore, but I would do this one again.
3.0

By: Inga K.

Posted: October 19, 2003

Great race

Many thanks to the organizing committee, the volunteers and the spectators - they made the Portland Marathon a great experience for me! The course was decent, fairly flat but the St. John's Bridge hill really kicked my butt (I certainly did not expect anything like that, the reality was worse than what I was preparing myself for based on the elevation chart, that's for sure. Also, I expected much more of a downhill at the end). I really should've taken advantage of the marathon course tour that was being offered - if you are doing this race next year I highly recommend it (so you know exactly what to expect, as I was caught somewhat offguard). Also, I would skip the pasta party next time, you could get much better quality food at lower prices pretty much at any restaurant in town (overall, food in Portland was superb and ridiculously cheap... well, I guess I am basing it on NYC prices, but anyways...). Another minor complaint is that there were no gels/bars available at the aid stations at any point of the marathon (it would be nice to at least have them at the last one before the bridge). The post-race food was fantastic though (ice cream was a nice touch!) Those complaining about bandits being turned back at St John's bridge ramp - c'mon... I paid the full fee for the race, so why should my dollars support the bandits - they are not supposed to be there and I am grateful that they were forced off the course, I wish it happened sooner. The great thing about this marathon is that it's fairly small so you are able to run the whole time, not waste valuable seconds fighting your way through crowds (which would suck even more if these crowds consisted of unregistered runners). I thought the 'bandit catchers' were very professional and efficient, at least they did not slow me down a single bit. Overall, I highly recommend this marathon, it's a topnotch race in a fantastic, runner-friendly town.
4.0

By: Sandy S.

Posted: October 13, 2003

I feel this marathon can be missed.

My husband and I, who are normally positive people, were very disappointed by this marathon. Our experience is somewhat limited. We've done 5 marathons in L.A. and decided to attempt to combine a marathon and a vacation. We're walkers, so we probably pay more attention to details along a course than a runner may because we're out there for 5-plus hours. Seattle is my favorite city to visit and I'd hoped Portland would have the same feel and scenery. We knew to expect an industrial section along the route but the loop in the industrial area wasn't the only industrial scenery. The hill on the way to St. John's Bridge was longer and steeper than we had anticipated. In looking at the map and comparing it to L.A.'s marathon, Portland's elevation was suppose to be half the elevation of L.A., but sure didn't feel like it. When I first contacted the Portland Marathon officials, I wanted to know if the train going through the route was still an issue since I'd seen several negative comments on this site. I was told the train was no longer an issue. Lo and behold, we passed the train tracks about a minute before the train arrived. I thought it was a joke when a police officer yelled out that people better speed up if they wanted to beat the train. We didn't expect tons of spectators but we thought there were very few particularly where you'd expect to see spectators in the residential areas. You wouldn't have known Portland is a green, lush area. The lawns were poorly kept up in the few residential areas we did see. The expo was pretty weak with no race stuff - snacks, moleskin, etc. I think it's unfair for people who pay a registration fee not to get a t-shirt if they don't finish the race. I don't know if that's customary. In L.A. your t-shirt comes with your expo bag. Many people wear it the day of the race. If you want a finisher's t-shirt, you have to buy it. I guess it's a matter of preference as to whether or not you want a marathon t-shirt whether you finish the race or not. The positives were that the volunteers did a great job. We shaved off 11 minutes for a new PR. The many bands and cheerleaders were appreciated. The flower, seedling, and snacks at the end of race were first-rate.
2.0

By: Linda N.

Posted: October 12, 2003

This was an awesome race for me

After reading some of the other comments, I have to put my 2 cents in. I guess where you rate a race is all relative to what you have done in the past. This is my 4th marathon, and it was by far the best in every aspect for me. I am from Florida and was worried obviously about the hills. I thought the course had a good mix of hills and flat, that made it bearable. I can't believe someone would say this race was devoid of spectators. There again it's all relative. There were more spectators in this race then there are racers in some of the Florida races. I have never run a race where the people were lining the road like that. And, to still have spectators out by the railroad tracks was awesome. As far as the course, it takes a lot of planning blocking off all the roads, so you almost always end up with some out-and-back industrial area in the race. I have yet to do one without that. The thing that also kept me going was the music along the way. There again, I have never had the privilege of having all that support out there to keep me going. The food at the finish was awesome too. And, they did say ahead of time that you could not cross the bridge without a number. Pretty simple. They were just being safe. Thanks for all the hard work from the volunteers and supporters. It all added up for a great race for me, and I beat my best time by 4 minutes, so I was thrilled. I would definitely do this race again!! Portland is a beautiful place.
5.0

By: Tom P.

Posted: October 09, 2003

Good starter for a local boy

I saw some positive and negative comments on this year's run, so I guess I'll contribute the same. PDX was a good first marathon for me: local, fairly flat, good volunteers and supporters throughout, and friendly runners helping each other through the race. I agree with spreading the start out further, as we were in line for the Honey Buckets and got pinned behind the walkers. The out-and-back around miles 9 to 11 was probably the low point scenery-wise. Maybe I finished too late to notice any Gestapo activity at the St. John's Bridge? All in all, a good first marathon, good experience, and motivation to beat my not-so-great time!
4.0

By: Tamarine C.

Posted: October 09, 2003

Ice cream? Ice cream.

Any marathon that has Haagen-Daz bars at the finish line is ok by me.
4.0

By: Bill D.

Posted: October 08, 2003

Spectator at the St. John's Bridge

I have run Portland 3 times and was a spectator this year, standing at the ramp to the bridge. I watched the MP's (Marathon Police) as they checked bib numbers. While they were assertive asking runners to show their numbers, they were by no means 'Gestapo Agents'. They would explain WHY they were checking numbers and why non-registered runners where not allowed on the bridge. With about 20 runners a minute going by, they did a good job of ensuring only registered runners crossed the bridge. I was there for 90 minutes and they turned back about 40 people without numbers. Some of these people were pacers and some of them were bandits. The bridge is going through a major re-model and is a constuction site, not a safe place for people in running shoes and shorts. The permit for the race specified ONLY registered, numbered runners will cross the bridge. Want to cross? Show your number. Simple. As a racer, I am glad they were checking numbers and keeping the bandits off the course.
4.0

By: Steve R.

Posted: October 06, 2003

Unannounced Checkpoint :(

Unannounced checkpoint slows runners, separates spectators from runners, turns back many without bib at farthest point from start. Poorly communicated. Poorly implemented.
1.0

By: Tom Haig

Posted: October 06, 2003

Fly to Oregon and do anything but this race

I moved to Oregon because it's one of the most beautiful places in America. Unfortunatley you will see none of this along the Portland Marathon course. It runs into the heart of our ugly industrial district, then you do a 180 and run through it again. The race starts at the ridiculously early time of 7:00 a.m. so aside from the water stations the course is void of spectators. You would have more fun flying to Oregon and running ANYWHERE but this course.
2.0

By: Linda H.

Posted: October 06, 2003

starting area is too compact

The starting area needs to be bigger, to allow the runners some SPACE TO MOVE into the appropriate time area. We were on the sidewalk trying to get to the 8-min mile area, and were boxed in, unable to get there. If the starting pen was spread out over a couple of blocks, the sidewalks could be used for traffic to move up and back. Also, we expected the reunion area to have signs of the alphabet, so that families could meet at the letter of their last name. Instead, families were all waiting at the exit chute, creating a bottleneck.
5.0

By: Steve R.

Posted: October 06, 2003

St. John's Gestapo CheckPoint

Negative stars would be more appropriate. An unannounced checkpoint - 16 miles into the race and the farthest from the start - stops runners to check for bibs, turns back spectators, separates spectators tracking runners, and turns back people without bibs. This was my third year. Last year I lost my bib at about mile three. Good thing it didn't happen this year. As it was I had to stop come back down to the Gestapo agent, dig the bib out of the plastic baggie and display it, only to be checked again at the top of the bridge. Next year - strip search?
1.0

By: Robert C.

Posted: August 14, 2003

Good marathon for beginners

I've run this marathon 5 times, and I'll run it many more times. It's conveniently located, and a fairly fast course. There are plenty of aid stations, and mileage markers are well placed and accurate. Race management places emphasis more on making this an 'event' rather than a competitive race, so be aware of that if you are a serious racer. This is a well run marathon, especially for slower runners and walkers. My only grievance is a marathon of this size should do more to promote the competitive aspect of the sport. I feel they have a responsibility here that they've not fulfilled. It would add to the event to have a couple big names at the front to inspire the rest of us and provide some athletic prestige to the race.
2.0

By: Michael J.

Posted: July 31, 2003

Excellent Course, First Marathon

I had heard that Portland was an excellent first-timer’s marathon, and was not disappointed. The organization was excellent and the music along the course was great (almost as good as San Diego, without the “Rock ‘N Roll” billing!), as were the crowds. My only complaint was the industrial loop around miles 9~12, but then, every course seems to have one, and it’s better to have it in the middle than at the end. I thought the finish area was the most efficiently run of any that I have been to. Also, the start was quite well organized, given how many people there were. Nice thing about Portland is that I could stay at a cheap hotel within walking distance of the start, so didn’t have to deal with the Port-o-let lines; even though it was my first marathon, I left the hotel 20 minutes before the gun went off!
4.0

By: Bill Abendroth

Posted: July 15, 2003

In Response To Comments from Mesa, AZ

I've run the Portland Marathon twice (2001 & 2002), and will run it a third time in 2003. I've run thirteen other marathons (Seattle three times), and one ultra (Comrades in South Africa). I have no idea what the person from Mesa is complaining about. In terms of a 'chaotic start', any time you have that many people all lined up, it's going to take time to get moving. In the LA Marathon, I was packed solid with other runners until mile nine. The starts at San Diego Rock & Roll and Big Sur were much more confusing & crowded. Even at the Comrades, which marks only 'gun time,' I needed ten minutes to finally cross the start line. As for the 'finish', you might read the comments about the Rock & Roll - now *that's* a finish area that was a mess. LA was also very difficult, mainly because of the amount of people involved. I don't know what Mesa, AZ's other marathons were, but they couldn't have been of any size. As for the inconsiderate clods of 'power' walkers who start at the three hour pace poll - there is nothing the organizers can do about them. Even in races where corrals are assigned, people cheat & cut ahead. Or they just lie and estimate their finishing time at three hours. But that's all part of what makes racing fun: one more obstacle to overcome. As for the volunteers not pouring enough fluids, and making Mesa, AZ come to a 'standstill,' again that is nothing unusual. A friend of mine ran the 2002 San Francisco Marathon, and at one aid station a table collapsed. All the cups were destroyed, so the volunteers had to pour water into runners' open mouths, just like baby birds. In terms of tables on both sides of the road, that is clearly the exception. You will be sorely disappointed if you expect that at every marathon. And the 'mix up' of water & sport drink - these are all volunteers. When I approach an aid station looking for water, I say 'Water water water water...' and volunteers either hand me four cups, or point me down the line. The biggest criticism I have of Mesa AZ's review, though, is the course itself: What on earth are you talking about in terms of 'screaming downhills'? Are you sure you ran the marathon in Portland, Oregon, USA? I live here. I've run most of the course many times. There are no 'screaming downhills', and only one hill of any consequence: the short one (in terms of distance) up to the St. John's Bridge. The hills in the Seattle Marathon are many times more difficult, as are the hills in San Francisco (as they should be. A San Francisco Marathon without hills? I'd demand my money back). The main hill in Big Sur Int'l Marathon makes Portland look level. I think the only two marathons that were flatter than Portland were the Rock & Roll and Las Vegas. I would put Portland comparable to LA in terms of hills. I'm a little hot under the collar about this, because Portland's a great marathon in a great town. My main man Les (whom I have never met) is still a volunteer, and does a heck of a job putting on a great show. Anyone who thinks the Portland Marathon is 'just thrown together' either doesn't know anything about marathons, or is an idiot. Probably both. Truth be told, if you want to believe Mesa, AZ & not me (because I'm nothing but a big 'homer'), that's actually fine. This year, the Portland Marathon is capped at 9,000 participants, and will probably sell out - despite Mesa's inability to find a shirt.
5.0

By: Martie H.

Posted: February 04, 2003

Never had so much fun being in so much pain

This was my first marathon and I think I picked a pretty good one to start with. On impulse I signed up for the race with a mere 4 weeks to train. Needless to say I was completely unprepared. Somehow I actually completed the race which never would have been possibly without the amazing fan support and entertainment. The scenery was also great and the climate was perfect. The other runners were so friendly, too--I love Oregon! Just when I was about to hit the wall there was a lady standing at the corner with a bowl of gummi bears to save me from a sugar crash. Despite the four hours of agony that I put myself through, I'd do it again in a heartbeat simply because it was such a good time.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: November 02, 2002

read the packet information

I guess that we do things differently than in Arizona. We read the information given out about the marathon. How do you think everyone knew to go to the building to get the t-shirts? When I entered the finishing area there were plenty of volunteers telling us once we left we may not return. That was also very obvious. I've run marathons all over the world and many times the drinks were set up only on one side. What complaints! Hills? Steep grades? Where were you?
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 28, 2002

fun, fairly fast, and a little extra fun

Had a great time in Portland as the race was well organized, the course seemed smooth and varied (except for a couple of industrial stretches), and the fan support was awesome. I PR'd by over 6 minutes which I thought was impossible. There were some small and gradual hills but nothing a northwesterner wouldn't be prepared for. I like how it was scheduled for a decent weather time of year, unlike another big marathon (Seattle). In fact I may just have to run Portland every year instead of Seattle since who wants to run 26.2 in the dark during a biting cold rainstorm!!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 25, 2002

Best Organized --I think NOT!

The start area was pure chaos, runners mixed in walkers. Porta John lines running into the start area. Unless you fight your way right up to the front, you have the pleasure of working your way around walkers for a couple of miles on narrow streets. The water stops where set up in many instances on one side of the road, which early on meant a dead stop to get fuilds. Then you have the add benefit of they changed where the water versus sport drink was at various stops. This course by no means is fast, there are far more long up upgrades with several screaming downhills that lead to another climb. Then you get to the finish area and it to small to accomodate all the runners so you get out of there quickly to be informed that you can't reenter. They never mention where to pick up your finishers Tee shirt, but you difinitely knew you couldn't come back. The one thing that worked great the light rail system, got me from the airport to the hotel and to the start line and back. Plus it was dirt cheap, thanks for small favors. This was my eleventh marathon and I don't consider myself a tough grader, but I wouldn't consider running this one again without some significant changes to the start and finishes area. The honor system on how you line up to start isn't working folks. For the thirty first edition it felt like it had been thrown together a couple of days before.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 23, 2002

awesome race awesome race

You won't find better community support anywhere else. Maybe as good, but not better. Plenty of water stops. Reasonable amount of potties. Good sites... even the 'boring' stretches had bands. Runners encouraging other. Great post-race food. BTW, the comment below regarding a half marathon? Hmmm... The Portland Marathon is only a full... they don't have a half marathon event. Only one killer hill leading up to the St. John's Bridge, but my oh my is it a killer. Fabulous race. If it wasn't the same weekend as other big races, I would run it every year.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 12, 2002

Awesome Rose City Spectator Support!!!

This was my first marathon and I think that the course was great! A couple of steep hills but very exciting. Also the aid stations and course music were great. I'll run it next year again!
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 07, 2002

Hills going out and hills coming back

Three of us ran the half marathon and this course is tough.Sure,it was nice along the waterfront and through the woods but there were some serious hills there.Between the 3 of us we have run 40 or so marathons/half marathons so we know what a hill looks like and there were hills.The race was well organized except for a lack of porta-potties.Plenty of water and post race treats.Finisher medals to all finishers and nice mock turtle T-shirts.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 07, 2002

A couple more comments

I just wanted to add to my last comments. After reading the negative comments about the race I was scared of the long industrial stretch. It was fine! Yes, not very pretty but with music and people all along the way, who cares? You come out of the industry through funky NW and all of those fun folks out there CHEERING you on as you go. Soon you're half way and you're on the long (how many times have I heard the word boring?) part to the St John's bridge. But, it was fine. It was flat, cars were passing but politely so and many of them also cheering on our bravery. Soon it's mile 17 and we were on the bridge! Beautiful! We looped through gorgeous Eastside and I was overwhelmed by the volunteers and all of the people out cheering us on. What about those belly dancers? Who asked that girl to come out and throw her batton? Who asked that lady to belt out the blues? Who asked that group of people to do the wave as we ran by? Who asked the college kids to blast 'Eye of the Tiger?' for us at mile 19? I loved it! All these people were doing it for us! And then coming in on the waterfront, one man kept yelling, 'No more miles now! Just minutes!' Crossing the finish line was spectacular and we were treated so well. How many of those volunteers looked me in the eye and said, 'You are awesome! Well done!' After reading previous comments I dreaded getting my t-shirt. What were those people complaining about? You walk with the sea of foil-wrapped runners, down a little incline to a speedy table to get a sappling and then to the table for your shirt, oh yes, and we were congratulated the entire time. You loop back up and there are pictures and family. It was awesome. I had my slowest time of 4 marathons but the best time of my life! It was my sister-in-law's first marathon. She had told me that she was afraid of what it would be like and that she hoped it wouldn't be so bad that she would never run one again. I turned to her as we crossed the Steel bridge at mile 25, 'Are we doing this next year?' she looked through corner of her eye, 'Oh yeah!' RIGHT ON!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 07, 2002

Most fun i ever had in a marathon

Course: Some camber, hills not too bad, no much scenery, pretty fast, awesome spectators and volunteers. Aid stations: wicked awesome. I wouild like to add that, here and there in the first 18 miles, the road surface was slick with moisture and motor oil, that doesnt affect most people but some will be unable to use a natural stride. The Volunteers and pro's were always there for you!!! Go to Port! its fun, fun, FUN.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 06, 2002

Just a fun run

Ok, I read all of the comments about this marathon this morning at 3 o'clock as I prepared to run it. Yes, the damn walkers get VERY annoying. They stay all over, left side, right side, down the middle. With that said, I loved it! The people were great, volunteers, spectators and runners. The music, cheerleaders and food along the way were awesome and saved me. Gummy bears? Skittles? Ladies dressed as hula girls? Signs quoting the bible? Garage sales? Industry? Autumn leaves? Portland! It was so fun! Even my friend who watched and husband who skipped it vowed to do it next year. It was awesome and I am tired....
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 20, 2002

what a hoot

A very nice course to run. The entertainment is great and the crowds are great. Just an all around fun event to run. Looking forward to it again.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 17, 2002

EXCELLENT!

This race was great! The course is really flat and fast. There is an industrial park which you go out and back through but sometimes that is unavoidable. Only one major hill on the course. The finish is mostly downhill. Yes, the train that people had to wait for in 2001 must have been a real downer for those trying to qualify. Kudos: If you have to stay in a hotel, stay downtown. You can then walk to the starting line! T-shirts are long sleeve, Cool-Max, but they are the same every year except for the year. Awards are great. Plaques go 3 deep in each age group. Finisher medals are huge. Postrace food is plentiful. Expo was great. Finisher magazine was thick and colored with numerous photos. Gripes: Finish line is tightly packed in an enclosed area. The train in 2001 that prevented some from reaching qualifying times.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 01, 2002

sorry sir, strictly no tshirt size exchange

I ran Portland last year. Organization is just as good as anywhere else. Great start 7 am sharp when it's still dark. By the time it gets warm it's almost over. Not too many spectators if you're looking for some. But, the gypsies & residents at M17, 20 & 26 deserve a 5 rating for showing up where it counts. I liked the course except for some narrow streets & industrial areas. Ideal for walkers to finish a marathon. No racewalker division here. After you finish, it's still a good walk to claim your finisher shirt. If you have dead legs, that's too bad. Otherwise, no big deal. The big deal is STRICTLY no tshirt size exchange. I have run so many races (5k's to marathon) but this is one for the books. Your time is posted ASAP (super!!) Overall, I'll consider coming back. It's a beautiful city with hospitable people everywhere.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 03, 2002

Good enough to run 5 times

Portland was my first marathon back in '92 with a time around 3:25. I loved it and came back 4 more times, my last being in '97. The spectators and support are the best. The entertainment throughout is very unique to Portland...haven't found it in any other marathons. I have run marathons with prettier scenery, but some with a lot worse. Portland pampers their runners at the finish. I recommend this for first-timers and those who don't mind running in the warmer climate...drink tons of water or you'll end up in the first aide tent like me.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 01, 2002

Best organized?????

I have heard from several sources that this was one of the best organized marathons in the country. Pure propaganda! The water stations didn't have enough water/sports drinks poured and ready for the runners as they arrived. The race felt more crowded than larger races I've run, because the course is so poorly set through narrow streets. Then at the end they send you down into the basement of a building to get your finishers shirt. I don't know about most runner's, but I know when I'm finished with a marathon I don't want to go on a hike to find my shirt. I don't mean to sound bitter, but it makes me angry that they bill this as one of the best organized marathons. I've run 4 other marathons in the last year and they were all better organized than this. It was a beautiful course with the exception of the industrial part of town. Even though this is my old home town I won't run this one again soon.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: March 26, 2002

The Best I have seen so far

Portland was my second marathon and I had a great time! Yes, that awful out and back through the industrial area could be changed, but overall I enjoyed the course. I train on hills, so the course was an easy run for me. I do admit the hill up to the St John's Bridge at mile 17 is tough, but it is still doable. Compared to the RnR in San Diego, I thought the spectactors were a lot better. The finish line was great. I was through it much faster than San Diego. The volunteers at the end were just great! The food was awesome. I loved the ice cream and thanks to the volunteer who opened the package for me. Yes, it needs some improvements, but remember this race is organized for the everyday runner. I will be doing this one again and again!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: January 23, 2002

Industrial scenery & stop for the train

This is touted by the PM organizers as being one of the best organized with beautiful scenery. I'm sure that's the intent, but that's not how the 2001 event came off. Got stuck standing around at the midway point for over 3 minutes waiting for a freight train to leisurely pass by. C'Mon, stopping for a train to pass in the best organized race? They need to drop that advertisement because it's not true. I half expected the drawbridge to go up as we crossed back over the river. Must be saving that gem for the 2002 race. Really glad my Boston qualifying time was 3:20 and not 3:10 or I'd have been screwed. Sorry, but for me that immediately knocks it out as being a well organized event. And the scenery was primarily warehouses and dilapidated roadside businesses....that's the best of Portland? I don't think so. OK, some was through nice neighborhoods, but the primary impression is gray, drab, and industrial. Won't be recommending this one to any friends.
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: November 02, 2001

Not what I expected

I ran the Portland Marathon this year, it was my third marathon after doing Austin and Seattle last year. Despite claiming to be “best organized in North America”, I found this not exactly to be the case. There were not enough portajohns at the start, and the water/Powerade stations were too infrequent. A water station was nowhere to be found between miles 15.5 and 18 (or maybe I was too delirious to see it at this point), the toughest stretch of the course where runners climb up and down the St. Johns bridge. The weather wasn’t optimal either – the high in Portland on Sunday was in the mid-80s. However, it is a fairly beautiful course, but if you’re looking for a PR, look somewhere else. I did like the goodies they had at the finish line, the rose and Douglas fir seedlings were nice touches.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 31, 2001

A highly overrated event.

The muscle division competition was cancelled without advance notice and without explanation at registration. The food at the awards ceremony was not very good and was overpriced. Good number and spacing of water stations. Entertainment was good. The course is not scenic - Vancouver and Seattle are more fun and visually appealing while on the run (than Portland).
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 08, 2001

Overall I loved Portland

I do agree with everyone about the ugly stretches you have to run through. The out & back stretch early on was particularly unappealing. And the highway after the halfway point leading up to 'The Bridge' was disappointing. I'm sure Portland has much nicer areas they could take the course through. Even if it made the course hillier I would not mind. I would give up ugly & flat for attractive & a few hills. I did not get caught by the train but a few of my friends did. Overall I had a great time in Portland and a PR to boot! I thought the music on the course was great & as far as I could tell, it was well organized. I could have used a bag at the finish line to haul all the food they gave me. The BEST finish line food (peanut butter bagels & ice cream!) I've had in 16 marathons by the way - just no beer! As far as the spectators, people in Portland need to know that you wear your name on your shirt so they can call out your name & encourage you on. Usually by mile 18, I'm tired of hearing my name, but I think maybe 3 people in Portland noticed my name on the front of my shirt. Great t-shirt & medal AND a fir seedling & a rose too. I would recommend this one.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 07, 2001

Support is adequate - course is not

It's unfortunate as I live here that this could be a fabulous city to run a marathon. Unfortunately, the dreariness of the Front Street Blues once you head away from downtown is just depressing. Once you exit the industrial windy section out towards the hill at the St.Johns Bridge it feels like an oasis to be back in greener pastures as you run past the University of Portland. The last six put you back in the north industrial section (remember if you are not from Portland there is more to this city than this) before heading by the Rose Quarter and over the Steel Bridge towards the finish back in downtown. The only negative experience I had is I needed some aid at the end of the course and I was met by five first aid bodyguards who refused me entrance to the medical area, interesting? If PM selects a different course and makes it a bit easier to meet your family after the marathon they could have such a better event. The crowds are great and the number of water stops is a real plus if you are a first time marathoner.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 04, 2001

not meeting my expectations

Portland was my 10th marathon. And it's not quite as organized as I hoped. They should stop using that 'best organized marathon' slogan, because it just creates expectations that couldn't be met. This year was hot, close to 80F. Saw many runners/walkers being carried away by ambulance. To me the course is not too hilly. I live and train on hilly roads that are longer and steeper. (I didn't think Seattle marathon was hilly either, so just a personal feeling) But running so much through the industrial areas was not so good. The added bands were good, but some of them were playing across the 4-lane road over traffic that you could hardly hear them. The one thing about the finish area, they had all kind of food and snacks. But they didn't hand out any bags, how much can you carry with two hands when you are already trying to hold on to a cup of water? There were no signs to direct runners to the area where you pick up your finisher shirt. It was down a block hidden in the basement. Both Vancouver Marathon and Victoria Marathon in Canada are better races.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 03, 2001

Great Race

This is a great marathon. I really enjoyed most of it except for the hill at mile 18. It is great to run a marathon that the whole city really gets into. I arrived in Portland four days before the race and everywhere downtown there were banners announcing the upcoming marathon. The good points of the race are as follows: great support from spectators, mostly flat course for first 17 miles, great entertainment throughout course, plenty of water stations (maybe too many), awesome finisher t-shirt and medal, and the race takes place in a beautiful city. The few downsides to the race is that the first few miles the course isn't wide enough for the runners to spread out, the course gets rather hilly after mile 17, there were not enough Johns for the first 6 or 7 miles, a long stretch through an ugly industrial area, and after running 26 miles I did not like walking a block through the spectators and then down a stairway to get my finsher's shirt. But overall this marathon, as well as the city of Portland, is definitely worth a trip from anywhere in the country. I do plan on doing this race again in the future but will prepare myself with much more hill training.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 02, 2001

Best Organized????

While I enjoyed this marathon, it was not even close to being the best marathon I've run in. The weather was great. For the most part the course was scenic, although a little too hilly for me. The fan support was great and the musicians along the way gave it a real Oregon feel. The Portland marathon touts itself as the best organized in the US. I started to question this at the first water stop, where the volunteers were still pouring water and powerade as the runner's arrived. At each water station you had to stand and wait for the volunteers to get the drinks and hand them out. Not a big deal to someone who runs as slow as me, but not a sign of organization. While the course was pretty, it was so narrow that you never completely got away from the other runners. The Los Angeles Marathon with three times as many runners didn't seem this crowded. After the finish they make you walk down into the basement of a building to get your t-shirt. I don't mean to sound negative. This was a good marathon; it just doesn't deserve the reputation of being well organized.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 02, 2001

First marathon and loved it

Portland was my first marathon, and I loved every moment of it (the first 18 miles anyway). The course, weather, entertainment, runners, fans, organization, perks--they were all first rate. Having not run any other marathons, I can't really rate it with any kind of intelligence. All I know is that I can't think of anything about the race that disappointed me. It was a hoot!
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: August 23, 2001

Good race for your first marathon...

Ran my first marathon in Portland in '97. As others here have stated, it's a great course other than the 5 or so miles in the freight yards. The hill up to the St. Johns Bridge is not all that difficult. If it's a clear day, be sure to have sunglasses as you will be running into the sun from St. Johns all the way back to downtown. The first mile can get a bit congested, especially as the course enters Chinatown. If you are a PR seeker, you may want to start a bit faster than normal. Well organized race, I would recommend it.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: February 24, 2001

What happened?

One question for the race organizing committee...what happened to that great 1984 course? This was my first marathon (1984), and I ran it again in 1999. The course has digressed. I agree with the other (Oregon) marathoner: why spend so much time in the industrial area when there are so many other scenic areas in Portland? In general I do agree with the comments about excellent logistical support in the form of beautiful finisher's medal, great finish line food, and plenty of finsih line support.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: January 19, 2001

Not 'The Best Organized Marathon' anymore!

Where to start? How about the '10 minute miles' sign less than half a block from the '14 minute miles' sign? It took me almost 6 minutes to get to the start and three miles to get passed all the walkers. This is to say nothing of the spectators who insisted on lining up in the street to get better camera shots of their marathoners. Then there were the non-waterproof markers to mark drop-off bags while it was raining. Should we discuss the fact that the race expo space was about half what was needed? And the line to pick up your number and chip backed up to the escalators which hordes of people were still coming down on. I've run 13 different marathons. Maybe it was only the 2000 that was so messed up, but Portland wouldn't even make my top 10. Sorry, guys, I know you're all volunteers, but I believed your hype.
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: January 13, 2001

Well-organized? Think again.

One of the reasons I registered for this race last year was because it was ranked as one of the best-organized races in the U.S. according to 'The Ultimate Guide to Marathons.' I have few complaints: We were told by the race volunteers that Portland's light rail trains started early on race day. Wrong. Let's just say 'thank goodness for the chip.' I've never been late to the start of a race; that was aggravation I didn't need. Why is Portland just now getting the chip, apparently donated by Nike? This isn't something you expect from what is supposed to be one of the best marathons in the country. I digress . . . I was stopped by a FREIGHT TRAIN for 3 minutes at around the halfway point -- not a big deal unless you're going for a PR, which hundreds, if not thousands, of us were. Apparently this train thing happens all the time. Funny, it wasn't mentioned on the web site. I didn't mind that the course wasn't particularly scenic. That's fine, but Portland advertises itself as a good place to come if you want to run a PR. Being stopped by a train is unacceptable. I apologize for the sarcasm and the negative tone of this post, but I was disappointed with this race (ya think?). It certainly wasn't worth a trip across the country. By the way, I got my PR by six minutes, thank you very much.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: November 24, 2000

Great people and event - work on the course though

This is my hometown run and it's a great event - runs smoothly, good aid stations, and great fans. The one complaint we locals have (aside from the hill at mile 17) is the long mileage spent in the industrial area, just flat boredom with ugly views. No one I know goes here during the rest of the year, why do we bring guests to our city there when there are so many other beautiful sections of town? Nevertheless, I'd encourage you to come in 2001!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: November 08, 2000

SUPERB ORGANIZATION

This marathon has a well earned reputation of being the best organized marathon in America. Everything from the pre-race expo to the finish line is set up for the runner. They even give you a bag to haul all the food they give you at the end of the run. The course is nice, even though the hill at mile 16 (to reach the St John's bridge) is grueling. Aid station support is super, and the crowds are enthusiastic. This is the perfect race for a first timer.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 05, 2000

Great race for walkers and slower runners.

We didn't have great weather for the 2000 Portland Marathon, but the locals still came out to cheer and entertain us. The hills didn't bother me, but there were very strong headwinds for much of the course that made me feel like I was on a treadmill... putting out lots of effort but going nowhere. No PR for me on this day. This is a good race for walkers and slower runners as the course stays open for 8 hours with full support. People finishing in seven hours will get just as big a reception at the finish as those who finish in three hours. Tons of food at the finish and plenty of pre-race information. My only complaint is that the course spends too much time in industrial areas where the only view is of warehouses and shipping containers. Portland is a beautiful city, but you'd never know it for many of the marathon miles..
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 04, 2000

They really have their act together!!

I really enjoyed this marathon! The course was very beautiful and what a rush it was to run over the St. Johns Bridge. There are just enough hills to keep you on your toes. I loved the downhills near the end. It had the BEST T-SHIRT and MEDAL!!! The only small complaint I have is that they could have better and bigger mile markers. I missed 3 of them! The rose given to all finishers is a really nice touch. Keep up the good work!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: October 02, 2000

Great volunteers -- people's race -- gentle hills

I like this marathon for the great volunteers and the crowd support -- it is a pretty flat course for the first 16 miles. Mile 17 there is a hill that people talk about -- I don't think it's the end of the world though. But both times that I have run it, miles 21 to 26 have seen a lot hillier than I expected. They are gentle hills but it's good to remember that they are there and keep some gas in the tank for the last 10K! It's definitely a race geared for the average runner rather than for the elite runners.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 08, 2000

This is a perfect first timers marathon!

The Portland Marathon was a blast.The scenery was great running through city blocks, over bridges and through neighborhoods full of enthusiastic spectators. It wasn't too hilly and the weather in October was great!
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: May 13, 2000

My favorite marathon

Maybe it's because this was my first marathon (and second, and third), but Portland will always hold a special place in my heart. From the 85+ year old woman who starts the race 1/2 hour or so before everyone else, to the entertainment along the way - including a guy dressed into a tux whistling classical music, and a group of bagpipers in kilts around mile 18 - to the hill at mile 16 that's just tough enough to add a little drama to the race - the Portland marathon has all the elements that make a marathon a memorable experience. At the end of the race you're handed a rose, and turned loose into the biggest post marathon feast I've ever seen.
5.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide