Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Providence Marathon
Back

Providence Marathon - Race Reviews

3.2
Average rating based on 166 Reviews

By: Scott K.

Posted: May 22, 2023

Bigger cups please

Plenty of manned fluid stops but served up in the cups that used to be used at the dentist office. Maybe 2 ounces? Electrolyte drinks mixed differently at each table. Some were fully concentrated without water added and undrinkable, some were diluted correctly. Course was ok. Only 1 timing mat on the course at about mile 12.7. I wish we did not have to run some of the race on the shoulder of a bridge. The course was well marked. Had an hour early start which is nice. Course stayed opened longer than announced. Medal is nice. Good beer at finish but not a lot of nutritional goodies unless you had money for the food trucks. Nice hoodie. Hotels were conveniently located to walk to start. Food in Providence is excellent. Just needs some slight fixes to make it a better race.
2.0

By: Nancy S.

Posted: May 08, 2023

Not Flat, But Nice Course

I'll echo earlier comments, because this was still being advertised as 'our flat & smooth course'... rest assured, it is rolling hills, particularly in the front section of the course (so the front end and the back end of the full marathon course). That said, the organization is very good... really not an expo to speak of, just a simple bib pick up... very nice heavy duty hoodie too. The course is mostly nice in Providence, but the best part is the bike trail section, residential areas, and the fabulous views of Narragansett Bay. Other parts not as scenic, but you don't expect it to all be... some shoulder of the highway stuff and industrial area stuff thrown in. Pleasant surprise was the number of spectators out!! Very enthusiastic, and the water stops were all good. It was hot this year (obviously nothing organizers can do about that). Providence is a lovely place to visit!!!
5.0

By: Br F.

Posted: December 05, 2019

Excellent Organization, Rolling-Hills Course

As other reviews have stated, the course is not FLAT flat. There are rolling hills, placed at some tough sections of the course (including near the end). However, the aid stations and the people manning them are FANTASTIC. Plenty of aid and plenty of friendly, cheering volunteers. Packet pick-up is easy and parking is conveniently located at the mall, right next to the start. Post-race was awesome, great beer choices. This past year was rainy so definitely a lack of spectators, but based on this course (and the half-marathon I've done in the past), plenty of the course is not spectator-friendly anyways.
4.0

By: Kevin McAree

Posted: May 06, 2019

Do your hill training.

Was listed as a flat course but if you are going to do this race be expected for hills. So do your hill training. Water stops were excellent. It was raining but there is not much you can do about that except try not to run through the puddles. Don't know what else to say to help other prepare themselves for this race.
4.0

By: Richard F.

Posted: May 06, 2019

Nice small race

First time running Providence. The course has some nice parts, the bike path through the parks and by the water in particular was great. Small downtown piece was good too but I felt not going anywhere near the beautiful Statehouse Capital building was a huge error. There are some other drawbacks, some pieces are on a small section of highway and it gets clustered, other pieces are just boring. Warning, this is hilly, most of the race is rolling hills but there are a couple of SHARP ones at the Mile 23/24 piece that killed people at the end. Small race and rain so not a lot of spectators but the ones that were there were enthusiastic and appreciated. Last thing, I want to give infinite credit to the race as there were plenty of aid stations and they were well stocked. Beyond liquids all had gel or bananas or something else. Huge tip of the hat there. Overall, worth it. Providence is a cool city too, if you are a 50 stater this is the obvious RI choice. Beyond that, a solid small race.
4.0

By: Mike M.

Posted: May 13, 2017

Very good race with a couple flaws

Overall I really enjoyed this race. Nice course, well organized, and plenty of good hotel options close to bib pickup and the start/finish line. As for the course, I'll offer one comment, not as a criticism, but rather a warning: there are a few fairly tough hills during the last few miles. Be careful. Saw a lot of bonking from miles 23-25, almost including myself. Which brings me to the after-party. Great beer choices from Shipyard Brewery. Very nice touch. A couple complaints. The first is minor. I felt that only awarding 1st place for the age-groups, especially given that they were already split into 10-year groups, rather than 5-year, was a little stingy. I don't think I've ever been in a race with over 1,000 runners that didn't recognize 2nd and 3rd place. The second complaint is far more serious, but is actually in reference to the 5k race, not the marathon. My son-in-law, who is working himself back into marathon shape, had chosen to do the 5k. He was walking to the start line at 8:07, 8 minutes before the scheduled 8:15 start, when he heard the announcer call 'on your marks, GO!'. Granted, with chip timing he was still able to 'race the clock', but starting a race minutes ahead of the scheduled start time is inexcusable.
3.0

By: Greg H.

Posted: May 11, 2017

An average experience

I'm working on 50 states. I've run a lot of different races. Here's my take: I think my biggest problem with this race is the fact that it is billed as 'flat.' Being a midwesterner, my definition of flat might differ, but this is NOT a flat course. There are some pretty challenging hills in the first 3-4 miles and then you hit them again at the end. To me, when I'm trying to establish a good pace at the start and when I'm hitting the wall at the end are the wrong times for hills. The course was really pretty in some parts. I loved running by the water. Average medal, below average t-shirt. Organization was not good. Example: On my watch, mile 19 came at 19.36 miles. Mile 20 came .8 miles later at 20.16. One mile sign was blown down. A volunteer tried to point me down the wrong path at one point. Finish line: food was good. But where was the drink? They handed out TINY bottles at the finish line, but there was nothing to wash down my food at the tent on the other side of the barriers. I just ran a marathon. Can I have some more to drink? Speaking of drink: Gatorade was pretty hard to find on the course. Expo wasn't worth the time. Omni Hotel is overpriced, but is located conveniently to start/finish and the late checkout was a huge plus. I'd pay a premium to stay here.
3.0

By: John D.

Posted: July 15, 2016

Good, one course complaint

I thought the marathon was well organized. I recommend it. One complaint I had was course confusion around mile 25. You come to a fork where the course path was not clear. To the left was a park path along the river and to the right was an empty road. There were cones, but they didn't indicate which direction to go, and there were no staff. A few of us looked at each other confused. I think we picked correctly, but at that point in the race, it's frustrating to think you may have just run off course. But other than that, happy I ran Providence.
5.0

By: Michael S.

Posted: May 16, 2016

Pleased with the Race

I ran Providence in 2016. I enjoyed the experience. Very little of the race is actually in Providence, but the start and finish is. The highlights of the course were the pedestrian paths through forest and wetlands. I also enjoyed the turnaround point where the only thing separating you from the ocean is a scenic golf course. I also enjoyed a scenic neighborhood close to the turnaround point. There were some fans at the finish, but overall a pretty quiet race. The course is set up to have fans see you multiple times which I liked. The tech shirt is great (I rarely keep them, but I will definitely use this one). I like the anchor medal too. The race starts and finishes at a nice park which is close to hotels and the train station which makes travel logistics for both the trip and the race day very simple. Overall I found the course pretty flat and most of it is below sea level. There are some notable hills though, especially the last few miles which are exacerbated by tired legs.
4.0

By: Anthony Cardosi

Posted: May 02, 2016

Great Course!

This is a great course to run. Fairly flat throughout but some good scenery along the way.
4.0

By: Nedim C.

Posted: May 13, 2015

Not Very Scenic

We stayed at the Omni Hotel right at the start. The good news is that all marathon runners get late checkout and the marathon start/end is literally at the next block. The bad news is that the Hotel is overpriced, not soundproofed, under maintained and does not have it's own restaurant ... good luck getting a quick breakfast. I was running the marathon with my wife and we were aiming at 4:30. We were very pleased to see that there was a 4:30 pacer provided. That said, the poor woman was clearly overpowered, she ran way too fast for the first couple miles and then did not get relieved at her expected 12 mile mark ... she tried to keep pace but just could not and was slowing down more-and-more until she was relieved many miles later. I almost wanted to take over, but was committed to making sure my wife finishes, regardless of time. The marathon started 15 minutes late and that was a bit annoying. There were just enough water stops  I would have said 'plenty', but there was a long stretch without one. There were relatively few spectators and most of them were parents of the Dreamfar kids (High School Marathon project). It seems that there is no awareness in the city about the marathon  the waitress in a nearby restaurant we were the night before had no clue there was a marathon going on the next day. However, the biggest disappointment was the route. The route was less than scenic for most of the first two-thirds of the race. There is a long stretch on a bike trail at some point and that is great. I only wish the entire race was on that bike-trail, it would have made all the difference. There were a couple of hills, but nothing worth fretting. There is a short-but-steep hill towards the very end that literally every single runner we saw walked up, but you will not lose much time  it really is short. After the race, we wanted to grab lunch in downtown, but most of the restaurants are closed Sundays. :( Too bad, the city could have so much going for it.
4.0

By: Shawn J.

Posted: May 04, 2015

Not a race I'd run again.

My partner and I are 50 staters so were attempting the marathon in each state. This was our RI race. As we ran a marathon in NJ the day before, I decided to take it easy and run with him who is naturally a 5:30 ish runner. Here's my take on the race: 1.) Very small and underwhelming expo. Why anyone would pay 200 to 300 a night for a hotel room is beyond me. We stayed at the airport for literally a third of that and its 9 min from DT. 2.) Yes the course is hilly but not overly bad and its more hilly up front so I'd take it easy at first knowing its flat for the majority of the middle half of the race. My gripe with the course is that if that was what Providence has to offer why would anyone live there? We were either running on the shoulder of a somewhat busy unscenic road or on a bike trail. As others have mentioned the roads are bad with potholes etc and I agree the non race runners and bikers on the trail were oblivious to runners. 2.) We finished in 5:47. There was nothing besides bananas at the finish. No pizza. Nothing. When I inquired about pizza which was advertised, the said they ordered a couple more for the 'straggler' runners but that's it as they were over their agreed allotment. Yes the person at the pizza counter actually said this. 3.) The race started late once again which seems to be a yearly thing. 4.) The medals are actually nice. 5.) Very little spectators. 6.) Their website is as if a 10 year old made it. Try finding any info on there. It's a shame RI can only put on a race such as this. I will say we have run all over the country and use this time to gauge areas we want to return to for family trips. RI isn't one of them.
3.0

By: Elaine G.

Posted: September 24, 2014

Nice, small marathon - but a windy 2014!

This was only my 2nd marathon, my first being Philly, so I was shocked (in a good way) by the intimacy of THIS 'city' marathon! Hotel booked was at Omni just steps from start/finish. Prices were very reasonable and accomodations were great. It's connected to Expo (packet pickup) and mall. There was a cheer competition going on, but the Desk Agent mentioned they were putting marathon runners and cheerleaders in opposite towers. Phew! Expo left a little to be desired (I did the upgrade package and wouldn't recommend it). The shirts were so over-sized and ill-fitting. I was kind of bummed out, as I've been to local half marathons with nicer shirts. Maybe in the future they'll offer women's sizing instead of unisex?Then again my previous experience was Philly's huge expo. Overall though, I found everything to be well-organized and got my bib quickly. Race day I was surprised when I lined up by pace to be maybe 10 deep from the start. (I'm not that fast - 4hr marathon). Just shows how small it was - which is great! Loved that the blue trailer lockers were there to store your stuff. Plenty of potties w/ minimal wait as well. They thankfully also had different start times for the half and the full. I didn't think the course was THAT hilly. A noticeable hill around mile 6 and mile 20... and then a really steep horrible hill at around 22 that I had to walk up. (Everyone was cursing it)! Also, you run through a park area around mile 23/24 with cobblestones for 1/4 mile. UGH. Cobblestone - really?! Otherwise, it's a fairly flat course. Most of it is on bike paths (and streets weren't heavily embanked either). I did hate how they couldn't close the paths off to bike/pedestrian traffic. No major issues while I was running, but it was a pain having to weave through more people that didn't care to move out of the way of the action. Not as much crowd support compared to bigger cities, but those that were there were energetic and positive. I carried a fuel belt so didn't notice any funky water stop placement. Only around mile 23 was there an issue with the water stop. There was so much wind, they couldn't keep dirt out of the cups. They resorted to individual pours which bottlenecked things a bit. The only real negative I encountered were the 25-30mph headwinds I dealt with for the last 10 miles. This is out of anyone's control though. Had it not been for the wind I probably would have PR'd. Found food to be plentiful at the end (at least when I finished). Fruit, turkey wraps, and of course the beer tent. (I was too nauseous to eat any of it, but it looked good)! Didn't even realize there were food trucks - just too out of it at that point I guess! I do recommend this race and would even race it again in the future if I needed a local Spring marathon and didn't want to travel too far. (I live in MA).
4.0

By: mary d.

Posted: May 18, 2014

First marathon

This was my first marathon and I thought the route was very scenic. No there weren't a lot of spectators along the route but I didn't expect there to be that many. People complained about the hills but they did post an elevation map. Like any race, you should know your course. Aid stations were listed too. As for the wind, not much anyone can do about the weather. I received my medal and a heat wrap after I finished the race. For those people that complained about the volunteers, volunteer at a race. It was my first time to Providence and I really enjoyed the city and would love to go back again. My one disappointed was that on Saturday night I couldn't enjoy all of the food trucks that were out! It would not have made a great race day.
4.0

By: David Weiss

Posted: May 12, 2014

An enjoyable race for the most part

Overall, enjoyed the race...just a stone's throw from Boston where I was visiting for the weekend (hr 20 min drive) The Good: Very easy getting into/out of town race morning, simple race pack pickup available on morning of the race-I LOVE this being an out of towner, considering most races do not do this, this is a huge perk and is something I look for when picking a race; very nice finishers medal, I really enjoyed the course, I thought it was a fairly flat, scenic course; aid stations had plenty of aid, volunteers at aid stations were friendly and helpful, plenty of port a potties at start, police officers did a great job of traffic control, results posted very quickly, love when marathon given its own start separate from 1/2ers The bad...running through a park system and the weekend bikers out riding their bicycles 20 miles an hour and not really seeming to care about the runners, the aid stations had plenty of goodies, but they had wierd spacing, some very close together, other times longer distances between aid stations (that being said, i never felt stations were ridiculously far apart); at the finish line, typically my experience has been volunteers out handing medals to finishers are extremely enthusiastic, help guide absolutely exhausted runners to where food is, etc...in this case I finished, got a foil warmer, no one stopped me and I realized, oh crap, i didnt get a medal...had to walk back adn tap a volunteer on the shoulder to get a medal, who then quickly handed it my way without a word...also got no guidance anywhere as to where any food was; I was given a bottle of water and gatoraide, which happened to be quite warm...I did LOVE the line of food trucks, however not knowing about this, I had no money since mine was all in my car in the parking garage-and no way was my tired self walking all the way back from my car to get some of that food! (advertise the food trucks being there!) Ive seen other races do a great job of creating a pre race buzz via email and social media, and this race unforunately didnt do that The ugly....no one has control over it...but the STRONG winds against/crosswinds the last 5-6 miles were tough! Overall, an enjoyable race
4.0

By: charles west

Posted: May 10, 2014

Decent small city marathon

Having heard complaints about the last half of the Newport marathon course, I chose Providence to cross Rhode Island off my list. The area hotels were not gouging you like most do during big city marathons. The city was a bit hectic with the circus in town and parking was tight if you were arriving around the same time as the start of a performance. The course could be described as rolling hills. There was a bit of wind during the race and additional water stations would have been nice but they were about 2-3 miles apart. I found the breeze off the bay to be refreshing. Here are my cons: 1) Thru no fault of the race directors but the course ran by a classic car show and there was someone at the entrance that tried to stop runners to let the cars thru. Most runners kept running but I did see one car just go thru the crowd and resulted in many curses from runners who were nearly hit. 2) There was not much food. The directors need to provide more than a banana and a 1/4 of a chicken tortilla. There was unlimited beer and it was good beer (no coors light or bud light) so that helped. I don't expect buffet but I hope for at least 600 calories to help replenish the 3000 I just burned. The race was nice. I would not go out of my way to repeat but the directors did their best to hit the highlights of the city. It would have been nice if Hasbro (which has it's corporate headquarters a few blocks from the start) would be a sponsor.
3.0

By: ce s.

Posted: May 08, 2014

Decent Small Marathon

This was my 14th marathon so I like to think I know a thing or 2 about what to expect. This was exactly what I expected. This was my first small marathon and it actually was nice break from all the craziness involved in the major marathons. The start was easy to get to and seed yourself in. There were pace groups and it was easy to navigate the course with less runners then my usual experience. The course has hills yes.. but the only one that really got me was around 21& but at that point anything will get you. I have run some hilly courses this didn't seem to be that bad to me. The wind was the only real issue I had with the race which is out of anyone's control. The water stops did seem to be spread out and the gatorade was only available at certain stops and was very warm/watered down. I would also recommend bringing your own water bottle just in case. There were times i needed water or expected it at a major mile marker so I could take a GU but then there was no water stop. The whole race joy thing I guess was a disappointment. The idea was great&kudos to Providence for trying to get a tracking system. I know it didn't work..When I figured out that you had to carry your phone with you for real tracking and pay $1 for the service I opted out. The only tracking you get for free is the half marathon split which didn't work. The expo was very small.. seemed to be just thrown in the convention center in a random spot due to the event going on there that weekend. There is no real direction of what to do.. who has your bib.. etc.. But as I said this is a small marathon and I pretty much knew going into it this is what it would be like. With the hills and wind I still ran a BQ here which was my goal. The crowds at the finish line were fantastic.. the volunteers along the way were great. I didn't partake in the after party they had b/c my hotel was so close I decided to head there instead. The food was fine I thought.. i don't know what people expect at the end of a race? They have your typical banana's .. etc. I mean it's a race. There were food trucks there that you can get food from as well if you need more or want something different. In fact I loved that idea. Overall Providence was a decent experience. The course was nice, the crowd was nice. It is what it is.. it was a beautiful fun day.. crossing the finish line still feels the same as it does in a major marathon. I would consider it again. The positives outweighed the negatives for sure.
3.0

By: John Eng

Posted: May 08, 2014

Addendum - Nice Race

In addition to the review I just previously posted, I wanted to address some of the specific negative feedback that was posted about this race in order to give a more balanced and fair perspective to others considering this race. 1) 1 Sensor on Bib - I've run 33 marathons and most bibs have 1 sensor that I wore. Bottom line - Did your time get recorded? 2) 'No water from Mile 1 to 6' - That is simply not true. There was a water stop right before Mile 3 and another one right around Mile 4.5. How he/she missed those water stops I do not know but they were there. 3) To the person complaining about having to backtrack to get his/her medal after getting their heat wrap, the volunteers giving out the medal were literally stationed directly alongside the volunteers giving out heat wraps. 4)As far as the complaint that they didn't like the course 'because of the hills'...Why register and run it then? The elevation profile was on the website. 5) As far as complaining there were no vegetarian options at the finish line.. A race is an athletic event and shouldn't be considered a buffet experience catering to all possible dietary needs. If you have special dietary needs, then you should pack your own food in your bag. Just grab a banana, water and/or Gatorade and then head to baggage pickup. 6)As far as not 'being made to feel special' at the finish line because the volunteers handed them the medal instead of kissing them while putting the medal gloriously around their neck, you have to understand that these are volunteers. After how many hours of handing thousands of medals to the half marathoners and marathoners, they should be appreciated and thanked. They can't spend too much time on each individual to 'make them feel special' since that would cause a big backlog of people getting their medals. I make it a point to thank each and every volunteer. 7) As far as 'lack of spectators', I thought there were more than enough spectators. It really wouldn't bother me if there were no spectators but there seemed to be good pockets of them. Keep in mind that this race is in Providence RI and to even compare that to NYCM is simply not fair. I thought the spectators were great and saw lots of funny signs. 8) As far as the long lines for packet pick up race morning...Simple solution was to have picked it up either the day before or 2 days before. Not many races, especially marathons even have the race day pickup option so that should be considered a big plus rather than draw complaints. Besides my previous review, another nice positive aspect about the Providence Marathon was that the race photography pictures are free to all athletes! That's a big perk! I think the race has a lot going for it. The only reason I gave it 4 stars instead of 5 stars is that the water stations could be spaced out better but not sure how possible the logistics of doing that are.
4.0

By: Jonathan P.

Posted: May 07, 2014

Quiet and Scenic

Despite concerns from runners in previous years, it is 26.2, as advertised! The route is very scenic, don't expect much crowd support. There are a few hills, but if you train for hills, they are nothing to get excited about. My biggest takeaway is that the marathon is more on key with a quiet small town race. That is not a bad thing. Bib pickup was easy, the start/finish line area was easy to navigate and get where you needed to be, and there was sufficient amount of water stops along the route Be aware ahead of time though, do not expect a 'big city' race experience. If you do, you will be disappointed. If you expect lots of swag, food, water every mile, and thousands cheering you on, you will leave feeling disappointed.
3.0

By: John Eng

Posted: May 07, 2014

Nice Race, Pretty Course, Great Logistics

I'm a bit surprised at many of the negative comments below me. The course was very scenic, especially the last 8 miles or so. Unfortunately, the scenic parts also meant lots of headwinds! It's a bit hillier than expected but nothing terrible. It's a nice mix of bike trails, streets and ocean running that serves well to distract you at the right moments. One of the things I really liked about the race was the separate start of the full marathon from the half marathon. No crowding on the course and you knew the person next to you was in the same race. I found the spectators to be more than enough. They all had great signs, enthusiastic and you knew there were there to specially support the marathoners since it's a separate course. As far as the water stops, they were very well run and stocked by enthusiastic volunteers. As far as spacing of the water stops, the only noticeable one was the gap of approximately 3 miles from Mile 20. However, I knew this having looked at their course map so I was prepared and drank an extra cup at Mile 20. I've run quite a few marathons and this is one of the easiest logistics wise. I took a Greyhound bus from NYC. The bus station where I got off was literally across the street from the start which is literally a block away from the Providence Biltmore Hotel where I stayed at which is 1.5 blocks away from the expo. Tip: Even though the Biltmore didn't advertise it, they were giving late checkouts to the runners who asked for it. As far as the expo, it was pretty much in the halls of the convention center. Very easy. Just walk to the end to get your bib and shirt. There were a few vendors there selling all the basic necessities. Expo was efficient as it took me all of 2 minutes to get my bib and shirt and leave. Traffic control was smooth, efficient and friendly. Never had any issues or problems with worrying about traffic. The only time I was nervous was running on the bike path when the occasional cyclist would come barreling down around 20 mph thinking they are in the Tour De France and disregarding the safety of the runners. Obviously, this is not the Providence Marathon's fault. The finish line experience was fine. As soon as I finished there were volunteers with wraps and medals. I don't know how someone could have walked past them if they tried since they were literally about 20 feet from the finish. As far as food, they had bananas, water, gatorade, pinwheel sandwiches, free beer at the Skating Center and some assorted other choices. I'm not sure why there were so many complaints about this. I'm the biggest foodie there is but races aren't supposed to be Las Vegas style buffets. The variety and quantity of food was more than adequate. Trivia - Yahoo named Providence one of the top 10 food cities in the U.S. and I took advantage of it. Nice, small city! Had a fun time in the city as well as the race and have absolutely no reservations about recommending it to others.
4.0

By: Becky C.

Posted: May 06, 2014

Small-scale race with small-scale structure

I knew, going into this race, that it was not going to be the NYC Marathon experience I had last November. That said, there are a lot of things that could have been done differently, regardless of size. Pros: *The small field of runners meant shorter lines at the start line port-a-potties. *The runners at this race were SO FRIENDLY *The course was very scenic. I enjoyed seeing various neighborhoods, running along the water, going though downtown. Cons: *Water stops were inconsistent. At one point, it was almost 4 miles between water/aid stops. That's too far in a marathon. Other times, they'd appear a mile apart. *Regardless of what the website says, the first half of this race is HILLY. Be prepared. *Very few spectators. I think this is a con for most, although truth be told - it was a nice change of pace from NYC where you had people screaming at you every step of the way! :) But if you need crowd support to motivate you, this is not the race for you. *Finish line: Very lackluster experience. I had someone sort of shove a medal in my face. Did not make me feel special or like I just accomplished something. Then the food selection was bananas and small slices of meat-filled wraps. So for the vegetarians, just bananas. This worked out well for me to get a local spring marathon in, but I wouldn't do it again. Nor would I recommend it for any first-timers.
3.0

By: Annette T.

Posted: May 06, 2014

Loved this race - scenic plus easy logistically

Loved the course - very scenic; along water, through trees; on a bike path; some hills; pretty residential areas along the water. Super easy logistics. $2 bus from the airport (ask at Information Desk right before exiting the airport) - every half hour - right to downtown, which is right where start/finish is, Convention Center for packet pickup; and Omni, Biltmore, Courtyard. Biltmore gave 2:00 checkup. Couple water stations were kind of far apart. Volunteers were great.
4.0

By: Stephen T.

Posted: May 06, 2014

Not a bad marathon

The first half of the marathon is easier than the first. The second half seemed to b mainly up hill. Maybe I am wrong because it was just windy and I burned out.. But I think it was harder. My second half marathon slowed down by 10 minutes. First half was a 1:20.. Nice people in charge. Good race to test the waters of a marathon. I feel it sets the bar so a second one will make it easy to improve.
4.0

By: Michael J.

Posted: May 05, 2014

holy wind batman

There isn't really much to write about Providence. This race is low key, relatively small compared to other major cities, and mostly a residential and bike trail race. They got rid of the switchback that most people complained about and my GPS was pretty close to 26.2 at the end, but there were tons of turns so you really have to take the tangents or you will go long. The aid stations were still weird, they'd be really spread out and then two would be right on top of each other. I highly recommend bringing your own aid if you are a slower runner. My actual trouble with the course was the wind, which is out of their control. There were headwinds and crosswinds for a significant percentage of the course and it definitely demoralized me and other runners and slowed us down. I'm pretty sure the slower pace groups may have been behind. It was cheap, there were hotels within walking distance to the start/finish and you could sit and drink beer with your friends after a low key race. Its not bad if you need to knock RI off of your fifty states. And kudos to the race director for listening to previous year's feedback.
3.0

By: Sanjay A.

Posted: May 04, 2014

One of the worst organized marathons

I ran this course on 5/4/2014. The packet pickup was seamless but I noticed only one sensor on the bib. Typically, there are 2 sensors. I also noticed in the runner's booklet (pdf) that they wanted us to download and register the RaceJoy app for runner tracking. It's one of the worst app that I have used. Typically, in all the marathons I have run (this was my 7th), We get elegant instant messages at 10k, 20k, 30k, and finish line. The RaceJoy wants my family (each) to download the full app for 99 cents and wants me to carry my iPhone. How silly is that? Anyway, I started the run. There was water in mile market 1 (why?), then no water until mile marker 6 (wow). THen there was water at mile marker 6.5 and no water until mile marker 10. How silly is that? No one was manning the mile marker 3 water station. Why? The race proclaims that it's a flat course. This is a lie. It's quite hilly apparently but the race organizers wanted more entries and therefore they indicated that it's flat. There were more security (orange vests) privately owned, than there were volunteers. The crowd was very sparse as well. In the entire race, I don't think I saw more than 100 people gathered over the 26.2 mile course. Then it was windy - very windy. It was so windy that I ate dust and drank the ocean waves as it spat on our faces. Finally, at the finish, I received the medal and 1/4 chicken tortilla. When I asked for another 1/4 chicken tortilla, I was flatly refused. I was told that each runner gets one banana and one 1/4 chicken tortilla. The finish line festival was very sparse - so sparse that I hardly noticed others. I don't think I'll run this again.
2.0

By: Chris F.

Posted: May 04, 2014

I can cross RI off my list

Thank goodness this was marathon #10 for me. This would have been a horrible experience for a first timer. It was a not-so-great experience for me. THE BAD: Packet pickup: horrible. 6:15am on race morning, and there was zero energy. Quiet as a library. Volunteers were not directing racers as to which line (by race #) they should wait in, so several people waiting in the wrong line (thinking either line could accommodate any runner) were told to re-queue for the proper line. There was no signage either. Nobody told you where to find your race shirt - you just followed the crowd. When I got there (pre-registered for a small) all they had left were larges. Start was 10 minutes late. Race finish: I was wrapped in a heat sheet, and handed a bottle of warm water. No medal. I left the finish area, and asked another runner where to go for medals - he pointed back to the finish line. I had to go back into the finisher area where the current batch of tired runners were just crossing the finish line and ask for a medal. I was not directed to any food or other beverages. I helped myself to a second bottle of warm water, made an attempt looking for food and found a table with very tiny, very skimpy chicken wraps and bananas. I gave up and went back to my car which was well stocked with snacks. I learned that lesson after running NJ Marathon in 2010. RI Convention Center Parking Garage: advertised on the race materials as $10. Sign out front said $12. When I went to leave, I was told $13. I said 'What happened to $10?' The attendant said the website was wrong, but did charge me the $10. I did not like the course. I know that's personal preference, but I didn't care for all the hills. A great deal was also along water, and it was so very windy out on race day, that it actually felt like you were running *through* water in several areas. Course could have been marked better for the last 2 miles, but there were spectators to keep you on course. We ran through several quaint neighborhoods, and it was like the townsfolk were afraid of us. Very, very few people cheering from their homes, and I saw a few actually peeking out of their windows as if the streets were being unwelcomely invaded. THE GOOD: Plenty of port-a-potties at the start area. Many course marshals and police at all intersections. I never felt like traffic was an issue. Cars were always stopped in plenty of time for crossings. Tons of water stops with enthusiastic volunteers. There must have been enough port-a-potties on the course too, because there was rarely more than 1 person waiting. SUMMARY: I used this race to cross RI off my list, and it met that need. And also because I couldn't resist a race on Star Wars Day. May the fourth be with you.
2.0

By: James S.

Posted: May 04, 2014

Please remove the bikes!

While I understand part of the race takes place on the East Bay Bike Path, how about closing the path to bikes while the race in ongoing? Many of the cyclists are weekenders, therefore marginally able to handle their bikes in the midst of many runners. Therefore, they are unsafe. Promote runner and cyclist safety by closing the path to bikes during the race. Simple.
3.0

By: Shimone S.

Posted: October 06, 2013

Not terrible, but definitely room for improvement

This was my first full marathon. The following were positive attributes: 1. The police did a great job preventing traffic from entering the race course. 2. Plenty of standing room at the finish line for spectators. The following were areas for improvement: 1. Some of the mile markers were off; two in particular that I remember were in the late teens and early 20s. I was moving pretty even-paced at just under 8 min/mile and I remember my consecutive splits being around 6:30 and 9. 2. The volunteers handing out water filled it to the brim, making it difficult to drink and making it splash easily. I have volunteered at 5 marathons giving out water, and one of the first things we're told is slightly less than halfway filled. 3. The finish food was nasty. Typically, after long distances, I can eat anything. However, I actually ate 1/4 of a bagel and threw the rest out because it was so inedible. 4. Not the most picturesque marathon; there were parts that were ok, but the good majority of it is run in ugly, gray suburbs.
2.0

By: Steve I.

Posted: May 27, 2013

Wrong distance, technically an ultra

The mile markers were way off at points. The 14 mile marker was off by .25 miles. I was running with a pack of runners and all our Garmins, Polars, GPS watches were reading similarlythe mile markers were long. By the finish line the course was almost .4 longfour-tenths of a mile long!!! That is ridiculous! I couldn't believe it. But sure enough, everyone I asked afterward ad the same results... 26.5-26.6 long. Just for kicks, I plugged the course into mapmyrun.com and guess what? 26.6 The race directors need to get their acts together. It is utterly ridiculous that they'd make a long course. FYI: in case you're skeptical because it lists itself as a 'USATF certified' course, consider that the distance it self-reported. A USATF official isn't out there measuring it. The organizers report the distance. Anything longer than 26.2x is an ultra marathon. So congrats to all the finishers... We all just ran an ultra. Sucks for all of us who missed our Boston qualifying time because of the long course.
3.0

By: Jack T.

Posted: May 21, 2013

An Emotional Marathon Experience

Ran this marathon as a relatively last minute decision and signed up the day of the Boston Marathon, after the bombings. Got family in SE Massachusetts and came up from Georgia wanting to reconnect with my blood family and my running family in New England with BQ hopes. Well about the race, Race packet pickup was a breeze with plenty of parking in and around Providence Place both during the packet pickup and during the Marathon. I was able to get in or out without any problems. The Omni hotel was a great choice for the expo and pre-race gathering venue with ample restroom availability bewteen the hotel and porta-potties outside was fine. The pre-race organization effort was terrific, no coral issues and a phenominal and very moving National Anthem. The tone was emotional with this being the first major Boston area Marathon since the bombings. Police presence was just right, enough to promote feeling safe but not too much like you're in a police state. The officers were also very friendly and genuinely supportive of the event and it's runners. Post race food and beverages were plentiful and well attended to. They roped off a pretty good size courtyard area where you got your massages( as I believe, I didnt get one) and your complimentary Naragansett Beer which was a treat as I can't get them in GA. The course itself was a unique blend of suburban and metropolitan settings which made it cool. You started off in downtown Providence then made you way out to Barrington via Veterans Memorial Parkway. Right from the start, it appeared that the first few mile markers were wrong and I shrugged it off but then became concerned as others were off too. I ran with the runners hope that it will all work itself out in the end with the finsih line at 26.2x. Well the course in the first 10k took you over some decent hills that fresh legs could tackle easily and then out to Barrington where the course took you out to a point/penninsula with some nice ocean/bay views. The city felt far removed. Coming back out and away from the point, the course went for several miles along a relativley flat long section of wooded bike paths that I liked. Soon after that, you were making your way back to the city as you were reminded with some super Providence Skyline views from about 7-8 miles out which I found surreal with the thought that we are actually running to the city way off in the horizion. Several miles of this were on the bike path right on the river which was cool. Had Water and City Skyline views, best of both worlds. Was brought back to earth soon after that as you hit those hills that were no problem in the beginning with fresh legs but menacing on the back 10k. Additionally there was a short, steep hill around mile 23 or so that forced me to walk for a few seconds but per my Nike+ sport watch was good to go pace wise for qualifying for Boston. Soon after this hill you were entering downtown and my watch was around 25.0 with no sight of the finish line. I continued to run with hopes that the next left would reveal the finish line but it didn't and my watch showed 26.22 before taking that left. After making that turn, sprinted like hell when the finsih line was visible. When I finished the race, my watch said 26.45 and the official time was 3:25:05, I missed my Boston Qualifier by 5 seconds! This is my biggest complaint on the course, the Marathon needs to be at 26.2x or dont have one. The distance needs to be right and the mile marks also need to be right. I cut every possible corner and ran every possible tangent. The Course Distance Needs To Be Correct And The Mile Markers Need To Be Right! I spoke with nearly a dozen runners after the race and they confirmed my assessment. Look, they also only fielded a fraction more 13% Boston Qualifiers, it was the long course distance that did many of us in, not the hills, its a net zero gain, and not the weather as it was cool, overcast and a bit drizzley at race start. I think that the race organizers did have their act together and other than the markers and course distance, they got everything else right and sponsored a good race. There was were more GU and water stops there than any marathon I ever ran before. Spectators were great and so was law enforcement. Last thing I think needs fixing is the course distance and mile marker accuracy! Remember, Marathoners train for months for a particular race and its the race sponsors duty to them to get the course distance right! By the way, I BQd the following weekend, 5/19/13 at the Poconos Run for the Red Cross at 3:23:40 for a course 26.26 miles long per my watch and their official time. I would run the Providence race again more as a casual training run, if I'm home in Mass at the time but would not activley seek it out as a BQ race until they fixed the mile markers and the course length problem.
4.0

By: Ismael F.

Posted: May 19, 2013

Good Race, just not PR friendly

This was my marathon #6 and I think it was a nice race. I read the comments from previous years, and I think there were improvements. I think it was a well organized event starting at the expo (even though my bib# vanished and I got a new number), and during the race. The water stations were fine and there were plenty of gels. Nice people all around! My only complaint is that I was ready to PR and could not (I was looking for a 3:30). I found the course quite hilly and I am person who runs on hills. I cramped up on mile 19 and I think it was because I went too fast on the downhills of the beginning of the course. I was not expecting to see more hills, but one more at mile 25 as I was told. Not the case!! So, take the advertisement literally...it is 'relatively' flat. Still, this is a marathon I would recommend.
4.0

By: Jeff K.

Posted: May 19, 2013

Decent small-city marathon with some problems

I signed up three weeks before the race when I realized I'd be in Providence anyways. Parking / finding expo. Easy, even on race morning. Packet pick-up. Easy, breezed through on race morning. They only had large t-shirts left (I know I indicated small online). Very basic shirt anyways. Pre-race. Easy gear check. Plenty of port-a-potties. I don't recall seeing water, but I wasn't looking for it. Race started about 15 minutes late. Course. Mile markers sometimes off +/- .2 miles. After a couple, I began relying on my garmin more than the course markers. At the end of the race, my garmin said 26.36 miles (I heard some other people saying they also got a bit over 26.2). Overall scenic course, pleasant. Some spots a bit tight between shoulder and on-road traffic but plenty of room for most of course. Aid stations. Oddly spaced and not enough of them. Plenty of water, gatorade, and gu at the stations they had. But stations should be longer, especially gu needs to be at least 150 feet before water. Not enough warning when a station was coming up. I bring my own honey stinger chomps for food (sugar in the gu messes up my GI tract), and like to eat them right before an aid station so I can drink water. Volunteers were very pleasant, but could have been better trained to hold water cups from bottom of cup, spread out a little more, shout at us what they're holding. Overall - some organizational problems, not a race I would set out to repeat but not one I would necessarily avoid either. Decent small-city marathon, could be improved with more accurate mile markers and more consistent aid stations.
4.0

By: Cortney H.

Posted: May 19, 2013

Challenging course but fun overall

First off, I came up with friends and we stayed at the Biltmore, which I highly recommend. It was super cheap and they let us have a late checkout for free, so we could shower and chill after the race. The start is also right outside the front of the hotel. Course is not easy, with some significant hills, especially towards the end. It is very pretty on the bike path and back in the neighborhoods. Water stations were well stocked and the spectators were pretty nice.
4.0

By: Jason M.

Posted: May 13, 2013

Lots of nice people

I stayed at the Omni (host hotel). Got almost zero sleep the night before the marathon, thanks to tons of drunk and drama filled high school students going crazy most of the night. Hotel security tried some, but... The logistics of the race were very easy. The start/finish and expo are all within a couple block area. So it was an easy walk from the hotel. The course was decent enough. There was lots of Gu on the course. Fluids were in large cups like most marathons and filled with the right amount of fluids. I thought there should be been another fluid station or two, but maybe that is just me. I met a lot of nice runners on the course and volunteers. The shirt was nice, the medal was nice. It has a small town race feel to it. Not sure what the past years were like, but based on some past comments on here, 2013 was better. I have no complaints, other than the hotel based on the drunk kids.
3.0

By: Paul Mezick

Posted: May 13, 2013

Not what I had expected

I'm a novice marathoner, having made this race my 5th overall and my 4th on the road. I've done a half dozen 70.3 triathlons, and quite a few half marathons. I know what a good venue looks like. Parking was easy and finding the event was easy. However, I didn't feel like the course was as advertised. I think there was a change in the 2013 course due to bridge construction placing a nice climb at mile 6. In fact, i thought the course was rather undulating, especially on the return from 23 to 26. I think the mile markers were off too. Some miles seemed very long, and I think I was duped into starting off too strong. I blew up later on in the race. But, I can only blame myself for that - more a nutritional error than mile markers being a bit off. But, there is that psychological piece you get from splits. I could have used some salt along the course. Maybe some sugar or flat coke?? Candy?? Sucks because I've begun to rely on the course for my nutrition instead of lugging it with me. The aid stations seemed oddly spaced. I'm so used to triathlons where the aid stations are at every mile, or at least, every other mile. Only large T-shirts were available.I was a bit bummed about that since most 5'11', in-shape guys swim in a large shirt. I'm pretty sure Active.com asked me my shirt size. I don't think this would be my 'go to' Boston qualifying race. Too bad too because I need a good spring race. I am still a big fan of the ING Hartford marathon. They seemed to have their act together - just saying my two cents.
2.0

By: Dan B.

Posted: May 12, 2013

Much better in 2013!

Well the race organizers finally listened to the feedback and made some changes for the better. The course is much improved with elimination of the infamous bridge and switchback ramp! Water stops are still oddly spaced, especially on the bike path stretch from 18 - 21. Found aid stations were well stocked...multiples with Gu and almost all had Gatorade (at least for the front of the pack). Bottom line is the course is now much flatter, especially the 2nd half. Some rolling hills, but nothing too nasty. Just missed a PR. Still some issues in the last two miles where the half and full join up...faster marathoners are weaving through and dodging the half marathon pack. Medal nice...shirt OK. Plenty of food and drink post race. Much improved...and a much better BQ course than years past.
4.0

By: Ed L.

Posted: May 24, 2012

DO NOT RUN THIS!!!!

Take all the warnings of the race seriously. I ran this only because I did not do Boston because of the heat and did not want to waste the winter training base I established. I finished in just over 3 hours and never saw any bananas or gu. Like others said the cups were smaller than shot glasses, lucky for me I carried my own water since I read previous race comments. The shirt stinks and it is more like cotton then the dry-tek fabric advertised. The medal was the best thing about the race. Not one mile split was accurate and mile 25 was a half mile long. My gps has been pretty close to every race I race since I got it but at the end of the marathon it said 26.59 and I cut every tanget as possible. I was 3 minutes ahead of my previous marathon time at mile 26 but yet it took me over 4 minutes to run the last .2 of this course. Went from 7 min pace to 12 min pace over the last quarter is impossible for anyone unless they walk. Mile 25 of the marathon was after mile 12 of the Half. Shouldn't it be pretty close together? The water stops were very spread out at times over 2.5-3 miles apart, and Port-a-Johns were not at every stop like adverised. 2-3 years now they have run out of water, cups or food on the course. The course is not to hilly and the bridge at mile 25 would be an awful experience if you were in a pack, lucky for me I was with 1-2 others. There is no room to pass there, especially with walkers and bikers coming at you. The switchback kills any momentum that you have. There was a 360 degree turn around mile 9 too. Spectators were there at the water stops but not anywhere else. The police did a good job at managing traffic and the course was marked well. If you need a RI race to get your 50 states in come back in the fall and run the one in Newport. It has to be better than this. This race is not for serious marathoners!
1.0

By: Carol M.

Posted: May 21, 2012

Easy to do but some details need to be fixed

This was my 10th marathon and 4th Providence (I also did the half one year). Unfortunately, this race seems to consistenly suffer from some of the same issues at aid stations. The volunteers are great, but you can't run out of water or cups! This happened the first year, too, and that should have been 1 time too many for the organizers. Additionally, the tee shirt is a perk. I understand they are expensiveand so is the race entry. Please, please upgrade your shirts. I haven't work it yet. The best shirt was the long sleeve black one from three years ago. Go back to that design (SS would be ok) and fabric. The white ones this year just didn't cut it. The medal was awesome, but like other comments I read, I'd rather have a smaller medal and have liquids on the course. There was a lot of Gu...if you could find it. volunteers probably weren't trained that they needed to be handed out. I was at one station and I saw boxes of them and I had to ask for one...they were on the ground behind water bottles. I thank all of the organizers for doing this race along with all of the volunteers, police and spectators. I'm willing to pay $100 to run it, but please check out some of the comments. And yes...mile markers were way off. I knew the course and heard the bike path was closed...I am suspicious how we started and finished at the same place as prior years, were re-routed around the bike path...and still supposed to have 26.2 miles. I really think the course was long this year. That also just can't happen again.
3.0

By: Steve Bratt

Posted: May 13, 2012

Lots of potential. Mile markers gone wrong.

Had an fair run at the Providence Cox Sport Marathon in Rhode Island, 2012. I should not have been surprised at the large number Boston registrants (me included), who were in Providence this year. The course is a pretty quiet, nearly out and back trek, with some scenic views of the bay, golf courses, and park lands. Rolling hills in miles 2-8 and 17-25 (which are across the same stretch of road). My major complaint was that the mile markers were a mess. Some were off by 0.2-0.5 miles. So, I had mile splits ranging from 6:20 to 11:44 (yes, mile 20 came up 11:44 on my watch!). See details below (#). I missed going under 3:30 because I got lulled into thinking my pace between 15 and 20 miles was under 8 min/mile when it was probably a bit too slow. I ran the last miles in 7:45-ish, but could not make up the time. I just hope the overall distance was correct.... It looks like they lengthened a section of the course relative to past years, and hope they shortened it elsewhere. Other things they could easily fix are at the water stops& for example: - be consistent about whether water or GatorAid is at the first tables, - when there is Gu, give it out at least 100 meters before the water table to give people time to consume the Gu before drinking the water, - use larger cups & may seem like a waste, but I and others often had to grab two or three cups to get the liquids needed. # Here are my rough, rounded splits (mile, then pace) at the markers: 1 7:29 2 8:04 3 9:38* (co-runner said this was 0.2 miles late) 4 6:11* 5 8:12 (39:33 for 1st 5 miles) 6 7:32 7 9:01* 8 7:48 9 8:02 10 8:01 (roughly 40:25ish for 2nd 5 miles) 11 7:50 12 7:50 13 8:20 (1:43:28 for 1/2 marathon) 14 9:29* 15 6:31* (40:00ish for 3rd 5 miles) 16 8:20 17 8:05 18 7:35 19 7:04* 20 11:45* (42:45ish for 4th 5 miles)* 21 8:45* 22 7:48 23 8:10 24 7:46 25 7:55 (40:30ish for 5th 5 miles) 26 7:40 * splits and presumably mile markers that are way off The 20 mile marker and time was the shocker.
2.0

By: Linda T.

Posted: May 13, 2012

Disappointing tshirt, mis-marked miles

While a shirt doesn't make or break the race... this one was blah. Doubt that I will wear it. I was surprised that so many of the mile markers weren't in the correct place... some miles were short others were long. Thought the course would have been prettier... didn't feel safe at times with cars right next to you. Thought that the police officers working the course were the NICEST of any of the 60 marathons that I have run! A few stations ran out of cups but that has happened before and by the end there were cups again. The medal was very nice. The food at the finish great. Very attentive personnel at the finish making sure the runners were doing okay. Coming from western NC, I didn't think the course was that hilly except for two particular hills and the small, short mean one at the end.
3.0

By: Tim L.

Posted: May 13, 2012

Good Mid-Size Marathon

Course: Only about 5 miles of the course are in Providence. Most of it is outside of town on nice bike paths and neighborhoods. Most of the hills are in the first six miles. However, there are a few hills in miles 23 and 24. Two big issues though: On mile 25, there is a bridge crossing where we had to use the pedestrian lane which was still open to cyclists and other foot traffic. At the end of the bridge, we had to go down the corkscrew. Also, some of the mile markers were way off! I would recommend a GPS watch for this race. Organization: Easy registration process. I registered day off. Two of the aid stations between miles 15-20 ran out of cups. The volunteers were great and poured water and gatorade into our mouths. Plenty of GU along the course. Spectators: There weren't that many spectators on the course. Since the course was open to traffic along most parts, those few spectators that were out traveled around and cheered us on at multiple spots. Motivation: A group of High School students ran the marathon and there were a lot of 50 staters.
3.0

By: Greg B.

Posted: May 10, 2012

Great city with alot to do!!

My first marathon and it was a lot of fun. Course was flat, well marked, plenty of fluids and GU. Finish was not good having to cross a very thin pedestrian bridge. Also, my GPS is pretty accurate and according to it I ran 26.4???. Should have different shirts for full vs half.
4.0

By: Bridget M.

Posted: May 10, 2012

Great PR course, bad confluence of races at mile 2

Hi, I loved this race. The conditions were ideal, the course was fast. My only complaint relates to the final two miles of the race. After crossing a narrow foot bridge and negotiating an awkward ramp, the marathon suddenly merged with the BACK end of the half marathon. There were slower runners clustering around the aid stations and running three or four abreast. Because the faster marathoners were coming from behind, the onus was on these runners to weave and at points break through lines of slower runners. There was a single finishing shoot. Runners competing for place could not get a visual lock on the marathoners in front of them. A spectator told me he had trouble identifying the winning marathoners at the finish line, as they were lost in the crowd. This is sad. The second and third male and female runners were barely announced, and the overall winning male came in amongst other runners. The overall winning male should have had the glory of coming down an empty shoot, ALONE and highly visible. For that reason, I believe the half marathon should enter the city from a different direction and come down a separate shoot. I mean no disrespect to the slower half marathon finishers, but people working hard for 26 miles and gutting it out for time and place shouldn't have to weave in the final mile and they should be recognized for their efforts.
4.0

By: Matthew C.

Posted: May 10, 2012

A Nice Mid-Size Race

The race was 'mostly flat' especially in the middle stages of race. The hills on mile 21-23 the same as miles 6.5-8.5 were brutal and took out a lot of runners. The original map avoided some of these steep hills, but the revised course put out just prior to to the race added these hills in. The course was pretty scenic at points with some great views of the ocean in Barrington. The worst part of the course was the highway bridge on mile 24 which was quite narrow and had a difficult to traverse exit ramp that was not kind to my already tired legs. I have to agree with the previous comments about running into the slower half marathoners at the end. However, I greatly appreciated having a separate start time and course from the half crowd Spectators were thinly spread out, but great. If you have family members at the race, it is very easy for them to drive along and catch you at various points along the race. Food was plentiful at the finish line and included everything a runner could possibly want from Greek Yogurt to Pizza. Packet pickup was easy and accommodating (they actually allowed for same day pickup) a rarity these days. There weren't a ton of vendors, but they had everything that one could ask for
4.0

By: Jim R.

Posted: May 09, 2012

Room to improve, but so much to like.

Providence was a great example of what could be an outstanding marathon. It's got a ways to go, but despite a few cons, there are so many pros that it's my kind of race. This was state 13, marathon 16, and I'd do this one again. What worked: 1. Good variety of course: Providence isn't huge, so most of the course is outside the city. That's a plus for avoiding bleak post-industrial areas and heading into older suburban areas. You get some city, some 19th century burbs, some rural country roads, some rail trail. 2. Good aid stations- I've never seen so many stations with GU. Nice. 3. Cool, cloudy weather- o.k., that could vary, but the ocean and fog kept the temperature cool. You don't get much of that in May. 4. Easy viewing spots for family around the halfway point in Barrington. 5. Hey, except for the mile 5/23 hill, this is very flat. Gentle rollers and railroad grades with long flat stretches over most of the course. 6. I had good competition. Lots of BQ's here for all the reasons above. Runners I encountered were seasoned, knew their 'runner's etiquette', and relaxed... and fast. What needs work: 1. The mile markers were off- some long, some short. Most of us have GPS watches, so no big deal, but how hard is it to place these correctly? 2. The course runs along a busy road from mile 5-9 and 20-24. The cones were out, but more police/volunteers would have helped. 3. The 'Runner's Village' area came together about an hour before the race. Volunteers seemed unsure of where to locate the bag drop and other basics. I PR'd here by over three minutes- and I've been doing marathons since 2000. Overlook the flaws and check this one out.
4.0

By: Lisa G.

Posted: May 09, 2012

Bare Bones Well Organized

Agree with all the comments...the mile markers were very screwed up. I was glad to be wearing my Garmin. The cups were gone at most of the water stops by the time we came through and the single file bridge coupled with the switch back running/off ramp definitely slowed me down. Don't be fooled, there are hills in the last six miles of this course. Also roads are open to traffic which had us stopped twice along the course for cars to pass. Great pizza and beer post race!
3.0

By: Rob F.

Posted: May 09, 2012

A few tweaks could make this a better race overall

I have run over 100 marathons and have therefore seen a few courses; first time here. The course: fair and reasonably fast, no monster hills. Some complain about the 'switchback' ramp as you descend from the bridge around mile 25 - would not do in a 'world-class' marathon but not an issue for a race where 2.28 is good enough to win men's division Distance markers: all over the place as others have noted. I took an hour for the last 6.2 miles yet ran the 'mile' from 25 to 26 in barely five minutes! Needs to be fixed for 2013. Aid stations: Two stretches of three miles between stations in the first ten miles, after that more frequent and not a problem. First ten would have been a big problem on a day like Boston was this year. The website said some stations would have bananas, which I like, but I never saw any the whole way. Crowds: Supportive but thin most of the way. The question is does one want a more scenic 'country marathon' which this really is, or one that traverses downtown and suburbs where you will see more spectators.
3.0

By: Neil L.

Posted: May 09, 2012

Average

The Good: The start was really well organized and went off on time without a hitch. The end had a nice supply of gatorade, pizza, apples, beer etc. Volunteers were great and water stops were adequately manned. Not a lot of crowd support. but those that were there did a nice job. The not so good: Splits were all over the place. This is unacceptable. Mile markers were anywhere from 0.8 to 1.2 and it seemed more were off than were accurate. Cups used were dixie cupes which half the time had maybe 2 oz of water or gatorade and were hard to pinch and drink. Also, contrary to what others say, this is not a PR course. It has a lot of turns and has hills the first 5-6 miles and then the last 4 or so have some hills as well. Additionally, the one lane path followed by the narrow switchback at mile 25 is just plain ridiculous. Finally, I didn't particulary enjoy passing/avoiding the 2:30 half marathoners finishing their race when the marathon course merged with them somewhere near mile 12. All in all a decent race with much room for improvement. Probably wouldn't run it again.
3.0

By: George S.

Posted: May 09, 2012

Nothing to write home about

This was a nice race. The course was diverse and quirky; relatively interesting except for the long stretches along a busy road. Definitely not flat. Would have been nice to see more of Providence itself, but running through Barrington was pretty. Glad it was a cloudy day as it would have been brutal in full sun. Organization was good with one fatal flaw: Running out of cups at the water stations - which must have happened pretty early because even those of us under a 4 hr pace were left dry.(Thank God an unknown spectator handed me a water bottle mid-mile 18...) Liked the fact that start/finish and expo/hotels were all in same area. Very convenient for out of towners. Loved the medal, not the shirt. All in all a decent event, worth doing to cross RI off the list, but nothing to write home about.
3.0

By: Jen B.

Posted: May 09, 2012

Poorly organized

This was my 10th marathon. I have run races of many sizes, including very large and very small races. Most of them very well runthis one, not so much. For starters, I was surprised to not find any race day info at the expo particularly a map. I inquired at the hotel where I was staying (the host hotel) and they weren't even certain where the start was. I found it easily enough as several other runners were heading in the same direction, but I like the comfort of having the info in front of me the night before. Once I got there, I found it to be kind of a maze, trying to find bag check and the starting area. The sound system in the start area didn't even reach the bag check area, and I nearly missed the start of the race. Once I got started, I found that the mile markers were completely inaccurate. This was really frustrating, since I couldn't accurately figure out what my pace was. Water stops were a disaster. The cups at most stops were tiny and most people had to take more than one, Later in the race, several stops ran out of cups so I had to choose to either go without water, or drink from the jug. I actually saw volunteers picking up used cups off the ground to reuse. Gross! I am about a 4 hour marathoner, and there is no way that cups should have been an issue. I also was counting on Gatorade at some of the stops, only to discover that they had run out. The shirts are ok. I don't know why more races don't do a men's and a women's shirt. I took an extra small and it's still too big. I doubt I'll ever wear it. The course was nice in spots, downright ugly in others. I found it to be fairly hilly at the beginning and end, but I knew that going in. Overall, I'd say they have a lot of areas in which they could improve. I only live a couple hours away, but have no desire to ever run this race again.
3.0

By: Lisa G.

Posted: May 08, 2012

Great experience!

I was hesitant to run due to prior negative comments but had a great experience! The race as well as the city of Providence made for a nice weekend. Pros: Scenic course with some rolling hills- not flat but not terrible. Well organized. Small but sufficient expo. Enthusiastic spectators and volunteers. Great medal. Tons of food at the end, including pizza, Greek yogurt, bagels, and fruit. Tech shirt. Easy logistics with lots of hotels close to start / finish area and expo. Cons: They can out of cups at 2 aid stations and gatorade towards the end of the race. Overall, the race was a good experience and was worth it in my 50 states quest. I also would like to mention that everyone I met from Providence was very friendly and there were lots of good restaurants. I would return in the future!
5.0

By: Tim L.

Posted: May 08, 2012

Good Mid-Size Race

Course: Nice course. Part of it is on bike paths which were nice and flat. Although it is billed as being flat, there are some hills. Most are in the first six miles. Only about 4 or 5 miles are in Providence then the rest is outside of town. Course is open to traffic in some parts but there is plenty of police coverage. Two big issues though: the mile markers were in the wrong spots (3 and 25 were way off) and on Mile 25 there is a bridge that you cross to get back to Providence. The race goes along the pedestrian path which is narrow and there were walkers and cyclists also on the path. After the bridge is crossed, the course goes along the ramp to get back down to the street. I heard that in years past you had to climb stairs to get to the bridge so this is an improvement over years past. Organization: This was an easy race to register for. I signed up on race day! The water stations at miles 15 and 18 ran out of cups! However, the volunteers were great and poured water and gatorade into our mouths. Team in Training had the water station at Mile 25 and had motivation signs along the bike path. Plenty of gatorade and GU along the course. I think there were bananas at one station. Post race there was plenty of water and gatorade, pizza, and best of all Beer! Motivation: There was a team of High School kids that competed in the Marathon (Dreamfar). Some were as young as 15 and all finished! Also, there were a lot of 50 staters in this race. Spectators: While there were not too many, the ones that were out there did a great job. Because the race was not closed to traffic, the spectators were able to cheer on their friends and family at different points in the race which was nice. There was no official entertainment on the course. One of the residents whose house we passed blasted music and was outside cheering us on. Apparently he does this every year. This is a good Spring Marathon and very easy to sign up for so I would recommend it as an alternative to Boston. I would like to see the course modified so that we have a travel lane on the bridge. However, for the cost and accessibility this race was great.
3.0

By: Mark F.

Posted: May 08, 2012

mile markers extremely inaccurate

Ran this race in an attempt to qualify for Boston (and DID!) but have to say that the mile markers were extremely inaccurate (by my conservative estimate 10 of the 26 markers were off). Makes it really hard to run a consistent pace when you aren't sure if you're running too fast or too slow. For example one mile would be 8:30, the next would be 5:30, yet my average was a tick over 7 min per mile and I ran very consistent effort-wise pace. For the record I did NOT have a GPS watch but knew I was running a fairly even pace simply by feel. Thankfully I was well enough trained to compensate for the inaccuracies. The overall on-course support was excellent. Aid stations were fairly evenly placed and volunteers were helpful. Parts of the course were absolutely beautiful, other parts more challenging. Due to bike path construction a later portion of the course had to be re-routed into a much hillier section which made miles 20-23 much more challenging (hopefully shouldn't be a problem for future races since this was likely only a diversion for this year's race). Mile 24 running across the interstate-195 bridge was also challenging (very narrow, no room to pass; plus dealing with regular foot traffic was difficult, and then the down-ramp at the end with hairpin turns wasn't very fun after running 24 miles!). Overall it was a well organized event but the course was challenging mentally.
3.0

By: Andy R.

Posted: May 07, 2012

decent mid-size Spring race

This was a nice mid-size Spring race. Very well organized, decent expo. Everything went off on time. Lots of aid stations and volunteers with water, gatorade, and tons of GU. The course was a little hillier than expected, but nothing really bad - just a long mile long steady uphill at mile 21. My only real complaint was the mile markers were off all race long. I'd have a 5:50 mile, then an 8:20 mile, then a 7:20 mile. I was probably the only person without a Garmin, but I'd rather have no mile markers than incorrect ones. I never knew if I was going too fast, too slow, etc. I'd rather have not known and could've run by feel, but I couldn't make myself ignore the signs because I was trying to run an exact pace and while I felt like I was running at that pace, seeing markers at 6 min, or at 8:30, made me scond guess my pacing. Other than that one issue, everything was fine. Nothing memorable, but nothing bad.
4.0

By: Todd P.

Posted: May 07, 2012

Medium-hilly Marathon with ok support and org

Only applies to 2012: Despite posting in numerous places that the course would be the same this year, closure of the bike path in one section forced organizers to route the course back over the biggest hill in the race to get to the finish. That hill really hurts 21 miles in. The course is generally good, it's pretty flat from 6 to 20 and was well signed/coned for the most part. Mile markers were a complete joke, with some as far as 0.5 miles off. Some water stops had only TINY water cups, forcing you to try to grab two or three to get enough water. Water stops were generally well staffed. I think everyone else here has said this, but man that bridge at the end is rough. Bikers were coming the other way and I had to wait to make a pass. Switchbacks aren't great, but at least they're wide enough to pass slower runners. There was a large (100+?) group of run/walkers in orange shirts who were allowed to start the race early and were often lined up 3-4 wide when you had to pass them (and stole some tangents). I was scared I was going to come up behind them on the final narrow bridge, but luckily that didn't happen. Spectators were a little sparse, but good for a race this size. Lots near the end. This race was OK, but could be great with a little more care and planning. They really have got to find another way over the river at the end - the narrow bridge and switchback could easily set you back a minute or more with the wrong set of circumstances.
3.0

By: Erica C.

Posted: May 07, 2012

Not my favorite

I always take it as a bad organizational omen when you have you have to look up your own bib number to pick up your race packet and this race was no exception. Packet pickup went smoothly and even on Saturday afternoon there was no line. Expo was very, very small, with only the bare necessities, which is fine with me. They did have a baggage drop-off at the start, which is always a nice perk. I did not however take advantage of it. I never found the port-a-potties at the start, but that was probably my fault. There were two at the first mile marker, which didn't nearly support the number of runners veering off to use them. Most of us ended up watering the nearby bushes. At the start pace corral signs were not hung high enough to read over the runners. They were so low that I didn't even realize they were there until the race had already started, even though I had been looking for them. Fortunately, the race was so small it didn't really matter. I have no idea what was going on with the mile markers - it's not clear that any of them were even remotely accurate. Many were a quarter mile or more off. There was a dearth of water stops, and the water was dispensed in the tiniest cups possible - that is, if there were cups. I usually took two and was still thirsty. In fact, I spent most of the race thirsty. I hit the 15 mile water stop solidly the middle of the pack and they were already out of cups. I was not having a good race and I dropped to the back of the pack after that, and many of further water stops were also out of cups. I can't imagine what kind of disaster this would have been had the weather actually been hot. If I ran this race again (I can't imagine why I would), I would bring my own water bottle. There did appear to be plenty of Gu and bananas though. There aren't many spectators, although there were a few very clever ones. This is also fine with me. The course is just okay. In some areas it's quite nice, with pretty water views, or over a nice quiet bike path, but it does go through some rather industrial parts of the city. Traffic over most of the course is not closed off. Toward the end you are required to go over a bridge in single file and then take a back-and-forth ramp down to the ground. The medal is the nicest I've ever seen. Unfortunately, medals are useless and I wish they'd spent that time and effort on the t-shirt, which is pretty unattractive. They do get points for offering an XS shirt though, and it is a tech shirt, so that's nice. In short: Pretty medal, mediocre course, questionable organization, and drab tech shirt
3.0

By: Adam Stevens

Posted: May 07, 2012

Decent organization, poor course and markers

I ran this course 5/6/12 in efforts for a BQ. This course is not condusive to serious runners. The course consisted of 16 miles or so of road running, and the rest was run along a bike path. At mile 24 it was a single track bike path, with no room to pass with on-coming bike traffic to dodge. If thats not bad enough, you need to zig-zag down a 5 level ramp to get to ground level making 180 degree turns at every corner. The mile markers were not well placed, and the course was long. On average the peopole I interacted with all have .35-.50 miles too long. Would be a good course for a rec runner or for fun, but do yourself a favor and go somewhere else if you want to BQ or run a serious road race!
3.0

By: Myriam Loor

Posted: May 06, 2012

not enough aid stations for humid conditions

Good course, probably a PR type of course under good conditions which are difficult to have when the race starts at 7:30 when the humidity is at its highest. Well staffed fluid stations with very friend volunteers but very spaced apart (one about 3 miles apart) Aid stations ran out of cups at mile 14 and out of Gatorade by 16. Very humid day to go without water or Gatorade that long, thank God for volunteers who set up water tables. Either the organizers made a mistake in their cup calculation or the humidity took them by surprise. Either way, at some point they should have sent a new supply to replenish the stations.
3.0

By: Julia C.

Posted: May 06, 2012

Great course, well organized

I chose this race as my first marathon because I have family in Providence. After reading other comments on this site, I was hesitant about the hills, lack of water, and disorganization at the finish. I found that the course was had a few hills at the start and end, but nothing too intense. The course was beautiful, with great views of the water and on quiet streets. There were plenty of water stops with Gu as well, the race was very well staffed and started promptly, and while the crowds were very thin for the majority of the race, those that did come out were enthusiastic. A fast course, I would definitely return.
3.0

By: Chris S.

Posted: May 06, 2012

Fast course, mile markers all over the place

I ran the inaugural race in 2008 and liked it then, and since then they have eliminated some of the boring stretches. It's an average course overall. Fairly flat. A few hills here and there to change up your stride, but nothing killer. The amazing thing was how far off the mile markers were. Sometimes it would be .8 miles between, sometimes 1.2 or 1.3. Unless you run with a GPS you would have no idea how far along you were. The aid stations were well-stocked. Some with Gu, most with water AND Gatorade. Some aid stations you had to serve yourself off the table. They fixed the problem with the medals now being race-specific, and very nicely done by the way. They have NOT fixed the issue with the shirts being non-race -specific, but, small detail. The best improvement was in making the full start 30 minutes before the half. However, if you run under about 3:45 you'll share the last two miles of narrow bike paths and roads with some of the slower half-marathoners. Running 2:48 I had to do a lot of dodging and weaving and the speed differential between me and the halfers was enough to make it a bit hazardous. One other complaint: You all finish in the same chute so there is a lot of congestion for the faster marathon finishers. Tons of food was available at the finish. Bay State Race Services put the results up fast. It's easy to stay in a hotel right at the start-finish. Overall a great mid-sized race if you're from New England but probably not a destination race unless you're a fifty-stater; and then I'd recommend the Gansett Marathon in mid-April for a better course...if you have a qualifying time.
4.0

By: Jennifer E.

Posted: December 12, 2011

Ok race, but the course needs to change

The race is advertised as fast and flat, though I think that's stretching the truth a bit. There definitely are some hills throughout the course, along with a couple short steep ones at mile 23 and 25. Right after the mile 25 hill is a stretch of single track over a bridge, which was congested with runners and non-runners. This is followed by a steep switchback ramp to descend off the bridge, adding to the stretch of unpleasantness. Providence seems like a nice city, but you don't see much of it on the course. I really wasn't a fan of all the twists and turns in the course since you start to lose track of where you are or what direction you're running in. There are a couple long stretches on the bike path, which are nice except that there are no water stops for several miles at a time. Other parts have you running on busy streets right along with traffic. While the police officers and volunteers were great controlling traffic, they can't be everywhere. I couldn't believe when I saw a car try to cut off a pack of runners to make a right turn. A spectator intervened to stop the car from driving into the runners. The aid stations had plenty of water, gels and even bananas at some locations. The only post race food I saw was tons and tons of pizza, which doesn't work for those of us who don't eat cheese. The beer garden was a nice touch though and had 3 varities of a local brew. The expo was ok and had some gear and supplies to purchase. The technical race shirt you receive is ok at best. I think it's the same shirt that the half marathoners and 5k runners get. The finishers medal is also generic and doesn't specify marathon on it. Definitely some disappointment on the shirt and the medal. The Hilton was walking distance to the start/finish line, the expo and several restaurants. This could be a great race, but it doesn't seem like the community supports it. The morning news had coverage of the 5k that ran the day before, but made no mention of the marathon that was about to start within the hour. It would've been nice to get the word out there either to attract spectators or at least warn people that there will be some congestion on the roads. Overall I was a bit disappointed with this race. It seems as though it has improved from past years based on previous reviews, but changes are still necessary in order to make this a fun, enjoyable race.
2.0

By: Maureen T.

Posted: October 13, 2011

Low-Key Marathon and mostly flat course to BQ

I ran this marathon on May 1, 2011 as my 8th marathon (I'd run 5 boston's previously and also Cape Cod and Shamrock-Virginia Beach). I live in Massachusetts about an hour away so I picked this race since it was only 2 weeks after the Boston Marathon and I could train all winter alongside my friends who were training for Boston. It was an easy drive on marathon morning to just drive there and get my number, shirt, etc. Providence/Cox was a great course for the mostpart except for the terrible 'switchback'ramp' on a bridge around mile 25. what a terrible place for that. my knees were buckling in and just before that we all ran on a very narrow bridge where you would be unable to pass another runner (I was not in the position to do so but if I had there physically wouldn't be enough room). I liked running on the bike trails although a lot of bikers would look annoyed at all the runners everywhere. My husband and kids were able to drive the course with ease and stop to cheer for me over 5 times (something that is impossible at Boston or any big marathon). I did a PR here by 6 minutes and I qualified for Boston by 10 minutes. The shirt is okay but could have been a lot nicer but I was thankful for a 'child's size L' since I'd requested XS and was able to get a shirt that actually fit me. I was able to park for free but that's because I went super early that morning and parked in the Capital Grille parking lot before any attendants arrived. Also, you may want to wait till November to sign up because I signed up the end of October and then a few days later got an e-mail saying if I signed up between Nov 1 and Dec 31 I'd get a coolmax hat and a 'deluxe' goody bag. However, since I signed up in October I was told I wouldn't get any of that unless they happened to have an extra hat.
4.0

By: Suzanne B.

Posted: September 30, 2011

Has potential, but not worth going out of your way

This race has lots of potential, but for now it isn't worth going out of your way to get to or to train for. The course was lovely in a few places, but mostly it seemed to be ran through lousy neighborhoods and at one point around mile 25 it wrapped around an overpass bridge, there was no way to run that! They kept the finish line open until the last runner made it in and the massage people weren't in a rush to clean up and there was plenty of food on the course and at the finish even though I was a back of the pack runner for this one. So kudos on all that; it really needs work setting up a new course through scenic areas and they should close off the roads, not have us running along the sides.
2.0

By: si f.

Posted: May 17, 2011

Average.

I ran a PR two weeks after setting a PR at Boston. This course can be fast. The expo was small, disorganized, and geared to the half marathoners. The full marathon numbers were posted on the wall, out of the way, behind a booth and I had to ask where they were. The shirt is cheap and falling apart, and I haven't worn it yet. The race start was set up ok. In downtown PVD. I found free parking 2 blocks from the start on the street, but that was because I scouted it out the day before when I visited the expo. Plenty of porta-potties, although I used the BR at the convention center to avoid the lines. The race start area had signs suggesting a place to line up for your expected pace. Nobody paid attention to those and it was a bit of a cluster. The pack spread out quickly once we crossed the start. I liked how the half split from the full early, about two miles in. The water stops were located where they needed to be, and staffed with enthusiastic volunteers. You often didn't know if you were getting h2o or gatorade until it was in your hand. No consistent flavor of gatorade either. PLENTY OF GU!! Again, PLENTY OF GU!! I packed my own and didn't partake, but there was gu available every couple miles from something like mile 5 in. Also bananas and oranges available if you needed them. The course was ok. They got you out of providence as fast as they could. Which is always a good idea. Nice water views as you run along the river and the East Bay. Quiet community roads and the bike path were nice too. Rolling hills and a couple of slightly challenging peaks around mile 20. Weird little switchback coming off of a way too narrow pedestrian bridge. The finish was at the same location as the start. I was medaled, kind of a cheesy medal emblazoned with the sponsor logo, and then helped myself to a water and Gatorade, and there was piles of pizza 30 feet from the finish line, exactly what you need after a hard marathon. Pizza and beer! One free Naragansett beer in the beer garden. It was an ok race, not a destination race, unless you need RI for a fifty state endeavor. I won't repeat it, or any other event again.
3.0

By: Sarah M.

Posted: May 15, 2011

Okay local race

This race was alright, but nothing special. The expo was small/non-existent. Ugly shirts. I wasn't a fan of the course. Sometimes it was kinda scenic, but mostly in industrial areas or on the bikepath. It was a very sunny day and there was little to no shade along the course. Finish line was a let-down. The only food I could find was pizza and stale bagel sticks. If you live near Providence this is worth checking out for a low-hassle race, but I wouldn't bother traveling for it.
3.0

By: Lan R.

Posted: May 14, 2011

NICE COURSE, GOOD ORGANIZATION

I enjoyed the course and the folks on the bikes who were supporting runners by riding back and forth on the course and providing words of encouragement! I don't know her name but one lady rode back and forth between miles 10 and 18 and cheered me on at every mile! Thank you so much! I won my age group and I was contacted right away as they are going to mail the awards. That's a nice touch. I really don't have any negatives. That last crossing of the river was on a narrow path and there were not only runners that were walking - there were other people trying to cross in the opposite direction, which made it challenging. That's the only thing I'd change. Waters stops were well stocked and volunteers were enthusiastic. We stayed at the Courtyard that was right at the start/finish and they were great.
4.0

By: Brendan H.

Posted: May 12, 2011

Better every year

I've run this race three years in a row now and it continues to improve. It's a scenic course with some good variety. Crowds are great in downtown at the start and finish, though quieter out on the bike path portion of the race. Water stations are well stocked and the volunteers were terrific this year. Great weather certainly helped. Expo was also a significant improvement over past years. I'd absolutely recommend this race to anyone looking for a well run, mid-size marathon.
5.0

By: George Southgate

Posted: May 10, 2011

Great weather and course.

This is a great marathon. The weather was ideal. The course had some hills early, and the rest wandered along bike paths and scenic sights of rivers and lakes.
5.0

By: Ron W.

Posted: May 09, 2011

Kudos to the Race Directors!

Clearly the race directors have listened to the complaints from runners of the previous Providence Marathons. There was enough GU to supply the entire city. There was tons of food, even for those of us who limped in late. The expo was a good-sized; we picked up marathon-themed shirts for adults and children. One thing that I found puzzling was how little publicity there was in the local media. You really had to search the Providence Journal to find an article, even on race day. I've been places the size of Providence where there was lots of buzz, in the newspapers and on television. Providence is a great marathon and the city should celebrate it.
4.0

By: Mark C.

Posted: May 03, 2011

A well-run race on a relatively flat course

I really enjoyed this marathon. It's my 14th overall and I was trying to qualify again for Boston (which I did, although I missed qualifying 10 minutes faster than my BQ time by a shade over 1 minute). It's a very fair course with only one minor hill that's not really anything if one trains on hills. Race temps were ideal but I would have preferred an overcast sky. Oh well, can't have everything! Probably my favorite thing about the race (other than the course), is that the convention center is open race morning and it's only a block away from the start. It's a good place to hang out race morning and stretch, and one can avoid the portojohn lines entirely. Spectators were decent for a mid-size marathon, and there were a couple of places where they were very vocal. That always helps. The headwind with 1.3 miles to go was a bummer, but other than that, it was a fine race. My one big suggestion for improvement is to have separate shirts for marathon, half-marathon, and 5K runners. This is a small thing and easy to fix. Runners like to show off their accomplishments with their marathon shirt, and if it just says 'Cox Rhode Races' followed by 'Marathon, Half-Marathon, and 5K', it's a bit of a let down. Especially for those that make this marathon a destination marathon (as I did), we don't want a generic shirt. My 2 cents.
4.0

By: Bridget S.

Posted: May 02, 2011

Don't Miss This One!

I ran the half and completed state #48 with this race, and I can say that it was one of my favorites to date. The pre-race communication and website are excellent, and provide you with all the needed details. The expo, start and finish are all within walking distance of several great downtown hotels, so getting around is quite easy. The course is well-marked, accurate, and very scenic, weaving through some nice neighborhoods with the last couple of miles along the water. The water stations are well positioned throughout the course and the volunteers are some of the nicest I've encountered. The music at the start was great and the finisher's area had a good variety of foods and liquids, especially that cold chocolate milk - thank you! Finally, the finisher's medal is one of the best! Many, many thanks to the race director for putting together such an organized and fun race. This is not one you want to miss!
5.0

By: Howard C.

Posted: May 02, 2011

Nice small city road marathon

Superb convenience for out-of-towners - Expo/start/finish just a couple of short blocks from major hotels Westin, Hampton Inn, Biltmore. Start corrals by the honor system. The areas for sub 10 minute mile pace groups were WAY TOO SMALL, almost ridiculously so. Only congested at the start and initial 1/2-1 mile+. Marathoners and half-marathoners split at ~ mile 2; not to encounter each other again. Well stocked aid stations (running at a ~3:40 pace), including lots of gatorade and gels and even fruit at most of the stations (some stations were water only). Total of 14 aid stations, typically ~1.5 miles apart. This was sufficient for a cool, breezy, perfect day (low 40's Fahrenheit at start to a peak in the low 50's at the finish for 2011), but probably would not have been optimal for many runners if the day were hot/humid, unless carrying your own extra supplies. Roads and bike paths were well marked with signs, mile markers on each and every mile and one official time clock at the 13.1 mile split. Excellent police presence to block traffic. Lots of volunteers on the course to guide you at turns, etc. Flat (loop) course except for a couple of small hills near the beginning and end. Goes through some industrial parts of town, non-descript suburban areas, and by some wealthy-appearing neighborhoods. Some areas had some really nice views of the waterfront. Nice uniquely shaped medal (shaped like the 'X' in COX Communications, the sponsor) with the date, but states 'marathon + 1/2 marathon' (does not distinguish between the two). Overall, a well done job on the part of the organizers.
4.0

By: Susie T.

Posted: May 02, 2011

Not enough spectators, boring course

This was my first small marathon, having run only larger races, like NYC. I knew it would not be like that, but I was not prepared to spend most of the race going through bike paths and quiet neighborhoods. Most of the course was scenic, and would have been nice for a training run, but for a race, I found it boring, lonely, and hard to stay motivated & in a 'race' mindset. The bike path was not closed to the public, which made it weird to share with cyclists and walkers. Most of the roadways were not closed to traffic - just ran on the shoulder with car traffic passing you by. Would have enjoyed the race more if it was more downtown, and in more populated areas. Maybe it would have been better if the full and half marathons would have shared the course for more of the race. (we split at mile 2) A little hilly at the beginning, and 2 short, steep hills near mile 23. But mostly flat. Also, I would have preferred more appropriate food at the finish - not in the mood for pizza after 3.5 hrs of running. It was well organized for the size of the race & good if you are local, but I would not do this race again.
2.0

By: Gunnar H.

Posted: May 02, 2011

Smaller Race

Providence is a nice middle size town.. The Marathon is small to medium size, growing in participants Race Day pick-up of BIB and T-Shirt were a big positive.. but goody bag is not worse mentioning Half and Full Marathon start together and share the same course for the first 2 Miles, so the beginning is crowded.. The course is mostly flat, one Hill in 2 parts at mile 6 and one at mile 23 followed by a steep downhill.. the downhill might hurt your quads.. I didn't like the bridge crossing at Mile 24, Bridge was narrow and bicycles and pedestrians were coming in opposite direction, also tough to overpass there.. worse is running down the pathway after the bridge.. It's not a closed course.. roads and bike paths are shared.. which might cause risky situation, as not everybody is patient and/or understanding towards Runners. Sufficient aid and water stations, but spectator support can be thin or none at parts of the course.. After Race Pizza, Gatorade and Zico Coconut Water was available to take, also an EXPO with T-Shirt Sale and a Beer tent.. All in all good experience
4.0

By: Janet G.

Posted: May 02, 2011

Great support. Beautiful course.

This was my first marathon, and having run the Providence Half last year, I knew it would be well run. But I didn't appreciate how very beautiful the course would be compared to their half! There is adequate parking (prepare to pay though) and enough porta-potties at the start. There was great support from police, and people directing runners at almost every corner and intersection, and at the many water stops. I decided to not carry my water belt and it was a good decision - many water/Gatorade/GU/banana stops. Very nice people. Three med stations on the way. Much of the run was on a bike path in the woods; the rest was through waterfront neighborhoods and golf courses. So many wonderful people. Loved it and looking forward to my next one at Prov!
4.0

By: Debralyn S.

Posted: May 02, 2011

Well organized marathon

This was one of the best organized road marathons I've participated in lately. It exceeded my expectations. The best thing was the focus on the marathon. They didn't have relays and split the half marathon at mile 2.5 so you knew after that point you could settle in with those who would be along with you for all 26.2 miles. It seems like most cities try to lump together a half marathon, relay, 10K, etc., and I was pleased to see this race didn't follow suit. City was very friendly toward runners. Hotel (Hilton) was accommodating despite being very busy, and various stores and restaurants were aware of the marathon, which always tells me a race communicates well with the city. For someone traveling to Providence, there were lots of great things to do for a weekend- art museums, shopping, and even a Little Italy to carbo load. Expo was just the right size for me, but I prefer smaller, well organized expos. Enough to walk around and get what you need, and get out and get ready to race. Also, at the start, I saw runners staying warm before the race by waiting in the convention center. Great idea to start a race by such location so runners can stay warm and stretch. Lastly, aid stations were plentiful! I can't imagine that they could have run out of anything - they had water, Gatorade, bananas, GU, and medical support amply distributed along the course. Great job, Providence! This marathon was very well organized and exceeded my expectations!
5.0

By: Juliana R.

Posted: September 29, 2010

Fun time but could be better

This was my second marathon and I have to say while it was fun I wasn't thrilled. The course was dead flat (I blinked and missed the one hill) and fairly scenic at times along the water. But, then, other times you were running under highway overpasses and along industrial warehouses. The bike path was nice but was confusing at times as you double-backed along it. The spectators were pretty cool, but there was hardly anyone outside of the downtown start/finish area. My biggest gripe, though, was the total lack of gels and little Gatorade/water near the end. Granted, I ran on a really hot day and am a slower runner, but by the time I was hitting stations at 18+, they only had water, or were already closing up shop (only three hours in?!). I was saved at mile 19 by a lonely local kid giving me water on his front lawn (thank you!). The end of the race was pretty cool, though, and had lots to do. The host hotel was also super nice; they actually held my race bag for me while running, and let me check in early and out late - totally worth the money! So, at the end of the day, a fairly nice race, but I might continue to shop around.
3.0

By: Paul K.

Posted: September 19, 2010

Potential for greatness, but needs work

The Pros: -I BQ'd (3:10), so yes, this is a good BQ course. There are a few minor hills in the beginning, then flat, and 1 very short (but steep) hill at around mile 23, going onto the bridge. -The race is staged in a smart area. I walked about 400 meters from my hotel (The Biltmore) to the start. There were at least 2 other large hotels located the same distance away. -Long-sleeve tech shirt. Nice medal. -I liked the idea of the porta-johns in the race corrals. The Cons: -About a week before the race, reports starting saying it would be HOT that day, yet the course was extremely understocked for hydration/electrolytes. -The course may have been too long. I make certain to run the tangents, yet my Garmin measured me in at 26.46 miles. -Poor traffic control. At one point (in the very south) you were running around cars down a narrow street. My wife was driving to differnt spots to hand me water along the course and a cop directed her ON TO the course. She asked, "Are you sure?" and he politely, said, "Yeah, no problem!" -A lot of this race is run on a bike path, which is fine except that it was open to walkers/cyclist who seemed to be bothered to yield to the racers. I think if the race directors can fix these problems by next year, they will have a really great race to offer - one that I foresee will only grow in popularity. I would like to come back one day, but not until I hear that these problems have been fixed.
3.0

By: Sarah C.

Posted: July 21, 2010

More spectators than expected but no gels

The course was okay, with a few nice views along the water, and there were more spectators then I expected, considering the size of the race. There was always someone cheering you along and the support was much needed at times because there were NO gels as advertised. I would have brought my own or planned ahead had I known, but nothing was said at the expo when I picked up my bib. I don't think they ran out because I was a 3:30 finisher, but if that was the problem, it was poor planning on their part.
4.0

By: andy p.

Posted: June 02, 2010

Very nice race, but where were the gels?

Pros: Well organized race day. Nice starting area. Clear directions where to be for the start. Nice breeze off the water. Cons: Gels promised at 4 stops. There were never any, and no comment as to why. Would have brought my own if they had not advertised that they would be out there.
3.0

By: Caitlin T.

Posted: May 28, 2010

Quality mid-sized race

I ran this race three weeks ago, and as a whole, I would have to give it a large stamp of approval for a mid-sized race. Pros: - The course is great: Scenic, with a nice urban/rural mix, and I loved the run back into Providence along the water - While there weren't as many fans as at the big-city races, i wasn't expecting that, and the fans that were along the course and at the finish line were phenomenal! - Long-sleeve tech shirt - Post-race food and beverage - Registration was hassle-free - Safe course Cons: - The expo has room for improvement - Start and porta-potties could be arranged better Overall, so long as you aren't expecting a Boston or New York, big-city atmosphere, this is a great race.
5.0

By: Eddie Hahn

Posted: May 10, 2010

Needs Improvement - Has Excellent Potential

First, as a "50 States" marathoner, I say we should give this race support so that our athletes have a couple of options for RI rather than one or none. The marathon in Exeter is a qualifier, so that eliminates it as an option for many of us. Needs Improvement: -There was no electrolyte replacement or aid station support (outside of water between about miles 5 and 20). Admittedly, I was on a 5:30-6:00 marathon pace, but had I known in advance that water would only be available for marathoners ahead of a certain pace, I could have used a Camelbak or hydration belt. (Thanks much in part to two very nice lady volunteers who met some of us back-of-the-packers on the course, with a bag of M&Ms, etc. at about mile 18.) -Some confusion about the so called "free race shirt to the first 4,000 registered." The default shirt (cotton) was the one "everyone" was to get and the tech shirt to the first 4K (all race distances). I had to "ask" about the extra shirt - which has a big "5KM" on the back. (It's still a nice perk, and I was happy to receive it, but my guess is that most entrants didn't bother to ask for it." -I agree that the expo was small and limited. -A little challenging at times with the foot traffic on the paths around 23-26 - composed of people who were indifferent to the marathon. -The "Cox" Providence Rhode Race logo is understandable and interesting, but I would prefer that "Rhode Island" is spelled out! Pros: -Loved the course - a nice, rural/urban mix - not what I expected in RI. Neat park paths, golf courses, views of the bay, and so on. -Beer and pizza at the finish -Nice long-sleeve tech shirt and medal.
3.0

By: kevin p.

Posted: May 10, 2010

Positive

My first and probably only marathon, and overall I thought it was very well organized. My only beef was the lack of food and beer - and the fact that there was no one to tell me where it was after running for five and a half hours.
3.0

By: Jessica S.

Posted: May 09, 2010

So-so first marathon; wouldn't run again

This was a disappointing first marathon, especially after using part of the Boston Marathon two weeks earlier as my 22-mile training run. I would not run this race again. Pros: -Scenic course. Running along the water and country clubs was very pretty, and gave us a nice breeze. There was also a good amount of shade. -There were plenty of porta-potties at the start, though they were placed right at the start line, which got congested. -I liked the bib timing - one less thing to think about. -There was plenty of food and drink at the finish, though I had no appetite for greasy pizza after running in 80-degree weather. -Nice medal and shirt (though it would be nice if the marathoners had their own shirt; there's no way to tell if you ran the marathon, half marathon, or 5K). Cons: -Nonexistent expo. I went looking to buy running gear, and there was none to be found. -The race was definitely geared towards the half marathon runners. -Very few spectators. We ran on bike paths and through residential areas where the residents had no idea that a marathon was even going on. -Some people liked the bike paths, but I thought they were too straight, flat, boring, and lonely. -The race started an hour too late, so it was really hot from mile 20-on. -Combined with the lack of aid/water stations after mile 20, this killed my chance at a BQ. I was on pace for a 3:35 until mile 20, but finished in 3:51, somewhat due to heat and dehydration.
2.0

By: Lora E.

Posted: May 07, 2010

Not bad, but could be better

This was my 52nd marathon. Pros: Good organization Packet pick-up was easy Great volunteers Lots of food (pizza) at finish Awesome medal Tech shirt Cons: Late start. Runners are used to getting up early to run. Given the heat it would have been nice to start at least an hour earlier to minimize the impact of the heat. Lack of water in the later miles No sports drink, gels, etc. from mile 17, on where they are needed most Small expo with limited vendors; I needed Body Glide and had to go elsewhere to get it Course was not well marked; a couple of us made wrong turns and did extra miles It was hot and humid (realize race director can't control the weather) and the lack of Gatorade from mile 17 to the finish was a major snafu. One of the later water stops didn't even have water. From Mile 23 to the finish, again no water stops - not good. I suggest that the race start at least an hour earlier to minimize the impact of weather - plus it would also help with traffic control. If you plan to run this race, make sure you carry water and your own gels. If you need crowd support, this is not the race for you.
3.0

By: Rkd D.

Posted: May 06, 2010

Decent, small city race

I ran the half. Some of the workers in the host hotel and adjacent convention center were unaware that a marathon expo was taking place, which was interesting. The race itself was well-organized. The start and finish went seamlessly. An additional water stop could have been placed around the 6-7 mile mark (in Pawtucket). The course has some gradual, rolling hills. In all, a decent experience.
3.0

By: Timothy S.

Posted: May 05, 2010

Decent race

I was pleased that the half and full marathon courses parted ways early in the race, before 2 miles - that was a big plus for me. The course was not really challenging, though there was some variety, and it would have been nice if there were more spectators other than at the water stops. At times we were running alongside traffic, so that was not good, although there was excellent police and volunteer support at the intersections. The start/finish downtown was great, close to hotels, and not far from many excellent restuarants for pasta. The expo was small but that was OK. I liked the medal and shirt - very nice. I ran this for my 30th state and would recommend this for other 50 Staters.
3.0

By: donnie p.

Posted: May 04, 2010

Would run this one again

Good: 1) Scenic course - what the course lacked in crowd numbers it more than made up for in a very scenic route. A very pretty course for a course run in a big city. Lots of green and water. 2) Mostly flat course - a few hills at the start, but nothing too serious. Flatter than the Portland Marathon and Portland isn't that hilly. Seemed like a fast course if not for the muggy, warm weather. 3) Lots of water stops - seemed like there were plenty of water stops and they were located about where they needed to be (even on a hot day). Maybe more Gatorade could be put out though. 4) Friendly volunteers and police officers along the course - all were yelling, and many had posters. Many thanks! 5) Four hours after the marathon started, there was plenty of food left. Boxes full of pizza stacked high. Hit the spot. I liked having the choice of a beer afterward too. 6) I liked the long sleeve shirt - unique. Bad: 1) There are switchbacks around mile 23 or so to get up and down from a bridge. Hard to get any speed going downhill on a switchback. 2) I know it is a sign of the times, but the sponsor name is huge on the medal. Wish it just said, "Providence." But I do want to thank the sponsor for contributing. 3) It is a newer marathon and I know it will grow. The expo was a little on the small side, but I don't normally make a marathon choice on expo size. Other: 1) If you have the time, visit Newport. 2) I disagree with the others regarding course safety. I never felt unsafe due to car traffic. The easy solution was to run on the correct side of the orange cones. 3) I also liked running on the bike path at times.
4.0

By: David Eggermann

Posted: May 03, 2010

A young race; great effort; will get better

Positives and negatives from the beginning: Disappointing expo the night before, with a goody bag filled with throw-away advertisements. On race morning before the start, there was one small table with water in Dixie cups; there was no food, and no coffee, so I had to walk to a nearby Starbucks. disappointing. Porta-johns were all placed in the same location at the start staging area - disorganized. Good start, but it would have been cleaner to separate the marathoners from the half marathoners and stagger them, as the staging area was too small for both groups. But they did a good job of separating the two a couple of miles into the race. The course was pretty boring - not as much attractive (vs. industrial) water front as I was expecting. Also, there was very little cityscape, so they didn't seem to focus on showing off Providence. I never found gel in the out miles, which I was counting on, and there seemed to be some missing mile markers (25 and 26), so it was difficult to gauge when to give that extra push at the end. You couldn't see the finish line until perhaps two-tenths-of-a-mile away, so there was not much time left. Great, enthusiastic announcer; great post-run food (hundreds of pizzas); a great band; and we got one free beer each (a second would have been nice). You can see that a lot of effort was put out and I'd like to thank all for their hard work. I had fun - but they have some learning to do compared with other small-to-mid-sized marathons. Give this one a few years to get as good as they can be.
3.0

By: Jen R.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Loved This Small Race

This is a great, small race. I gave 4 stars for spectators because you can't expect a big crowd at a small race, so for the size of the race, the places where there were spectators were great. The best spectator of all saved me - a country market was giving out bottles of water (at mile 21?) and I really needed that - it it got me through the rest of the race. The course is relatively flat; you get the hills out of the way in the beginning. There were some small, rolling hills towards the end, but nothing significant. I loved being able to stay at the hotel right near the start - that was key! This is a race to try to run with someone else if possible, or with an iPod, as there were only 2 or 3 spots where there was music. This is my 9th marathon and one of my favorites!
4.0

By: Alexandra E.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Where was the food?

I was very disappointed in the lack of food at the so-called "aid stations." The course map showed 4 aid stations at which we'd be able to get bars, bananas and power gels. There was ONE aid station at which I was able to get a banana and a Luna Bar at mile 20!! Mile 20! Why bother at mile 20 when all I have left are 6 miles? If you're not going to offer food, then tell us so that we can be prepared and bring our own. It is shameful that you led your full marathoners to believe there would be food available at 4 places on the route and keep them guessing if there would ever be any throughout most of the race.
2.0

By: Chris M.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Nice course, little else.

I ran the marathon, and the course was fair, although the environment was occasionally bizarre. Running down the zig-zag ramp off the bridge at mile 25 and change was odd, to say the least. Water stations could have been more plentiful, although they would have sufficed if it were a 45-degree day. Spectators were sparse, but were welcome (especially when they had water!). Overall, a nice course, although support could have been beefed up a bit.
3.0

By: Jessica W.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Good, but...

The Cox Sports Providence Marathon has been steadily improving over the past three years. This was my first Providence Marathon, but, after reading the comments from 2008 and 2009, I can safely say that this year was the best of the three, organizationally speaking. Still, there are some glitches that must be addressed: 1. Porta-potties lining the curb at the start corral. I realize this is a race start in a cramped city setting, but there were queues, inside the corral, for the toilets, all the way up until the final seconds before the gun. 2. Running on the beautiful bike paths for a large portion of the race was wonderful, but runners were sharing the path with kids on bikes and fast-moving cyclists. One runner had to nicely (but firmly) ask a kid on a bike to get out of the way. More than once. 3. From approximately mile 24.5 to 25, runners crossed a bridge back into the city, and we were relegated to a narrow, barricaded walkway for cyclists. There were cyclists on the walkway when runners were trying to crank it up for this final portion of the race, and some of the cyclists needed a loud heads up/"on your left!" so that they would get out of the way. The walkway was so narrow, two people abreast could not walk, run, or bike side by side. This was for a relatively short section, but still, at that stage in the marathon, you don't want to be dodging bikes. 4. Unless my Garmin GPS unit was way off, the race was about 400 meters too long. 5. I'm not the type of marathoner who needs a continuous cheering section, but if you like more spectator support, Providence may not be for you. There was strong spectator support at the start and finish, and some clots of people along the course - two families made their own much-needed homemade water station for us - but many portions of the race were quiet. The pluses: The aforementioned start and finishing support; the aid station volunteers who were right there with water and Gatorade (temps were a little high... 70s, and maybe into the 80s, so well-stocked fluid stations were essential); a tough(ish) course in a beautiful New England city. Complementary sports massage at the party in the park after. This was a huge plus. If the race directors iron out those glitches, this will be a really solid event in a friendly, funky city.
3.0

By: Michael M.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Not a bad race, but some room for growth

Overall I thought the race organizers did an ok-to-good job, but not an excellent job. Registration online was easy, and an organizer even answered a question I emailed quite promptly. The packet pick-up was self explanatory, but the expo was pretty slim. I had hoped they would be giving out more stuff (e.g., food, GU packets). I'm not entirely sure why they would make a black long-sleeved shirt, but my wife liked it, so maybe that wasn't bad. They started the full and half marathoners at the same time, which made for a heck of a mess at the start; I think they should start the half-marathoners 30 minutes back or so. My main gripe was with the aid stations on the course... they were laid out at seemingly random intervals, so I had a hard time mentally planning for when my next water would be. That sucked. The spectators were sparse, but those who came out were enthusiastic. The pizza at the end sort of made me want to vomit... how about some ice cream or anything else that's not so greasy and heavy instead? (I felt the food/beer at the end was catering more for the 5K runners.)
3.0

By: Rita T.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Nice little city

Providence was a pleasant surprise. Really nice riverwalk, and resturant area near hotels. We tried "Ardeno" and had the best dinner the night before the race. The hills weren't too bad. I enjoyed the bike paths, not so much the roads with traffic still along side runners. The day got a bit warm and the breeze off the water was pleasant. Water stops could have been a bit better organized. Not many spectators, but those out there were upbeat. Great volunteers at the finish. If you want crowds, find a big city; if you want elbow room, this one is wonderful.
3.0

By: Kerri H.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Good marathon with some quirks

The marathon was good overall with some bad quirks. Registration seemed confusing within the hotel, and I wasn't sure where to go to pick up a packet. Minor stuff. The marathon was on a good, good course... pretty areas. Police and volunteers were great. I am a 5-hour marathoner... but with the hot day, I was surprised there was no Gatorade from mile 15 on and no GU, bananas, etc. That doesn't make for a good second half of the day.
3.0

By: T.V. T.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Shaded path helped with heat

This was my 30th marathon, back from an 18-month hiatus. This was a good marathon, although it lacked some organization in the way of signage and markers on the course. Some areas of the course were just dangerous, due to car traffic whizzing by. The water stations were spread out too much, especially for the warm conditions on race day. Spectators were few and far. The expo was not as organized and there was a lack of good vendors. Overall, I did enjoy my comeback race and did well, but I expected more for what I paid.
3.0

By: Thom B.

Posted: May 03, 2010

TERRIBLE

Very disappointed. Race officials advertised 4 aid stations with gel. THERE WERE ZERO! This is completely unacceptable and very dangerous. I pray that there were no serious health-related injuries due to complete neglect of the race officials. I ran a few miles with a first-time marathoner and the lack of gels on the course will most likely make this his last. Months of training ruined by lack of respect and planning on race officials' part. Additionally, I was on schedule to secure a BQ, but with no fuel, that wasn't going to happen. They did manage to get some bananas and some chocolate protein bars at around mile 20, but this is not what was promised and they should not be proud of that shortfall. I did send them an e-mail and a race official did contact me; I was offered entry into the fall marathon, but it conflicts with my other marathon schedule. I hope they will offer a refund. The course was okay and the crowd at the finish was good. Skip this and look for a real marathon to run.
2.0

By: B. H.

Posted: May 03, 2010

Beautiful course, with some tough hills

I was very surprised at this very scenic marathon, running on some of the bike trails and in residential areas! I ran the marathon, and it was tough with the hills at the beginning. It was a hot and humid day, and more Gatorade on the course would have been great! The water stops were well managed and volunteers were great! I thought the porta-johns at the starting line were cleverly placed! I would recommend this to others, but tell them to train for rolling hills! Thanks!!
4.0

By: Jessica S.

Posted: May 02, 2010

Pretty but boring

This was my first marathon, and I think I was expecting a little more excitement. The course was very pretty, with lots of shade, beautiful views, and a nice breeze from the water, not to mention 90% flat. However, running on the bike path for at least half the course definitely got boring, especially since there were barely any spectators in these areas. Unfortunately, this race seemed to really cater more to the half marathon runners. I would probably not run this race again, as I prefer the excitement of a big-city race.
3.0

By: Madeleine Marecki

Posted: May 08, 2009

Wonderful experience!

This is a wonderful, well-organized race that is characterized by a positive, energetic vibe from both participants and spectators. The course is great - very scenic, and really gives you a taste of Providence and Rhode Island. The post-race festivities were an added bonus. If you're looking to throw down a solid marathon or half-marathon time on a pretty course, be sure to run this race. Thanks for a great race experience!
5.0

By: Russell C.

Posted: May 08, 2009

Providence Deserves More

This race is chaos. Nothing seemed to be in place, and nothing seemed smooth. The course takes you by buildings that have been spray-painted. The water stops were off throughout the course. I thank the spectators and volunteers, but there were not any good places for spectators.
2.0

By: Tom M.

Posted: May 08, 2009

Super first marathon!

This was my first and it will always be special for me. The weather was perfect but we just got lucky with that. Everything was run so smoothly! The course was great... not completely flat but not difficult at all. Most of the inclines were during the first several miles anyway, and none of them were anything to be concerned about. Crowd support was so much better than I expected. What a difference it makes to have an enthusiastic crowd throughout! Organization and logistics were great. There were no hassles whatsoever, from picking up my entry package to the post-race party. There may have been a couple of mile markers missing (either that or they were there but I missed them), and either the 24- or 25-mile marker was misplaced, but no big deal. That did not have any influence on my finish time so I am not concerned about it. Plenty of water stops/Gatorade when you needed them. Nice shirts too! Overall they put on a great race. I like the fact that this is fairly small marathon with a big marathon buzz on race-day!!
5.0

By: Mark Anderson

Posted: May 08, 2009

Fun, Flat (mostly), Fast, Scenic.

I have run 15 marathons, all in the Northeast. Other than Boston, this was my favorite. Fantastic support, well marked course, great aid stations. The best part is parking one block from the start. There were water views and woods for most of the course.
5.0

By: Jonpaul G.

Posted: May 07, 2009

Much Better Than Expected

After reading the comments from the 2008 race, I expected a heck of a lot worse. The course was challenging but not overly challenging. The field of runners wasn't too heavy to make congestion much of a problem. The aid stations were plentiful and well-stocked. Volunteers were courteous and supportive. The expo was decent. Nice technical shirts and pretty medals with a picture of the canal in downtown Providence on the back. I had a really terrific time running Providence and would be happy to run the course again. Whatever was wrong in 2008 definitely improved this year.
4.0

By: David Marcus

Posted: May 07, 2009

Scenic city marathon!

I was most impressed by how much of the marathon was scenic. There wasn't a single ugly industrial stretch. Lots of river views, and a lot of it was on a bike path. The course was pretty flat, especially in the last 7 miles when you needed it to be! My only complaint was the inconsistent water, and a mile 24-marker that was so far off-base, that I almost gave up on breaking 4 hours until I passed the 25th marker .6 miles later!
4.0

By: Mark F.

Posted: May 06, 2009

AWESOME MARATHON! GREAT COURSE!

Thank you for a great race! It was an absolute blast. I ran the marathon and I thought the course was terrific. Very fair, not too hilly, not too flat, the paved trails were awesome, and the scenery and neighborhoods were great. The water and Gatorade stops were plentiful and just right; please thank all of the volunteers who manned those stations. The boys yelling encouragement up on the bridge around mile 24 were clutch, as were the girls after the bridge. I needed a 3:30 to qualify for Boston and I ran a net 3:29:59! It was absolutely NUTS! My friend picked me up at 25.5 and ran in with me screaming to get moving. The 5K runners were all converging from their race; it was pure madness - a buzz I will never forget. We had dinner in the Italian section on Atwood St. at a place called Mediterreano Cafe. We ate outside at the sidewalk area, and it was a great place to get a pasta feed. If I had to offer a criticism, I would say that I didn't love coming in with 5K runners after busting it for 26.2. There is something off with that idea. The mile marker at mile 19 was also 1/4-mile short (unless I ran a 5:53 19th mile - not) and some nut drew 24 in chalk on the path up towards the bridge before the real 24 mile marker showed up a 1/4-mile later (unless I was hallucinating, which is possible at mile 24). It doesn't take much to get confused late in a marathon. Other than that, I had a ball. I hope this race is an annual for years to come. The first weekend in May is a great time to run a marathon in New England. The weather was perfect. Great job, race organizers!
4.0

By: Angela S.

Posted: May 06, 2009

So much better than last year!

The race director heard our comments from last year, and made major improvements to this year's race. I loved the new course, and especially enjoyed the bike path section. It was great having the start and finish at the same place. The expo was much better and the band was great. My only complaint... no Dunkin Donuts at the finish line, bummer! I'll be back again next year.
5.0

By: Kevin B.

Posted: May 06, 2009

Great BQ opportunity

I stayed clear of the '08 one because of the course and signed on for '09 because of the course - it is an excellent BQ course. There were no hiccups in the race organization. The finish was terrific; the post-race was well done; the expo was nothing special and there wasn't much gear there; the worst part of the course (the ramp at the end of the bike path at mile 25) will be gone next year, which would improve my 4-star rating up to 5. Water stops could be distributed a bit better; fans were supportive though sparse in some places. Providence did a great job hosting this event.
4.0

By: Jennifer B.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Great volunteers and a lot of fun!

I did the half-marathon with my husband. The half and the full go to about mile 8 together and then break off. The hills in that first section were hard, but the flat after that made up for it. Great goody bags. The start was well organized, with water and bananas and tents from sponsors. The finish was great too! Very organized. So much food and drink (water, sports drinks, and beer). There was music at the end. There were people all throughout the course. SO many volunteers! All were encouraging. Two tiny things: one was that the expo ended at 5, and coming from out of town we only made it just in time, and the other was that after mile 8, the half-marathon mile markers were forgotten until mile 13.
4.0

By: Rosa Nelly G.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Quiet

Pros: Nice neighborhoods, traffic control and a great police presence. Cons: Water stations were few and far between for the marathon distance. There were very few spectators, but that's not the fault of the organizers. I passed some homes where the owners were mowing their lawns, and they didn't even bother to look up to see us go by. The course was hillier than expected. I'm disappointed in the medal because all events are clumped onto one medal: marathon, half-marathon and 5K. For those who see your medal, there's no way to distinguish what you personally did. :-( Food for purchase? At least that's what it looked like. A food truck was there anyway, for those who just ran 26.2 miles. What the...? All I got was a teaspoon of chicken salad and a bottle of water. I ran this just to check it off my 50-states list.
3.0

By: Ric T.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Excellent Race

After 30+ years of running, I decided to choose this marathon as my first. I definitely made the right choice. I loved the course, as it provided some beautiful scenery and just enough elevation change to keep my pace honest. There were plenty of enthusiastic volunteers and spectators spread along the course. There were plenty of well-stocked water stations, many of which had Gatorade and GU. The mile markers were very obvious and there was a clock every 5 miles. Getting in and out of Providence was a breeze, as there was plenty of parking within a reasonable walking distance. Other positives: there was an abundance of porta-potties and enjoyable live music following the race. I only have two minor constructive criticisms: 1. the expo could be punched up a bit and; 2. although plentiful, the post-race refreshments consisted only of pizza, bananas, water and sports drink. I would definitely consider running this marathon again.
5.0

By: Allison L.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Nice, small race--good course

This was a very nice, small race. As a 5 hour marathoner, I have run my share of the big and the small races. This race is on a course of some rolling hills and a good part of it is on bike paths and some bridges. There was very little crowd support, so it felt much like being out for a training run once the half-marathoners split off. The start area was easily, especially if you were staying at the Westin or the Marriott. There were lots of parking garages for those driving in. I carried my own water since the water stops were a bit far apart for my own taste, but all the stations were well-stocked. I had a friend who ran 45 minutes faster than me who had several stations in a row that ran out of cups and that could not get water. There were a variety of Gatorade flavors. It wasn't a closed course but there was good traffic control and the intersections were clear. Some bikers on bike paths rode a bit too close to the runners for comfort, expecially on the bridge at mile 24. The path was so skinny that if bikes didn't stop, you could not get through, but this was a short section. The course was mostly well-marked with orange cones, although I had to ask for directions twice from bored police officers along bike paths connections. There were great race volunteers, but I had to search for food afterwards. There were no signs or anyone giving directions, so it was easy to miss. There were a few pizzas left but some people that finished before me said there where none when they came through. It's not unusual for a small race not to have food for the 5 hour people--points for this race for having some food and Gatorade. Some of the mile markers were placed wrong and there were two 24 mile marks! There were no splits, as there were only timing mats at the start and at the finish. There were time clocks running at 5, 10, 15 and 20 miles. There were very few spectators. The expo was decent and the weather near-perfect this year.
3.0

By: Kami K.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Nice!

Cox Sports Providence Marathon Providence, RI Sunday, May 3, 2009 8:00 a.m. I flew into Providence on Friday afternoon and stayed in the host hotel, Westin, which provided late check-out on Sunday. The packet pick-up/expo was in the hotel on Saturday and before the race on Sunday. The technical short-sleeved shirt each runner received was nice. Race morning temperatures ranged from low 50s to mid 60s. It was mainly overcast, and wind was not a factor. The start and finish lines were outside Westin. The out-and back/looped course was through Providence, East Providence, Seekonk, and Barrington. It was fairly scenic and included several hilly sections, which deserved plenty of respect. We ran the first eight miles with half-marathoners. There was a large number of volunteers throughout the course. Traffic control was very good. There were enough water/sports drink stations, which could have been organized better, as it was hard to know who was handing out water or sports drink. There were also sports gels in a few locations. The finisher's medallion was nice, and there were plenty of refreshments at the finish, which included pizza and beer. I saw several selfish runners and non-runners taking boxes of pizza and began to wonder if any would be left for late finishers. There was a band entertaining the finishers. In short, it was a well organized running event. I am a 50-stater and this was #46.
4.0

By: Doug C.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Great race - huge improvement over last year

What a huge improvement from last year. Everything about the race - from the expo to the free pizza and beer at the end - was awesome. The course was much improved from last year as well. Very scenic. Like the last person said, there were plenty of police and volunteers along the course. The water stops were much improved over last year too. One of my favorites!
4.0

By: Chris P.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Great time for a first marathon

I had a great time running my first marathon. I was a little nervous after seeing comments from last year, but because this is my home state and because of the ideal timing of this race, I signed up. And I'm glad that I did. The course was well marked. I never had a doubt about where to turn. Spectators were great - even as we were running through some of the quiet neighborhoods, people were out showing support. Many of the police officers were showing their support, and the aid stations were all stocked with more than enough volunteers handing out supplies and cheering on the runners. I can't wait to run this one again next May.
5.0

By: Mark S.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Small State - Big Race

The complaints about 2008 had me concerned; however, nothing seemed out of sorts this year. A fairly flat course with well stocked/placed aid stations. Nice post-race "party" and medal. Only issue was the mile markers - either I missed a few of the 26 or some were not there and a few, per my Garmin, seemed to be placed more than a few tenths off. For example, number 25 was definitely off. Overall, a great race and location. Not sure what happened last year, but they corrected any problems and the result was well done.
5.0

By: Anne G.

Posted: May 05, 2009

Great race, fabulous day!

I was amazed at how fun this race was, having read last year's comments. From the mellow start, to the well marked and varied course, to the amazingly happy and helpful volunteers and great aid stations, this race should continue to grow. Kudos to the race director and staff. Providence rocks!
5.0

By: Priscilla O.

Posted: May 04, 2009

Pretty, peaceful marathon...

I really enjoyed myself at this race. This was a small-town-type marathon, with a handful of spectators and lots of beauty along the way. The first seven miles are rolling, but not much more difficult than a loop around Central Park. The rest of the race is fairly flat. A lot of the course is on a quiet recreational path, with some gorgeous water views. The quiet was almost zen-like. Support on this course was top-notch, from the policemen to the terrific volunteers. I highly recommend staying at the Westin or Courtyard Marriott - can't beat sleeping in and then heading just down the block for the race start! I somehow missed the pizza and beer at the end, so that was a bummer. The technical shirt wasn't bad - it could use a little more color though. I paid extra to get a very cool tie-dye shirt, with my name listed alphabetically on the back. Bravo, Providence! My finish completes my marathons in the Northeast. :-)
4.0

By: Stephanie C.

Posted: May 04, 2009

Very runner-friendly race and amenities

I ran the Cox 1/2 Marathon in both 2008 and 2009. It improved dramatically in that time. It's super organized and there's always help available for your questions. I will run it again.
4.0

By: Rick Muhr

Posted: May 04, 2009

Extremely well organized!

The 2009 marathon was my 35th marathon. If anyone has a qualifying effort in them, I would recommend this race. There are lots of turns, so you have to be engaged. This will prevent you from being lulled into a state of complacency. The terrain offers nice variety. Aid stations always seemed to be there when I needed one. It's nice to see the Providence skyline after 20 miles - a nice reminder that the finish line awaits!
4.0

By: Carol M.

Posted: May 04, 2009

Much improved - go Providence!

I've done both years of the Providence Marathon and I think the organizers really figured it out in Year Two! Nice expo (so much better to have it at a hotel), nice start/finish location (no buses! same place to start and end - woo hoo!), nice course (yay to Barrington), and nice volunteers. Thank you for a challenging run yesterday!
4.0

By: Victor A.

Posted: May 04, 2009

A World-Class Race with a Hometown Feel

As head coach for Dreamfar Newton South and a veteran marathoner and Ironman athlete, I was extremely pleased with the care and support the race gave to its athletes, including our 22 athletes - New England's first high school marathon team. We chose this event because of its timing and availability, but will return to it because of it's hospitality, personalization, and professional organization. It is a fast course with a great tour of Providence, and the run along the bike road has some of the most beautiful scenery I've seen on a marathon course. Highly recommended!
4.0

By: Michael L.

Posted: May 04, 2009

A Good, Reasonably Low-Key Race

I didn't read user comments here regarding 2008 until after I had signed up for 2009, so I was a bit nervous going into the beginning of the race. These fears were largely unfounded. If I could I would give organization 3.5 stars, with points getting knocked off for not having corrals or time markers at the beginning or clear directions or signs for runners at the end. The course itself shows off Providence's varying sights well, with a fair portion of the course winding down a wooded bike path. Good course support with lots of Gatorade and water.
4.0

By: Doug C.

Posted: May 03, 2009

Huge improvement from last year

This year, everything from the expo to the water stops to the course were hugely improved. The course was awesome and well organized. Having done nearly 20 marathons, this was one of my favorites. The first water stop was 1.5 miles into the run and not staffed well enough, but I didn't mind because it was so early in the race that I didn't need water yet. After that, they seemed to be well staffed. I really enjoyed the bike path after some rolling hills along the first half of the course. The live band, pizza, and beer at the end of the race were cool. Much better sponsorship this year also. Overall, I think this will be a super spring marathon for years to come. I hope they keep the course as it is!
3.0

By: Paul C.

Posted: May 03, 2009

Still Growing

I was wary about running this race, based on the comments from 2008. The 2009 version seemed to be much improved from '08 based on those comments. Providence is a nice city, and the people were all extremely hospitable and accommodating. Great Italian food on Federal Hill. Every policeman I encountered had a great sense of humor and was very polite. The expo was decent - not great, but certainly not tiny. I did chuckle about the basement finishing booth. The course started and ended right in front of my hotel, so certainly no complaints there. The majority was run on a bike path through woods and past water (into residential neighborhoods where the folks were really friendly and encouraging). There were lots of turns and switchbacks, but it was not a bad route. Now, the downside. Granted I'm no speedster; I finished around 4:20. But there was ZERO food left!! For the last mile, everyone was cheering, "Just a little farther for pizza and beer!" Well, guess what? No pizza, no bananas, no nothing. Zippo. I guess I have to run faster if I want post-race food. The course could be supported with more water stations I thought. A few times, they seemed sparse. I debated about wearing my water belt, chose not to, and paid for it. I've run 7 half-marathons, and this was my 2nd marathon. The others had better on-course support and tons of post-race food. I'm not sure about the green race part either. There were tons of wasted full Gatorade bottles dumped in the trash. All in all, it was a nice race and I'd run it again. I liked Providence.
3.0

By: Tim Schenck

Posted: May 03, 2009

Nicely Organized, Small Race

I had some concerns based on comments posted about last year's inaugural race. So, before I signed up, I emailed the race director to get his take on what was said. And he got back to me the same day! (Try that at a major marathon.) I was comfortable with his answers and I'm glad that I ran this race. It's not going to have a huge expo or major crowd support (hardly any), but it's a nice, low-key marathon with easy-to-manage logistics. The host hotel was a block away from the start (and cheap, at $149). Definitely worth staying there - and the Starbucks across the street helped. This was my first smaller marathon (after 3 large ones). They're not for everyone, especially if you really feed off of the crowd support. It's tough in those last few miles when you could really use some motivation - at least it was for me. But I did shave 10 minutes off of my PR, so I was thrilled with the result. The course was moderately hilly - actually it seemed a lot gentler than the online elevation chart indicated - with some water views and time spent on a paved bike path. And you certainly can't blame crowds for slowing you down. Some possible improvements: there seemed to be a couple of mile markers missing late in the race (or maybe I was delirious) - though the mileage was spray-painted on the pavement. A few extra water stops would have been nice. Thanks for a nice, small-town race-feel. Everyone I encountered at the expo and on the course was friendly and helpful. And it was great to be able to greet my family immediately after crossing the finish line (even if they refused to hug me in my post-marathon state).
3.0

By: Steven L.

Posted: May 03, 2009

Excellent marathon! Had a blast.

I read a lot of complaints about the previous year so I was a little nervous about this year, but the race director really did a fantastic job! The entire marathon had cones for traffic control as well as a slew of voulunteers and police. The water stations were fully staffed and stocked, and the course was very nice. My only negative was that there was no food tent at the end, but apart from that it was a great race.
5.0

By: Dianna Glass

Posted: October 24, 2008

Loved it!!

I have to say, I wasn't expecting much. It is a first-year, smaller race. I loved it!! I enjoyed the route (hills are good), and the volunteers at water stops and intersections were great. The police on the course were even encouraging runners! Great time; highly recommended.
5.0

By: Lauren L.

Posted: October 09, 2008

Overall Great Experience!

I've run in over 200 races and count this race as one of my top favorites for many reasons. 1) So many happy volunteers along the course. 2) Excellent police presence on the roads. 3) Plenty of aid stations along the course. 4) Good food and music at the finish line. 5) Tons of crowd support, especially considering the weather. 6) Loved finishing in downtown Providence. 7) Race packet pick-up was well organized, quick and easy. With the changes the race director mentioned in his comments, this should be an outstanding race next year!
5.0

By: Julian A.

Posted: October 06, 2008

Great first year for the event

This was the first year for the event and it had a few bugs at the start. It did not help that it was raining. Race started 10 minutes late - waiting for buses to arrive. Probably would not have noticed if the weather were better. Their website says that they are moving the start and finish to downtown Providence, near the Weston. Course had a few hills, but if you live in New England, races have hills. I live in RI and run hills all of the time. Plenty of food and refreshments at finish. If you have not been to RI, you will love Providence and Newport: great restaurants, beautiful ocean. I'll be back again.
3.0

By: Blaine Moore

Posted: July 10, 2008

I enjoyed the race, but there's certainly room to

I heard about the lambasting here in the comments and had to come take a look. I can see where most of the commenters are coming from, although I basically never expect huge support or all the amenities and just treat them as a bonus when I get them. I had heard about the mean cop, but the one that I interacted with was very polite and apologetic. They were trying to hold classes and runners can be a noisy lot. I am going to try to plan on going back. I expect that there will be improvements and it will be cool to see the differences from years 1 to 2.
3.0

By: Jen G.

Posted: July 07, 2008

Opportunities for improvement

I have never had to organize a marathon before, so I don't know how difficult it can be. But I have run them before and this one definitely left out some of the basics. I don't know how well you can judge the future of this marathon based on this one inaugural disaster. Hopefully they have learned from their mistakes and next year will be better. Things to watch out for though: 1. Expo: Sad and little. Don't go expecting to check out apparel, shoes, running gadgets, GU, et cetera, because it's just not there. There were six tents including the packet pick-up area. 2. Race start: I parked at the state house and was bused to the start. I made sure to get there early, since there were only a limited number of free parking spaces. This was unnecessary. Most people did not arrive until much closer to the start of the race. It was a chilly rainy morning (granted not the race director's fault) but we were kicked out of two campus buildings by an overly righteous security guard who made it clear he was not happy to be there. Everyone was lined up about 15 minutes before the race was supposed to start and had to stand there in the rain getting cold and losing motivation. Then the race was delayed about 10 min. because people were still arriving in buses. The beginning of the course was tough; it was crowded and the roads were in bad shape. One girl who looked to be boxed in stepped in a pothole and blew out her ankle in the first mile. 3. Course: The course was difficult. Streets were not adequately blocked and I saw a group of runners almost get taken out by an impatient SUV trying to turn left. One of the aid stations ran out of water and only had grape Gatorade left. Providence is a very scenic and beautiful city; you would not be able to tell that from the views from the course. The half and full both started together; then the halfers split off. The race went quickly downhill after this split. (I mean that proverbially of course; the race course seemed to have twice as many uphills as downhills.) After that, spectators were few and far between, but so were other marathoners for that matter. Some by-standers even seemed confused by what was going on and where people were running to. 4. Finish: The food at the finish was good. There were bananas, Vitamin Waters, crackers, SoyJoy, DD bagels and cookies, and Willowtree chicken salad. There were also massages. And also very few people. It almost seemed deserted. The worst part of the race as a whole was the organization at the finish. There were no buses available to take you back to where your car was parked. I had to ask a cop how to get back to my car. He told me it was about a 20 minutes walk (up the huge hill in front of Prov. Place Mall). I grabbed another cookie for the long haul and began the shuffle back to my car. I like to think of it as a nice cool down and character-building exercise. It also gave me a chance to "bond" with other marathoners who were making the same trek. With a few adjustments, this has the potential to be a decent race. However, as is, it is sort of a disaster marathon.
2.0

By: ed c.

Posted: June 06, 2008

very disappointing

I expected things to be a little shaky being the first one, but this was worse than I imagined. First, the J&W campus was terrible. As a police officer in RI, I was embarrassed by the way the campus cops were treating runners. Inadequate facilities at the start is simply inexcusable. Obviously, a different start location is in order.... The course was disappointing. I love the city of Providence - and most of this race was in East Providence. Maybe I'm spoiled, having run through Chicago and Baltimore, but this course neglects the beauty of Providence. The medal seems like a cheap child's token. Water stops were good, and volunteers were great. Having no gels or anything to eat is a major drawback for me. I was utterly disappointed in my home state's marathon. I want to make this race an annual event and will give it another shot next year, but this race needs to improve. Good thing is there is only one way to go from here....
1.0

By: Andy G.

Posted: May 19, 2008

Room to Grow

I love running in Providence and was excited to see a marathon here. There were areas where the organization needed help though. 1) Paper cups are a must. 2) I don't see why we didn't use the Johnson and Wales athletic facility at the start. I hung out there after being kicked out of the other building. Why were we kicked out exactly? 3) Arrow signs instead of cones will ease directional confusion in a course with so many turns. 4) No 180-degrees turns. As far as the course goes, I would rather see it finish at the start of the cobblestones instead of running over it. Traffic direction was well done, but there need to be bikers leading runners who are out on their own. This doesn't mean a billion bikes with the leader and none with the second-place guy. :)
3.0

By: Runners Thoughts

Posted: May 15, 2008

Good first attempt, but needs improvement

Without the harshness of other comments, I do believe this marathon can become quite good, but needs continued improvement to do so. I don't believe runners realize how hard it is to pull off a marathon organizationally, let alone an innaugural marathon. It is a real challenge. With that said, the areas needed for improvement are: 1) Start/Finish in the same area without the need for buses, especially in this day of $4 gas prices- Providence is compact enough with good access to hotels to do this. 2) Terrain-wise, the course was fair with its combination of uphills and downhills, but we ran on some pretty traffic-congested roads. Volunteers did well at interscetions, but I hated running with the cars beside me and I have to believe that there are nicer areas to run (although the bike path was great!). 3) Start the race earlier - 8 AM at the latest. 4) For the life of me I can't see how anyone associated with running can provide plastic cups which you can't pinch. Paper cups are a must for running stops. Many stations ran out of cups and gave bottles of water or Gatorade (not optimal). If there was nicer weather, some of the other pre-race issues would not have been issues. I thought the sponsorship was pretty decent for a first-event. Overall, it needs improvement, but I suspect so did every other first-time marathon. Baltimore was fantastic at listening to runners since its innaugural in 2001, and is now a premier event.
3.0

By: Monica J.

Posted: May 14, 2008

not great

I ran the half, but I feel everyone's pain. I understand it was the first year, and although most of my comments have already been stated, I feel I need to reiterate: 1) If Johnson and Wales was a sponsor, why did we get kicked out into the rain at the start? They need better organization at the start! 2) Also, handing out full bottles of water and Gatorade is ridiculous! GET CUPS! 3) Don't bus people to the start and not tell them it's miles from the finish; we had to cab it back to the car! 4) Get different medals for the 5K/half/marathon - no wonder they ran out! 5) Need more porta-potties. i ran the half and didn't need them, but if I had run the full, I would be very upset at the lack of porta-johns.
1.0

By: Bob O.

Posted: May 14, 2008

Disappointing, disappointing, disappointing

From the weather, to the hospitality, to the course, even to the medal, this race was a disappointment. First, to call the day before an "expo" was a stretch. They had four tents in the rain with nothing much to offer. Then the day of the race, they send in the Providence gestapo to throw preparing runners out in the rain before the race. I watched a poor woman going into a vacant hallway to retrieve her belonging only to be yelled at by a police officer stating, "What part of 'get out of the building' don't you understand," with other armed police yelling at runners as if they were breaking up a protest sit-in. The kicker was that they threw us out in the rain and then didn't start the race on time or provide adequate bathrooms or port-a-potties for the runners. The race was poorly attended and for the most part runners had to circumvent traffic the whole race, with race volunteers constantly forcing runners to the side of roads, into potholes full of rain water. There was one stretch of the run where we were along the water and had to contend with vagrants and their trash along the road - incentive enough to keep running, so as not to be mugged. The incentive music set up at the end of the race was a 1/4-mile from the finish, so I started my stride to the end a block away, not realizing I had to run through a quiet back alley to get to the finish. I had to ask for help three times, before a volunteer reluctantly helped me with my chip and provided a medal, which did not reflect any difference between the 1/2, 5K, or marathon. Now, I'm not trying to be an egomaniac, but I would like to receive a medal that at least states I ran a marathon. Also it took them 20 minutes to round up my gear, so I stood there in the cold, no blanket provided, in shorts, tightening up like a drum, until someone final located my things. Luckily I had booked a room at the Biltmore Hotel and only had to limp a couple of blocks back for relief; I feel bad for the people who had a mile hike to their cars. The only shining light was that although the course was very hilly, I did run a PR - to my surprise. I guess adversity is the mother of success here. Anyway, that's my take. I will not return to this one.
2.0

By: Ed C.

Posted: May 13, 2008

Good first effort - has great potential

If this was organized like Big Sur, it would be a great party. Cons: 1) Start was hidden by buildings, and no general directions were given at the campus; 2) One campus cop was not nice, but the other one did try to be diplomatic; 3) Number and location of port-o-lets; 4) Few volunteers at the aid stations. Pros: 1) The hilly (lots of small ones) course was fun; 2) The RD is responsive to questions; 3) The last mile was like running into a European city; 4) The finish wasn't that far from my hotel. Suggestions: 1) Place the start near an open field and position the runner's village close by; 2) Possibly have a detour around miles 2-3; 3) A finish at the state house would be grand. I enjoyed my short visit in Providence. Thanks to the RD and the city for holding the race!
3.0

By: LuAnne R.

Posted: May 12, 2008

My worst marathon experience yet!

This was only my second time running a first-year marathon and I think it cured me from ever doing it again. So many things to address: The worst problem was the minimal amount of bathrooms/porta johns for the amount of runners (lines a mile long!), and the lack of shelter for runners waiting to start in the chilly, pouring rain. My next biggest disappointment was the lack of crowd support- virtually none. Then again, out of the the 4000 runners I was told by the race director had registered, only 500-600 ran the full marathon, so you were literally out there on your own. This was especially hard on me mentally as I found the course to be the most challenging (hills, hills and more hills!) of all my eight previous marathons. By mile 24 (the steepest hill on the course), I was in tears. Another problem I encountered was the lack of water at a few of the water stops. I wear a fuel belt but only supply it with Accelerade, expecting the water stops to keep me supplied with water. At mile 23 I desperately needed water to take a gel, was told they had none and was offered grape Gatorade- horrible choice of flavors! It was sickeningly sweet and made me feel nauseous. To add insult to injury, after finally crossing the finish line of this grueling race (in the worst condition I've ever finished), I had no idea where my car was, and no one 9(not even the policemen) could give me clear directions back to the State House parking lot where we met the shuttle buses that morning. I roamed around the city for almost an hour, and I'd guess that it was at least a mile away from the finish area. Very poor planning! If that's the only parking arrangements the race directors could make, they should have at least offered a shuttle service back to the designated lots. I would never recommend this marathon to anyone, and will certainly not go back myself.
2.0

By: Tsuyoshi O.

Posted: May 10, 2008

Organization should review for next year.

I have completed 11 marathons, and this was the worst. 1. Shuttle bus stop is not clear at finish line. I asked the staff and police department but nobody knew the information. 2. Shuttle bus did not take my family to the finish line after the race started. 3. The start line was problematic, and there were too few toilets. There was a long line, even though the starting time was delayed. After starting, a computer chip guy shouted that we should start right away, so many people lost the chance to use the bathroom. 4. Most water stop did not provide sports drink. 5. At the finish line, they did not provide chairs. It was difficult to take off a computer chip. 6. The course (full marathon) was tough, especially after 19 miles. There were several hills. The participation fee was high, but the organization was worst. I'll never do the race again unless they make some changes.
2.0

By: T. J.

Posted: May 09, 2008

More WATER

Not a good marathon for first-time marathoners, especially if you're going to take 5-plus hours. A lonely road. Having everyone wait 25-30 minutes out in the pouring rain at the start was poor planning. Way too many hills. Up and down the entire time. No water left at water stops until mile 9!!! You had to search for a finisher's medal when you crossed the finish line; they were on the bandstand a distance from the finish line.
2.0

By: Denise R.

Posted: May 08, 2008

Providence is great; race needs work

This was my 47th marathon. The expo was extremely limited. Lots of very polite student volunteers who were not very informed about the race. Technical, short-sleeve t-shirt, but ugly logo from Cox. No parking at the start. No information about when the buses bringing us to the start were going to stop. The only info was that they were starting to shuttle folks over the 3-mile distance at 7 a.m. for the 9 a.m. start. I took the 7 a.m. shuttle and looked for a place to wait in the rain at the Johnson and Wales campus. The security guards at Johnson and Wales were unaware that a few thousand runners were coming. They kicked us out into the rain. Not enough port-o-johns at the start. No information on the local news or in the local newspapers about road closures, and hence road rage from drivers backed up at the intersections (and not enough police to help with traffic). Maybe start the race earlier to avoid this in the future. The course was extremely hilly throughout, but pretty in spots. I stayed at the Biltmore Hotel, which was close to the finish line and very nice to allow for late check out. My biggest complaint: really ugly, backwards, cheap medal with the Cox logo on the front and a poorly done imprint of the Rhode Island statehouse on the back. Providence is a pretty city in a great state that has a lot to offer; please fix this race for next year.
2.0

By: Claire G.

Posted: May 08, 2008

Inaugural race shows potential

The best part of the weekend was the pasta dinner the night before the race. The culinary school at the University did a great job with the food, and the opportunity to visit with Boston legends Bill Rodgers and Geoff Smith was amazing. For a first time marathon, I thought the race went fairly smoothly. For out-of-towners, having the Expo at a location that you can't walk to from the downtown hotels was a nuisance - I had to rent a car to get my race packet. I'm hesitant to call it an Expo, because there really wasn't anything to see or do at the Expo - I had to ask somebody where to find a running store so I could purchase a few items for the race. There were no size small technical shirts, so I ended up with a cotton shirt that was meant for the 5-K participants. The course was somewhat challenging - many more long stretches of uphill than I had expected. The race packet didn't include a course profile, so I was caught off- guard with how hilly the course was. There was a real shortage of volunteers at the water stations - more often than not, I needed to grab my own water off a table as there weren't people to hand them to me. Many of the roads were not closed, and we were expected to run behind cones on the shoulder of the road. There were police officers letting traffic cut through between runners, which was dangerous - I almost got hit by a car that hesitated when the police officer told him to go. There was definitely a shortage of port-a-potties both at the start and along the course. The medal at the finish was pretty small and cheesy - same medal whether you ran the half or the full. Oh, and I got a Soy Joy bar and a banana at the finish as I never saw any other food, which was very disappointing after running 26 miles! Despite my complaints, these are all easy-to-fix type of problems. The course itself is quite pretty, particularly the portion run on a bike trail along some body of water. The course was well marked, the size of the race meant you always had some company, and the temperature was perfect.
3.0

By: Blaine Moore

Posted: May 08, 2008

Great Race - Room for Improvement

I really enjoyed the race and think that the race organizers did a pretty good job putting it on. For my own experience, things went really well, but I definitely heard some grumbles from people a bit farther back than I was. Course: 5 Stars - Great route. Roads could use some repairs, but I enjoyed the hill placement. Organization: 3 Stars - Good, but a lot of room for improvement. Spectators: 3 Stars - Spectators were awesome, but there weren't very many. And it seemed like everybody that was in town who wasn't a runner or a spectator had a stick up their rear end.
4.0

By: Stephanie D.

Posted: May 08, 2008

A little disappointed

This was my 3rd marathon this year, and I was a little disappointed in the "Providence" (if it can be called that) Marathon. The course itself was challenging. which was great, but the route left a lot to be desired. It was confusing running on the right side, then the left side, then having to cut traffic off to cross MAJOR intersections. Mile 4 ran out of water after I passed because the volunteers, by no fault of their own, could not keep up with filling the cups on the table, so all the runners were grabbing the small bottles and taking off. From what I could tell when I went through, there were only about 5 cases in total. Although the course roads were open, there was no way for people to get through (as I said before) because we had to keep criss-crossing the road. My spectator couldn't get to me again from mile 3 until mile 22, and the volunteers (traffic control) were not able to give her information on their current location or how to get where she needed to go. The best part was the last mile or so which was the only time we were in Downton Providence. I'm not sure about the post-race refreshments etc, since I didn't stick around. One last thing: The medical tents did not have vasoline,which was a key item to have. For a first time race, all in all, I think it was okay. There are just some things to consider for next year.
2.0

By: Steve S.

Posted: May 08, 2008

This was the worst race I have ever been to!

I have been to many races, and this was the worst managed race I have ever been to in my life! I am really trying to remain objective here; I understand that this was a first time event, but it was such a mess all around that I just can't help but share my feelings about how bad it was. It was actually so bad that I don't even know where to begin. I'll start with the bathroom situation: There were over 2,000 runners and their family members at the start (maybe 2,500 people total) and only 15 portable toilets! 15! That's over 160 people per toilet. At an average time of 2 minutes per person, that's almost a 6 hour wait per toilet. I am sure there were toilets inside all those college buildings; too bad the security guards would not allow us in the buildings to use them. Oh yes, and it was raining (on and off), and there were no shelters for us. I would have waited in my car, but they wouldn't let us park near the start. I had to drive about 20 minutes away and take a bus to the start. When the race finally started, it was well over 10 minutes late! Then there is the "fast, flat, and scenic waterfront" race course (at least that's what the website said when I registered). The website said the course was scenic! Where was the scenery? Perhaps it was referring to the scary ghetto neighborhoods we ran through? Fast and flat? The course was NOT flat! Some of those (SEVERAL LARGE) long, steep hills had a gradient of more than 15 degrees. Flat? That is a downright lie! Oh and waterfront? I didn't see much of that either. Do I even need to remind anyone about the drink situation? There were two water stations that were out of water and/or Gatorade. There are less than 1,000 marathoners and you run out of drinks? What is this, Chicago all over again? There was also nothing to be had at the finish either! Let's talk about traffic control: There was none! I almost got hit by several cars in some of the intersections because there was NO ONE providing traffic control at some of the major road intersections. When I finally finished this Godawful event, I had to chase down a volunteer and demand a medal; they were not putting them around our necks as we finished. I also had no help taking off my chip. I just ran 26 miles and could barely stand up or move, and I had to deal with the chip. Every marathon I have ever been to has had people that take care of that for you. There were supposed to be awards somewhere, but none of the people working at the race knew where that was, so I finally said, "enough is enough" and left. If you are looking for a race to run next May, I would highly recommend that you find another race besides this one. The people who put on this race have no clue how to run an event!
1.0

By: none n.

Posted: May 07, 2008

Need more improvements!!!

The race was well organized, but did not have enough Gatorade drink stations. I expected energy drinks to be present every 2 or 3 miles after the 8-mile mark, but I found only 4 stops (mile 6.5, 8.5, 19.5 and 23.5). The post-race food was great. I hope next year will get better. A good lesson to be learned.
3.0

By: shane t.

Posted: May 07, 2008

Good potential suffers from terrible organization.

It's nobody's fault that it rained. It is, however, someone's fault that there weren't enough buses to transport runners to the starting line on time. It is someone's fault that due to the afore-mentioned delay, runners waited in the rain for a 10 minute delayed start. It is someone's fault that the cops kicked runners out of buildings so that runners had nowhere dry to wait. I checked the weather two weeks in advance; why couldn't the race director? Also, the line to the port-o-johns was as long as the marathon itself. The high points of the course were along a bike path and the last mile in downton Providence. Traffic control was lacking, as in some spots it consisted of a pre-teen child holding an orange flag and wishing runners good luck from the sidewalk. It was nice to have the half-marathoners diverged by mile 8 so marathoners don't get sucked out too fast. The spectators were few on such a dreary day but the one's out were terrific. A group with yellow "Cat" shirts were especially encouraging and boisterous. By far the best part of this race was the Gatorade rainbow. Almost every marathon, half marathon, and ultra I have ever run has had lemon-lime Gatorade; I am so sick of lemon-lime Gatorade. This race had a plethora of Gatorade options including purple, red, orange, and I think I even saw blue once. Rock out!
3.0

By: bob s.

Posted: May 07, 2008

First race produced some good, some bad

This is the inaugural edition of this race, so I list it by positives and negatives, knowing that you do cut a little slack with a marathon's first time. Negatives: Arriving at approximately 8:15 AM and with it drizzling outside, runners made their way into both of the 2 J+W buildings only to be kicked out by the most arrogant and rude security officer on the campus. He found me and 30 others waiting on the 2nd floor and he was angry and curt, yelling at us; I was glad he wasn't armed! We all moved to the other building only to be kicked out of there as well by the same Dirty Harry security officer. With that in addition to the drizzle, people weren't making it to the start line early enough. Retrospectively, it did get us to the start, but people sure were upset with his attitude - I mean it wasnt like we were unruly students! :) - Race start of 9:00 AM means 9:00 AM not 9:16AM! I made sure I was all set, arriving there in time and getting my potty breaks in order for the timely start. One thing I could see holding up the start was the line of runners still waiting to use the porta-johns situated in the front of the starting line (suggestion: next year put the potties at the back of the starting line to make it much easier). Also, it looked like a few buses were very late arriving. Might I suggest announcing a cutoff on the shuttle times (8:15AM?) to make everyone committed to getting to shuttle stops earlier? - As a back-of-the-pack marathoner (10+ minute pace), I did not get water on 2 of the first few stops, since they ran out of it. Being a 48 degree day there was no excuse to run out of water. People were looking to run into a convenience store to buy their own, as they were not sure what was going to be available down the course. The good thing is that after those 2 instances, they had plenty of water and Gatorade for the rest of the race. - Traffic management was fair except in the last few miles, where I had to defend myself against a couple of cars wanting to move me over. That was where there were no police or volunteers to steer them around the course. In the final mile, cars were following me on the brick road - not a way to feel secure over the last mile. - Again for us at the back of the pack, they ran out of medals at the finish! I don't know how many same-day registrations you get for a marathon, but I saw the list and it appeared to be 50+; that is almost 10% of the 595 finishers. It should never have happened. Positives - For me, the course layout was great! There were lots of rolling hills to break up the monotony. It is New England, so expect some hills; it makes it fun! There was also enough scenery to make it interesting. - Every single one of the volunteers were wonderful! On a drizzly, damp day you don't have a lot of crowd support, so the volunteers helped along the way. Almost every kid with a flag directing traffic gave me some words of encouragement. To all of you, thank you! Even when I met up with some unruly drivers trying to get through the course in spite of us runners, a couple of volunteers were angrier with the driver than I was (but in good humour). - Weather (after the first 5-10 minutes of heavy rain at the start): The weather was absolutely perfect for running a marathon - 48 degrees and overcast, with a variable wind! - It was a good race setup running with the half-marathon group for the first eight miles. This gave me some company for the first third of the race and when we spilt up, I could start concentrating on my race with a smaller crowd. - I liked the bike path part of the race. There was just enough alone time for me to get through the first of what seemed multiple walls. Overall, it was a good show of a first marathon for these sponsors, and if they can change a few logistics (and give that security officer the day off next time), this marathon has potential.
4.0

By: Kerry C.

Posted: May 07, 2008

Providence deserves better

I ran the half marathon, and the race itself was a major disappointment. The race could not control the weather, but other aspects were poorly planned. I was rudely kicked out of a building at Johnson and Wales, and sent outside in the rain where there were only 15 portable toilets for far too many runners. Some of the water stops did not have any water, and there were not enough water stops to make up for that. There were several intersections that needed better traffic control - a car taking a left-hand turn across the course is far too dangerous. The course itself provided a good way to see the city, but did it have to include two strip clubs? In short, I won't be back. It's a shame that a city such as Providence, which has come so far, does not have a first-class running event.
2.0

By: kristen D.

Posted: May 07, 2008

room for improvement

This was my 15th marathon and I've done some very large (5 Boston's) and some small. Overall, it was a nice race, and the fans I came across were very supportive and helpful. I do have one complaint: if Johnson and Wales wanted to sponsor, they should have been prepared for the weather and allowed access to the buildings. I arrived early and was abruptly thrown out of a building. (The security guard was not only abrupt, but downright rude - even going into the women's room to tell runners to "get out.") Instead we had to stand in the rain for 45 minutes until the race started. I suggest that if they sponsor next year, they be prepared to be more welcoming. That experience just left a bad impression of Johnson and Wales University.
3.0

By: Nora P.

Posted: May 07, 2008

Lots of potential

For an inaugural race, this was a very good race. The organizers obviously could not do anything about the rain or the humidity that followed. Some clear positives: *Contact from the race directors was frequent via email. Good website. *Pickup on Saturday ran smoothly *Spectators weren't that numerous, but I have never depended on them and those that came out were enthusiastic *I knew most of the course, which was very relaxing *Plenty of water stops *Some very nice stretches and a great finish downtown A few suggestions: *Starting late was not cool, especially because I had told friends to expect me at certain times along the course. *Was there any food at the finish line? I finished under 4 hours and didn't see any. *The section in East Providence was really, really long and not that scenic. This could definitely be improved. *The medal was cool. I think it would be even cooler if every year, the organizers picked a different image (i.e., Federal Hill, Brown, etc.) so that runners could "collect them all." I would run this race again, and I think it has the potential to be a very strong marathon for Rhode Island.
3.0

By: J. B.

Posted: May 07, 2008

Well-run for first time

This was my first Half Marathon, but I have run many races in the past. To address another comment: Yes, we were kicked out of the buildings at the beginning of the race and there was an immense lack of restrooms. The building issue has to do more with the host-site, Johnson & Wales Univ, but I do blame the lack of port-o-johns on the race directors. It was pouring so there was a necessity to change indoors, and to a certain extent, we weren't given that opportunity. The race did start 10 minutes late, but it was not a big deal. There was a fair amount of spectators for such a dreary day (chilly if youre just standing there), although the rain did subside about 10 minutes after the start. The course was well-designed, although the finish was nowhere near the start, so you needed to check your bag at the start and it was shuttled to the finish for you. That went smoothly. There was no parking at the start line, so they urged you to park downtown (near the finish) and they provided shuttles to the start, which again ran smoothly; they provided approximately 1,000 free spaces downtown. As for the course, there was one hairpin turn which I thought wasn't necessary; they could have moved the start back or the finish up to eliminate that. There were plenty of water stops, seemingly every couple of miles or so. Every mile was CLEARLY marked by a large sign and paint on the pavement. The hydration given at the end was so-so. They had very small (10 oz maybe?) bottles of water that they were giving out at the end, and I had to take 2. They were giving out 16 oz Gatorade too, but some waves of finishers received them, and some didn't (I don't know why). So when my wave finished and I found out they were giving those out, I had to jump back and get them. Overall, a few minor things went wrong -one major (bathroom issue)- but it went very well considering it was the first year running it.
4.0

By: Michelle S.

Posted: May 07, 2008

Good inaugural race

I ran the half, and I thought that overall the race was pretty well-organized, for a first-time race. Problems: not enough bathrooms at the start, and most of the runners didn't even realize there were porta-potties at the start line, so we were going into J&W campus buildings, and rudely getting kicked out. Course was good, but very hilly and challenging. It would be nice if the first two miles weren't through one of the ugliest parts of the city, but the rest of the course showed off some very nice parts of Providence. I thought spectators were great, and especially given the lousy weather, was impressed with how many people showed up to cheer runners on. Bag pickup at finish was a bit chaotic, and could be run better, but a volunteer who saw I was having trouble quickly stepped in and helped me. Volunteers were great throughout the race, although I did hear that some water stops ran out of water. A few tweaks to be made for next year, but I would definitely run this race again.
4.0

By: Roger Marquis

Posted: May 06, 2008

Providence Marathon - Nice Job

I've run 10 marathons in 2006, 15 in 2007, and four already in 2008, for a total of 29 in the past 2-plus years. I would rank this race in the middle of the pack of marathons that I have completed. This may not sound like a resounding voice of approval, but I really have nothing bad to say about this race. It did not wow me as much as some other races. The organizational team did fine in their first year with this marathon. The course, fan and spectators were about the same as any other small to mid-size marathon. The water stations were well stocked, and the volunteers and participants I met in the Providence area were extremely nice. I think this race will get even better with age. I think that, beyond anything that I may have written, the finest compliment I can give this race is that I will run this it again in 2009, and I will recommend it to others.
3.0

By: Jay W.

Posted: May 06, 2008

Hilly course; very well done for the first year

This was my first marathon, so I have nothing to compare it to, but I was impressed at how well-organized things were for a first-time marathon. Despite only 600 or so signing up for the marathon, I thought traffic control was very good, the course guides were very good, the water stops were well-staffed and well-stocked, and the fans were great. The course was a little hilly, but not bad at all and it went through some nice neighborhoods and along the bay. Registration was easy and getting to the start line was no problem. A few small complaints: 1) the woman who could not remember the words to the National Anthem (the runners picked up where she left off and finished the song for her- very funny). 2) a 3.2 mile stretch without water (from 16.5 to 19.7) was a bit too long without water at that point in the race, 3) the medals were a little too rinky-dink, 4) race day was cold and rainy, but the Johnson and Wales security kicked us out of the buildings before the race. Finishing through downtown Providence was nice, though the cobblestone streets were rough on the feet! I would run this race again; I expect it will get bigger as word gets around.
4.0

By: Julie W.

Posted: May 06, 2008

Well run inaugural race

I flew up from FL to do this marathon since I have friends and family in the area. Since it was the first year and the weather was horrible I really didn't know what to expect. I have to say that RI people are awesome! There were so many fans and volunteers out even though it was cold and rainy. I give the spectators 5 stars just for the fact that they were out in such yucky weather. Since it was such a small field I almost felt famous because people were yelling my number as I passed by. The race was really well run. I guess some people might complain that they moved us from one building to the next and then outside in the rain to wait for the start, but at least we got to wait inside for a while and use regular bathrooms. It was a tough course for me since it was really hilly, but I ended up getting my best time by far. The last 2 miles or so are downhill - I think that helps. Also, the cops were great about directing traffic away from the race. It seems that the race directors put a lot of thought into the race and I hope to see more people running it next year. Good job.
4.0

By: Jaclyn O.

Posted: May 06, 2008

Wonderful first marathon experience!

What a great race! Although this was my first marathon, I have done several races before this, and I have to say this was one of the most organized. Never once from the moment I signed up to the end of the race did I ever feel lost (except for driving around Providence, but that changed by the end of my stay). I always felt well- informed and confident. Being my first full marathon, I was pretty tense and nervous, so having everything run smoothly was a big part of keeping this race stress-free. The many volunteers and police also did such a WONDERFUL job of keeping us safe, on-course, and well-hydrated (the placement of the many aid stations were perfect). Cox did a wonderful job.
4.0

By: Jen B.

Posted: May 05, 2008

More Water Please!!

I ran the half-marathon, and could not believe the lack of everything. We were kicked out of 2 buildings at the start in the pouring rain, there were NOT enough port-o-johns at the start, there was NO WATER a miles 4 and 6, there was hardly any Gatorade, and some of the volunteers didn't know what the heck was going on. I know it was the first-time this was run, but you really need to address and fix these problems if you want anyone else to run this next year. No spectators - I'm assuming it was due to the weather - and I almost was run over by an upset driver, due to a HUGE lack of police/traffic control presence.
1.0

By: alan s.

Posted: May 05, 2008

a lack of planning and thought!!!!!!!!!!

This must be the Cox's organizations first marathon. The late water stops ran out of cups.......giving a runner a whole bottle of gatorade to sip on and then discard is neither economic or sensible. They ran out of medals.The start was at the J&W University,the finish downtown,BUT the buses left from the State Capital [free parking].Do the organizers really think that having finished a marathon, people want to walk 10 or so blocks to their car???The course was OK,the initial 2 miles were somewhat rough.On a plus note..there was plenty of food for the late runners.I am not sure of the rational for a 9am start,or for the Sat expo closing at 4pm,although packet pick up was available prior to the start.
2.0

By: Dave Z.

Posted: May 05, 2008

Decent first effort.

Course: Some very pretty places, 2 pretty ugly places, lots of little hills. Excellent people support during the race, but water tables were dry for the slower runners before the 1/2 marathon split off. The logistics are kind of tough for a small race. The shuttle bus rides to the start took forever and finding my car at the end of the race was a challenge. For an out of towner, downtown Providence feels like the maze at the end of 'The Shining'. Starting and finishing near free parking would be a welcoming gesture. The boxed food at the end was better than average. Not many spectators which isn't unusual for a new race. Some of the urban neighborhoods could provide some in the future, but industrial areas, choke & pukes (4 lane commercial roads) and the really pretty bike path probably never will. Keep the bike path!
3.0

By: mary kay w.

Posted: May 05, 2008

great course organization needs some tweeking

the course was a beautiful rolling hills course that takes you through some very pretty parts of Providence I did not know we were even there. Finish line had lots of good food and spectators, but no directions on where to go for food and drink you had to ask around. no help getting chips off either ouch!!! Start it was pouring rain and they aggressively threw everyone out of the building we were waiting in, about an hour and half before the race which was delayed for twenty minutes because the shuttle buses were late arriving. No communication to the runners that were waiting. I spoke with a woman at the end of the race who tried to stop because she was ill she went to the aid station workers for help they did not know what to do and sent her to a cop who said he did not know what to do. She stopped in a coffee shop and some kind man bought her tea and gave her cab fare back to the finish, NICE to know there are good samaritans in the world!! This can be a great race just needs some more organization and better communication to volunteers on help plans.
3.0

By: jay b.

Posted: May 05, 2008

Tough Course Set-Up

This was a local race for me and I had high hopes for the run. It was raining (pouring) at the start and the race started 10 minutes late. The course has uphills and downhills throughout, with two or three short and steep sections between miles 19 and 24. Tough finishing hills. OK organization for a first-year race; I hope it will get better next year.
3.0

By: Steve F.

Posted: May 05, 2008

Great spectators, poor organization

Pros: A challenging, but fair course. (Can you tell I PR'd?) Great pizza, and lots of it, at the finish. Best of all, a surprising number of surprisingly enthusiastic spectators. Cons: Starting-area Port-a-lets positioned in front of the start line...unbelievable. Undersized, undermanned and understocked water stations. And brittle plastic cups? The kind you can't pinch to prevent water shooting up you nose? Bad. Bad. Bad. Also, the whole bag-check scheme was a fiasco, unorganized, understaffed and totally insecure. At both the start and finish. Anyone could have picked up anyone's stuff and walked away unnoticed. Lastly, the post-race booths were in a muddy lot. A final suggestion for the organizers: the 1000 reserved parking spaces were nearly a mile from the finish, not the kind of walk folks want to make following a marathon or half. Please consider having the finish line be closer to the parking.
4.0

By: Ray C.

Posted: May 04, 2008

Feeble First Attempt

8 portable toilets for almost 4,000 runners! That should say it all. No water and most water stations, very few spectators, course only partially closed to traffic. Johnson & Wales, theoretically a sponsor, had guards and school administrators chasing runners from buildings and grounds prior to the race... I appreciate the attempt to establish a race in this beautiful little city, but this was a poor first attempt. Not enough volunteers by half, intersections not blocked, traffics blowing horns at runners and cutting through and groups of leering men outside of topless clubs. I give the course a 4 because one can't deny the scenery along the river, the historic architecture and so forth. I really hope they get their act together. This could be a very cool race, but it wasn't what it was advertised as.
2.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide