Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Rock 'n' Roll USA Marathon (formerly the National Marathon)
Back

Rock 'n' Roll USA Marathon (formerly the National Marathon) - Race Reviews

3.2
Average rating based on 286 Reviews

By: Allen B.

Posted: March 11, 2019

horrible course, no crowd support, poor org

The 2019 DC Rock n Roll was by far the worst marathon course I've experienced. The course went through ugly parts of town and not past any of the monuments or sights. The course was point to point, mostly uphill. There was zero crowd support. Poor swag. Cheesy medal. 33f at start and zero warming stations. On the upside, plenty of water tables. RnR races are becoming money grabs - not worth the entry fee - save it for Marine Corp.
2.0

By: Andrew Y.

Posted: March 13, 2018

Solid Race environment that can be improved

This race was my first marathon, and was a good experience overall. The expo was held the Thursday/Friday before and was a phenomenal experience. It was held at the D.C. Armory and was organized incredibly well. There were a lot of diverse booths selling march, gu, watches, etc. and it was very well done. The first 14 miles of the race were really cool to have on the course! Started out by the White House, and ran alongside a lot of D.C. staple sights (Lincoln Memorial, JFK Center, Watergate) before heading toward Rock Creek park. From there, runners start to run through the neighborhoods of D.C., which really gave me a cool perspective on the city I hadn't previously seen. The race itself was definitely geared more toward the half-marathon, as miles 15-23 of this race are pretty brutal. This section of the race was mostly run on the highway, essentially doing an out and back towards Maryland/National Harbor. Some more course support would have definitely been helpful here. On the back half of the out-and-back, there were some pretty gnarly hills between miles 21-24 that were a real gut check. I can't say enough about Rock and Roll's onsite medical staff. I was having some problems with my IT bands around Mile 24, and they wrapped my knees up quickly and carefully to get me back onto the course. They were super responsive and did a great job. The finisher area was great! There was a ton of support by the finish line, and they had a lot of great amenities at the finisher area, including a marathon recovery zone. Also, the gear they were selling at the merch tents were great. All in all, this was a positive experience running this race with a lot of great aspects, but I feel it could be improved with a bit more attention to the course by RNR. They should try to incorporate more of the staple D.C. sights like the Jefferson Memorial or some of the places along the Army 10 Miler course. Also, if you're running this race, train for hills! It was unexpectedly hilly, especially in the last hour of the race. Overall, this race was fun, but not without its flaws.
4.0

By: Vamsi V.

Posted: March 12, 2018

Very poorly organized

Overall, I am very disappointed with the race organization. It starts with a minimal to almost no swag packet pickup. They made everyone go thru several flight of stairs just to grab the race bib and then walk back up to the expo. This was probably the only marathon (of my 30+ big races) where there was zero swag. The full and half marathons had staggered start times and followed separate courses. I guess this kept the course to be less crowded and it would have been nicer if the half marathoners joined later in the course to provide a sense of motivation for the full marathoners. There were some steep hills around mile 23 and several of the marathoners were having hard time pushing thru at the end. The gels provided on the course were disgusting to say the least. I never tasted a gel that was that horrible and had to spit out right away with the disgusting taste. They had 'food' at mile 24 which was unripe green bananas... Seriously! At the finish line, there was so much confusion and no one to really usher finishers thru the runners village. It was windy and cold and I really wanted a mylar blanket and it took 10mins of asking around and finally sighting it at a distance. There was no food or any kind of indication of what was provided and it felt like for ever to sight a small food truck with Pizza that only provided a quarter slice of pizza. I was also planning on getting a massage but no one seemed to have a clue. All in all, this was my first Rock n Roll and will surely be my last one. I was expecting a great show put up by this organization and was shocked at how poorly they organized... TOO much HYPE...
2.0

By: john m.

Posted: March 13, 2017

Changed the course once again

Out is a nice trip to Arlington Cemetary; in is a BRUTAL 4.2 mile finishing section. They seem to tinker with the course every year, and this year it was poorly thought out. All RNR races tend to concentrate on the half marathon with the marathon as an afterthought, no different here. The half course was scenic enough and was, generally a very good course. The last 4 miles miles of the marathon were by far the courses' toughest 4 miles, and that should never occur at a marathon. The 20mph headwinds are no fault of the race committee, but why in the world are they putting in a mile long significant hill in the 22 and 23 mile range?
3.0

By: Eric K.

Posted: March 10, 2017

Steep Hill In Latter Stages Of Full Marathon!

The various reasons to run the Washington DC Rock & Roll marathon. 1. As a marathon in March, it is a perfect race for many of those (like myself) who live in the snowy Northeast, Midwest and Northwest respectively. A March race forces you/one to keep training through the winter months instead of hibernating, keeping you well trained and toned throughout the year, meaning that when majority of the races in Spring start, you shall be ahead of those who didn't train through the winter. It was a relatively cool 50 degrees on average in 2016 but it was below freezing some years before so just beware. 2. If you are doing the 50 marathons in 50 states challenge, this is probably one of the only two marathons held in Washington DC proper (The other is the Bikila memorial marathon in September) that you can use to cross the District of Columbia off your list if that's your wish! You can also pay for a 3 city 'Global Tour pass' which enables you to run for 3 races in any rock 'n' roll event worldwide and the 'unlimited' global tour pass which allows you to run in any of the rock 'n' roll races worldwide. This may be a money saver in the 50 marathons in 50 states challenge instead of paying for individual fees for individual city races. 3. The capital city is a must-visit for out-of-towners and residents alike. A runner could take advantage of this marathon to visit the White House and the many monuments and historical sites. 4. As a large city, accommodation, transport to and from the city and other amenities are available. It is an expensive city to stay, travel and dine in, so be warned. 5. It is one of the more picturesque races you shall run in. You get to start in downtown DC and run through the streets and see the monuments while running. You also get to run through some DC neighborhoods and then finish close to the DC Armory, close to the soccer stadium. 6. As a rock 'n' roll event, they have musical entertainment at various places during the race itself and there is entertainment at the finish line tent. 7. They offer a finisher jacket in addition to a finisher medal, which is quite nice. Reasons not to run the Washington DC Rock & Roll Marathon. 1. This is the only major reason I could think of. It's a very hilly race! Its the hilliest race I have ever run! You need to see and run those hills to experience it. This race caters for the half-marathoners. Full marathoners are an afterthought. This is definitely an ironman worthy run if that's your type of thing. The hills from mile 16 and 22 are Everest steep! It's not the ideal race to try and get a PR (personal record) or BQ (Boston Qualifier) as your finishing time shall be significantly slower than your other finishing times. There is another race in Washington DC (Bikila memorial marathon) that is held in September which may be less hilly. 2. Full marathoners and half marathoners start at the same time, slightly contesting the start line. I don't mind running with half marathoners, some people do. However, the corrals solve this problem somewhat. The Expo. - If you can, (and are traveling from out of state/town) drop your bags in the hotel room/host's house before coming to the expo. The expo is quite exhausting if you bring in your heavy luggage. (Like I did) There is also security at the entrance that checks the bags and the security lines are long. - Don't try to come late on Friday evening. (The last day) Get your bib as early as possible. The lines were impossibly long on Friday evening and traffic towards the DC armory and parking was a nightmare! - If you are raising money via St Jude's and made a pledge, you pick your bib from a separate St Jude's booth. As I was passing by, I saw a runner who hadn't fully paid up their contribution pledge and they wouldn't release their bib until all the pledges were paid off. Getting to the expo. The expo is held on two days, Thursday and Friday. I went to the expo on Friday, March 11, 2016. You can get to the expo in quite a number of ways; driving (and looking for parking, very rare and expensive in DC) taxi/über/lyft or using the Metro Bus/subway system. Use travel apps (google maps, maps on Apple/Android) to map out your route for Thursday and Friday (but not Saturday as the metro operates differently on race day) if using the DC metro or bus system. Buy a smart card and load it with $20-25 (more if you'll do more traveling) if you are just going to the expo, hotel room/home, starting line next day and from the finish line back to your hotel/home. It's easier than fumbling for cash and in some stations, you might not be able to get in with cash and without the card. It simplifies your life. It's easier to use the metro subway but you can also use the bus. I took bus #96 from Union Station and bus # 97 from the Armory, which buses bring you within 3 minutes of the entrance to the armory. The exit is 'Stadium Armory Station', junction of 19th St and Capitol Street stop. The stop is a big stop. From Union Station, take the buses to 'Capitol Heights' station and from 'Station/Armory Station' take the bus to Union Station. The DC subway uses a system where you pay at the end of the ride at the subway exit. This is the largest expo I have ever been part of. It is held in the DC Armory, the size of a football field or two! The expo is quite organized. This is where you get reminded that the Rock 'n' Roll is a for profit organization. Insurance companies, car companies, athletic apparel companies, sports nutrition, food vendors, you name it, all vendors are represented. Some people take offense to this type of commercialism but it doesn't faze me one bit. The positive side is that you can purchase all your running gear and refueling nutritional products here. All full marathon bibs and goodie bags have to be picked up on Thursday and Friday as there is no Saturday race day pickup. There are friendly staff members ready to direct you to the spot you want to go to. The goodie bag. Picking up the marathon bib and bag is really easy. You go downstairs and pick up the bib number. Bring your ID and your signed completion sheet that was sent to your final confirmation email a few days before the race. Once you check your bib number, pick up the bib and pins and pick up the clear marathon bag that already has your t-shirt in there. You can change your corral placement while there. The t-shirt was an official Brooks t-shirt which could be used in your regular training runs as it is moisture wicking. The bag has quite a number of fliers/pamphlets and a few tiny sachet samples. Once you are done with the bib and t-shirt pickup from downstairs, you then go up the steps and get to the expo proper. Getting to the marathon on Saturday morning *Make sure that, if possible, you have a running pouch/belt/armband that can accommodate your Metro card/Smartcard, hotel/car keys, credit/debit card, money and your ID. This is because, after the race, you'll need your ID to get your free/complimentary beer at the finish line. You'll also need a place to store your various cards to use when going to the start line (metro card) and so forth. - Public transportation. The DC metro is probably the quickest way to get to the start (it was 14th and Constitution avenue) 'Federal Triangle' stop on the DC Metro. Most people were catching the metro that Saturday morning. There may have been a change of schedule to have the metro trains run earlier than usual in response to the race. - catching a cab/uber/lyft or driving to the start line is very tricky. Make sure you start your journey way before time. Many streets close to the start and finish line are closed and security is on full alert at the start and finish lines. You may have to walk farther than usual if this is your preferred mode of transportation. Checkpoint, dressing, clear bag and corral - Security in DC is quite beefed up on this day. The police are everywhere, a reassuring thought especially after the Boston marathon terrorist attack. By 6.00 am when I got there, the security points were already opened and the security staff were only allowing the clear bags and checking them. Once past the checking point, you will have to walk a bit far, more than a block away/half mile to the UPS trucks where the bags are stored. Some bananas were on the way for those who may like to load up on their carbs and potassium. Once you get to the UPS trucks, your last name initial will determine which truck your bag will be placed in by the UPS staff. You just need to tear off one of the tags from the bib to the goodie bag for identification/location purposes. There was a row of porta Johns close to the start point but as in all major races with a multitude of people, there will be long lines, so come early if you are the kind of people who use porta Johns a lot or need to use it before the race. Please bring/carry your own tissue paper just in case. - Dress up warmly for the time before the marathon. It was about 40-50 degrees in 2016. Use old clothing, an old hoodie/sweatshirt and pants that you can discard on the roadside while running. They donate discarded clothing to charity. On the course, I saw expensive brand name 'new' or slightly used clothing discarded and I felt bad for the people who had discarded the newish clothes. I think the generally agreed upon 'Dress up for the race and add 10-20 degrees' applies here. The temperatures in 2016 never went above 50, which made for perfect running weather! - Corrals. During registration, the runner chooses a corral based on their estimated finish time. (You can change your corral at the expo. This enables there to be spacing as it is a huge event with an estimated 20,000 plus runners. If you are trying to chase a time or don't want to be held behind by slower runners, you can be at the very front of your coral. As you run the race, you'll realize that being at the front of the coral might not really matter as I'll explain in a moment... The start up to the 13.1... The race started on time and the announcements were clear and concise. Due to the large amount of runners, depending on what coral you are placed, you might not start racing for several minutes as they space up the runners. They don't enforce the no earphones/headphones rule. I don't think that it is an issue anymore, used to be an issue in some races a few years ago... The start of the race from the National Museum of American History takes you towards the Washington Monument onto Rawlings park. On Mile 2, you are past the Reflecting pool and you can see the Lincoln memorial. You then cross the Potomac River on the Arlington Memorial Bridge as you get to mile 3 for an out and back. Mile 4 finds you on the Watergate complex past the JFK Center for performing arts. Once you approach mile 5, there is a steep hill on Rock Creek Parkway that will sap quite a bit of your energy and slow you down. From mile 6 to 8, you start approaching the DC neighborhoods and on mile 8 you are in Columbia Heights. The crowds get larger here and they provide the emotional boost, much needed after the mile 5 hill. Mile 8 and 9 takes you past Pleasant Plains and Mile 10 brings you back to downtown DC, with the Capitol Building in front of your view way ahead. It's a long straight stretch where you can gauge your running and determine if your pace is working well. Mile 11 brings you close to the Washington Union station and then you head off to Lincoln park for mile 12. The 13.1 to the 22 mile Mile 13 takes you towards the State Capitol building. Mile 14 finds you close to Folger park. The scenic route is over for now and you enter the more gritty roads of the marathon with fewer crowds. Mile 15 brings you to the Nationals Park before taking you to another out and back for mile 16 and 17. This place has some industrial look to it and you do meet runners who are ahead of you and runners who are behind you. Both a source of heartache and solace. After mile 17, you cross the Anacostia River to go to the Anacostia park after mile 18. Get ready for the toughest part of the marathon, a dream killer, where your PR and BQ dreams come to die! The hills are so steep many runners simply choose to walk up the hills! Once you are done running (or walking) up the hills, you then come to another in and out at mile 20, close to the river into the park. I don't get why they make these hills part of the marathon route. Maybe they want to give the marathon a 'tough' image, being that the marathon was formerly the National marathon and was associated with the military. You will find quite a number of military banners and a lot of support for the military by spectators. Mile 22 to Mile 26.2 Mile 22 to the finish line is an absolute test of strength, both physical and psychological, after the punishing hills. Mile 23 cuts through the Fort Dupont park and as you approach mile 24, you approach the Greenway neighborhood. A straight stretch takes you to mile 25 where you run a circle and now approach the Anacostia River towards the finish line. The crowds are larger here after running through the various parks and once past the river, the Robert Kennedy Stadium (DC United soccer stadium) is in sight at mile 26. The finish is close to the DC armory, a familiar sight, where the expo was held the day/s before the marathon. Treats After The Marathon... Once past the finish line, there is an official photographer who takes a post run picture of you. A volunteer hands you a finisher medal. Ask one of them to take a picture of you if you have been running with your smartphone and you do not have anyone close to the finish line, just like I did. As you keep walking from the finish line, you are offered bottled water, Gatorade and chocolate milk for rehydration. There are bananas and pretzels too. It's then time to collect your marathon clear bag from the UPS trucks. They place the bags under your last name and bib number so the bags are easy to retrieve. - once you pick up your goodie bag, you then go back to the main tent to pick up your marathon finisher jacket. You are allowed to wear a sample one before picking your jacket but for some reason, they don't allow you to exchange the jacket once you have picked it up. You have to tear off a tab from your bib to get the jacket. - There is also a place where they give you a free alcoholic beer. You need ID and be over 21 to enter the enclosed place. They are very strict about the ID. No ID no entry! - There is a lot of entertainment at the finish line with featured bands playing live music. - Leaving for home/hotel is easy. Since you were at the expo the day or two before, you shall use the same station to go back to your respective hotel. Use the smartcard if possible. The metro is crowded but you'll be in the company of other runners so there will not be any awkwardness. There are regular trains so the wait is not as bad. The Race Photos The race photos were processed by marathonphoto. The race photos were ready after about 3-4 days which was very impressive. The photos are pricey and budget wise are not for the faint hearted but the memories are well worth it. The photos capture you at various stages of the race and at the finish line.
4.0

By: David F.

Posted: March 18, 2016

Great time at RnR DC

I hadn't run the RnR DC race since 2012. This was pretty well run. I got to the start pretty early in the morning and there was still some setup to do but plenty of porta-pots to do your business. Half marathoners and marathoners start at the same time, so marathoners have to watch their pace a little bit. Cons: Not a lot of signage on where gear check was or where to go when leaving the Metro. Gear check drop off was a couple of blocks away from the start and a good distance away from jacket pickup after gear pickup. Not too many signs to direct you. Strange part of the course took you into and industrial park, just not a lot of scenery from 16-18. Pros: Great course, some nasty hills at mile 6-7 and from miles 21-24, but it was it was. Well stocked fluid stations. Good support from spectators. Great looking jacket for marathon finishers. Nice looking medal Decent food and drinks at the end. I missed the headliner band. I signed up to run the marathon next year as well. Train for some hills.
4.0

By: Alex S.

Posted: March 15, 2016

Great course, well organized, fun!

Great course, well-organized, and fun event. Excellent volunteers! First time running DC so coming from out of town was a treat. Marathon had everything we needed. Complaints about the hill at mile 6 are silly. Hill is not that bad at all but it is the toughest part of the first half. Go a little further and the hills at miles 21 through 26 are a bit worse (make you work a little more). Overall a very good mix of flat/hill so no complaints here. I'm not a follower of the rock and roll series of marathons and was simply looking for something different. This run fit perfectly. Well done! Would definitely do it again!
4.0

By: Roger H.

Posted: May 12, 2015

Good Marathon To Run

I enjoyed this marathon despite the unfortunate timing of mother nature to greet us with a cold, rainy, somewhat windy day. Despite the weather, most of us bundled up and enjoyed the race. The race was well organized. We received very informative emails prior to the race. The packet pickup on Thursday went very smoothly. The expo was fairly large with a good variety of running items being offered. The race started on time and the release of each wave was timely. There were plenty of water stations and the volunteers did a great job of serving us. They provided a very nice t-shirt for participating, but the real bonus was receiving a terrific jacket for finishing the marathon. The medal was pretty decent also. We did a lot of walking prior to and after the race which is what I would expect for a race that had around 18,000 participants. We had to hike a few blocks to get to the drop bag trucks. After the race, we walked a few more blocks to retrieve the bags, and then another quarter to a half mile to get to the Metro. As for the Metro, be smart and purchase your Metro card the day before otherwise you'll be waiting in a huge line after the race to buy a card so you can get on the Metro. The food after the race was good enough, especially the chocolate milk. The course is fairly scenic with several good glimpses of the nation's Capitol. As others have written, it's a rolling hills type of course with a long uphill climb in the Rock Creek area and a steep hill around mile 23 or 24 that many walked. In summary, I would recommend this race as the course was good with Capitol views and other scenic views such as the Rock Creek area, the volunteers were great, t-shirt, jacket, and medal were definitely keepers, and you get to run at our nation's capital.
4.0

By: Christopher Loza

Posted: March 17, 2015

Used to be good marathon before Rock n Rollization

I last ran the National Marathon in 2010. Then it was a positive experience. The start was by the armory, and you could stay indoors until real close to the start. The RnR organization came in, moved the start so they could charge an extra $90 for pre-race and post-race shelter. The course now has a LOT more turns than it had then, adding significantly to the effective distance run over the course of the marathon. Also the pace group leaders did not seem to account for this. Also, RnR cut back drastically on the number of pace groups provided. I was hoping for a 3:15 pace group, but the only options for me were 3:10 and 3:30. The 3:10 pace group had three pace leaders - why not have just one as the National did and spread the volunteers over other increments. I had to let the pace group go after 22 miles, but after analyzing my results afterwards, I'm sure there were a lot of disappointed folks who stuck with them hoping to qualify for Boston. When I let them go at mile 22, they were at perfect 7:15 pace. Unfortunately, this was according to my GPS watch. The effective distance I ran was 26.6 miles. All that weaving and wide turns add up. They apparently didn't account for this unless they expected everyone to drop to 6:30 pace for the last 4+ miles. The race itself was well organized. RnR definitely turned this into a much bigger race than in the past. For me, that's actually a negative. The first half was ridiculously crowded until the 1/2 marathoners broke off. If I run this marathon again, it will only be because I'm local. I would definitely not travel for this event. If I don't get into Marine Corps in the fall, my alternate will definitely not be a RnR event.
3.0

By: Samantha W.

Posted: March 17, 2015

RUN away from this marathon

This was my 5th marathon and worst run. Pittsburgh, Boston and USMC were exceptionally well run. The Rock and Roll marathon was a disaster. Their race director should not have that job. They changed the course a month out to add a massive hill at mile 22. The course itself was .3 miles longer than 26.2. Bag drop and pick-up were incredibly far out of the way and poorly organized. The finish area was disaster. Bananas were hard and green, gatorade needed scissors to open (none on hand) and then you needed to walk almost a mile to metro up narrow steps and around the armory & for which you then waited over 35 minutes to even get into the metro station. Total cluster. The roads were blocked off so ubers and taxi were not an option home. Also no post race communication.
2.0

By: Samantha W.

Posted: March 17, 2015

RUN away from this marathon

This was my 5th marathon and worst run. Pittsburgh, Boston and USMC were exceptionally well run. The Rock and Roll marathon was a disaster. Their race director should not have that job. They changed the course a month out to add a massive hill at mile 22. The course itself was .3 miles longer than 26.2. Bag drop and pick-up were incredibly far out of the way and poorly organized. The finish area was disaster. Bananas were hard and green, gatorade needed scissors to open (none on hand) and then you needed to walk almost a mile to metro up narrow steps and around the armory& for which you then waited over 35 minutes to even get into the metro station. Total cluster. The roads were blocked off so users and taxi were not an option home. Also no post race communication.
2.0

By: Roger H.

Posted: March 16, 2015

Good Marathon To Run

I enjoyed this marathon despite the unfortunate timing of mother nature to greet us with a cold, rainy, and somewhat windy day. Despite the weather, most of us bundled up and enjoyed the race. The race was well organized. We received very informative emails prior to the race. The packet pickup on Thursday went very smoothly. The expo was fairly large with a good variety of running items being offered. The race started on time and the release of each wave was timely. There were plenty of water stations and the volunteers did a great job of serving us. They provided a very nice t-shirt for participating, but the real bonus was receiving a terrific jacket for finishing the marathon. The medal was pretty decent also. We did a lot of walking prior to and after the race which is what I would expect for a race that had around 18,000 participants. We had to hike a few blocks to get to the drop bag trucks. After the race, we walked a few more blocks to retrieve the bags, and then another quarter to a half mile to get to the Metro. As for the Metro, be smart and purchase your Metro card the day before otherwise you'll be waiting in a huge line after the race to buy a card so you can get on the Metro. The food after the race was good enough, especially the chocolate milk. The course is fairly scenic with several good glimpses of the nation's Capitol. As others have written, it's a rolling hills type of course with a long uphill climb in the Rock Creek area and a steep hill around mile 23 or 24 that many walked. In summary, I would recommend this race as the course was good with Capitol views and other scenic views such as the Rock Creek area, the volunteers were great, t-shirt, jacket, and medal were definitely keepers, and you get to run at our nation's capital.
4.0

By: Jack M.

Posted: March 16, 2015

Worst Marathon Ever

After running nearly 60 marathons, this event was borderline negligent in their failure to plan for 40 degree temperatures in the forecast with wind and rain. The start, course, expo and particularly the ending were near chaos. Ending the race with soaked runners with no warming tents, transportation (they closed the metro) left runners stranded in a driving ice rain facing hypothermia. The medicine tents were over flowing in what looked like a mass casualty event. Bag drop off and pick up forced exhausted and expended runners to criss cross acres of open 1970s era parking lots to find their non sequenced bags and then a HIKE to try to get in line with thousands to the metro station&no guidance or markings & medical tents had insufficient staff and IVs to handle runners in distress. Never again, this race.
1.0

By: Mark J.

Posted: March 16, 2015

I had a great race, but there were HUGE ISSUES

Living in DC and having missed the boat for the MCM, I was really excited to be able to run a local race through the city, and the course didn't disappoint me for that. Even though it was POURING rain, I had a great race and was very happy with how I did. That, however, doesn't change my analysis of the race and the major issues that I experienced, and my recommendation sadly is to steer clear of this race generally. PROS: -Great course, relatively flat, only one hard hill by mile 6, but it's also where the greatest concentration of spectators is so it was actually a very motivating part of the course. -There were stations handing out GU (see CONS for more info) -Marathon finishers got a free Brooks running jacket -Gear check had lines, but they used a bunch of UPS trucks so the lines weren't as bad as previous years and retrieving gear took no time. CONS: -One entire GU station was missing - they promised 3 but only 2 were actually there -A bunch of mileage signs were missing, including the 35K sign. -Gear check closed at 7:20 with no exceptions, so over half the racers had to stand in the rain for 30m to an hour waiting to start. -Water stations were an absolute cluster****. Not enough staff, too many runners, and only half of the water stops had Gatorade. I actually missed two of them because of the crowds, and ultimately had to resort to yelling and pointing to actually procure fluids. -The first half of the course is shared with half-marathoners, and it's AMATEUR HOUR, so experienced runners or runners who are easily irritated by this should steer away. -EXPENSIVE. There's a 20 dollar fee to register that isn't part of the $150 registration fee. -Literally no spectators on the second half of the course. NONE. Which is fine if you're prepared for it, but you could definitely tell there was a loss in energy for most runners -Apparently there were bands, but I could only hear them for MAYBE 1 minute of my run total. -The finish line concert ended within an hour of me finishing the race, so if you do the full then you basically miss out on all the stuff they try and sell you on. -Medical stations want half of your medical history before they'll give you 200mg of ibuprofen. REALLY? Give me the pills and let me run. -Cannot emphasize enough: WATER STATIONS ARE AN UNDERSTAFFED MESS. ADVICE if you decide to do it: -BRING YOUR OWN HYDRATION AND NUTRITION -Bring a GOOD playlist to get you through the second half where there are suddenly no runners or spectators -Be mentally prepared for the sudden disappearance of 90% of runners at mile 12 - it can cause a huge drop in energy -GPS gets messed up because of the tunnels -Rolling hills from 21-24 surprise a lot of runners -Be OK with the number of first-time racers - this can drive some people up a wall I had a great time, but I definitely don't plan to do another RNR event. There was just way too much amateurism from the organizers for a race that was so expensive and has been going on for so long. That said, for longtime DC runners, if you get a cheap bib (they can go as low as $50) and haven't done it, it's a cool course at the very least, but not one that I'm planning on doing again.
2.0

By: Britt R.

Posted: March 31, 2014

RNR top priority is $$

Ran this race in 2011 when it was the National Marathon and loved it. This is an expensive race to begin with, and RNR made it clear that milking every dime possible from me was top priority (e.g. charging for runner tracking, $25 to use some of the porter potties, $25 to park near finish, $20 per packet to pick up for friends/family!, etc). This will be my last RNR in general. Pros: Nice volunteers, wave start well organized. Nice shirt. Cons: Aforementioned constant solicitation of $$. Bands were far and few between and some not playing. Gatorade only every other stop. Course was much more runner friendly and scenic in 2011 (be prepared to run on rolling hills almost the entire time.) Start used to be at RFK, which provided shelter in the morning. Weather worked out well this year, but that won't always be the case. There is absolutely no where to take cover now.
2.0

By: Mike J.

Posted: March 21, 2014

Still RNR but better than 2013

Yes this is an RNR race and some people will hate that. But as someone who relies heavily on these reviews its important to give credit where credit is due. I ran 2013 and had to drop to the half. The race was pretty much as described. 2014 they took the feedback from 2013 and used is as an advertisement. After saying I'd never run it again I signed up and decided to give it another go. Pros: Far more volunteers this year Not that bad of a course. Some rolling hills, one big hill, and a lot of rewarding downhills. More space in the expo As much as I complain about RNR my PRs always come at their races because their corral start spaces runners out better than any other races I've run. Temps were 50s-60s F and clouds stayed out for a good percentage of the race which always helps. 2013's full sunshine made the water situation worse. Cons: Still gatorade only every other stop. And if the sun actually came out I'm sure they would have run out again. Annoying that it ends at RFK stadium instead of downtown which means a long metro ride back for most but at least its mass transit accessible. Expensive if you don't register early or with a coupon DC is a great city, mid-March is a great time of year to get a marathon in. Having the pleasure to meet some international visitors during the race I realize the importance of these reviews. This race is not perfect, but DC is very accessible, the hotels were not very expensive race weekend and the people were great. I'm glad I gave it a second chance.
4.0

By: Tom M.

Posted: March 21, 2014

This is not a good race

There are too many people for too few aid stations. People backed up at the aid stations and you had to serve yourself. This is a poorly organized race.
2.0

By: Michael A.

Posted: March 18, 2014

Worst. Marathon. Ever. (or close to worst!)

First - volunteers, thank you!!! Organizers - amateur hour. Packet pick up was disorganized. The volunteers were very friendly, but, very uninformed. Go down to the basement for bibs, go back up stairs for bags and shirts. Good luck finding the exits. Pre-start/Start- yes there were corrals, but, anyone could go into any corral. Not a huge deal to me, but, then, why have the wave start? 25,000 runners... only 13 water stations, 6 Gatorade stations. Seriously? And the stations were not very well manned. By the second half of the race, you had to get your own water at some of the stations. Poor volunteers. Good luck getting them to come back. Post race - very little food or drink. No directions to metro. At 5 hours, they seemed to be closing up shop. If this was an independent race, I would give the organizers a lot more slack, but, as a Rock'n'Roll, you should have 5-10 more water stations, 15 more Gatorade stations and a lot more aid station support.
2.0

By: Jayna A.

Posted: March 15, 2014

Your race is what you make it

This is a big race in a big city so you need to deal with it. Plan ahead for traffic and porta potty lines. Overall good. Nice course. Pretty. One hill that isn't bad. Wave start was good. Plenty of runners on course. Not too bad. Wish there had been more bands. Overall it was fun.
4.0

By: Ken S.

Posted: May 17, 2013

what a strictly-for-profit marathon looks like

I ran this twice when it was the 'National Marathon' and now twice since it has become part of the Rock-and-Roll Marathon business. This year was probably my last, and I don't expect to run any other R&R events. Although the organization under National Marathon had its flaws, it had a much better feel to it. For the entry fees the R&R corporation charges they really should be more runner-focused, but it's clear that their bottom line is the financial bottom line. PROS: - ok, I'll hand it to them for getting Metro to open at 5:00am. That does cost extra money ($30k per hour), and it made getting to the start by metro much more feasible for a lot of participants. - wave start was well done - the new route for the first half was nice, but they got lucky this time (see the Cons section below) - the 7:30am start is better than the 2012 start at 8:00am, but not as good as the 7:00am start that just about coincides with sunrise CONS: - sports drink only at every other station (ie, every 4 miles)?! I've never seen a race so stingy with sports drink, except for the 2012 edition of this race. - changing the start line meant not having the Armory to warm up in as they have in the past. If they had gotten the 40-degree rain that was predicted there would have been a lot of cold, wet, unhappy runners. And some year that will happen. - it's all about max'ing the number of runners, especially half-marathoners, without providing the facilities to support that many runners - the placement and ordering of the bag drop-off relative to the starting corrals was crazy and very inefficient. The bag pickup was worse, with volunteers basically telling runners to climb in the school bus and find their own bags amidst the unordered pile. A couple final comments. I can't believe the person who posted that miles 10 & 11 were 'scary' and that it's good there was a police presence. Yes, there are homeless people in DC, and some of them live under the same underpasses that we ran through. But scary? Or the person who complained that the Armory (site of expo) was in a bad part of town. Please, go back to the 'burbs. Second, I'm ambivalent about the second half of the course. I'm glad the course goes east of the Anacostia, but the combination of fewer runners doing the full and routing them through parkland much of the way makes for kind of a lonely run. I'd love to see what happen if they reversed the course direction some year!
3.0

By: Brent G.

Posted: April 16, 2013

First and last rock and roll marathon

The DC rock and roll marathon was the most expensive race i've run. It was also the most disappointing. There were huge lines for the pre-race port-o-potties, the back half of the course had few fans, and i waited about 45 minutes to get my bag at the end of it. The race was clearly geared for the half-marathoners and the for-profit nature of the race is sickening. The bands along the course were terrible and especially sporadic the final ten miles. The pittsburgh marathon does a much better job of having music along the course. The post-race concert started long before the majority of the full marathoners were done. Hopefully the district will pull the permits on this joke of a race. Don't waste your money.
2.0

By: kornheiser m.

Posted: March 25, 2013

So-So Marathon

Running prior Rock & Roll events I was looking forward to this marathon. The race did not impress me or disappoint me. I expected the majority of the runners are for the half. This made the first half much more enjoyable to run but very difficult to get water/gatorade. The stations in the first half were a mess. This was aleviate in the second half due to less runners but without proper hydration early and when taking GU's hit hinders your performance in the later stages of the race. As for other problems that others have mentioned, I did not see many of them. Being from out of town and staying at a hotel (Hyatt) clase to the start. I was albe to wake up later than most and walk up to the start with no problems. No need for bagagge, port a johns, or warmup. Actually got there too early at 7:15, did not start my corral until 8:00. The course was fine, the first half went through the tourist areas and some college parts (the hill at mile 6 was a killer), the second half went along some of the waterfront (little breezy) and by the Nationals stadium, the last few miles were residuantial then back to RFK. Psot race was fine, plenty of food , chocolate milk was gone for us slower runners(4:45) but plenty of the rest. Note always good to carry the goody bag they give you, fold it up and put in your pocket if you can. this enables you to take as much food as you can carry, leave the area and find a spot to sit and eat and recover. The post race beer was a nice touch even though the weather was chilly. Did not use the bagage so I cannot comment on the delays others had. Getting back to my hotel was easy, found a cab. Overall needs some improvement, but since it gears to the half more than the full it is understandable. Maybe run the full 1 hour before the half and have a seperate food and recovery area.
3.0

By: Chris C.

Posted: March 22, 2013

overcrowded / understaffed

Volunteers/support staff: (The good) These people were extremely helpful, motivated, and genuinely tried their best to satisfy all requirements in a professional manner. (The bad) They were absolutely overwhelmed by the amount of people on race day. Water/Gatorade stations for example; I did not get my first cup of Gatorade until after the marathon separation point near mile 13, it simply wasnt available when I approached a table at any of the previous stations. Runners were actually waiting in line for cups. At some water points I had to pick up an empty cup and hand it to a volunteer who then filled it up from a hose that was dribbling water. This was the first marathon where I had to actually stop and wait while someone filled up a cup. Information/directive signs: (The good) Mile marker signs were visible and there was no confusion at the marathon/half marathon split. (The bad) Unlike other marathons I have run, I did not see any signs informing me that a water station was near. There were so many people running this race it was hard to see ahead. On more than one occasion, it seemed as if I was halfway through a water station before I even realized it was there. Port-a-johns: (The good) There were port-a-johns. (The bad) Not nearly enough. Ive never stood in a line that long before a marathon, not even close. Baggage check: (The good) There was enough space for everyone to check in a bag. (The bad) much like the port-a-johns, the lines were extremely long and slow moving. Check-in points were lined up in alphabetical order (first 3 letters of last name); I think the whole gear check process would have been less confusing if check-in stations were arranged in numerical order of the bib, just like packet pick-up at the expo. The course: (The good) First 16 miles. (The bad) last 10.2. Not sure if planners care to do much about this since this event is definitely catered to the half-marathon runner; less than 1/4 of all participants actually signed up for the marathon. Race tracking service: (The good) It was offered. (The bad) It was not free. Marine Corps Marathon, which is by far a better marathon experience in every single aspect, does not charge extra for this service. There is a reason why MCM sells out 30,000 tickets in less than 3 hours and R&R has tickets available a few days prior to their marathon. Transportation: (The good) Metro stations opened early enough and were in close proximity of both the start line and finish line. (The bad) No complaints
3.0

By: Tanya A.

Posted: March 22, 2013

I could have been better

Pros: Its DC - scenic T-Shirt Expo Cons: Some people behind me didn't run the whole course. Course was too crowded No Chocolate milk by the time I finished After the course split it was very dry Water points under staffed or something, very poorly organized No Chocolate milk by the time I finished No Chocolate milk by the time I finished No Chocolate milk by the time I finished No Chocolate milk by the time I finished Yeah I meant to say it all those times!
3.0

By: Ma E.

Posted: March 22, 2013

This is a business...Not a runners Race

RnR series has become way too crowed. Too many people to really enjoy the course. I was lucky to have a decent bag check in my but the lines for other check ins were ridiculously long. Not to mention the line for pick up. Waiting 20-30 minutes after racing 13.2/26.2 is totally unacceptable. There should have been Gatorade at every water stop instead of every other stop. I got a cramp in between stations and went to a medical tent. I asked for salt packets and they looked at me like I was stupid. It took me 40 mins to cross the start line and I wasn't happy. I believe that this series has become more interested in turning a profit and packing as many people as they can into a race. I left the race feeling as though the RnR serious is less concerned about the runners' experience and more concerned about $$$. I have participated in several RnR events but this will definitely be my last! Oh, the course was probably one if my least favorites. I don't think it's professional to cut a course in a way where the runners have to hop over a curbed median at an angle. I forgot what mile it was but it was before mile 6. I hope the race director really gives my comments some consideration. I will definitely discourage others from running this race. On a positive note, the bands were fun and the volunteers were great!
2.0

By: Karl L.

Posted: March 21, 2013

A fun race with some issues

I am no grizzled vet, so I cannot tell you how other big races are. So let me give you my impressions: Big port o let lines. Nice wave start. Good, mostly downhill course (anyone who complains about the hill at 6 must never have trained on a hill). Some water stations inexplicably unmanned. Good fans. Great clear running after the halfers went away. A wonderful run. I didn't check a bag and I didn't drive, so I cannot address those issues. But from a running standpoint, I had a great time.
4.0

By: John H.

Posted: March 20, 2013

Very disorganized

I ran the half marathon and enjoyed the course. I had to pick up my own water since the aid stations fell behind. The organizers need to provide more incentive to volunteers to get enough to man the volume of runners. It appeared to me that the race organizers were not prepared to handle the number of runners. They need to employ some runners to tell them how to conduct a race with big numbers.
2.0

By: jerry k.

Posted: March 20, 2013

R&R Organization laughs all the way to the bank

This for-profit organization laughs all the way to the bank. They charge top dollar and then rely on volunteers to make the race work. The lines at bag check took forever. I just made the start and there were thousands still on line to check their bag. Picking up my bag was worse! I was fifth in line and still waited over 40 minutes to pick up my bag. Volunteers were inside the bus ignoring us as they seemed to just begin organizing hundreds of bags. The course is fine but if you are a runner who likes Rock n' Roll bands, just remember, they're volunteers too. They might show up; they might not. They may be playing or not. And they may have no talent. Once again, the for-profit owners don't really care. They're counting their dough and laughing while volunteers carry out the race. This 'Competitor Group' seems to be intent on buying up every race in the world too. What a shame. Especially when the take over excellent races with long histories like the Philadelphia Distance Run where they tripled the price. They smell profit!
2.0

By: Tricia Z.

Posted: March 20, 2013

Run the HALF- NOT the FULL

Horribly organized race. All was well until mile 12.2 when the race split. 20,000 did half, 3,500 did full. The second half of the course was bare- w/ few runners, little support, and horrible water stations. I hit the wall at mile 24 and walked the last two. If I passed out on the side of the road, no one would have been the wiser. Expo was good, but they charge for every little thing. Skip this.. RUN DISNEY (if you are a one and done marathoner)
3.0

By: Michael W.

Posted: March 19, 2013

It Actually Rocked...And Rolled

Wow, so much negativity...but whatever. This was an urban marathon, where parking was already going to be scarce and costly (although free parking for packet pickup at RFK was really cool). The expo was what I expected, a lot of variety and had to get some gear to prepare for rain (hat, arm sleeves, better socks). Thankfully, it didn't rain in the event, but those items did their job well. Also bought GU from their stand. Drove back to the hotel in Rockville, MD. The Subway opened up at 5AM race day, which is a nice touch for someone who is a bit further than most others. Got on around 545 and made it to DC around 630. Followed a group to the start and saw little lines at the porta potties at the corrals and took advantage even though I didn't need to go. It was neat seeing the Capitol and Washington Monument dark like that. I was in the 4th corral for about a 3:30 time, and we started 3 minutes into the event, they did a great job to control each corral and the road closures on the main roads. Not too familiar with DC, but the course did a great job to cater me what was to be seen. Best part was a 3-mile trek on the Rock Creek Parkway; very peaceful, relaxing, and mostly flat. The hill on mile 6 was a nice change and went into a rustic neighborhood. Only scary part were miles 10 & 11, but it was on a main road and loads of police helping out. Going though the 9th St. Tunnel and seeing Nationals Park were nice touches in the 2nd half. Weather turned out great for the event and can not complain! Free beer and nice medal at the finish...okay spread too. My only issue of the whole event was the baggage pick up afterwards. They did a good job using the buses and splitting the alphabet evenly, but there seemed to be logistical issues as it took me a half hour to get my bag. But that can improve. I guess the lack of people at some water stations too, but I can't complain since most cups were already filled so I don't need someone to give me a cup...as long as there's water or Gatorade, it's all good!!
4.0

By: Matthew L.

Posted: March 19, 2013

Not enough race personnel and volunteers

PROS: Parts of the course were very scenic, running down Constitution ave. past the Washington monument and the Ellipse, the bridge to Arlington with the national cemetery in the distance, going by the Supreme court and Capitol building. Past mile 13 the course was virtually deserted and eerily quiet, you would think that no one in the city knew there was a marathon going on, just a few startled tourists saying 'let's go runners' on the mall. For runners who like lots of crowd support this would be a con, but I found the Potomac and Anacostia river path sections pleasantly peaceful, with no car traffic around. The band playing 'Eye of the Tiger' at mile 9 was awesome. I swear the band at mile 20 was singing a song with lyrics about dying, but then again I could have been imagining it... Amazingly the finish line area still had lots of food and supplies when I finished the full marathon at 11:15 am, despite the 25,000 1/2 marathon finishers who got there before me. The split full/half chute at the finish definitely helped. CONS: There was an unusual amount of waiting in lines associated with this race. Long lines for security check and packet pickup at expo, gear check, metro, etc. Hard to decide what was worse - miles 23-25 of the marathon, or the standing for nearly an hour in the gear check line and at the metro entrance after finishing. I'm just glad it wasn't raining... Not enough volunteers & race personnel (probably not surprising - I find the idea of having volunteers working at a for-profit race unsettling). The aid stations were seriously understaffed for a race of this size. They changed the layout of the finish area from the map in the race packet, and there were virtually no race personnel around to give directions. My family got lost and took forever to find me. Inconvenient expo and finish line location (DC Armory). Although right next to a metro stop, it was very far from downtown and not in a safe area of D.C. Huge crowds at the start, I missed my corral wave start while waiting in the gear check line, as did several thousand other runners. It took me until mile 7 to actually start running my target pace, after trying to make way through elbow-to-elbow 1/2 marathoners. The elevation chart didn't prepare me at all for the rolling hills from miles 23-25 or the steep gradient at mile 6. An expanded vertical axis and a color coded gradient chart would have been helpful. The numerous tunnels did a number on my GPS watch distance readings. Better to invest in a foot pod sensor if you want to run this race using GPS pacing. I don't quite understand why they didn't have gatorade at every aid station, were they trying to save money? Fortunately I was using a gels+water strategy and it wasn't a hot day.
3.0

By: John H.

Posted: March 18, 2013

Pathetic

The Expo closed at 7:00 on both Thursday and Friday leaving most locals to scramble to get to the armory in time, after work. I waited in line at bag check for about 20 to 30 minutes in the cold after the race. The water stops and crowd support were TERRIBLE! There were about 5 to 10 workers at each water stop as thousands of runners easily overwhelmed them. The post-race layout was poorly configured. The reunion area was directly across from a large music stage causing cell phone conversation in the reunion area to be extremely difficult. I live in DC and I will not waste my money on this race in the future.
2.0

By: John M.

Posted: March 18, 2013

Deceptive and Disappointing. Pure money-grab.

Being a marathoner, a big fan of live music, and a DC native, I was elated to learn that RNR had taken over the National Marathon and would be bringing their unique approach to a race just miles from my front door. I'd heard mixed reviews about how RNR events tend to cater to the 'casual crowd,' but I'm not an elite runner, so I figured this would make for a fun event nonetheless. Regrettably, that's where the enthusiasm for this race ended. PROS: Great expo. Tons of vendors (because vendors = $$$) 'Rock' music (promised) at key spots along the course. Iconic scenery (from a distance, at least) CONS: - A point-to-point race meant no parking at the finish line unless you were willing to register in advance for the extremely limited VIP parking ($20). And even then, you still had to catch Metro to the starting line. The other option was (paid) parking at the start, and catching a Metro back from the finish line after the race. With 30,000 runners  this is a major concern. - EXTREMELY limited parking, due to the race being scheduled for the same weekend as DC's annual ShamrockFest (with the Marathon finish located in the exact same parking lot as the drunken carnival). - Inadequate number of restrooms before the race. I arrived early (5:45 for a 7:30 start) and hopped in line for port-a-john row at 6:30. FORTY SIX MINUTES later (7:16) and I reached the front of the line.* (full disclosure: I'm a guy, and only had to pee. But the race is in the heart of DC, so sneaking behind a bush isn't exactly the classiest - or most legal - of moves). *Here's another slick upcharge: race organizers set up a series of 'VIP' port-a-potties before the start of the race complete with A/C and running water for runners who wanted to 'potty like a rock star' (their words, not mine) - provided you'd spent $100 or more at the Expo the day prior. A hundred bucks to pee? No thanks. - Due to the point-to-point nature of the race, baggage check meant loading gear into school busses. Busses were parked in one long row, so lines were VERY long, to the point where several thousand runners were still checking bags and sprinting for the starting line 20 minutes AFTER the first corrals had begun the race. - Water stations were infrequent: roughly one every 2 to 2.5 miles. Gatorade was even less frequent - offered only at every other station (approx. every 4 miles). - Water stations were a disaster. At some stations, runners were actually grabbing our own empty cups from plastic sleeves (!!!) and lining up while volunteers filled drinks to the top. At other stations, volunteers were scooping water out of oversized jugs and filling the cups WITH THEIR BARE HANDS. While I appreciate the volunteers' efforts, gulping down hydration that tastes like watered-down cigarette smoke is just disgusting. - The course features lots of dogleg loops with no timing pads at the far end of each circle. As the race wore on, course organizers actually closed off portions of these loops and directed runners along the shortened course instead. I'm a solid middle-of-the-pack runner and managed to complete the full 26.2, but a number of runners behind me were not afforded the same opportunity. I can only speak for myself, but if I paid for a full marathon race and I was on pace to complete a full marathon in the required time, it's got to feel incredibly demoralizing to be redirected onto a modified course that is not even a full 26.2. - Bands along the course were obviously booked on a 'first come, first served' basis with no real thought given to genre or talent. High schoolers with a keyboard? A Capella choirs? A woodwind ensemble playing the Canadian National Anthem? Look - I'm not expecting Van Halen. But I was promised 'Rock and Roll' - so a smattering of good old fashioned bar bands don't seem like too much to ask. BOTTOM LINE: This is not a 'runner's race' for people interested in casual marathoning or general fitness. It's a 'corporate race' commandeered by a national promotion that is solely interested in maximizing profit. What a shame, because I absolutely wanted to love this event. Unfortunately, all I got was a poorly organized money-grab and a study in wasted potential. This will be my last 'Rock n' Roll' event.
2.0

By: Mark W.

Posted: March 18, 2013

Fundamentally flawed race

This race is run by a for-profit company, so they're not really motivated by service, just maximizing profit. Examples: -Charging for runner tracking (WTF?) -Huge parking fees -The worst would be not disclosing actual cutoff times. They diverted runners around the mile 22 marker onto the mile 23 mark. So many racers who were on-pace to hit the overall cutoff time (5:30) were not aware there was a cutoff at that mile marker. DISCLOSE ALL CUTOFF POINTS. This is crazy.
3.0

By: Chris C.

Posted: March 17, 2013

Rock 'n' Roll? More like Lullaby Marathon

30,000 runners this year... 26,500 of which were half marathoners and everything about this race seemed geared to that distance. The 1st half of the course is scenic and high energy. Great bands, nice surroundings, energetic crowd but after the half marathons split off to finish the marathoners are left in desolation. The course leads to neighborhoods and areas that are impossible for spectators to get to. The water stations become under staffed and the bands seemed like they were in a practice studio rather than a outdoor performance. Not to mention that there were two barely audible acapella groups. If I were rating the half marathon it would have been much higher. Unfortunately, the race became very unorganized after it was over. Many people, myself included, had to wait in lines for over an hour in gear pick-up. The race has potential but needs to make some major improvements, I can't say i recommend it.
2.0

By: Adrian D.

Posted: March 17, 2013

Super Early Spring Race

I really enjoyed this race. It is a very well run event, (almost) comparable to some of the better know big-city races. The course is very good, as runners pass by most of the DC landmarks (although there are stretches in the second half of the course that are in largely industrial zones, and a little spartan). Overall, I would highly recommend this race. The course is forgiving, the organization is very good, and what's not to like about spending a weekend in DC?
4.0

By: Disapointed Runner

Posted: March 17, 2013

Poorly Organized Event

Pros: -fan support was decent -nice tour of DC -medal was nice/shirt was niche Con: -Course had a totally unneccessary hill at mile 6. -getting my bag took over an hour and a half at the finish -too many people at the post race party (couldn't move or get the one beer they promised)
2.0

By: Scott C.

Posted: March 17, 2013

Quite Disappointed

This was my 5th marathon. Running Buffalo, Santa Barbara, Pittsburgh, and Miami I've experienced various terrains and climates. The R N R DC Marathon was by far the least pleasurable. The Pros: A beautiful starting point and seeing the White House and Monuments as the sun begins to rise. CONS: Too crowded, sparse crowd support sfter the half split, far too few volunteers, chaos at water stations and a pretty ugly course in what is a beautiful city. Biggest complaint: Hundreds did NOT run full marathon but think they did. At mile 21.5, a portion of course was closed off way too early to 'speed things up'. I am about a 4:45 guy and while I made the cut off, I saw folks jump right to mile 23 from 21.5. Inexcusable! So, my time for 26.2 is compared with others than only ran 24.7 This is a diservice to all. Also, for a R N R Marathon, one would think there would be actual MUSIC at various points. Most stands were empty or bad karaoke at best. Way too expensive and an ugly course. And while I did not use the bag check I heard from everyone that it was a complete cluster... I will not be back.
3.0

By: Brockett H.

Posted: March 17, 2013

potential for great race : poor organization

This race was fabulous but mired by not enough race staff / volunteers. - water stops were DIY (pour your own water from a faucet) - we more time spent in bag check lines than running on the course. - three clocks were not functioning on the course - I counted seven bands on the half marathon course If I had brought my own water and *not* checked a bag, it might have been a favorite race for the great scenery and spirit of a large race. However, I'd expect conveniences to be a cinch for such a large company. I'm also irked by the small needless fees: if someone else picks up your packet, for example. We took the 'corral' system seriously, but found that few in our corral did. The corrals were more determined by when people got out of the potty lines rather than paces.
3.0

By: Deborah L.

Posted: March 17, 2013

Terribly organized race

I ran the National Marathon its last year, missed the RnR last year but ran the half this year, in part to compare it to the old race. This was my first and I can say last Rock N Roll event. It was absolutely the worst organized race in which I've participated. There were too few volunteers and seemingly no professionals working it. There were NO signs for the aid stations, no warning signs so I could time my GU, and no signs at the stations themselves, suddenly you were just running by them. Half of the aid stations were out of water and some had no volunteers so we had to pour our own. Then there was the bag check. I waited 40 minutes to get my bag and I was lucky. Some people waited 1.5 hours. If it had been raining and cold as predicted we would have seen lots of hypothermia, its a safety issue at that point. Finally, there was no one directing people out of the gathering area so it was very difficult to find a way back to the parking lot. I hated this race.
1.0

By: Robert Y.

Posted: March 16, 2013

Good course, but penny pinching marred experience

Ran the half. Somewhat better beginning of course this year. But organizers cut corners in crucial areas and support was woefully inadequate for the crowd. VERY long wait for bag drop and much longer for pickup  the latter particularly a problem in cool temps; runners were shivering. Not enough Port-a-Johns at start led to very long lines. I barely made the start, and several friends missed it and had start way back and wade through thousands of slow runners. If they don't improve this, I would look elsewhere.
3.0

By: RNR W.

Posted: March 16, 2013

Where was the Rock N' Roll?

I also agree with a previous post: Course was much better before the RNR. The organization tries to minimize hassle for themselves, hence the boring course, especially in the latter half. (I didn't run the full but I live in SW and I can't believe where they put the course.) The Suntrust National Half used to run right through downtown and Dupont Circle. Also, the music was kind of lame. Okay, it was lame. Some of the groups were too quiet and weren't at all rock n' roll groups. Other groups were in between songs. Seriously, the best rock n' roll band I heard had a kid lead singer who looked he was 13 years old. The music was rough, but hey, at least it was loud. The DJ in Adams Morgan was good too. I thought the service on the run was fine, except running out of water around mile 11. So, if you want an easy course, this half will work for you. If you are interested in a more interesting course or an actual RNR half, don't do it.
3.0

By: Vernon S.

Posted: January 20, 2013

Fun race and can't wait to do again

Course was awesome!!! Lets you see some of the major tourist sights and gives a flavor of 'regular' DC with run through neighborhoods and along the Anacostia river on the back end. Crowds were great, supportive and loud. Although crowds did thin out on the last half of course, but how cool is it to run through some of DC's best and most despressed neighborhoods and have people high 5ing you all the way. I say good job RNR. I have done Marine Corps and this one and I think the RNR course is better. The course does have some small hills that all seem to hit at the worst time. Nice for variation, but be prepared. A wave start would be nice. The field is huge and it takes a while to thin out. I also agree could have used more Gatorade on the course and more ice or wet towels as the temperatures were well above normal. 70s in DC in March. Wow! Packet pickup was a breeze and using the Armory and starting/finishing at RFK stadium makes public transportation perfect. Would like to see Metro open even earlier. I was one of those in a train behind the train with the broken door, so I was late getting off. Can't blame RNR for a mechanical problem with a Metro car though. Despite heat, late start, etc, I had a PR. Fun day, fun course, great crowds, great taste of DC. Let's do it again!
5.0

By: Ken S.

Posted: December 12, 2012

it was better before it was RnR

I ran the half in 2010 and the full in 2011 when it was still the 'National Marathon.' Making this part of the RnR series has its pros and cons, but mostly minuses from my perspective. Pros: - unlike 2011, the course had 26 mile markers, and they appeared to be in all the right places Cons: - Gatorade only available at every other water stop, i.e., about every 4 miles. All other marathons I've run or seen have a sports drink at least every 2 miles. On a warm day like 3/17/12, I had to carry my own Gatorade. - the race is oversold. Way too crowded, especially the first half. - slow to provide info leading up to the race. Important things like when Metro would be open, where the hydration stops would be, etc only seemed to come out in trickles, and often not until closer to race date than normal. The organizers can't control the weather, but it was an unusually hot one in 2012. They could have adapted by adding ice, sponges, or whatever on race day, because it was forecast to be warm a week in advance. In 2012 Metro opened at 6am, which made it a viable option for most people to make the 8am start. But by 8am it is already getting warm, even on a normal March day. I wish that the race had started at 7am (as it did in 2011) and that Metro had opened at 5am (as it did NOT in 2011). What a lot of people don't realize is that the events have to pay $30,000 per hour for opening Metro early. Apparently hat makes too big a dent in RnR's profit margin for them to pay for a 5am opening (as I think the old National Marathon did in 2010), but that would be the ideal.
4.0

By: Armen T.

Posted: December 03, 2012

Ran the full, and will only run the half again

The Rock n Roll DC marathon was my second marathon and despite setting a PR, this was a tough slog of a course. It did not help it was unseasonably warm for DC that day, with the sun beating down on full marathoners in the middle and latter part of the race. The first half of the marathon (or the half-marathon itself) is greatlots of bands, great vibe, spectators, etc. But after the half-marathoners divert to the finish line, the second 13.1 miles became lonesome. The Anacostia portion of the race is brutal, especially the final climb up Minnesota Ave. I was passing people the final few miles who were a solid half-mile/mile ahead of me near the Nationals ballpark. If I do the 2013 race, I'm sticking to the half. From an organizational standpoint, I thought things were OK. Granted the unseasonable weather made me wish I had brought my own hydration unit, but the water stops came at the right time, otherwise I would have been in trouble. The only thing that was irksome (and not sure if it's RnR's fault) is the Metro needed to open up at 5 instead of 6. I was on the first Metro coming from Virginia (orange line) and it was standing room only when I got in and a sardine can by the time it hit the Stadium-Armory stop. That could have been planned better. Like I said, I'd run this race again but only the half marathon.
3.0

By: R. Bishop

Posted: June 12, 2012

No Man's Land for full marathoners - typical RnR

Rock N Roll stepped up the game a little compared to the disaster I read about for Las Vegas 2011. I tend to run RnR races with a lot of trepidation, but I wanted to get DC under my belt for a 50 state goal and the timing was right. Everything more or less went according to what I expected. The only real snag I found was the expo, theres really not a lot of guidance as to where you can park, but once you get settled it's pretty easy to get your packet. I liked the race shirt a lot, as I tend to wear a very small size and when they are unisex I still feel like I am wearing a tent in a small. The shirts are fitted for M/F and good quality. Plenty of vendors for grabbing last minute Gu or whatever you need. I have run a few other RnR events, and this was not much different. They really do cater to the half marathoners. Unless you run a 3-hour marathon you will miss the headliner band completely (luckily I don't run these races for the bands). The second half of the course was sparse, in full sun, fewer water stops, and pretty desolate and uneventful with fewer bands (honestly, this is typical of RnR, let's face it). The one saving grace was the tunnel you get to run through with the DJ blasting music, it was probably 15 degrees cooler and was such a nice treat. But the heat really put a damper on the overall vibe of the race, most of the runners looked fairly miserable by the final miles, and I finished probably 20 minutes slower than usual. It was just not my race this time around. I was finishing with 3 hour marathoners at 4:14. It didn't seem to be ANYONE'S race that day. The medals are OK, nothing special. I honestly always swear I will never run another RnR event, they are very commercial and clogged with way too many runners, but honestly this one was OK and if you can't get into Marine Corps Marathon, this would do for a DC race. Just don't expect a fantastic course the entire way, once it drops from the half it's a no-man's land.
4.0

By: Julie Q.

Posted: April 29, 2012

Excellent first marathon

D.C. is such a great city to run. Rock n Roll knows how to run a race. Fan support was great! Only lagged in the late miles in the park. Very well organized. Truly enjoyed the race. Looking forward to doing it again next year!
5.0

By: Sandy K.

Posted: April 16, 2012

Ok, but not great.

My first Rock n Roll race, and it was okay, but not great. Pro's Decent size expo Decent size (but not creative) finishers medal Chocolate milk at the finish line Easy access to public transportation for start/finish line Con Too many runners Not enough water stops, especially since the temps were much higher than anticipated No wave start Shirts lacked creativity (and same shirt for half and full marathon) Would have been nice to run by some of the monuments vs seeing them from 2-3 streets away. I have read thru the reviews on the Rock n Roll races and it appears if you are a serious runner, this is not the race/series for you. If you like lots of people, high fee's, beer at the finish line and a decent band/entertainment at the finish line, then this is the race for you. It appears the RnR races cater towards walkers and first timer's. BTW, at the expo, they offer a $15 discount to sign up for future RnR races.
3.0

By: Gretchen L.

Posted: April 08, 2012

Just OK.

I did this race purely because it is in DC and I had a 9 month old I couldn't leave for the weekend (other years I have run the Shamrock in VA Beach  one of my favorites.) The race was OK. Nothing compared to Marine Corps which I've done twice  that race is so well organized but hey it now sells out in two hours so I guess that says a lot. I didn't have any train issues but I live in Vienna (end of the orange line so I got on the very first train and never had to get off til I reached the starting line) - the car was completely full by the time we got two stops in and people were being turned away. The trains were only coming every 20 minutes and I heard plenty of people didn't get there in time for the start. I LOVED that they let you into the Armory to wait for the race to start. It was pretty chilly at 7 a.m. and I didn't want to gear check so all I had was my throwaway shirt... so nice to sit in a heated building until 7:35 or so. The premium was a nice Brooks running shirt, but I was annoyed that it said 'Marathon and Half Marathon.' There is a big difference between running 13.1 and running 26.2 and every time I wear it everyone asks if I did the half or the full. I was also annoyed that you had to pay for people to track you on their mobile phones (I emailed this to the race director and a couple of days later got an email that you could choose three people to track you for free... ) and that you had to pay $20 for a friend to pick up your packet. I picked up my own packet, and hey I have no problem with a rule that you have to pick up your own packet  triathlons make you show ID and have no exceptions  but charging $20 just shows that they are greedy, in my opinion. What extra work is it on their part? Either let people do it for free or don't let them do it at all. I didn't like being on the same course as the half (another lesson they could learn from Shamrock where the half starts 90 minutes before the full.) There were way too many people and it was hard to get past the big crowds. THEN somewhere around mile 7 someone told me I was running the wrong direction and I the full was supposed to go 'that way.' I was off course for close to two minutes. My neighbor ran it too and said the same thing happened to him and there was actually a sign that said the full people were supposed to go another direction (they weren't supposed to...) I'm not sure where the issue stemmed from but it definitely hurt my finish time. Of course the race would have to be on the hottest weekend in March (nothing the race directors could do about that.) I ended up with hyponatremia (my own fault  I was drinking three cups of water at every aid station) and was very disoriented for the last 7 miles and therefore I remember nothing about the finish, so I can't comment there. Getting home was easy  the train wasn't crowded and I just hopped on. Again very nice having the metro stop right there. As much as I love Marine Corps, both times I have had to wait over 40 minutes to get down the metro escalator. My GPS says I ran 26.85 miles. I can see I was off course for .2, but I'm surprised by the rest of it... every other race I've done has been spot on with the GPS. I'm not the only person who said they their GPS said they course was a bit long. I guess I should be REALLY proud though if I did my first sub 3:55 and ran almost 27 miles :) Will I run it again? Probably not. It's hilly and has the potential to be hot after training in cold temperatures all winter, and I'm not in love with the Rock N Roll organizers as they seem to be in it for the money. Who busses people to the finish line of a marathon? What is the point? Either make them DNF or extend the time limit.
3.0

By: Joe V.

Posted: March 24, 2012

First and last Rock and Roll Series

As for the actual course, nice lay out. Basically a figure 8 that, with a little prior planning and good use of the metro, allows anyone who is following you to meet up at several different points with relative ease. Some great views of the Capitol Building, White House, Washington Monument, etc. Weather was a little warm for my taste, but what can you do? As a previous post stated, there was obviously very poor organization in regards to the eventual 'time limit'. I am by no means a fast runner, but in my previous 2 marathons I always finished under the standard 6 hours, and my times have gone down each time. I was on pace to shave about 8 minutes off my previous best. Unfortunately, I did not finish the entire course because a loop that accounted for about a mile of the course was just closed at one point. Everyone behind a certain point was unable to complete the loop, and therefore did not actually finish a marathon. Furthermore, when we reached the point at which the loop was closed, we were not informed of the closure, we were just directed along the remainder of the course. Some of us realized this, and we were told 'no, that's closed now' when we asked if we could complete that portion. There was no mention at registration of the time limit being any less than 6 hours or for the potential for parts of the course being closed. The first time I saw mention of this fact was in an email on the 12th of March, just 5 days before the Marathon. This would have certainly played into my decision to partake in this event, because I am fully aware that my time is usually behind this pace. On the 14th, a clarifying email was sent out. This stated that the 5:30 clock started when the last runner crossed the starting line. It also stated that the cutoff point would be mile 12.1. Anyone behind the 5:30 pace at that point would be directed to finish the Half Marathon course. It made no mention of any other potential closure. It seems worth mentioning that I also do not believe I was behind the 5:30 pace of the last starter, because I could still see the 5:30 pace group (which I started behind) until just before this closure took place. Considering how few people actually seemed to be participating in the Full, I am also surprised that the 'after a point runners will be moved to the sidewalks' policy I've seen mentioned in other events was not put into place here. I understand it isn't always that simple, but my frustration makes me wonder. I understand that when you're not in top condition, as I'm not, you run the risk of not finishing in the allotted time. However, if you are not given ample warning about unusual time limits and potential arbitrary course closures, it prevents you from making an informed decision about whether or not to participate. The manner in which the course being shortened was handled was also deceptive and underhanded. My attempt to contact someone from RnR Series since the event has been ignored thus far So that's my rant. My first and last RnR Series Event. I can't justify the money spent on registration, travel, lodging and the like only to be misinformed about what exactly the event entails and deprived the opportunity to actually finish.
3.0

By: Heather M.

Posted: March 23, 2012

Should not have switched to a Rock n Roll series

I ran this race in 2011 and was extremely satisfied. I was hoping to run this race every year, but after the 2012 addition, I do not think I would run it again, or any other Rock n Roll series event. They encouraged everyone to take the metro, but there was not enough trams to fit all the spectators and participants. It was HORRENDOUS! I should have reached the start line at 7:20, however, after issues with the metro doors, we were kicked off our tram and I never reached the start line until 8:15; 15 minutes AFTER the race had started. If you are recommending people to take the metro, then there should be enough trams to accommodate all participants and spectators in order for them to reach the start line BEFORE the race actually starts. Also, there should be a limit on how many half marathoners can participate. I ran the full marathon and the first half of the course was atrocious!! Way too many people! Next time, they should try starting the half at a different time than the full. I felt those runners were not taking the event seriously, and after training for 4 months, I was very disgusted at the lack of room to run on those streets and perform my best. Also, when it is 80 degrees out, you need more water stations than every 2-2.5 miles. I was very dehydrated after the race, even after drinking 2-3 cups of water at each and every station. We were not used to the heat in March and more water should have been supplied. Finally, when I finished the marathon, all that was left in terms of food was chocolate milk, apples, fruit cups, and bagels. For the $110+ I paid for this race, a better selection of food and drinks should have been made available. It was a more worse event than last year. I would not recommend this event to other runners unless changes are made for 2013.
3.0

By: Nancy A.

Posted: March 22, 2012

Improved over the prior year

I ran the 1/2 marathon in 2011 and enjoyed the course so much I decided to run the full this year (my first full). The RnR folks fixed a lot of the logistical problems which had been present the prior year. Expo was good, start went smoothly, volunteers at the water stops were great. Weather in the 2nd half of the course was really tough (70 degrees, not a cloud in the sky and no shade) - quite a change from the mid-30s we had in 2011. Three complaints: 1) not enough porta potties for 25,000 runners on the course. 2) as a middle of the pack marathoner, Switchfoot was over long before I finished. The finish line festival is clearly geared to the 1/2 marathoners. 3) the medals were a big disappointment compared to the beautiful medals received in prior years. But overall a fun and well done race.
4.0

By: Lisa C.

Posted: March 22, 2012

RNR ruins another

I ran this also in 2009 when it was still the National Marathon. One again, RNR has oversold an event and neglected the basics. In a nutshell: 1) The metro was open an hour early and that was great for getting to the expo/start 2) The event was oversold. I was in the first few corrals, but it was still too crowded to move. This seems to be a theme with RNR 3) Not nearly enough aid stations. In all other races, there are aid stations every 1-1.5 miles. These ones were at odd intervals and not reliable. 4) The medal is lame. Perhaps it is an eagle? Not clear at all. Previous medals were more relevant. The one in 2009 had the Washington Monument I believe. This was just random, all about RNR and nothing about DC 5) $20 if my plane is late and my friend needs to get my packet for me? There's zero additional work for them, clearly just another opportunity for a money-grab 6) Apparently it's cool to cheat now. If you're unable to make the course limits, RNR will happily drive you closer to the finish AND give you a medal/time! Just...meh.
3.0

By: Sam g.

Posted: March 22, 2012

8am start turned out too late for Marathon

I did the full Marathon. This is my second time here. Last time (National Marathon), in 2010, the race started at 7am and this time it started at 8am. Shouldn't be a big deal as I did most of the long training runs around 8am. But, on race day, I felt like it was hot and humid from around 10am or so. So, the second half was not fun. Pros: 1. Expo 2. Race course Cons: 1. I think RnR oversold this race as I felt there were too many runners until 12th mile at which Marathoners split. 2. Race start of 8am turned out to be too late as it was a hot day. This race always used to start at 7am and I think RnR should stick with 7am start time 3. Very very bad planning of Metro. Metros started at 6am. Metros should have started around 5am or so and more frequently. All the Metros are jam packed and the Metro I rode was evacuated because of a problem with one of its door not closing.
4.0

By: Jim L.

Posted: March 20, 2012

Worst Race I have run

I am not sure where to begin. The fact that the race ended at 26.5 miles, there were hills in the entire course when portrayed as flat, or that there was no transportation available to get out of the event. I had to walk 2.5 miles after running 26.5 to get back to the hotel. Metro was blocked full, taxi cabs were blocked out, and the bus system was an hour behind. DC simply can not handle an event this size. This is truly a 1/2 marathon event. There is no scenery on the second half and running under urine smelling under passes is not my idea of fun.
2.0

By: Charli L.

Posted: March 19, 2012

Rock n Roll in DC

This was the first year that the race was managed by Competitor group and was billed as Rock n Roll USA. I ran the full marathon. I have previously run the National Half in '07, '08 and '09. The Good: Expo is at the armory, so metro accessible. Being a rock n roll race, the expo was much more impressive than in years past, but not as nice as other RnR expos I have visited. I think most of the better vendors were in VA beach for the Shamrock marathon. Great course support throughout the race, even after the half marathon split off. Plenty of water, gatorade, gu, and treats along the way. Nice tech shirt, we had a choice of blue or white. Great medal. I even like the course; much better than MCM, this shows you DC, the neighborhoods were very supportive adn out there giving high fives and encouraging us to keep going. The fantastic weather this year was a plus. Metro opened an hour early and the race started at 8 am, so that cut down on traffic congestion. Cons: This event was definitely geared more towards the half marathoners. The headliner concert was over well before most of the full runners finished. When I got to the finish area, a few of the booths were already packing up. The time limit for this one is much tougher than most RnR events, 5:30. There is talk that they started diverting runners or picking them up in the sag wagon earlier than they should have, not cool! I hope that they can work with the city to extend the time limit a bit for the full marathon and don't just eliminate it. DC is a very scenic city and it deserves a full marathon to call its own.
4.0

By: Jim cummings

Posted: March 19, 2012

Pretty Good for a marathon with a bad rep

The weather was a little warm for my liking, but everything else was near perfect. This was a well organized race. The course was hilly, but all of the hills were small by West Virginia standards.There was good music and great crowd support during most of the race. The water stops were well stocked and they had plenty of helpful volunteers (Thanks!) I would definitely recommend this race.
5.0

By: Alexis D.

Posted: March 19, 2012

RockNRoll did good job in first year

I've done this race twice. RNR almost doubled the size of the half, while growing the full about 10%. They should think about getting rid of the half relay. What they did right: It was a pretty hot day and many of the water stops had ice cups or put ice in the water/ade cups. They did only a minor tweak on what was already a good course and successful marathon. They got the Metro system to open early on Sat morning and this made it easier to use public transport to get to the starting line. RNR seems to have modified its bib pickup policy and you can now pick up for other people, but with strong restrictions. Finally, the expo center continues to remain open before and after the race and this helps when the early morning temperature is cold. What can be improved: RNR allowed runners to register for this race months before deciding it had a 5.5 hour limit. Not cool, even though they did keep the finish line open until 6:05. Water stops were about 2.2 miles apart. A little too long on a hot day. All water stops should have sports drinks instead of every other one. The baggage drop bag keeps getting smaller with each RNR marathon I do. I traveled as light as I could and could barely fit it into the official bag drop bag. Finally, RNR should stop calling their marathons inaugural in cases such as DC and Denver when they take over successful marathons and do minimum course changes. Runners should be aware that this course is relatively flat, but challenging. There are 5 moderate hills between miles 23 and 25. Most of the 'scenic' part of the course is in the first 15.4 miles.
4.0

By: Ken S.

Posted: December 05, 2011

it's a good course, but MILE MARKERS please

This was my first marathon, after running the half here in 2010. The time of year is good, and in 2011 the weather was perfect (IMO), with temps in the low to mid-40s, and slightly cloudy skies. And the 7am start was perfectly synchronized with sunrise. The course is good, especially the first half, which goes through more scenic parts of DC and has more crowd support. My biggest complaint in 2011 is mile markers. There were hardly any the first half, and a lot of them on the second half had to be in the wrong places. There's no way mile 17 took me 9:45, and I'm even more sure that I didn't do mile 19 in 5:50! The organizers acknowledged afterwards that they screwed up by not getting markers in place in time in the first half, but it's worrying that they seem unaware that mile markers were really a problem on the whole course. Metro opening only one hour before the start is too short to be useful to anyone. They should negotiate again with Metro, which they no doubt will, especially now that the National Marathon will be in the Rock-and-Roll series. After running into a nightmare traffic jam when I drove in 2010 I wised up this year and took a cab. It could only get me within 4-5 blocks, but that's fine. It is very nice to have the armory available for warming up, stretching, peeing, etc. It sure beats being outdoors in the dark. All in all a great experience, and one I hope to repeat.
4.0

By: Mike S.

Posted: April 20, 2011

Organizational disaster

This event could and should be great. Ran the half in 2010 decided to do full this year thinking the event would improve. It did not. Opening the Metro only one hour before start after advertising as transit friendly was a disaster. Facing a 45-minute Metro trip, I decided to drive as did many potential Metro riders. Due to gridlock, I missed the start by 12 minutes. Course was not marked with a mile marker until mile 10, and there were few after that. I was prepared for long hill in the first half, but the second half of the course was hillier than advertised with no crowd support. The finish line was crammed, with only one line for food and water, and empty tables on other side. Got my big toe crushed by an inattentive 300-pound volunteer in the finishing chute. So much for that nail.
3.0

By: Stephen Lee

Posted: April 07, 2011

Great spring race

I love coming down to DC to run this race. I've run the marathon twice, and this year did the half. It's a very scenic course, especially the first half. And running conditions always seem to be ideal - an early start and the time of year leave the air cool and crisp. It's true that the course is a bit hilly. On the other hand, there are several stretches of gentle downhill to make up time lost climbing. Besides, in my opinion a few hills give a course character. I mean, would anyone ever consider taking the Newton hills out of Boston? In any case, I always seem to run very good times in DC, usually much better than I'd expected. Not opening the Metro two hours early - as was done in past years - was a bit of a pain. I wonder if this had anything to do with Adrian Fenty not running the marathon - and with him not longer being the mayor, as well. In the end, though, it didn't affect me. Experience has taught me that I have to get to starting lines at least an hour early, in order to drop off my bag, stretch, and get in the last trips to the porta-potties; so I wasn't about to gamble on a train that at best would get me there half an hour before gun time. So I ended up taking the bus, as they seem to run pretty much all night, and even though it left me with a 10-minute walk from H St. to RFK (you can't transfer buses free), I still arrived in plenty of time. Hopefully the Metro situation will be better next year, maybe by getting Fenty back into public office. I found the expo to be fun. The kit pickup lines were a bit annoying (about 15 minutes), so hopefully that'll improve. But the kit bag had a couple of nice touches, including a pair of free running gloves - very useful for the first 30 minutes of the race. There were many more exhibitors than I remember from the previous years that I ran DC, and there was a speaker series, and many good deals to be had. And having the armory open to hang around in pre-race was terrific. I did the half, so the fair at the finish line was great at that point, with lots of good stuff to try. Plus I got to hang around and see the top athletes finish. Michael Wardian won again this year, and he's always been a bit of an idol of mine, so it was great to finally see him run. Plus a fellow Canuck came in second. Spectator support was strong, if not overwhelming, but to be honest, I don't find crowd support all that motivating at the best of time. It's nice, but it doesn't seem to do much for the weariness in my legs. Although I am kind of partial to the weird things that can momentarily take your mind off the pain, like the girls of Wellesley College with their "Kiss Me" signs; being able to hear the thunder of their applause from a mile away while running Boston; seeing the "Wall" they built around mile 20 the year I ran Sacramento, complete with a Grim Reaper stalking the runners; seeing the costumes that the water-station runners wear at Niagara Falls; hearing the phenomenal bands that line the first 10 miles in New York; or seeing the chubby belly dancers at mile 14 here in Ottawa. One year DC had a high school marching band performing outside their school, which was pretty cool, but since then there's been nothing I can think of, which is too bad. I guess the closest thing to a trademark is the finish line announcer who makes me laugh out loud with his over-exuberance. In previous years he called Mayor Fenty the fastest marathon mayor in the world; this year he called a councilman who did the half in just over two hours the world's fastest councilman. He may be right about Fenty, as the last time I ran the marathon I think he finished in around 3:25; but you have to think that there's a councilman somewhere who has gone under 2 hours for the half. But still, he is fun, as is the entire finish line festival, in my opinion. Yes, getting from the finish area to the armory to pick up my stuff was a bit of a pain, although probably more for the marathoners than for me, as you have to cut across the course at the point where the marathoners are beginning their second half. It would be nice if organizers could fix that. But still, this is a terrific race. In addition, DC is a wonderful place to visit at this time of year. Not too warm, and usually the cherry blossoms are out, making the air intoxicating. And let's face it, there's so much to see in this town. I don't usually do the touristy stuff, but there are things here that absolutely must be visited, like Arlington Cemetery, the Lincoln Memorial, the Mall, and the Vietnam Memorial. And of course, the various Smithsonian Museums - I visited a couple, and they absolutely blew me away. Great race, great town, great time of year. And organizers that seem to want to get better year after year. I really enjoy this race and this city.
5.0

By: Levi K.

Posted: April 04, 2011

Disappointed, overall.

The reason I gave 3 stars for the course is that it could be so much better. I think they could take the route through the National Mall or be able to hit more landmarks along the course. This marathon/half marathon event is getting BIG quick. Starting the full and half at different times would be an excellent idea. The course was jam-packed with half runners and it made it quite cramped. I think this event could be GREAT, but it was mediocre.
4.0

By: Eva C.

Posted: April 02, 2011

Great course but with no mile markers

Very scenic course, especially during the first 18 miles. Packet pick up, bag check, and finish line refreshments were very smooth - kudos for the organization. However, Garmin is a must, as I only recall seeing 3 mile markers.
5.0

By: Nancy S.

Posted: April 01, 2011

Great course, good fans, needed mile markers

This was my first time running the half. I loved the course and want to do the relay next year with my kids to give them the chance to run in Washington DC. I did my packet pick up mid-day on Friday so I did not have the parking delays and lines other runners mentioned. Loved having the armory to wait in before and after the race. We drove because we could not have made it from where we were staying (right by one of the Falls Church metro stations) in time. Got there at 5:30 and had no trouble parking. I realize the Metro opening time was not decided by the race directors, but it was a big problem. As was the lack of mile markers. I saw only one in the first 13 miles (and was actively looking for them). The one I did see I don't think was in the right place. I did not consider the race to be very hilly - but I do a lot of hill training. Plenty of post-race food. No race is perfect and these things can be fixed. I do plan to come back next year. You just can't beat running past the monuments.
4.0

By: Tom R.

Posted: March 31, 2011

Good race? Yes. Fair reviews? No.

I've run this race twice, and both times I've enjoyed it and have looked forward to doing it again. Volunteer support is top-notch, the medal is nice, and the course is fun/tough. Is it the best marathon you will ever run? Probably not. Is it anywhere near as bad as the negative reviews posted here? Most definitely not. I don't think the other reviewers here represent the race fairly. First, others have commented on the metro this year. While it's true that this convenience wasn't available this year, I think it should be noted that SunTrust and the event organizers do not actually control the DC metro. That seems to be shocking news to some, but I'm not sure why. Heeding the emails that the race sent me prior to the big day, I drove in and had NO problems getting in or out of the plentiful parking lots. When driving in and parking is the standard at 99.9% of all race events, I don't know why people are blasting this race over the metro. If anything, I experienced LESS hassle driving in to this event than I have at other major events. Second, I believe this is one of the few major multi-race events that sets a total entrant cap, and not a marathon cap and a separate half-marathon cap. Why fault this race for more people signing up for the half-marathon, which is arguably a more popular race distance in DC and elsewhere? To say something like this race is really for the half-marathoners as a sleight to this event is kind of dumb and incredibly elitist, in my opinion. Think about it; the half-marathoners pay WAY more (per mile) than the full marathoners do (in other words, they should complain that we are in THEIR way!). Of course, this event may slightly cater to half-marathoners, just like 99.9% of all other major events do. It's called majority rule, people. Rather than being snobby about it, marathoners should be grateful for half-marathoners; I'm quite sure that the half-marathon at most events subsidizes the full marathon. That is, without the companion half-marathon race, the full marathon typically wouldn't be economically feasible (evidence of this: relatively few marathon-only events take place in the US; countless half-marathon-only events take place in the US). That said, I didn't feel like I was at all treated as second-class for running the full marathon. I got to run two half-marathons and paid only marginally more than the single half-marathoners, lol. If anything, the half-marathoners were very enthusiastic in their cheering for the full marathoners (or maybe that was just the few thousand half-marathoners I saw/heard). Finally, to say this race is too expensive is just not fair either. I signed up early and paid a very low rate for an event of this quality level (significantly less than $120) - plus I got a tech shirt for registering. Just like 99.9% of all other major race events, if you wait until the last minute to sign up, you WILL pay a LOT. I paid $65 and I got two shirts, got to run a nice marathon through DC, got a nice medal, got to drink beer afterward, and got decent post-run food. I would have to be pretty clever to find a way to complain about that. P.S. This applies to comments on any race at this site: Garmins are not NASA-accurate, people. I seriously doubt this marathon, or any other major race course, is long or short. Maybe it's just me, but I'm thinking that most marathon (half-marathon) courses are in fact 26.2 (13.1) miles long and that most Garmins, mine included, provide an estimate of distance with (in some cases, substantial) error.
5.0

By: Brad A.

Posted: March 31, 2011

A very good regional marathon

In reading all the reviews about the race, there are certainly some valid points of improvement, but some of these are too critical. Although I have limited long-distance, road-racing experience, I was an NCAA D1 800 meter runner and had one half marathon under my belt prior to this race. My goal for this race was to run around 3:00 for the marathon and qualify for Boston (which I did). In terms of the half/full distribution, there are certainly more runners in the half. Toward the front of the pack, I was never concerned with too many people and I was able to utilize every water/PowerAde station available (aid station every 2 miles, enough volunteers calling out, "water," or "PowerAde"... very helpful). In terms of the mile markers in the first half, they were not very visible at all. I saw a marker at Mile 1 and then from Mile 8 onward. According to the race, this was due to a logistical error of getting the markers to the right place in the morning (since this was a logistical error, I am confident they will fix this problem next year). First half of the marathon was very nice in terms of going past several important landmarks. At the split for the full/half it was very clear that runners for the marathon moved left and half marathoners finished right... very simple. Also, I got a charge out of the field thinning out after 13 miles. I looked around at the other runners and said, "This is where the real race starts," which got some brief laughs. Even at the front of the pack (top 100-200 runners) I was still in constant contact with other runners of my ability. The second half of the race wasn't as beautiful as the first but I wasn't paying too much attention to the scenery (at this point in the race you shouldn't be looking around; you should be starting really to race the course). I loved around mile 20 and 23 where there were little loops, so I could see how far in front or how far back my competitors were. After mile 23 there were some rolling hills for a mile or so but nothing killer. After mile 25, it's a straight shot to RFK Stadium and the finish, which is great for seeing where your competitors are again. There were also few but very passionate supporters along the last 6 miles of the course. Finish line festival was alright but nothing spectacular. The medal and t-shirt were very nice. Overall this is a relatively fast course (only a few hills, and temperature throughout the race of 38-46). I thought that temperature would be too cold but BELIEVE ME - IT WAS THE PERFECT TEMP for running a marathon. P.S. The expo had some excellent speakers on injury prevention, proper athletic nutrition and marathon training. This isn't a world-class marathon, but I would certainly recommend it for either the half or the full.
4.0

By: Jason M.

Posted: March 30, 2011

Definitely could have been organized better

The packet pick-up parking situation left a lot to be desired. Ended up having my wife just drop me off and I ran in to the armory while she circled around RFK. The last-minute change in the Metro opening from 5 to 6 a.m. played havoc on both traffic and parking. The streets leading to the lots were overloaded and not moving. I ended up parking about 1/4-mile away and jogging to the starting corral. I would have liked to save my energy for the marathon. I agree with the earlier comment that the race felt more focused on half marathoners than full marathoners. (It felt like 80% of the runners only did the half.) I would recommend that organizers split the half-marathoners off much earlier in the race and that they consider offering a separate finishing tent for marathoners as well. When I finished at just over 4 hours, there was only one line for getting food and drink and we had to shuffle through slowly. There was lots of debris and trash all around as well. The race does has have long, slow hills. The harder ones, of course, came late in the race, between miles 23-25. The first half seemed less hilly.
3.0

By: Bonnie B.

Posted: March 30, 2011

Great (half) course, but no way to get there

This half-marathon course is my favorite course in DC, and I've run nearly all of them, from 5Ks to marathons. It runs through interesting areas that the tourists don't visit, and it's a great peek at some of the actual neighborhoods of DC. I also think it has the savviest spectators with the most clever signs. Previously I thought the race was nearly perfect: Take Metro in; run a really fun, somewhat challenging course with great volunteers and enthusiastic spectators; take the Metro home. This year, when Metro didn't open early enough, getting in and out was a nightmare by car. This is my last of these until the subway opens earlier or the race starts later. The lack of mile markers this year was puzzling, but that was clearly a bizarre glitch and they'll fix that. The cost is very high for a half, but to me, the race is worth it. Unfortunately the transportation headache is not.
4.0

By: Courtney W.

Posted: March 30, 2011

Enjoyable race

This was my 2nd marathon and my first National. I heard a lot of people complain about the course, but I liked it. Yes, it has a fairly big hill from ~5-7, but I knew that was there. There were a few other uphills in the first half that I wasn't expecting, but they weren't huge. Yes, some of the course goes through less than attractive areas, but that happens in big cities. Most of the first half is really nice and the parts along the water in the 2nd half are also quite nice. The couse was crowded but not enough to slow things down (except around corners) and was great once the half-marathoners split off. I think the biggest issue was in the organization of the parking/start. First of all, they need some signage to direct people who are driving. We carpooled and got there quite early, so we had no problems getting into a lot; but as those filled, things apparently got more chaotic. Opening the metro earlier would also be helpful. Then the start itself, they have assigned "corrals," but they are not enforced. This year, in addition to the elite corral, there were 10 corrals with different colored stickers on the bibs for what corral you were supposed to be in. However, the corrals were an open free-for-all and people just ended up wherever. This makes for a congested start. Also, the pace groups were out of order and not in the corral they belonged in either. The 4:00 group started ahead of the 3:50 and 3:55 groups, which further confuses people about what corral they should be in. Packet pick-up/expo were fine. Shirt was OK and I really liked the medal. Bag check worked really well. Post-race food was OK, but I've seen 5Ks with better spreads. I didn't go as fast here as I had hoped but that is the fault of the training - not the race. The volunteers were great, especially in the late miles. There were two drum lines along the river that were great. Yes, there are fewer spectators than in some races, but the ones that were there were very supportive to everyone. One note: be sure to pay attention when you are registering because there is a space where you can enter what you want printed on your bib. Some people must have missed that field and were disappointed. I liked having my name on my bib because, especially toward the end, the volunteers would call me by name and say something encouraging.
3.0

By: Alissa M.

Posted: March 29, 2011

Easy fixes could make it a great race

I agree with all of the comments from previous posters. This has the potential to be a great event if the race directors made some easy changes: 1) MILE MARKERS - cannot be said enough. How much money could 26 cardboard signs cost? Don't even need the official timer at all the miles, runners just need to see at least one marker before mile 11, especially since the tunnels messed up Garmins...the back half of the marathon had more markers, but seriously, nothing to even note mile 26 for exhausted runners who couldn't see where the finish line was over the hill at the end?? 2) I was not one of the people who suffered on the Metro since it seemed there was no way to make it from official race hotels across town to the race within an hour. Luckily I was able to chase down one of the few cabs available, but seems like there could be some shuttle options from official race hotels if the Metro isn't an option. 3) The expo packet pickup was somewhat of a nightmare. Since it's only open one day, there was a huge rush late afternoon, which was really the only option for out-of-towners. Wasn't a problem to pick up marathon bibs, but also was picking up for some half-marathon friends and the lines were completely disorganized and took forever...after that, we didn't even want to stay and walk around the expo. Other than that, I have nothing but positive things to say about the race - loved running through the capitol and that made up for a less-scenic 2nd half, the volunteers were extremely friendly and crowd support was surprisingly good especially for an early race, and being able to stay warm in the Armory before the race was a nice perk. I would definitely recommend this race to others if the race directors take reviews to heart and make those simple changes everyone is suggesting.
4.0

By: Brendan K.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Terrible organization

This was my first and last time running this marathon. The absence of mile markers was shocking. The first time I knew for certain how far and fast I was running was at the 10k mark. After that I counted no more than 4 mile markers. One (at 23) was being held up by a young girl at a water stop. At the end of the water stop (about 20 yards away) a volunteer called out 23.2 miles. I appreciate the effort all volunteers make but what is the point of calling out incorrect information? I endorse what has been said earlier about the metro situation. I went to the Farragut West stop at 6. I waited for about 15 minutes for the station to open and another 20 for the first train to arrive. I had just enough time to check my bag in (where the volunteers were very helpful) and run to the start. I found the course itself mainly fine. I liked the quiet parts in the second half as well as the large crowds in areas such as Columbia Heights. I thought the people cheering us on were great. Finally isn't it time that some large marathon has the decency to mail out our bib numbers instead of requiring runners from out of town to take several hours off work in order to pick them up the day before? I am sure I wasn't the only runner to spend far too much time driving to and from the expo on Friday afternoon.
3.0

By: Tatyana M.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Excellent course, good for PR

This is my 2nd overall marathon and first National. I've read runners' comments from years before and I must say that the organizers have been improving. Corrals were very well organized, there was no stampede at the start line. Of course when we lost half marathoners, it became almost sparse, but I personally prefer it this way. Yes, the first half is more scenic, but I cannot complain about the second half. I think the support was great - a lot of people were out in pretty cold weather. Hydration stations were well manned. There were no big crowds at the finish and you did not have to wait for a long time for your banana or bottle of water. The course is fairly flat, and gets hilly at the end (study the elevation chart). I will definitely run it again!
5.0

By: Sara W.

Posted: March 28, 2011

OK course, but poor organization

I have run about 15 half-marathons in many different cities and this was by far the most poorly organized race I've ever participated in. Packet pick-up was a nightmare: snarling traffic, lines to get in to the armory and even longer lines to pick up your race number. Race day was no different. Having never run this race before, and not being all that familiar with DC, we chose to drive to the start instead of attempting the Metro. (Also, given packet pickup, we figured bag check would be equally disorganized.) BIG mistake. Traffic was so backed up that we ended up parking the car about a mile away and following other runners to the start, which we got to with about 3 minutes to spare. The first half of the course was pretty scenic, but with no mile markers on the course it was distracting that you didn't know exactly where you were. The only mile markers I saw were 10 and 11. And, the water stations were only apparent once you were on top of them. Plus, no GU, which was fine for me, but probably pretty disappointing for other runners since it was promised at mile 3. The pros: The medal was decent and the post-race refreshments were good: Chocolate milk, fruit, bagels and pretzels.
3.0

By: Lauren K.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Room for improvement, but nice race

The weather was beautiful, and the race actually was better-organized than I expected (plus, the volunteers were amazingly enthusiastic). Here are my suggestions for improvements: 1) I understand that opening the Metro earlier isn't feasible, given the ridership numbers. However, all the race hotels are far from the start. My suggestion, in the case that opening the Metro earlier isn't possible, is that the official race hotels should offer shuttle service to the start. 2) More porta-johns are needed during the first half of the marathon, when the field is more crowded. I once had to wait 5 minutes to get an empty porta-potty that was disappointing. 3) There should be more mile markers, and they should be accurate. I'd regularly see a 'Mile X' sign at an aid station, and then see 'Mile X' written in chalk about 100 yards after the station. This made it difficult to gauge what my exact splits were, and to pace myself accordingly. 4)It would have been more scenic and encouraging if the second loop had been reversed if running in Anacostia, for example, had been completed by mile 18, instead of starting at mile 21. It would have been nice to have run by the Capitol towards the end of the race. 5) Finally, after a generally beautiful course, it was disappointing to finish on the cracked pavement of RFK's parking lot. A prettier, more climactic (or at least evenly paved) finish would be ideal.
4.0

By: David T.

Posted: March 28, 2011

One more comment - GREAT Volunteers!!

One more comment and then I'll yield the floor: the volunteers at the water stations and elsewhere were terrific, enthusiastic, friendly and supportive. Any negative comments I may have made in my earlier review are about the organizers and certain organizational aspects, but THANK YOU to the volunteers who made all the difference on a cold, blustery day.
4.0

By: David T.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Lots of good, lots of bad

Tim Whitmire's summary below is brilliant. The absence of mile markers (and kind of haphazard placement of those that were on the course) made it really tough to know whether you were on pace or not. After months of publicity about taking the Metro to the start, to announce no more than a week before that the Metro was opening at 6 a.m., not 5 a.m., is really unconscionable. It made getting to the start (via cab if you were lucky enough to find one) really stressful. Now for the good stuff: registration and packet pick-up (once parking could be found) was easy and smooth. Bag check on race day was terrific. I thought the corral organization was ok. The route was inspiring, beautiful, and interesting. As cold as it was, the sun was out, the cherry blossoms were in bloom, and our capital looked its best. And the route, especially for the full, reminded us that Washington is a city full of interesting neighborhoods, beautiful houses, lovely public areas, and some that are like any other big city. The fan support, especially around Howard University and the area between Dupont Circle and Howard, was amazing. The finish line was handled well, and the food array was excellent (I never knew a Safeway glazed donut could taste so good). All in all, I would do it again. But it's strange that people keep making the same criticisms year after year and nothing seems to be done about it (and the Metro situation actually got worse). Wonder what's going on.
4.0

By: Jennifer H.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Great Half Marathon Course with Historic DC Views!

The race was fairly well organized with lots of directions/logistical information given beforehand. The packet pick-up was a little messy with a long wait, and the expo was nothing really to write about. If I were a full marathon runner, I probably would have been disappointed. The course itself was beautiful, going past all of the historic sites in downtown DC. The fans were a little sparse, but thank god for Howard near the end, blasting energetic hip-hop to get me through the end of the race! Great course with well marked turns, and even though it was only 16,000 runners, I was never alone. The water stations were fine, but I could not find the GU stations that were supposed to be there.
4.0

By: Buckeye Runner

Posted: March 28, 2011

Solid Marathon

The not so good: - Metro&it is all about money. Wonder how much it would cost to open 1 hour earlier? Im sure more than we can ever imagine. DC has NO money! Do you think they should increase registration fee to subsidize the Metro on race day? I dont. We just need to get over this one. - Mile Markers: this one is not acceptable. Every mile should be marked and for a marathon of this size clocks should be placed along the route a key milestones. The good: - Course: fast! Enjoyed the major sites as well as neighborhoods, but after 20 or so (not sure because of absences of mile markers) not as good. But, hey this is the only marathon run entirely in the district. Please dont compare Garmin data to the official course. Is it fair to say a small wrist worn GPS is more accurate that a certified course? I love running with the halfers&and when we split that is when I know Im with the real runners! - Medal: cool with ionic symbol of White House. Wonder if they change it each year with another symbol? - Aid stations: stocked well with water, sports drinks, and GU - EXPO: more than I thought it would be THANKS TO THE POLICE AND VOLUNTEERS!
4.0

By: Scot S.

Posted: March 28, 2011

regressed from last year

Mile markers were an issue in 2010, but it was even worse this year. Nobody I know saw an actual mile marker before mile 10 (I did see a clock at mile 1 and the mat at 10K, but those are still long gaps between being able to orient yourself). Even Michael Wardian, who knows a thing or two about pacing, ended up 4 minutes off his goal, and I have to wonder if poor signage played a factor. This hasn't been an issue in other races I've run, so why can't this race figure it out? Getting to the race also was worse than last year. Even assuming that the race can't afford, despite higher than average race fees, to pay Metro to open at 5 or 5:30, there are things that can be done so that the surrounding area doesn't gridlock. For example, give people less-used alternate routes so that everyone doesn't approach on the same 3 streets, and provide attendants in the parking lots to keep traffic moving away from the entrance. This is my home course (it passes five blocks from my house), but if the organizers show no interest in improving the experience, I'm not sure I'll be back.
3.0

By: Eric L.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Terrible - Stay Away

Same comments as everyone else with regards to the metro, the missing GU station, and the mile markers. You might expect something like this for your local 500-person marathon, but it is just absurd at a race like this. There are so many better options; the course is not that spectacular that you need to put up with everything else. I recommend staying away.
2.0

By: Alison E.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Has potential, but needs work!!

Well, let me start by saying that I got engaged MID RACE so it will go down as my most memorable marathon ever (and I look back at it in a positive light b/c of the engagement), BUT I want to leave some comments because the race needs work and could be much better! The first sign of trouble was when we were trying to get to the lots to park but there were no signs so we made a wrong turn (with hundreds of other cars) and ended up in grid-locked traffic at 6:30. When we finally got to the parking lots it was 6:50 and we had no time to go to the bathroom. The corrals were such a sh*t show that we just went into the first corral we saw. What was with the corral line up?! Instead of going in a straight line like most races, the corrals snaked through the parking lot at RFK. Big mess. It's too bad that we didnt make time to go to the bathroom pre-race because the race started late (so we might have had time) and then we found the port-o-potty situation in the race to be a total nightmare. I'm currently pregnant so I had to use the bathroom a lot (granted, that's on me, not them, but...) and we spent THIRTY minutes mid race waiting in LONG lines. Unacceptable! The water stations were ok, but I did notice that there was no GU as promised until later miles. The miles were also very poorly marked - I only noticed some. Clocks along the course would also be nice. The course was decent, but I think the course after the 1/2 way point could be re-jigged to be a little more interesting. The part right after the half marathoners broke away was really weird...I felt like we were running backstage or something, it hardly seemed like a marathon course and we had to deal with all the half runners darting infront of us to get across the course! Not cool to the halfers that did this and to the directors for setting it up this way. This isn't totally the fault of the directors, but the road was treacherous! I saw a number of runners fall. Maybe cones could be put up by pot holes, or maybe they could be marked with spray paint or something. I didn't mind the loneliness of the 2nd half of the course, but the point where we did that turn around the bucket was so weird! It went from feeling like a large marathon to a tiny backyard production. The medal was nice this year, nicer than pics from past years that I've seen. I think its cool that they put different DC landmarks on each medal - mine was the White House and my fiance's was the Supreme Court - neat idea. The shirt on the other hand was awful. It's so cheap looking and the design looks very poorly done. Having paid so much money in entry fees, I expected a little bit more. It's also not too warm when this race rolls around, so longsleeved is always a nice touch! Better material and higher quality printing would help. I did like that there were plenty of sizes to choose from, I put XS down when I registered but they were tiny so I went with the Small when I got there. The expo could also use some beefing up - it was rather lackluster. I suggest going to a company that puts on large races and seeking their advice (ex: New York Road Runners, they do an incredible job with a much larger race in a much larger city). Anyway, as I said, the race will go down in history as one of the best for my fiance and I - but I just wanted to leave some comments in the hopes that the next time we come back to run it again there will have been some improvements made!
3.0

By: Kieran G.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Nice course but where were the mile markers?!

I ran the full marathon and I enjoyed the scenic course as well as the lively spectators. One thing that was very troublesome was the lack of mile markers, and some of the ones that were there were wrong. I missed mile markers 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 17 and 26. Mile markers 22 and 25 were incorrect. This really takes a toll on you because you have no way of gauging your pace so I just treated this more like a long run than an actual race. I was satisfied with my time, but I would not recommend this race to anyone unless they can fix this. On a good note the aid stations were excellent, well placed, well stocked, and the volunteers were very encouraging and cheerful.
4.0

By: Eliz M.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Not sure I would recommend this marathon

The volunteers were fantastic!! On the other hand, the course was really hilly, the marathoners seemed second-class compared to the half marathon runners, and there's a general lack of organization: no corral enforcement, no mile markers until mile 10, very crowded first half, etc.
2.0

By: Deborah L.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Some glitches, but good race

This was my first marathon, so I don't have a lot to compare it to. So, with that grain of salt: Pros:  I loved the course, including the 2nd half. Not just the monuments, but DC's neighborhoods and long stretches along the water. Beautiful. Race staff were incredibly responsive to questions The start went well I loved the support throughout the city. Not large crowds but lots of spirit. Nice medal Cons: No GU at all during the first half. There was supposed to be one station (not enough) with GU, but it was out. Too much emphasis on the half. Very discouraging to hear all of those "almost there" cheers at mile 12. An official car driving down the course behind me at one point. Inexcusable! Poor food by the time I crossed the finish line; the party was over. So-so shirt.
5.0

By: Andrew P.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Disappointing

Ran the 2011 half. There were maybe 3 mile markers and no time on the course. For the amount I paid to run, that is terrible. Water stations were decent, but no GU (I bring my own, but thought they were supposed to have it available, which probably hurt some people). Not opening the metro early was a terrible decision. Coming from VA, the earliest I could have gotten on the Metro was 6:16 and I would not have gotten to the start until 6:46. So any delays on the Metro may have made me late.
2.0

By: Jessica R.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Full Marathon still needs work

The most important thing to get right is the distance, and it was definitely wrong. I clocked in at over 27 miles, and trust me, I run the tangents. The mile markers were slim. I think I only saw a couple throughout the course, and some of them were spray painted on the ground. This is an easy fix. Put big mile markers out, and put them in the right spots. The organizers need to do whatever they have to do to get the metro opened at 5am next year. I can only imagine the panic anyone running a first marathon must have felt getting off the metro with only a few minutes to get to the start. With a cap of 10,000 half and 3,000 full this race is still geared towards the half marathon. There were times I wondered if I had missed a split off somewhere, as I literally had no other full runners around me. This doesn't necessarily bother me, but if you decide to run the full, be prepared for numerous spectators around miles 10-13 screaming 'you're almost done, just a couple left!' Could be considered a little discouraging... The course is nice- several views of the monuments but cutting out some of those tunnels which really affect gps accuracy would be nice. Overall, this is a good race that could be great with a couple improvements. But unless the organization can guarantee an accurate 26.2, I doubt many people would return.
3.0

By: David Trevino

Posted: March 28, 2011

Somewhat different from previous years

I have run the full marathon four times, and the half only once. The only good thing(s) I can say about this year is the course is great, and the crowd support was good. I even earned my 2012 Boston Qualifier. However, the organization seems to have slipped a little. 1st: the driving directions from National to the stadium were lousy; 2nd: the metro opening at 6 a.m. did not give runners ample time to get to the DC Armory Metro, turn in their bags, and then make it to their proper coral area. I am a dedicated supporter of this event, as well as the Marine Corps Marathon, and plan to return next year - I hope that I, and other runners who may share the same feeling, do not have to experience this same transportation issue again.
4.0

By: Rick S.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Good Race

This was my first marathon so I don't have any others to compare it to yet. Having said that, I enjoyed my experience in Washington. I thought that the spectators were remarkable. I was surprised to see as many of them in the second half of the race and they were very encouraging. The course was fun. Yes, miles 20 through 26 were not as exciting at the 1st 20 but not bad. I had a bit of trouble with the mile markers on the first half of the course since there were so many more people with the half marathoners. These could have been put in a more observable area. Overall though, it was a really good race. I really liked the finisher medal and expo and the volunteers were all very friendly and helpful to me.
5.0

By: Mike C.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Great course, but big issues

I ran the 1/2 marathon, and agree with the previous comments about the course. It offered lots of landmarks, a great area of loud and supportive spectators in Dupont Circle and around mile 6/7, and was sufficiently challenging with lots of rolling hills and only one real nasty uphill around mile 6. However, there were also major, major issues with the race organization. I found the lines at the expo to be unacceptably long, with only one metal detector open for 'security' when I went around lunch hour Friday. Also, the bib collection lines were very long and slow. They really need to consider having the expo open for two days, or at least earlier in the day on Friday, to cut down on the lines. The lack of mile markers were ridiculous, although there was a rumor that some of them were stolen. If you didn't have a GPS, you were probably guessing a lot. There were markers at Mile 1, 5 (I think) and maybe another one. Worse yet, there was only one clock, and it was at Mile 1! Echoing a prior comment, I also think the course was mis-measured. My Garmin had it at 13.35 miles. I hit the 10K pad at 6.5 miles. I could understand a slight discrepancy, but something was definitely wrong there. The finish area also had issues. The food lines were slow and backed up into the finishing chute. There were no clear indications of where the bag check area was (turned out it was in the Amory). Also, the race website did not have the official results up at 3PM as promised; and, as of this morning, still appears to only have copy and pasted results from a PDF file, meaning splits are still not available. And the results aren't even searchable by your name! I would run this race again, but only because of the great course. Organizers really need to address the lack of mile markers and measure that course out again!
3.0

By: Jennifer R.

Posted: March 28, 2011

Metro Madness

This was my first time running the Suntrust Marathon. I chose to use the metro on race morning. I got myself to the metro at 6 a.m. and then waited 24 minutes for it to arrive. There was chaos coming off the metro at the stadium. The gun had fired as I was walk-running to the starting line. I never made it to my corral. I just merged with the crowd and started to run. Please, please make changes with the metro schedule for next year. It needs to be opened earlier on the morning of the race. The t-shirt was great. I liked how all of the sites we ran past were listed on the front of the shirt. I got some really great clothing deals at the expo - 50% off Nike, Zoot, Saucony... a true runner's delight.
4.0

By: Tim Whitmire

Posted: March 27, 2011

Still not getting it done

This was my 21st marathon and 19th state in my 50+DC quest. Thought I'd give this a try for my D.C. marathon to a) avoid the hordes at Marine Corps; and b) run a course more oriented toward the city and its sights. I was aware that there had been organizational concerns in this race's earlier years and was hopeful that those had been ironed out, but they clearly haven't been. Here were the problems: 1) Course was poorly marked and insufficiently timed. When they did exist, mile markers occurred only at odd-numbered miles and (at least according to my Garmin) were frequently inaccurate. There were at most 4 or 5 official time clocks on the course, adding to the sense of disorganization. Particularly annoying was the fact that, as a group of us passed in front of the Armory at about mile 13.5, security officers allowed a horde of half-marathoners and spectators to cross the course, causing myself and several other marathoners to have to come to a stop while we yelled at the officers and they tried to restore order and clear the course. 2) Getting to the start was a nightmare. Metro officials declined to open the subway an hour early (5 a.m. for a 7 a.m. race start) this year, citing insufficient ridership the last couple of years. But there were absolutely no cabs to be found on the street at 6 a.m. and I was unwilling to try driving after the nightmare of traffic and parking around the Armory (adjacent to the race start) for packet pickup on Friday. Instead, I was one of the thousands of runners who crammed onto the Metro, waited for a transfer at Metro Center and got stuck in human traffic jam as we all tried to exit the station up the one working escalator and then dashed for the start line as the gun went off in the distance. That's no way to start a 26.2-mile race. 3) Too little bang for the buck. This marathon costs almost $120 in registration fees by the time you get done adding the online fee. I'm generally not one to complain too much about these things, and the medal was fine, but the race shirt is made of a cheap, technical fabric and is poorly cut, and there was no other swag. I might feel differently if I felt like the extra money went to ensuring a well-organized race, but it didn't seem to. 4) Marathon or half-marathon? As is increasingly the case, half-marathoners by far outnumbered marathoners, and ran with us until well into their 13th mile, leading to that "Where'd everybody go?" feeling after they split off that is so deflating at the start of the third quarter of a marathon. As at Louisville (which I ran in '07), you end up feeling as though the race is really about the half-marathoners (and their registration fees), with the full an afterthought - particularly when the half-marathon finishers get as nice a shirt and medal as you do, as they did here. For me, this was further exacerbated by the incident in front of the Armory that I alluded to in Point 1. (One note, to the extent race organizers are reading these comments: At the Mississippi Blues Marathon in Jackson (which I ran in January), they split the half-marathoners off fairly early in the race and give them medals that are clearly distinguished from the marathon medals. As a marathoner, I appreciated both those touches.) Positives: I enjoyed the course and appreciated that it took us not only past sights like the Capitol, the Washington Monument and the White House, but also through some of the city's tougher neighborhoods. Some of the streets weren't in great condition but, hey, that's urban America for you. With the exception of what happened in front of the Armory, the course was well-policed and the water stations were clearly marked, well-staffed and fully stocked with PowerAde, water and GU.
3.0

By: Mark K.

Posted: March 27, 2011

1/2 marathon still needs improvements

The good: the course, the fan support, the expo, the finisher's medal's unique design. The bad: metro not opening up until 6 a.m. (for a 7 a.m. race start), lack of clearly marked miles, and no GU on the half-marathon course. Also, I think the course was long... my GPS measured 13.27 miles for the half marathon course and I cut all of the corners tight.
3.0

By: Desiree C.

Posted: March 27, 2011

would not run the full marathon again

My first "issue" was that the mile markers were not well marked at all... there were multiple miles that I didn't see any markers at all. Also the course went throw several tunnels in which my Garmin lost signal, which then made my Garmin off with the milage markers that I did see. I didn't use the metro because I assumed that it would be really tight with timing; and from what I gathered, this is in fact true. The metro was my first choice of transportation to the start when I assumed that it opened at the same time that it did last year (5 a.m.). Part of the second half of the marathon went through uninteresting, industrial neighborhoods; however, I was pleasantly surprised that there was still a pretty good amount of crowd support in that area, which was nice.
3.0

By: Mickey T.

Posted: April 20, 2010

Might as well just be a half....

The weaving in the first four miles bordered on absurd. Like most other posters, I lined up about where I expected to run (ran 8:45/mile tape to tape) but was overrun by most who disregarded the corrals. Only got relief by SKIPPING THE FIRST TWO WATER STATIONS and running down the middle. Nothing like waiting until mile 6 of a marathon for two ounces of water. That said, this is is actually a cool race for the first half, with good scenery and good crowds on the sidelines. Then you hit mile 14 and it's rough for the next 10 miles. The neighborhoods get a bit scarce and you inexplicably do an out-and-back to the coast guard station (which is deserted on weekends). The Anacostia bit is even worse because it's very humid and the support amounted to one guy on a bike making sure no one collapsed. The finish to RFK was ok, but the finishing festival was really weak for the price. To add on other posts, it was half-closed by the time I finished (3:45.) Getting there was annoying, getting out was worse and it had at least double the number of people it could realistically support. The organizers should really just focus on running a good half marathon and strictly enforce the seeding corrals.
3.0

By: Ken M.

Posted: March 31, 2010

Enjoyed running the half marathon

This was my first half marathon and I thought it went fairly well. The actual race was a pleasure, and the course was just fantastic. There are some other comments about the water stops being disorganized, but I didn't find that; there were tables on both sides of the road, with water first and PowerAde second. They were set up every two miles starting at mile 1. The only complaints I had were: 1. Parking was a disaster (next time I'll take Metro); I don't know what happened, but the traffic to get in wasn't moving at all (next time maybe have more then one lot open); 2. it would have been nice to have a detailed map of the start/finish area in the pre-race package.
4.0

By: Frank P.

Posted: March 31, 2010

Good overall experience with potential to be great

This was my 3rd marathon and my first National Marathon. There was a lot to like, but there are things to improve as well. But this is still a young race and the race directors are open to feedback. The Good: The first half of the course was amazing. It is one of the things that convinced me to sign up for this race. The course passed the capitol twice, and if you were paying attention on Constitution Avenue, we also passed the White House. The volunteers were very helpful and supportive. This was appreciated. You can never underestimate the value of this. Thank you, volunteers! I must commend the young volunteer at mile 23. He handed me a cup of PowerAde, which I dropped, splashing his white t-shirt with red. He ran after me with another cup. Much appreciated. Having an indoor bag check at the armory and having the armory available for early arrivals was a good idea. You never know what the weather will be like on race day, so having a place for early arrivals to wait was great. Great fan support in the first half of the race, The area around Howard University had the best support on the course. A "thank you" to the law enforcement officers along the course. I was never worried at any part of the course and they also provided good fan support. My favorite was the officer at Mile 24 who said to me, "Hey buddy, you have 2 miles left and you're looking good." I was glad the course showed a good cross-section of the District of Columbia, showing both the touristy areas as well as urban areas. The expo was good, although a little on the small side. Bib and t-shirt pick up were easy, and everyone was very pleasant and helpful. I liked having my name on my bib; having fans cheer you by name gives you a nice boost. I liked the medal and the t-shirt, I would have preferred a long sleeve tech t-shirt, but that's just personal preference. The Bad: The start of the race was a bit chaotic. The corrals were not clearly marked, and we had such a hard time finding our corral that we went to the last one. The area at was a bit tight, making getting to your corrals difficult. This would not have been a problem, but the races started and ended in RFK Stadium's parking lot, which is a huge complex. This space could have been used better. Parts of the course were picturesque, but there were also two hairpin turns, one on Constitution Avenue and one in Anacostia Park. I would have preferred avoiding those, especially if it were possible to have the course go through Georgetown. Having the course go through K and H Streets - where the roads were full of potholes due to the construction - was not the best idea. I'm sure this will not be the case next year when the work is completed, but keeping one eye on the race and one eye out for potholes was a bit stressful. It would have been nice to have a few more porta-potties on the course. While the volunteers were very pleasant and helpful, some were not properly prepped. The tables for the water stops early in the race should have been covered with filled water cups before the runners got there. Several times at the beginning of the race we had to wait while the volunteer filled the water cups and then handed them to us. Also, next year please use paper cups instead of plastic; they are green, but also are easier to bend in order to create a funnel out of which to drink water on the run. Overall: The race was a great experience. This is still a young race and I'm sure these issues will be addressed.
4.0

By: Jeremy L.

Posted: March 29, 2010

Nice first half

The 2010 edition was the first full National Marathon that I've run. Last year I ran the half and thoroughly enjoyed the course. That being said, the second half of the marathon could use some improvement. Upon leaving the National Mall, the course meanders through some pretty boring scenery - including some nondescript industrial areas near the Anacostia Riverfront. If I were RD, I would add more miles along the National Mall and into Rock Creek Park and Georgetown. If you're looking for a lot of crowd support, it is only in certain places and mostly during the first half of the race. The race is growing every year, and they definitely listened to comments from last year about the location of the start (not directly next to the porta-potties this year!). All in all, a good race, and the weather usually cooperates.
3.0

By: Paul K.

Posted: March 29, 2010

Start the marathon earlier than the half

I felt that the marathon runners were second-class citizens in this race. Most of the best scenery was in the first half, and it didn't help to have all of the volunteers at mile 12 keep shouting that they only had a mile to go while handing them gels. The pluses were that you get to run through the capitol on a Saturday morning. Also being able to wait inside at the DC Armory was a plus. It was nice and peaceful once the half finished. Word of warning to those expecting a flat course: It is not! I would say it is up there with NYC in terms of hills and elevation, and mile 24 is quite challenging on tired legs. I would recommend the race, but be prepared for the first half.
3.0

By: Robert M.

Posted: March 29, 2010

Great Experience, Great Race, Great City.

This was the earliest marathon I've ever run and it was probably the warmest. I have no complaints about the race, organization, or crowd. The crowd was sparse, but considering it's a small marathon and has a 7 a.m. start, I wasn't surprised. The start was very disorganized. Believe it or not, I didn't know which direction the start was in. I never made it to a corral and I'm not sure anyone did. It was dark and that was interesting, but we all took it in stride. Why get stressed out about something silly like that? I can't believe some earlier posts saying that they didn't get any water or gels. There were plenty of both. We can only blame ourselves for dehydrating or not being prepared. I passed some by because there were so many. The finish was perfect, considering the size of the race, and the volunteers were fantastic. One complaint: I called the race hotline twice during the weeks before the race, and both times I was told that Lot 7 would be open during the race for family to come and meet you at the finish. At the expo I was told the same. My family got to the lot and it was closed. they drove around for an hour looking for a place to park before double parking near the finish and waiting for me. This was a little upsetting, but we took this in stride as well. The best thing about the race, however, was the course. It was a brilliant day and it was very exciting passing by the many historic sights. In the last mile, while going over the bridge to the stadium, a bald eagle flew over us. Amazing. Lots of fun.
5.0

By: Scot S.

Posted: March 25, 2010

improving

I've run this race the last 3 years, and the organization improves each year. Still, there is room for improvement. For example, since they require qualifying times, they should corral people by their qualifying times, and they should enforce the corrals. I had to dodge people walking the first couple of miles. Also, the post-race spread is still bare-bones. And the medal was a step backward from last year's. But the shirt is a step up, so I guess it evens out.
3.0

By: NC RunningGal

Posted: March 25, 2010

PW on the 1/2 marathon; water stop chaos

Having grown up in the DC area, I was looking forward to running the National Half Marathon for the first time. Unfortunately, this was by far my worst running experience. I will admit I was a little rusty on the pre-race rhythm and could have hydrated a little better - YET, when I started out, I found it VERY hard to really gauge anything in this race due to poor organization. I usually run a steady pace just shy of 8 min/mile. I was trying to find my corral YET no markings available at the start line. Total chaos. Don't hear the gun go off, yet figure time to run. The crowds were all compacted, so I aimed on doing a little weaving to get into some space to run my pace. First mile 8:30 (I thought), but then it really seemed the mile markings were random (as others with GPS commented on), and I had trouble gauging my pace. I thought I was running 8-minute miles, but apparently not. Worse yet was the water situation. It was so VERY hard to even see the location of the water tables - sometimes on one side of the road, sometimes on another. The water and Gatorade folks were standing all interspersed, versus the typical "Water! Water!" folks in front and "Gatorade! Gatorade!" towards the end of the stop. Cups were plastic, so you couldn't form a crease/"funnel" so as to help the fluid get into your mouth. Splash. Splash. Little ability to take solid gulps of fluid. I ended up getting seriously dehydrated around mile 8 (after the hills)... felt very ill, dizzy, shakes, heart racing. The police officer had no idea where the aid station was. I kept asking people, "Where is the first aid station?" Finally, at mile 10, I found a paramedic truck on the side of the road. Got EKG monitoring and pulse... still 160 after having walked. I asked for water and they at first said they "didn't have any." Finally, the guy said, "Well, you can actually have my bottle of water." I gulp it down. Eventually I head back to the race. Still having trouble finding the side of the road with the water stops. Thankfully I had brought 2 PowerGels with me, which helped lessen the impact of the dehydration. I ran 2 miles, and by mile 12 felt like myself again and picked up my pace for a kick. Split times 7:52 at 10K followed by a 9:28 for the race. I would second the recommendations regarding getting better organization for: 1. adhering to time corrals for start line; 2. making sure mile markers are visible and accurate, 3. sticking with water stations on one side of the road only, with a longer set of tables with water first and Gatorade second (and teaching volunteers how to yell loudly which it is, and getting paper cups); 4. rechecking the topo map regarding the elevation gain on the hills per GPS reports; 5. having CLEARLY marked aid stations. Had my dehydration gotten any worse, it could have possibly been dangerous to my health to have to keep searching for medical attention. Although it was a blast running around the capitol and other neighborhoods, I do not want to run this again unless the organizers can indeed organize this race better. The sheer size of it necessitates that it be WELL organized.
4.0

By: Lulu E.

Posted: March 24, 2010

Great Race

This was a great race and the miles went by extremely fast! If you love DC, you will love running through the city! The fans were great (could have been more). The weather was beautiful and it runners were able to see ALL parts of DC. The downsides: there needed to be more water stops towards the end...it was very hot! Also, the hills at the VERY end are hard when your body is already dead. Not all miles are very clearly marked. Race packet/bag of goodies could have been much better. Be prepared to get up at 4am to be at metro by 5am.
3.0

By: Andrew E.

Posted: March 24, 2010

My first marathon. Great race.

This was my 1st marathon and I'm really pleased with the entire experience. The course was great, especially running downtown by the monuments, etc. Great volunteers at all the water stops! Really helpful and lots of them. All in all, I really enjoyed it. No major complaints other than the hills in the last 2-3 miles. If they were in the beginning, I guess I wouldn't have cared or noticed them as much, but they were much tougher than I expected right at the end. Made it tough for a good final push. Otherwise, really fantastic day.
4.0

By: Jack B.

Posted: March 24, 2010

A very pleasant half course

The positives: (1) first half of this course is fast and visually stunning as you run by many of the D.C. monuments; (2) the tech shirt is one of the better ones given; (3) I also thought allowing participants to lounge in the adjacent armory before the race was a good touch to stay out of the cold; (4)the half was fairly flat with occasional rolling hills. There is noticable climb at miles 6-8. My criticisms: (1) water stations from miles 13-26 were way too random, i.e. some were placed 2 miles apart; (2) if you don't have a Garmin/GPS, be prepared to only see random mile markers; (3) really noticeable hills at miles 14-15, 24-26 were challenging given the race's express representation that its a fast course. All in all, this was my 6th marathon and I ran my second fastest time. So I would rate this marathon 3.5 stars out of 5.
3.0

By: Carl J.

Posted: March 23, 2010

Good Course; 'Billing' as Fast Course Not Deserved

The run through Washington DC was great; it was a good course and just fun to run through the Nation's Capitol and neighborhoods. However, the billing as one of the fastest marathons or half-marathons was definitely only applicable for the elite runners and a few others in the first rows of runners. What happened to the wave/corral start? For people like myself (running the Half) who started where their pace was indicated, the first mile or more was excruciatingly slow; there was nowhere to go. The road at the start and continuing for at least a mile was much too narrow to accommodate the field - all you could do was grin and bear it - or get frustrated. Consequently, at least the first, and really the first two water/hydration stops were useless. If you weren't on the side of the road where they were, you couldn't get to them. (Even after that it was sometimes confusing where water was and where Powerade was.) The congestion issue could have been fixed through the corral/wave start that was advertised; what happened to it? Those issues notwithstanding, I enjoyed the race. The hills were definitely present, but the course was a good one, spectators were often enthusiastic and plentiful, and the weather was great. If you still want to become a large, premiere race - you need to keep in mind that there are more folks to please than the handful of elite runners. There may have been many who would have like to shoot for PRs, but race logistics at the start made that virtually impossible.
4.0

By: David Trevino

Posted: March 23, 2010

Another Great Year for the National

This is my 5th straight year in running this event (4 marathons and 1 half), and all I can say is that it gets better and better each year. The Washington DC area has two of the best marathon events in the Nation - the National and the Marine Corps. Anyone looking for a good marathon event to run in early Spring (National), or in the fall (Marine Corps) look no further - you will not be disappointed. The course for the National can be a little challenging (some slight rolling hills here and there), but with the proper training (running hills, and hill repeats) the course can be a breeze. The crowd support tends to increase every year, and it was good to even see some of the district police cheering on the runners. The water stations, I felt, were adequate. My only negative, and it is minor, is directed to the expo - the 'Official Merchandise' section was small, and even some of the merchandise had not arrived - there was a board that listed the items that were expected to come in, but like anything else in life - mistakes can, and will, happen. All and all, another good year for the National.
5.0

By: Nicholas A.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Good course but not the best

I enjoyed the course and it helped it was such a nice day. The thing I disliked the most was the corrals. The organization listed corral times on bibs; but it really did not matter. No one was there to check people into corrals and it took 2 miles to get around people that were in the wrong corral. There were limited spectators. The problem with an early spring marathon is dodging all the potholes on the poor maintain streets of DC but not the marathons part. The expo was pretty lame and took 10 minutes to go through. I will not be running it again and will just stick with another fall marathon.
3.0

By: Carl F.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Half-Marathon Masquerading As Full Marathon

This marathon means well, but it needs to decide whether it is a half-marathon or a full marathon. In 2010, the two did not peacefully co-exist. The race is clearly geared toward the half, with multiple water stops (including the first stop about 1 mile into the race causing a serious back up) and sporadic music. Once the marathoners peeled off from the 6,000 half-marathoners, things changed. After the 19 mile mark, the course became fairly ugly and the water stops fairly sparse. Runners looking for encouragement from any type of crowd, or a boost from some music (ANY type), must have been disappointed. Although the start had tremendous energy and the PA announcer kept the runners informed, the 'corrals' were a disaster. Most runners summarily disregarded the signs and jammed the front, resulting in a traffic jam more akin to the Beltway than a road race. On the positive side, all the volunteers as well as the police conducting traffic control were exceptionally nice. The expo was enjoyable, and bag check was smooth both before and after the race. There were plenty of portable toilets, and the post race food was plentiful. Having the Metro open early to accomodate the runners is a real positive, as well as the ability to hang out in the Armory before the start. Overall, a good but not great experience.
3.0

By: Greg N.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Needs Some Improvements

I live in DC and while it was nice to sleep in my own bed before a marathon, I was slightly disappointed with the race. The organizers need to add the ability to track runners during the race. This seems standard in many other races; especially if you have a relay option, which they did. The half marathon course was good; but the 17 to 24 mile portion was unimpressive. Also, there were 2 180 degree turns on the course, with a whole city and 26.2 miles can't these be avoided? While it hurt I was glad to see the hills in the final 2 miles. I agree with the comments about the start. I know there are always runners creeping toward the front (I don't know why), but this seemed worse than usual, if you are going to demand 'qualifying' races, than try some enforcement of starting positions. I do all my training alone so don't mind if there are spectators or not, but for people who want the boost from cheering crowds, this is not the marathon for you.
3.0

By: James P.

Posted: March 22, 2010

An Underachieving, mediocre marathon that could be

This is a half-marathon event. Period. There is a marathon attached to it that nobody seems to care about and that's too bad given the geographic layout of the nation's capital. The first 13 miles offer interesting scenery, moderately challenging terrain, and decent crowd support. But once you run past RFK Stadium for the second time and retread miles 1-3, you might wish you had just shut things down and headed to the food tent. Miles 18- 25 are boring and uninspiring as you make your way toward south and southeast DC. You run along the Anacostia River toward Minnesota Ave. The environment has an industrial feel. There are a few long straight-aways and out and back type stretches which forewarn you of the dreary landscape ahead. Perhaps course designers can explain why the race doesn't head west on Mass Ave toward the Potomac and Georgetown or venture a bit farther north past Columbia Heights. A few scattered spectators ringing cowbells was about all the fan support you got. I expected this type of non-stimuli when I ran Charlottesville, but not in DC. If you need a lot of energy and excitement to carry you through, think twice about this marathon. To conclude, the Expo was good. The guest speaker series was informative. The bag check/bag retrieval process went smoothly. The water stops were plentiful but a bit chaotic and congested, especially in the beginning. I've enjoyed better, more tasty post-race snacks but that would be the least of my concerns. Stayed with friends so I can't comment on lodging but the DC Metro was very convenient. It is more hillier than many expect so make note, and beware of potholes! Overall, an average marathon at best with much room for improvement. If you don't live relatively close, like me, skip it.
2.0

By: Cathy R.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Fantastic support from spectators, volunteers.

This was my first marathon and I couldn't have asked for better weather or a better location; it was easily accessible by metro, and we got great encouragement from other runners - especially in the last 6 miles.
5.0

By: Nick W.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Suntrust National Marthon is well worth running!

I just got home from travelling to run the full marathon at the Suntrust National Marathon in Washington D.C. I had a fantastic experience and really enjoyed myself. I also managed to set a new PR and I was really thrilled with the entire experience. Below are a few thoughts on the race: Hits: -beautifull course that stretches through the historic bits of DC and past all sorts of monuments and historic sections of town. The front half is much more scenic. The back half is less so but I was so focused on the race at that point that I didn't really notice the surroundings much. -The course is great. A challenging but enjoyable first half, and the back half wasn't too bad, but the rolling hills in miles 23-26 were quite challenging! But to me that made it all the better! -The organization was top notch. I only had a few issues which I'll list in the misses section. I knew where I was supposed to be and when at all times. Communication was top notch via email, and once I got to town the process to get my number and other items was easy. -Medals are nice quality and the finish line festival was nice too. -The pace teams were GREAT!!! We had three pacers in the 3:40 group and they were great fun, motivating, and really helped make the miles go by. I had a great time hanging out with the 3:40 gang! I also loved not having to pay attention to pacing. Just following the pacers made that aspect of my race plan simple! -The temps at the end were around 67 degrees which was really hot when you've been training through the winter. The fact that there were aid stations every mile after mile 20 was AWESOME. I dumped lots of water over my head to stay cool! Misses: -there was one water station right before a sharp corner somewhere around mile 8 or 9. It led to quite a bottleneck of runners, drinkers, and people slowing to round the corner. that stop should be moved to avoid that. -better communication about pacing and where you should start should be done to avoid the fact that there were TONS of slower runners in front of me despite the fact I was lined up in the 8:20/mile pace corral. I had to fight my way through the crowd for the first three miles which was a big waste of energy early in the race. I know this is really out of the race organizers control, but I thought it could at least be mentioned a lot more over the sound system before the start. Larger and more signs with pacing on them would also help. -I never heard the gun go off. I just heard loud music the whole time. There should be a countdown over the PA so we know EXACTLY when the gun goes off. The music was way too loud at that moment to hear it. I really had a great time at the marathon and I would recommend it to other runners without hesitation. Be sure and get in a run at sunrise or dusk on the mall before the race if you can. Its GORGEOUS at that time! Congrats to a great job by all the organizers and thanks so much to all the volunteers! Your efforts were much appreciated!
4.0

By: Barry Lowenthal

Posted: March 22, 2010

Nice race on a good, city course

I work in and around DC, and used to live in the city. This was a really well-done race - the course gave a good tour of the city (and not just the monuments - though running by the mall was nice - but also the neighborhoods). Similar in many ways to Chicago. The expo is small, but well attended by the local running community. Parking to get to the expo was the usual hassle. Race day organization was really well done. Metro to the start (and finish) is the way to go - no issue at all. Indoor bathrooms (though crowded) and LOTS of porta-pots for those of us with last-minute nerves. The race itself begins with the half and full marathoners together - not a bad way to run, since the race isn't too big (I think around 10,000 half runners and 3,500 full). We ran by the capitol, then the National Mall, and then up through some of the neighborhoods in Northwest Washington. Not a ton of crowd support. My biggest complaint about the course is that the full group continues with the half runners until just before the finish for the half - then loops through some parking lots at RFK Stadium. I would suggest peeling off from the half marathoners much earlier - perhaps at approximately mile 9 or 10. The post-race finishing party was OK, but they had free beer (no limits!) for runners - VERY NICE! But there were not a lot of food choices, and we had a long walk until the first water bottle was handed off - I would move the water to before the medal. All in all, a good race, and one that I'll consider running again.
3.0

By: Julia B.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Marathon very good for D.C.

This is the third year in a row that I have run the full marathon. The lines for the bib pick-up at the Armory were a disappointment, long and confusing, and the pot holes were pretty bad in areas (okay, it was an extremely bad winter but with a running Mayor ... and where was he this year?). That said, it is an impressive undertaking, having this marathon in D.C., particularly this year. The coordination needed between what must be a least three law agencies (Capitol Hill police, D.C. police and the National Park Service police for Anacostia Park) must be formidable. And what a day!: the Hill in session, organized protests (some quite ugly), and the start of major tourist season. As a local, I was touched by the number of residents who came out to cheer and the support of the police who handle the flow of pedestrians and impatient drivers extremely well. Very little unites us in this unique town and the marathon is a very good thing for the area. Now, if the race directors could get the Washington Post to really cover it ...
4.0

By: April M.

Posted: March 22, 2010

1st half-marathon was GREAT (few improvements?)!

This was my first time running a half-marathon. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed it! My only suggestion for improvement would be for the rest stops (I know with so many people it is hard to man the stops). However, at the second drink stop, they had already run out of PowerAde. I was unable to get a GU until mile 11. Each stop before was out of it. It wouldn't have bothered me so much except that this was my first race, and I didn't realize it would be gone so fast. If I had had a heads up about it, I would have carried some on the course with me. Those are my only negative thoughts; other than that, it was an AWESOME route and race!
4.0

By: Si F.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Worth traveling to? Yes!!

I agree with prior remarks regarding the water stops. Very poor that I had to wait for someone to splash some water in my cup. More volunteers needed at the stops during the first half. Once the field dispersed, the water stops were fine for the second half of the marathon. Nice course, loved running the Mall and the tunnels. Loved the rolling hills. Loved the beer stop at mile 6! Thanks to the spectators! I do remember thinking it was very depressing to peel off from the half marathon and be directed behind the stadium onto a service road pockmarked with potholes and grass growing up from the pavement, the road was wet and muddy in places and the scenery was not yet melted snow dumped there from the parking lots. A smaller field of runners around me made me feel completely hopeless for almost 2 miles, then you ran Capitol Hill and the mall again so that helped spark a second wind. Nice expo, nice t-shirt I can actually wear, good choc. chip cookies at the finish, nice heavy medal, accurate and enthusiastic pace groups. Easy Metro transportation to the race. Definitely a destination race, the city is awesome!
4.0

By: Anita D.

Posted: March 22, 2010

Parking took forever...

First, the downsides. The parking situation was terrible. Since the start and finish is at RFK, one would think they are used to seeing much larger crowds. It took us over an hour to park. Absolutely unacceptable. I have never seen such disaster and that includes much, much larger events. I agree with other runners that water stops were crowded, but volunteers were great. Finish line was a mess. Hard to find anything and the lines were awful. Also, it is not a bad idea to separate runners from other people and have no re-entry rules; this way people who just finished the race can get their water relatively quickly. Positives. Flat course with only a few rolling hills. We had a very nice day, although it did get hot pretty quickly. I was thinking that a sprinkler, at least at the finish line would have been a welcome addition. Or maybe at least some cold sponges. I don't know, something to cool you down. Traffic control was great. Crowd support was fine as well.
3.0

By: Andy R.

Posted: March 21, 2010

excellent spring marathon with a great course

This was my DC area marathon and I thoroughly enjoyed it. The Expo was nice, not huge like Chicago, but with lots of vendors. The Metro opened early making transportation to the Start very easy. The course was well-marked and took in most of the tourist sites you go to see when in DC. I thought the water stops were plentiful and I never had to wait for fluids. The post-race spread had good food, plenty of drinks, but the space was a bit crowded. There did seem to be lots of room that they could have expanded into. My only complaints were the majority of the roads were in horrible condition, causing the runners to dodge potholes and run on a cambered surface for a lot of miles. The water stops were confusing in that the water and Powerade were not at different tables. I like it when water is at the first table and the Gatorade is at the next. That leads to less congestion if you know to go to the last tables to get your drink. These are minor problems, though. The water stops is an easy fix, and the potholes is easy, too, since nobody is going to fix them Overall, I thought it was an excellent race, in a great city. The fantastic weather helped too. I would highly recommend this race to anyone looking for a mid-size spring race, that is relatively flat, easy to travel to, and has all the amenities of a bigger race.
4.0

By: Brent N.

Posted: March 21, 2010

Decent course and spectators

This was my first marathon and first race in DC. Overall, nice race. The course is overall pretty good - the half is 100% good, but the 2nd half of the marathon course can get somewhat dismal, especially miles 17-21. The weather was unfortunate - a freakishly hot weekend, and miles 18 - 24 had no shade, just a hot sun remorselessly baking runners and heating the ashpalt to temps in the 80s. If you are running on a warm sunny day, take this into account and pace yourself accordingly. If we could trade the Anacostia part for a tour of Georgetown, that would be great. If you are driving to the race, traffic around RFK is miserable. I hit RFK just before 6:00 am and by the time I had parked, I had barely enough time to jog to the starting line. You need to get there earlier than you think. Metro might be the best way to go. The start was a bit of a mess - the corrals were not marked, and the pace teams had these tiny signs about the size of an index card. Tough to find. The water stops were a mess. Drinking on the run? No way. You had to stop and wait. Some stations ran out of cups and people were just taking swigs out of a gallon jug. The cups were slighly bigger than dixie cups - maybe an ounce or two of water. Because of the weather, I think people may have been bonking early because they were getting dehydrated. The tables need to be farther apart and better staffed. The crowd was great from Dupont Circle to Union Station. On the 2nd half, spectators are sparse, except for a part of Anacostia, and on Minnesota Avenue. It is actually a bit of a shock making the turn around RFK stadium, and all of a sudden hearing and seeing a huge crowd of people. Overall, a good race. I'm sure if the weather had cooperated, I would have enjoyed it more.
4.0

By: Gary Steinberg

Posted: March 21, 2010

Great half-marathon! Awe-inspiring!!!

Okay, first things first. It didn't hurt that the weather was absolutely PERFECT! No way it was under 50 degrees to start. For 2011 be mindful that this is NOT normal for D.C. I have no major complaints about the start. Yes, the signs were poor. There were no corral numbers. But there were signs with pace times which worked just fine. And even though there were a lot of people, there was no congestion at the start and we all got a running start. The course was phenomenal. It was much hillier than I thought from the topo map on the web site (which was very wrong according to my Garmin-underestimated the grades), but the hills made it challenging and diverse. The sites were spectacular. Washington is a beautiful city and experience. The hill at the finish line sucks but that's life I guess. The after race refreshments were fine (water, fruit, cookies, pretzels, etc.). Of course, there were no gels until Mile 11 for me (I'm a middle of the packer meaning 1/2 the runners got none). That sucked but was expected. The best part is hanging out in D.C. afterwards and seeing the sights and enjoying the history of our nation's capital. Will definitely do it again!
5.0

By: Laura E.

Posted: March 20, 2010

Great run through DC!

I travel throughout the US to run both half and full marathons (ran the half today), and this was one of my favorites! Beautiful course - I loved running along Constitution Ave., through Howard U., and just taking in the quaint, historic neighborhoods. There are several rolling hills, but they aren't bad - I actually enjoyed the variety (and the long gradual downhills!). But the uphill so close to the finish was not ideal. :) Perfect size for a race (about 9,000 between the full and half) - I always had plenty of people around me, but they were not overwhelmingly huge, like at some of the major events. The people running the race and the spectators were genuinely nice and full of enthusiasm. Weather was perfect - in the 40s at the start - though it did warm up quite a bit by the end. Metro transportation opens early on race day - super easy, cheap, and convenient. I recommend it! My only real complaint would be the organization of the water stops. They only had 2-3 tables of water at each stop, right at the beginning of the line, which led to a LOT of congestion. At a few, I had to actually come to a complete stop just to make my way to the table and/or wait for them to pour more water! I'd recommend spreading water out, or having additional tables after the PowerAde so that some traffic could keep moving. I also heard some other runners complaining that they had run out of GU at mile 5; I expect this sometimes at the 20-mile mark of the marathon, but at mile 5, the pack is still generally pretty close together, so runners going at a slower pace aren't so far behind that they should shouldn't get one at this point. Expo was okay. Fans for the first few miles were sparse, but we are all still waking up at that point anyway. :) After about mile 4-5, fan support was pretty constant and very encouraging. Overall, a great event! For those in the DC area (or elsewhere) looking for a good-sized spring race, I definitely encourage you to consider National!
4.0

By: Sara Z.

Posted: March 20, 2010

Becoming Too Big, Too Soon

I've run the half two years in a row. I had a terrific experience last year and recall thinking at the time that the organization was very good, particularly for such a new race. My impression this year was that the size of the field has grown significantly from last year and that the organization has failed to keep pace. Having said that, the event had lots of positives, and I hope the organization straightens out as time goes by because the race has a lot of potential. First, the positives. I love having a DC marathon that - unlike Marine Corps - is run entirely within the District. And it's particularly nice to have a course that, rather than sticking to the Mall and areas downtown, goes through a diverse set of neighborhoods all across town. My only complaint about the course is that the condition of H Street NE is very poor, although that will change within the next year or two as it gets repaved. Likewise, the condition of the road in RFK where the race finishes is very poor - potholes and very uneven pavement that's not really acceptable for the finish. Also great was the crowd support. It's grown from last year and, while sparse in some places, was terrific overall - particularly for such a recent race. (I can only speak for the first 13.1, though.) Now the downsides. The start was far too crowded and, overall, was a mess. The corrals were in a different location from last year and much narrower, and the signs indicating paces were relatively inconspicuous and largely ignored. Thus, for the first 3 miles or so, runners like me who were running at an 8:23 pace and started in the proper corral for that pace were running around and between huge crowds of much slower runners who decided to start in the 8:00 and 7:30 corrals. I've run enough large races to know this always happens to a certain extent, but it was much worse here than any other marathon or half I've run in recent years (including races with a much larger field). Also related to the start: pace groups were extremely difficult to find, for those who wanted to run with them. The finish was likewise way too crowded. As soon as you exited the chute you were stopped by a long line into a tent with water and food. The tent was narrow and crowded and the line was really long; it took forever to get water. The RFK complex is huge, and there has to be a way they can take advantage of all that space and set up a more open finish area so runners don't back up into long lines just to get water. Finally, water stops were WAY understaffed. The volunteers who were there were hardworking and friendly, but there were far too few of them. With at most two exceptions, I had to wait for water to be poured for me at each water stop - or to grab my own cup from the table. That's just not acceptable. There should be enough water poured in advance and enough volunteers to hand it to you. Bottom line: the race is a mixed bag with a lot of potential, if only the organization can keep pace with the growth of the field.
3.0

By: Michael W.

Posted: October 22, 2009

For me this was a great experience

I loved this race. The route was my favorite of the four races I've now run. You have to really appreciate the logistics of shutting down the streets of one of the world's preeminent cities. The course took us through all parts of the city and wasn't shy about putting the good with the ugly (parts of the city that is). And for this participant, that honesty was appreciated. I loved the half/full split-up and found the support to be gracious and endearing. Running a marathon and looking over your shoulder and seeing the White House, Capitol Building and Washington Monument makes for priceless moments. D.C. was not only a great place to visit, but also a great place to run.
5.0

By: Mona C.

Posted: October 05, 2009

Not the best race around...

I have run several half-marathons and this was my least favorite - not only because it was dark and cold at the start, but because of the lack of organization. I decided not to carry my fuel belt because I figured that the Suntrust race was so large and they would have plenty of fluids along the route. I ran by several empty tables... there was not even a volunteer around to tell you anything. Then other tables only had gallon jugs to share?!?! I had to actually break down and share bottles with hundreds of other people so that I could stay somewhat hydrated. Gel table? Empty. It almost felt like the race was over and I was in a ghost town, yet there were several hundred people still behind me.
3.0

By: Bill Scargill

Posted: September 03, 2009

Great course, lots to see in DC

I had a great time, in spite of my slow finish of 4:50. But running slow has its advantages, as there is plenty to see. You get a real feel for DC that you do not get in the Marine Corps Marathon. Photos were great, especially the one they take of you with the US capitol in the background. Taking the metro to the start is the way to go, as I stayed in Bethesda.
4.0

By: peter f.

Posted: July 06, 2009

mainly flat, with nice scenery

I set a PR of 3:28, which was 20 minutes better than my previous best. I liked the course, although the rolling hills at miles 23-24 were a bit tough. It was my 5th marathon, and I would rate it as my favorite.
4.0

By: Ashley S.

Posted: July 02, 2009

Convenient and fun for local runners

I have done the Suntrust National for the past 2 years (2008 full; 2009 half).The 2008 edition was my first marathon, and I had a great time. There was plenty of parking when I picked up my packet at the start/finish the night before, but the Metro stops so close to the start/finish that I took it instead the morning of the race. Since the race is around the first day of spring and at 7 a.m., the start is very cold. However, I think this is just fine for distance running. I enjoyed the 1st half - monuments, spectators, fellow runners. The 2nd half lacked most of these things, although I enjoyed seeing the new Nationals' stadium. One big disappointment in 2009: No band near Howard University. I was really looking forward to it!
4.0

By: Deborah W.

Posted: June 29, 2009

So proud to be an American at this run

This was a destination run for me, and it takes place near my birthday. I loved it!! I loved the practice runs my husband and I did the days before (I ran by all the monuments). The weather was so nice and cool. The course was ok, as I would not know how to improve it. But watch out for potholes and uneven streets. We stayed at the hostel (close by and with reasonable rates). The organization was great. Lots of email contacts about the event. Highly recommend this one.
5.0

By: Terri S.

Posted: May 31, 2009

Better for faster runners

Let me preface this by saying that I love the fact that Washington, D.C. now has a full marathon run entirely within city limits. This is a relatively new marathon, and it's still a work in progress. Overall, I really liked the course because it takes you through the "real D.C.," including Adams Morgan, and waterfront along Southeast that I've never seen before, in addition to the capitol and monument areas that you see in most D.C. downtown races. The weather this year was fabulous - somewhat cold starting out, but I prefer cold weather for distance running. This much said, I would not recommend this marathon as a first marathon for slower runners (like myself). After the half-marathoners peeled off, I was running largely by myself. I suspected that would be the case, since I hadn't seen a lot of full marathon racing bibs around me in the first half. The second half was single-file for people like me, who were running 11:30 or more/mile (I finished in 5:33 - about my goal for a first marathon, but it was lonely in the back). At one point, I was going through a tunnel and hadn't seen anyone in the race for at least a mile when a plaintive female voice called out from behind, "I hope you know where you're going because I've been following you for the past hour." That picked me up for a few miles - at least I then knew I was still in the race! The police support and presence were awesome. I'm a small female, and never felt threatened in the least at any point on the race course, which goes through some marginal neighborhoods. The race organizers have some kinks to work through, the most serious being a shortage of cups for slower runners, especially on the first half. I was pretty amazed to hear volunteers yelling, "Jug water only" at the aid stations. I was very grateful that I had brought my own fuel belt. Otherwise, I'm not sure that I would have finished. So in sum, I'd consider doing this marathon again, but only if my times improve. For runners closer to the 4:00 mark, I think this could be a great race. For back-of-the-packers, like me, you can't count of any adrenaline boost from the runners around you (or the sparse crowds). If you're OK running alone, go for it. Otherwise, stick with the half.
3.0

By: Julie A.

Posted: May 18, 2009

you could skip it

I ran this race slowly to help a friend finish her first marathon. The course could go through MUCH better parts of DC, and it doesn't (it goes through some pretty bad parts, actually). At three water stations in a row they had no cups. Spectators are sparse for a metropolitan area. You can't get a hotel close to the start/finish because it's in a bad area. The hills made it challenging, although they're killer at the end. Would definitely not run this again.
2.0

By: Bob Z.

Posted: April 13, 2009

Ok but not great

This is my 7th marathon. It was dark at the start and very cold (I know that the organizers can't do anything about the weather). The course was hillier than expected. The hills over the last 3 miles were brutal due to the fatigue. The food at the end was very limited; they had whole oranges (not cut) and soft pretzels. The port-a-pots at the end of the marathon did not have any toilet paper. The half-marathoners must have used it all. Bag-check was not staffed properly, and people were just throwing bags into a huge pile. My other marathon experiences were much better.
2.0

By: Doug S.

Posted: April 09, 2009

Pleasant, sparse second half

I ran earlier in the week with a group, and some of my friends were talking about doing the Suntrust Half this weekend. I wasn't planning anything, so I went home and looked online, and the race site said there were still slots available for the full marathon. I had off work the Friday before and, living locally, I took the Metro down in the morning and, sure enough, they were happy to take my late registration fee of $110. Not an impressive expo, but I don't need any more junk anyway. I was glad the Metro was open at 5 a.m. race day (Saturday), so I didn't have to deal with driving into DC. The thermometer in the car said it was somewhere in the upper 20's, brrrr! Got to the race area via Metro about 5:40 a.m. and looked for some of my friends. I never did find them in the pre-dawn darkness (it turns out they went into the DC Armory across the street to keep warm). I kept piddling around until the last minute to see if I could find them. I also didn't want to take off my warm coat and hat yet. It was still pretty dark at gun time of 7 a.m. I saw one of the local Marathon Maniacs runners who I also see at other ultras/marathons. She was running the full today and Shamrock Full tomorrow! She said she had done 19 marathons so far this year. Wow. Do the math. (She's training for some 100-miler now). The sun didn't come over the office buildings in this later winter DC weather until an hour or more into the race. It sure felt good to get the temps above the mid 30's. I made one pit stop at mile 9 to water a fence. The front half of the race was a bit crowded for me, but there's nothing like running some of those same streets on Cherry Blossom, Army or Marine Corps. At the half split off, I was reminded of a similar strategy at Philadelphia Marathon, where the full runners go off a different direction. A good idea. We were immediately cut down to what initially looked like hundreds of runners, rather than thousands. I really liked the fewer runners, but then I'm not big on needing crowd support. Tons of police at every intersection. In one area near the Annacostia waterfront, there were about 30 police officers near a shady housing project. I totally felt safe the entire race, even if that part of the course could be deemed the crack-house tours. The back half of the course was very flat and fast. I ran on and off with a friend I recognized, but his quads were tightening around mile 24, so I went ahead. I felt great, ran the entire race and never had to walk. I just wished I could have beat 4 hours, but it wasn't in the cards today. This would be a good event for anyone trying to PR. I may do it again, especially if my friends do the full distance rather than the half.
4.0

By: David Trevino

Posted: April 08, 2009

One of my favorities

Since its inception, I have run the National Marathon three times and the half once. This event will always be on my schedule to run, and I believe it is only getting better and better. For the size of the field, the expo and spectators are more than appropriate. Running in DC is also such a pleasure because of all of the sights one can see running through the District (i.e., Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial, The U.S. Capitol, just to name a few). Plus, this is our nation's capital. For any runner who has not had the pleasure and/or privilege, to run the National Marathon, I strongly recommend that you put this on your race calendar for 2010 and beyond. You will not be disappointed.
5.0

By: Jeff I.

Posted: April 06, 2009

Great race on a great day.

I ran this for my 10th marathon and it couldn't have gone better. I thought the expo was decent (my 6-year-old had an awesome time getting swag from all the different booths), but I don't really care so much about expos and that sort of stuff. The course was great as far as having a good mix of neighborhoods, as well as flat ground and *relatively* easy hills (if you train with hills, these should seem fairly minimal - just enough to enjoy the change when they come around). The best part is mostly luck, but the weather was outstanding: Cool temps, sunny, no wind! There is plenty of parking, and the metro availability is great. The race is a good size, as you never really feel crowded, but you're never alone either. The 3:20 pace group was right on (unlike some other pace groups I've run with in the past) and a good group of people too, and I was able to kick the last 1.5 - 2 miles for a sub-3:20 PR. I realize I have a bias due to the PR, but I highly recommend this marathon. I ran well, had a lot of fun, and had an overall excellent experience.
4.0

By: Vanessa Taylor

Posted: April 02, 2009

Overall thrilled - good race for a first marathon

This was my first marathon, and I would definitely recommend it to other first-timers. Pros: -Well organized, received many of e-mails with updates about race day and the expo -Volunteers were spectacular and helpful -Course was beautiful -Lots of fans outside for the most part (except between miles 22-24, when we probably needed them the most) -Great finish festival Cons -Very early start (7 a.m.) -The out-and-back route at mile 22 was difficult in the sense that it was not at a place where your family could really be, and that was when I needed support) My goal was to break 4 hours. I finished at 3:52, and was incredibly happy. I did not expect to finish in that time - I was shocked. It was an absolutely wonderful day, and one of the best days of my life, actually. I met a lot of great people along the way, and the community (both the runners and spectators) was fantastic. While this is a relatively young marathon, it is going to grow into something great in the years to come.
4.0

By: Mark W.

Posted: April 01, 2009

Shirt could be improved

Please ditch the 26.2-mile finisher logo on the back. It sounds like it's a struggle to finish and the person wearing the shirt barely made it. Also, you give the shirts out in advance of the race; I guess you're assuming everybody who got a shirt finished. It's just a little hokey!! Otherwise, it's an OK race.
4.0

By: John W.

Posted: March 30, 2009

Fun, rolling course

The Good: I ran the marathon. Running in D.C. was great! The course is well planned, especially for the halfers with most of the monuments and landmarks in the first half. Running outside the city was great and gave the race more of a personal feel. Most of the spectators in the second half just stepped out of their front door to watch the event. The volunteers were great and the aid stations were well stocked. I ran a 3:29 and I hear that some of the stations ran out of supplies toward the end. The expo was well designed and flowed well. Bart Yasso was on hand for a book signing and to pass on some of his wisdom. The armory was open before the race - a great way to keep warm - and we started with the sunrise. The Metro opened opened early and was right next to the start, so it made morning logistics a breeze. The Bad: I trained for six months for this event with a 3:30 goal. I was very upset to see that there was every other pace group except a 3:30. There was a 20-minute gap in pace groups. Also, there were no toilets until about mile 7. Overall, a very nice event. If you're trying to run 50 states, I would recommend this one.
4.0

By: Mike Patenaude

Posted: March 29, 2009

Great scenery

This was a nice track. There are two little back-and-forths that are annoying, but besides that, it's great. The view is awesome, and the volunteers are great. At mile 25, a police officer told me, "Come on, man, you can finish." It kept me going.... Thanks. There is water at almost every mile, which is key. The only disappointment was the lack of fans; however, the fans that were present were awesome. There are a few hills near the end, so beware. This was my first marathon and I would recommend it to everyone. For a young event, it is very mature! I will be there next year and attempt to beat my 3:33:15 time.
4.0

By: kevin n.

Posted: March 27, 2009

Overall, a great race

This was my third marathon, and overall, I would rate it a great race. The course is quite nice, taking you by the capitol, White House and museums. Then you run through neighborhoods and the waterfront. Hills were no problem; they are not big or steep, so you can handle them. Police and volunteers were great, and start/finish location next to the metro is wonderful. I also liked the last mile, running back to the stadium - which made me feel like I was in the Olympics (fat chance). Because you could see the stadium, you knew that you could push to the end. My only complaint is about the lack of cups for water. There were not many spectators, but that did not bother me at all. The weather was a perfect 38 at the start, and high 40's at the end.
4.0

By: Missy S.

Posted: March 27, 2009

Great marathon for everyone!

This marathon was everything I was hoping it would be. The weather was beautiful, the course was great (with lots of hills but nothing huge), and it was very well organized. This was my first real "destination" marathon and I am very glad that I came.
5.0

By: Kelly D.

Posted: March 26, 2009

National Marathon Experience

Overall, I was satisfied with the marathon because I qualified for Boston. This was my third marathon and I ran National in 2007 as my first one. The course was improved and it was nice to go into the neighborhoods, see the monuments and pass the waterfront. The spectators were better and I had enough water and PowerAde on the course. I also would like to thank the 3:45 Navy pace team for volunteering their time. They were fun to run with and I actually finished with them in 3:44:46, which was better than expected. A few suggestions for next year: Please get rid of the route where we cross the grid bridge at mile 19. Not only is it dangerous but it is very painful for the feet. Also, the porta-potties at the starting line smelled awful. I also suggest starting and finishing at another area in DC. The finish line was a bit off and I ended my marathon on a low note because I was confused with my time.
4.0

By: Andy O.

Posted: March 26, 2009

not bad, not great

Only my 2nd marathon, so I don't have a lot to compare to, and my other marathon (MCM) probably isn't the best to compare against, but here's what I thought: PROS: 1. smaller, more personal feel, with room to run 2. race started at 7:00, as the sun was rising 3. full-marathoners could dispose their excess clothing at the halfway point for later pickup (hopefully) 4. D.C. armory building opened up for pre-race shelter/warmth and restrooms. Ahh. 5. much better medals than MCM, and having them placed on you immediately (no backups) after the finish line felt good 6. a finish line volunteer helped me untie my shoes 7. good coverage/promotion by local NBC affiliate CONS: 1. boring 2nd half 2. lack of spectators, even in congested areas, but especially on the 2nd half 3. easily accessible; back gate to preferred parking lot didn't open until 5:00 (I like to get there "as early as I can," like the race directions said). Luckily, I had gotten lost the day before and knew a way to get to the parking lot. 4. RFK (race area) entrance under construction (ok, I'm being picky) 5. I guess others experienced a no-cups issue. I was fortunate to be ahead of that snafu. Good and bad. Would be nice if they ran through Georgetown, Rock Creek Park, etc. Skip Anacostia. Boring 'park' there. I know, hard to shutdown traffic all over, or in the most popular areas. I'll probably run it again though...
3.0

By: Ben Y.

Posted: March 26, 2009

A good race

Long story short, this is a good race. I'd recommend it. Course: I really liked this course. It gives you a real feel for the city. You run past the landmarks, through the nicer parts of town, and through some rougher parts. But, you'll have that with almost any major city. If you only want to see DC's highlights, then run Marine Corps. If you want to run through the real DC, run National. And please disregard the individual below who made the Baghdad statement. In my opinion, that analogy is as inaccurate as it is inappropriate. Let's be clear. At no point on the course will you feel unsafe! Organization: There were a couple of issues here. I think this is due to the recent growth of this race. I ran the half last year and there were about 4,000 total registrants (half and full). This year they had nearly twice as many registrants. I think many of the issues (i.e. running out of GU, I passed a couple of aid stations that had run out of cups, etc.) probably stemmed from not scaling things up enough from the previous year. I do hope they recognize the issues and make adjustments. As an aside, I would like to point out that races that offer a GU stop before the half and full marathons split off from one another usually have that GU stop run out very quickly. The fact is that halfers will run more quickly than you (as expected) and many of them don't know that you really don't need GU to cover 13.1. I carried my own GU for the first half and didn't have any trouble with any of the stops after the half turnoff. Fans/Volunteers: These guys are great. Lots of enthusiasm in many of the neighborhoods. Yes, there were spots on the course without fan support, but then you'll have that. Personally though, I think that's a good thing. Would you really want to hear people screaming and cheering for 26.2 miles straight? Miscellanea: Weather- Perfect: 30 at the start (bit chilly), 45 and sunny at the finish. End of March is a good time of year to have this race. Medal- Good. Improved from last year. More interesting design. Tasteful coloring. Swag- Pretty much just a tech shirt. Not bad looking. Shirts for the half are kind of an ugly orange but the full is a nice, dark blue. They could stand to put fewer ads on the back, but it'll make a good running shirt. Transportation- I took the Metro this year. It opens a couple of hours early for race day. Certainly an easy way to go. The Stadium/Armory stop is about 75 yards from the start line. I drove last year and remember that parking isn't bad. They use the stadium parking lots, so there's lots of capacity. Of course, driving in DC is kind of a pain in general. I'd recommend Metro.
5.0

By: jeff k.

Posted: March 25, 2009

Room for improvement

The National Marathon was well worth doing, especially in a great destination town like D.C. The race could use improving, and I'm sure it will do so. This one has great potential. Bag check was pretty tough. Some water stops ran out of cups and offered sips from jugs! The roads in D.C. are surprisingly bad. I stepped into a pothole and several speed bumps. The T-shirt and medal are excellent. The volunteers were great.
2.0

By: Tammy Massie

Posted: March 24, 2009

Cute Course; Major Logistics Issues

I ran the inaugural marathon 4 years ago. This year, there was a vast improvement in the course! The 26.2 mile race explored and saw highlights from all 4 area's within DC. And unlike in 2007, through this journey we visited very few sections that were really seedy. BUT there were major problems. There were no water cups from mile 5-11, and it seems that there was limited beverages for those of us running a 2:30 half or 5-hour full pace. Furthermore, in my pace group (11 minutes/mile) there was no longer GU. At mile 18/19 I could see evidence of sports beans on the ground but there were NO packages left for the average runners. Considering the race limit was 5:30 (or 6 hours), there should have been beverages and food available for all runners on pace for this time limit.
4.0

By: Regina E.

Posted: March 24, 2009

Great logistics; low-budget marathon

I seemed to have had a different experience in the 2009 marathon from others. This was my 5th marathon in 2 years (I'm a slow runner and not competitive, so don't think my comments are from some elite athlete - just an everyday runner). There were a lot of good things about this race, and some needed areas of improvements. I would recommend the race, but take note: Great things: (+) Having it adjacent to the metro stop is wonderful. The neighborhood may not be that great, but with 10,000 people walking around, it's very safe. I walked off the metro at 6:45, and was ready to run the race at 7:00. Smooth sailing. No worries about traffic or, parking. (I didn't deal with the bag check.) (+) We were able to wait indoors if needed. (+) Awesome volunteers. Everyone at the water stops were great. I really liked all of the support during the last 4 miles. Police were great. The route was clearly marked for runners. (+) Different-colored cups for PowerAde and water. (+) The course was relatively interesting, especially running near the capital, etc. The course bills itself as a DC Marathon, so you run though all parts of the city - residential, urban, preserve. Don't expect a lot of monuments, and it is a "city" marathon. Areas to improve: (-) Add more toilets, especially for the half-marathon portion. (-) They ran out of cups towards the end of the half-marathon, but the last half of the full marathon was fully stocked. (-) They need to provide Kleenex and Vaseline at the water stops. I didn't see one box of Kleenex along the entire course (-) Move the ambulances or have them turn off their engines. Running by exhaust fumes was not fun. There was enough of that naturally from the city. (-) Very small expo. I think only two vendors were selling clothes. Two vendors were selling GU, etc. (-) There were speed bumps early in the course that were not clearly marked. I saw a couple of people fall because it was so dark and the speed bumps were gradual. It was sad. (-) Low-budget finisher medal. (-) The finisher T-shirt is branded with every sponsor's logo. It would be nice to have T-shirt without all of the ads. But it is a technical T-shirt, which is nice. (-) Inaccurate timers. The time on the clocks throughout the race was not accurate (according to my watch). And even the time shown on the finish line didn't match my watch, or even the printed time on the results page. I do wonder if it was timed accurately. (-) Horrible food and organization at the finish line. After crossing the finish line, one got their medal and chip removed, but then there were no directions to the food area, and no one was handing out water. When I did find the food tent, it wasn't staffed, and all that was offered was grocery store-quality bagels, bananas, and orange slices. There was also water and PowerAde. It was open to the public, so maybe that was why the food was so poor. But please, provide some sweets! I've had better food at half-marathons. (-) They need a better course map that can be zoomed in. It was really difficult to determine where the actual course was. My friends couldn't find it, given all of the overpasses and tunnels in DC. (-) There was a mediocre number of spectators, but they were very friendly. Few signs, though. (-) The course has some decent hills for the first part of the race, but the last three miles of uphill running are just evil. Granted, I did enjoy the very flat course from miles 14 - 23, but the steep uphill from miles 23 - 25, and then the gradual uphill from miles 25-26 were just mean. As I opened with, I liked this race, but could tell that they were constrained by the budget.
4.0

By: Tim M.

Posted: March 24, 2009

Great tune-up 1/2 maration for Boston

I ran the 1/2 as a tune-up for the Boston Marathon, 4 weeks later. Overall, a very good race. There's a good chance I'll run it again in the future as a Boston tune-up. High points: - Getting to wait/stretch/stay warm inside armory before the race. - Weather. As they said at the start, this was "no excuses" weather. Mid-high 30s, clear, and not windy. - 1/2 course. Great views of the mall, and NW Washington. The view of the capitol between miles 9-10 coming down N. Capital was spectacular. Hilly enough to be challenging, but not so much that it seriously impacted your pace. Some potholes/rough pavement, but only in a few sections. - Water/PowerAde stations. No problems from my perspective. - Start corral, at least for the 5:30-6:15 pace runners. It wasn't crowded at all up front. - Expo was efficient (although a pain to get to) and the Reebok tech shirt is good. - Post-race. Food/drink were good and plentiful. Results were posted very soon. Nice medal. Easy access to the metro. - Competitive field. Not-so-high points: - Bag check was a disorganized scrum. I got my bag back after the race though, so no harm done in the long run. - Porta-potty lines were a little long pre-race, but no worse than at any big race. - Few spectators (but the ones that were there were good, especially around miles 7-8).
4.0

By: John K.

Posted: March 24, 2009

Great course, logistically lacking

This was my third marathon, the first two being USMC and NYC. I was expecting this marathon to be an entirely different experience. It certainly was, but not all positive. First the positives: -Great course, with multiple views of the capitol and downtown mall. -Fan support in Anacostia was actually pretty good. -Police and volunteers were helpful and numerous, if not vociferous. -On the back half of the course, they took care of the marathoners pretty well (for the first half see below) -Free beer at the finish line, which I consumed liberally. -Decent shirt and medal. -I found a $40 pair of brooks Adrenalines at the expo (Adrenaline 7s, but who cares). Now, the negatives: -Very little fan support outside Anacostia and a few other small areas. I was expecting good fan support on the first half (where the 1/2ers were on the course), but there was very little, even there. -There was plenty of Gatorade, but the stands inexplicably ran out of cups (at least for those at my pace, 4:30). I had to drink out of 1-gallon jugs handed between runners, which created lines and backwash potential. Kudos to one of the volunteers, who actually bought extra cups for us from a store on the route. - The first GU station was out of GU. - Porta-pots were lacking, and I wasted quite a bit of time waiting to go. - The free stuff in the goody bag was not great for a $90 race. Not that this was all that important. All in all, a good course/race, but it needs to grow in publicity to get more spectators, and rid itself of the logistical problems that keep popping up.
3.0

By: Goatface G.

Posted: March 24, 2009

Good course, but the rest of race needs help...

I liked the course a lot and it had some very scenic stretches to it. Organization of the race was poor at best. Bag check was very disorganized, and I noticed at the start of the race that there were still a ton of people over at the bag check. And after the race, there was no organization as to how the bags were organized. It was a giant mess of people searching for their stuff. Aid stations were marked, but they should have been on both sides of the road for the first few miles given the congestion, as it was tough if you were on the wrong side of the road and had to cut over. Blue PowerAde; what were they thinking? It was somewhat comical to see everyone with the blue stains on their shirts but certainly not real funny if you ruined an expensive shirt, which I can guarantee that many people did. And I certainly don't run races for shirts, but a pink running shirt for a man? C'mon.... There are about 5-10 other things I could point out as well, but these reasons may seem picky, and I don't run races based on things like bag check or the color of the PowerAde. Still, this stuff is common sense, and it does distract from the total experience. I would recommend the race. I thought the course was challenging but fair - and scenic for an out-of-towner.
3.0

By: Puja T.

Posted: March 24, 2009

Overall great race

I ran the half. Liked: - The course was great - some hills, some monuments, some regular old neighborhoods with folks on porches. I'm local, and this was a great view of my city. - Expo wasn't overwhelming; volunteers were friendly and helpful. - Nice medal, which my boyfriend said looked like a beer bottle opener (sadly, it doesn't serve that purpose). Room for Improvement: - The port-a-potty lines on the first 6 miles were shockingly long. - I didn't stop at any water stations but noticed all kinds of crowds, lack of cups, lack of water (?), etc. Glad I didn't need to stop! - Crowd support was sparse, but that's not really a race responsibility. - The finish area was pretty narrow and I had to cut in front of some fast marathoners just to hit my stride. - I feel like I missed half of the mile markers, especially in the beginning (but, it was dark, so...). - Expo parking was a disaster, but that could have been exacerbated by the road construction around the armory. - Bag check drop-off was a mess, but post-race all bags were simply laid out on tables, which made retrieval a cinch. I set a PR in this race and will definitely run it next year.
3.0

By: mark p.

Posted: March 24, 2009

challenging but average

The course itself was just so-so, as we could have seen more of the icons of DC along the way. The last few miles had some tough hills. No plastic ties for the timing chip (they seemed to expect us to untie our laces and put it through the laces!); I have never seen this before! My GPS (and some others who finished near me) all read 26.65 miles, and my time seemed longer than I expected, so... all in all, there are better courses with better organization out there, not to mention better expos.
3.0

By: John F.

Posted: March 24, 2009

Excellent Tour of the Nation's Capital!!!

This was a well organized marathon. From the view at the back of the pack, the only problem was lack of water cups from 2nd/3rd station until you cleared the 13.1-mile mark. Then the problem cleared. Excellent traffic control/safety, very impressive finisher medal, and super metro system. I would strongly recommend this as a must-do marathon. Keep up the good work, DC!
5.0

By: David S.

Posted: March 24, 2009

Well-Run Race

My 2nd National Marathon and overall a positive experience. The changes to the course from 2008 made it even better and the support from the volunteers is terrific. A well-run race with a challenging course. One complaint I have pertains to my experience with the pace group. I was with the 3:40 group, which should have run 8:23 splits. At the half mark we were running 8:00 splits - way too fast. That burned out a lot of people from the group - no thanks to Nathan for that experience. Run the pace you advertise in the future or do not lead a group.
4.0

By: chuck m.

Posted: March 23, 2009

Loved the course

The course was wonderful and I would certainly run this again; however, I don't know what water stops the previous posters are talking about. More than half that I came by were out of cups. One volunteer even asked me for my cup back "as we are running low." The GU station at mile 7 was totally empty - not even a volunteer in sight when I got there. Admittedly I am not fast, but it was at mile 7 at about 1:06 into the race, so I'm surely not a back-of-the-packer either. As for the port-a-johns? I saw the first ones (4) at mile 5. That was it - I finally stopped at a construction site. I hate to complain because I loved the course, but it really needs some logistical help to make it competitive with others in an area that offers so many other choices.
4.0

By: Pete B.

Posted: March 23, 2009

D.C.'s "other marathon" has it all

Scenic! Capitol building, Washington Monument at sunrise - memorable. Two-loop marathon with enough variety to keep it "interesting" (some hills). Thanks for letting us stay warm in the armory. Thanks to all of the police and volunteers for keeping the course free of traffic. Nice expo too. First-class event; this race is on the way up. Weather was A+++.
5.0

By: Don Allen

Posted: March 23, 2009

Clear roads, great scenery; BEST big-city marathon

I loved the National Marathon! I have run 50+ marathons and this one was perfect: beautiful route, beautiful day, and great support at all of the aid stations. The only thing I would fault would be the baggage check trucks; the location didn't match where they said they would be in the online maps, and the baggage retrieval was difficult since they weren't laid out by bib number. However, the race itself was particularly memorable for the traffic-free route. I have run marathons in several major cities, and this was the first one where most of the roads had ALL lanes of traffic closed, which made for a more serene and less toxic run. And this wasn't because the race was confined to back-alleys and ghettos: this went right through the main parts of DC. I heard one runner complain that we didn't get very close to the sites during the run; but I don't see how you could get much closer to the Supreme Court building without a security badge! In addition to benefiting the runners, motorists enjoyed reduced traffic impediments since much of the route had overpasses that allowed traffic to progress without being stopped by runners. The early opening of METRO, the proximity to well-marked and staffed facilities, the beautiful weather, the clear streets, the monuments and lawns with many trees and flowers already in bloom, and the enthusiastic and helpful volunteers made this one of my all-time favorite marathons.
4.0

By: Katherine F.

Posted: March 23, 2009

Good for a first-timer!

This was my first marathon and I truly enjoyed the course. It was relatively flat, with some hilly sections during miles 6-8. I ran toward the back of the pack and they ran out of cups at several water stations during the first 13 miles, forcing runners without water to share the water jugs offered. They also ran out of GU gels at the first station. Luckily, I had my own water and gels! The spectators were good during the first half, but pretty sparse during long stretches of the second half. However, the volunteers at the water stops were wonderful and extremely encouraging. It was also nice to see police officers at every intersection. I would run this race again - I think there are some kinks to be worked out, but I loved the course and thought it was relatively well organized.
4.0

By: Dotty Maddock

Posted: March 23, 2009

A nice race, with some "growing pains"

Overall, I would recommend this marathon. Fortunately, we were able to stay with friends, so that really helped with the expense. EVERYTHING in D.C. is expensive! The metro was a great way to get to the race, and I appreciated it being open. You were crazy to try to drive and park with a transportation system like that. There was also construction around the Armory, so that really made traffic a mess. Packet pickup went smoothly, except for the security scanning. It was very inefficient and not set up to handle a race that had more than doubled in size. The same goes for the drop-off area before the race and aid stations on the course, where the volunteers just couldn't keep up with the crowds. And a suggestion would be to have the same set-up at every aid stop and different-colored cups for water versus sports drink. It was OK, but those are a few ways they could improve my rating of "Organization." But you'll have these "growing pains" when you increase that rapidly. The weather was VERY chilly (it was 36 degrees before the start and only 46 when I finished (around 11 a.m.). For me, that was GREAT running weather! I was surprised since it was the National Marathon that they didn't play the national anthem before the start (or did I miss it?). The first few miles were super (Constitution Ave.), then we ran through some nice areas, and then some not-so-nice areas. The "monument" part of the race probably only composed about 5 miles in total, so don't be expecting all monument views. But they were still impressive as long as they lasted! Then miles 18 to 23 were about as desolate as you can get. So just look forward to the excitement at the finish and get 'er done. The finish went smoothly, and the medal is nice. The food was a little meager (bagel, banana, cold unsalted pretzel). There was a beer area, but they corraled you in there and wouldn't let you leave that area with beer. I like to sip while I make my way out. All that said, I had a good finish time (for me) and felt great. So the combination of the weather, starting on time, the support, and the course worked for me. I wanted to include D.C. in my 50 states quest, so this fit the bill. I still want to come back for Marine Corps another year, but the lottery and the Virginia start and finish (versus truly D.C.) made it less appealing for me this year.
3.0

By: Mary Susan W.

Posted: March 23, 2009

Great Day in Washington D.C.

This was my first National Marathon and I enjoyed it overall. I didn't realized the course had so many rolling hills but my determination to PR pulled me through. I was told that the slower runners had no cups to drink from through miles 5 and to the 13 mile point. I just realized now that I placed 3rd in my age group and of course am very excited about that. All in all, for a fairly new race it was good. I especially liked the early opening of the subway - and having the armory open until 1:00 p.m. was just great for keeping warm on a brisk day.
3.0

By: Jarrett M.

Posted: March 23, 2009

Great course, but no cups and no GU

This was my third marathon, and overall it was a great experience. Parking was easy, there was no problem getting to the the starting line, the spectators were great, and, of course, the scenery can't be beat. BUT 3 of the aid stations prior to the half-way mark were out of cups before I got there, and the 7-mile GU station had no GU. Over 500 hundred people finished behind me so I'm sure I'm not alone in being upset at having to try to drink from one-gallon water bottles. Luckily, my running partner was smart enough to bring some Shot Bloks with him, which he shared with me. I can see no excuse for the organizers not providing sufficient supplies. This is a major safety issue. When you pay for a race, support is supposed to be part of the deal. It's not like the number of runners was a secret.
4.0

By: walter bullock

Posted: March 23, 2009

Spectacular event

Spectacular event. Kudos to the volunteers and spectators. Metro Police did a super job. This was my 40th marathon. This definitely rates high on my list. Lots of energy in D.C. Local politicians' enthusiasm for running was noteworthy. Beautiful medal. Impressive news conference. Would loved to have met Dominique at the expo. Running out of cups two hours into the event was unacceptable. Runners were forced to drink out of one-gallon water bottles. That was okay, but sharing containers with other runners was not cool. Barehanded volunteers passing one-gallon water bottles between sweaty-handed runners was not cool either. What if the temperature had been 20 or 30 degrees warmer? If it were a few degrees warmer, the water stops would have been disastrous. How soon we forget last year's Chicago Marathon. I'll be back in 2010 with water bottle in hand.
4.0

By: Trish W.

Posted: March 23, 2009

Fun race with easy logistics

This was my first local marathon, which made for easy logistics and a fun time. The parking was ample and close to the start/finish, so it was a breeze arriving and departing. I didn't mind running with the half-marathoners because it was nice (and distracting) to have so much company for the first half before having to settle down and concentrate for the second. One comment for the race organizers was that the majority of the water stops for the first half were out of cups by the time we back-of-the-packers rolled through. I always wear my fuel belt and figured there wouldn't be problems with cups for the second half (which was the case), but I did hear a lot of other runners not happy about the situation. Most of the course was good, but I was not crazy about the tunnels and the open-grid bridge we crossed. It was not as flat as I anticipated, but there was nothing that would require more than normal hill training prep work. Overall, it was pretty fun, and I'd definitely recommend this race for both newbies and experienced marathoners.
4.0

By: Drew Guthrie

Posted: March 23, 2009

A National Treasure

THE EVENT: This is an exceptionally well run, well-organized early spring marathon that should certainly grow in popularity in the coming years. For out-of-town participants, transportation to and from the start/expo is a snap via the DC Metro (from virtually any location in DC). THE COURSE: Make no mistake, this is not an easy marathon course, but neither is it impossible if you're looking for a BQ. The elevation chart is accurate and will give you a very good idea of what to expect. Aesthetically, it's great for about 18-19 miles. The federal buildings certainly glisten in the early morning light. The last 10K are not as inspiring or memorable, but the people and volunteers are great along the way! THE FOLKS: The volunteers at this race are simply outstanding and genuinely enthusiastic as are the spectators. They will certainly give you a lift along with your PowerAde. If you're looking for a memorable, first-class, challenging, yet hassle-free early spring marathon, definitely give the National a try.
5.0

By: Tom Stevens

Posted: March 23, 2009

Hard to beat the scenery for this one

Course is fantastic, with constant views of national landmarks, and just enough hills to make things interesting. Great crowd support; great volunteers. Also excellent was that they let us into the armory in the morning, so we didn't have to stand around freezing before the start. The Metro system is hard to beat, and is great for your cheering section since the course runs by so many stations. Areas to improve on: 1) Make the water stops longer. During the 1/2, walkers basically blocked any chance to pick up fluids. 2) Have some music. There was no on-course entertainment. They did allow headphones though. 3) Food at the end needs work. While oranges are nice, please cut them up. The Beer Tent was open to everyone though. I think it's great that the DC mayor runs this event, but maybe they could get some other celebs out in the crowd?
5.0

By: Pavel A.

Posted: March 23, 2009

Great potential, thoughtless course

After running the Philly Marathon a couple of times, I went to DC hoping for a route that would be at least as scenic and historic. Here's what I got: The Lows: - Metal detectors at the the expo - No winter gear, gels or nutrition bars at the expo - PowerAde (read: corn syrup) on the course. - Race starts and finishes at a parking lot!!! - Route goes through a long tunnel around mile 17 - Last mile is on the highway - At mile 19, route goes on a nasty bridge, forcing you to run on metal The Highs: - Nice first half of the route - Water station every mile after mile 20 - Spectators were few but nice The Verdict: I would not run it again, unless they change the route.
3.0

By: Yong-yi Z.

Posted: March 22, 2009

Amazing race - even for my first marathon

This was a great experience for my first marathon. The course was interesting throughout, taking me throughout parts of DC I had been to and many I had never seen. The volunteers were amazing, keeping us going during the entire race, especially towards the end. Every aid station was well set up. Special thanks for the guy with a "GIT-R DONE" sign, which helped me out when my leg cramped up. Overall, thanks, DC!
5.0

By: Dave L.

Posted: March 22, 2009

Great Overall Marathon

Awesome course. T-shirt was better than average. Medal was very good. Water stops were great. Port-o-potties were great. Fans were there for the first 13 miles; but there were few fans for the last 13 miles.
4.0

By: Brian B.

Posted: March 22, 2009

Overall Decent Marathon

The course was great! The starting line was quite congested. The bag check is in much needed improvement... long lines and no organization. The course itself made up for the start area logistics. I don't think it would take too much to make a few needed improvements.
4.0

By: Laura S.

Posted: March 22, 2009

great course, poor amenities

I absolutely loved the course. It was nice and flat, and went through very scenic areas of DC. There was lots of room for spectators and runners. BUT, because of sharing with the half marathoners, they were completely out of cups at the first half of the water stations. They just provided jugs to drink out of and share with other runners - VERY UNSANITARY. Not to mention the fact that they were out of GU as well. After the half marathoners dropped off, it was fine, but it really sucked worrying about nutrients during the first half. Plus, there was very little food at the end compared to other races - just bananas, oranges and plain bagels (although, based on how the aid stations were stocked, they probably just ran out of good stuff). But because the course was so great and the start and finish went pretty smoothly, it was an overall good experience.
4.0

By: Scott W.

Posted: March 22, 2009

Good course but other things weren't great.

Good course, especially the first part. Running past the capitol building and Supreme Court, etc., was great, but D.C. being D.C., the rest seemed like Baghdad post-invasion. Also the start was not in the best locale. Wouldn't want to be there at night. The organization was a bit haphazard. They appeared undermanned more than anything else. Not a lot of spectators or atmosphere. So, run for the first part of the course.
3.0

By: Rodee S.

Posted: March 22, 2009

Great Marathon/Nicely Organized

This was my first marathon and I was really impressed. I'm a DC resident, and the course takes you through the entire city, including areas that I've never been before. The course is attractive and relatively flat. There is one notable hill that really presented no issues at mile 6-7 and a few rolling ones (only because you're exhausted) from miles 23-25. You retrace your steps after the halfway point (which is excellent because you get to go DOWN Capitol Hill again). Overall, I'd say it's fast. No huge crowds in the second half, but I'm not a huge rah-rah guy anyway and the volunteers and water stations were plentiful and incredibly enthusiastic. Miles 17ish-25 are tough, but for a first marathon, it really was fantastic and I'd recommend it to anyone.
5.0

By: Jen M.

Posted: March 22, 2009

A great course and way to see the real DC

I am a native and loved seeing all four quadrants of the city shine. It helped that the weather was beautiful. The course had a few hills but just enough to give the legs some variety. The management was impressive. Being able to wait indoors in the Armory was a fantastic treat (thank you!). I'd definitely recommend it. I am looking forward to running it again next year.
4.0

By: Peter S.

Posted: March 21, 2009

Good 1st-time marathon, but some growing pains

This was my first marathon, and overall I was satisfied with the experience: 2009 was the 4th running of the DC marathon, and the organization is going through growing pains. They did some things very well, but other areas are in need of improvement. All of the following were highlights: -Online registration was easy, and there were lots of helpful email updates in the weeks before the marathon. -The expo had lots of booths and was well-organized. -The pre-race countdown was well organized and went very smoothly. -There were hundreds of helpful DC police on the route, which was well-marked and took us through a variety of neighborhoods. The course was fast and mostly flat. -There were plentiful volunteers who seemed well-briefed, and enthusiastic. -The finish line area was well-organized, and well-stocked at the, ahem, 5-hour mark. There were a few frustrating moments, and I think these are the result of a rapidly-growing organization; 2009 had 8,000 runners, compared with 4,000 in 2008. Three quarters of the 8,000 runners were there for the half marathon. Because of this, the first half of the course was crowded, and the second half wide-open. Also frustrating: -Water stops were at odd-numbered mile markers throughout the race. Running at a 10-minute/mile pace for the first half, there were no cups remaining at miles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11. Race volunteers had runners sip from 1-gallon water jugs, which led to lines. -There were very few porta-johns on the course, leading to long lines for the first half of the course. Given that the entire course is in urban areas, this was very frustrating. -There were 3 GU stops on the course. All 3 were folded up and gone by the time I passed through. -There were very few spectators on the course (though those present were very enthusiastic). Riding the metro home, most passengers seemed unaware that there was a marathon occurring today. I suspect that a lot of these concerns will be addressed for future years. I was happy with my decision to have this be my first marathon.
3.0

By: George (Ted) Hobart

Posted: March 21, 2009

Awesome Course, But Ran Out of Water!

I did the half marathon and the course was spectacular! I was very pleased with almost everything, except that there were 4 water stops without cups and 2 water stops without water. Fortunately for me, I carry my own water, but I wonder about everyone else. Other than that, the race was amazing with many wonderful views of the US Capitol.
5.0

By: Ron S.

Posted: March 21, 2009

Could be great with some improvement

Mostly I echo the other comments, with the exception that the hills are not entirely insignificant. If you are shooting for a BQ, expect to lose two minutes because of the hills on the course. Assuming the race directors read this, here are some spots for improvement: 1. Great technical shirt in the goody bag, but cheapo stenciling for logo and lettering. Wash it a half-dozen times and you'll see what I mean. 2. Who decided that putting porta-potties right next to the start line was a good idea? Yes, they form a good "wall" for the starting corals. But the stench as you wait for the start is horrible! Especially at 7 a.m., this is not good. 3. Granted, this is a city marathon and you take what you get, but couldn't they prod the city into traversing the course and filling potholes? I saw three runners fall; one had what appeared to be a nasty head bash, though the others were not as bad. 4. Elevate the mile markers! With 5,000 runners and mile markers at ground level, they were impossible to see. Not good when you are trying to stay on a particular pace. 5. The narrow starting corals are good because they provide for a smaller flow of runners over the starting line, which helps with early course crowding. But the pacing markers in the starting corals should be farther apart for the more popular times, rather than evenly spaced. The area for the 7:00 pace was wide open, whereas the area for the 8:30 pace was extremely crowded. There needs to be more space between pace corals to accommodate the number of anticipated runners for that pace. 6. Does there really need to be metal detector security for the expo? I mean, Bart Yasso is famous, but he's not exactly a target! That may be the policy of the D.C. Armory, but it seems like the marathon could get an exemption. Waiting out in the cold for someone to wave a wand over each person entering is kind of silly.
4.0

By: Daryl Anderson

Posted: November 07, 2008

Great Race for First Course.

This is an excellent course for any first-time, second-time, or 50th-time runners. This was the first time I had ever run a marathon and I actually forgot that I was running 26.2 miles. There are so many wonderful sights to see, and the race was well organized. I was completely at peace the whole time I was running. I would highly recommend others to run this course.
5.0

By: Justin B.

Posted: May 05, 2008

Great first marathon

This was my first marathon and I couldn't have asked for a better experience. Some highlights  - Metro opened at 5am to allow runners to get to the start on time (thanks DC!) - Cold and windy at the start but great weather overall for the run - Nice course through parts of DC I know well and some that were new to me - Ran with Mayor Fenty for miles 5 and 6 and then again around 21-22. - Spectators were good in the first half - Loved the sign held by a couple north of the Capitol 'If you lived here, you'd be running faster now.' - Bag drop-off/pick-up was effortless. Nice job! - Great announcing at the start/finish. Came across the finish line with U2's Beautiful Day blaring from the speakers. Nice. - Good aid stations but what was up with the Red Bull station and Red Bull girls? I think that's the last thing I'd want on a long run. Running past the station smelled like a bad night out! Overall, a great race. I'll be back!
5.0

By: Heather G.

Posted: April 15, 2008

Great experience for first marathon

I'm glad that I chose this as my first marathon. It was a great course. Mostly flat with a couple of small hills. The course went through almost every section of the city so I got to see areas that I haven't been to before. The weather was perfect and it was timed nicely with peak bloom of the cherry blossoms. There were plenty of water stops, however I couldn't find any Gu at the half when it was supposed to be there. The crowd support really lacked on the second half. I will probably do this again sometime but my sights now are on preparing for the MCM in the fall.
4.0

By: Shirley K.

Posted: April 13, 2008

Wonderful experience

The first part takes you to the traditional sights of DC and the second to the "hidden" southeast. Excellent course; the hills are mainly in the 6-9 miles, some hills in the 23, but nothing terrible. I cut 6 minutes. I wasn't too strong for this one, but if you come prepared, you can have a great performance. Plenty of water/Gatorade stations and Gu. I particularly enjoyed that it was not too crowded. It's never nice to share the course with the half-marathoners, but it's a fact in most of the marathons. My big complaint is that the 26-mile marker was way off; at that point you can tell what it means to run .2, and that was way more than .2. But overall, a wonderful experience; I hope it won't grow too much.
4.0

By: thomas g.

Posted: April 12, 2008

great marathon

I loved every bit of this marathon. It could have used more vendors at the expo. But when I got the email about the metro being open at 5 a.m., I got this warm feeling of love. It had a great course, great spectators, and great medal; I will definitely be around in 2009 to run the half marathon.
5.0

By: Stacy F.

Posted: April 10, 2008

Beautiful course!!

Best course yet. A couple of hills, but not overdone.
5.0

By: Brent Corey M.

Posted: April 09, 2008

A very pleasant, well organized race!

What can I say? I had a six-minute PR and qualified for Boston for the first time. Of course I loved this race! Train for the hills and you'll be fine. I hardly noticed the uphill from miles 4-7 since it was so gradual (about a 200-foot climb). The hill at 24 is tough, but only about a 1/2-mile long. Good mix of city streets, riverside trail, parks, and great views of the capitol. The last 1/2-mile was a slight uphill to the finish. That was tough, but a great finish line crowd. I may run the 1/2 in 2009 to prep for Boston.
4.0

By: Lawrence T.

Posted: April 08, 2008

Well organized, nice-sized marathon

This was a very nice marathon and a perfect size in my opinion. The start was not too crowded and the fact that there was also a half marathon gave us marathoners nice company for the first half. The spectators were great, although at times they were a little sparse. For me that is ok because it is nice to have a little break from spectators as well. The course gives a nice tour of DC and some of its neighborhoods. There were some smallish hills at times during the first 7 miles, a lot of flats in the middle and a couple of decent hills at miles 24-25, so be prepared for that. The Metro enabled my cheering squad to see me a couple of times. The 7 a.m. start is perfect and the weather this year (40 degrees at the start) was perfect. Just a couple of negatives: 1) the expo wasn't much, although I don't run marathons for the expo, 2) the starting line area wasn't totally set up yet at 5:30 a.m. when I arrived, and 3) I don't know how/why they had the 26-mile marker at 25.5 miles. Other than these few things, the race was great and well organized, the website had good information leading up the the race, and there were plenty of porta-potties at the start, well-stocked aid stations every 2 miles, and excellent volunteers. I hope to be back in 2009.
4.0

By: Yvonne W.

Posted: April 08, 2008

great race overall but one major problem....

This isn't the course, if you are looking for FLAT, but it's much much better than Marine Corps! Not nearly as crowded, and nice spectators/water stations. But I MUST complain about the 26-mile marker being so completely OFF. I started to really run it out and STILL had 0.5 to go! I found it very unprofessional! PLEASE take care of your markers! Especially AT THE END!!!
3.0

By: Mark C.

Posted: April 07, 2008

A quality race with PR potential

I encourage everyone to seriously consider this race. The course was more than fair, the scenery was great and spectators (at least for the first half of the race) were rather plentiful and enthusiastic. I enjoyed the fact that people were on their front stoop or hanging out a window to cheer us on. The band and cheer squad near Howard University was also very much appreciated. In terms of the course itself, if you train on any hills whatsoever then there isn't really anything too much daunting about this marathon. The uphill near mile 8 was definitely manageable. The only hills that are really troublesome are the rolling hills around miles 23-24. They're neither steep nor long; it's just that after having run the vast majority of the race, any little elevation gain will take its toll. I was feeling fairly good until after the hills, which took most of any kick I had left out of me. Still, I managed to maintain my overall pace and still get a PR (3:13 and change) by over 5 minutes. In terms of improvement, I would just reiterate a concern posted by many of the runners of the 2007 race  more on-course porta-johns in the first few miles of the race. I don't recall seeing one until about mile 5 or 6, and then it was only 1 or 2 (as I recall). My buddy and I finally took time to take a pit stop around mile 10, where there were four potties, but we still had to wait for just a bit. I should also add that the big increase in attendance this year really strained the number of porta-johns at the race start - the lines were VERY long with 10 minutes to race start. It would be helpful to open the armory race morning for some additional toilet facilities. Overall, a highly enjoyable race, and in terms of size, just about right. The expo the day before isn't much more than a "stop-in and pick up your shirt and number" affair, but again, it's not a Boston or NYC.
4.0

By: Christine H.

Posted: April 04, 2008

A fun challenge

I have read the comments so far posted and agree with most. In general this was a great marathon! Issues: Porta-potty access was rough. Lines were entirely too long. I had read that this was an issue last year, and planned accordingly. There are some personal potty devices on the market or even your toddler's little potty can come in handy. May be a little gross, but better then waiting in line forever. The final .2 was incorrect! I wore a Garmin the entire run and hit my watch at each mile split. The 26 mile mark came about a quarter mile too early. Since it was flat on the ground, and the winds were blowing, I assume it was blown down the road. My Garmin actually had my final run distance as 26.7. A full half mile longer. This is most likely due to early people weaving and lots of turns on the course. Only a 100 extra feet per mile will give you an added 1/2 mile. Keep that in mind when you look at your results. The drawbridge. I had forgotten about that until I read the below comment. The running surface was like a metal crate. I actually felt dizzy looking down at it and tried to look up. The footing was weird too. The start was crowded and narrow for the first bit and I wish people would line up according to their pace. But, that's the runners, not the marathon. The course was more challenging, in my opinion, than the elevation charts indicated. Definitely a rolling marathon. I would have liked to have seen GU available in the first half. And please, no red Gatorade. Messy! Pacing groups: I was really excited to use the pacing group provided, but was unable to find them at the start. Later in the race, I was surprised as I passed the 3:50 group (they had bibs on their backs). I was on a 3:40-or-so pace and I was passing them after the halfway mark! No wonder no one was with them. I had planned on trying to stick with the 3:40 pace group, and saw them at a turnaround point, about 5-8 minutes ahead of me! I finished in 3:41. I was on; they were too fast. It would have been nice to have a group during the winds and tougher spots. Every marathon has its issues, but when the day is done, I liked the experience I had and would do it again! Plus, I qualified for Boston!
4.0

By: peter n.

Posted: April 02, 2008

Great Marathon Experience

I have nothing but great things to say about this marathon - perfect size; challenging, but not too challenging course; easy, convenient and well run expo; great transportation options; great view of the nation's capital. I PR'd by 12 minutes on this relatively easy course. For those looking for a perfectly flat course, this is not it, but none of the hills are too severe and they are properly spaced - except for the three consecutive climbs between miles 24 and 25 (I would have preferred to hit those a bit earlier in the race).
4.0

By: Alex B.

Posted: April 02, 2008

Beautiful day, beautiful course, beautiful run

Overall, this was a really great race. The Metro opening early was brilliant, and the start/finish being so close was just really convenient. I loved how small (relatively) it was because you didn't have to worry about being squished among people - especially after all the half-ers left! All of that being said, I also wonder if that last .2 was measured correctly (or maybe the 26 sign had been moved inadvertently), and was bummed to see that the t-shirts were unisex because the small goes halfway down my thighs. Also, the support for the second half was pretty sparse and I was a little peeved that the half-marathoners got most of the attention. And all of the bananas were gone when I finished. Other than that, I really can't complain. I PRed and qualified for Boston and was completely ecstatic despite any shortcomings there might have been.
4.0

By: Greg S.

Posted: April 01, 2008

My first, and I ran with the mayor!

This was my first marathon and I would highly recommend this race to anyone. Entry fees are reasonable, the organization was awesome and the city did a top-notch job, opening up the Metro two hours early just for us runners! I got to thank Mayor Fenty somewhere around mile 4, but when I had run out of steam in the last mile he came out of nowhere and passed me up. Having a "celebrity" to chase, I tried to speed up, but my body wouldn't do it. I liked the course a lot. The less scenic points came along when I was oblivious anyway. Perfectly distributed hills provide refreshing changes of pace at the beginning and mostly easing up toward the end, though miles 24 and 25 were up and down, this year against a headwind. I'm from Indiana so I likely wasn't prepared for the terrain. Aid stations were well placed and one of them had hot women handing out Red Bull (??). Downsides: The packet pickup was sort of intense - not sure why I had to go through metal detectors. The post-race food selection wasn't terrific but ingesting food was nearly impossible. Bonus: they give away FREE BEER and bottles of water. If I'd have needed to use the facilities, I'd probably complain about a lack of those.
5.0

By: Sarah P.

Posted: April 01, 2008

Gets better every year!

This is my second year running the National Marathon. I enjoyed it last year, but this year was so much better (I even PR'd!). The course was reversed from last year and the one big hill was taken out. The first half still had some hills, the biggest one at mile 6, but they were manageable. The rest of the course just had some rollers. The first 2 miles were beautiful, with views of the sun coming up over the capitol building among the cherry blossoms. The section along the river (miles 19-23) was quite scenic as well. The weather in DC this time of year is great for running. Spectators were pretty scarce the second half of the race and there was virtually no entertainment on the course if you need that type of thing. The Metro was extremely convenient to get to and from the race. The organization overall seemed more polished this year. Port-O-Potties were much more plentiful along the course and they actually had starting corrals, which was good since you start with the half-marathoners. My only complaints were fairly small. There was a big lack of parking at the expo. We were told parking lots were supposed to be open, but with all the roads blocked off, there was no way to get to them. I also didn't like that every water stop had a different flavor of Gatorade - I had red, lemon-lime, grape, and blue; please just stick with one flavor next year. Also the sign for mile 26 was severely misplaced. It was the longest 0.2 miles of my entire life! The food at the end was just OK - salty soft pretzels and beer were good, but some cookies would have been nice. Overall, a fast course and a great spring marathon!
4.0

By: Alan T.

Posted: April 01, 2008

Great Marathon Weather

Now that I've run 2 marathons, I have some qualification to comment. I really enjoyed this run, and took over 30 minutes off of my 1st marathon in Dec. Weather was excellent, except no indoor waiting area out of the cold before the race, but after the sun came up, no issue. They should open the armory in case of inclement weather, and I prefer indoor, pre-race plumbing. Running through the streets of DC is an inspiring experience. Peak cherry blossoms add to it. There's enough real estate that I didn't see the need to repeat Constitution Ave. Water stops were regularly spaced and organized. Smallish (compared to Dallas) but good fan support, mostly in the neighborhoods. The announcer bringing you across the finish line did a good job. They could have had more food at the post-race, but as long as they save a few beers for me, I'm good. Expo seemed small for a city like DC. Nice medal. All in all, great race!
4.0

By: Rob M.

Posted: April 01, 2008

Very impressive

For my 5th marathon, I chose this one - and I don't regret it. I saw parts of Washington that I would not have seen on any sightseeing trip. The volunteers and organization were top-notch, but as a previous commenter noted, the expo was quite sad and the shirt left something to be desired. I personally hate "finisher" on my shirt. I think it is redundant. If you like medals, this one was not gaudy or outlandish but very nice, and there was plenty of free beer as well.
5.0

By: Rebecca B.

Posted: April 01, 2008

Great Saturday marathon

For those of us who don't run Sundays, this is a great Saturday marathon. The course was manageable with slight inclines and declines. The finisher's medal includes all the details of the race (date, place, etc.) Your bib has your last name printed on it; that was a nice touch. It's well timed with the cherry blossom festival. I was happy with the sponsor hotel (Renaissance Marriott). It's a race I plan to do again!
4.0

By: Charli L.

Posted: March 31, 2008

Just keeps getting better...

I ran the half last year and this year, so I cannot comment on the second half of the course. But, comparing 2007 to 2008, wow, this race just keeps getting better. I know that my few minor complaints about last year were taken care of this year. Not sure how much is due to the new sponsor (SunTrust) or not.... Metro opened early and this was well publicized, so you didn't have to drive in if you didn't want to worry about finding the RFK lots. The shirts are nice, technical, short-sleeve Reebok brand, with different colors for the full and the half. The medals feature the logo and your distance (not like last year's, which was one big WIREFLY announcement). There was plenty of food and drink at the finish and not much of a crowd - I just walked up and got what I wanted, with no lines! Plenty of enthusiastic spectators and city residents out cheering. If you are complaining about lack of support this year, you really would have been upset last year because I would say the number of people out there supporting the race more than doubled. The course does a good job of showcasing the city (good and bad) and has some rolling hills. We really lucked out with the weather; this year we had a cool, sunny day with the cherry blossoms in bloom. Refreshment stations were well supplied and abundant. There were a lot more porta-potties this year, and in general more pre-race festivities. The race is growing. I hope they will stick to the qualifying times (which are modest) and keep this one on the smaller side; for a three-ring circus, wait for the fall, and do Marine Corps. For a fun, challenging run through the city, do National!
4.0

By: David Trevino

Posted: March 31, 2008

Keeps getting better, better, and better

I have participated in the National Marathon/Half Marathon event over the last 3 years (2 marathons, and half-marathon) and I have to say - each year the entire organization has gotten better, and better. The National Marathon/Half Marathon running event is destined to be one of the best in the United States. I personally prefer the National over the Marine Corps (MC); however, the MC is still a good organization. Washington D.C. has two of the best marathons in the U.S. For those who have not run a marathon in Washington, D.C., well you have 2 good ones to participate in - one in the spring (National); the other in the fall (MC). The course for this year's National Marathon, in my opinion, was terrific; for the number of runners the expo was the right size, and I see this growing as the number of runners increases in the coming years; for the spectators that came out to cheer the runners on, it was greatly appreciated; and last, by not least, the scenery was great. It's also nice to have a mayor that participates in these events. The Race Director, Mr. Rick Dowling, and his staff, deserve a huge congratulations for all the good, and hard work they put in in making this event a huge success. I will keep coming back, and have already made the National Marathon one of my favorites to run in.
5.0

By: Lu C.

Posted: March 31, 2008

A wonderful marathon experience

This is a great alternative to the Marine Corps Marathon. Now everyone should run one MCM but one is about enough. National Marathon had lots of arm room, lots of spirit, GREAT volunteers, and not enough can be said for HOWARD UNIVERSITY! I wanted to take them the whole 26.2 with me. The only thing better was the Michelob Ultra at the end. BUT... did they measure that 0.2 miles at the end correctly?
5.0

By: Suzy Holt

Posted: March 31, 2008

Vote for National Marathon!

The expo left something to be desired, but I was VERY satisfied with the moisture wicking shirt and ease of packet pick up. The course offered great views of the city- certainly the best way to 'see' our Nation's capital. The course was mostly flat and the few uphill portions had immediate downhills to match. The weather was great this year and I loved seeing the trademark DC cherry blossoms and tulips! The number of participants is perfect: no bottlenecks, yet constant runner camaraderie. The good number of elite athletes and "celebrity" runners (Dan Jansen, Mayor Fenty) made it an exciting event to be a part of! Volunteers were enthusiastic, and there were amazing spectators; if it were up to me, the Howard University crew would win the "best spirit" award. They were CrUnK!!! Well-organized finisher's area and good-looking medal (well, minus the Sun Trust logo all over the ribbon... yeah, we get it that you are the title sponsor!!).
4.0

By: David S.

Posted: March 30, 2008

Well Organized Race

Overall a very well organized race. The event was all within the confines of DC and takes the runner through many neighborhoods - some more scenic than others. The first half of the race is slighly hilly with the second half mostly flat. The first half was a nice course in spite of the hills. The 2nd half of the marathon lacked the scenery once you crossed the Anacostia. Still a very nice race, well staffed and well run. The only negative comment was the food at the end. Something more filling and hearty than bagels and granola bars would be nice.
4.0

By: Robin S.

Posted: March 30, 2008

Can only get better with time

EXTREMELY well-organized. Getting the Metro to open early was FANTASTIC - made getting to/from the race easy. It also very easy for family/friends to see you several times along the course. OVERALL, great course, and EXCELLENT volunteers and runner support from start to finish in terms of water, Gu, bathrooms, etc. In terms of the course itself, the first 2/3 was interesting and had good crowd support - especially at Howard University. THANKS! Last 1/3 was weak on crowd support and the last several miles were a bit desolate when you probably need the most support. Great time of year - cool weather and cherry blossoms... and it allows for training over fall/winter. Two cons that would be easily be remedied: (1) Female sizes - I would love to wear a finisher t-shirt that fits; (2) Expo - pretty underwhelming. I hope it will get better as the event grows.
4.0

By: Denise R.

Posted: March 30, 2008

Would definitely do it again.

Great support from volunteers, police, and paramedics throughout the 26 miles (which had some small, very manageable hills). I PRed, 36 minutes off my last marathon. Two points: Not enough potties, and the expo and schwag were weak. Still, I'd do it again in a heartbeat. Metro opened early, announcer was fabulous, cherry blossoms full, and nice crowds.
4.0

By: Cherry G.

Posted: March 30, 2008

Great Test

I'll preface this by saying that the only other marathon I've run is the Marine Corp in 2007. Compared to MCM, this is definitely a much smaller event that is a well-kept secret so far. Packet pick-up was the day before from 11 a.m. - 9 p.m. at the D.C. Armory, which is right next to RFK Stadium where the race started. Race organizers recommended parking in Lot 3 for the expo. Unfortunately the signs around the armory and stadium are in poor shape - faced and difficult to read. To make matters more frustrating, the road leading to the lot was blocked off by DC Police and they were of absolutely no help in directing traffic. The ones that we saw were leaning up against the fence as traffic built up with runners who were looping around the stadium several times to find the recommended parking lot. Once inside the armory we had to go through a security check. We got there around 11:30, and at that time they were not allowing people to bring water or any kind of drink into the expo. While we were standing in line, they changed the rule and said that drinks were okay. The expo - if you want to call it that - was nothing to rave about. Maybe 2-3 vendors selling gear, and a few more random booths that I didn't think were worth visiting. Getting to the stadium the morning of the race was fairly easy. We live near Dulles Airport and left the house at 5:00 a.m. and were in the parking lot by around 5:35 a.m. Tons of parking at the stadium, which was about a 5-minute walk to the starting area. Of course, the lines for the port-o-johns were long. It was about 39 degrees at the start, so we waited until after using the port-o-johns to check our bags in. The bag check line for the marathon was pretty much non-existent so I was able to walk right up and drop off my bag. But the bag check line for the half-marathon was ridiculously long. I had heard the day before that 70% of the participants for this race ran the half-marathon. The course itself was really nice. Some of the sights were similar to the Marine Corp Marathon like the Smithsonian buildings and Washington Monument. But the course took you through some areas that are not on the typical touristy parts of town that gave you a better appreciation of what the city is really like. The part of the course along Anacostia Drive reminded me of Haines Point in the Marine Corp Marathon. It's toward the latter part of the race (in this case, miles 21-23), it's along the water, breezy/windy, and there are very few people along that stretch - a definite test of your mental strength. The course was hillier than I expected, especially the last few miles through Anacostia. It seemed like every time we got over one hill, there was another one waiting ahead. For anyone who has heard negative things about Anacostia (it always seems to be in the local news), I'll admit that it's not the prettiest parts of town; it definitely makes you appreciate what you have. Plenty of cops along that area of the course, so I never felt threatened. The few local residents that were out around the course either kept to themselves or clapped as we ran by. One lady who had definitely looked like she had been through some rough times was out near the water station high-fiving people as they ran by. Overall I thought this was a pretty good race. It's fairly new, so it definitely has some room for improvement. The expo, as I've already, mentioned could be beefed up. The mile markers were sporadically available. I saw one at mile 1 and didn't see another until mile 4. This seemed to be a problem mainly through the first half of the course because the mile markers during the 2nd half were either more available or more visible. Nonetheless it made it difficult to figure out what my actual pace was since I couldn't count on the markers being available. This was the first race I've run where they kept changing the Gatorade flavor at each station. A little nerve-racking since I wasn't sure how my stomach would react to all the different flavors. (Although a little amusing when you saw someone with a white shirt that looked like it had been tie-died with Gatorade.) Based on some of the previous reviews, it looks like they've taken input about the lack of port-o-johns seriously, since there seemed to be plenty along the course. Finish-line area was well-staffed with volunteers. I was so thankful to have a volunteer available to remove the chip from my shoe. Plenty of bagels, bananas, oranges, granola bars, water, and soft pretzels in the food tent even for a slower (4:04) marathoner like me. As other people have already said, this is one of those races where you really have to rely on yourself to get you through it. Not a lot of spectators. Heck, not even a whole lot of marathoners (1,386 finished). But it's a great race to see what you're capable of when you're not having to fight for elbow room and when you've really got to look within yourself to see what you've got.
4.0

By: Joan Smith

Posted: March 30, 2008

great race... can't wait 'til next year

This race was well organized from beginning to end. The course was great! This is definitely one to do again.
4.0

By: Kelsey S.

Posted: March 29, 2008

Great First Marathon!

I am writing this with very sore legs while my thoughts are still fresh! This was my first marathon, and I am glad I picked it because the size was perfect. The course was centered around the capitol building and I really enjoyed it. We ran through very neat neighborhoods, had waterfront views, and saw plenty of cherry blossoms, the National Monument and of course, the Capitol Building. There were a few hills, but nothing crazy. On the course the volunteers were great, with plenty of water and Gatorade stops, and although I didn't have to use them, I heard no bathroom complaints. The worst parts of the course were: Around mile 22 we were heading straight into a 15 mph wind for about 2 miles, but that was the weather's fault. Also, we ran across a drawbridge and I don't know about anyone else but the bad footing really killed me. The crowd was pretty good along most of the course. At mile 8 or so a school set up a spirit section and it was really neat. I could have used that again at mile 21! Some negatives: The race packet was lacking pretty bad for $95, and the expo wasn't great. Also, more bathrooms were needed before the race (although I am sure this is a normal problem, but I had to wait almost half an hour) as well as more toilet paper (there was NONE after the race). All in all, I thought this was a great event, and would definitely recommend it.
4.0

By: Amanda P.

Posted: March 29, 2008

A Surprisingly Magnificent Marathon!

A beautiful DC spring day, cherry blossoms in perfect condition, wonderful volunteers, cheerful runners, and vocal and considerate spectators all added up to a fantastic marathon experience. The organization was good, and the course was interesting (full of hills to take on and enough twists and turns to be entertaining). I would have liked to see driving directions posted for getting to RFK; but I was very glad to see the Metro open early for the race. For those of us disappointed with what MCM has turned into, this was a welcome alternative.
4.0

By: Steve J.

Posted: March 29, 2008

Runner Feedback

First time I've run this course. Positives: -Well organized. -Enthusiastic volunteers. Thank you to everyone who helped make this race possible. -Good aid stations - Gatorade and water at every stop (every two miles). Gu at 13 and 20, exactly as advertised. The volunteers at the water stops were all great - very on the ball. -Good shirt. -I generally like the smaller marathons. But, with the wind in this year's race, it made it tough to have nobody around. Negatives: -Anemic expo. Actually depressing. A dank building with nothing to speak of in terms of vendors. Maybe turn on some music or something. -Lame goody bag. Not that I really care about the contents of the bag, but they don't give you a decent size bag that you can use for the bag check at the race. Fairly common practice, I thought. -Not enough port-o-johns at the start. Seems a bit foolish to me that a race this small still has lines 20- and 30-deep at the port-o-johns. If you don't invest in the port-o's, don't be surprised when people run across the street and do their business on RFK Stadium. Would have liked to see them follow Baltimore Marathon's lead, and gain access to the stadium itself, so that people could use the bathrooms in there before the start. For a smaller race like this, a Steamtown-like starting line would be ideal (i.e. in a gymnasium). Especially at this time of year. -The 7:00 a.m. start is rough, especially in late March. Would be nice if the city could accommodate an 8:00 a.m. start. -Expect cold weather at the start of a March marathon. Therefore, expect people to hold onto their warm up clothes as long as possible, and check them at the last minute. Therefore, staff up those bag checks, big time. I was glad I had family at the start, because the line at the bag checks with 5 minutes until race time was insane. -Very little fan support throughout the majority of the course. -Ran the entire back half of the marathon (after the halfers peeled off) by myself. Made it tough with the wind - no groups to tuck in with for shelter. Ran a 2:56, just for reference - big spread between people at that point in the race (i.e. hundreds of yards up to the next person). Makes it difficult to try and reel people in. Between this spread and the lack of fan support, I felt like I was out on a tough training run/time trial - not a marathon. -Hotel situation isn't ideal. One of the main benefits of running a smaller marathon is the logistical ease. Should be able to walk out of the hotel to the starting line. If you keep the field relatively small, perhaps consider moving the start and finish to someplace in the city with a few hotels in walking distance. General comments: -Tough course. Hillier than the elevation chart would lead you to believe. A good challenge. -Brutal wind this year. Not gusts, but long headwinds. Between the hills and the head/tailwinds, my mile split times were all over the place. -Bottom line is that this was a well planned and well organized race. But, there just doesn't seem to be enough investment in it by sponsors or the city. -I would recommend sliding the date a few weeks later to get some better weather (not that there is any guarantee with that - just look at Boston). Other than picking up a few folks who will use the half as a tune-up for an April race (Boston), I don't see any reason not to move it a little later. Glad I ran it. Ran a PR here by 5.5 minutes with a 2:56. Didn't quite hit the time that I was looking for (2:55:00 - NYC qualifier), but that's okay. But, I would have no reason to come back and run this race again.
3.0

By: Michelle K.

Posted: October 09, 2007

Better than Marine Corps!

I ran the new (2nd year) Wirefly National Marathon in 2007, having done the venerable Marine Corps marathon in Oct 2006. The National Marathon was much smaller, one didn't have to battle for elbow room during or after the race! The course as also nice, weaving through all 4 quadrants of the city, letting even us residents see areas we don't know well. Much better post-race organization as well. There were not enough toilets on the course and I lost 6 min waiting at the first one I found (at mile 8!), but race organizers have assured me that that would be taken care of this year. Overall a great race, and I plan to do this from now on as opposed to MC.
4.0

By: jacqueline e.

Posted: September 09, 2007

no bells and whistles, but nice

It was cold and rainy. It was nice seeing some of the sites, but some of the race was quite deserted. It was a small event, but organized. The local people were friendly and quite supportive. I have no real complaints, except I hated the hill... but I hate all hills. It's not one that I would do again unless I was looking for a late winter marathon. However, that is sometimes tough to train for in the middle of winter in the Northeast.
4.0

By: Marlin (reluctant runner) Keesler

Posted: September 01, 2007

The ultimate DC tour

Come to DC and run. You won't regret the experience. There is an added sense of euphoria running through our nation's capital. Running past the various memorials and landmarks has a tendency to compound your sense of satisfaction when you cross the finish line. I truly enjoyed my experience running this marathon. I have no complaints; rather, I left with a fond experience to share with others. If you do this one, plan on staying a couple of days and get the most of what DC has to offer. This is my 2nd time running in DC. The 1st was the 2002 marathon that went bankrupt.
5.0

By: John Ryan A.

Posted: May 13, 2007

Perfectly satisfactory marathon

Really not a bad 26.2 - my 3rd. I can't list a single complaint. Overall, the experience didn't have the extra touches of some of the more established events, but it was an event worth running again.
4.0

By: Chris B.

Posted: May 10, 2007

Really Great Event

This was my first marathon, and I couldn't have been happier. Loved the course - even the hill at mile 19, just where it should be, after that I KNEW I was gonna make it. Thought staff/volunteers were very helpful. Only issue was lack of porta-johns on course, a problem I'm sure they'll address for '08. A great mid-size marathon in a great destination - made a mini-vacation out of it - highly recommended
4.0

By: Toby Baker

Posted: April 20, 2007

Great Marathon

Pros: - Fantastic course (don't change it!) - I even loved the hill at 19.5. It gives the course more character. - Love the idea of a qualifying time. - Given the weather, I thought the crowd support was nice. - The packet pickup was an upgrade over the parking lot from last year. - Easy for family to see you throughout the day by using the Metro. Cons: - The lack of a good corral system at the start. Perhaps start the half/full marathon runners at different times, e.g. +/-15 minutes? - Post-race food. - T-Shirt. As long as this course is around, I'll never run the Marine Corps Marathon again.
4.0

By: David Trevino

Posted: April 20, 2007

Getting Better and Better

I ran the inaugural National Marathon last year, and this year I opted to run the half - as a prep for Boston. All I can say is that the Wireless National Marathon/Half Marathon has a lot of promise to becoming one of the favorites to run. Washington DC should have their own Marathon/Half Marathon run, not just being the Nation's Capital, but because of all the attactions to see and run by. I understand that this year's marathon course had been changed - the inaugural run was probably the most challenging course I have ever run. I would highly recommend this run to anyone, and I truly believe that anyone who enters the 2008 event will not be disappointed. My hope is that this event will be a permanent event for many years, and as a resident of this area, I plan on making this a yearly event, whether it be the full marathon, or the half.
5.0

By: Jessica D.

Posted: April 09, 2007

Pretty good

I had a really great time with this race. I had my family there to cheer me on and they were able to get to me pretty easily using the train. I have a couple of thoughts for future races. There were no potties for the first 7 miles. I had to use the bathroom and was forced to hold it for 6 miles. I walked for the first time ever in a marathon. I actually was close to tears I was so uncomfortable. Then I had to wait 6 minutes in line to use it. After that I felt great and ran to a PR and broke 4:30. If I had been able to use the bathroom earlier, I probably would have broken 4:25. Another addition I would make would be to give runners and spectators a route to get out easily. With all the roads being closed, it was difficult to find a route out. Overall, it was a great race. I really enjoyed it and definitely would recommend it to other runners.
4.0

By: Rip Davy

Posted: April 09, 2007

On the rise

Agree with most comments. Pluses: Running DC. Interesting and challenging course. Calvert Climb is a bear, but adds character. Running through the neighborhoods. Qualifying requirement ensured knowledgeable and polite runners. A+ for the pacers. Crowds were decent and vocal given the weather. Didn't notice the pit stop issue (people, stop guzzling water in the hour before you run). Shaved 7 minutes from my Marine Corps Marathon time and beat that smack-talking Fenty. Minuses: March in DC can be fickle. We got lucky with cool and misty weather. Finisher's medal was u-g-l-y, featuring the sponsor's ad (make it a capitol or something cool). T-shirt is hideous. Ankle bracelet timing chip. More cowbell. Overall: If they keep holding this race, I'll keep running it.
4.0

By: jason e.

Posted: April 04, 2007

Great course! Great Spectators! Good Beer!

This was my second marathon. I used to live in the DC area and I think you'd be hard pressed to design a marathon in DC that gives a better view of everything the City has to offer. It was a fun course, the spectators were great considering an early Saturday morning start and the size was perfect. Don't tell too many people about this one....
5.0

By: Sarah P.

Posted: April 03, 2007

Fun race, will only get better with time!

I really enjoyed this marathon!! Partly because I ran it purely for the fun of running, with no time goal in mind and partly because it was well organized and close to home. The expo was tiny in the huge Armory building, but it was easy to get to on the Metro and quick to get in and out of. There were no booths worth stopping at and the 'goody bag' was trash. I will wear the shirt though. The handing out of chips took way longer than it should have- the volunteers had to look through all of them to find the one with your number!!?? Also the Armory isn't in the best neighborhood- females go with somebody if you go at night. Race morning, it was easy to get to the start, there were plenty of Port-o-Pots in the starting area and bag check was very visable and easy. The start itself was a mess with half-marathoners and marathoners starting together. Even if you are a fast marathoner, start towards the middle of the pack otherwise you will get run over or end up starting way faster than planned. I enjoyed the course but highly recommend wearing an iPod (even though they say they are not allowed- SHhhh!). There was no music or entertainment on the course and few spectators, although more than I had expected. I saw parts of DC that I had never seen (even though I have been here tons of times)and enjoyed seeing the White House, Monuments and Capitol several times. The stretch through Rock Creek Park was scenic and peaceful with lots of local runners out. There were tons of GU stations although I thought the water stops were kind of far apart (often more than 2 miles). The one big hill at mile 19.5 was a doozy (long and steep) but doable, the rest was rolling hills, not too hard on the legs- felt good to have varied terrian. As others have noted, my biggest complaint was the lack of Port-o-Pots on course. I ended up stopping at a McDonald's because I couldn't wait anymore. Also, the lack of Port-o-Pots caused some runners to urinate off the side of a bridge around mile 9, no big deal except the marathon runners were running under the bridge!! I very narrowly missed getting a yellow shower. Have a little respect people! The finish line was exciting and my husband was able to get right up to see me finish. There were few food choices at the end, but I sure enjoyed my free beer! There was nothing going on in the finish area so it was quick to get my bag and take off. All in all, it was a fun race and it was nice having Sunday at home to recover. I would recommend this one to friends as it is bound to only get better next year.
4.0

By: Suzie S.

Posted: March 31, 2007

Marine Corp Marathon? Never Again!!

I live in the DC area and have run the Marine Corp for the last seven years. When I ran it this past year however I was SEVERELY disappointed in the course; it was way too crowded; the streets were too narrow to support all the runners; and the finishing area a mess! The Marine Corp keeps growing and growing and growing so the National Marathon was like a breath of fresh air! My only complaint was that there were virtually NO PORTA-POTTIES on the course, and therefore when I received the call of nature, I had to wait for awhile to find a porta-potty; and when I did find one, it took eight minutes of standing in line just to use it!!! I've done plenty of small marathons, so I didn't expect there to be one at every water station, but having only three in 26.2 miles is just plain crazy! Regardless, this is a good marathon, especially if you are looking for a smaller marathon that is fun and has tons to look at. I'll see you there next year....
4.0

By: Remus Medley

Posted: March 29, 2007

Name not listed

I had a great time, except no results.
4.0

By: Whitney S.

Posted: March 29, 2007

A fun atmosphere in which to run

This was my first marathon and I had a great time! I enjoyed the hills. I am from Houston and there are NO hills to incorporate into my training program. In addition, my baby turned 7 months on the day of the race. If I can do this, then everyone else should stop complaining about the hills. The police were fabulous cheerleaders and very much appreciated in their traffic control. People will always find something to complain about, but kudos to the organizers. This marathon gave me the marathon bug and I'm already planning for the next one.
3.0

By: Carol L.

Posted: March 28, 2007

Great tour of DC

I really enjoyed this marathon. In addition to running past the National Mall, we toured several areas off the beaten path, plus several miles through Rock Creek Park. Several weeks ago I ran the Myrtle Beach Marathon, and found that course a bit boring. I was never bored during this race. I have a few suggestions that would make this race even better: The volunteers were attentive at most of the intersections, but there were times when on-course markings would have been helpful. There were no porta potties until miles into the race and nowhere to sneak off into the bushes. Though I finished the race within the cut off time, I had to play leap frog with the street sweeper crews for the last 13 miles. These machines were not only noisy, but rather intimidating as they drove up behind me. (Myrtle Beach also had to open the roads as soon as their race was finished, and they had a much better system for handling their rolling clean-up.) The technical race shirt is soft and comfortable. I am proud I was able to do a marathon in our nation's capital and think the shirt's design could be improved to better reflect the race's location. If you are looking for a marathon in our nation's capital, this is the one to choose. The volunteers were great, the police helpful in traffic control,and the city was well showcased. Yes there were some hills, but they only added to the challenge of this race.
4.0

By: Ben B.

Posted: March 28, 2007

Awesomeness

This marathon was awesome! The first half was pretty easy, and while the second half was considerably more difficult, it was much better than the first half. I ran this race just to have fun, take pictures, talk to people, and screw around. I ACCIDENTLY got my PR at this race. I would love to do this one again. Any errors I saw were always for the better; there seemed to be more water stops than was reported in advance, and all of them had Gatorade. Gu was everywhere in the second half. The spectators ROCKED! One of them ran with me and sang the LSU fight song with me (an LSU alum). The only problem was that I listened to them say, "This is the last hill, I promise" - and I believed them every time. Anyway this marathon rocked. DO IT!
5.0

By: Mike K.

Posted: March 28, 2007

I Recommend This Race

Very well organized race. I can only imagine that it was no small feat to successfully coordinate a race through DC. What better way to tour the city? Kudos to the volunteers and cops who helped make the race safe and enjoyable. The fans who came out were also great, even though the runners probably liked the cool/misty weather more.
4.0

By: Charles B.

Posted: March 27, 2007

Good effort for 2nd time and new course

I cribbed this from a friend's blog but with editing reflects my views too - I ran the Half: Positives: Challenging course without being a killer. Huge downhill by the Capitol at mile 2; rolling hills from miles 8 through 12; but all runnable, nothing too brutal. Excellent course layout through interesting neighborhoods and through the Mall Several occasions to see front-runners on other side of road Fantastic road closures, well-monitored Plenty of room to run after the first mile Frequent, well-stocked aid stations, including gel at Mile 9 of the half Lots of parking close to the start Ample bathrooms (and shelter from rain!) at start Nice medals and finish area One of few races requiring qualifying times - knowledgeable runners Good support by DC Mayor Fenty, who ran the marathon Fun atmosphere Free beer! Negatives: Ugly white see-through t-shirt, although technical fabric Few exhibitors at expo (and having to go there on a Friday) Somewhat disorganized corral-free, seeding-free start (I really hated this and it made my first mile very slow.) Some aid stations were light on volunteers Some broken city pavement after the winter Unpredictable weather (rainy at the start this year, then drizzle for most of the race) Minimal food selection at finish area (bagels and bananas) although ample Leading marathoners had to run through half-marathoners at finish - could have been prevented with better coning to split road in last mile Half marathon course was long (almost .4) Few spectators, relatively little support from local residents
3.0

By: Alex L.

Posted: March 26, 2007

Flawed Half-Marathon Course

I have read several fellow half-marathon runners that noticed the same predicament I did: we run an extra 1/3 of a mile. My Garmin showed that I pounded 13.48 miles, rather than the 13.11 I had expected. That put a toll on my lactic acid intake and forced me to slow down at 13.11 miles after I had initiated my kick at 12.61 miles (according to my Garmin) and I still had - go figure - about 500 meters to go. It may not be recommendable to trust a Garmin to gauge your kick, BUT that would be reasonable if it was off by 0.1 or 0.15 miles, but by George, not by 0.37 miles (that is a brutal addition to a body cramping due to over-exertion). I would recommend the organizers focus more in double-checking this sort of distances for future races. Most of us train hard to break our PR's or get us a qualifying shot on another race. Ps. I give the course a "4" for its beauty - not for its accuracy. The organization gets a "1" for forgetting how to measure the distance for a race. A "5" to the few guys and gals who endured the rain and for being there at 7:00 a.m. on a Saturday just to make us feel good.
3.0

By: paul f.

Posted: March 26, 2007

Good race with a lot of potential

I didn't run the first race in 2006 after I saw the course. When I saw the 2007 course, I knew that I wanted to do it. The course itself was terrific for about 20 miles. The last 5 miles were in neighborhoods that have seen better days. But to its credit the good parts of the course were great- hitting most of the high points of DC. The rain was a little bit of a downer but at least it was reasonably warm and not like the previous weekend (Ice/snow/ flight cancellations up and down the East Coast). Packet pick up was easy but I could hardly call it an expo- there were probably 12 vendors at it tops. The start area was great and had everything you need- water, port-o's and coffee. One problem was that there were no port-o's on the course until 7.5 miles (for alot of runners, that is 50-80 minutes w/o a toilet) . As a guy, it is a little easier to find a place to go, but in Downtown DC there are not many bushes/trees to hide behind. I felt sorry for the fairer sex. This should be fixed for the next race. The spectators that were out were great- thank you to you all. I think this race has the poential to be a great spring race. When you think about it, there are so few good spring races out there, and this could really fill a niche in the schedule. I hope DC and the DC government cooperate with the race organizers to bring this race back even better next year. Since the Mayor participated in the Marathon, you know you have at least one supporter in the halls of government. I will run it again.
3.0

By: Jenny L.

Posted: March 26, 2007

Thank you for a great event!!!

Did the half in 2006 and a full in 2007. A big THANK YOU to Keith Dowling and his entire team! Awesome volunteers and police officers. You guys are the best! Calvert Climb and the rolling hills after were a challenge. Thanks to the woman who provided encouraging cheers: "Four more blocks til the end!" A big kudos to the spectators (between mile 1 and mile 2) who delivered my favorite running jacket to the bag check truck. Never thought I was going to see it again. You go, girls!!! -#775
4.0

By: Tim McGinty

Posted: March 26, 2007

Now DC Has Two Great Marathons!

This year's course is a 100% improvement over last year's! This is a runner's marathon. It's fast, fun, and as scenic as they come. We forgot we were running at times as we toured the District of Columbia. I thought I knew the area well, but we went to spots I've never been to before. We ran by the White House three times and we used the Washington Monument to get our bearings as we circled around the District. I got a big kick out of seeing the US Capitol looking inspiring in the fog and mist as we ran downhill toward it on the fast miles 22 and 23. I'm usually good at hitting my watch to mark every mile, but I was so taken by the views that I missed a lot of them. The race is well organized and they take care of the runners on the course. I don't worry about the food after a race; it's the fuel that is given out during the race that counts. There was enough GU, Clif Shots, and Gatorade to run you through an ultra. Our team had absolutely nothing but good things to say about this race. We enjoyed that little hill coming out of Rock Creek Park as it stretched out the legs and allowed you rest a bit as you used another set of muscles. The last 10K were mainly downhill and let us finish fast. It was a great workout for Boston! The 7 a.m. start was perfect! We were able to shower and go over to Clyde's in Georgetown in time for lunch and a little celebration before driving home.
5.0

By: mo s.

Posted: March 26, 2007

Great Marathon!

This was my first marathon, though I'd attended one before, and I could not have asked for more! Everything went smoothly, there are lots of water/Gu/power gel stops, and I thought the course was great! There are a few hills, with one big one, and most of the last few miles are downhill or flat. It was GREAT to see different parts of DC and I thought the spectators were motivating too! I thought the weather was perfect (once the rain stopped a few minutes before the start of the race). Even the DC mayor ran it! I had the best experience with this marathon! I would definitely recommend it to everyone. Despite having such a great experience, I will say that as someone else posted, there didn't seem to be many port-a-potties on the course. The other thing that might make things easier is to have people start the race by their expected pace instead of in a free-for-all.
5.0

By: Ginger W.

Posted: March 26, 2007

needs plenty of improvements...

I came to D.C. to run this young race with my brother, who has yet to run a marathon. As I prepared him for what to expect, I must admit I was disappointed in several items. First of all, the expo really has some room for improvement. The goodie bag held only flyers and one coupon for a fashion watch; where were the GU or other run-related items? Second of all, the porta-pottie situation was terrible. For a newbie running his first marathon, my brother really struggled when he had to run over 7 miles before seeing a porta-john - and even then, the wait at the john was almost two minutes! The amount of time we spent waiting for toilets and making up "lost ground" proved to really be frustrating for both of us. Thirdly, the post-race nourishment was truly LACKING. The bagels, bananas and water were not satisfying, nor were they what a runner really needed after grinding out 26.2 in the drizzle and cold weather, complete with decent inclines. A little bit of fruit or sugar whould have been really appreciated. However, I will say that the race volunteers were helpful and the medical tent was stellar. I must say that overall I was really disapointed, as was my brother - which is unfortunate, as this was his first marathon.
3.0

By: Guy M.

Posted: March 26, 2007

2007 race improves on inaugural year

I ran this race last year and came back hoping there would not be a sophmore jinx. They didn't disappoint; this year's full marathon course run completely in DC was a blast. The city seems to be getting more supportive of this spring marathon (the mayor ran the full marathon!) and hopefully they can continue to grow the event next year. Problems? Sure, there are some at every race. They seemed to have addressed two of the larger problems from last year that runners had concerns about - they revised the course and got rid of miles of rolling hills at the end of the race in Prince George's County, and there were a lot more portable toilets at the start. While the water stops and mile markers were well tended, there could have been more portable toilets on the course. The food after the race was a disappointment - very minimalist... water, bagels, bananas, and that's it. Oh, and beer! The city should work harder with RFK Stadium and their sports team tenants to open the stadium for the race - there is nowhere for spectators to hang out at the finish and the addition of a sports or health festival or an additional shorter running race would make for a fuller experience for those waiting for the half and full marathon runners to come in. Running the race on a Saturday? Nice having the Sunday after free but it makes it hard for out-of-town runners to get in and pick up their packet on Friday. For as "low key" as the expo is, the extra day off from work to get here on a Friday isn't really worth it. There are always ways to enhance a race, but I hope they also don't take their eye off of continuing to get the basics right. It's a slightly more competitive race since they have a 5-hour qualifying time requirement, and capping the entries at 5,000 keeps it from getting too oversized. They are going to get complaints from the locals for the road closings, but I hope enough runners give the race the support to be able to bring this same course back next year. Two years, two new PR's - can't ask for more than that!
4.0

By: Peirce M.

Posted: March 26, 2007

Great scenery; great course aid

This was a beautiful course. Very scenic with the tourist sites, as well as the riverfront and the neighborhoods. Easy parking at the start. The best part was the number of water and Gatorade stations - and there were around 4 GU stations! What a help. Mile 19 - Calvert Climb - was brutal. Gives the race an identity, but that hill was tough. Loved the beer at the end, though I didn't feel like drinking. An okay number of spectators. A lot even knew who Mark Grace is! Great volunteers. Good job, organizers.
4.0

By: Ed M.

Posted: March 26, 2007

Good course; bad organization

Yeah, the course was tough with the Calvert Climb at mile 20, but every course has or needs a challenge. I loved running through the city. No race day instructions for the runners, small expo, no indicators for pace groups at the start, NO MUSIC anywhere, and less food than at most 10K's at the end. Seemed kind of rinky-dink for a race put on by a for-profit company. The shirt and the medals both have the sponsor's name much larger than the race name and no graphics of the city on either... so if I wore the shirt (which I won't) I'm sure everyone would ask what the heck Wirefly is. This is not exactly why I ran the race. But everything went well. Lots of GU! I loved that part of it. Water stops were all very well populated and plenty of fluid. Weather held out this year. I guess all in all it will get better with each year - this being the 2nd annual. But some basics were not done well.
3.0

By: Nancy T.

Posted: March 25, 2007

Bright future for this race!

Right up front I want to say that I liked this race. I really liked this race a lot. It may be because it was a well-run event, or it may be because I felt good for every mile of the course. Either way, I think this race has a bright future. I recommend it highly and I'll definitely be back another year to run it again. Positives: Challenging course without being a killer. Huge decline by the capitol at mile 2; rolling hills from miles 8 through 12 (I only ran the half) - but all runnable, nothing too brutal. Excellent course layout through interesting neighborhoods and through the Mall. Several occasions to see front-runners on other side of road. Fantastic road closures - well-monitored. Plenty of room to run after the first mile. Frequent, well-stocked aid stations, including gel at Mile 9 of the half. Lots of parking close to the start. Ample bathrooms (and shelter from rain!) at start. Nice medals and finish area. One of few races requiring qualifying times - runners mostly knowledgeable. Fun atmosphere. Support from the DC Mayor (who ran it) is a big plus! Free beer! Negatives: Ugly, white, see-through t-shirt, although technical fabric. Few exhibitors at expo. Somewhat disorganized, corral-free, seeding-free start. Some aid stations were light on volunteers. Unpredictable weather at this time of year. Minimal food selection at finish area (bagels and bananas), although ample. Leading marathoners had to run through half-marathoners at the finish - could have been prevented with better coning in last mile. Half-marathon course is probably long. Proprietary timing chips with ankle straps. Few spectators; relatively little support from local residents. Incorrect timing data on the website after the race, and no email contact provided for corrections. Overall, though, a promising race.
4.0

By: Bobby V.

Posted: March 25, 2007

Challenging but scenic course

I am a flat-lander, so the hills were very challenging, especially late in the race. But who could ask for a more beautiful place to run than our nation's capital?!?! Pros: The race organization was great. It was very easy to get to the race on the metro or by auto. The course was very scenic and traveled through all parts of the city. There were no really boring points but there were MANY interesting sights. The hills presented a formidable but fair challenge to one's running ability. (See the elevation chart on the website). The volunteers, though not great in numbers, were very enthusiastic. The police were also enthusiastic and some actually cheered the runners (never saw that before at any of my 10 marathons). There were an ample number of porto-johns at the start/finish Cons: There is in need of a few more porto-johns along the course. I hope the expo will grow (it was VERY small). I would definitely recommend this marathon to anyone looking for a good mid-sized event. But be forewarned. Train for hills.
3.0

By: Charles B.

Posted: March 25, 2007

A Great Course to View DC

I was really looking forward to this marathon as a great opportunity to view the capitol. I was not disappointed in that regard. The only disappointing things were the lack of porta-johns (first one was not until mile 7.5 with a long line) and specators (there were not many places for spectators). However, the spectators that were there were excellent! Great people to brace the rain! Also, something unexpected: having a guy come up to me begging for money! Oh well! I would run this again. It made a big jump in from the 1st to the 2nd race, from what I understand. Kudos to the organizers, as I cannot imagine what a difficult thing it is to organize something like this in the middle of DC.
3.0

By: Dave E.

Posted: March 25, 2007

As spectacular as the District itself.

Year #2, 2007. Keith Dowling and the DC Sports Alliance, you all ROCK!!! What a difference a year makes. You all did it. Wow!!! And the Mayor of DC running too. That is support. Where else can you see all of DC in 4 hours, or so? This is a great race.
4.0

By: Connie K.

Posted: March 24, 2007

Very disappointed in the route/course

Everything about the half marathon has the makings of becoming a great race - however, marking the course exactly is critical and I was downright crushed to find out the last mile of the half was off by 1/4 of a mile when I traveled from Texas to run this course for a potential PR. What a total letdown.... I am still waiting to hear from the race director to find out how this possibly could have happened.
3.0

By: Greg M.

Posted: March 24, 2007

Great little marathon in DC

Normally my girlfriend and I would have done the Marine Corps Marathon, but my girlfriend and I do the NYC Marathon each fall, so we decided to do this as a spring DC marathon, and we had a great time. You can sense the organizers are trying hard being that this was the second year. The course was nice, and while there weren't many spectactors, they were really great in spirit. The cherry on the cake, though, was at the end when we needed to get a cab to get back to our hotel; the head of the Greater Washington Sports Alliance insisted on driving us there himself - now that's Southern hospitality. :)
4.0

By: Douglas Harpel

Posted: March 24, 2007

Great job! National Marathon is here to stay.

National Marathon race organizers took note of their inaugural year glitches and can be proud of their 2007 event. A better start/finish, amenities and improved course route (all in D.C.) made for a much better race - with about twice as many entrants as 2006. The steep "Calvert Climb" in beautiful Rock Creek Park, while advertised, was nonetheless most unwelcome between miles 19-20. Any way to work out this hill would be much appreciated. This said, the final few miles are generally downhill, which is nice. The medal and T-shirt feature the new sponsor a bit too prominently, but that's the price of having a sponsor for a race that deserves to continue. I'll be back next year!
4.0

By: Jimm O.

Posted: March 24, 2007

It was a long day.

Well the day started very early. That happens with a 7 a.m. race start and us runners understand that, but the problem was that the website didn't explain well how to get to the event due to the road closers. Now other marathons in DC rectify this issue by encouraging their runner to use the metro; at the National Marathon, unless you live in DC or got a hotel room, the metro trip would have made you late for the start. Besides the website issues and silly logistical issues, the organizers also had a problem with the finishing results. I can forgive a lot, but after putting in the work to get (what I think was) a good time and you don't even get to see it except on your watch. It is just heart-breaking. Overall the course was a fun - and the people on the course worked hard, and I thank them - but the organization leaves a lot to be desired. I do not recommend this race.
2.0

By: Chris H.

Posted: March 24, 2007

Well administered race that showcases the city

This was a very well run race! They showcased the city very well - they added a cool "Heartbreak Hill" of our own, there was excellent police protection on every side street, neighborhoods were fun and supportive and there was plenty of water and Gatorade all around. I loved the clear race times at about every mile - the clear mile markers. Packet pickup was fast - I was out of there in 4 minutes. Plenty of bathrooms at the start. The bag drop off team had their stuff together - fast to get your bag in (flexible on types of bags) and fast on retrieval. Medal was cool. Nice job on the weather, too! You start off running towards the capitol building, you see the navy yard, all the museums, the botanical gardens and many monuments. You run through beautiful Rock Creek Park, the Potomac by the Kennedy Center and along the Anacostia Riverfront. You run through great neighborhoods - H Street Corridor and the Connecticut Ave./Calvert St. and Adams Morgan neighborhoods. It was terrific. You've gotta love it when the mayor runs the full marathon, too!
5.0

By: Charli L.

Posted: March 24, 2007

Wonderful urban race course/organization

I ran the half and I will definitely be back next year. There are so many things that were done right, I'll just list them: - free parking on race day and at the expo - expo near a major highway on/off ramp for quick access - enthusiastic volunteers, with well stocked stations - DC police did a FANTASTIC job at holding back the traffic - course goes by the monuments and the nitty gritty neighborhoods of the city - technical shirt There were only 2 "cons": 1. No porta-potties on the entire half course until about mile 12.5.... At that point the finish is practically visible. 2. We were repeatedly told that the metro would not be running in time to use it to get to the start. Late the night before, however, the metro announced it would start running at 6 a.m. It was a great size race, and we had perfect weather, in my opinion (overcast and 50s). I want this race to take off, but then again I don't. I liked it much better than the Marine Corps Marathon. In short, if you want the race party atmosphere, do MCM in the fall. If you want a challenging race that highlights the best and worst of this city, run the National Marathon/Half.
4.0

By: Jessica N.

Posted: March 24, 2007

Nice but still needs work

A challenging course with lots of hills in the second half of the half-marathon. (According to my Garmin, the course ran 13.52 miles. I talked to several other folks with Garmins, and they had the same reading I did.) Aid stations were well staffed and supplied. Suggestions include: more accessible place for packet pick-up (I learned to use the Metro), more garbage cans on site, and better mapping of the course.
4.0

By: Anne P.

Posted: April 21, 2006

Nice first attempt...

I was injured and ran the HALF marathon instead of the full marathon; so my comments are limited to the first half of the course - or at least, somewhere around mile 11-12 when we split off from the full marathoners. I did like the first half of the course, except that I found the long stretch of M Street through SW and SE to be rather desolate and boring. I understand that the folks who ran the whole distance encountered rougher terrain. I thought the race director did a really admirable job. DC does not make it easy to put on a major race, which is unfortunate, especially since DC wanted to be in the running as an Olympic host city. I feel the mayor could have been more supportive of the race in advance, although I was glad to see him come to the start. The police were great that day - they were doing their public safety job and being cheerleaders at the same time. I give the organizers high marks for allowing people like me who lost their entry fees from the cancelled DC Marathon a couple years ago have complimentary admissions. Even though the National Marathon was in NO way affiliated with that cancelled marathon, I thought that was an unexpected and pleasant way to have folks think about running a DC marathon again. I don't think this marathon can compete with the Marine Corps Marathon (which I've run three times so far), but I don't think it is meant to. The Marine Corps Marathon is a very different kind of race.
4.0

By: Guy M.

Posted: April 18, 2006

A solid first effort to build on for 2007

The race: DC had a spring marathon until 2003 when the race imploded due to organizational problems. Although area runners wanted another spring marathon, everyone knew how daunting the task would be to bring one back to DC. Congratulations to the city and the race director for taking on a snake-bitten challenge and pulling it off. They focused on the basics - support the runners, give them a challenging course, water-stops, security, good medical attention and the beginning of new support from communities east of the Capitol. Things like the expo, goodie bags, music, bands, shirts, tons of food, cheerleaders and balloons - they certainly weren't at the level of a major marathon, but I didn't expect it and didn't mind because the basics were done right. The course was challenging, but it was also no secret. The elevations were there on the website all winter long. As it was, I didn't fully "appreciate" them until running them in the race, but it gave me a life lesson for all future races - train for the race course! The support from the volunteers was great, and the police directing traffic were top-notch. During the second half of the race there were some long traffic back-ups and the compliments and support by drivers watching the runners far outnumbered the few frustrated drivers in their cars. It was kind of fun for runners to actually have the right-of-way in their favor for a change! Suggestions/improvements for next year: If you're sticking with RFK Stadium, let us start and finish in the stadium; add more portable toilets at the start; and note that the two-mile section in the park right after the half-marathoners turn off the course was truly desolate. If you keep the hills next year, I'll be ready! I liked the idea of the qualifying time as well.... I think over 93% of the runners finished in under 5 hours, a great effort for a challenging race! The bar has been set for high expectations in 2007
4.0

By: Angelo W.

Posted: April 11, 2006

Challenging Course, great for Racing

This is not a course for a PR. The race director is an elite marathoner and designed the course for racing elite marathoners. The last 10k literally has one turn with long and challenging up and downhills. This was only a training run for me so when I got to the last 10k, it was fun to pass people. I could envision DC hosting an Olympic Trials on this course and watching the greats duke it out down the last 10k. This course is better than the loop course at the 2004 Olympic Trials in Birmingham, which the RD raced in. Because of the great police presence and cones, traffic was NEVER a safety issue for me. There was plenty of room to maneuver and I appreciate going to sections of DC and PG County I had never seen. Hopefully in 2008, I will get to run the same course right by the new Nationals baseball stadium.
5.0

By: Roeland V.

Posted: April 09, 2006

Excellent event. Deserves to grow in popularity.

I had fun participating in this event. It was the first time for this event, so there is still room for growth in several areas (numbers of participants, number of spectators, etc.). However, overall the course was nice and varied and the organization was excellent. I really have no quibbles with any aspect of this race. I loved the logisitical simplicity of being able to park close to the start, and having the start and finish in the same place. I would enjoy running this race again.
4.0

By: Charlie C.

Posted: April 06, 2006

not TOO hilly--just challenging

The hills were challenging but the downhills were rolling--let me recover well between hills. I liked the course-it was a good mixture of terrain and scenery. I can compare it to Richmond, Charlottesville, Baltimore and Atlanta (half)--the hill were easier on me in DC. i'm not fast, but I finished well even though I ran the Shamrock Marathon the Sunday before this. Good job to the directors! My only complaint was I needed better directions to find RFK in the dark Fri. night, and again Sat. AM. The race was beginning as I got out of my car in the parking lot. I guess I ran 26.5 that day... The police were great in helping me find the stadium, and they were great support along the course.
4.0

By: Rachel P.

Posted: April 04, 2006

Change course and the cops were heros!

The race organizers handed the half-marathoners a beautiful course through Capitol Hill and the new baseball stadium area. However, full marathoners had to contend with angry residents and nasty hills in deep Anacostia and PG County. DC needs a spring marathon and I want to support the National Marathon.... However, please make it easier for me to lend my support next year - change the course to two loops of the half. By the way - the police officers deserve a huge round of applause. They provided cheers at every turn and kept the angry residents away from me!
2.0

By: Craig S.

Posted: April 02, 2006

tougher course than looks on paper

Those unprepared will be broken on miles 10-15 and left in the dust on miles 20-26.2. The hills are tougher than they look on paper. I loved it personally and had good negative splits - passed about 150 people after the halfway point.
3.0

By: Marty Wrin

Posted: March 31, 2006

Okay for their first attempt

This marathon seemed to have a good set of sponsors and organizers, so I was expecting everything to be "spot-on" despite it being the first year. If they could take the course and post-race set-up (except for bag check) from the Washington Marathon and combine it with the current team organizing and backing the National Marathon, I think that would be a winning combination. I know that course was a problem for churches, so the Saturday running would be perfect for addressing that problem. The course was so much nicer, lots more of DC and DC neighborhoods and no big traffic jams!
3.0

By: Kate A.

Posted: March 31, 2006

excellent half marathon course

This was a well organized event, particularly for a first time marathon, with the exception of the lack of porta-potties and the spotty post-race food. I ran the half due to my concerns about the hills/traffic issues in PG County and judging from the other comments, those were indeed problems. The half marathon course was challenging and scenic with an excellent finish. I hope to run this race next year, and if they alter the route, will try the full marathon. I think the organizers should keep the qualifying times - no offense to race walkers and slower runners, but they do choke up the course quite a bit (not to mention the safety concerns with keeping the course open until all runners/walkers are in). It was nice to run with a faster pack.
4.0

By: dave w.

Posted: March 29, 2006

good first-time event with a challenging course

I give this event 1.5 "thumbs up." Plus: Challenging course - one of the toughest city marathons I've run with many rolling hills between miles 11 and 24 giving "no rest for the weary," but I think a challenging course can make for a good marathon if you are prepared (note - the race publicity clearly spelled out the nature of the course, so it was no surprise). Well-spaced water stops and enthusiastic volunteers at water stations, especially in Capitol/District Heights. Excellent course security with lots of volunteers and friendly police support (important given the traffic issues noted below). Easy access to starting area by car (once I figured how to get into the lot which wasn't obvious or clearly marked), easy packet pick-up, good finish line crew. Neutral: Spectators were relatively sparsely distributed. Those I recall being along the course were supportive. Crowds aren't important to me, so I gave a "4" for this category. Minus: Traffic jams in PG County - no direct danger to runners, but not a good feeling to run past miles of unhappy motorists. This needs to be corrected to make the National Marathon a "keeper." Summary: I'll come back again for an early season challenge if the course is somehow changed to avoid causing major traffic problems. Overall, I had a positive experience and I thank the organizers for putting on this event.
4.0

By: Slow Joe Vasil

Posted: March 29, 2006

Not bad, will get better

I have read some complaints about the course which I find to be somewhat unfair considering that the elevation chart was available for review prior to the race. It was definitely a difficult course, but it was not impossible, and runners should always do their homework to find the right marathon. If you are unsure of the course, email the organizers before entering. You can tell the race director poured his heart and soul into this, and over time, it will get better. It was very well organized for an inaugural, and the most important things were done right (hydration, accurate course description, keeping traffic off the road). The course was very well marked at nearly every mile. There could have been more of a selection of post-race food, but as this race grows and the cash flow improves, that will happen. They made one mistake on my finishing time, but the problem was corrected within 1 1/2 days and reposted after I notified them. They acknowledged me immediately, so they were very responsive. Yes, there is room for improvement, but overall, it was a nice race.
4.0

By: John K.

Posted: March 29, 2006

Good Start. Room to Grow.

It was nice to see a spring marathon in DC again. I'm guessing many things were compromised due to the debacle of 2003. There were no blank checks like the folks at H2O may have had. Yet the organizers pulled off a very good 1st-time marathon. The hills were as advertised on the webpage elevation maps. They're always bigger in person, but this should not have been a surprise. And what better way to end a race than looking up and seeing RFK Stadium with the Capitol and Washington Monument in the background. Parking couldn't get much easier. The mile markers were easily visible and helped pull you to the finish. The limited spectators make up for numbers with enthusiasm and I was even cheered by people stuck in the traffic. What I didn't know was that DC had a beautiful park in it. Ft. Dupont Park was a nice change of scenery despite it all being uphill. : ) I'm looking forward to this becoming an annual event in my race calendar!
4.0

By: Keith Whited

Posted: March 29, 2006

Some Room for Improvement but a Great First Try!

I'll not write a dissertation since MOST of the comments already written provide an accurate depiction of this event - both the good points as well as those that could use some improvement. There are clearly a few writers with "issues" and I would strongly suggest that you take their comments with "a grain of salt!" One report came from a person claiming to have run 50+ marathons. The closest he came to having anything good to say about the marathon was, "The sparse crowds that were out do deserve some praise." Unless he has run the same few marathons over and over again, I can't imagine that he hasn't run far poorer marathons than this. Having run a total of 53 marathons myself (41 DIFFERENT marathons) I can quickly name at least a dozen that were far worse than this one - and most of them don't have the excuse of being an "inaugural." He even complained about the medal which I would rate above average. If he wants to complain about "cheap medals," he should pull out a few of his Marine Corps Marathon medals...! Another person says they felt "UNSAFE" in Anacostia. True, I wouldn't necessarily want to stroll around Anacostia alone after dark, but at no time did I feel unsafe or threatened during the race. Also, while there were severe traffic back-ups, I found the drivers to be surprisingly PLEASANT considering the major inconvenience they were experiencing. I've run races in other cities on SUNDAY mornings and been cursed at by drivers who we were causing to be late for church!!! I personally experienced none of that in this marathon. I believe the organizers primary fault was timing. The N.M. was scheduled just BEFORE the Cherry Blossom 10-Miler, which is one of the DC areas biggest races. Few people want to run a marathon immediately prior to a major 10-mile race. Hence, they had fewer runners than expected. This squeezed their budget and few corners had to to be cut. Yes, there's room for improvement but I give the organizers a BIG THUMBS UP for an inaugural event. Good chance that I'll be back next year!!!
4.0

By: Frank L.

Posted: March 28, 2006

Great First Effort

I'm not sure if some of these folks ran the same marathon as I did! Was this race perfect? Well, no... but what first marathon ever is? First, the parts they may want to consider working on for next year: 1)The crowds were sparse in the second half, and the section of the city was not nearly a beautiful as the first half. I did feel bad for the folks driving and stuck in the traffic backup the race caused (but I saw very few folks angry... in fact, I was surprised at the number cheering me on!) 2) More bathrooms at the start. But most things were REALLY nice! 1. Traffic control for the runners was wonderful. I normally don't see the police cheering runners, but most did here! I think the police were tops! 2. Water stops were plentiful, well run, had plenty of fluids and gel and were VERY enthusiatic! They definitely picked up my spirits! Great volunteers!! As a "back-of-the-packer," I'm sure many really wanted to get home, but I couldn't believe their spirit!!!! Thank you guys! 3. Race organization was fantastic... everything ran smoothly and I felt like nothing important was overlooked. Great job! 4. I liked the course a lot. We got to see both the beautiful and the not so beautiful... and I believe Washington DC is a blend of both. 5. While the course was definitely not an easy one, there are plenty of marathons that have more challenging hills. So you probably won't run a PR! Flat courses are many times boring. This was not! Great job for the first year and I'll bet next year will be fantastic!
4.0

By: Denise K.

Posted: March 28, 2006

Tremendous!!!

This was an excellent marathon for its first running. Obviously the race director put in a great deal of thought and effort. The aid stations and the volunteers were great. It seemed as though we were offered water, Gatorade or some kind of food every couple of feet. There were definitely more volunteers than runners (yes, so much encouragement!!). The first 6 miles of the course were inspiring and if you planned it right you could use the down (and up) hills to lengthen your stride and pick up the pace (change of muscle groups). To the race directo: I really hope you run this race again and more runners attend. The way this race was handled it could easily handle at least 6,000 runners. Thanks for a great weekend and a new favorite marathon. PS. Run... New York and Boston, then come run a truly enjoyable stress-free race in a great city.
5.0

By: Jane D.

Posted: March 28, 2006

Good but challenging marathon.

R. T. from DC and anyone else whining about this marathon needs to grow up. It was hilly - just like the elevation map said it would be. It was small, just like the pre-registration reports indicated it would be. The crowds were small but mighty. If you run to have people clap for you, run around your house so your family can do it. I heard not one ill word from parked motorists - but expected to. I was shocked that folks got out of their cars and cheered for us. The exhaust and backed up traffic were unfortunate, but not unheard of (try Dublin, Ireland for instance). Ditto the finish line food - do you run 26.2 for the FOOD? Get over it. I thought the organizers did a decent job on their first try. I'm sure they'll strive for better in 2007 and I wish them good luck.
4.0

By: Spencer Whibley

Posted: March 28, 2006

Enjoyed the varying slope course

Pre-race. I took note of the hilly second half of the course on the marathon website. Good driving directions from the National Airport, but a little confusion to reach Parking Lot 7, the site of the expo and race packet pickup. We and others initially went to Parking Lot 8. As others have said, there was a need for more toilets at the race start. Race. The first half was more scenic, because of the public buildings and wide streets. I was told that the second half went through deprived areas. The houses looked in good condition and any social problems were not apparent. The fan support was few and enthusiastic, with the majority of the local population disengaged. There were large traffic jams for the second half. Several drivers were encouraging and I saw no hostility towards the runners. (I try to thank the police officers, volunteers and supporters as I run.) The water/Gatorade/GU and toilet stops were numerous and adequately spaced apart for me. I used the many mile indicators and relished the hilly slopes. Post-race. The provided drinks and food (bananas and salty bagels), medal and T-shirt were satisfactory. Apart from the mentioned few toilets, the facilities were good. Conclusion. Hearty congratulations to the organizers, volunteers, participants and everyone involved. This race will improve with popularity. I enjoyed the varying slope course and fully recommend the event. For the future, I suggest that the volunteers on bicycles are given a reference booklet with the toilet stops and hills marked to better answer the runners. Clothes banks could be provided for the first few miles, because the quantity of discarded clothing on the road was an embarrassment. My thanks to other MarathonGuide.com correspondents.
4.0

By: JImmy Dean

Posted: March 28, 2006

Stop Complaining and Run

A few thoughts on this race: 1st: To all the complainers about how tough the course is, suck it up and run. If you want a flat course... run on a treadmill. (By the way, the male winner of the race had previously set the world record for running a marathon on a treadmill.) 2nd: The volunteers, cops, and what spectators were there were awesome, especially in staying positive with the traffic backups. 3rd: To the organizers... improvements for next year: More bathrooms both at the start and on the course, better post-race food (keep the beer truck for next year!), and run a bit more into downtown. But KEEP THE HILLS... they are a blast!
4.0

By: Thomas B.

Posted: March 28, 2006

Run the half; skip the full

I ran the full and set a PR, so do not take this as sour grapes but, in short, the full course sucks. The first six miles are flat and nice if you are into scenery (capitol, Mall, etc.). Miles 6-11 are flat but tour some pretty tough neighborhoods. Miles 11-26 are hilly and also in pretty unsavory neighborhoods. The hills on miles 21-25 are brutal. I would not run this race again unless I were local. The logisitics are too tough for travelers (no hotels close to the start or finish; no mass transit due to the early start). But, on the good side, the few fans who were there cheered enthusiastically and the race organization (water stops, registration) was top-notch.
3.0

By: Myriam L.

Posted: March 28, 2006

Needs lots of work

The on-course support and volunteers were great and the water stations well stocked with Gatorade. The gels were a nice touch. The last hilly miles need more water stations. One every 2 1/2 miles is not enough. The map did not seem to reflect the severity of the hills from mile 20 to 25. In fact, I was expecting a descent! The post-race refreshments and food were pathetic. After 4 hours, there was nothing left but bananas and two girls apologizing profusely for not having any more food to give me. How do you run out of bagels when pre-registration gives you a very good count of what to expect is beyond me. Overall, I give a thumbs way up to the volunteers and the few spectators that came out to cheer but thumbs down to the non-existent expo, hilly course and the lack of food at the finish.
2.0

By: Matt B.

Posted: March 28, 2006

good first marathon

It was my first marathon, so I don't have another one to compare this race to. I enjoyed the course and thought it was well-organized. It would have been nice if more people were there to cheer us on, but I still had fun.
4.0

By: Andy H.

Posted: March 28, 2006

Challenging Spring Marathon

The race director's assessment of the course - which mixed flat, fast segments with hilly challenging ones - was absolutely accurate. The hills through the second half of the race made for a very challenging race. The course was well marked, volunteers were abundant, and the weather could not have been better; although the course took its toll on me, I had a great time. I hope the race can expand in the future. That might provide a bigger/better expo and improved refreshments at the finish.
3.0

By: The Preacher

Posted: March 27, 2006

Fantastic to run through Washington

I really enjoyed this marathon. To run through the city with so much history and current events was fantastic. The organization was not fancy but is was well done in all respects. It had all one could require for a marathon. The logistics were great. I could park within 50 yards of the start and finish. No problem. Aid on the course was as good as one could need. I am just sad that no more runners were there to enjoy this event. To the organizers - keep up the good work.
4.0

By: Donna R.

Posted: March 27, 2006

unorganized and unsafe

Small, first-time, unorganized, streets were UNSAFE in Anacostia, uncomfortable, too hilly, too much traffic, and a very small spectator crowd.
1.0

By: Darry D.

Posted: March 27, 2006

Want some hills? Run DC!

I never thought a town as flat as DC could have so many hills! And 75% come in the last 6 miles. If you're up for the challenge I hope they run this next year. For a first-year race, the events other than the run could have been better, but the course support was great and the fans/cops were very friendly.... I advise not driving the course at night however.
4.0

By: Rob T.

Posted: March 27, 2006

A National Scourge

If there's one place in the United States where you aren't actually in a "state," it's Washington, D.C. And if there's one city in the United States that can't organize a decent marathon, it's.... Well, you get the picture. Not surprisingly, security concerns and general city reluctance make a race in D.C. a difficult one to manage. But each race in the nation's capital seems to be centered around the fact that "Ooohh! It's the capitol!" or "Look! There's the Washington Monument!" while basic things like general race sensibilities take a back seat. I know. I've dealt with the madhouse conditions of the Marine Corps Marathon multiple times, and ran the ill-fated inaugural Washington D.C. Marathon before the seams quickly burst. I live, run, and work in the area. I should have known this one would be no different. The packet pickup was held under a tent in a stadium parking lot on the opposite side of the stadium from the mass transit station; it was an effort to get to a place that could have been held on a street corner. You don't need a stadium parking lot to have a table of bibs, a table for chips and some commemorative merchandise. Trust me, things don't get any better once the race starts. With the race beginning before mass transit opens, and no hotels within safe distance, the only option to the start is in a gas-guzzler, and then you snake through parking lots or cross traffic. The start is a one-mile loop around the exterior of the stadium. The end is in the parking lot of the stadium. The race was clearly so strapped for cash that they cut back on port-a-potties, delaying the start while throngs waited their turn in line for the restroom. And in the words of Karen Carpenter, we've only just begun. Taking you through some of the most depressing and desolate areas of any marathon course, the last 20 miles of the route don't offer inspiration close at hand. The monuments, the memorials, the cottony cherry blossoms? You'll be done with them in the first 10K. After that, you'll be treated to plenty of desolation, plenty of hills, and we're just getting started. The race course, which happens to block several major thoroughfares, created backups rivaling those of Thanksgiving weekend. There was a two-mile backup, and another four-mile backup, with only a small grassy median separating you from angry drivers who wished you nothing but the worst. "Fall!," "Stop walking!" and "Stupid runners!" were only some of the things that were shouted from car windows, except I've left off the bitter four-letter words that accompanied nearly all of them. The bigger backup came on a series of demoralizing hills, a painful dose of ups and downs for the last six miles. No sooner had you conquered a hill and headed down the opposite side than you saw the next rise coming straight at you. Meanwhile, you're breathing car exhaust and listening to drivers curse you out. It's a lethal combination. Then there's the little issue with water stops, a potential calamity the race was spared because it was a surprisingly chilly spring day in Washington and not one of those early-spring scorchers. You might get through the 2-1/4 mile break between water stops from mile 4.2 to 6.5, and the even more dreadful 2-1/2 mile break between water stops from mile 12.75 to 15.4, but the best (?) is yet to come and you better pray the sun stays behind the clouds. The last five miles of the course had exactly two water stops - one at mile 23, the last at mile 25. And when you're all said and done, in the parking lot, as I mentioned earlier, you get a surprisingly cheap medal, bananas and bagels, and age awards in 10-year increments. If the last 10 miles failed to leave a stinking taste in your mouth, this pathetic ending sure will. The sparse crowds that were out do deserve some praise, and the police officers deserve hazard pay for keeping the runners safe while angry drivers peppered them with curses. The organizers, however, deserve no such commendation. I guess we should be happy that they didn't run off with the entry fees like the last D.C. Marathon organizers did. No bonus for being honest. They still deserve a rousing thumbs down. If you want an enjoyable spring marathon, there are plenty to choose from. And if you still want to come to Washington, D.C. next March, you will have a much better time sitting by the tidal basin, taking in the cherry blossoms. Those are a national treasure. The National Marathon, however, is a languishing bud that deserves to wither on the vine.
1.0

By: John S.

Posted: March 27, 2006

Not a bad experience for a first marathon

Going into my first marathon, I heard a ton from more experienced runners that this was the most disorganized inaugural marathon they'd ever seen. Aside from the major issues with the port-a-potties at the start, I couldn't disagree more. The water stops were plentiful and the volunteers were great. Then again, this could have been the worst marathon ever put together, and me being a newbie, I would never know. Overall, I give the event organization, the course, etc., a solid B or B+. The only major drawback was the lack of fan support, though this being the first year of the race, I reckon that is to be expected. I also never realized that there were so many hills in PGC, and given the number of runners absolutely staggering towards the last five or six miles, I'm guessing a lot of people didn't realize it either. I had a blast, and I'd recommend the race to anybody else (assuming they have it next year).
3.0

By: John G.

Posted: March 27, 2006

Change the course or the race will fail.

Gorgeous day, beautiful city, great first effort. BUT... miles 11-21 are so hard, with hill after hill after hill, that it almost makes me cry thinking about it. I think running 26.2 is a great accomplishment, and I don't need or want the hassle of hills. After 50+ marathons, this is the worst/hilliest course I have ever seen. I will not do it again until the course is changed.
3.0

By: Ron N.

Posted: March 27, 2006

Not bad for first year

The registration/start/finish area was a bit disorganized. There weren't enough porto-lets and the post-race food consisted solely of bananas (race management: please have something with salt at the end of the race). Once the race started the on-course logistics were well done. The course was well marked and marshaled. The aid stations were well done (the guys chasing around getting runners the right flavor gels at the gel distribution point were exceptional). Police (esp. PG County) did a great job from the runners' standpoint at traffic control (even for us back-of-packers). The spectators were a bit thin, lots of encouragement from the woman who was creeping along in traffic next to me on Central Ave. I was prepared for the big hills at the marathon halfway point. What I wasn't prepared for were the continual heartbreaker hills from mile 20 to the finish.
3.0

By: David Trevino

Posted: March 27, 2006

WOW - what a course!

First, I would like to just say that this marathon was probably the most challenging of all the other marathons that I have done up-to-date. But, in my opinion, it was a great course. And, for those who came out to encourage the runners - thank you. The Maryland police officers were also very supportive. As this was the inaugural marathon for the nation's capital, there is a lot of promise that this will develop into a top marathon event as years go by; I'm just happy that I was able to run in the 1st National Marathon. I felt that there could have been a few more post refreshments after the marathon, especially with all the hills that all the runners had to take on. I would highly recommend this course to other runners, but my advice before you do: make sure you incorporate "hill repeats" into your training program. Being a local resident, I plan to make this and the Marine Corps Marathon my yearly marathon events - I will definitely be back next year.
5.0

By: Ramona V.

Posted: March 26, 2006

Great Volunteers

I expected this to be a much bigger race than it turned out to be! The lines at the porta-potties at the start where huge!!! About four times as many would have been great! Almost no spectators, but great volunteers. Their enthusiasm made up for everything. Great potential but will never rival the Marine Corps!
2.0

By: Dave E.

Posted: March 26, 2006

Mark your calendars for spring 2007.

Wow!!! What a cool experience. The inaugural run of the National Marathon was a great experience. All the volunteers, Bob Sweeny and Keith Dowling did what it takes to make this a great event, just like the city and metro area that hosted it. The course was as described - a nice run through DC then on to the suburbs and the challenges of a diverse course. I finished well and I look forward to running this marathon again next year (2007). I believe everyone enjoyed themselves participating here. Dave NYC
3.0

By: Anthony R.

Posted: March 26, 2006

Good Inaugural Marathon

This was a good marathon that has the potential of being a great one. Running through the city for the first 6 or 7 miles was a wonderful experience. The course was challenging, but not overly difficult. Given that this was a first, I was surprised at the number of volunteers and spectators along the way. Absolutely great job by the volunteers! While the organization was pretty good, there could have been more snack and drink options at the finish. Also, it may make sense to run this a week or two later when the blossoms are in full bloom and the Nationals are playing. Do it in combination with the cherry blossoms and a Nationals' game... as Boston is done in combination with Patriot's Day and a Red Sox game. There's a lot of potential here. I'm glad I was part of it!
4.0

By: Terry N.

Posted: March 26, 2006

Unpredictable water stations; what porta-potties?

For an inaugural event, clearly there is lots to learn. Expo was small but the registration/packet pickup was well organized. Water stations though well supported by volunteers were in unpredictable places. I swear we went from mile 13 to 16 without one. They said the second half of the course was challenging; it was tough.
3.0

By: Tim Cohn

Posted: March 26, 2006

Wonderful race.

The course first takes you through well-known sections of DC (capitol; White House; etc.), then visits lovely neighborhoods to the east of the Anacostia River, including a wonderful run through Fort Dupont Park. The terrain becomes hilly after mile 11. However, the spectators - particularly in PG County - were wonderful. The course organizers are doubtless going to have to respond to complaints about traffic problems the race created; cars were backed up at almost every intersection. However, the police handled this very well, and even made the effort to cheer on the runners. Overall, an excellent course, very well managed.
4.0

By: Douglas Harpel

Posted: March 26, 2006

Great First Run for the National Marathon

Hats off to the organizers of the inaugural National Marathon. While the race failed to attract the number of runners anticipated (wanted 5,000, drew 800 due primarily to prequalification time requirements and an unfair public association with the aborted Washington Marathon), it went off without a hitch. The course itself - which flat over the first half and had hill after hill over the second - was well marked and had plenty of water/Gatorade stations; more than a few offered gel as well. Volunteers and traffic coordination were exceptional, particularly given the small size of the field. Race T-shirt and finisher's medal were average and the post-race food left room for improvement. I can recommend this to others and hope that next March brings a second running.
3.0

By: Jerry K.

Posted: March 26, 2006

Course

The course was very challenging!! There were a lot of hills. I would not recommend this marathon for a first-time runner because of its challenges.
3.0

By: Eric G.

Posted: March 25, 2006

Overall... a good experience.

This was my second marathon... my first was NYC last year. I would rate the overall experience as positive and would recommend this race to anyone wanting to run a challenging course. The Course: The course is flat with only a few gentle hills for about the first 11 miles. The first 10 miles of the race takes you past many great landmarks of DC (the capitol, The Mall and all of its museums, L'Enfant Plaza, and the Navy Yard). At the 11 mile-marker the race divides into two... those running the full marathon and those running the half. By this time you are in suburban parts of DC, so there aren't many scenic things to see other than neighborhoods and little strip malls. At about mile 14, the race takes on a new personality, the hills get longer and steeper and there are what seem like only a few short declines or flat parts. Even then, you can still see the next hill staring right at you. The toughest part of the course came at about mile 19 to 20, where there was a long, steady and steep incline. This is where I started slowing down, because it didn't get much better until the last mile or so. Organization: For being an inaugural event, everything seemed to run smoothly. There were ample water/Gatorade stations, as well as gel packs at at least three of the stations. The volunteers were all responsive and encouraging and you never really felt alone on the course, either with staff or with other runners. Post-race events seemed to be well maintained. They had an adequate assortment of food and drinks available... bananas, bagels, water, and Gatorade. A little more variety would have been nice, but there was no waiting, so I won't complain. (Rumor has it that they had more stuff, but I would imagine the half-marathoners got to it first). They also had many activities for kids and families to do while waiting (ball crawls... things like that). The medals were great and the pre-race pack was o.k. The shirt was one of the Dri-Fit t-shirts, short-sleeved. Kinda busy on the back with all of the sponsers, but nice. Fans: Not many... but my only comparison is NYC. The ones that were out were very supportive. Overall: This was a good race with lots of potential. There were only about 2,200 runners (they anticipated 5,000) and most were in the half-marathon. There was a qualifying time of 4:30:00 for the marathon, so that probably has a lot to do with it. The course is challenging... even more so than NYC, so I would recommend doing hard hill training. I had studied the course elevation charts and they didn't seem to be accurate, but that may have to do with my limited experience. Regardless, the hills are steep and they come at the end of the course... right where most runners hit their "wall," so be prepared. If you want to just get a nice tour of DC, I would suggest only doing the half marathon.
4.0

By: Raoul G.

Posted: March 25, 2006

Inaugural event that needs more organization.

Pre-race: Registration was easy enough and cost was in line with other similar marathons. Packet pickup was ok, not much of an expo - but expect it to grow in the future. T-shirt was fair - expect a little more from this part of the U.S. Race day: Not having access to the metro to get to RFK was bad! This should be a priority to change. Directions to parking lot shouldn't have routed people in front of the armory - police didn't seem to know what was going on at first. Definitely a shortage of porta-potties - ended up starting about 2 minutes late and had to work through all runners. Bag check worked fine. Race: First half of the course was ok. The last half was poorly routed - mainly because of traffic jams; felt like people waiting in their cars would be getting hostile/violent towards runners. Not good for future community race support. But police seemed to be handling it as best as they could. Bad accident at one intersection - ugh! Hope no one was hurt. Water stops were good, well stocked and knowledgeable volunteers. Appreciated several locations for gel. Mile markers were very visible. Plenty of course volunteers riding by on bikes checking runners. Didn't need any medical help - but they were very visible. Finish line was easy to find and routing through to post-race food, etc. went fine. Post-race food was ok, but would be nice to get some more variety in the future. Finisher's medal was ok - nothing distinctive. Results were online quickly.
2.0

By: Rhea B.

Posted: March 25, 2006

Scenic and challenging course; great volunteers

Scenic course through downtown DC to some of the monuments and the Ellipse. At mile 11, the half-marathoners veered off to end their route, and the marathoners started climbing steep hills - at least 3 or 4 big ones between miles 11.5 and 17, when we were in Prince George's Co. The rest of the course was rolling, with lots of long gradual hills and descents. Excellent water/Gatorade/Gu support by enthusiastic volunteers. I only wish there were more spectators to cheer us on. Granted, this was the inaugural running of this race, so it doesn't have the tradition or cache of the Marine Corps Marathon - yet. Also, there was lots of snarled traffic in PG and some irate motorists. However, road closures have been announced for weeks in the news and on signs along the road. I highly recommend this race!
3.0

By: Dane Rauschenberg

Posted: March 25, 2006

Good in spite of the gloom and doom

Was the second half of this marathon one of the more challenging of the 24 marathons I have ever run? Sure was! Do I hope they change the course some next year? Sure do! Do I think they will need to to even have one next year? Without a doubt. But here are my thoughts. 1. Every race can't be a personal best. People still run Leadville knowing they will be lucky to run under 4 hours. 2. I have no problem with the time limit that was set, as it is nice to run a race with a fair number of people who are solid runners and are there to have fun, but also to put up some impressive times. 3. No, the race course did not go through some of the most scenic parts of DC (the Anacostia section of DC is well-known for not being upper class at all) but the specators came out in very good numbers on an early Saturday morning to cheer on the specators. I wish they all read this recap so I could say thank you to them. 4. I would not want to try and coordinate a 26.2-mile race in the greater D.C. area... no way, no how. 5. To those stuck in traffic that was blocked for the final six miles: I am sorry but I am sure you were given ample warning and swearing at runners as they go by will not help. But those were in the minority, and thank you for those who were stuck and still cheered on strangers as they passed by. To sum up: This race needs a great deal of work, but the spirit seems to be there and hopefully it will return better next year.
3.0

By: frederick d.

Posted: March 25, 2006

fair

Marketing, marketing, marketing.... The city needs to get our local politicians behind this marathon. This needs to be promoted as a "city-wide" event. Also, with a few little tweaks (i.e., start and end the race inside RFK, sponsor neighborhood cheering sections, and organize a real expo).
2.0

By: Todd B.

Posted: March 25, 2006

Not bad for a first try, but a lot of kinks

Let me start by saying that I respect the difficulties of running a race in the nation's capital. Security, more churches than people, and a highly fussy town with little patience for the usual traffic woes caused by a marathon. That said, this run has a long way to go to make it into the run it deserves to be. The course went for 10 bloody miles (at least) in PG county (Maryland, not DC). Further, I have lived in DC for 7 years and I have never seen so many blighted neighborhoods. I understand that there is something to seeing "the real DC," but I felt like I was running through war-torn Seriavo. Additionally, there was a total dearth of porta-potties. That said, the volunteers were plentiful and very pleasant. The spectators were supportive, if a bit colorful. I will do this run again, because I know they are going to get it right, and when they do, WOW! There is no other American city as picturesque as DC, and a solid course will show that.
3.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide