By: Nancy S.
Posted: May 23, 2022
Good Way to Get CO Done
This course has less elevation changes in it than many in CO. However, it's still at altitude so, unless you live at altitude, expect it to feel tougher and be slower than your usual time. Organization was good, but there are a lot of races going on consecutively, which I'm not a big fan of (in addition to full & half, there was a relay, a 10 miler, and a 10k all on the same morning/venue). At least they didn't start at the same time haha. There's a 5k the day before- maybe they could shift the 10k & 10 miler to Saturday?? The course is okay; the highlight is running through Mile High Stadium twice. Also runs through a fire station (interesting). Otherwise standard stuff on roadways mostly. Some music and some nice spectators, great volunteers of course. 48th race marathon or longer distance for me, I recommend this race to anyone doing states that doeesn't want to seriously beat themselves up. :)
By: Gustavo G.
Posted: June 25, 2019
Challenging course but few spectators
Very well organized, from the start (with each corral having 90 seconds difference, which allow you to run confortable the first miles) to the end (very well separated from the half marathon arrival). Nice to run through the fire department station (with entusiastic firefighters cheering), and also through the Mile High stadium and the Arts and Design Academia.
I liked the course, despite the lack of spectators in some parts.
A little bit difficult to run with relayers in the narrow parts, as they go with different pace. Also with the 10 milers, that made a small 'bottle neck' when they join marathoners for the last part of the course.
Great job from the volunteers and police.
Nice expo at Mile High, and very good technical shirt, which is very comfortable to run with.
I think that they should have timing at the 13.1 mark. I agree that time splits could be better.
By: Dave M.
Posted: May 21, 2019
Extremely well organized and staffed!
The race-day coordination was extremely efficient. City Park is easy to access, the corrals and start sequence were the best I've encountered in 21 marathons and the water stops were well sequenced and staffed. For football fans, going to Mile High Stadium 3 times (once for registration and twice during the race) is awesome.
By: Justin T.
Posted: May 21, 2019
Good well run Marathon, but...
To start off the marathon is well run. Everything you would need to run it as well as possible is there. Plentiful porta-potties. More aid stations then you need, I skipped a few of them. Packet pickup was orderly. Plenty of post race goodness at the end. They have a bag drop off that I didn't use because of where I parked, more on that latter. And plenty of fellow runners so the course doesn't feel empty for us mid packers. So it was well run.
Getting there was easier then I expected. I live in Denver surrounded by the half marathon course. The half goes it's own way till about the last quarter mile. So I was expecting complications finding parking. I got out early and found a parking spot at the far end of the Zoo parking lot that was about 100 feet from where the end of the corrals are. So that was nice. Also where they tell you could be dropped off there too. It's closer then where they tell you to be dropped off if someone is driving there.
The course is not a pr course. It's not flat. It's has hills. And there is a steep one around mile 23. But the course is nice. Running down the street that Jack Kerouac made famous is interesting. Other highlights include Running though mile high, running through a fire station, Sloans Lake and the Dragons and the finish at my running home City Park.
Spectators are spread out in pockets along the course so there was long stretches with no one. West Colfax was the least supported section. But as you got on to 17th ave headed back to the park things got better.
The timing mat placement was weird. Most races put them every 5k and at halfway. In Colfax the seemed to be placed to correspond with the marathon relay so the splits in the results are not nice and even distances. The not half split was annoying.
Overall it was a good race.
By: Bill B.
Posted: May 23, 2018
Lackluster Big City Marathon
A disappointment overall. While there were definite pluses for the race, especially the excellent start/finish area in City Park, this race did not have the excitement of a big city marathon. I detected no buzz in the city prior to the race and there were few spectators until the finish area, which was very nice.
I found the water stations to be poorly organized. There was no water until mile 4, even though there seemed to be a crew of volunteers at mile 2 with no water to give. The placement of the other stations seemed haphazard and the stations seemed to be understaffed.
I found the port a potties on the course to be inadequate. Where there were toilets they were clumped together, but one had to run long distances to find them.
Finally, the course was way too narrow in spots. There was a lot of running on bike paths without much room to move. Even as late as mile 16, I still had to adjust my pace because of the crowding on the course. This was especially bad near the Urban 10 start area.
This race does not seem worthy to be called Denver's Marathon.
Lots of great beer choices in the city. We especially liked Wynkoop Brewing and Station 26. If you go, enjoy the city but keep expectations for the race muted.
By: Dena D.
Posted: May 20, 2018
Fun marathon in the mile high city!
I was a bit concerned after reading reviews from last year but I need not have worried! The expo was smaller than with bigger marathons but good. We stayed at the Marriott cherry creek and had a nice shuttle to the race @5. The race started @6 so we had plenty of time for bag check-which was easy and smooth-and potty's. It was a bit hilly and the road was rough in patches but it was a great course circling a beautiful lake, running through the firehouse complete with high 5s from firefighters and a couple runs through the mile high stadium-which was a rubberized course and felt great on the legs.
Cliff gels were served twice but you could take a coupe each time if needed. Water and Gatorade every 2 miles.
Overall good race!
By: Jon A.
Posted: May 23, 2017
Disappointed
Not having run a bigger marathon in a while, I expected more. As a few people have noted, the 'packet' contains a bib/chip and your shirt. Period. This would be fine only the website does not give you much information either. At the expo, you had to run the gauntlet through the vendors with signs saying 'shortest way to your car' only at the end of the gauntlet, you were left on the other side of Mile High stadium. The race itself is very flat, but the bottlenecks are ridiculous for a race this size. Finally, they didn't have enough volunteers and someone needed to give them more training as several people kept stopping in front of runners while crossing over to hand out cups. I shouted to one elderly gentleman who was about to get knocked over by a runner too tired to suddenly veer around him. Also the volunteers were still setting up the second water stop when I came by (corral F).
Denver is a great town, we had great weather, but the Colfax marathon left me disappointed. (This was my 40th state).
By: Andy A.
Posted: May 22, 2017
Nice course, unnecessarily crowded.
Course was a nice trip through Denver, weather was great. Limited spectator support along the course. The marathon field was decent size (about 1200) but the course felt very crowded in spots along the river and especially in finish chutes due to the large numbers of marathon relays and 10-milers who finish with the last 10 miles of the marathon. So if you like fresh runners zooming by every few miles and crowding the bottlenecks, this may be the race for you.
By: Caolan M.
Posted: May 22, 2017
One of my annual Faves
I've run this marathon for the past 6 years. It's my annual fun race! I've run a lot of marathons and this is the most well organized marathon, with tons of community support, thousands of charity dollars going to local charities, and a weekend long running celebration. I love everything about this race (and lots of distance options!).
By: Ray P.
Posted: November 11, 2016
Very memorable marathon! Loved it, loved Denver!
As a Denver native, but one whose family moved away when I was still a kid, I was thrilled to come back to the city of by birth and run a marathon on my 50th birthday.
A friend painted a shirt for me that said 'I'm 50 today! Born 5/17/65 in Denver'. Literally hundreds of fellow runners and spectators wished me 'Happy Birthday!' during the race. My wife and son had no problem finding me several times on the course by driving around using the runner tracking info and GPS. I had no problems seeing them either, thanks to the huge '50' mylar balloons they were holding.
A few people thought that parts of the course were ugly, particularly Colfax Avenue, but I don't feel like every mile has to be postcard worthy. It is historic - you run right by the Colorado Capitol building. You also run right past Casa Bonita, which to me in the 1970s, was the next best thing to Disney World. Sadly, this once iconic Mexican restaurant featuring divers and live music is a pathetic shadow of its former self. You also get to run right through a Fire Station. That was cool.
The run through Mile High Stadium was fun, and the part around Sloan Lake was very pleasant (and flat, accounting for the fastest 2 miles of my race.)
Weather was spectacular, with a brilliant blue sky and the snow-covered Rockies in full view. Temps were probably low 40s at the start, and maybe upper 50s by the time I finished.
Start and finish at City Park was perfect. A fair amount of traffic, but parking was available at the Denver Nature & Science Museum (also worth checking out), and along neighborhood side streets.
Overall, an excellent race experience. I highly recommend it.
By: Caolan m.
Posted: June 21, 2016
A Great City Marathon that does Good too
I've run the Colfax Marathon for the past 5 years (2012-16) and it is an annual favorite. The course is good and varied, the weather is usually quite good, the organization and support is impeccably, and this is one of the few non-profit marathons in the country and gives thousands of dollars to local charities. In the age of mega-business race orgs, I like to support races like this that focus on the community. I've run this for fun and I've BQed here. Just depends on the year and the purpose. This is now the only marathon in Denver, but it's been the best for many years.
By: Tony G.
Posted: May 30, 2016
Good, but not as good as it sounds
I was excited about this race, but worried about the altitude (living at sea level) - but I did not need to have worried about the latter, as I could not tell any difference. The course was not nearly as scenic as the description - the park and lake areas were nice, running through the (empty) stadium was a plus, but most of it along Colfax is a pretty low-rent down-at-heel street with cheap motels, Dollar Stores etc. - nothing scenic at all.
No complaints about the expo, except having to walk the gauntlet of every exhibitor to get out - but the race packet was sparse - no course map, and there is no start/finish area map in the packet, on line, or anywhere else, which makes it very confusing at the end of the race - I had to ask several people how to get out to the nearest road, and finding food, gear trucks etc. involved walking around in search - not want you want to do at the end of a marathon.
My other 2 criticisms are: there are too many races at once, so it is confusing to get an idea of how fast you are running when you are accompanied by relay runners and 10-milers; and there is no mention of awards, prizes, or an awards ceremony anywhere (other than corporate relay etc.). I guess there are awards and perhaps there was a ceremony - but coming 2nd in my age group makes me think I may qualify for a certificate or something - but who knows? Oh, one big pat on the back - FREE full-size downloadable race photos! That's a very nice plus! And NO wait at all for portapotties at the start - that was a first for me!
By: Dave Graves
Posted: May 21, 2015
Good Mile High memories
A good course with a full, but not crowded, field. There were nearly 1,500 in the marathon plus 650 in the relay. The half-marathoners had a separate route and start time, so that kept potential route bottlenecks open.
Aid stations were plentiful and well organized. Several music groups and other entertainment added to the festive atmosphere. Another bonus is being able to run through Mile High Stadium at Miles 6 and 20.
Medals can displayed on a table like a miniature trophy; very impressive.
Traffic in Denver can be challenging for those driving to meet a runner and the website didn't offer a map that listed the mile points. The postrace food featured a tasty barbecue. Otherwise, there wasn't much for treats.
City Park is huge and makes for a good staging ground as well as place for friends and family to gather afterwards.
By: Dave Graves
Posted: May 22, 2014
A well-organized Mile High challenge
Organizers must have taken the 2013 criticisms to heart. I didn't experience any of those problems in 2014. The race was well organized, the medal awesome and the course challenging. In fact, more challenging than this Midwestern was prepared for, but I don't consider the course to be daunting.
Running twice through Mile High Stadium and around Sloan's Lake were neat features. With 1,300+ in the marathon, there was always somebody to keep your eye on, including the gal in the 10-mile run that did a cartwheel during her run.
The aid stations were plentiful and well manned. Gel was at Miles 6 & 20.
Considering the size of the event (17,000 total runners) there wasn't much of a crowd, but how many do you expect to see at 6 a.m. Sunday morning?
The early start was appreciated because it hit 78 by 10:30 a.m.
I'm considering another try in 2015.
By: Roger D.
Posted: January 17, 2014
Great Race
I ran the Marathon in 2012 and 2013, and I love this race. I think the Colfax Marathon is the best marathon in the area, much better than RnR. And the fact that I did early registration and only paid $69.95, makes it a great value as well. I like the small expo with free parking, and the shirts are pretty nice. The race start/finish in City Park is nice and convenient, its only 3.5mi from my house. I like that I get to eat my own food and sleep in my own bed the night before. The race is very well organized, and has become my Spring marathon of choice.
By: Matt M.
Posted: August 28, 2013
Not a good experience
I would concur with comments on water stops, especially during the critical early miles. I had planned my energy gels around the water stations and filled my mouth with gel approaching the stadium, anticipating to be able to wash it down since water station at mile 2 was vacant. Alas, nothing! had to get to the lake nearly 2 miles later to get to a water station. This was frustrating and threw off my fueling/fluid intake plan early on. Very discouraging. Mile splits were very erratic (as measured by my Garmin which is thankfully very accurate). Overall marathon distance seemed correct, however. Finishline area - the only thing to drink was water and DIET Pepsi. No regular softdrinks available.
By: Shelley F.
Posted: June 03, 2013
Underwhelmed
Trying to pick up 50 states, this one worked well with the timing of other races so I decided to run it. Echoing many of the comments already posted, the race had some nice features but many issues that need to be changed.
The good:
-Being from out of state, I liked the course, but that came more from being in Denver than it does the actual route. I did enjoy the run through the stadium and the firestation- very cool. I also enjoyed the stent at Sloan's Lake- very pretty and provided a nice breeze off the water.
-I like the shirt- tech, gray, ladies got the VNeck.
-The corral start for marathoners was efficient. I loved not having to battle for positioning and didn't have to pass walkers and made it to my corral very easily.
-Plenty of portapotties prior to the race with a minimal wait.
The bad:
-Water stop organization was terrible. As previously stated, there was a dry run early in the race which included one hill in the sun and I received no water or aid until mile 7.5. The water station was set up....but nothing was there. Mentally and physically challenging, and messed with my head as I started worrying about water for the rest of the race. Unacceptable and not safe. I had the same sentiments as a prior commentor and just started taking water and aid whenever it was available because they were poorly spaced thereafter- 2 within a mile, and then none for the next three? Why?
-The expo left much to be desired. The Run Colorado vendor had a lot of good merch, but otherwise it was very congested and didn't have much to offer when we went on Saturday.
-Most of the portapotties on course were located at relay exchanges. Needed more on course for the marathoners, because every time I tried to go at a relay exchange the lines were enormous.
-The turn back into the park prior to mile 26 was overwhelmingly congested. There were tons of spectators IN the corral as I turned at mile 26, crossing over to the other side. While I may not have had to physically stop for them, the last thing I want to worry about is someone crossing in front of me with a stroller when I'm coming in to finish a marathon. This needs immediate attention.
-The marathon was expensive in comparison to other races and for the lack of aid and swag received.
-Virtually NO spectators or fans except in the neighborhood halfway. For those that did come out to cheer, THANK YOU!
-Running the race early on, you could see all of the mile marker signs for the return trip- for instance, at about mile 5, I was staring at a huge 'mile 22' sign. Perhaps make those one-sided if the course stays the same...a little bit daunting.
-No chocolate milk after the race which is my personal favorite recovery drink. In fact, all I was offered was a bagel, a bottle of water and a warm can of soda.
By: Paul A.
Posted: May 30, 2013
An event for vendors / sponsors, not for runners
Will not do this race again.
The course itself was decent, if a little scattered. Overall, my negative comments about this race have to do primarily with (1) the general feeling that the RD and team catered primarily to the sponsors / vendors / exhibitors and not to the actual runners, and (2) some HUGE misses on race day.
Expo felt like big brother. I've been to big race expos before, and I get that you tend to be herded like sheep, but this was over the top. I don't like to hang out at the expo - I want to get in, get my stuff, and get out. It was impossible at this expo. First, you could only take an elevator up to the expo area, which got jam packed. Second, once up there, the layout made absolutely no sense. You were forced to slog your way through every single vendor, etc. to get your stuff, instead of getting your stuff (all together at the beginning) and then choosing (like a big boy or girl) whether you wanted to spend time looking at the vendor's / sponsor's schwag (which I did not want to do).
Bathrooms were nice and plentiful on race day. Good job there.
There are a few things that you absolutely have to get right, and water / gatorade stops are one of them. The second water stop (around mile 2 or 3) did not have any water, gatorade, anything - just a bunch of volunteers standing around waiting for the water to arrive. THEN, the next water stop was not for at least 3'ish more miles, and that water stop had a line (literally, a line) of people, waiting to get water. You had to stop and wait in a line to get water. This is a piss poor way to run a marathon.
Finally, the finish line was a nightmare. Too many different races finishing in one spot, way claustrophobic, hard to get water / food, and then they forced you to go through the exhibitors area, whether you wanted to or not. I was feeling awful by the end of the race, just wanted a drink and to lay in the grass, and one of the volunteers attempted to refuse to allow me to do so without going through the exhibitor tent area first. Seriously? I had to force my way past him to the grassy area. Again, total disregard for the runners in an apparent attempt to please the sponsors / exhibitors.
There are way too many well-run races to waste my time coming back to this one next year, even though the start line is less than a mile from my house.
By: JP R.
Posted: May 24, 2013
Forgettable
Yeah, unless you have friends begging you to do this, really, don't worry about missing it.
Chronologically...
the expo was a mess. Long line outside the stadium, and then, as others have posted, Only being able to take the elevator up to the 3rd floor? We're freakin runners here, we don't like lines, let us take the stairs. I picked up my tag and shirt at the expo and that was it. Overall pretty disappointing.
Parking was fine on race day, nbd. Plenty of port-a-potties available, barely a wait 20min before the start. Corrals were good, nice and organized.
The course was ok, a couple of really wonky, greater-than-90degree turns which were awkward. I didn't care for the fire station but the stadium was pretty cool. The neighborhood around mile 14 was really nice with shade and people coming out to cheer. The long gradual downhill on Colfax was nice too, if not a bit crowded. The bike path, both early and late, kinda stunk. It was narrow, and there were seemingly 9 races going on with people doing 5minute miles and 12minute miles and everything in between. The finish was a total disaster. There was a spur of about 50m in the final mile - really?
And the race royally hosed up the water stops. At the second one, we got there before the water did. Cups, people, table...no water. Unreal. Then the next one was a good 3-4 miles away, including a couple of uphills, so it was a good 6ish mile stretch of no water. That's pretty poor. Then you'd go a couple of miles without one, which is fine, but then there would be 2 within a half mile of each other. Just bizarre. I ended up taking at every single one just out of fear of the next one being way far away. The volunteers were nice and plentiful.
Then the finish line itself was horrid. The 'Urban 10-miler', the half-marathon, the marathon relay, and the marathoners all come in together. I ran a 3:21 marathon, which put me in with some slower relay teams, the 2:21 halfers, and I don't even know what time for the Urban 10ers. But it was PACKED when I came through, and that bites. Can the marathoners get their own finish? Or change start times so it's not so dense? The chute afterwards were totally crammed. People were complaining about being claustrophobic and having to get out of there. A dry bagel was the first thing offered to me. Mmmmm, dry bagels. Please.
The 'expo' afterwards appeared ok, but I was tired and just wanted to split.
All in all it appears to be yet another race that caters to the groups that bring in the most money, which is the halfers and in this case, the 10ers. Marathoners, the ones out there for the longest, are a complete afterthought.
By: Jennifer B.
Posted: May 22, 2013
Okay race if you carry your own fluids
I am glad I read the comments here before I ran this one and carried my own fluids, since one of the early water stops didn't have any water or gatorade resulting in a 5+ mile dry run. Otherwise I liked the course and I thought the start and finish line areas were set up well. There were plenty of porta-potties and I though the post race food was pretty good. As others have mentioned the expo venue was tiny and all I wanted to do was grab my stuff and get out of there because it was so overcrowded. The T-shirt was okay although I prefer shirts that are event-specific (this one listed all the events so I assume even the 5k runners got the same shirt, and it did not have the date of the race anywhere on it). I liked the medal (giant 26.2) and necklace/keychain attachment.
I have to say my biggest concern about this race comes from the comments of the RD in a news article after the race. From the Denver Post, regarding the fact that the half martathon was short: 'This is a non-issue and is clearly meant to harm an otherwise important civic and community event.' In response to the runners critical of the length, Kelly said Sunday: 'If (the questioning runners) had been courteous enough to inquire about this while on site, it would have been a conversation with immediate review on the ground of course settings to satisfy (their) curiosity.'
While this refers to the half rather than the full, I don't trust any race director that thinks charging runners $80 for a race that isn't accurate in distance is a 'non-issue'. If you are hosting a race that is advertised as being run on a certified course of a specific distance than not providing what was promised is certainly an issue.
Overall I would say run it for fun, but I wouldn't try for a PR here because of the issues with fluids and the clear disregaurd for the importance of providing a certified course expressed by the RD.
By: Jeff K.
Posted: May 20, 2013
Meh
Packet pickup was horrible (on third floor of stadium, elevator access only? Really?). Expo seemed totally geared to vendors, and giving them a captive audience in a tiny space. Maybe nice for people who like that sort of thing, but I much prefer picking up my packet at my local running store. Or somewhere I can walk in and out of. No interesting swag to speak of...every half and 10K I've done has been better.
Got there at 4:50AM (for 6AM start), no problems with parking, easy walk to start.
The course itself was reasonably nice, especially the run around Sloane's Lake. After 20+ years in Denver, first time I've been to the stadium (not counting the expo)...you can tell I'm a sports nut. Could have done without the bit at the far end of East Colfax, since it was the anti-scenic. Aid stations seemed sparse the last four miles, i.e., when I really needed them.
The medal was laughably hideous. Might give a running gangsta some sort of street cred, but a mirror-finish massive 26.2? Really?
Post race food, to be frank, sucked. The 'BBQ' lunch was dry and tasteless. Lukewarm water, Pepsi, dry bagels, and bananas. In the future, I'll bring a cooler with my own post race re-fueling.
I'm pretty torn on whether I'll do this race again...my thinking is that, if I only do two marathons a year, there are probably much better choices.
By: Doug M.
Posted: May 19, 2013
overall good - some disappointments
+'s
Nice course
Neat medal
Perfect weather (this time)
Friendly aid stations*
-'s I paid $130 and:
Only 1 water stop for first 7.5 miles? (At stop #2 there were tables, cups, *friendly volunteers . . . but NO water or gatorade?)
Poorly made t-shirt (fabric kind of bunches-up around seams - for this price, pls go with a good, reputable mfg)
Only a bagel at the end (evidence there were bananas earlier)
Personal comment - I believe they over-reacted with police support. There were scores of police on bikes in areas where there were essentially no spectators and a thin stream of runners. Most of the bike police just seemed to be visiting with each other.
By: Jane B.
Posted: January 21, 2013
Big City Race with a Small Town Feel
What an awesome experience. This race is well executed and all details were handled. If you're looking to run a big city, lots of glitz, followed by a ticker tape parade kind of event then this is not your scene. If you're looking to rub elbows with down to Earth runners and get a terrific finishing time in the Mile High City, hurry and register for the Colorado Colfax Marathon.
By: AL H.
Posted: January 21, 2013
This marathon has improved greatly
II have participated in this marathon since the first year. After 6 years, they have worked out most of the problems and put on a much improved event. The course has a few hills to climb but they are not more than a block or 2 long. The run through a fire station with the firemen cheering and through the NFL stadium (twice) add to the fun. The pacers provided by the organizers stayed on pace and the race showed off the diversity of the city. I would have liked more spectators but this is not a major marathon and the spectators were mostly family and friends of the runners. I am looking forward to running this course again in 2013 as the race continues to mature.
By: Greg G.
Posted: May 29, 2012
Buy your finisher shirts and bring your own GU
I signed up for the Marathon late as I had been nursing an injury and wasn't sure I'd be able to make the run. Hence, I paid the full price of $120. $120 bucks to get on the course and I then have to shell out another 25 for a finisher shirt? Sure it's customized with my bib #, but can't it be an option for those who want to buy one?
The website also advertised GU miles 10 and 20. I saw no such GU. I don't depend solely on them to provide it but when it's advertised shouldn't it be there?
There were some very vocal spectators and I enjoyed them. But for the most part, however, the spectators and staff posted along the route were busier speaking to each other than actually observing the racers. I've also run the Waddell Marathon in Kansas City and the spectators and staff were vocal, encouraging and terribly fun. Just my observation.
Nonetheless, the weather was beautiful, I did enjoy the run and will be back.
By: Jennifer E.
Posted: May 22, 2012
Colfax 2012
I enjoyed the race this weekend - I had heard the struggles from years past so happy that there have been improvements. Aide stations need to be consistently placed along the course - there were long stretches with no water and then water stations bunched too close together. Inconsistency was bothersome towards the end. Also, when are the chip times going to be posted. So far, I'm only seeing gun times.
By: A. P.
Posted: May 21, 2012
Excellent organization, course had lots to see
This was my 1st full marathon so I only have this one race to grade. Expo was very organized with fantastic event staff. Felt a bit cramped though with what seemed like a lack of space. Packet pick-up was easy. Volunteer staff and race organizers were a major highlight. Very well organized IMO. As for the course, scenery continuously changed throughout the course. Loved the Broncos stadium and fire house run through. Everything from canal to lake to quaint neighborhoods kept it fun. The hill at mile 23-24 was a cruel joke (had to smile at that one!). The starting point at the 10-miler started to cramp available space on way back in but cleared up before mile 20. Beer tent area was crowded and slow, BBQ area was very wide open. Biggest issue would be the lack of parking and congestion before the race and getting out. Overall I loved this event and am looking forward to marathon #2.
By: Taylor P.
Posted: May 21, 2012
Well-Organized Race Showcasing Denver Warts & All
Colfax 2012 provided a very good medium-sized marathon experience. Course has changed every year, so unsure if critique will soon be dated. Nice combination of city, creek/lake/park paths, and neighborhoods; highlight of twice through NFL team's stadium. While not flat, upgrades were front-loaded and a gentle decline from mi 15-21 can yield a negative split if run smartly. A cruel uphill between mi 23-24. Big mile/half-marathon markers on ground, but not all mile points had upright signs. Only parts of the course were shady sun/heat can be tough on 4+ hr finishers. Race web site informative, and expo at the NFL stadium provided lots of room and a handful of vendors. Did a good job of being appealing to the spectrum of runners (local charity fundraising options, start corrals, bonus for course record). OK post-race food/drink at the finish, but beer and BBQ available beyond it (which didn't appeal to me at 10 a.m.). Racers and staff friendly. Spectators were moderately thick, but too many were mute except for 'their' runner. Marathon relay and half-marathon start concurrently, but latter splits off after first mile. 10-mile race joins course at 13, then 17-finish... might be crowded in future if all races grow and share same course, particularly the narrower-path course sections.
By: Tonya S.
Posted: May 21, 2012
Now in it's 7th year, Colfax has hit it's stride
Just ran Colfax Marathon for the 4th time yesterday. The course both last year and this year was great. This year it was extra special as we got to run through Sports Authority Field at Mile High - very cool. The organizers have really worked out the kinks in this race and it has become a great race. I ran the first ever back in 2006 when it was pretty much 26 miles on Colfax, uphill from Aurora to Golden - I swore I'd never run this race again after that...and I didn't until 2010 when I'd heard the course had changed. Since then they've modified the course slightly each year, I believe trying to find the best course possible, which for 2012, I believe they did. One thing I have to say is that I think this race has the BEST volunteers ever. They are out there at the crack of dawn preparing for a 6am start time. They stay all day. They greet the runners with a smile, even when we're too tired to smile back. They've never run out of water. Really, the volunteers in past years and of most forefront in my mind, this year, have been tremendous. Thank you volunteers! You make it all possible!!
By: Jeremy A.
Posted: May 18, 2011
For a first timer awesome experience
I had a blast the weather was freezing at the start only 38 degrees but made for a nice cool run. Rain was intermittent and somewhat refreshing but I think that a lot of the spectators stayed home because of it. The ones that did make it out definitely made their presence known. There was a new course record set. As a first time marathoner I didnt know what to expect so any support given was great. I especially liked both times I crossed through the relay station at INVESCO field that they called out my name and bib number that gave me a huge boost. I will be doing it again next year. My only complaint is they did not have enough GU stations other than that traffic control was excellent. Expo was lacking vendors but still had a good time.
By: Bill H.
Posted: May 16, 2011
No Mile Markers!
I am not sure how you justify not having mile markers. This race has several comments specifically noting how good the mile markers were in prior years, but this year they were random or missing. After the 4 mile, there was nothing until 8, then 10, 15, 20 and 25. The spectators were great, especially considering the weather. Volunteers were great, too.
By: Mark Abbott
Posted: May 19, 2010
Challenging, scenic course
I made a last-minute decision to run the Colfax Marathon with a friend who has run it since its inception. The expo at City Park was small but well organized. The race starts in City Park and winds its way onto Colfax Street. You run up Colfax, which is all uphill to the 13.1 mark. Then you turn around and take advantage of the mostly downhill run back downtown and finishing back at City Park. The volunteers were great. There were plenty of water stops with your choice of water or Gatorade. Spectators were small in number but very vocal - this is a relatively new race. Plenty of screaming fans at the finish. The after-race party was excellent, with beer, BBQ sandwiches, tacos and several different drinks and various snacks. The atmosphere at the park after the race was very festive and fun. While the first half of the course is challenging, it is the perfect course to run negative splits on. Just go out easy and plan on picking up the pace for the second half of the race.
Overall, the Colorado Colfax Marathon is a very nice, smaller marathon that will continue to grow. The Denver Airport was easy to get in and out of. Also, I stayed at the Doubletree Hotel on Quebec Street, which was only a 10-minute drive from City Park.
By: Gregory J.
Posted: May 18, 2010
Good for me but I have heard a lot of complaints
This was my 11th full marathon. Packet pick-up needs to be more organized, and a whole bunch more vendors need to invited or reached out to. Shirt was fine, and actually I was able to trade in my size for a better-fitting one. My name was correct on my bib, but I have heard over a dozen of complaints from other runners that theirs were not correct. Race course was fine. Good number of spectators for how small it was. Lots of aid stations. Great job from the volunteers and police.
The post-race party was okay, but please more beer and more BBQ. Some runners paid over a hundred bucks for the race, so you should at least try to do it up more. Music wasn't great, but the food was pretty good and there were lots of options.
Overall, for me personally it was a great time, and I liked everything; however, you aren't allowed to charge anything close to what Chicago, Boston, or NY until you get the numbers and bang of a big marathon.
By: John D.
Posted: May 16, 2010
Underwhelmed
Positives:
- Plenty of porta-johns
- Plenty of Water/Gatorade stations
- Finally, the return of the tech T
- Very cool medal
- Mile markers on the ground
Negatives:
- Very poor signage at the expo
- People working were giving conflicting directions or no directions as to how to complete your number/chip pickup/registration
- Again, the finishers are jammed into a claustrophobic funnel into an indoor area - and this seems to be a recurring issue
- All I wanted was a banana and a bagel after the run. But there were no bagels, and bananas were hard to find. No vegetarian options at the "barbecue."
- I was almost alone the entire race; there was lots of running room, until the last half-mile where the half marathoners and marathoners merged. I found myself dodging in and out and in between two-and-a-half-hour half marathoners. Not cool.
- The first 13 miles' entertainment consisted of passing by bands setting up and doing sound checks.
- Traffic control by Sloan Lake was horrible. I almost got hit by two cars with the assistance of a traffic guard. Thanks.
- Potholes everywhere
- The people of Denver, one of the greatest sports cities in the country, seemed to care less about this marathon
I ran the inaugural in 2006 and was incredibly impressed with the organization, the course, the public in the downtown area, and the novelty of running down the longest street in America point-to-point. It was destined to be one of the great marathons of America. What happened???
Looking forward to the Denver Rock 'n' Roll in October. It's got to be better.
By: Roger K.
Posted: May 22, 2009
Once is enough
For the cost, this marathon still needs some work. I liked the mile markers, but you never knew when water stations were going to be. There were many along Colfax, but few during the last six miles of the course. Same with port-a-potties on the race course. From mile 13 to 20, we were running in the first lane of the street, which was on a slight slant that was real hard on the feet. The first race results had me in second place for my age group but ended up in fifth place after timing problems were worked out. Runners not getting times on the course were added in the final posting. My friend finished close to the end and did not get a time because the finish line had been taken down. I don't know how many others met this fate. The medal was nice and they gave a nice white cotton shirt. This run was overpriced.
By: Molli H.
Posted: May 20, 2009
Still needs improvement
I have run the half here for three years straight. The expo is lame, the t-shirts are cotton (they ran out of smalls on Saturday even though that is what I selected when I paid my ridiculously high entrance fee) and the food leaves much to be desired. A cookie, a decent bagel, anything would have been better than going through a Safeway-sponsored food-line filled with granola bars and stale Safeway bagels. Also, as I went through the food line standing behind children who were taking bags of free stuff, I thought of the marathoners who take longer to finish and wondered if they would have any food left.
Positives: The bathrooms were set-up and there were plenty. The race started on time and was chipped. The last half of the half-marathon course is shaded and downhill sloping.
I'm not sure I'll ever run this again.
By: Alyson K.
Posted: May 19, 2009
Better than the first, but needs more improvement!
My 20th marathon and second time running the Colfax.
Negatives:
- $100... for what? The great t-shirt! Not. Give me a technical tee - something nice to run in. How about having all of the sizes available too?
- I registered race-day for the full marathon. I had to wait 20 minutes for forms to print out, I didn't get a timing chip (ran out), didn't get right size of t-shirt, and got to wear a half-marathon bib number (ran out of full).
- I paid $100 for what?
- No running hats at the expo.
- Horrible support/crowd. (Where were they)?
- The half and full should be run on the same course; my sister ran the half, and it would have been nice to have our spectators be able to see us both.
- They never posted my splits or time. (???)
I love to run marathons. They get expensive. When you pay over $60 bucks, you better get what you pay for.
Positives:
- The course has improved. The last part, running through downtown with the buildings offering shade, was nice.
- The 6 a.m. start is good, especially with the weather.
I love that the marathon is so close to my house and would like to run it again. Please use all of these comments to improve next year!
By: Denna M.
Posted: May 18, 2009
I give the marathon an A.
At first, when I went to pick up our shirts for the marathon, my brother needed an XL and they told me they didn't have any. He pre-registered, so there should of been some! Also, I thought they should invest and give you a moisture wicking shirt; for the price we pay, we deserve one. But after that, I thought the marathon was well organized. The route was pretty flat. I always expect a few hills in a marathon, and they did have that, but for the most part, it is one of the flattest marathons I have run in the United States. I loved how almost ALL of the streets were closed, and every intersection was either closed or had a cop directing traffic (and no one was getting across until it clear of runners). It was VERY nice. We didn't have to put up with car fumes much at all! Seeing the beautiful mountains while running west was a plus! And running by twice by the Bronco stadium was neat. There was plenty to look at to help pass the time. There was also plenty of food afterward and a nice medal.
By: Laurie L.
Posted: May 17, 2009
results
I agree - the policeman at mile 9 of the half rocked my world!! I wish they would stagger the start for marathoners and half-marathoners. It would alleviate so much of the clutter.
By: Not M.
Posted: May 20, 2008
Still needs work
Three years in for this race and it still has issues. And for what the entry fee is ($90-110), I can't say it is worth it.
The course is slightly improved, in my opinion, but it is definitely not "flat and fast," as the race operations manager was quoted saying. How can a nearly 400-foot climb over 6 miles be considered flat? At least you get to run down most of that hill after turning around, which does help out the "fast" aspect some, but still doesn't make it flat. Mix in some more uphills over the last 5 miles, and it is still a challenging course.
The start area was not good. Metal fences lined the start area, which made it difficult to get to the front of the pack. (I finished in the top 10, so I was lining up in an appropriate spot.) I finally asked some people to help me get over the fence, as the people were packed too tightly to "excuse me" through the crowd. There were plenty of porta-pots at the start this year. That was nice.
Then at least 50 runners were misdirected and had to run an extra third of a mile because we were led off course. This is the second year in a row that extra mileage was added to the course. There really is no excuse for this.
The relay exchanges were a bit of a pain, but it was nice to have folks cheering along there. At one spot there was some confusion as to where to run, since marathoners went around the exchange point but ran through others.
There were lots of water stops along Colfax where the course looped back on itself. Sometimes, though, they were barely a half-mile apart because of where they were positioned. Not sure if they were supposed to give water to runners going both ways, but there was plenty along that stretch.
The finish area wasn't much better than the start. I totally agree with the other poster about being herded into a large, stale-air tent with closed-in walls right after the finish. Yeah, that's refreshing. The medals are rather cool though.
The expo in the park was kind of neat, but would have been fairly disastrous if it had been raining. Most of the expo was in large tents with walls, but you had to walk a good distance through grass/dirt to get there.
By: Thomas F.
Posted: May 19, 2008
Tough first marathon
This was my second year participating in the Colfax Marathon, having done the relay last year and the full race this year. I must say, I enjoyed the course more this year going through downtown vs. all the way down Colfax. With that said, it was a really difficult first marathon to run. There were a lot of ups and downs to the course, more heavily focused on the ups! I thought the spectator participation was outstanding. There were people everywhere willing to cheer you on or give you water, Gatorade, oranges, Gu, or even a spray-down with a hose. The spectators are definitely what pushed me to the finish. The organization was ok. I also did not get a marathon shirt but left my address so hopefully they will mail me one. For the price paid for this race I believe they need to have enough shirts for the marathon runners. They had plenty of the relay shirts. The longer this race continues, the better the organization of it will get. I think if I do another marathon I would like to try a less difficult course, but if you are looking for a challenge, this is definitely a great race for you.
By: Doug M.
Posted: May 19, 2008
Denver has arrived!
Denver has arrived... finally... with a great spring marathon.
The CO Colfax Marathon team made putting on this year's well-run race look easy - which, of course, it's not.
Excellent support:
- Excellent water/Gatorade/gel stations with great volunteers... plus many extra "unofficial" water stations and hose spray stations - very welcome on this warm race day.
- Fun, eclectic mix of frequent bands and musicians - hard not to pause and listen to the fun music!
- Well-marked - a nice feature was split-time displays at regular intervals
- The hundreds of intersections were well-manned with alert police and volunteers
- Beautiful, interesting course... kept some of the unique Colfax Avenue historical "Americana" along with a nice inclusion of city, parks, lakes.
- SOOOO nice not to have to get up in the middle of the night to catch a 4:00 a.m. bus to the start. Keep the loop.
- Nice to see many Denver Rescue Mission runners - sponsored by The AIR Foundation - a great, local program that sponsors mission residents to train for and run a full marathon in order to recover/build confidence and positive life skills.
By: Steve W.
Posted: May 19, 2008
New course = problems
The 2008 race course had four problems:
First, marathoners like myself had to run through the relay exchange areas. At the first exchange, I had to walk behind a wheelchair trying to navigate a gauntlet of relay runners crowding the course in anticipation of receiving their teammate's handoff. At the third exchange point, I was running through the one-person wide corridor when a fresh relay runner behind me elbowed me aside. This was not right and in the future, I will not enter any marathon that does not have separate relay exchange areas.
Second, the start could hold maybe 1000 runners but there were 3-5 times that number.
Third, running on Simms with stopped cars spewing exhaust fumes over the runners was not nice.
Fourth, non-runners blocking the entrance to Sloan's Lake led to inconvenience.
By: Julie P.
Posted: May 19, 2008
Overall, it was a good race
I ran the half marathon, and since it was my first race, I don't have much to compare it with. However, I will try and sum up the pros and cons of this race:
Pros:
1) Flat course (half marathon)
2) Small crowd during the course but some very enthusiastic fans (thank you to the cheering, high-fiving policeman at mile 9; that helped me lot!)
3) Water stations every two miles
4) Easy course to follow
5) Shady course, especially the second half
6) Good location for my family to wait while I was running
7) Great volunteers
8) The policemen did a great job directing traffic and letting runners get through all those intersections
Cons:
1) No smaller women's t-shirts left on Saturday (I went home with a men's small shirt)
2) Cheap-looking shirts
3) Small expo
4) The stage should have been set up on the grass so the runners could enjoy the music after the race while they were stretching out
5) I went home with a 2007 medal instead of one for 2008
6) The finish area was absolutely jam-packed and was very difficult to get through
Overall, I had a really good experience and I would do the race again. Good job, Colfax Marathon!
By: Kevin B.
Posted: May 18, 2008
They got it right this year.
Ten-fold improvement over last year. Fantastic course, decent fan support and overall good organization. Whoever they talked to since last year gave them good advice - this was a tremendous success. I'll be back next year.
By: Matt Berrie
Posted: May 18, 2008
Much better course in 2008. '07 was a disaster.
I ran this race again this year - wanted to give 'em another try. Last year was a disaster - wrong mileage, terrible organization. The good stuff first: The '08 full marathon course was MUCH better, a loop starting in City Park - a great central location. There were water stops all along the course, as often as every mile in the middle, also volunteers handing out GU at least 4 times. Plenty of enthusiastic volunteers, and plenty of porta-johns at the start, unbelievably. The crowd was sparse, as expected. Now the bad - the expo sucked, in my opinion. Not many vendors, and I question the judgment of holding the expo in the same place as the start/finish. Little parking at the start, and it was all in a cramped space. The t-shirt was better than last year, as promised, but NO GOODY BAG. What the heck? Not even a bag to check race day gear. A bib, a chip, a t-shirt, and a thank you very much for the 90 bucks. Hey a goody bag is part of the deal, no? Some schwag?? So all in all, a good race; I enjoyed it very much.
By: John D.
Posted: May 18, 2008
They just can't get it right
1. No large t-shirts left on Saturday afternoon. Glad I signed up for one.
2. T-shirt was lame. The Boulder Bolder one is nicer. I don't need another sleep t-shirt.
3. Expo was tiny.
4. The starting area was INCREDIBLY confusing and set up for failure.
5. "Go?" That's how a marathon starts?
6. Faster course? Fewer hills? All hills. They managed to pick the hilliest part of the old course and then add 17th St. just for good measure, which was more difficult than the original course ending at the mall.
7. Finish line gives you 25 feet to walk off your run and then shoves you into a packed airless tent. Horrible.
8. It seemed the race was basically set up for relays. Is it not possible to keep the hand-off points at least 5 feet-wide? Difficult to run through.
Good point: Plenty of port-a-potties. Certainly not a reason to run a fourth Colfax Marathon next year.
By: Juan Gonzalez
Posted: March 25, 2008
Overall it was a good race
The elevation killed me and the gradual incline didn't help, but overall, the support of the crowd and other runners was great!
By: Wayne R.
Posted: August 15, 2007
I so wanted this to be great...
...but it totally sucked. The organization was fine except for the course coverage. Not the thing to have at the midway point where it was so conspicuous and kind of demoralizing.
The real bummer is Colfax itself. Now, before you brand me an interloper who has no right to put down Colfax, I work at National Jewish, right at the 11-mile mark, and collaborate with folks at Fitzsimmons (miles 5-6) all the time. I want to see Colfax be re-developed as much as the next guy, and I understand that Aurora, Denver, and Lakewood have teamed up to try and help the process along through events like the marathon. Great, I'm 100% behind you.
The problem is that the course is just really, really awful. I knew it would be, but I wanted to do it once just to tell people, "yep, I ran 26.2 miles down Colfax."
How to change the course? Leave out the Lakewood section, add a long loop through Stapleton, extend the loop through city park, throw in a loop around Cheeseman park, and then finish at either the state capitol - or logistically, Invesco Field would be a better choice in terms of parking, etc.
Also, to keep Lakewood involved, they could start the half-marathon at Colorado Mills Mall and finish at the same place as the marathon. That way, it would be almost all downhill, except for a relatively moderate climb at the start heading east from CO Mills.
But will they listen to me? Probably not.
By: Sue W.
Posted: June 20, 2007
A unique but tough course.
I chose this race for its unusual route - I have never run a marathon along one street before. I loved the changing neighborhoods, the ability to see the course for miles ahead and the constant clear view of the distant mountains. However, I was ill-prepared for the temperature. The lack of shade on the course meant little escape from the sun and the radiated heat from the pavement. The final steep ascent once inside the Colorado Mills Mall complex was also hard to bear.
Despite the fact that there was a discrepancy in the measurement between mile 12 and 13, causing marathoners to run 1/2 a mile extra (which was demoralizing at the time) I feel that the organizers handled their error well and did their best to redress the balance.
By: Doug M.
Posted: June 09, 2007
The wrong focus
The race organizers seem to spend too much time and money on advertising and promotion while neglecting some basics:
- Transportation/parking is confusing and brutal - you need to catch a bus around 4:00 a.m. only to have to wait around for over an hour for the start.
- No gel shots as promised. Couple that with warm weather and an uphill finish (not to mention the "free" 1/2 mile accidentally added on to the course around mile 12) is a sure way for runners to run out of gas before the finish line.
Recommendations:
- Get the price right for what is delivered. This is one of the poorest values in US marathoning.
- Focus on race basics (bathrooms, keeping support promises, simplifying transportation logistics) and less on self promotion and publicity.
- Keep up the initiative to encourage shelter residents to train and run. That was inspirational and a very worthy cause.
- Keep admitting when you make mistakes. The race director handled the extra .5 mile flub-up in a stand-up way.
By: W. B.
Posted: June 05, 2007
The sun, and hills, snuck up and bit me
Wow. I finished my 71st marathon with congestion/sinusitis. The sun intensity and gradual uphill climb both got the best of me. This is probably a good choice for your Colorado marathon if you want to avoid running at even higher altitudes with more hills. The course being 1/2 mile off didn't bother me as much as the end of the full marathon course turn and climb to the finish line, in the heat, after some more hills.
By: Yevgeniy G.
Posted: June 02, 2007
It was off by more than 0.5 mi
It is pretty demoralizing to run through the half-marathon start gates and see that you were not at expected 13.1 mi, but at 14.8 mi. By the time I'd finished my GPS was showing 27.8 mi. I don't know who had certified this course. I'm totally aware that these gadgets may not be absolutely accurate, but if anything they would show less, not more. I've run both marathons and must say that I didn't like either, but wanted to stick around to see if things had gotten better.
By: Katie R.
Posted: May 28, 2007
Getting better each year; a few kinks to work out
The t-shirts were really... not very cool. There were supposed to be gels at mile 20? Was counting on that fuel, but they weren't there. Need more food on the course - get donations from big companies and have schools hand them out... even candy or more oranges. The Sloans Lake detour was great, much better than last year. Need a better way to get to the start without waiting around for an hour. Maybe have some of the expo tents at the start so people can move around and look at stuff. Looking forward to next year.
By: Tim W.
Posted: May 24, 2007
One to Avoid
I've run more than a dozen marathons and this one was the worst by far. The course is dreadfully dull, and the final six miles are almost entirely uphill - including a grueling finish. Many of the water stations were understaffed, so runners had to stand and wait for water; there were not enough toilets at the start and all along the course; and there were very few spectators. There is no parking or runner drop-off at the start, so you're forced to park 3 miles away and take a bus to the start. Thus, there were very few family or friends at the start to support the runners. And finally, to add insult to injury, the race T-shirt is poor quality. Today there's even a news article about how the race organizers flubbed the course mileage and runners did an extra half-mile! This race was an absolute embarrassment.
By: Jonathan G.
Posted: May 22, 2007
Not bad org. for 2nd year, but the course is borin
Positives:
- Lots of water/Gatorade support.
- Good spectator support.
- Not too big of a crowd,
- Great volunteers - really nice, supportive people.
Negatives:
- With the 6 a.m. start, the point-to-point and the lack of parking at the start line, we had to board buses between 4 a.m. and 4:30, and then wait at the start line for an hour. It was just a long, slow process to even start the race. (It would have been great to have coffee at the start.)
- This is a personal preference issue, but the race, as advertised, is almost a straight-line run up Colfax. For me, I found this boring.
- While the support stations had lots of water, there were no gels or food, and the porta-potties were limited.
- For the very expensive fee, the goodies were sparse. There was a great medal, and OK pre-race t-shirt, no finishing shirt, and no food support. This is the most I have ever spent on a marathon, and the least I have received. The cost/benefit just seems out of whack. (That being said, I can guess that they probably need some more runners to cover the fixed costs.)
- Of 5,000 entrants, there were fewer than 500 marathoners. This really is a relay race, not a marathon. Don't know why, but this bugged me a bit.
By: Matthew Berrie
Posted: May 22, 2007
Incline at end of race was brutal; great spectator
This was my first marathon, the best experience of my life. The course was generally flat until mile 15 or 16 with a gradual climb to the end, with the last half-mile or so a brutal climb to an uphill finish. I hit the wall aroung mile 18, found my second wind about mile 20, but was questioning my sanity and the logic of so many hills at the end. It ended well for me - the most satisfying, agonizing, and incredible experience. I will run other marathons - this one only if they reversed the course with the incline at the start (wow, what a concept). Good organization, plenty of water stations, porta-potties, and no traffic problems that I encountered. The sponges soaked in cold water at mile 23 helped me finish the race! It was also hot at the end of the race - about 73, man I was feeling it. All in all, as an inexperienced marathoner, I give this race an 8 overall.
By: Chris J.
Posted: May 22, 2007
Worst Race Ever
There is a line in the movie "Armeggedon" when someone asks what it'll be like on the asteroid. After a very bleak explanation, Owen Wilson says, "Oh, so the worst environment imaginable. That's all you had to say." Well, when you ask me what I thought about the Colfax Marathon, that's my answer. Worst race ever. I think that if I had to choose to run a marathon on Colfax or run a marathon on a treadmill, I'd pick the treadmill. Why?
* Early start
* Not enough bathrooms at the beginning (heard it was worse for the half runners)
* No gel, Gu or fruit at any aid stations
* Not enough aid stations, especially towards the end
* Cost is too high for what you get
* Crowd support, outside of the volunteers, was very poor. Unless you count the high number of "motels by-the-hour" guests that came out to see what the heck was going on outside. There was hardly anyone the finish. And the sound system was terrible.
...and last but not least...
* Whoever thought of running a marathon down (or UP) Colfax should be in a straight jacket. They said that there were some additions this year and that the finish line would be better. Wrong. The loop around Sloan's Lake was nice, but the run back to Colfax wasn't. Folks, it's a straight shot for 26.2 miles. When you crest one hill, you can literally see two miles ahead of you. And the finish is straight uphill. It is so very demoralizing.
This was my 8th marathon. I usually run around 3:30 and ended up 20 minutes slower for this. I honestly almost quit at the half because I was so digusted with the whole thing. From the look of the numbers (fewer than 400 total marathoners), this might not be a race that stays around long.
The "new" Denver Marathon, which is run in October, is SO much better than Colfax, and didn't get nearly the same amount of press and advertisement.
Stay away from Colfax, everyone. If you want to run a marathon out here in the elevation, I recommend Denver, Ft. Collins, Durango, or for the brave, Pikes Peak.
By: Mary B.
Posted: May 22, 2007
Golden Hill/last 1.5 miles
Isn't there some way to rearrange the last part of this race? From Golden Hill on it was extremely challenging. Maybe a couple of more times around Sloan's Lake to take to save us from that treacherous ending? I'm all about pushing myself, but 26 miles is pushing it pretty good! Organizers and stations/volunteers were awesome. Thanks!
By: Brian H.
Posted: May 21, 2007
Hot but an o.k. time
Born and raised in Denver, I have spent the last 4 years in Chicago, which probably made the race more difficult for me. We do not have altitude or hills of any kind. What Chicago does have is a AMAZING marathon, and sometimes I need to stop comparing other races to my home town.
Lets start with the expo. It was a good size for this type of race. One thing they could improve upon would be to have an actual marathon guide explaining all of the information about the race including the bus schedule, gear check, etc. They did have a small newspaper with all this as well as the website, but a guide book is ideal.
On the race morning, there were not very good markings of where the parking at the Colorado Mills mall was. The busses did not have clear markings of which one was for the marathon and which one was for the half. I knew that Leg 1 had to be the marthon, but my friend running the half could not find his bus. Another suggestion would be to have a better gear check. Having to leave your bag on the bus and expect it to be at the finish is not ideal.
There were ample toilets to use at the start of the marathon, but my friend running the half did not have any ready when the busses arrived to drop off the first group of people.
There were little fan support, but a little is better than none right? I would aslo suggest having medical tents every few miles. Or at least have some tables with things like Body Glide and Band-Aids. I only saw one of them set up towards the finish.
When they say that it is going to be hot and uphill most of the way, they were not kidding. There was little shade throughout the whole race and the last 5 miles were always at a steep incline. I have never seen so many runners walking the last few miles and especially walking up the last .2 miles to the finish line. Maybe put the finish at an area that will not have such a steep finish?
I hope the race director reads all the information people post and can make minor adjustments to help make the Colfax Marathon a big success in the future.
By: Jimmy McCullough
Posted: May 21, 2007
Excellent support
I felt excellent support from the staff. I would suggest these improvements: 1: More porta-potties at the start, and one extra at each station where they were placed. People should not have to be forced to wait so long.
2: In the last 6-8 miles, when you are trying to meet a time goal, it means so much to know how much distance remains. Could you place BIG signs, at EXACT locations saying, "exactly 5.0 miles to go," "4.0," "3.0," etc.? When we were at the aid station that was at about 21.6 or so, people, referring to a "mile 22" sign a few blocks up the street were proclaiming loudly, "Only 4 miles to go," when it was really more like 4.5 miles. When you are so weary and trying to mentally calculate what pace is going to meet your goal, this is very discouraging when it takes you so long to reach the next mile marker, and still it is difficult to calculate division by 4.2 miles, 3.2 miles, 2.2 miles. In summary, regardless of the aid station location, just have large "4.0 miles to go," "3.0," "2.0," "1.0 mile" signs up. Even going back to 10.0 would be helpful. Thanks.
By: Preston P.
Posted: May 21, 2007
Second Time Running Colfax
I said I was coming back, and I am glad that I did. The organization was great, the weather this time was not as hot, and the fans on course were very supportive. Downside: I am pretty sure we ran more than 26.2 miles - I think it was 26.7. My Garmin showed us running 1.5 miles between mile markers 12 and 13. Our pacer had the same issue. Otherwise, every mile marker was spot on. Lots of refreshments, good music, food at the end. This was my second time running Colfax and I plan on coming back next year!
By: Becca L.
Posted: May 20, 2007
Good - but could definitely be better, please!
I did the half. Was a fun race. The uphill ending into a parking lot left something to be desired. Biggest issue was that there were only 6 porta-potties at the half start - for almost 1,700 finishers. Not pretty. If we are to hydrate, train and have a good race, someone should see to it that we can use a toilet before the race starts, for heaven's sake. There should be over 30 porta-potties. This is done so well at so many races; hard to believe they can't get this right. I was told there were 5 last year. Easy enough to fix if someone decides to.
By: Preston P.
Posted: December 11, 2006
A hard marathon for my first but I am coming back.
This was my first marathon. I really like the history of Colfax Avenue and loved seeing the street so active on a Sunday morning. The organization including the registration, web page, updates and training runs were all well done. I spent little time at the expo, so I can't really comment on it. The start was early since you arrived at the end of the race to take a bus 26 miles to the start - I got up at 4, arrived at the end of the race at 4:30 and was bussed to the starting line around 5:15. But, I'd rather start early and have the bus ride at the beginning than after I finished. This is what happens with a point-to-point race, isn't it? The race was generally downhill with some short ascents for the first 18 miles and then was brutally uphill the last 8.
Temperatures were around 50 at the start but soared to over 80 for the end of the race. There was little shade once you left City Park and the road became really hot when the race started its uphill stretch. Lots of fan support, bands throughout the course, people in pajamas cheering you on, and the large sponges in cold water around mile 22 were the most refreshing things I have ever experienced. I stopped and took a second sponge. The pacer was right on time. The aid stations were well stocked. Well prepared and energetic volunteers. I thought the event was just fantastic and I am already signed up for the 2007 race. Recently I purchased a "Fax is Back" t-shirt that I will proudly wear to other events to encourage people to come in 2007.
By: Andrew L.
Posted: September 17, 2006
Pretty darn good for an inaugural marathon
As the first time this race has been run, I have to say that it was reasonably well put together. Although I was questioning the logic of a 26.2 course with virtually no turns (besides the park section at the halfway point), I actually enjoyed the uniqueness... even if it is horribly brutal at the end. At over 5,000 feet elevation and with the last 8 miles uphill, you won't set any personal records, but it is actually enjoyable to run from township to township and watch the scenery change. There were some minor things that were lacking in organization, but I expect that of a first-year marathon and I bet the problems won't exist next year. The markers were spot on, the aid stations were well stocked. LOTS of volunteers to help out, and an impressive number of spectators (especially for the ridiculously early start), with bands playing some great tunes along the route.
Basically...
The good:
- Fun route ALL the way through Denver
- Excellent offical pacers
- Excellent spectator and volunteer support
- Excellent and frequent aid stations
The bad:
- Not enough medical support at the finish
- Mild organizational issues (probably won't happen again)
- REALLY early start
- Poor excuse for a goodie bag and post-race expo, especially for a $100 entry fee
- Terrible finish location (steep hill to a huge parking lot, lots of runner congestion, NO SHADE ON ASPHALT!!)
Would I run it again? If the finish was in a different area, or at least had a LOT of cirucs tents and seats for shade, and if it was cheaper.
By: Mark V.
Posted: August 08, 2006
Tough, tough race; needed more water in 2nd half!
My only comparison is to Boston. I thought that the race organizers could have emphasized the uphill nature of the second half, rather than say it's a relatively flat course. Also, considering the heat, they needed H2O at every mile from City Park to the finish. I live and train in Denver and the heat + hills = dehydration, and did me in.... I was way off pace, mainly because of the last 5 miles or so. I don't think I'd ever run this one again unless as part of a relay team... which the organizers seemed to favor anyway. I did have the chance to talk with Mayor Hick right before the capitol - cool!
By: Kari J.
Posted: June 24, 2006
WOW!!
Ok, as a Denver native, my first thought about running 26.2 miles down Colfax Ave. was not a positive one. I though whoever came up with this "bright idea" needed their head examined. I am pleased to say I was shocked by how much I loved this race! Every aspect of this race blew me away, from the fantastic volunteers to the spectators and police. The organization was incredible. My only complaint is the City Park section. There were no spectators and it wasn't as well marked as it could have been. Well done, Denver! I will be back and will recommend this race to others! You did our state proud!
By: Joe P.
Posted: May 29, 2006
Host hotel correction
My apologies to the new Hyatt Convention Center hotel.
They are the host hotel and I inadvertantly said Hilton in my remarks.
Must still be oxygen deprived.
By: Tom D.
Posted: May 27, 2006
Great organization saves this one
Running straight down one road for some is OK, but not for me.
The organization was top-notch - great expo, plentiful H2O stops, great finish area. The only complaint was that there was no info sheet in the packet. When was the start? Where do I park or do I take a shuttle? Where to meet family? etc... would have been helpful.
It was a record high temp for the day, so I can't complain about that, it happens.
The course is what it is - thus the Colfax Marathon. The last 12K is a brutal 700-foot gain with no spectators at altitude - very hard for a road marathon. Couple that with the heat and it sucked!
Don't expect to run fast here. Enjoy looking at the mountains throughout the course because that is what will get you through it.
Great finish area at the mall and great medal.
By: Linda T.
Posted: May 27, 2006
Great Marathon.
I think that organizers put on a great first-time marathon. I could not believe how many volunteers were on the course - many just in the intersections cheering the runners on. The people of Aurora were wonderful - so much enthusiasm. I was surprised at how many police officers were also encouraging the runners. I was worried about the 2nd half of the course but have no complaints about the course. Glad I picked this one for my Colorado marathon. My only complaint was the lack of information concerning the bus to the starting line from the host hotel. It took me several attempts before I was comfortable and felt like there was indeed a bus to the start. This information could be in the race packet along with the info provided race morning regarding the logistics of water, Gatorade, and how the relays would be handled.
By: Terry N.
Posted: May 26, 2006
A good run overall
There was some confusion regarding the buses going from the finish area to the start at 4:30 a.m. but the 6 a.m. start became a blessing when the sun got up and the temps began to climb. There were parts of the course when you are looking right at the mountains and that was beautiful. Crowd support was very sparse and located in the center of the 3 cities we ran through, but for an inaugural event it seemed OK, even though we would like more. The trip through City Park in Denver was like getting lost in a giant maze and as others have mentioned, the last 6 miles were steep. I wasn't very happy with my time but when I saw the winning times I guess the course really did have something to do with it overall. For other flat-landers considering this next year, I never experienced anything that I thought was altitude-related - at least as breathing goes - so give it a try and maybe the organizers can end this race in the West Denver shopping center to give it a downhill run to the finish.
By: Ken O.
Posted: May 24, 2006
Hot and hilly but worth the effort...
Overall a good rating, as it wasn't the race director's fault that the temperatures were 20 degrees warmer than normal. Crowds were loud and enthusiastic. There was enough Gatorade and gel packs for even the slowest runners. However, as a back-of-the-pack runner, I was dismayed to see lots of race staff leaving City Park as we ran in. My fears proved correct when many runners in my group got lost among the confusing cone placements and no one was there to point the way out. Don't forget us in the back - we may be slow, but we're out there even longer than you, and sometimes we need all the help we can get! Also, after spending hours running towards the mountains, it was a bit deflating to finish in a parking lot behind a mall.
By: Shawn S.
Posted: May 23, 2006
Denver, you may have finally found your marathon!
This was my 9th marathon, 4th in Colorado and 3rd in Denver and I think that Denver has one that will stick around. The organizers did an excellent job. The volunteers were great and the aid stations were spread out perfectly (every 2 miles until the last 6 and then every mile). This was an unusually hot May day; however you need to be ready to expect the unexpected for this time of year in Colorado.
I was 20 minutes off my PR; I attribute some of this to the heat, as you are running on the street with little or no shade cover and the last 8 miles are up hill. All that aside, what an experience to run all the way through the Denver Metro on what use to be the life blood of the city before the interstate system. You get to experience every walk of life on this street. The crowds could have been bigger, but I think that will come with time. Again, job well done and I would recommend this race to anyone!
By: Joe P.
Posted: May 23, 2006
Excellent Organization
Denver was my 25th marathon and state. For an innaugural event the organization was fantastic. Everybody involved seemed to be "in-tune" with what was going on and worked hard to make this first-time event go off without a problem. The goodie bag actually had something in it besides race flyers. Bib numbers were well designed and if you registered early your name was printed on them. Wish the medal had said "2006 Inaugural Marathon" but that's OK it still looked better than most I've gotten. The race staff emailed me back quickly with responses to my inquiries.
The Hilton host hotel was most accommodating and everyone there was very helpful for this out-of-towner. Special thanks to everybody at the Hilton. What super rooms they have there at this new location.
While the elevation gain was less than 300 feet, the grade climbs especially after the 18 mile-mark took their toll on this flat-lander. But we had a great time. The spectators that came out were fun dressing up in costumes, pajamas and just about everything else under the hot, humid thin Denver air that left me out of O2. The only knock on this race and it's only a disappointment is that the half marathoners start at mid-race point, so you basically are running only with other marathoners and relay marathoners the whole day. Makes for a thin race group and it get lonely at times. Hopefully, the race will grow and take care of this. Spectators, volunteers and traffic control was just great. Way to go Denver. Thanks so much.
By: Tonia F.
Posted: May 23, 2006
Great run but not enough port-a-potties
The race was great, but to use the port-a-potty was a time-killer. It added 10 minutes to my "official" time... I timed it on my watch. And it wasn't the actual act of going - IT WAS the line for two port-a-potties.
Loved running toward the mountains; a great day for running and the finish was SPECTACULAR!!! Loved all the tents and cheers.
By: Albert E.
Posted: May 23, 2006
Good inaugural marathon
Congratulations to the organizers of this race! Overall the event went smoothly and kudos to the volunteers and officers who manned every corner so no traffic cut through the runners.
A couple of things I wanted to suggest: more entertainment along the course since not very many people came out to cheer the runners and more advertisement for the public to know that there is a race in their community. I stayed in a hotel a few blocks from Colfax and the employees don't know what's going on.
This is the most difficult race I've been to because of the heat and the elevation at the latter part of the course but I considered it as another race experience.
By: Thomas S.
Posted: May 23, 2006
beautiful day for a run
I ran only the half marathon, but the whole experience was great. My only qualm was that there were too few porta-johns; lines in the middle of a race are no fun. Still, it was a great time overall.
By: Dave C.
Posted: May 23, 2006
tough course with great workers and few spectators
Nice course with a tough, uphill, hot finish the last 8 miles. All volunteers did a great job, both at water stops and after the finish line. You need much better info on the website (see other marathon sites) beforehand. Nice shirt. Too much money for the poster (most are free). Keep up the good work and you will have a great marathon in years to come.
By: Jarrett Roberts
Posted: May 22, 2006
Successful Inaugural Run On a Record High Day
Inaugural marathons can be very good (i.e., Mercedes Marathon in 2002 in Birmingham, Alabama) or complete disasters (i.e., San Diego Rock 'n Roll in 1998). The inaugural Colorado Colfax Marathon was a great success!!!
With outstanding preparation and planning, Creigh Kelly and his team of volunteers overcame a record high of 91 degrees (beating the previous record of 90 degrees set in 1925). There were water and aid stations at least every two miles and some places every mile. The course was fully closed and the finish also well supported with various snacks and drinks. There were multiple bands, a java fest, sponge and spray stations along the course. The medal was beautiful and well designed. The bibs had our names on them and the marathon design painting.
I was one was one of the first to sign up for the Trailblazer offer, which freezes my entry fee at the early bird fee that I paid this year - a unique feature that I have not seen at any of the other 76 marathons I have run. As such, I look forward to future runnings of the Colorado Colfax Marathon and encourage others to run this well organized and supported event.
This is sure to be a destination marathon that will grow in coming years and become a top tier running event.
By: Lina G.
Posted: May 22, 2006
Great race for first effort
I had ran a few marathons and several half marathons. I thought that I would not enjoyed running the whole Colfax but I have to admit that it was a very pleasant race for their first effort. There were plenty of fluid stations as well as porta potties. Volunteers were friendly and helpful. The post race food was generous both in quantity and quality!! Best of all, the medallion was a first class beauty! If those things I mentioned are important to you as a runner, then this is the race for you! Thank you for making this a great and safe race for all of us. Way to go Aurora, Denver, and Lakewood city!!
By: Doug Meadows
Posted: May 22, 2006
Like a Route 66 Americana museum
The unexpected treat for me was Colfax Avenue itself - thelongest commercial street in the US. It was once Hwy 40 (main highway before I-70 was built) and ended it's hay day. This race takes you back in time to an era before the franchise explosion (where all new areas looks exactly the same . . . a fun franchise exception was a 60's era McDonalds with those giant original 'golden arches'. The whole course is mile after mile of unique, one-of a kind businesess . . . like Davie's Chuckwagon Diner (40's era with shiny aluminum and red trim), 100 little motels complete with 'roadside' architecture and names like 'Buggs Bunny' and 'Trails End'. Colfax Avenue (especially the East half) is not without some local character . . . many financial establishments (money orders, pawn and pay-day loan shops), some exotic entertainment (adults only, please) and lots of small, sketchy used car lots. At 6:00 a. m. Colfax Avenue is very tame . . . it's supposed to be pretty lively at night.
Quite a few businesses pitched in to possibly double the number of official aid stations on the last half. Enough fans provided hose showers (a welcome treat on the day approaching an unusual 90 degrees). I've run lots of scenic courses . . . but, for me this one was the most interesting and entertaining . . . running on a closed street being the only way to be able to appreciate it and have time to reflect on a past Americana era.
The race organizers have a goal to renew Colfax Avenue . . . I wish them well . . . but, it's already great - run the race before any of the old Americana charm is lost.
By: Jim G.
Posted: May 22, 2006
Anyone have Issue with Mile Marker Placement?
I was very impressed with how friendly and well-organized the expo was. The coordinators remembered the little things, like reminding runners to grab some safety pins out of the bowl, and kindly indicating that your bib number must first be located before going over to the packet table. (I've been at other expos where the staff looks at you rudely just because you're not sure how the system works.) I ran the half. Both the half and full marathoners finished at the same location. Using my GPS watch, however, I noticed something interesting. My watch was alerting me of a mile--at the marathoners' mile signs. By the time I crossed the half-marathon mile signs--my watch was already reading .1 mile more. My final distance showed up as 13.2 miles, not 13.1. GPS isn't 100% accurate, but it is probable that the half marathon mile markers should have been where the marathon mile markers were, and the marathon mile markers should have been .1 further back.
This isn't a big deal to me either way, but I was curious if other runners observed the same.
By: Carrie D.
Posted: May 22, 2006
Well organized - great support and participation
Very impressed by all the details.
By: John D'Angelo
Posted: May 22, 2006
Historic and hilly
For a first time marathon, I compare the organization to the likes of Boston and New York. BRAVO!!! From the Expo to the course set up, top class! After seeing the winning time, I don't feel so bad with a 3:57. A cool start in Aurora turned into a heat wave by the half-way point. I believe it was even a new temp record for Denver. The last 10k were brutal as I was not well hill-trained. It was like being on a step master! Even the finish at the mall was a huge hill.
Needed for next year: Better instructions on Drop off at Aurora, better instructions for return busses to the Hyatt. Also, maybe some more waterstops downtown before the hills (otherwise there were PLENTY of water stops).
Oh.....one final THANK YOU to the guy handing out the ICE COLD sponges at mile 22 or 23. Thank you, thank you, thank you.....you saved me from possibly having to stop.
-JRD
By: Carolyn P.
Posted: May 21, 2006
Great inaugural race.
Race organization was great. The volunteers on the course appeared to be well trained and handled the water stops traffic control and runner support very well.
Could improve a bit on making race day instructions a bit more intuitive including where family should meet at the end.
I've run 21 marathons before Colorado, so speak from a bit of experience.
Coming from Houston (but grew up in Denver) it was a bit difficult to get some of the information I was seeking. Perhaps if you lived in Denver or could constantly monitor emails I might have been ok, but as an out of stater would suggest a bit more obvious info including start and ending detail maps (I have since learned I could see more detail on the 'Certification Link', not very intuitive to me.
Great job overall, a bit more hand holding for out of towners.
By: Rama N.
Posted: May 21, 2006
First marathon, ending was steep!
My first marathon so nothing to compare to. However, this race was a lot of fun, running through 3 cities towards the mountains was a blast. The last 10k was brutal, up hill and hot with few spectators to give you the boost.
By: Bill A.
Posted: May 21, 2006
1st marathon
This seemed to be well put together as far as I could tell. The 6am start saved many from an unusally hot May day. Unfortunately, I was one of the later ones. My final time was 4 hours 20 minutes, well beyond my expectation of just under 4 hours. The final 7.5 miles are in most cases a mild rise with three slightly steeper hills at Federal and one at Simms and of course the last 2 10ths to the finish. The winner was at 2 hours 45 minutes which either tells me the course was slower for everyone or there wasn't an elite there. Time will tell. The next one will be Boulder Back Roads.