By: Jim G.
Posted: May 01, 2023
Beautiful Course
I ran this event to get Utah completed in my 50 state quest. The course was beautiful with the Rockies in the background and majestic homes through many areas of the route. It was hard for me in the beginning as it starts up a hill and the high altitude had me gasping for air! Also, after mile 2 or 3, it is about 4 miles all downhill which did a number on my quads!
It should be noted that the road surface is very cracked and pot holed in areas. There were plenty of rest stops with water, Gatorade poured from bottles, so it was the correct mixture. Plenty of Gu shots as well.
The expo was a bit smaller than I expected and is only for one day, so expect crowds. They had the usual stuff, although the IV drip booth was giving free B-12 injections!
The logistics for doing this race were awesome. Easy to take the Trax train from the airport to downtown for only $2.50. The downtown is very walkable, clean and friendly. The Trax is also free in most of the downtown area.
The medal and shirt were very nice and I would recommend this race if you need Utah.
By: Gr H.
Posted: April 25, 2022
Organized, beautiful, hard.
Finally got to run this race after it being canceled twice for COVID!
This was my 25th marathon. I've run all over the country, from sea to shining sea. I think this is the hardest marathon I've ever run. Some of it is baked into the cake (altitude, hills), and some factors couldn't be helped (snow).
The good:
* Beautiful course. Even though it was a cloudy day, you still had some terrific views of the mountains. I can't imagine how stunning the scenery would look on a clear day.
* The city's light rail system very efficiently gets all the runners to the start line for this point-to-point race. (In general, SLC is an awesome city. So clean and friendly.)
* Good expo and swag. I really like my medal.
* Lots of water stations. Volunteers were great.
What made this race hard:
*Hills! The race starts at nearly 5,000 feet and loses a net of 700 feet throughout. But there are some challenging hills all the way, a couple of the hardest coming in the first few miles. So when you're trying to getting an early rhythm going, you get hit with tough hills that were mentally and physically taxing.
***This is a good destination to plan for if you're trying to do all 50 states. SLC is an awesome city (and I typically hate big cities in general and big city marathons in particular). This didn't feel like the big city experience at all. It was easy to get into the airport and easy to get out, and there was plenty to do when not running to make it a fun weekend.
By: StockSack G.
Posted: April 24, 2019
Do not run this if you are a slower runner
I have run and completed 16 marathons and was on pace to complete this one but after mile 18 , no one told me there was a turn and I ended up by myself and way off of the course. The shag bus started following me closely at mile 13 and I finally asked him to pass me because the constant chugging and breaking of his bus was making me a nervous wreck. They told my husband the race was over when the bus passed but at least three of us were still on the course. Very little support after we split from the half's. The marathon sponsored van at the host hotel stopped running an hour and a half before the start when we were told it ran up until the start. We had to take an Uber. I contacted the race director to tell him all of this and all he said was that he was sorry I had a bad experience. He should have apologized for his staff not informing me of where to turn.
By: Bill B.
Posted: April 16, 2019
Could be better
A nice race in a pretty part of the country. The first 6 miles or so are scenic, the rest not so much. Organization was good except for no race results on their website as of Tuesday and the results on Marathonguide are gun times. On course, the organization was on point with frequent water stops and plenty of portable toilets.
I liked the race but didn't love it. Nice shirt and medal.
We enjoyed liquid refreshment at Fisher's, Epic and Hopkin's Breweries. SLC and environs is a beautiful place to visit.
By: Lindsay F.
Posted: April 23, 2018
Plenty of Porta-potties!
These guys covered everything runners wish for in a great race!
1st- I never had to wait for a porta-john. I arrived at the start with 30 mins to gun time and had no problem walking right to an open honey bucket. On the course when I needed one, there was no waiting. And again at the finish there was no need to wait in line! Super impressive!
2- Great course support! I swear sometimes the aid stations were not even a mile apart! Each one offered Gatoraid and water and several offered GU in popular flavors like Salted Carmel, Chocolate, and the Berry flavors. There were also a bunch of local musicians out on the course just playing for the runners. One was a woman just standing out there playing her banjo! Others had their full band and speakers set up playing their music.
3-Fantastic views throughout! The race hit all the famous SLC landmarks, starting at the University of Utah and ending right in the heart of downtown. It ran through several historic and unique neighborhoods, up and down a canyon (not an out-and-back), and right past the capitol building and temple. The trees were in full bloom and it smelled fantastic!
4- Finish line: included plenty of food (I couldn't carry everything I was being handed) including pancakes! There were free massages and free medal engraving. They had a jumbo-tron sized screen set up so people could see their runners coming in about a mile away. Plenty of music and party atmosphere at the finish.
5- Transportation to and from the race was a piece of cake. Your bib was your free ticket to public transportation and they had plenty of light rail cars running so I never had to wait more than 5 mins to catch one. I didn't have to get to the race super early and just stand around until the start because the transportation dropped you right at the start and you could catch it right at the finish again. Super convenient!
By: Paula M.
Posted: May 15, 2017
Great Organization!
This being my first marathon, I don't have much to compare it to, so you can take that into account in reading my review.
Pros: What struck me the most about the race was the organization of the course. This marathon runs through the city, there are no trails/paths. Therefore, each intersection had to be manned to ensure safety, and they were! I was blown away by how much planning and manpower that required, thanks to the men and women in blue!
I'm from Wyoming, so I trained at altitude, so that wasn't an issue, but did hear that it was a struggle for some. There were some short hills, but nothing too brutal. It was a great way to see Salt Lake City, I'd never been there. Crowd support was minimal but very positive. Loved how many residents showed up to offer water and refreshments, in addition to the organized water stops, which were frequent and well stocked/staffed.
Cons: The expo was just so-so. The gal handing me my bag and bib had no idea what she was doing and said so.
The app that was supposed to keep my friends and family alerted to my location was a flop. It didn't work after.17 miles, they thought I had died or broken a leg or something.
There were a LOT of half marathoners who started at the same time. This made for a crowded, and at times noisy, route for the first 10 miles or so. I prefer to run solo and in peace, so this took some getting used to.
Overall this was a great experience, I'm glad I did it, and would recommend this race to anyone.
By: Matthew M.
Posted: April 29, 2017
Fun, challenging race!
Well-run race! Most of the marathon course was pretty, some boring suburban 'blah', but that is the case with every marathon I've ran. The aid stations were amazing and the airline themed medal was very unique. Alaska Airlines (best airline ever!!!) did a great job of sponsoring the race.
Living at an elevation of about 500 feet, SLC's elevation took more out of me than I expected and I ran a truly atrocious time. Still, I was able to visit a beautiful city and had a great time running a fun race, definitely recommend to others!
By: Eddie G.
Posted: April 24, 2017
Nicely organized event
I got into the race nearly a year in advance and paid less than $3 a mile. The value, therefore, was a steal for me. Hard to find marathons for that price.
The Expo was fairly small but is paired with a Fitness expo. Packet pickup was simple and efficient. The swag bag was filled with goodies and the shirt was nicely designed. Race communication was well done.
Taking the TRAX system was the way to go. It drops you right off at the starting line (and a station is near the finish line as well). The bathroom situation at the start was good although there were lines of 10 - 12 people deep 15 minutes before the race. The race started on time and I was running within 10 minutes of the race's actual start.
The first 8 miles or so are mostly downhill and absolutely beautiful. Running by the downtown area and the stately mansions was a treat. The latter part of the race is primarily run through residential areas. It isn't the most exciting but the scenery did change and I liked the parks that we ran around.
Despite the race's net downhill change this course is challenging. There are plenty of rolling hills and small inclines that will challenge you. I wouldn't describe it as a fast course and if you aren't used to the 4000+ elevation, it'll will take you by surprise.
Course support was awesome. There were plenty of aid stations and most of them had gels. If I were to run this race again, I don't think I would carry any of my own. I've never seen more gels offered at a race. My one small complaint was that the mile markers seemed off from the start. Mile 3, for instance, was at mile 3.22. Most everyone I talked to had a similar reporting via their Garmin. However, at mile 25 the markers made sense again. I ran about 26.32 miles for the day. The course was marshaled well (they had a police officer at every single intersection) and I felt safe running throughout the city.
Finish line spread was typical offerings. I wish they had had some soda. There was water, some Gatorade (looked like they were running out though), popsicles and a few snacks. I got a good amount of cheering as I crossed the finish line but the majority of runners are half marathoners so the finish area was pretty thin. Crowd support on the course was nice - mostly locals sitting in their front yards. The volunteers were awesome and rallied you on as well.
I would run this race again. It has the feeling of a big city marathon without all the big city headaches. If you sign up far enough in advance, the price is well worth it. I have very few complaints and was impressed with the experience I received. It is a worthy race to run for Utah.
By: Jennifer Tanko
Posted: April 17, 2016
Scenic, Intimate Marathon
I ran my first marathon in SLC and had a fantastic time. Although this was my first 26.2, I have been running shorter distances for years, so I feel that I can give some helpful input for this race.
It should first be noted that if you are someone who needs a lot of crowd support and runner camaraderie during an event, this is not the race for you! The full marathon is very small (<1,000 runners) and by the time you're finishing, the crowds have mostly dispersed. When you separate from the half marathoners at mile 9, you are mostly by yourself for the race as the runners are very spread out. I personally liked this - it allowed me to focus on the UNBELIEVABLE scenery and the personal journey that brought me to the course.
There were SO many people at each aid stations (of which there were plenty) and they would greet you by name as they offered water and gatorade. There were also tons of porta-potties - at no point did I ever have to wait in a line for one.
I liked the shirt and medal, and the post-race festival was pretty decent with a live band and a lot of tents. I am very much looking forward to seeing the photos, which are COMPLIMENTARY! Most of the races I run are NYRR or RunDisney, so that blows my mind.
In sum, I thought this was a lovely race. I registered almost a year in advance, and registration was under $100. A marathon is a great way to see this beautiful city, but I would only consider this if you are someone who can appreciate a quieter, more meditative environment.
By: Amy D.
Posted: April 26, 2014
Better course
This was a better course than last year-there was some open space, and a meander through downtown, past the governor's house, SLC temple, a BEAUTIFUL park, and other pretty sights. The course could be hilly, but that doesn't bother me and I don't understand how people who don't like hills live in the world. The world is hilly :)
After the half marathoners left, my life improved. There were no lines at the toilets!
There was plenty of gu on the course and I even got to try a new flavor-salted caramel!
It was a stunning time of year in SLC with the spring flowers and buds on the trees and view of the mountains. The mormans (of which I met many) are also so sweet and welcoming.
Drawbacks-food at the finish was subpar. Also the logistics of parking and taking the tram were ambiguous on the website. My uncle ended up driving me. And, the race started 10 minutes late! When I have to drive 550 miles after the race, I didn't appreciate accommodating the late-comers. I managed to make the race on time, and other people should too. If they cannot, race directors should not postpone, after all, it is chip timed.
Overall, it was a very pleasant experience :)
By: Tasha B.
Posted: April 24, 2014
Beautiful Scenic route
Although, this was my first time to Salt Lake City and there were many 'firsts' for this trip, I couldn't have happier! This was my 24th marathon in the states, so I feel like I've seen and done a few to say that is in my top 5.
Pros:
Well organized transportation to the start line. Even though the train was a little late, they held the start gun for us.
Great volunteer support.
Always had plenty of water and powerade/ gatorade. They had both, which I've never seen before.
The course was challenging but beautiful in most places. They blocked off entire boulevards downtown for the marathoners. You have views of the mountains where ever you are on the course.
Well organized finish line and finish area.
Loads of opportunities for photos.
Cons:
At the very begininig of the race, it bottlenecks on a hill, but its short.
There wasn't a lot of food giving to us post-race.
Although, it appears to be mostly downhill, it is challenging. I would recommend this marathon to any intermediate runner or if you are coming from a similar altitude.
By: Yvonne G.
Posted: January 08, 2014
Choose another UT marathon...
Ran Salt Lake City in the hopes of enjoying a little bit of the city during the race. Not so much - just a course through the burbs, on the highway and pretty miserable.
At the expo and on the website it suggested taking the Trax to the starting line. Our train never came - I guess that line was not running that morning and there was no signage or warning to that effect. We had to run 2 miles to the start, missing the beginning of the race all together. The shuttle back to the trax to our hotel took forever and with no heat blankets at the end my lips were blue by the time I got to the hotel. Signs at the train station would have been very helpful for any out of town guests as we were very confused.
The shirt & Medal were nice and it was good to get another state accomplished but when I hear such great things about other UT races I wish I had tried something a little more off the beaten path.
By: Fred F.
Posted: August 12, 2013
More than expected.
I had heard about some of the issues in the past so I was very reluctant to run this one. I'm glad I did. The course was great, fans supportive despite it raining for the better part of the marathon, tables well-stocked with drinks, gels, etc., and plenty of porta-potties along the course. This was a week after Boston and there was a sense of foreboding, but marathon went off without a hitch. Great volunteers. I have already registered for next year. Can't wait.
By: Anne L.
Posted: May 17, 2013
A well organized race
The details and planning that went into every aspect of the race was well thought out from the route, water stations to the Boston tributes and the level of security (the race was 1-week after Boston 2013). The spectators were out there cheering us on despite the rain and cold weather and it was touching to see so many Boston tributes along the course. A very well-run race. I would recommend it to anyone travelling to the area or a nearby area.
By: John Eng
Posted: April 26, 2013
Small Marathon with Great Camaraderie
It was a pretty cool day in the mid-40's and hard rain for the races. About 900 marathoners and about 4,000 half marathoners.
Logistics - Not the easiest but still can be done without a car. You take the TRAX (Salt Lake's light rail system) to the start which is about 20 minutes ride. The train I was on was extremely packed. The finish at Liberty Park means you need to take their shuttle bus to the Ball Park TRAX station which is then about another 5-10 minute ride back to downtown. The hotels are about a half mile away from the Convention Center.
The start is shared by both the Half and Full marathoners. Unfortunately, most of the runners chose to ignore the signs on where to line up. This resulted in spending the first mile and a half zig zagging past walkers and slow runners who decided to line up near the front.
Since SLC was the first major city marathon following the Boston Marathon bombings, they had a nice tribute. First there was a moment of silence followed by a rendition of 'Sweet Caroline'.
The first 3 or so miles of this race has some steep downhills as you are coming off the mountain. After that, the course can be described as rolling with good stretches of flat. One thing that struck me about this race was the tremendous camaraderie between the runners. On the out and backs, the runners on the out portions were exchanging high fives with the runners on the back portions. Throughout the whole race, there were so many shouts of encouragement from my fellow runners. I was so touched by the feeling of concern, enthusiasm, consideration and friendliness from the fellow runners that this turned out to be one of my most memorable marathons of the 26 ones that I have run.
A decent amount of enthusiastic spectators. Not a lot but I assume the numbers were down because of the rain. SLC Police did an excellent job of traffic control. Hydration stations were well run and frequent. However, the first few stations were crowded because of the half. I suggest carrying a small water bottle with you to get you past the first few stations. After about Mile 8 when the half and full marathoners diverge, this is not an issue.
At the finish, food offered was bagged pretzels, bananas, water, beer, gatorade, cookies and lots of yogurt. Several shuttle buses were waiting bringing you to the Ball Park TRAX station.
So if you are looking for a somewhat smaller marathon in a city whose backdrop is surrounded by beautiful mountains, Salt Lake City is a fine choice.
By: Jason M.
Posted: April 22, 2013
hmmmmmmm?
I was excited to run this marathon. Little mistakes kept happening, which I will explain further down that impacted my view of it. It was a cool and rainy run, and I was impressed with the voluteers and law enforcement helping out. Extra security was in place since Boston, but it did not have a negative impact on the experience at all and those providing the security were all awsome. The medal was nice also as were all of the people.
Now here are the little things that took away from the experience: 1) Very small expo for an event of this size, 2) No gear check bag provided, 3) Host hotel said they had a shuttle to take us to the start (in reality it just dropped of off at a light rail station and then we took that to the start, 4) Host hotel said they would have a shuttle at the finish area to bring us back to the hotel (in reality the shuttle took us from the finish area to a light rail station and had to take that back to the hotel area and walk the rest of the way), 5) Gear check bags were left out in the rain at the finish area, 6) No sign saying where gear check was at the start, 7) Poor signs saying where the shuttle at the finish was, 8) The pasta dinner was good, but it was at a park near the finish the night before the marathon, I think having it at the expo location would be better for a few reasons and 9) hard to find friends/family after the marathon as there was no designated 'family area' like a lot of marathons have.
I know and appreciate what it takes to put on a marathon, but for one what has been going for a while I would expect better. I am still glad I went, but would not run it again.
By: Nic F.
Posted: April 21, 2013
Love this one!
I ran this half marathon in 2011 and again this year (2013). I loved both years, despite the poor weather this year. The expo was great, the race is a fun atmosphere. Even in the pouring rain, there were great spectators!! Transportation to the start was easy. Water stations were adequate. I loved the shirt this year,though they were sized very small and I was not allowed to exchange at the expo. The swag bags were not very impressive, but there were plenty of freebies at the expo to make up for it. And I have to say.....there is way too much hype for the Ogden Marathon and I much prefer to do SLC over Ogden. Looking forward to 2014!!!
By: Mitchell S.
Posted: March 14, 2013
race great; organizers poor
You pay $95 or more to run a marathon and all you get in the 'goodie' bag is ads for more races sponsored by same organization??? That's not a goody bag! Course is nice and easy; good support at tables. NO gu or powergel, though. CHEAPO!
By: Kyle O.
Posted: October 25, 2012
Great People, Great views, a great time.
I had the oppurtunity to run the Salt Lake City Marathon and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. It definitley made a memory for me. The crowds and fans were great, the support throughout the course was also great. One thing to be prepared for is that Salt Lake City sits around 4,200-4,300 feet. Keep that in mind as well as the course has a rather large elevation change throughout, something to keep in mind when you are training for it.
Overall it was a great time.
By: Michelle P.
Posted: April 26, 2012
I loved this race
I was pleasantly surprised how wonderful this race was. So well organized, and all the volunteers were friendly. Salt Lake City is beautiful, the snow-covered mountains are eye candy. For not having had much time to organize this race, the director(s) did a great job.
By: Runner Bob S.
Posted: April 26, 2012
Nice venue, but a little disjointed
Salt Lake City is a great host city and this marathon had a lot going for it in it's favor. The main issue for 2012 was the transition from Devine race direction to the new owners of the race and the uneasiness that it gave us 'out of towners' that would fly in to the race, not knowing if the event was actually going to go off.
The race did go off and although communication of the details was limited, it actually went very smoothly. No race goodie bag and no information sheet telling you how to get a drop bag, where the drop would be, what train to take to the start, etc., which created some unnecessary worry.
The race overall was very scenic once you get off the main hwy thru town and although the temperatures were high, no water station I encountered ran out of fluids. Course is downhill and flat, but there was a significant incline from about mile 11.5 to past the half marathon point and one of about three blocks leading up to the temple at the end before turning left and providing a nice downhill to the Union Pacific train station (little over 1/4mile).
Hopefully the race direction ownership is settled and this race can provide a more secure feeling in the future for those of us that had to travel to the event and were told that even if it is cancelled, there will be no refund. In addition to providing more information, the race directors need to detail the course map better, as very few streets were labeled and previewing the course was difficult.
Kudos to the police department for blocking every cross street on the course. From my experience in many marathons, I have to say that this race had the best police protection of any event I have entered, and logistically, there were a lot of cross streets encountered. The small but enthusiastic crowds were also appreciated as well as the volunteers at all the aid stations.
We stayed at a Hampton Inn downtown and it was very convenient to the expo, to catch the TRAX to the start and about a 4block walk back from the finish as well as an indoor pool and hot tub that came in handy before and after the race. The location is also convenient to the airport. For a Saturday race with an early start, I would think this would be a good choice for those wanting to do a double in one weekend.
By: Mark W.
Posted: April 22, 2012
Great race
It was my first visit to Salt Lake City and I thoroughly enjoyed the experience. I was a bit worried about the change of organization so close to the race date, but it was probably one of the better organized marathons that I have run.
Pros:
Great city, easy course
Well staffed aid stations and plenty of police support at all road crossings
Beautiful medal
Small expo (which I personally prefer)
Cons:
So-so t-shirt
A race held on Saturday morning. This made it extremely difficult for out of towners to get to the Friday expo before 7pm.
Overall, great race. Thank you SLC!
By: Jim R.
Posted: June 24, 2011
Important things done right, but...
To a great degree, the Salt Lake City marathon was a positive experience. The important things (those related to the race itself) were done right, but there were too many smaller (and admittedly less important) things that Devine got wrong, suggesting a lack of customer focus and doing things on the cheap.
First the good news:
1. The scenery at the beginning of the course was beautiful. Running with the Wasatch Mountains in the background was a real treat for this flatlander from the east.
2. TRAXX ran at increased frequency, making it easier to get to the start line. It was crowded, but nothing out of the ordinary for a Metro rider from Washington, DC.
3. Packet pick up was a breeze and the volunteers were helpful and friendly.
4. Plenty of sports drink and water handed out by friendly volunteers.
5. Gear pick up was great-the handlers saw me coming and had my bag ready when I arrived. They were also very friendly (seems to be a pattern).
Now the not so good news.
1. It took me 3 emails (which were never responded to) and 3 phone calls to get Devine to send my 'age group award' What was it? A generic finisher's medal-not a special age group award medal, but the common garden variety finisher's medal. In each of the 6 communications, I clearly stated that I was looking for my age group award. This was quite disappointing and has left a sour taste in my mouth about the race as a whole.
2. No pace groups. In an event of this size, pace groups are the norm. Why not this one?
3. The goody bags were about what you'd expect from a neighborhood 5k, not from a race of this size. The bags contained a few fliers hawking goods and services-nothing else. What's the point?
4. The goody bags were supposed to be used as the gear drop bags, according to the event web site, but the bags were flimsy plastic shopping bags. Mine was already ripping when I left the expo. To its credit, Devine did offer sturdy gear bags and permanent markers at the gear drop off point, but there was no way that we would know this in advance.
5. The finisher's medal was a nice design, but exceedingly generic. The medal did not specify the year or date of the race-but there was '2011' on the neck ribbon. Nothing really wrong with this, but it gave the sense of medals on the cheap-they could reuse the same medal next year and just substitute a new ribbon. It sent the wrong message.
By: R. M.
Posted: April 20, 2011
2011 Nice Work!
Ran the 1/2 marathon this year, and I have to say that the race organizers stepped it up this year. The one area that needed attention, the clothing bag pick up, was organized and handled much better than in the prior two years - and that makes a huge difference. Course was well marked. Aid station at mile 8 for the 1/2 marathoners needs a little attention spacing-wise and help with both water and PowerAde distribution. Post-race support was very good. A great early-season event.
All in all, very good. Volunteer effort was excellent and spectators were great, as always.
By: James Patterson
Posted: April 18, 2011
Fun course, need more options at aid stations
This was my third half marathon. I made it to Ogden and Pocatello in 2010. This one ranked right in the middle of those two.
The Good: the course was entertaining and beautiful for someone who doesn't know Salt Lake all that well. It was a nice representation of all that SLC seems to be about. Started up at the University of Utah, wound its way through quaint neighborhoods, the Sugarhouse area and ended appropriately downtown with a jaunt past Temple Square and the Gateway Plaza. As far as organization goes, it was pretty well done. TRAX was easy to use (if you got on early enough) and post-race bag pickup was efficient as well.
The Not So Good: Even the Pocatello Half Marathon I ran in offered Gu, bananas and orange slices at aid stations. For an event of this size, I really was appalled there was no more than just water and Powerade along the course. Especially since there was so much food at the end. Shift some money and resources to the aid stations rather than having so much food at the end. The spectatorship was a little underwhelming as well. Not much better than at Pocatello, and that's saying a lot considering the contrast in population. Also, the shirt this year was absolutely hideous. I would be embarrassed to use it as a car-washing rag, let alone run in it. Awful mustard yellow color with a huge sticker on the front. A huge disappointment.
By: Gigi S.
Posted: April 18, 2011
Nothing spectacular, but a good race
This is a good race, but I'm not sure I'd do it again, especially considering how expensive it is. The course is nice, although a little boring at certain points. The weather is perfect this time of year, and the volunteers and spectators are great. My only complaints are that there are no gels or other type of fuel besides PowerAde at the aid stations (for the price of the marathon, there should've been SOMETHING else available), and that the marathoners have to weave around the walkers and half marathoners for the first part of the run. Different start times for the half and full marathon would help alleviate that. It's hard to find your groove when you're weaving around other runners/walkers. Overall, a good, well-organized run, though.
By: Drew L.
Posted: April 16, 2011
Not worth the cost; poorly organized.
Devine appears to care about running the race on a shoestring budget. This could be a great race, but under the current race management I doubt the future. I will forward my comments to the mayor; we need change in 2012 - a new race director is in order. No potholes were marked on the course. I saw two people twist ankles. Not enough porta-potties. Long lines at every aid station and the beginning. No food or GU on the race course (except provided by spectators). For 90 bucks I would expect more. But Devine has had 8 years to run this race, and I see little improvement in that time.
I will not run this race again, and advise other to skip this one next year.
By: Brian H.
Posted: April 16, 2011
Decent marathon
This is the second year I have run this marathon. I will summarize pluses and minuses.
Pluses:
Numerous port-a-potties
Great volunteers
Decent course
Minuses:
Can be expensive if you sign up late
Aid stations only have Gatorade and water (just be aware)
Fan support is kind of weak, in my opinion
Weak schwag
Poor t-shirt design
Overall, it was an okay marathon. I wrote a much stronger positive review last year, but after doing other marathons in Utah and elsewhere, I see that you pay a lot for not much in return. I am just not sure where all the money goes. I spent $95 and signed up over two months in advance. I almost would rather just pay the great volunteers out of my own pocket. The schwag was nothing compared to what I have received at cheaper marathons and the shirt this year looked like a bib painted on a t-shirt. We didn't even receive safety pins in our grab bag. The medal was pretty cool, I have to admit. I am from Salt Lake City and some of the fans were great, but others just kind of stared at you while you passed. At the end in the Gateway, I could have heard a pin drop as I came across the finish line. Kind of disappointing.
There were some great people who were handing out oranges, bananas and other things, and I am so thankful to those people. There was an ice cream stand at mile 8 and I had a beer at mile 21 at the "temptation station," which really hit the spot. My complaints are probably nit-picky, but I just think this marathon is very close to being great if they just stretched your dollar a little more and the fans could be a little more supportive of the runners and this race.
Course: The course is beautiful just because of the mountains in the background, but there are not many turns and in several areas you end up just going straight down the same road for quite a while. Didn't bother me, but it might be more interesting if we did a few more turns. First half is pretty much gradually downhill. The last 13 are pretty much flat, with a bit of an uphill at the end as you come up State Street, where many people were forced to walk.
I would advise signing up super early if you want to do this marathon. I only spent $65 last year and felt like it was worth every penny. Maybe I am just bitter that I signed up too late....
By: Roy G.
Posted: May 27, 2010
Another good job!
This was my second SLC Marathon. I really like this event and will be back again. Aid stations were top notch. Police did a phenomenal job keeping us safe. My only complaint is that full marathoners make a loop through a park and merge with slower half-marathoners who fill the street. It is hard to navigate that section and find your groove. Yes, the hill in mile 24 is hard - but it's more mentally hard than physically hard. Finish is great! Good shirt again. Pretty good medal. While I prefer the Ogden Marathon, this one is definitely worth it.
By: Scott Palmer
Posted: May 13, 2010
Good Marathon
The course elevation chart may be a little off. That two-mile hill at the end was gradual, but I'm sure it gained more elevation than the marathon website showed. (If not, it sure appeared that way). There was a special aid station for quitters somewhere around mile 17 - I think. It was hilarious. The sign read, "you know you want to quit," and they were handing out shots of what looked like Whiskey in dixie cups to anyone who would simply give up. That was so funny that I laughed for about 2 miles. Salt Lake is clean, and since they hosted the Winter Olympics in 2002, it is really a beautiful city to run.
By: Seth D.
Posted: May 03, 2010
Not Utah's Best
All in all the event was fine, but it is clearly eclipsed by at least three other marathons in Utah for various reasons.
The expo was very disappointing - there was almost nothing there.
I did not find the pasta party, and people/runners simply were not hanging around on Friday before the race. By not holding the expo on Saturday, people where either going home from or coming from work, which limited the time runners had to hang around and socialize. I much prefer a Sunday race, since it makes the event feel like it is the entire weekend. The course was nice enough and gave you a pretty good tour of Salt Lake City. The police support was first-rate, but if they could find a way to spread the decline over a larger part of the course instead of all at once at the race start, it would be nice. The spectators were sparse but enthusiastic.
My real complaint was the organization. The post-race handling of the checked bags was very poor.
This is a event in a first-rate city which has too much potential to be great not to have someone put some real time and effort into ramping it up to create a truly top-notch event. Salt Lake City should not play second fiddle to Saint George and Ogden.
By: Scott A.
Posted: April 24, 2010
Well-Organized Marathon and Plan to Return
Thank you to the race organizers and volunteers who made this year's marathon (2010) a great experience.
Course: I loved the race course. State Street and South Temple ARE Salt Lake and it is a rush and a privilege to be able to run on them. The course on State Street really only starts to rise for one block (between 1st South and South Temple) and then it is downhill the rest of the way. PLEASE do not change this. The previous finish via 4th Street/West Temple/2nd Street was not interesting or important to me. Running by Temple Square was an honor.
Organization: This marathon is as well organized as any race I have been a part of. They do a superb job. This holds true for each of the three years I have participated in this marathon.
Spectators: Fewer than past years. However, the ones who were there were very helpful. Thank you to those who gave the oranges at mile 10 and around mile 20.
Constructive Suggestions (not criticisms):
1) I would like to split off from all of the half-marathoners sooner. This may involve altering the start times by 15-30 minutes between the marathon/half-marathon. The same aid stations could still be used and it should not cause significantly more congestion of the finish of the two races at Gateway.
2) With the appearance fees paid in the past to elite athletes now eliminated, I would like to see the entry fee lowered to be closer to those of other marathons in Utah. It is the same now as it was during those years of elite runners. I think this will attract more runners to the marathon.
Summary: A great marathon and it is my hope to be able to return annually for many more years to come.
By: Darrel H.
Posted: April 20, 2010
Good but not great
This was a good marathon, but not my favorite. I can't complain about the organization or volunteers at all. The volunteers were prepared, happy, and a joy to be around. Using the Trax system to get to the start is a great, no-stress way to move everyone. The course was generally flat to downhill and I enjoyed the areas that we ran through. The crowd was enthusiastic, but sparse for a big-city marathon. I did enjoy running into the Gateway and the crowd that was there. The food after the marathon was plentiful and good. I really enjoyed the burritos that were being passed out. I have heard that there was a problem with the bag pickup, but I arrived after the majority of the half runners and mine was found quickly
With just over 1,000 running the marathon and over 4,600 running the half-marathon, the marathon felt like an afterthought at times. There were no pace markers to help people start with others going the same speed. That made for a slow start. At mile four the marathon split from the half and then joined back up at the same spot after making a mile-loop around a park. This put us with a lot of slower runners that we needed to navigate around. Although I don't use GU, some of the other runners I was with were looking for it or some other food at the aid stations.
The runners' area was a parking lot that required a long walk to get through. There was no place to lie down or stretch without doing it on the warm asphalt. A grassy area would have been nice. It was also too far from the course to watch others finish without leaving the runners' area.
These are small complaints, but enough that I will go to a different spring marathon next year.
By: Daron C.
Posted: April 18, 2010
Very good experience
This was the fifth year I've run the Salt Lake City Marathon. The fact I keep doing it says it all - they do a very nice job. The organization is excellent. The shirt and medal are very attractive.
The course is generally pretty good. There's the hill at the end, which had most people walking up it at mile 24.5, and a section where you run on a "freeway" for a couple of miles, but the rest of it is very scenic and pleasant.
There are not a lot of fans, but those who are there are enthusiastic.
The volunteers are very supportive and helpful. If there were a special ranking for them, I'd give 5+ stars.
I'll run this race again, but's it's been disappointing to see fewer and fewer marathoners at the race each year. I think there were only about 1,100 this year - much fewer than the first year I ran the race. I think the half-marathon, which shares the marathon course for the first 7 miles, is slowly eating up the marathon. That said, it is still a very good experience.
By: Cheri R.
Posted: April 18, 2010
Nice Course in Friendly City
This was fairly well organized but I would suggest the organizers add some sort of food (gel or bananas?) on the course. I looked for gel at every aid station; there wasn't any. The spectators were few but very friendly. A big shout-out to the two who passed out orange slices around mile 10. I LOVE YOU GUYS!!! The course was awesome, very beautiful and through interesting sections of town. I'm used to running through a city's seedier districts and this one was no different. I don't expect a city to shut down its best and busiest streets. I loved the finish at the Gateway. The police did an EXCELLENT job of keeping runners and traffic separate. Overall, I would recommend this one to anyone.
By: Ravindra G.
Posted: April 18, 2010
Harder than I thought
My third marathon, and the hardest yet for me. Seeing the course elevation, I imagined it to be mostly downhill. The downhill is pretty much done in the first 10 miles, and then you get some ups and downs. The 25th mile was the hardest since you can see the road sloping up. Very well organized with police at every intersection making sure the runners were safe. Got a little warm after 10:30 a.m.
By: Lloyd H.
Posted: April 18, 2010
Great potential with better organization
Great course through the city of Salt Lake. The net elevation drops about 700 feet, mostly in the first half of the race. The course ends with a lot of spectators at the Gateway. Some organizational flaws that can be easily corrected in the future: ran out of water for slower runners at some aid stations, had to wait in line for 1-2 hours for gear bag after the race, awards ceremony delayed over an hour and a half because of timing glitch (that was eventually corrected). Salt Lake City is a terrific venue for a marathon and this race has a lot of potential, with a little more attention to details.
On a more positive note, the course was well laid out and the officers did a nice job directing traffic. The aid stations were good, except the ones that ran out of both water and Gatorade. They had good food at the end of the race.
By: Brian H.
Posted: April 17, 2010
Good first marathon, minor negatives
This was my first marathon, and overall I think it was very well run. The first half of the marathon was great, with some very scenic views going through Holladay and running mostly downhill. The second half of the marathon wasn't great, as you go down Foothill, which is just a major road and not quite as scenic. The last 2 miles were not fun as you run down State Street and slightly go uphill at the end. To be honest, the hill wasn't bad; it was just that I live in SLC and State Street is not the most scenic way to end a marathon. Food at the end was abundant and plentiful for all, and stations every 1-2 miles were great and had plenty of people helping to hand out Gatorade or water. I didn't see any gels but was not stopping for very long at the stop stations. There were a few times that there was a car on the course, but the police did a good job of getting them off right away. Overall, not a bad marathon with good organization. I just think the course could have been planned a little bit better.
By: Karen A.
Posted: February 17, 2010
A fun half marathon
We ran the half in 2009. It was well organized. We were able to get to the race expo/package pick-up easily, we liked the Traxx system very much, and the finish line was very nice in the outdoor downtown mall area. The Traxx ride is free in the downtown area, so we hopped on it afterward to go back to our hotel. I would run this race again.
By: Ed S.
Posted: May 03, 2009
Great Tour of SLC
I don't know what all the grumbling is about. I thought they pulled-off an excellent event in 2009. I've run both the SLC Half and the marathon. I ran the half this year. The half is the superior event in my opinion, but it wouldn't be without the full marathon at the same time. The full marathon has a tedious section around 5000 south. I could do without that section. I saw some complaints about the section on State Street; sure, there are a few cars, and it's gradual uphill, but that's State Street. It is the "main drag" of Salt Lake City. I thought that was the best part, a big finish. There's a lot of history there. Running up toward the Eagle Gate with the state capitol and downtown rising right there... it's awe-inspiring. State Street and Temple Square ARE Salt Lake City.
You could not ask for a more SLC-representative route, with the U of U, Sugarhouse, Holladay-Murray Blvd., Liberty Park, Eagle Gate, Brigham's house, his statue (hand outstretched toward the bank, back toward the temple), Hotel Utah, Main Street Plaza, Temple Square, then a big finish in the Gateway. It was great. Good finish line food. Bag pick-up was standard. Medal was above average; at least it was a "metal" medal (Ogden's was plastic last year). Want the full marathon experience? Run SLC on Saturday and Boston on Monday; they are timed perfectly for that.
By: Susan C.
Posted: April 27, 2009
Great race except police let cars onto the course
I ran the Las Vegas marathon in December 2008 and that is how I heard about the Salt Lake City race. Overall I am happy with the experience but I will likely not return next year because the course was supposed to be closed to traffic for 6 hours. I finished well within that time and yet had to contend with police waving cars through intersections while other runners and I were already in the intersection. The Saturday scheduling of the race has to be questioned. Marathoners should not have to compete with traffic.
By: Bruin B.
Posted: April 23, 2009
Overall Great Experience
I ran the SLC Marathon for the first time and was unsure if this marathon would be a good one, since I read the comments religiously for many marathons I do from MarathonGuide. But I was pleasantly surprised with Devine. I have ran LA Marathon 10 times and remember how much I disliked some of the changes Devine implemented, but the SLC Marathon was great.
The course at 4,500-foot elevation was great, with not too many turns (so it doesn't slow down your momentum) but it had enough turns to distract the mind.
I didn't think it was difficult at all. There may be a couple miles that have a slight uphill, but it only added about 15 seconds to those mile splits. I made it up at the end because I like to finish my marathons hard.
Fluid stations had enough of both water and Gatorade and enough volunteers.
Not sure if it was volunteers only or spectators too, but orange slices were given a few times throughout the later portion of the course and I LOVE eating oranges on my run! Thanks, volunteers and/or spectators.
The density of spectators was not that great in comparison to more urban marathons, but it is understandable as it's a relatively small marathon with about 1,000 finishers.
Weather in SLC was perfect for me around 50-60 degrees F in April. Great for marathoning!
The medal was fine. I've done 26 marathons and I'm 24. I've seen smaller even at the Rome Marathon but this one was good. Yeah, Devine put their name on the ribbon that goes around the neck, but no big deal. It is nowhere to be found on the medal itself.
I finished in 3:42:00, only a few minutes from my PR, so if you are trained for the elevation, this race is a fun race. I had a great time!
By: Kerry Green
Posted: April 22, 2009
Good overall race
With all of Devine's financial troubles, at least those perceived by the media, I was momentarily concerned that the race might be canceled. To my pleasant surprise, Devine pulled off an awesome race. I agree with previous comments regarding the long hill after mile 24 - I wasn't expecting it! Other than that, the course was beautiful; the crowd, though small, was great; and the weather was absolutely perfect. I even enjoyed the pre-race gospel music.
My small recommendation for Devine, should they be reviewing these comments, is that they consider staggering the half-marathon and marathon starts. Towards the end of my race, I had to politely (perhaps impolitely at times?) excuse myself before passing slower half-marathoners who occasionally walked in 4's (side by side by side by side). I'm all about everybody getting a chance to run, but finishing the last 10K of a marathon in zigzag fashion isn't preferred.
That said, I would run this race again in a heartbeat.
By: Steve H.
Posted: April 20, 2009
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
This race can adequately be summarized by the following: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly.
The Good - Packet pickup was smooth, volunteers were helpful, aid stations were plentiful and the volunteers at them were well trained. The race number, shirt and medal were all pretty decent. There were plenty of post-race refreshments. The course itself was runner-friendly.
The Bad - UTA in the morning was way behind schedule and didn't run enough trains to properly serve the number of runners. A train arrived full just a couple of minutes before the start. The choir that sang the national anthem was absolutely horrible. We're talking Rosanne Barr-bad. They were an embarrassment. Also, they had the marathon and half-marathon merging together at 6 miles and then again around 21. I had to dodge and weave around walkers who were absolutely clueless that the race is about running, not walking. Step aside, PLEASE!!
The Ugly - Post-race baggage pick up. Good GOD!! Who was the idiot who thought it was a good idea to use color-coded stickers IN ADDITION to the race number. WHAT??? The race number is a pretty simple (almost idiot proof) system. Instead, the volunteers had the runners search for their own bags. Absolutely ridiculous.
Unless they fire the person who came up with that system, there is no way I would ever run this marathon again.
By: John SLC
Posted: April 20, 2009
First-time runner, great experience!
Maybe my opinion is what it is because this was my first time running in a marathon event - I don't know. I ran the half marathon this year for Salt Lake City and I fell in love with it.
I thought it was well organized, and as a first-time runner, I had no problem getting started, registered, picking up my stuff, etc. I used the Trax system to get up to the starting line and that worked well, but it was a bit crowded. The starting line had a gospel choir going on, which I actually enjoyed, but everyone's taste in music will vary. It was an upbeat choir though, nothing that would put you to sleep. The only recommendation at the starting area is to maybe add more bathrooms, as the lines were a bit long and slow in moving.
I thought the course was well done, and it takes you on a beautiful tour of the Salt Lake valley. The course was mostly flat, with some light downhill running and a little uphill - nothing crazy, and great for first-time runners. I thought there could have been an extra aid station or two, for those of us depending on them, but all in all they did a pretty good job. There was water and/or Gatorade at every single stop, enough for all the runners. They also had easy-to-see mile markers and several timers throughout the course, giving you a good idea of what your pace is... especially for those of us who lost their watch a few days before the race, haha.
When I finished, there was plenty of water and medals available. I finished in 2 hours and 12 minutes, but about 2.5 hours after the race had started. I didn't check out the other amenities, but from what I was told, they did a good job providing for everyone.
The spectators were great! I think throughout the course there could have been more, but there were still a good number of them out. The people at the aid stations were also very generous and nice. The finish line area was packed with people cheering and waving the runners on; even the police who were handling traffic were good sports about cheering runners on, so that part was very great.
I enjoyed it enough that I intend to run it again next year, and my family members had such a great time cheering me on and being part of the crowd that even they want to get involved and run next year.
There is not much I would change about this event. It was straightforward - no problems, lots of fun, great spectators, and even the weather was amazing.
By: Abby C.
Posted: April 20, 2009
A nice race
I was pleased with this race. A nice size, with overall good organization. The shuttle (the local light rail) was a bit crowded even for those allowing nearly 2 hours before start time, but I had plenty of time to get to the start and be on time. I stayed at one of the host hotels, which was very accommodating and close to the finish. Great crowd support evenly spread throughout the course, and plenty of water/Gatorade for all. Expo was laid out very well, and was also very close to the finish and host hotels. The city itself was undergoing a lot of construction, which took a bit away from the scenery, but somehow it still ended up being a beautiful course. I hope this race continues. It's a great race, it's easy to fly to, even from the East Coast, and it was a pleasant experience. My only regret is that I had to return quickly. I would have loved to stay longer and explore! Thanks to all of the volunteers and everyone who helped make this a great race.
By: michael b.
Posted: April 20, 2009
Have run it 3 times... considering a 4th!
I have run this race three times now, so, obviously, I am a big fan. This is one of the most beautiful courses I've run, out of 25 marathons. Running along the base of the snow-capped Wasatch Mountains is an awesome way to start the day. I've heard a lot about Devine Racing's recent financial problems but must say there was no evidence of troubles along the course. The shirts were nice, as were the finisher's medals. The volunteers were cheerful and efficient, and the crowd support has certainly grown over the past six years. The only thing I don't like is the climb up State Street at the end. I wish it were downhill instead!! Congrats to Devine, volunteers and all of the marathon finishers.
By: Kate L.
Posted: April 19, 2009
Nice course but I should have driven it first
Everything I read about the course said it was pretty flat, with a small all-around elevation drop. There were some uphills, but the first half had more downhills, and they were steeper than I expected. Thus, IT band issues I had never encountered before presented themselves at about mile 4 and remained steady end grew ever stronger through to the finish! Otherwise, a nice/well organized course/race. The TRAX transport was completely packed, but it got us there. Start line "johns" were too few to accommodate the sudden influx of the packed TRAX passengers who were already running late; thus there was no time to go before the gun! Best word of advice: Take the early train!
This is the largest race I've run so far. I'm used to a handful of fabulous fans leapfrogging the runners in a van and cheering throughout the course, so the many fans here were a WONDERFUL novelty to me. Thanks, SLC.
By: Daron C.
Posted: April 19, 2009
Very Solid Race
If you like snow-capped mountains, sunny skies, moderate temperatures, a relatively easy course, and good organization, this race is for you. If you need lots of spectators to cheer you on, this is not the race for you. There are people out on the course to cheer you on, but not a lot of them. I found the organization to be flawless. The course is very gentle and interesting, with tremendous views - with the exception of a long hill after mile 24 that comes at the wrong time in a race. The finish line is well done, with lots of food. I've run 31 marathons, and this one is very solid. I'd recommend it highly.
By: Kelley C.
Posted: April 19, 2009
Nice race - beautiful surroundings
This was my 3rd marathon. I was amazed at the organization for smoothly running an early start marathon, regular marathon, half, bike tour, and 5K. The course was beautiful. It had some rolling hills, the longest being around mile 19 or 20 - it seemed to go on forever. The expo and pasta dinner were small but nice. The spectators were plentiful and enthusiastic. My only complaint was that there was no GU available as advertised - apparently a distributor had fallen through. I was lucky I brought some of my own, but many didn't. I thought the organization should have provided something as an alternative - maybe bananas or something. Overall, I enjoyed the race and would consider doing it again some year.
By: Zach J.
Posted: April 18, 2009
Great race! What's all the fuss about?
I thought the organization was great, but the re-design of the course this year was icky - especially the last hill going up State St. to South Temple. That bugger has got to go. And Van Winkle wasn't any fun, but that wasn't a surprise. The volunteers were great, and the aid stations well stocked, but there could have been more eats in the finish area. Nice fan support, though not as much as you'd expect in a big-city race. I will definitely be running this race again.
By: Return R.
Posted: January 04, 2009
well organized race with plenty of support
I've run this race two years in a row and I enjoyed both times. This year, 2008, had a bad headwind (obviously organizers don't control the weather), but it turned into a nice tailwind for the second half! Aid stations were well-stocked and staffed. Will run again in 2009.
By: Bill B.
Posted: June 21, 2008
Need a lot of work
I found the course to be very pretty, the spectators to be supportive, but the organization to be lacking. The start area was far too congested, as was the finish chute. The bag pick-up area was a 10:00 walk through very congested streets. I still haven't received my race shirt or medal. No one from Devine has acknowledged my e-mails. I don't feel that I got my money's worth.
By: Stace S.
Posted: May 27, 2008
Still Great!
Perhaps they don't call it the Great Salt Lake anymore, but if they've dropped that term, I believe the SLC Marathon should pick it up. Whenever a race has poor weather on race day, I always see people bash the organization. This shouldn't be the case here! Sure it was windy this year, but if you train and pace properly, this shouldn't be too bad at all! As an organization, Devine has had issues in L.A. (which I won't run anymore) and some problems in Las Vegas (which I didn't see, but was told about); but as a participant in 3 of the last SLC Marathons, I cannot hold any prejudices against the Salt Lake Devine people.
This course was gorgeous, and it actually was able to run through the highlight reel of the Salt Lake City area. The only hiccups I saw were the shirt colors, and the medals. The shirts were great quality; it's just that the colors this year were a step down from previous ones. The medal seems like they spent too much on a graphic artist and not enough on any runners' input. (I don't care if it looked good on paper; I want it to look good around my neck.) As for the previous medals, they've always been great!
Though people are complaining about the finish line food being unhealthy, what they fail to mention is that SLC has a variety. Us runners need to learn to grab what they want and leave that which they deem "unhealthy." There is always fruit and bread and Gatorade. Me? I'm grabbing the hot slice of pizza or a beefy hot dog! I've earned it.
Where this race really shines though is hands down with its spectators. Sure there are a few dead spots on the course. But I'll run New York if I need a bunch of people cheering. The Delta Center is one of the loudest NBA arenas, and the finish line is no different! I've never seen another double-decker marathon finish line, and the energy from this one keeps bringing me back! Thank you, Salt Lake, for bringing me back to your "Great" Salt Lake City Marathon.
By: amber b.
Posted: May 14, 2008
Funnel-Effect Finish Line!
It was very different to hear gospel music at the start line - not my first choice to get pumped up. Glad to have my own music! I liked the wind at my back, and the course; I just didn't like finishing on brick roads. That was not good for the ankles, and the funnel effect: I couldn't sprint to finish. Also, too many runners for the 1/2 marathon. The whole mess with the shirts and the colors... terrible!! At least on the bile-colored shirts you can see the sponsors' logos on the back, and the lack of gender-sizing left me with a huge men's size, or a fat boy's size. I can't run in either size! Lame medal!
By: Allen Thomas
Posted: May 04, 2008
A 'Devine' Race'?
As an outsider, I don't understand all the negative comments. I appreciated the gospel choir (it is SLC after all), I thought it was a good idea to have the major present at the start (city support of the race can' be bad I would think), and the course picked took advantage of the elevation. The only undesirable element I found was the wind, but I don't ee how that's Devine's fault. Utah is a beautiful state and I'm sure the other marathons the state hosts are wonderful&but this one wasn't nearly as bad as others made it out to be. Don't be put off the negative comments...run it and judge it for yourself.
By: shawn m.
Posted: May 01, 2008
Wait a month & do OGDEN
Bad shirt, medal, crowd, pre/post-race music, on-course music, post-race food.... What else is there??
By: Dwight M.
Posted: April 28, 2008
Bad Race
This was my second marathon. My first was the Marine Marathon in DC. In the SLC Marathon, the food and refreshments were all gone by the time I came in at 4:25:09. The medals were small and Devine made sure its name was all over the ribbon. This race is more about the 5K, 1/2 marathon, and bike tour than the marathon. I traveled from Arkansas for a not-so-good race. I would not do it again. I was very disappointed in Devine Racing. Do yourself a favor: Don't run this one.
By: Jim G.
Posted: April 28, 2008
Great but not Devine
Despite the periodic dusty wind surges, the weather was great; and the course changed directions enough that runners got breaks from these pesky gusts.
Good:
1 The spectators. There was a lot of support throughout the whole course. It was awesome that many of the residents of the neighborhoods were out cheering on the runners.
2. The relief stations. There were ample water stops with friendly volunteers. Minor detail, but the paper cups that were handed out are much easier to drink out of while running than Styrofoam or plastic. The Gu and fruit slices handed out during the run were also a major plus. The timing clocks at all of the miles were a great advantage, too.
3. Ease of transportation. Of all the marathons Ive run, this marathon was by far the easiest to get to and fro. The location of hotels, pre/post-race events, registration, start line and finish line were all either within walking distance or assessable via light rail. Not only was it convenient for the actual runners, but it also provided ease for the traveling companions. My entourage was able to travel with me to the start line to see me off - and simply use the light rail to catch me back at the finish line, and that is a superb advantage.
Bad: I wouldn't make as much of an issue about the bad aspects of the run if it weren't for the fact that the announcer made a verbal pledge that you couldn't find a better marathon than the SLC Marathon. Well if this marathon were to get a perfect 10 in my book, the following would have to be rectified:
1. The host hotel. I stayed in one of the two host hotels. I can't speak for both of them obviously, but I was disappointed to learn that the dirty hotel I was staying in did not offer continental breakfast and the overpriced restaurant was closed that early in the morning. Ultimately it was my fault for not inquiring about this beforehand; but in all my past hotel stays during marathons, I've been provided some kind of food at the lodging establishment (and they've had fewer stars). Bottom-line, for this hotel to have "host-status," it wasn't up to par. And because transportation to the start line was via light rail, a runner could stay at any downtown hotel and have ease of travel. I just think the marathon organizers could find a better place or coordinate something with the host hotel to provide more amenities aside from a very small room discount.
2. Pre- and post-race food. There should have been more than just water at the start line! Some of us were there two hours prior to the start time; and because of the lack of food at the host hotel (see above comment) I'm thankful I packed an energy bar! I realize runners aren't going to (and shouldn't) overindulge prior to a race, some fruit slices would have been nice. I also took issue with the finish-line food. I know you can't please everyone's whims; but I'm curious to know how many runners who just ran 26.2 miles in the wee hours of the morning really want to finish it off with a nice juicy pork hot dog. Maybe I'm in the minority; but I'd rather see a variety of fruits, yogurt, bagels, muffins - which there was none of! (There were bananas, but that was the ONLY kind of fruit.)
3. Medals. They appeared somewhat cheap; and I'm hearing from other runners that many are in agreement.
4. Pace groups. Since the marathon website offered information about training, and training runs, etc., I was disappointed to see that there weren't pace groups.
By: Jeanine H.
Posted: April 24, 2008
Gets Worse Every Year!
I've run this race for the last four years and have seen a steady decline in the organization and participation. The medals continue to get smaller each year and now they don't even attempt to call everyone's name when crossing the finish line. My suggestion is to wait a month and run Ogden instead. The smaller Utah races, organized by the cities (Ogden, St. George, Logan and Park City), do a much better job than the Salt Lake Marathon, which is managed by professional organization - Devine Racing. Go figure!
By: Bridger F.
Posted: April 23, 2008
Marathon no longer the focus
I ran this marathon in 2004 and it was great. My expectations for the 2008 marathon were similar, but it now seems that more focus has been placed on all the other events (5K, Half, Bike Tour) to the detriment of the marathon. It is still a quality race with a good route and well stocked aid stations, but not quite like the first time I ran it.
By: Brett M.
Posted: April 22, 2008
What happened this year?
I have run this marathon 3 times, starting in 2004 with the inaugural run. What happened this year? No one ran the marathon like in past years. Maybe it's because they added the half-marathon, but if I recall correctly, the marathon numbers in the past were larger than the 1200 folks that finished the race this year. What's going on? I was baffled when we lost all the other runners at Sugarhouse Park. Hopefully it will be better next year. And I second the previous comments about Rocky Anderson; Mr. Devine, it's a marathon! Not politics! And the gospel music was great but not for a pre-race pump-me-up! It was a good run, and I had a great time. Thanks to all of the people cheering.
By: Carl F.
Posted: April 21, 2008
Gospel music at a marathon? Bad choice.
Worst pre-race music ever! I also noticed that you downsized the medal. Anything to make a buck, eh?
By: Scott W.
Posted: April 21, 2008
You get your t-shirt and medal a month later???
I ran the SLC marathon in 2006 and the half in 2008. The course was great, and the weather was much better this year than in 2006. April is a MUCH better month than June for this race.
My one complaint is that I was told at the finish that I had registered late, and because of that my medal and shirt would be mailed to me a month later. That sucks! Who wants a medal a month after the race???
I registered on the first to last day, so I don't see how that's "late." If there are certain number of slots available, shouldn't they order that many medals?
By: Kamille G.
Posted: April 21, 2008
Where's the beer garden???
What happened to the post-race beer garden? I know Utahans are somewhat conservative about alcohol consumption, but I've never run a race before without a beer garden or the option to purchase a beer at the end of a tough run. The lack of the beer garden just confirmed the stereotypes I'd heard about this state.
The fans were few and far between. I've never felt so lonely on a run before. This was billed as a big marathon; however they failed to point out that most of the participants did the shorter races. Could have used some music/bands along the way. There was only one group of drummers that I can recall.
Views were breathtaking (at least for the first half of the run). Towards the end it was very plain and boring as you ran along Van Winkle Parkway into the city.
Expected a better turnout at Liberty Park for the final push towards the Gateway Station.
Color for full marathon t-shirts was hideous; however the graphic were great. I will never wear this because of the color. Some have described the color as: puss, callous, bile, or smog - just to name a few. The color doesn't look good on anyone. So there go my bragging rights for finishing the race because I'll never, ever wear the tee.
Altitude kicked my butt. Trained at sea level and struggled after 14 miles.
Final advice: Pack you own beer, bring your iPod and convince your friends and family to make the trip with you, because the locals won't show up for moral support.
By: Kevin K.
Posted: April 20, 2008
Really Nice Race
Traffic control was the best I've ever seen. I thank traffic detail whenever I run past them but there were so many at this race that I couldn't thank them all. Watering stations were FULL of volunteers and the Gatorade was some of the best I've ever tasted during a race (sometimes you get a watered-down mix or something over-mixed, but this was perfect). Weather, an uncontrollable variable, was pleasant, save for the 20+ mph headwind the first half of the race which made it a little more challenging, but that headwind became a tailwind over the last half, so it evened out. Very scenic course with mountain views pretty much the entire way. Spectators, while not huge in numbers, were very supportive, vocal and kind. The last bit to the finish line is really inspiring. Loved the race and highly recommend it.
By: Jessica P.
Posted: April 20, 2008
Love the Spectators
I ran this race yesterday, April 19th, 2008, and I loved this race. There were a few more hills than expected but nothing too bad. After the half marathon point on the marathon course, it's all downhill and flat. Spectators there are really great people. They could still use more of them but I think that will change as the years go on, as this is still a fairly new race. Food at the finish line was a bummer. Only had bananas, hot dogs, cheese taquitos, and almonds/granola. That was a shame. Massages were wonderful and we didn't have to wait too long. Overall, I will definitely do this race again - it was a lot of fun!
By: Guy A.
Posted: April 20, 2008
Tough course, bad start/finish
This was my most difficult marathon to run; I don't know if it was the wind, the altitude, or the heat, but it was difficult. There was no corral start so I spent 3 miles darting around walkers and slower runners (bad). The finish had promised all sorts of food, but the 1/2 marathoners ate nearly all of it (I finished in the top half of the marathon, and paid the marathon price, but these Devine marathons are hit or miss). The course was very well managed at the water stops and easy to navigate.
By: James W.
Posted: November 24, 2007
Terrific Place and "Positive People" Marathon!
This run was filled with great conditions all the way around: thank you to ALL the volunteers; bands were super-cool; the people along the way went out of their way to cheer us on; and the traffic control was superb. Beautiful start location and terrific finish pathway!!! My first marathon here has inspired 5 more this year: thanks for the great FINISH - the food, the health-care, etc. were the best of all other runs. This one is a must-do run.
By: Trey M.
Posted: May 13, 2007
Great event, but lose the Rocky Anderson promotion
This was my first marathon, and it was a great experience! I ran the half marathon the year before and had a great time in that race also. This year's organization was great and the fans kept me going. The bands that played at the cheer stations did a great job and the styles of music had a wide variety - great job. My only complaint was Devine promoting Rocky Anderson at the start line as "the greatest mayor in the country." I came for the race not a political endorsement! Re-think that next time, Devine. I will run this race next year.
By: Bart W.
Posted: April 26, 2007
Elevation: kicked my butt!
Course: tough for someone who trained at sea level. The dry climate was a factor as well coming from a humid climate.
Organization: start line was accessible and easy to get to by TRAX. However, the energy at the starting line was somewhat subdued. It could have been the poor choice in music, not sure. Finish line was smooth and plentiful! Kudos for the warm bread sticks!
Spectators: a scant amount. The ones that did come out were very supportive. The so-called "spirit stations" were a disappointment. Perhaps the biggest disappointment was Liberty Park; it was barren and lonely. I expected a greater turn-out running in a major city like Salt Lake.
By: Rick Flatlander
Posted: April 24, 2007
Well organized for a small race
The expo, packet pick up, Trax, porta-john lines, and start line all went smoothly. Got a hard sell at the expo to buy snake oil to take 15 minutes off my time. That was entertaining. I stayed at the host Marriott. Ok, but cheaper hotels have more amenities. Trax had a stop right at the hotel, which was very nice. But there were several hotels closer to the finish that would have worked better for me - no mention of them in the website. I've run all my previous marathons in Texas so I learned a hard lesson about altitude. Didn't fare well but my fault for not researching/preparing. Fans were few out in the remote areas but not what I came for. The water bags on the course were nice but too big - lots of waste. I also prefer the Gatorade cut 50%. Full strength is a bit much for most of us. Very good race overall for its size.
By: Bruce and Joan Nelson
Posted: April 24, 2007
A perfect spring race!
I was a bit leary about this race from all the comments I had read previous and friends warned me it was terrible - boy were THEY wrong! The expo was fantastic - not too huge, but I found lots of great stuff and info and the packet pick up was a breeze! The parking was awesome and it couldn't have been easier or more organized to get to the start. The course was really nice and if it wasn't for a pulled leg muscle towards mile 23 I would have qualified for Boston. As it was, it still was a pretty good time. The food was the BEST I have EVER seen. Everyone has already described it - the pizza was exactly what the Doctor ordered and the massage was unbelieveably long and great - they even covered you with blankets so you wouldn't freeze. The people were very helpful and the spectators were great. High-fiving the kids along the way was the coolest part - I hope it inspires them to do it too! There were plenty of aid stations and while the water bottles were a bit too large, it sure was easy to run and drink rather than the cups!My husband seconds all of these comments as he ran it also. Good job, Salt Lake. We would do it again!
By: Jack L.
Posted: April 24, 2007
Great SLC experience!
Overall, the SLC Marathon was a great experience. The course is tough but fast. Additionally, SLC is probably the cleanest and safest of the big cities in the United States.
Positives:
1. Expo was easy to find and navigate through to obtain race packet and t-shirt.
2. Love the t-shirt! I will definitely wear this shirt.
3. TRAX allowed for un-eventful arrival to the race start. We drove into the city and parked within 200 meters of the TRAX station. Parking was sufficient and was near the finish line, requiring a short walk after the race. Well planned!
4. Marathon route was fast and mostly downhill, which was tough on the quads! My legs started cramping at mile 10 but that was only because I skied 5 consecutive days prior to the race. My legs were fatigued before I started the race but I did set a PR for myself.
5. Weather in 2007 was perfect with temps in the 50s and partly cloudy skies.
6. Water breaks were sufficiently supplied with water, Gatorade, and Clif Shots.
7. Volunteers were extremely helpful and friendly!
8. Food line at the end was UNBELIEVABLE! Best I've seen to date for a marathon.
9. The concert in the city after the race was fantastic!
Negatives:
1. Water bottles were a little big for the race. I hope there was a recycling plan because there were many partially full bottles discarded by the runners.
2. Porta-toilets at the race start had long lines causing excessive waits for runners. I recommend evaluating the need for more toilets at the race start and first two aid station stops in the race. May need to re-configure the layout at the race start.
Partial Negative:
1. Spectators were present but compared to other marathons, the majority lacked enthusiasm. I expect this will change as this marathon becomes a much bigger event in SLC.
Well done, SLC! I highly recommend this marathon!
By: Rhett M.
Posted: April 23, 2007
The best Devine effort so far
I was a part of the disastrous New Las Vegas Marathon in 2006, and swore off Devine Racing forever. But... I decided to give them one last try, and man, am I glad I did. Of the 5 Devine races I've run, this was worlds above the others. I can't believe this was the same company. Good expo, good (and useful) shirt, easy to get to the start line, and the food at the end was the best I have ever seen. Good job Devine; you renewed my faith in you. Incredible race.
By: Harry S.
Posted: April 23, 2007
Top-Notch Event
The middle part of the course is not so good, but the beginning and the end are top-notch. It was very well organized from the expo to the finish line. You get a nice medal and a nice shirt. The post-race refreshments were the best I've ever experienced, a HUGE improvement over last year. Put this race on your calendar just for the fun of it, or at least do the 1/2M. The new date in April and earlier start time is much better than last year. This marathon should get the "most improved" award for 2007. The one thing I noticed that I liked better last year was the post-race "party." There was no "party" at the post-race party in 2007. The music was fine, but no beer, tiny crowd... not much of a party. Maybe everybody got too partied out at the finish line. That was great this year.
By: Daron C.
Posted: April 23, 2007
Solid Race
This race does everything well. The organization is very solid, the basics covered well. The course is pretty good - mostly declines that don't beat up the legs. Spectator support, while not spectacular, is good. This year's weather was really about as good as a marathoner could hope for - in the 40s most of the time. I ran this race last year when it was in June (way too hot!) and vowed not to do it again unless they moved it back to April. They moved it, and I ran. My time was faster than expected, because of the good, cool weather.
Participation seemed way down for the marathon this year, with many more runners in the half. Too bad, because this really is a good race.
Thanks for moving the race back to April. I'll keep running it as long as it is during the cooler spring months.
By: Don Pattison
Posted: April 22, 2007
What a chow line at the end!
I didn't have a great race time-wise, but I had a heck of a good time in the city. The expo was pretty good; it was easy to get your goodie bag and shirt. The shirt is one that might actually get worn and not get cut up into a quilt. The course was not too bad; most of the hills are down, and about the only nasty incline is right at mile 7 (mile 7 is the top of the hill). They split the full and the 1/2 apart and the full went through a park and then joined back up with the half, so there was some congestion there, but within a 1/4 or 1/2 mile the full racers went one way and the 1/2 went another. The best thing was the chow line at the end. It seemed to be endless pizza, chicken wings, smoothies, power drinks, breadsticks, yogurt pops, more bananas and water. I couldn't carry everything I wanted so I went back afterwards two times. Each time the pizza and wings were hot, as were the breadsticks. I've been to bigger races but never been to one with this much food.
By: Rick ( The RRRick ) Karampatsos
Posted: April 22, 2007
Thanks for the many blessings!
This was my 41st different state marathon and I will rate it (although it ended up being my slowest time in over two years - not your fault!). I would consider this in the top 3 best to run. Getting to and from was very easy to do.... The shuttle train was neat! The only negative comment was the High Mountain Well water bottle - way too big for a race! It was a shame to see so many of them thrown off to the side, seemingly half full. Your expo was a lot of fun. The booth with the folks from Snickers/Marathon Energy Bars were very helpful with info. The packet pickup system was perfect! AND - the end of the race section - WOW! I have not eaten that well in many, many races! This was a great marathon experience even in all my pain!
By: Len F.
Posted: April 22, 2007
2007: Overall, A Great Experience
Of the marathons I have run in recent years, SLC was the best organizationally, at least this year. Vegas 2006 was ok, but SLC handled the post-running nutrition the very best of anywhere I have been. The course was laid out well, and hey, for 7,000 - 10,000 runners, the bathroom situation was not bad, at all. Suggestion: I know it's "illegal" to do anything on Sunday in Utah, but Sunday would alleviate the traffic congestion/delays. The early hours of TRAX arrival at the U of U was good for breaking up the sheer volume, but as usual for Utahns, everyone ended up there at the last minute. Having the race on Sunday and a bit later in the day may help relieve the early hours and traffic problems. Most times, Utah spectators are very melancholy and unenthusiastic, but the spectators were pretty impressive! Overall, very well done, SLC organizers and spectators! Thank you for a great experience and helping the runners to survive well pre-, during and post-race! I hope the next SLC Mayorship continues to support great organizational insight.
By: Candace A.
Posted: January 29, 2007
Great Race, With a Few Minor Issues
This was my first marathon, and I had a great experience at it.
The expo was nice, the course was beautiful (hey, home town, gotta say it!), and the spectators were awesome.
Only complaints I have were of the clock (yes, why was it set for the elite runners???), the heat (75-90 degrees, I'm glad they've moved it back to April this year), and the lack of shade and chairs at the finish. Black asphalt was not nice to have to deal with at the end of a long race.
I didn't have any issues with food at the end. I was able to get chips and oranges and drinks at the Wild Oats booth just fine.
By: Frank H.
Posted: August 10, 2006
Great race until the disaster at the finish
The Salt Lake Marathon is an alternate marathon to the Utah Grand Slam, voted overwhelmingly by the Grand Slam group to be the alternate. The admission price I think is a lot of the problem - at $80 - when all the other ones are only $50 or so. But I added this one to the Grand Slam this year, for the first time. The course was good, and support from aid stations and spectators was done well. My first ride on Trax to the start went fine. Overall it was a positive, fun experience until I got to the finish line.
Like everyone else, I give a marathon everything I've got, and almost always find myself overheated, tired, and sick at the end. At Ogden this year there were medics waiting for me at the finish line, who whisked me into the aid tent for help. At Deseret News this year there were also medics who half carried me into the aid tent for help. At Salt Lake my time went very well, and I improved my time from what I expected by 10 minutes with an extreme effort in the last few miles. I ran across the finish line at full speed, and got a great picture, which I actually bought. But unlike Ogden or Deseret News, there was no one there to help.
I leaned against the fence as I stood on hot asphalt for several minutes until I was able to walk away. Then I had to walk for what seemed like FOREVER. When I got to the destination after the walk, there was nothing but dirty black asphalt again. By now after that long walk I was really sick, and everything was getting brighter and brighter as something was happening with my vision. Instead of lying down on grass or in an aid tent, I was still just on that asphalt. Lucky for me, I was able to find a small plastic folding chair to sit in until my vision returned to normal, otherwise I would have just had to lie on the asphalt. After that I had to walk all the way back out again to get back to my car. I realize there doesn't happen to be a park in the Gateway, but there needs to be something at the end for runners who are struggling. I'll probably be back next year, but I hope things can be better at the end.
By: Karen Young
Posted: August 06, 2006
My 2 cents
Granted, I was four months pregnant so I only did the half marathon this year, but I had to get online and share my experience.
We got there early and were able to park just 1/2 mile away from the start line which was nice. We stood in line for the bathrooms for over half an hour - not nice. For the first two miles of the race, people were running into the bushes. The view was gorgeous but dang it was hot that day; I would vote for an earlier start next year. The expo the night before was awesome and we got performance tees - very nice! I'm still grumbling about the lack of water for the five miles in the middle (thanks go to the neighbors for handing out bottles and orange slices) - and when I crossed the finish line I didn't get a medal!!!!!!!! They "ran out." Took them four weeks instead of the promised two weeks to get it mailed out. Next year I'll try the Bike Tour instead.
By: Mike C.
Posted: July 27, 2006
No value for the cost, poorly organized
This was my second SLC Marathon. The first SLC Marathon had its problems (insufficient toilets, difficulty getting to the start, inadequate food and drink at the finish, etc.). I said then I would never run SLC again. Two years later, a friend talked me into running in 2006 and I found out nothing has changed. The toilets were still 35-40 deep with less than 25-30 minutes to start. Trax (the trolley to the start) should have trains running more often, and not packed in with bikes. There seemed to be a total lack of organization at the start as even the elite runners had a false start. There are too many different classes of events all starting and/or hitting the finish line simultaneously.
The finish area is an absolute disaster!!! Water and a mini banana (brown at that) just doesn't cut it after 26.2 miles. If this is one of the top 12 new marathons, I would really hate to imagine what others are like. A month earlier I ran Ogden, Utah (little Ogden) and it out-classes SLC by a long shot.
This event will never live up to being an elite marathon under the current leadership and how it is organized. I still have no clue why a marathon of this caliber charges $80. For what? Fair price is more like $35-40 max, if that. This is one marathon to avoid until the price comes down or the quality, organization, and amenites greatly improve.
By: Jessica D.
Posted: June 13, 2006
Good race with room for improvement
This was a decent marathon. The course was fun except for the long stretch of highway out in the sun. I liked the expo and the participant shirt was nice. The train system was great. I got to the race early and had time to get myself ready and pumped. Luckily, I didn't need to use the bathroom. Tons of people were outside to cheer us on. The police did an excellent job with the traffic and were cheering for us too. There was better music at this race than the Rock and Roll marathons. The drumlines were perfect!
There are some things that were a problem though. There were no announcements made or signs up directing runners to where the start of the race from the train station. The medal was nice but would it have been too much to ask for a date to be put on it? It looks like devine wants to use the leftover medals next year so they don't have to get a brand new batch. The finish area needs to be closed off without non-runners walking through. I finished the marathon and was trying to find where to drop my chip and I had a ton of people walking in front of me, including women pushing a bunch of strollers. They had no concept of what the runners had just done and didn't appear to care. The whole finish area needs to be closer to the actual finish. The finish through the crowd was nice but then I wanted to sit and rest and all there was to sit on was dirty black asphalt. I would have preferred a grassy area or a park where people can take their time stretching before they go home. The food at the finish in no way was sufficient. Where was the Gatorade? The juices were nice but not what I needed. After the heat, I needed more then a shot of pomegrante juice. If you are going to have oranges, at least have them cut open. I couldn't get them open and it took my fiancee about 10 minutes to open them for me.
Overall it was a nice race but not one I would feel the need to do again.
By: George Armstong Custer (Ret.)
Posted: June 09, 2006
What is up with the clocks?
Was this race put on solely for the elite runners? The clocks were started when they left and remained that way the entire race! So now everbody has a photo of them crossing the finish line with the wrong time!!!!! Thanks a lot.
By: Daniel Talbot
Posted: June 08, 2006
This race was awesome, I will run it every year!
The spectators were awesome! Overall the scenery was beautiful. I loved the medal given out to the finishers much more than I anticipated. I had so much fun with the race, spectators, and the nice finish area that I vowed to run this race every year 'til the legs give out.
I do think that the Van Winkle stretch is a bit dull... maybe a course change there?
Kudos to the volunteers and sponsors! Great race!
By: Chris A.
Posted: June 07, 2006
First Marathon
Everything from the start to finish was a great experience. All the aid station where great. The sponges were great at the half way point. Running through the Gateway felt great. I don't know where I got the energy I did when running at the end. The massage was great, after that I went home to ice my legs. All in all I would recommend anyone to run Salt Lake. I thought the hill would be hard, but I was surprised how easy they were. The first 20 miles were easy. The last 6 I had to work hard to maintain my pace, but I went about a minute and ½ under my goal. I was pretty happy, and proud to finish how I finished the race.
By: Joe Denning
Posted: June 07, 2006
A great course, great fans and well organized
This was my first marathon. I am glad they moved the run from April to June. The training months are just to cold. It was hot on race day but just happened to be 12 degrees above normal. The race was extemely well run. Plenty of water breaks and bathrooms. The fans were great. From the 18th to 22nd miles people used home hoses to mist down runners. That was awesome. My only suggestion is to start the race earlier in the day but keep it in June! The course was great. Often the course was covered by shade trees. The worst part was downtown, no shade. I would run this marathon again. I hope the other marathons I run in are as well planned and executed as this one. The medal given out to finishers was really cool.
By: Jeff Crane
Posted: June 06, 2006
Worst organized marathon I have run.
In my experience, adequacy of starting line porta-potties is a good test for how well a marathon is organized. In Salt Lake, it was just the beginning. From not enough porta-potties at the starting line to misplaced or missing mile markers to inadequate aid stations, this race was poorly run. (The mile markers that did exist had clocks displaying incorrect elapsed times.)
Devine Productions is obviously in this to maximize profit, regardless of what it means for the runners. The presence of a bike tour(?!) meant that the marathon could not start until 6:45 - way too late for a June day with projected high temp of 90 degrees. Poor treatment of runners actually started well before race-day. I sent two emails with questions in the weeks leading up to the race - both went unanswered. I will definitely avoid Devine Productions and recommend others to do the same.
I do want to say, however, that the volunteers were terrific.
By: Katherine K.
Posted: June 06, 2006
Beautiful, well organized, but too hot
Pros:
The marathon had a 40-minute early start for walkers and slower joggers, which was nice.
The host hotel (Hilton) was well located, had ample buses to the start, allowed a 2 p.m. late check-out and was reasonably priced.
The expo was well organized and only a block away from the hotel.
The fans on the race course were friendly and tried to help with the heat. Many turned on their garden hoses for runners to go through. A nice man gave me some ice from his cooler around mile 13 and some ladies around mile 18 were giving out watermelon slices.
The aid stations were well stocked even for the back-of-the-pack runners. The wet sponges were a nice touch in the hot weather.
Cons:
90 degrees is just too hot to run a marathon in (just ask the man I saw convulsing around mile 15).
The section of the race that the locals referred to as the Vanwinkle was boring; it had few spectators and no shade.
When I finished the only food I could find was a bag of snacks from Whole Foods. After completing 26.2 miles I would have preferred pizza, bratwurst or a sandwich - not just crackers, granola and juice.
By: Tory K.
Posted: June 06, 2006
Wonderful Race!
SLC was my fourth marathon and one I was really looking forward to. I'd never been to Utah, but I knew it was a gorgeous state.
The race was extremely well organized with a breathtakingly beautiful course. Course organization and support was outstanding.
The spectators, however, really made the marathon for me. They were out in droves! Every runner felt like a celebrity with all of the cheering, the kind people hosing us down as we ran by, and the encouragement.
Water stations were well manned and plentiful. This was very important considering the heat of the day.
The finish line area was a little overcrowded with my MAJOR pet peeve, parents feeding their kids off the food offerings. I saw a family walk up to a table with milk and take the last of it with probably a few hundred runners left to come in. Nice! KEEP FAMILIES OUT OF THE FOOD AREA!
Other than that, I would highly recommend this marathon to anyone. If I were planning on repeating a marathon, this would definitely be on the list.
By: ben knorr
Posted: June 05, 2006
Not the same as the previous two years
The expo was still excellent. The coordination of TRAX was better this year too.
During the race however, it seemed like the drink tables were understaffed and smaller than before. On one occasion, I tasted gatorade that had a strong odor of mildew. The gel station was there somewhere, but all I saw were spent gels all along the ground- nobody handing out or advertising gels when I went through miles 13-18. At least I could get water though- a friend of mine didn't see water tables from the table near mile 4, then near mile 8 on the half course. She had a terrible time for the rest of the race.
Other than that, the fans were still great, and again, there was mostly adequate fluids available. Giant sponges were also given out just before the long hot 500E stretch, which helped a TON!
The finish area was partially under construction, so things were confusing. All sorts of non-racers were slipping into the finish line area where the foods were being handed out though...I got a bag with some chips, fruit roll up samples and other little candy type things, a couple oranges, chocolate milk, water, and some pomegranite juice sample. No bagles, bread, bananas =(
This was still a fun race, but it has definitely slipped in overall quality from its first two.
By: ben knorr
Posted: June 05, 2006
Not the same as the previous two years
The expo was still excellent. The coordination of TRAX was better this year too.
During the race however, it seemed like the drink tables were understaffed and smaller than before. On one occasion, I tasted Gatorade that had a strong odor of mildew. The gel station was there somewhere, but all I saw were spent gels all along the ground - nobody handing out or advertising gels when I went through miles 13-18. At least I could get water though - a friend of mine didn't see water tables from the table near mile 4, then near mile 8 on the half course. She had a terrible time for the rest of the race.
Other than that, the fans were still great, and again, there was mostly adequate fluids available. Giant sponges were also given out just before the long hot 500E stretch, which helped a TON!
The finish area was partially under construction, so things were confusing. All sorts of non-racers were slipping into the finish line area where the foods were being handed out though.... I got a bag with some chips, fruit roll-up samples and other little candy-type things, a couple oranges, chocolate milk, water, and some pomegranate juice sample. No bagels, bread, bananas. =(
This was still a fun race, but it has definitely slipped in overall quality from its first two.
By: Evan S.
Posted: June 05, 2006
1st half great; last 1/2 hot and not so great
The 1st 1/2 of this race was great, coming through the campus, down Foothill into Sugarhouse & Holladay. When you turned north about mile 14, around Van Winkle, the scenery just was just like running on a divided highway, then into kind-of a sketchy neighborhood through So. Salt Lake, all the way to about 2100 So. As you hit 2100 So. you re-entered the Sugarhouse neighborhood the tree cover returned and the fear of drive-by shooting went away. It was really starting to get hot after the race left Liberty Park. It was kind of scenic running down State St., but really hot. I would have preferred to run under or up to the Eagle Gate and take South or North Temple St. to the Gateway finish so we could have ran past the Temple. The race is in Salt Lake City; it should go by the Temple shouldn't it?
The organization of this race was great - extremely well organized. You got a great finisher's medallion; I think it's the nicest one I have ever received. The expo and finish line refreshments were pretty good. They also had a free concert at the awards ceremony. I enjoyed that. I prefer both the Ogden and St. George courses over this one. I may do the 1/2 marathon next year, but not the whole, unless my brother or somebody challenges me.
By: Tricia B.
Posted: June 05, 2006
One Big Circus
This is a great course and very beautiful. But I have to say they have turned it into a big circus: the marathon, 1/2 marathon, bike race, 5K, and 1K. So is it really the SL Marathon???? With the date changes to JUNE IN UTAH (one word: "HOT"), eliminating some of these events would have given the MARATHONERS an opportunity to start at 6:00 instead of 6:45ish. Upon the finish and weaving through an extra mile of construction to get my chip removed... I was given my goodie bag with some potato/pita chip and orange and a small 2-3 oz. cup of a smoothie. HUMMMM - just ran 26.2 miles, a bagel or piece of bread, or something a little meatier than potato chips would have been nice. Overall since the first marathon was held, numbers have dropped across the board and just not many spectators out, and not the same big rally at the finish. I don't know if I will consider this race again even being a local, unless the date changes.
By: Daron C.
Posted: June 05, 2006
Very Pretty But Too Warm
This race has a very nice course, but it does have deceptive inclines that are very gradual and can wear you down early. The mountains are very scenic.
The organization is as good as any other race I've run in the past 15 years. They really treat the runners well and the aid stations are top-notch.
The spectator support is solid, but not the best I've experienced. Entertainment on the course (bands, performers, etc.) was well done.
Overall, a very good race. However, I doubt I will run this again. With this year's event moved to June from April, it was just way too hot. The last two hours of my run ranged from uncomfortable to dangerous. All the runners around me complained about the heat also. I had to summon help at one aid station to run 100 yards back down the course to help a runner lying on the sidewalk.
If I run this race again, I'll probably just do the half marathon to avoid potential high temperatures.
If they continue with this as a June race, the start time needs to be at 5:30 or 6 a.m.
By: Dave L.
Posted: June 05, 2006
High Altitude + High Temps = Slow Mo
Let me start by congratulating Salt Lake on a well-organized and well-run marathon. They had a great technical shirt, great medal, great water stops and goodly amount of port-o-potties. The orange slices helped, and many fans offered a cold garden hose spray-down, which was heavenly. But THE HEAT was in the 80's and brutal, with an occasional wind. The high altitude didn't help either, but at least the humidity was low. Miles 13 to 18 along Van Winkle were especially hard, with the long asphalt road shimmering in the heat, and no shade no-where. I drank enough liquids that my stomach sloshed around, yet I still felt dehydrated and tired. I pushed myself onward to the finish line by dreaming of snarfing down watermelon at the end; but when I got to the Gateway, they didn't have no stinking cold watermelon - they had cold milk! Only in Utah....
By: Steve Stillman
Posted: June 05, 2006
June Ok, but April Probably Better
A week before the June 2006 SLC Marathon the weather forecast was for the 90s on race-day. At first I thought it was going to be a repeat of the 2004 Los Angeles Marathon, which was also in the 90s and just a miserable experience. However in this case the race organizers were better prepared. Even though they had a bike tour before the marathon, they got the early start marathoners started just 5 minutes after the bikers (6:05 a.m. Mountain Time) unlike LA, which waited until the bikers were done and so didn't start until 8ish. The regular marathoners started around 6:45 a.m. so most of the race was run before the heat. LA should do the same (and since the race organizers are the same as this event I would hope that someday they change).
A few other notes. Ignore the recommendation to take the 4:30 a.m. UTA Trax train to the start. I got on at this time and there was just about nobody else on the train. I should have waited until 5:15 a.m.
There are 4 or 5 porta-potties every 2 miles unlike other marathons, which seem to only have 1 or 2 at each stop. So it's possible to use the facilities without having to wait.
There weren't many spectators but the ones who were out there usually had a garden hose ready to hose you down. Towards the end of the race when it started to get hot this was really appreciated. Also there were a couple of stops with volunteers ready to cool you down with ice cold sponges.
Finally, this race is at close to 5,000 feet and it does seem to make a big difference if you train at sea level.
By: Sabrina H.
Posted: June 04, 2006
Very Impressed!
Expectations exceeded. Very nice shirt, awesome police/road closure support. Run thorough lots of neighborhoods where the locals took to the lawn chairs and cheered us on- very fun. Course with the snow capped mountians was beautiful. Some will complain about the heat but it didn't bother me (no I was not a fast finisher). I'm now local but moved from the East coast. If you are from a warmer climate or are used to training in the humid summer somewhere, than temps ranging from 60's at start to 80 at finish really won't be too bad, b/c no humidity. Marathon staff well prepared with 16 water stops- everyone very well staffed. Also had sponges at one stop, 2 with Cliff shots, 5 with Vaseline, 1 with oranges. Just as orgainzed as Marine Corps and Chicago.
By: Jason P.
Posted: June 04, 2006
Lots of positives with a few big negatives.
Overall, I really enjoyed this marathon and as a local runner, I would certainly consider doing it again. However, there were a few significant negatives that might outweigh the positives for some. The pros and cons:
On the positive side, the course is really nice. Beautiful scenery with just enough moderate ups and downs to keep things interesting. Spectator support was above average along most of the course and really phenomenal at the finish. The finisher's medal and T-shirt were both fantastic and much nicer than anything I've received in the other 8 marathons I've run.
In my opinion, there were really only two negatives. First, early June is clearly not the best time to schedule the race. It was in the mid 80s within a few hours of the start this year and we were fortunate that we didn't get temperatures in the low 90s as forecast. Why the organizers moved this race from April to June is beyond me. The second problem I encountered was that several of the mile markers were way out of place (at one point in the race, I had consecutive mile splits of 5:00 and 11:00 and I know the problem was not with my watch). Also the 25th mile marker (maybe the most important one in the whole race) was missing entirely.
The bottom line - this is a great race if you're not worried about your time and can handle the high temperatures that you'll encounter in Salt Lake City in early June. But there are many better options for runners looking for a quick time.
By: Paul R.
Posted: June 04, 2006
Half-marathoners got the shaft
I ran the half-marathon for this. Very nice course, well thought out and runs past great scenary and some fun parts of town.
However, there were some problems with the half-marathon. Aid stations were supposed to come every two miles, but one promised station that was on the course map (at mile 6) was missing, meaning that half-marathoners had to go four miles in the heat without fluids. Also, they ran out of finishers medals for the half-marathoners, which was another grievous error.
Other comments: the aid station at Liberty Park only had gatorade, no water! The marathon finishers on cobblestones...ouch! And moving from the cool April weather to the hot June weather was a mistake.
Overall, I had a positive experience, but there's room for improvement.
By: Kathi S.
Posted: June 04, 2006
Fast course, great scenery, hot
This was my first Salt Lake City Marathon. Coming from San Francisco (sea level and cool weather), the altitude and the heat were a bit intimidating. I didn't feel the altitude but the heat was quite bad, especially in the second half when we ran mostly on city streets with no shade. Still, it is such a fast course I set a PR! The course is all downhill or flat, no uphills at all. The crowds are great for a small race that started early. The people here are really friendly and helpful. And the scenery! The snow covered mountains are quite spectacular. Overall, a wonderful race - which would be even better if it was a little earlier in the year, maybe April or May, to avoid the heat.
By: Melanie C.
Posted: June 03, 2006
Needed another aid station, more specators!
There was a definite need for an aid station between miles 4 and 8. There was nothing between miles 3.5 and past eight, and it was already 80 degrees in the middle of the pack by the time we had gotten to that point. Also, we needed more spectators in the middle when going through the residential areas. These comments refer to the HALF marathon.
By: kirt goetzke
Posted: April 30, 2006
could be better
It was great running past a 1,000 early starters from one side of the highway to the other, and they don't even cheer you on. Unfortunately, you don't get to look at the scenery because you had to watch where you were going.
Pre-race pasta meal stamps your hand like it would be a multiple pass for $12.00, but it's not. You had to pay $12.00 for each plate of pasta.
This is a great time of year (at the end of April), and a fantastic drive from Minnesota.
By: Michael Bower
Posted: April 17, 2006
Sorry it's moving to June
I have already commented here about how much I enjoyed the SLCM both times I've run it. One of the best parts of it was that it was in cool, crisp April. It'll be too warm in June, so I'll be passing on it this time around. Too bad.
By: Heather D.
Posted: December 05, 2005
Beautiful marathon!!! Keep it in April!!!
I loved the Salt Lake Marathon. The beautiful spring weather made it completely enjoyable. Next year I'm picking another race, though, because the Salt Lake course would be a bear in June. Sorry Devine... hope you get your numbers in 2006, 'cuz I'm going elsewhere.
By: Doug C.
Posted: July 25, 2005
Great Organization
The best race organization I have seen, especially the little things like warming blankets at the START. As a Salt Lake City runner, I think the course could be done better. But, all in all, a very good marathon.
By: Doug C.
Posted: July 25, 2005
Great Organization
The best race organization I have seen, especially the little things like warming blankets at the START. As a Salt Lake City runner, I think the course could be done better. But, all in all, a very good marathon.
By: Kim Robinson
Posted: July 17, 2005
This Will Become One of the Well-Known Marathons
Hard to add much to what's been said.
SLM is a high-elevation marathon for us flat-landers - but the temperatures are ideal in late April. A bit cooler at the start point (almost 1000 feet above the finish) but the marathon never got above 65 degrees.
Snow-covered peaks dotted the horizon in several directions and the route gently kept dropping (usually) as the race went on. Organization was superb. I took advantage of every water stop and still, due to the low humidity, found I was dehydrated at the end.
Expo rivaled the best I’ve seen. Special trolleys were scheduled (and a bit jammed at 6 AM) to carry the runners (without cost) up to the university start point.
But I will probably distinguish this marathon in my memory from many others due to the extraordinary crowd support throughout most of the race. Salt Lake is very proud of their city and are clearly behind this event - and that will make it special in years to come.
It is hard to imagine the Herculean effort that resulted in such a well-run, 2nd annual event. Congratulations Salt Lake! You know how to put on a marathon!!
By: Da C.
Posted: June 08, 2005
Course is tougher than you might think
I've run 20 marathons and this is by far the best organized. Spectator support was also very solid.
However, the course was very difficult, and I'm not sure why, because it doesn't look that way on paper or when you run it. I spoke with many veteran marathoners who ran Salt Lake this year and they all reported feeling beat by the halfway point. Most had personal worst times. I think the course has just enough climbs and descents to make this a tough run. By the half-marathon point I was into the survival mode, as were others.
Overall, a well run race, pretty scenery, and good crowd support. Just don't expect a PR on this course.
By: Ewell B. H.
Posted: May 17, 2005
Pleasant surprise
As a former resident of SLC, I really enjoyed running through neighborhoods where I used to live and train. I thought the organization was great as well as the spectators. The only disappointment was the food offered in the recovery area. Dried fruit, carrots, exotic juices? Just not in the mood for any of that. Thank goodness a nearby display booth was giving out Dr. Pepper.
By: Franz K.
Posted: May 13, 2005
Great City to Run In
After finishing the Chicago Marathon last year I was looking for an event with fewer runners. For the size of the field, the Salt Lake City team put on a really great marathon. The individual leading the 4-hour pace group was super, providing both encouragement and coaching on the hills. The weather was perfect and the fans very friendly. If I ever run this course again I will do more downhill training because the long descent in the early miles really took a toll on my legs.
By: Liz Raybould
Posted: May 10, 2005
First Marathon and it was GREAT!
Since this was my first marathon and only thus far, I have no comparisons. However, this race was so much fun! I think I'll have a hard time running any other race where there is so much less spectator support. This was the ultimate for me, to see everyone on the streets cheering us on. The organization of the race was great...lots of helping hands at aid stations, local services pitched in when needed with traffic, injuries, etc. The best was the finish line! So many people watching and cheering made it feel like the awesome accomplishment it is. The course seemed very flat and downhill. All great!
By: John J.
Posted: May 07, 2005
Awesome running celebration
Of the 11 marathons I've run, Salt Lake is right up there with St. George, Utah. I slightly prefer St. George due to the spectacular redrock and pine forest scenery. I improved on my 2004 time by 30 minutes due to the very supportive 4-hour pace group with pacer Darris (you're awesome!). Weather was ideal, cool and dry, partly cloudy. The crowd support and traffic control is impressive throughout the 26.2 miles. The start area is well organized and relaxing, with free tramline from downtown. Joan Benoit was the 2005 starter - wow, what an inspiration. The course starts at the University of Utah campus and winds through suburban, tree-lined residential areas for the first 23 miles. Views of the snowcapped Wasatch Mountains for the first 13 miles are inspiring. The final three miles from Liberty Park go through downtown. The finish line is exhilarating into the Gateway Mall area. Thousands of cheering spectators 2-4 rows deep behind barricades provided a memorable 3:59.50 finish that still brings tingles. Thanks for your support, Salt Lake City, and congratulations to the organizers and volunteers. I'll be back.
By: Richard C.
Posted: May 03, 2005
Great Mid-Size Marathon
My wife and I had a wonderful time. PR's for both of us, with me finally qualifying for Boston. The race itself was nice, with a great view of the Wasatch Mountains, and well-organized. But what we like most was the city. What a nice little town! Clean, wide streets. No crowded restaurants. Nice people. Lots of families. Also, the city got behind this event more than expected for its size. Compared to the Rock and Roll Marathons, which are much bigger, the support at the race and in the local media was outstanding.
Highly recommended.
By: Jim M.
Posted: May 02, 2005
Fantastic Organization
Of my 14 marathons so far, this was one of the very best organized and supported. I was impressed from the transportation to the starting line all the way to the finish and the great finisher medal. The crowds were wonderful, as were the volunteers and police officers. Please don't change a thing other than I wish cell phones were banned from the race.
By: jackie h.
Posted: April 29, 2005
awesome race - highly recommended
Everything about this race was fantastic! The expo was well organized for quick retrieval of packet and goodies. The pasta dinner and accompanying entertainment went well, although the food was just so-so (that's any pasta dinner for ya; we went mainly for the camaraderie). Public transit on race day was free and very convenient; no last-minute worries about parking.
The course itself was beautiful. Almost everywhere we looked, there were snow-capped mountains surrounding us. We mostly traversed through tree-lined streets, and passed a couple of nice parks with lakes. There was a short stretch where we ran on a not-too-busy highway, for about 3 miles or so. Following an almost loop, more like a big u shape, the terrain was mostly downhill grades, with a few challenging but short ascents early on in the course. Water stops had plenty of volunteers helping out. The small-ish field of under 3,000 runners made for easy maneuvering, and I didn't notice any bottlenecks when cutting tangents on the turns.
The finishing chute was the best I have seen, second only to Boston - went through an outdoor mall setting; the crowds were abundant and very supportive, music was great. The medals are substantial. Healthy post-race snacks were supplied by a local whole foods store, and were a welcome change from the typical white bagels and Gatorade fare.
Only one minor complaint: the post-race party would be better attended if held immediately after the race. With the band not starting until 8pm, most people by that time have already grazed or found dinner, and likely prefer to just settle in for the night after an exhausting and enjoyable day.
Otherwise, the experience was wonderful! Kudos to everyone who helped make the event a success.
By: David A.
Posted: April 28, 2005
A great course through a beautiful city!
I really had a great time running the SLC Marathon. I would highly recommend a first-time runner or a seasoned veteran to experience this run. Very well organized race.
By: Melissa Y.
Posted: April 28, 2005
Great Race!
The organization for this race was outstanding. I didn't have any trouble at the aid stations, and the volunteers were great! The city was beautiful, with thousands of tulips to view along the course, as well as views of snowcapped mountains. The finish area was great, with spectators able to watch from above on the second level of the outdoor mall as well as on the street level. The number of racers was great, because there weren't enough to slow you down, but you never felt like you were all alone.
The only negative I found about the race was that on a few of the bigger streets, the one lane that was open to traffic was full of stopped cars with their engines running, so there was a ton of exhaust to inhale in a few sections. I think this may have been on 900 South and/or 400 South.
By: Annette D.
Posted: April 27, 2005
Great race BUT.........
I was amazed at how well the marathon was organized since this was only the second year. I even made that comment to another runner. I would have given the organization 5 stars, were it not for recieving a recycled cup. Now that is just nasty! I have heard that this happens at other races Devine Racing puts on, so I will NOT be running one of their events till I hear this problem is solved.
Other than that, I loved the race. The medals are AWESOME. Huge and heavy, just the way I like them. Very classy. The shirts are very nice as well, though the sizes run large and I was not allowed to exchange mine for a smaller size, so it won't fit. Bummer!
The finish line was very well organized as well. I am not one who likes to hang around and party afterwards, but if I did, I would have had everything I needed right there. They did a great job, but they gotta fix the cup thing!
By: Gordon B.
Posted: April 27, 2005
Solid effort for second year mid-size event
Overall a quality experience, my 40th. Course is easy to run, downhill start and finish. Wide avenues and good traffic control. Many well-staffed water stops. Largely suburban areas, some good mountain views. More spectators in some of the far off parts then you might expect. Nice finish chute and area, adequate food, good entertainment. Major negative is that its on the very expensive side, like a big city event. Includes a concert ticket, but I would rather the pasta party included. Smallish Expo, few 'goodies.' Get there early, start area potty problems. If taking the train from finish area (free),leave lots of time, slow trip. Very nice medal and race program.
By: Scott M.
Posted: April 25, 2005
Once again, an excellent race.
What can I say except that the race organizers again did a great job. Having run this the inaugural year last year I was curious what changes would be made. I was thrilled that any changes were for the better. The crowd was bigger, the spectators better, and the overall experience better. An amazing effort for only the second year. I believe things will only get better (I did by 7 minutes, so who knows next year!)
By: Hazel C.
Posted: April 24, 2005
Highly recommended
Salt Lake City is beautiful! Absolutely great weather and the runners are super nice! They are very encouraging and the spectators are wonderful! Great support! A must-do marathon! I had a wonderful time!
By: Elfi Ortenburger
Posted: April 24, 2005
Thank you Salt Lake City !
My husband and I moved to SLC last year and just had to train for this marathon. It was my 8th and his second marathon. Everything about it was top quality.
We will be back next year !
By: Edward N.
Posted: April 08, 2005
SLC Did A Great Job
You'd never know this was the SLC Marathon's inaugural effort. Maybe the city and organizers had lots of experience putting on large-scale events because of the '02 Olympics. Whatever the reason, this was a well run marathon.
The only negative thing that happened was a bit of confusion about transportation from the race headquarters hotel. Not knowing SLC, I stayed there specifically so I could catch the marathon shuttle bus. The morning of the race, 0600, arrived but no bus. About 0615 a bus arrived but we were told it was for the elite 5K racers only. A group of folks, not race officials, who were familiar with SLC led us to a nearby trolley which took us to the marathon start. Okay, no harm, no foul. But if it hadn't been for those folks I have no idea how I would have gotten to the race.
The course was run through the city and was relatively flat. It was scenic in parts with a terrific view of the mountains but for the most part the course was in a neighborhood environment. The rest stops were well stocked and manned. Traffic control was very good. The race is at altitude, about 4,800 ft, so train for that or expect an altitude penalty on your finish time.
What I remember best were the crowds, people lined the streets just about every step the way. Whole neighborhoods turned out in lawn chairs to watch and cheer us on. I guess race organizers distributed thunder sticks to folks living along the course so they could make lots of noise and not loose their voices. The only time the crowds thinned out were the last three miles or so that are run through one of the main drags downtown. However, the last half mile or so is lined with hundreds of folks cheering you on to the finish.
The medal was huge and the dri-weave training shirt was nice. One cheap shot - and boy, am I reaching here - about the shirt is that the race logo was pretty small. I would recommend to the organizers to make the logo bigger so folks can brag about this race easier.
A final 'Way to go' goes out to a young lady who worked at the clothing pickup area. She spied my race number from about 25 yards away, found my bag, and had it waiting for me when I finally managed to stumble up the baggage area. Now that's a first.
I'd run SLC again. I'm not sure if it could get any better, but I hear (not confirmed) that all of 05's finishers will get a commemorative DVD. I’ve never seen that before but it shows how the organizers are working to improve on an already good race.
By: Katrina F.
Posted: September 28, 2004
Something for everyone.
For the first-timer and for the multi-marathoner, this run seemed to have something positive for each. We began at 42 degrees but warmed up soon enough to the pleasant 60's. Altitude coming from sea level didn't bother me except for light headaches for 2 days prior to race.
What a fun train system! Some scenic views and pretty nice ending coming up to the capitol building. I'd overheard other runners say only one officer had volunteered to help by the eve of the race so all others were ordered in but hard to believe because the officers were all so nice & encouraging. Thought there'd be a LOT more music per pre-race hype... did appreciate those people who had their boom boxes & car stereos going. Where were the bands? How about getting together some sub-groups for camaraderie? I'd love to meet other moms of 4 or more kids who marathon or others from the southeast, etc.
Couldn't find massage area at end and family members didn't know where to go for the en masse t.v. viewing. Little help there. Also, I didn't get the promised finish-line photo!! Told the cameras glitched. My hometown running store was looking forward to that official shot. Thanks for the concert and goodies. Hope to be back in 2005.
By: Mary S.
Posted: August 25, 2004
I would never recommend this race.
I have run almost 30 marathons and this one was one of the worst. I was expecting great scenery, but it was just so-so. You run along a highway for a good stretch, which was extremely boring. Yes, it was a late start, no they didn't have enough porta potties along the course as people were hitting all the gas stations and businesses along the course, and the expo was a bit dismal. The one thing that was very, very eerie was the HUGE amount of police support - they were everywhere, at one point I was passed by 24 of them on motorcycles. It was like they were expecting a riot or something. The medal was good though. None of the group of us enjoyed it, and none will do it again.
By: Mandy H.
Posted: May 25, 2004
I wish they did this one twice a year!
Fans were the best I'd seen since I ran in the NY Marathon! Awesome expo! Excellent post-race snacks! Great dogs all over the course. I love those 4-legged fans...
By: Scott M.
Posted: May 10, 2004
OUTSTANDING inaugural event
The Inaugural SLC Marathon was also my first! I was extremely impressed with the organization of the race. The spectators were incredible and the weather was great to boot! I will forever remember the sensation of turning north into the Gateway for the last 1/2 mile and seeing the crowds 6-8 people deep along the course and on the balconies. If you want to feel like an Olympic athlete, this was the place to be! (Although the cobblestone crosswalks in the Gateway made my feet shout in pain).
I would recommend this marathon for both first-timers and veterans. The few kinks I did notice will be worked out by next year for sure. (The first water station could not keep up with the masses and the Sugarhouse water station was low on water - but the other 12 stations were fabulous).
Living in SLC I'm glad to say we have a new GREAT marathon!
By: Dale M.
Posted: May 06, 2004
Olympic Style!
It was my first marathon, and it was great! Congratulations to Salt Lake City - there was so much energy everywhere. This one promises to be popular!
By: Jim Skibo
Posted: May 04, 2004
Great urban course w/ great support.
Great scenery, very friendly supporters, lots of unexpected goodies from local neighborhoods, great weather (cool start to moderate finish). Despite being surrounded by 8-9,000-foot mountains, the course was relatively flat going from 4,797’ down to 4,382’ with a total of 479’ of ascent and 1072’ of descent. A hill or two early on, but nothing to get excited about.
Organization was just superb. I expected some inaugural glitches and found none. The altitude did affect me, but it was the first time I’ve ever run anything above 1000 feet. Felt kind of odd the whole race... never was able to zone out. But I finished and felt good, so that’s all that counts for me. Having a few thousand spectators at the end was kind of cool.
The finisher’s medal is well fashioned and stands out among my other medals (although the Mercedes logo’d medal for the Birmingham Mercedes Marathon is a tough act to follow!!).
There were the typical refreshments after the race and the awards ceremony was later that night preceding a B52’s concert. Definitely cool and it gave a nice audience for those who received an award.
My only criticism is that there was absolutely no seating anywhere after the race. If you wanted to hang with your fellow runners after the race, you didn’t have any place to sit and do that unless you wanted to camp on an asphalt parking lot. Need a large tent with seats or direct runners to the old but cool Union Pacific railroad station that is very close.
This race and the Birmingham, AL Mercedes Marathon are my favorites so far. I think I’d do this one again next year.
Jim in Dallas
By: David W.
Posted: May 04, 2004
A great first-time effort for SLC!
SLC was my 10th marathon, and certainly one of my favorites. The city itself is beautiful and the course showed off much of the same. Nothing nicer than running when it is 60 degrees and sunny, with snow on the mountains in the distance!
The crowd support was very good, especially for a first-time marathon. Other than a dry stretch from about miles 15 to 19, there were good crowds along the course who had words of encouragement and support for the runners.
The only complaint I have was the lack of any digital time clocks on the course. The folks who stayed out there for 5+ hours to orally state the mile-splits are to be commended, but I was bothered about the lack of a clock at the finish line!!
Being from the East Coast, the altitude did take its toll on me during the latter stages of the race, but this is a race definitely worth running for the experience, even if it isn't a PR course.
Way to go SLC! Hopefully I'll be back next year.
By: Kirk H.
Posted: May 03, 2004
Nice job, SLC!!
My first marathon, so nothing to compare it to. I can say that I'm hooked, and hope that other marathons I will run in the future will measure up. Perfect weather that day. Nice scenery and great crowd support. Having trained in the flatlands, I was a little anxious about the course. Not a problem, first half was mostly downhill and shallow grades, second half was flat.
By: Roger H.
Posted: May 03, 2004
Well organized, scenic and a smart course
For a primarily urban marathon, this is quite scenic with the Wasatch Mountains always in view. Aid stations and overall operational organization was great! The course profile was unique in that there were significant downhills but almost compensating uphills in the first half (better there than in the second half)! In the second half it flattens out and the last 7-8 miles have a wonderful slight downhill bias. It was inclined just enough to give one that little extra boost to really keep you rolling just when you need it! Brilliant! Do be prepared for some altitude effect, however. My flatlander's heartrate was about 5-8 beats over normal the whole way and that takes some toll.
That's the good news, but there is room for improvement in a couple of areas. First, better maps and/or directions to the pasta dinner (many, many people got lost or misdirected) and also to the start. Race officials need to understand that out-of-towners don't know the local sites and often don't have the time or vehicles to pre-locate them. And, PLEASE forget the rock band at the pasta dinner! Any marathon runner will tell you that they want to kibitz with fellow runners at the dinner, not have their eardrums blown out by a performance such as this year!
And, finally, I don't know how successful the B-52 party was, but if it was a bit lightly attended, it's because most runners, I think, would prefer to have the awards right after the race and crash rather than going to a party at 7 PM.
Overall, I still give this marathon high marks (I have completed 94). Thanks!
By: Erin L.
Posted: May 02, 2004
A race worth running!
Salt Lake City did a wonderful job setting up the inaugural marathon. The weather couldn't have been more perfect, the course was great, and the supporting crowds and volunteers helped to make this event worth every step!!
By: Jim D.
Posted: April 30, 2004
Good inaugural marathon
I have had bad luck with extremely poor organization at previous inaugural marathons before (San Diego Rock and Roll '98, Miami '03, and Phoenix RnR '04, so I was expecting the worst.
Salt Lake City was the best of the bunch. The race did start about 15 minutes late and the sound system was so poor that I didn't hear anything before the race started (and I was near the front of the lineup), and the fireworks at the beginning of the race left a nice cloud of noxious smoke to run through, but other than these small and correctable issues, it was a well run event.
The course was very friendly. Downhill or flat most of the way with only a few little hills or upgrades. The course ran through two parks and had nice views of various snowcapped mountains for much of the race. The course was open to traffic on the opposite side of the road for significant portions of the race and the emissions testing in the state of Utah must not be particularly good.
The finish of the race was through a crowded open air mall and was pretty exciting. I train at sea level and didn't think that the altitude affected me much, although I was at about 75% effort to begin with from an injury I had going in. That I still finished in one piece is testament to the relative ease of the course.
The expo was good, although in a weird setup in multiple rooms at the Marriot. The post-race eats and massage were above average. The long-sleeve Cool Max shirt is a functional and welcome addition to my mostly cotton marathon shirts. The medal is nicer than average.
All in all, a recommended marathon.
By: Colleen Eren
Posted: April 30, 2004
Olympic finish, beautiful run
This was my first marathon, and it was fantastic--an absolutely beautiful course, with the first 10 or so miles in full view of the beautiful Wysach mountains. The weather was perfect--cool, but not damp. Some complained of the 'altitude' component, but I was not really affected. Mostly flat, with a few rolling hills and a generally downward grade. With only 2,500 runners you are able to get a fast start. Though the crowds were scant, those who were there were incredibly supportive and enthusiastic. Split markers were off a few times, and the race started about 15 minutes late. The runners from Utah are among the friendliest I've encountered, especially coming from New York :). Overall, definitely worth the effort, and finishing off in the Olympic Village leaves you feeling like a star. Bravo!
By: James W.
Posted: April 30, 2004
Pulled off a great first marathon
I found the first SLC marathon to be well organized. The expo had some good vendors. The start will get crowded if the marathon grows. Also the sound system needs some work. The crowds were spotty but enthusiastic. I ran with the pace group and that kept me and my fellow runners upbeat. I will be back to this one next year.
By: peter s.
Posted: April 29, 2004
Awsome and fun!!
Things were great. Start to finish the organization was great. One thing for next year: there are better courses thoughout the valley with better views.
By: JOHN C.
Posted: April 28, 2004
Couldn't ask for a better run race
The volunteers and police support were awesome. The weather was warm - but not that bad. The city was friendly with a lot of course support from the spectators. Yes - I will be back. One small problem - no pins for the race number in my packet.
By: Tara B.
Posted: April 28, 2004
Amazing
Being my first marathon, I really didn't know what to expect, but the experience was amazing. The many spectators were very supportive and kept me going. Thanks to all the citizens of Salt Lake. I can't wait until next year!!
By: Slow Joe
Posted: April 27, 2004
Great job SLC!
I loved everything about this marathon, from the participation to the scenery. The course could have been a bit less downhill, but it was still good. With only 3,200 runners, I was able to get up to pace quick. This will eventually get a lot more participation, so sign up for 2005 if you like a smaller field of runners. Also, coming from Cleveland, Ohio and never running in altitude, I did not find this to be a problem.
By: Michael Bower
Posted: April 26, 2004
A Glorious Beginning to SLC Marathon History
As a dyed-in-the-wool member of the penguin squad, I must say this was an exceptional inaugural marathon effort by everyone involved. The course could hardly have been more beautiful, starting at U of U's Olympic Legacy Bridge, heading south along the Wasatch Mountains front to the halfway mark, turning west along the Van Winkle (perhaps the only dull part of the course), then north, back toward downtown SLC, around and through a number of city parks, then back to Gateway Center. The entire course was lined with cheering locals who had no problem letting us know how proud they were of us and their city for putting on the event.
I've run Portland, so I know post-run good food... and SLC came in a VERY CLOSE second (thanks for the ice cold milk!!). My only criticism is of the time of the post-race awards ceremony/party. I finished the race at noon... and really wanted to see the B-52s... but couldn't get myself back downtown from my motel for a 7pm concert... just too 'knackered'. Perhaps that says more about me than it does about race/event organization? All in all, a brilliant event! And, I set a PR.
By: Bridger F.
Posted: April 26, 2004
First Ever SLC Marathon Was Great
My compliments go out to the SLC Marathon race organizers of the inaugural SLC Marathon. Course was great and the organization during the race was outstanding. Crowd support covered the entire course and culminated in an amazing finish line area.
By: Jeff W.
Posted: April 26, 2004
GREAT first year event!
OUTSTANDING first year event! This is sure to become a destination marathon for the masses! A GREAT day, and a true celebration of the sport!
The Salt Lake crowds were amazing - I was nowhere near the front of the field, but was never lacking enthusiastic support from great crowds.
The last half mile (or so) was one of the most memorable finishes in my 27 marathons -- truly worth the effort.
A couple SMALL wrinkles in organization were overshadowed by outstanding hospitality from race organizers. A+++ on the 'Men's Restroom' at the start -- an idea whose TIME HAS COME!
The altitude was tough on this low-lander. But I'll be back!
By: sinead m.
Posted: April 26, 2004
I highly recommend this scenic, beautiful course!
Salt Lake City's inaugural 2004 race was my 7th marathon. It was very well organized from start to finish. 90% of the participants are from Salt Lake City. I traveled from NY. It was a very scenic race and the course has the potential to be a very fast race if you do not have problems adjusting to the altitude (the altitude slowed me down). The course has a few rolling hills, but other than that it was flat or downhill. the volunteers were terrific and water/Gatorade stations were located every 2 miles. The weather was beautiful as well, which is always a plus!
By: Diem-Quyen Le
Posted: April 26, 2004
My Dream Marathon
I came to Salt Lake City with an injured leg, but except for that, the race was everything I'd dreamed of in a perfect marathon. Despite the pain, my spirits were high all through the race, thanks to unparalleled spectator support, the flat, wide and scenic course (the breathtaking snowcapped Wasatch Mountain literally kept my chin up!), and beautiful spring weather. Aid stations were well manned and finish line food was plentiful. The medal and NordicTrack T-shirt were also very nice. I just hope the travel info on the race website will be more updated next year.
Thank you for helping me through the most difficult miles, Cindy (runner from Utah). Thanks for an outstanding job, Scott Kerr! Salt Lake City definitely took another gold medal with its inaugural marathon. Runners, you don't want to miss this race!!!
By: Stuart Graves
Posted: April 26, 2004
Amazing crowd support for a 1st year marathon!
This was the 1st Salt Lake City Marathon. The number and the enthusiasm of the supporters who came out was truly amazing.
The course was spectacular (snowcapped mountains, blooming trees, etc), and the weather was perfect.
It's obvious the organizers did their homework in pulling off this inaugural marathon!
By: Robert L.
Posted: April 25, 2004
Okay for the 1st time... can be better
I thought the start was okay and the first half was fantastic. Beautiful setting through neighborhoods and lots of spectators supporting the runners. Once you got through Liberty Park, it was desolate... nobobdy to cheer you on when you really needed it. I'll never forget the State Street scene with nobody out there... just you and the pavement. Should try to end in one of the parks, either Liberty or Pioneer.
There should be clear markings of the end point so that you can see it in the distance and muster that last drive. Once I got to Gateway, I couldn't see the end but the crowd there was great. Keep non-entrants off the course. The first water station was too soon and it was understaffed. One reason could have been the non-entrants overloading the station. I didn't see a first aid station throughout the race, even though they were supposed to have been there. Perhaps they need to better marked. Overall, I thought you did a great job for first-timers... congratulations!!
By: Lisa S.
Posted: April 25, 2004
I was proud to be a Salt Lake City runner
I liked to course except for two aspects:
1) The jaunt up and around Liberty Park lacked purpose other than to meet up with the 5K starting point. I would rather make up that distance early on in the race and then take a straight shot down 5th East which was suprisingly shaded and filled with spectators;
2) The cobblestones in the Gateway were scary -seriously scary. I thought I might loose my footing and fall since my reflexes at that point were shut down.
I loved the crowd support. Really. I was so proud of Salt Lake. I wish the support could have somehow continued downtown. It would have been great to see more people in the last few miles.
By: Aubrey H.
Posted: April 25, 2004
Great course, better spectators.
This was my third marathon and I was blown away by the support of the spectators. Even the guy holding doughnuts was outstanding. The day was perfect and the course was great. The only thing about it was the ending, it was a bottle neck at the end and the snacks were harder to get than the water on the first aid station. All in all I had a blast, and to top it off, the 'B-52's' were, as always, worth the effort.
By: grua j.
Posted: April 25, 2004
Delightful and fast
What a great job done on this new marathon. Well organized from start to finish. Compliments to the marathon staff. All interested in a good April run, this should be on the short list. I do worry that someday they will be snowed out, but this day was perfect.
By: Dani N.
Posted: April 25, 2004
The Salt Lake Marathon was a success!
Luckily the day was nice - I don't know how it would have been with rain - so we enjoyed perfect running temperatures. For being the first time this race was run, a surprising amount of people lined the streets to cheer! It seemed like half the city was out there! The course was a good one, with a few hills up and down but nothing major. I was surprised by how great the stuff was after the finish line (the Galivan Center). They had nice medals and lots of food, though not quite the variety I've seen in other marathons. They had Gatorade and water every couple of miles and Cliff Shots at a few stations along the way, so I had plenty of fuel. In all, this was a successful marathon.
By: bob qwerty
Posted: April 25, 2004
I'd say pretty good, for the 1st year
All I have to complain about is the lack of clocks, mats at the beginning, and lack of board for results.
By: Jan H.
Posted: April 24, 2004
Very close to perfect
Wonderful weather, nice transportation to the starting line, great course with impressive security and potential to accommodate many more runners next year.
By: Holly S.
Posted: April 24, 2004
Dream come true 1st marathon!!!!!!!
This was my very 1st marathon. I had the best time running the course because of the picture perfect weather and the absolute beauty of the mountains. What inspired me the most was the love and support of the crowds cheering us on. They were awesome!!!! Way to go Salt Lake City!!!!!
By: Mike Rosner
Posted: April 24, 2004
Excellent
The organizers did an excellent job for this inaugural event--there must be some veterans in the group because they thought of everything. It wasn't a factor this year but I hope they have a plan to help warm the runners before the race starts, because it can be very cold in SLC in April. The volunteers were exceptionally friendly and helpful. A young woman at the sweat bag pick-up area had my bag for me almost before I got there. The course is great if you like to run through neighborhoods. Spectators turned out in good numbers and were plenty noisy. There were lots of goodies at the finish when I got there in just under 4 hours. I'll keep coming back as long as this marathon is as much fun as it was this year.