Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Toronto Waterfront Marathon
Back

Toronto Waterfront Marathon - Race Reviews

3.4
Average rating based on 228 Reviews

By: Sanjay Mohanta

Posted: November 03, 2016

My 89th marathon!!! Great for local runners

I have run this race many times and it is not bad but the city could do a lot more for the runners. in Montreal the subway was free for participants and was open early prior to the race. This was not the case for TO Waterfront marathon. It made getting around expensive and overly complicated. the package pickup was pricey since it costs $14 to park. I prefer the pick up took place at City Hall since it close to subways, etc., The other problem with City Hall is that it is blocked but fences with small openings. It creates bottlenecks when the race starts. The race is okay but not as good as it could be. The shirt had a nice design but was a bit small for me. After 89 pasta dinners I would prefer something a bit larger for my frame. Yeah. Anyway, great for local runners. Some areas where you are cheered by no-one though.
3.0

By: Peter M.

Posted: May 05, 2016

Fast course, great organization

I've run this marathon for the second time since 2008 (my first) and got a PR and a BQ. Very well organized race with plenty of water stations, large expo and enthusiastic volunteers. Course is mostly flat and fast, if not very scenic. One part that should be eliminated is the out-and-back on Bayview Extension along Don River. Crowd support is somewhat lacking but that's always the case with Torontonians. They mostly gripe about runners blocking traffic. At least this year we had Bridge The Gap urban running crew gathering, so in a few spots it felt like Boston or NYC. I wish they could do this every year. Also, more support and promotion from the city would be nice. Finish area is crowded. One other thing to be aware about is streetcar tracks - There's plenty of them, and they can trip you up. I will run this race again because it's about the best you can expect in Canada.
4.0

By: Laurie M.

Posted: April 03, 2016

Fast but disappointing.

I was disappointed in this race. Touted as a 'waterfront' marathon, one really had to stretch a neck to see water anywhere along the course. A good portion of the race was on a highway (or underneath a highway) and through construction. The sections downtown and through the Beaches community were nice. Spectators were sparse except for The Beaches and the finish line. Drivers in cars seemed angry at the road closures. It is however a fairly fast race.
3.0

By: Meg S.

Posted: October 29, 2015

Good race but not great

This race is definitely geared more toward the half marathon. In general the race was very well run, the volunteers were the best I've ever seen. The expo was ok, but I was disappointed in the race merchandise, everything was too big! I was also disappointed in the spectators, more than once I was forced to detour around people crossing the course in the middle of a pack of runners, and my sister was hit by a cyclist! There also seemed to be a lack of excitement in the city for the race the whole weekend, although maybe I'm just more used to the U.S. feel. Some of the neighborhoods did do a great job of getting out there and cheering though, to give credit where credit due. Overall a good fast course, although mentally challenging with the long stretches and turnarounds. I enjoyed it but probably won't be back.
4.0

By: Scott F.

Posted: October 20, 2015

This is geared towards the 1/2 more than full

This is a flat course, very few hills which were overpasses. The first half is fairly nice most of the second half was BORING. They claim 26,000 runners only 3,800 run the full so it really is geared to 1/2 runners. Expo not bad - all volunteers were wonderful the Dream Team folks were the best ever. NOT enough food at the end. Put the date on the shirt, expected a better goodie bag for a big city race. I have already told some of my running friends to skip this race even though the city is wonderful. I didn't expect much given some of past comments so not real disappointment. I went, I conquered it and home healthy is all I wanted.
3.0

By: Sanjay M.

Posted: October 20, 2015

My 75th Marathon! Cold, just cold.

Hey I ran my 40th, 49th and 60th marathon here. It was natural I would do my 75th here as well. It is a good course with the first part going up around cool neighborhoods like the Annex and near King West. Some great bands on the course - the Greek one around 38k had lots of energy. The problem was City Hall. In previous years runners could stay there prior to the race. Since Rob Ford left office this has been closed to the public. In the cold morning this is a problem. Maybe the TTC can also operate a bit early on this Sunday so parking would not be such a problem. Also paying $14 for packet pick up is a rip off. Why they don't move it closer to the subway line I have no idea. A good race if you live in the area and the expo is very strong but these little things leave a bad taste in my mouth. I will be doing it again next year hoping these things can be ironed out.
3.0

By: Joe T.

Posted: April 30, 2015

Fast flat race, not too many turns. Great finish

This was my first marathon and I really enjoyed it. The course is fairly flat except a few overpasses. Crowds are here and there and are semi-enthusiastic. It is a pretty epic finish in downtown Toronto and the crowds are quite big. I liked the signs at the end every 100m so you know when the pain will stop! My biggest complaint is that the food after the race is not healthy bananas etc...it is prepackaged processed food that was probably provided free by sponsors.
4.0

By: Joe M.

Posted: April 15, 2015

Nice course well organized

This was my first North American marathon. Pre race expo was good though was a little disappointed that I couldn't exchange my very large t-shirt for a smaller one, also a lack of general race memorabilia for sale. Race was very well organized and the course was very flat. Lots of space to run right from the start. There is also a half marathon which seems to be more popular so be prepared for a big drop off in spectators from half way. Expo was easy to get to with free buses from downtown. City is a typical large city but the people were very friendly. If you're looking for a laid back marathon with lots of room to run I would recommend Toronto.
4.0

By: Dawn L.

Posted: April 05, 2015

Great race! You should go.

I have a soft spot for Toronto Waterfront. I've had huge PR's both times I've run it. The organization is top-notch, the course is quick (it's not pancake flat, but you could hardly call it hilly), and the size is exactly what I like - not too big, not too small. I am completely impressed with the folks at CRS who put the race on. They are very engaged with the participants on social media and the attention to detail on race day is fantastic. It's also great that there are so many hotels in staggering distance from the finish line. You can wobble your way to the hotel with minimal agony...relatively speaking, of course.
4.0

By: Frank M.

Posted: October 27, 2014

Flat and Fast!

Overall I really liked the course; for it served as a flat and fast Boston Qualifier. The crowd support was excellent in spots, but you had numerous 'dead periods' where you were kind of isolated. The expo at Exhibition Place was really large and had many options but it was crowded and lines were extremely long (perhaps the expo has outgrown their space!) Overall, this race is an event I would recommend doing at least once.
4.0

By: Sanjay Mohanta

Posted: October 21, 2014

My 60th Marathon!

I normally start off talking about the good but I want to get the bad out of the way first. 1. Parking. I had to pay $14 for parking to get the race kit. I thought this was a rip off. I prefer the organizors chose a place near a subway stop with parking close by. This is a constant complaint and not a good way to start a race. 2. Massages - most races have free massages. Here - you buy them. I just did PEC a couple of weeks ago and massages were free. Just a thought. Here are the positives: 1. Shirt - most shirts from Canada are like Canadians - low key, quiet, and a shade dull. This was not the case! This is a great improvement over the past years. 2. Medal: I will take everything back if they make this the defacto medal every year and race shirt photo. I love that they chose Honest Ed's as the TO symbol. It was a special place for minorities in the 70s and 80s before chain grocery stores sold spices. My parents would take me there on the weekends in winter when Gerard Street was too far and cold. Nice Touch. Rename the race to Honest Ed's and I will be back next year.
3.0

By: Chris W.

Posted: October 20, 2014

Over-Rated. Fast, but definitely not festive.

The course is fast, but the scenery and enthuiasm was lac-lustre. In a metropolitan city you would expect large crowds and energy. Very few bands or DJ's playing on the course and I did not feel motivated. The shirt and medal were decent, but I was disappointed in the race atmosphere. Race food was mediocre (a very cold banana, some type of stale bread and a few odd extras. It would have been beneficial to have a protein shake or chocolate milk. I only ran the half since I am running NYC in two weeks. My sister ran the full marathon and acknowledged that the course was fast, but boring and had no energy. Furthermore, the city roads were in rough shape and you had to be aware of street car tracks. The marathon and the half start at the same time and they basically loop the marathoners back (which is confusing and un-necessary. The race expo was well organized. It was easy to pick up race kit, but I did not see any speakers or things to draw my attention to. The weather was ideal, and I am sure that I could have easily run a PB if I were racing this course and not using it as an easy training run. If you are looking for a fast track - this is flat and fast. If you are looking to be energized and blown away by Scenery - stay away. This race appears has a corporate feel - I would take a small town marathon over this race any day.
3.0

By: Apacacio Q.

Posted: December 05, 2013

GREAT PLACE TO RUN

If you are worry to run an International Marathon, because you are concern on how you may do, TORONTO is the place to LEAVE FEAR AT HOME, TORONTO WATERFRONT is a unique race to improve yor TIME, in everysingle aspect. Organization was very high quality, Course is great, Start with downslope, then pretty flat and only hard at the last mile with a mild climb. OF COURSE YOU MUST TRAIN in order to complete the race
5.0

By: Frédéric L.

Posted: October 21, 2013

Great Race!

Good marathon expo with free shuttles to and from downtown hotel. The course is fast and flat, with only a few inclines. Has the potential to be affected by winds but we had great weather! Marathon and Half start together but with corrals and wave starts, we had no problem finding our pace. First half has more interesting scenery but second half has more crowd support, except for a few less interesting sections along the industrial district. Some out-and-backs sections with hairpin turns. It slows you down a bit but you can see your runner friends! Many well operated water stations, 2 gel stations, wonderful volunteers (thanks!)and great weather. It has been pointed out in earlier comments that post race lunch was minimal with bagels, water/gatorade yogurts and bananas. It is still true,but not uncommon for large marathons. Also, there were a few sponsors at the finishing site and handing out fruit juices, power bars and ice cream treats, so it wasn't so bad!
4.0

By: Canadian Runner

Posted: October 20, 2013

Needs work...

To be fair, the weather was perfect after a miserable, rainy day yesterday. Also, I ran Chicago one week ago and the exhilaration and excitement of the crowds is not found in Toronto. At all. Looking at my finisher medal for 2013 it says '14th annual'. I thought this marathon was one of the classics that had been around for years. I just didn't feel motivated by the crowds here even though the folks who did come out to cheer us on really tried. I guess I was hoping we would be treated to all the areas that make up Toronto (similar to Chicago) but we were sent running west on Lakeshore, with little to look at and no crowd support, then headed east to the Beaches with a little more crowd support. I'm recovering from an Achilles strain so I was an end-of-the-liner but I finished and was happy with my medal. Of course I'll be back next year, and I get why the marathon course is set up this way (Toronto drivers, I'm sure, would be rioting if a marathon cut through their streets preventing them from getting out...the way it was, there were enormous traffic jams). The other runners were so much fun, easy to talk to and towards the end it was nice to find someone to walk with while exchanging old war stories about our injuries and motivate each other to keep going and make it to the finish. That part - motivating and connecting with the other participants - is what it's all about. It took me forever to finish, but I felt good that this was such a friendly group of runners who had my back and vice versa.
2.0

By: Greg N.

Posted: November 02, 2012

Poor course

I am at a loss to understand with all the wonderful areas to run in Toronto why the race is pushed down to the water treatment plant and boring dock areas. Having run several marathons in the US I find most Canadian races are run through uninspiring areas with little fan support and dull scenery. The other disappointment was the finish line area. Long walk to the food and disappointing when you got there. After running 26 miles a bagel and more water or gatorade isn't what a runner is looking for. Cleveland marathon had ice cold chocolate milk and great cookies at the finish. Fantastic !!!!
2.0

By: Jonathan L.

Posted: October 26, 2012

So glad to run this!

I usually run the Goodlife Fitness Marathon here in May; the way the calendar fell in place this fall allowed me to run both Chicago and Toronto, and the Toronto Waterfront Marathon was really a great event (getting in the start wave was a hassle, but quickly forgotten). Great course and energy.
5.0

By: Keith Robinson

Posted: October 23, 2012

Good, could be world class

I flew over from the UK to run Toronto and wasn't disappointed: personal best time and first Vet 60+. The course is fast but the long wide highways make it difficult to run the tangents - can we have a 'race line' as in London etc? A bit chaotic at the start, better at the finish, good crowds but some long lonely stretches. Also NB I stayed at the Metropolitan which was HOPELESS, avoid that. I ran with no breakfast. Overall, well done Toronto.
3.0

By: juan m.

Posted: October 17, 2012

Awesome!

I am so glad I chose Toronto marathon as my 3rd marathon. What a beautiful City! I came here to destroy my personal best but due to rain, slippery roads, High winds I missed to run a PB. But everyone from top to bottom ran slow in second half due to weather. COURSE: Nice course! You can run a personal best. Nice incline to start then flat, down hill, mostly flat for 30k last 12k are rolling inclines and and nasty wind. But it is a fast course. My only problem was 2 things 4 hairpin turns and the nasty weather! I will recommend this race! And I will be back! The Race Director Mr. Brookes i met him at finish line and got to shake his hand! Very nice gentleman. I <3 TO RUN TO!!!
5.0

By: Sanjay Mohanta

Posted: October 16, 2012

my 40th Marathon!!

What a way to run my 40th marathon! A great city (best theatre in North America, best restaurants and a fight club for artists!). It was quite an experience meeting runners from all my various races throughout the course. Chatting with Scott from the TO Ultra Marathon in January, George who ran 400k in 72 hours in Phoenix, Dr. Raymond who ran his 277th marathon, the other maniacs and finally Peter Donato. There were some problems though: 1. Starting line: Fences kept runners out and was chaos prior to the race. Don't need them or atleast not as many as them. Better if race kit tells you which street your corral was at 2. No Vaseline stations 3. Only one gel station 4. No Gatorade at the station at 14k 5. Barren landscape on Lakeshore Blvd - should loop down Bloor to Dufferin and down on Ossington to Queen or something Not to sound negative but the race did feature a good expo, great medals and good bands. Thanks to all the runners in the subway ride back for a fun way to run 40 marathons. My 4 am alarms, twice a day training, mileage on my car, excessive registration fees were worth it. See you in Columbia City, Indiana! Sanjay
2.0

By: Dawn L.

Posted: October 16, 2012

Loved it!

You can tell the race organizers took the bag check comments from 2011 to heart. There were no issues whatsoever this year. I thought the course was great (twists and turns, but I'd take that over a lot of hills) and I was pleasantly surprised how many spectators were on course. The water station volunteers were outstanding and, again, I was surprised how many people were holding out cups at each station. Nice work, everyone. I would happily come back.
5.0

By: Rod Henning

Posted: October 15, 2012

Top Notch All Around

Every aspect of this marathon is well done. From registration through email update to the expo and the race they got it right. The one thing they don't control is the weather. And when they get that nice cold clear windless October day it will make for excellent running. I believe the changes from last year made for a huge improvement in the organization. To me things went off seamlessly. A couple of suggestions would be maps of the start and finish area. It wasn't hard to find the entrance to the corrals but having a picture of how it was controlled would have been nice. Also the finish area was the same. Maybe I just didn't see the maps. Just copy the Boston booklet. I actually only ran the half so can't comment on the whole course but I enjoyed the front side. I am not a real fan of multiple races starting at the same time, but if you have to do it this worked well. Does give a 'larger' marathon feel at the start. Separation at the end was good. My only criticism is of the pasta dinner at the Trattoria Mercatto. And this really has little to do with the race. They had a marathon special but they really missed the boat on quantity. You'd have thought they would have made up on quality but the portions were small and cold. In the end probably the right amount but not what you expect. Overall a great event.
4.0

By: Chuck L.

Posted: October 14, 2012

Not bad

Generally not bad but there were lineups at every porto potty. In Chicago it was a lot better. I get it...porto potties cost a lot of money and each extra one takes away from the bottom line...but for the average runner...this is important.
3.0

By: Michele B.

Posted: October 30, 2011

Nearly a perfect day

The baggage pick up has been written about and it truly did suck. However, I sent an e-mail to the race director the following day making some suggestions to fix the problems and within 24 hours he got back to me saying it was already being restructured. Everything else was great: the course offered a chance to see the leaders, the rolling terrain made things interesting, the neighbourhoods were tremendously supportive and the medal is very nice. The t-shirt is OK and the post-race food could be improved quite a bit. Overall, I'd still recommend this race - but don't kid yourself, it isn't pancake flat.
4.0

By: Chuck L.

Posted: October 22, 2011

Great race.....BUT!

I was very lucky to avoid the bag check fiasco as my office overlooks the finish line. I saw what a mess it was. Alan Brookes has acknowledged it and promised it won't happen again. I think it will be sorted out next year...just a one year hiccup. That being said, a problem like this will cause people to skip this race in the future.....it is that important to get things like this right.
3.0

By: Wai H.

Posted: October 22, 2011

A lesson for organizers

The course may be flat, the fans may have been out there, but the organizers messed up the finish area. The bag check was a, in their own words, a disaster (http://yumkerun.blogspot.com/2011/10/utter-fiasco-that-was-scotiabank.html). They want to keep their silver rating, they should focus on serving their runners, not trying to create press out of prize money or singling out great runners. There are the other of runners  thousands of them  that your race will depend its reputation for. You let them down.
3.0

By: Alfonso L.

Posted: October 22, 2011

It was flat, fast and festive but..,

the organization was poor, especially at the baggage pick up. After Marathon, you can't stop and wait for more than one hour
4.0

By: Chris W.

Posted: October 21, 2011

Not bad, but not great

This was my 5th marathon and the first that I would not recommend running (but just barely - it was fine). It was quite windy, but I don't think that is clouding my judgment. There were enough drawbacks that I would skip this in the future. Pros: Good fast course, downtown start and finish, fairly good crowd support, some beautiful parts of the course, well organized water/Gatorade stations, very friendly runners. Cons: Expensive ($13) parking for packet pickup/Expo, hidden porta-potties at the start (I didn't see a single one), some ugly industrial areas on the course, subpar post-race food and the first water available was a pretty long walk from the finish, ugly race shirt (I will likely never wear it). I didn't get caught up in the bag pickup debacle, but it's pretty funny that this is the only race I have heard of with a fee for bag check.
3.0

By: Jimmy J.

Posted: October 20, 2011

Toronto

Now I remember why I haven't run this marathon in 3 years. Flat, fast & Festive? Try: Boring, Boring, Boring!!! The course is boring, with out-and-backs through industrial areas in town, it's fast if there isn't the usual headwind from the lake, the crowds are thin and unenthusiastic in typical Toronto fashion. The Bag Claim which cost $2 was a disaster. I heard one friend waited until 3:45pm to get her bag and she finished her Half Marathon at 11am!!! I went around the back and got roughed up by a cop when I tried to get my bag. I finally saw a 'Race Official' standing beside my bag and he threw it to me over the fence without even verifying my bib #!! How secure is that!!! This race is not worthy of it's IAAF Silver Medal Distinction. World Class? Hardly!
1.0

By: Erika M.

Posted: October 19, 2011

Terrible Bag Pick-up Issues

I don't ever plan on running this marathon again. I've run many small and large marathons (7 now) and have NEVER seen such a mess before. I stood in the mob of people for over an HOUR waiting to get my checked bag. After pushing your body to its limit running 26.2 miles, the last thing you need is to stand in the cold for over an hour in tight cramped quarters with thousands of runners! My entire body starting shaking from cold and exhaustion. Luckily I found a friend, who eventually hopped the fence and went in back to get our bags. To funnel 5K, half marathon, and marathon runners; thousands of people; into such small quarters is rediculous. Obviously that was a problem waiting to happen! And we paid and Extra $2 for this privilege!
3.0

By: Linda H.

Posted: October 18, 2011

Not flat, not pretty but spectators great

The Good: Fabulous volunteers and lots of them. Well organized water stations - told as you were getting close that Gatorade would be first and water second (distinctive cups). Superb spectators/bands/music especially through the Beaches. Nice medal and great warming 'blankets'. Good bus service to the Expo. The Bad: Not a very exciting or attractive course and definitely not pancake flat as they say. The last 10 K are rolling inclines which were OK but not fun as there was a strong headwind (not the organizers fault!). Very poor Expo, lousy shirts which were too small and we were not permitted to exchange for another size. Bag check at the start was good but totally chaotic at the end when they opened it up for everyone to rush into the area and try to find their bag. Food was poor - banana, apple and bagel only and you had to hunt for water (not handed to you as you came through). Much preferred the Toronto Goodlife Fitness marathon route and Expo.
4.0

By: Chris R.

Posted: October 18, 2011

Great Marathon...Still a Little Work To Do

The course is great. Spectator support is pretty sparse for a big city marathon. The exhibition, start and the actual race was well organized but the finish was a 'gong show.' Waited 1.5 hrs in the baggage pick-up line before finally getting my checked bag. If they can iron out the finish area issues it will be one of the best!
4.0

By: Kevin H.

Posted: October 17, 2011

Solid Race in a World-Class City

Fun race in some challenging conditions - the last 5 miles or so of the course was right into a strong headwind and made for a tough finish. Pros: Great pasta feed. Really good expo and gear. Great city, mostly scenic course, mostly flat (except for a few rollers in the second half and a bridge), great aid stations and volunteers, spectators were enthusiastic. Cons: The finish area was an absolute mess. Runners were funneled into a small space which made it very difficult to find people you were meeting up with. The bag check was also the worst I have ever seen- my friend had to wait 45 minutes before finally taking it upon herself to get our bag. Fix the small finish area and try to end the course in a large plaza area if possible, and this race could be really awesome. We definitely had a great time though and enjoyed Toronto very much.
4.0

By: Martha B.

Posted: October 17, 2011

99% highly recommended

Great rolling, mostly scenic course with enthusiastic fans in most places. Extremely well organized with one GLARING exception: baggage pick up was a complete and utter disaster. I imagine the organizers will be blasted badly and repeatedly about this and make the appropriate changes for next year. With changes, I'd recommend this race 100%.
4.0

By: Alex M.

Posted: October 17, 2011

It's too bad......

that this race will forever be remembered for the bag check fiasco. While waiting over 60 minutes for my bag, I spoke with many people, not just from out of town but around the world. People who said they would neither recommend nor run this marathon again because of the bag check problem. I'm not new to this game people, but this was definitely the worst bag recovery I have experienced. And to boot, we had to pay $2 for the service. I personally have never paid for a bag check at a marathon (47 and counting). At the end of a marathon, on a cold day, and you can't get at your dry clothes for over an hour. I got my bag faster in both NY and Boston, and they have a few more runners than Toronto. You keep saying you want to run a world class marathon and attract runners from around the world. Well, I hate to break it to you, you just took a HUGE step in the wrong direction. You can build bridges, super highways, and skyscrapers, but if you screw one sheep.... Enough said.
4.0

By: Ryan T.

Posted: October 17, 2011

Not My Favorite Race

The race was ok at best. I felt like there were too many out-and-backs and that began to screw with my head near the end. The last out and back down Queen street in the beaches neighbourhood was a difficult stretch to tackle mentally. Your legs are screaming and its all too tempting to step into the west bound lane and cut the race short. There was nothing terrible about the course i just wouldn't have planned it that way. The worst part was the bag check pick-up. The finishing shoot ends at the bag check which is a closed corral. It was chaos. It took me almost an hour to get my bag and that was after they had let all the marathoners go into the half and 5k line to get things moving quicker. Of and after you get your bag you expected to wade back through the mob it was unbelievable. They also charge you $2.00 if you want to check your bag. I'll probably never run this race again because of this.
3.0

By: Elaine C.

Posted: January 28, 2011

Awesome

I didn't get into the race in my home town, so I decided to visit this marathon and I do not regret my decision. The race is pretty flat and there were some bumps, but nothing was noticeably painful. The crowd was also very good and interactive. It's not the 26.2-mile block party that NY is but still extremely supportive. My only gripe is that I don't run with a watch and use the marathon clocks to guide myself. In the US, every mile is marked. Unfortunately, this race marks only every 5K, which I hadn't expected so it threw me off. Oh well - I still had a great time!
4.0

By: Oriol S.

Posted: October 22, 2010

Excellent organization, great marathon!

I loved to run STWM 2010. Weather was just perfect, many people were cheering all along the course long, and there was great organization overall. Impressive views of the lake and the city downtown. I also enjoyed very much the "friendship run" the day before the marathon, with John Stanton. Great marathon; I truly recommend it!
4.0

By: MANUEL R.

Posted: October 11, 2010

Good marathon

Very good organization.The course isn't as flat as they say it is during the final 10 to 12K. Recommended 100%.
4.0

By: Harry Y.

Posted: October 06, 2010

Don't Think It's Pancake Flat

I wouldn't say this course is pancake flat! Make sure you check out the elevation chart for this course. Starting around mile 20 it seems like it's more uphill than down, and if it's windy, it's kind of brutal!
4.0

By: Sid Busch

Posted: September 28, 2010

Better every year

This was my fourth time running this marathon and it gets better every year. If you're looking for a PR, this is the course to run; just look at the winning time this year and the top finishing times. Great support, fantastic volunteers, and good organization that ranges from packet pick-up to the medal being hung around your neck. Highly recommend this marathon.
5.0

By: Sanjay Mohanta

Posted: September 28, 2010

Can do better

This was the sixth time running this course, my 24th marathon. They didn't have any gels on the course and there weren't many porta-potties at the stations. They could have been doubled. The water stations should have come every 2 K as well. The cost of parking for the race kit pick-up was too high. They should have it at the convention center like last year.
2.0

By: Sid Busch

Posted: October 18, 2009

GREAT NEW COURSE

This was my third Toronto Waterfront Marathon, and the new course was really great. Instead of the barren Thompson Park, you run through an area called the BEACHES, and with all of the people cheering you on before 30K, it really helped. One man even gave out watermelon slices, and they tasted SOOOOO good. There was a problem with the expo buses at the beginning, but that was solved in a timely manner. The expo was great, with plenty of free stuff and great speakers. Really enjoyed the FRIENDSHIP RUN held on Saturday - free food and a nice way to stay loose and meet your fellow runners, and having Joan Benoit Samuelson there wasn't bad either. I really recommend doing this free run. I have run 161 marathons so far, and this one is as good as a lot of the BIGGER ones. Great job. I will be back.
5.0

By: Marina w.

Posted: October 10, 2009

Waterfront was nice

The course for this race was well planned out - pretty flat and scenic along the coast, and then also through some towns where there were plenty of eager folks cheering us on and little festivals (which were unrelated to the race but uplifting nonetheless). The out-and-back portion was also nice, getting to see the faster and slower runners each way! Organization was fairly good for the expo. I appreciated the shuttles that transported us there from the downtown hotel. Pre-race morning organization was lacking! Bag check was particularly terrible - the worst I have seen, and the only one to charge! Double boo! Course organization was fine, but more restrooms in the first miles are needed, as half and full runners were together, making the wait for the potties over five minutes! The post-race area was also ok - we were all kept together and going in the same direction, and there was adequate food: bagels and fruit.
4.0

By: Tom C.

Posted: October 09, 2009

well organized and flat course

The course is as flat as a marathon course can get. The few little "rolls" are hardly noticeable. The expo was ok, and packet pickup was great. The race is pretty crowded at the start since the full and half start at the same time. I ran Toronto hoping for a flat course, a city feel and a good race time - and I got all three. My only negative comment is that, for a "waterfront" marathon, I rarely saw any water.
4.0

By: David Trevino

Posted: October 02, 2009

My 1st Marathon outside the United States

I have read some of the comments that other runners have posted, and I just like to know if there were two marathons on the same day in Toronto. The reason I ask is because I think I may have run in the best of the two. From the time I checked into the hotel, to the point where I checked out to return to the United States, my whole experience with the Toronto Waterfront Marathon was great. The course was flat. Sure, there may have been some bumps here and there, but not all marathon courses are "pancake" flat. The Toronto Marathon came pretty close to being "pancake" flat. It was announced before the race that rain was predicted, but Mother Nature gave us a gift by stopping the rain before the start of the race. Yes, it was humid, but that is not in anyone's control. Running a marathon will bring challenges, but the key to handling these challenges is to come prepared - in other words, do some hill training, and train in warm conditions (you may have to scale back on your pace at the beginning, but like with any training program, you need to slowly build up). As for the $2 dollar charge for checking in baggage, look at the bright side: it went to charity. As mentioned above, I had a great time in Toronto, and even being "humid" I ran a strong race, and finished just a little over three minutes from my PR. This is good since I'm coming off of the heel of a bad hamstring/groin injury. I even earned my Boston qualifier for 2010, but have decided to use it for 2011, which I believe will still be good at that time. The expo was good, and the crowd support was good - I have run in some marathons where there was hardly any crowd support except at the start, or coming in to the finish line. Toronto, I want to thank you for putting on an excellent event. Toronto is a very exciting city, and I found the citizens of Toronto to be friendly. I would highly recommend this race to anyone, and I definitely plan on keeping this on my radar screen for next year. (If not Toronto, then some other city in Canada.)
5.0

By: tiff c.

Posted: September 30, 2009

Not so flat and very humid!

It was very humid (95%), which lead to breathing issues for a lot of the runners I know, myself included. Also, there were several turn-arounds, which were slippery (a friend wiped out, actually). The course was not "pancake" flat as advertised. In some areas, the support was really, really great, and in some areas there was nothing and cars were trying to drive on the course. I won't run the full course at this one again, but I do suggest it if you want to get a good view of Toronto.
3.0

By: Angela A.

Posted: September 30, 2009

Plan carefully...

After having run Chicago and New York, I felt that this race was very well organized, other than the start area. The gear-check line was a mile long, and I didn't know ahead of time that it was $2 to check our bag. When the gun went off at the start, I was still trying to get into my corral with hundreds of others who were bottle-necked, and by the time I crossed the start, there were mostly slower runners that I was constantly fighting to get ahead of. Being from Alberta, I also struggled with the humidity. In addition, my Garmin was completely useless during this race, which threw me off mentally because I have relied on it so much during my training. On the flip side, I loved the race expo and technical shirt, and the course was mostly flat. There were several areas along the course that were out-and-back and we could see runners heading back toward us, including the elites, which is always fun to see. I also loved the part of the course that went through the Beaches. In the future, I would get in the start corral much earlier and not count on my Garmin.
4.0

By: alex a.

Posted: September 29, 2009

Great course but horrible finish line

Everything was great (expo, volunteers, course). However, the finish line was a deal-breaker for me. I have participated in several Canadian Running Series events and I do not understand why they insist on caging runners in like cattle at the finish line for 500 meters. It is gross and claustrophobic being stuck with a pile of stinky runners. Ottawa had more participants and got people out quicker.
4.0

By: John C.

Posted: September 28, 2009

Flat, Well Organized, but Sparse Crowd

This was my first time to run the Waterfront Marathon. As many others have commented, the organization is top-notch. Without a doubt, it was the best expo I have ever been to. Packet pickup is easy and they funnel you right through and into the vendors. Packet premiums were also good. The medal is also one of the best I've received. I had some problems finding my corral, since I'm not from Toronto and did not know where the "entrance from Nathan Philips Square" was, which they kept telling me to try and find. Overall, it was a fantastic race with a flat course that lent itself to a new personal best. There are definitely some drawbacks, however. If you like running with your Garmin, forget it. You'll spend the first 3 or 4 miles under a freeway and your Garmin will get lost. It actually underestimated my total distance by nearly a mile. The course itself is sparsely populated with spectators, but the ones there are loud and fun! Enjoyable event! If you want a new personal best, this is a great place to go. I recommend staying downtown, as the race start/finish is about a block from every major hotel.
4.0

By: Brian Groot

Posted: January 05, 2009

One of the best in Canada

This race is extremely well organized and has a very flat course. You get a little bit of everything from the downtown, the waterfront and some more secluded areas. The weather is usually pretty good. Big elite crowd and great cheering sections and fan support. Some parts of the course are a bit hard to get to for fans but the other areas make up for it. Highly recommend this race for a fast time in a big Canadian race.
4.0

By: Peter M.

Posted: November 26, 2008

Fast if not very scenic... great organization

This was my first marathon after having run the half here twice. New start/finish location is better than in the past, but the city has to do something about the potholes. Plus, it was a long walk from the finish line around the City Hall - the whole area was cordoned off. The race was very well organized, with flawless packet pickup, well-staffed water stations, good traffic control and enthusiastic volunteers. The course itself is almost perfectly flat and fast - if not very scenic, especially the second half through Portland's industrial wasteland. Weather can be a little warm in late September, and it was very humid this year, which did not help my performance. But overall, a satisfactory experience.
4.0

By: Sid Busch

Posted: October 29, 2008

GREAT WAY TO SEE TORONTO

This was my second Toronto Waterfront Marathon, and the new start finish area was really nice, with a lot more room for us. The course is flat, and you get a great view of Toronto, as well as the lead runners heading back. The volunteers are fantastic, and there is plenty of aid along the course. The new finisher's medal is a nice one; I wore it with pride back to the States.
5.0

By: Kenny B.

Posted: October 28, 2008

A flat course, with its ups and downs

Pros *Start and finish is very convenient to downtown, especially if you stay at the host hotel. *Relatively flat course, though there are some long, shallow inclines. *Excellent expo. *One of the best tech shirts. *Name on bib is always a nice touch; it helped with spectators (few) calling out my name. *Weather was very good (though a little windy and warm the last 10K). *Great finisher's medal. *Coming from the US, Toronto was a great place to visit. Plenty to do. Less then 2 hours to the Falls. Cons -Few spectators (but those that where there called out your name often). -Some spots on the course were boring. Not much water to look at. Waterfront was really never in front of you. Maybe "waterbeyond." -I would have preferred a few more water stations especially during the middle miles 13-18. -It was hard to find family at the finish area, as they blockaded it so family could not get to you. Overall, I had a great time and would do this marathon again.
4.0

By: Jasvinder B.

Posted: October 09, 2008

Enjoyable marathon on a flat course

Overall, the course was very flat. It took in a lot of the waterfront area. The start and finish was in a good location in central Toronto, and it was easy to get to. The expo was pretty good and packet collection was easy. If you want a marathon with good organization, easy packet pickup and a flat course, then I'd recommend this one.
3.0

By: Marc N.

Posted: October 08, 2008

Great Race... Well Organized... Fun Weekend

This was my 9th marathon, and my first time running Toronto. I was so impressed with the organization, numerous water stations and awesome volunteers. This was a great race. The course is nothing spectacular, but the cheering stations and friendly volunteers make up for it. The expo was a little light on booths, but that's not why i run a race. I would highly recommend this marathon, especially for a destination marathon. Toronto is such a great city; throw in a great marathon, and you have an amazing, memorable weekend. DO IT!
4.0

By: Harvey Lee

Posted: October 05, 2008

Well organized, fast course

This was my 3rd marathon (Chicago and Portland were the others) and I chose Toronto Waterfront because of the date (October/November marathons force you to do morning training runs in the dark with unpredictable weather in Colorado), the flat course, and the attractive destination of Toronto. Overall, I was thrilled with my performance (3:59:30, shaving 23 minutes off of my PR) and the organization of the course. The weather seems consistently good for this race. Be sure to turn on your GPS watch before you get into the corral, otherwise you will have difficulty locking up due to being between some tall buildings. Also, the race is run on streets that do have some sharp crowns and potholes. In particular, the stretch between 20K and 25K is run in a single right lane of traffic. The irregular slope led to cramping in my legs at the end of the race. On the good side, there were plenty of aid stations with water and Gatorade. I understand the other reviewer's comment that there were too many. I chose to stop at each one, but this is a personal choice, and you can skip a few if you want. The aid stations are fairly accurately marked on the course map so you can plan ahead. The final turn on Bay Street leaves you about a kilometer left, with the old City Hall in sight. It's a great visual to reel in, and the crowds were very supportive at the finish. Go for the optional massage. It was only a 10-minute wait, as long as you pre-pay. The post-race spread includes only water, Gatorade, bananas, and bagels, so stuff some extra snacks into your checked bag if you need more than that. Lines for port-o-lets were never bad. Pace groups are plentiful and well marked. There were some good speakers at the pre-race expo. Thank you, Toronto, for a great experience.
4.0

By: John B.

Posted: October 03, 2008

Best of the Toronto Marathons

This was my first Waterfront Marathon and this is far and away the better of Toronto's two marathons (foolishly held a few weeks apart). The course was great and organization was excellent. The expo was one of the better ones I have been to. I ran the half and there were plenty of spectators cheering us on (unlike the hostility directed at us from people in the other Toronto marathon). Although this was not as big or intense as Ottawa, this is definitely number two for Canadian marathons.
5.0

By: Keith L.

Posted: October 03, 2008

Fun city; well-organized race

This was my third marathon, and I came all the way from Florida because I heard great things about Toronto and the race. They had lots of water stations and a great first 15 miles, but I thought the last 10 were not as great with scenery and crowd support. Overall, a very positive experience!
4.0

By: Michael S.

Posted: October 02, 2008

Well organized, flat course

Toronto's Waterfront Marathon is well organized and has a nice expo. Good start organization with well marked corrals. The course is quite flat and scenic, with well marked kilometers. Water and Gatorade stations were plentiful. The crowd support was minimal, but those who showed up were quite supportive. The race includes a half-marathon with more then twice as many runners as the full marathon. Putting your first name on the race bib was a nice feature, but the nicest features of all were the shiny, heavy, gold medal at the finish and the great massages available to runners who signed up in advance.
4.0

By: Sanjay M.

Posted: September 30, 2008

Better organization needed

This was my 15th marathon. I thought they had too many water stations from 20K to 30K. I also had a beef with them telling me at 40K there would be no more water stations - and then finding one at 41K! Great volunteers and the bands were fun. More spectators would be nice. - Sanjay
3.0

By: Raphael W.

Posted: September 29, 2008

Flat and Fun

Very well organized, down to the details of having enough toilets, enough food at the end, etc.... Very flat course, nice view of the lake most of the time, including a six-mile stretch through a park surrounded by the lake on three sides. Great finish line, but not many spectators along the route. Overall, very good. But I don't have much experience.
4.0

By: James C.

Posted: September 19, 2008

Nice city, nice run!!

This race normally has nice weather. Well organized, and I love the website and the newsletters with all the updates. The course is nice, although they seem to change it often. The course volunteers are more than great, but not many spectators in between. The worst part was between miles 20-24, running under the Gardiner Expressway with few runners and fewer spectators. The last couple of miles were good.
4.0

By: mark w.

Posted: February 11, 2008

Seems always to have good weather for running

Have run Scotia twice and both times the weather has been excellent. Good weather and a fast course. What is there to complain about?!?! There is a good quality running expo, and a real attempt by the organizers to make this first-class. The record for the fastest marathon on Canadian soil was set in 2007 - proof of this effort. Also, the effort to put it live on CBC Country Canada and on the internet was a good idea. There are good groupings of people along the way (in the neighborhood cheering sections where mini-parties are going on) mixed with long stretches of loneliness (just you and the other runners). The mass start with the half marathoners make for a crowded first 5K, but the road widens to make the running masses less of an issue after that. Great to see the lead runners at several spots along the way as the course loops back (boy, are they fast and quiet). Next year there is a slight course change. The start and finish will be at Nathan Phillips Square (city hall by the Eaton Centre), which will mean more room at the start and finish line... but also a bit more of an incline on the final stretch (still not as far north as the finish for the Toronto Marathon later in October). All in all, a good marathon... working to be better.
4.0

By: julia t.

Posted: October 18, 2007

Could be more entertaining

I came to this race with high hopes, having heard there would be bands on the course and other entertainment. I was also lured by the idea of running by the water in a beautiful waterside city. Well, toronto is indeed a beautiful city but I was a touch disappointed with the lack of musical support along the way. As I ran by most of the bands seemed to be taking a break, the Cossack dancers were taking a break, and even the cheerleaders were not very active. I would say I was running in the densest part of the field at 4 hours to 4.30 pace. The route does follow the water quite bit but the only really special part is between kms 28 to 31 when you are out on the promontory in the national park area. The rest of the time you are on wide roads and not all that close to the water.
3.0

By: Jim Daigneau

Posted: October 17, 2007

Great race course, flat and enjoyable!

Toronto is my hometown so really looked forward to having the opportunity to return east and run on familiar turf on a flat, scenic race course. Course along the Toronto waterfront heading west to Humber Bay and back east along the Lakeshore to the Beaches area did not disappoint AND weather was awesome (sunny & warm). My only criticism is that for a 'big city' race the race medals were kind of disappointing this year compared to those I've received at other marathons such as Chicago Lasalle, Napa Valley and Seattle/ Bellevue Seafair races. Even Queen City race in Regina, SK last year offered a nicer finishers medal (go figure?). Kudos to the organizers for a quality, flat and fast race course and the enthusiasm of the volunteers along the race course. Enjoyed my experience in the GTA/ TO! Hope to be back soon :)
5.0

By: Jim Yanaway

Posted: October 12, 2007

Well-run marathon

This was my first Canadian marathon. The organizers did a great job from the expo, to the race, to the post-race party. Unlike this year's Chicago Marathon there were plenty of water and Gatorade at all of the stops. The enthusiastic volunteers made it easier to run the final miles. The post-race party at Milestones was enjoyable. The winner of the marathon, John Kelai, was so friendly and gladly signed autographs and posed for pictures.
5.0

By: Susan M.

Posted: October 24, 2006

Nice, flat course for a first marathon

I enjoyed my first-marathon experience and I think that it is in part because of this race. It was a nice, flat course (a little boring but at least there were no hills) and the volunteers were terrific. The race and race expo were well organized. Overall it was a great experience.
5.0

By: Donna W.

Posted: October 07, 2006

Well organized race and nice place to visit

This was my 4th marathon. I was looking forward to visiting Toronto. I was not disappointed. Being from the US, I appreciated the mile markers, but I so wish the US would go metric! The course was interesting and I enjoyed every mile. The expo was great and I really enjoyed hearing John Bingham speak at the expo and the pasta dinner, although the food was quite disappointing. We stayed at the race host hotel and there were many casual dining restaurants in the immediate vicinity. The entire experience was memorable. The size of the full 'thon is moderate, along the lines of Rocket City or Portland, ME. I'd do it again, but there are so many I haven't run yet, so I don't know if I'll get back to this one or not.
4.0

By: david g.

Posted: October 05, 2006

Still One Of My Favorite Races

This was my sixth consecutive year running the half marathon here. The organization is still very smooth and professional. The weather in September in Toronto is quite reliable. The course is flat and fast. Personally I feel the only drawback of this race is that the course is not hideous, but it certainly doesn't show off Toronto's best features. All in all, if you were thinking of visiting Toronto for a race weekend, I believe this is the best one to choose.
4.0

By: Chuck Ard

Posted: September 30, 2006

Lots O' Fun!

Very well organized. Nice course. Roads are closed to traffic. Plenty of room. Aid stations were well manned and very enthusiastic! Even the weather held out. Toronto should be proud of this race. I just wish that I had been in better shape.
5.0

By: Patricia K.

Posted: September 30, 2006

Great marathon! I'll run it again!

The Toronto Waterfront Marathon was very organized and well run. The race director was friendly and went out of his way to chat with runners at the Friendship Run on Saturday morning. Although they are both relatively small, you don't want to miss the Friendship Run or the expo. Very friendly and helpful experts and volunteers make you feel confident and ready to run! The penguin and Coach Jenny were inspirational in their presentations at the expo. The race t-shirts were top-notch and of great quality, and I loved the personalized race numbers and the Team USA runners bracelets. The pace bunnies were easy to locate and really seemed motivated to help us all meet our time goals. The neighborhood challenges had good music and entertainment as you ran by. Even the course photographers were cheering us on! The water stations and neighborhood areas were uplifting, but the rest of the course lacked spectators, if that's important to you. I loved the course, and the out-and-back loops gave me many opportunites to watch some amazing elite athletes race by. The Toronto Waterfront Marathon delivered everything promised and more. Super race for half-marathoners and marathoners. Congratulations to the race director and all the volunteers for a fabulous, well-organized race.
4.0

By: Marco W.

Posted: September 27, 2006

Worthwhile if you want to visit Toronto

After being sorely disappointed with the Toronto Marathon (our city's *other* race), I was holding my breath to see how this event compared. What a difference and what an enjoyable experience. The course was well thought out and keeps runners tight to the waterfront and on mainly closed roads. Water stations and port-o-potties were frequent (and they even had toilet paper halfway through the race...); the volunteers were plentiful; the logistics were smooth; and the start/finish is easy to get to, in an area with plenty of immediate parking in the area and easy subway access. The course is open, flat and fast. Some parts of it are out of the way, but all things considered, it is as well thought out and "runner-focused" as one could hope for within the context of trying to close off 26 miles within a major city. The finish line was well organized. I was also very impressed by how smooth and painless the entire event was to particpate in - no bumps or letdowns. If you want to run a marathon in Toronto, this is the one....
4.0

By: Philip K.

Posted: September 26, 2006

Cool race

It was a very good day for a half marathon. Weather was cool but not too cool and as the day warmed up, not too warm. Ran a surprisingly fast time considering my other race timings of similar distance. Volunteers and spectators were a blast, especially since we had personalized bibs.
5.0

By: william carter

Posted: September 26, 2006

Great job, Toronto!

I must admit that I ran this marathon last year and gave it a mediocre review. I give a lot of credit to the organizers because they listened to the feedback and made GREAT changes. The course was much improved, the neighborhood challenges provided more spectators, and the overall organization was better. I even traveled to Toronto from Detroit and chose to skip my hometown race to give Toronto another chance. Glad I did. This marathon will continue to grow because these race organizers care and know what they are doing. Thanks and see you next year.
4.0

By: Brian J.

Posted: September 26, 2006

Great race!

This was my first marathon. Great organization and beautiful course. Majority of the race is on the lake. Very scenic. You should try this one at least once. I will do this one again.
4.0

By: Robert M.

Posted: September 25, 2006

Very flat course

I just ran the 2006 Toronto Waterfront Marathon. The course is very flat with a couple of very small hills. There are lots of aid stations and some good entertainment at various points along the course. Long stretches of the course have no fan support due to there being no nearby residential areas, but where the fans were they were very vocal and support. The three different out-and-backs get a little boring, but overall the scenery is pleasant (except for the little stretch through an industrial area). Lots of fluids and Mylar blankets at the finish line. I was very disappointed by choice of a bagel, apple or banana for food at the end of the race. With a name like Scotiabank sponsoring the race in a big city like Toronto, I expected a much better selection. Overall I would recommend this race if you are looking to set a PB.
4.0

By: Steve K.

Posted: September 24, 2006

A GREAT DAY

A great day for a marathon. The rain never materialized and the conditions (a bit of wind) were great for running. I liked the course changes, and the organization was great. It was fun having everyone at the same start.... Volunteers were awesome - very encouraging and enthusiastic. See you next year.
4.0

By: Jean K.

Posted: October 22, 2005

Extremely well organized

Having an earlier start option was great; we were able to avoid the heat (although it turned out to be not that bad). Lots of water and Gatorade, well supported drink stations, added bonus of offers of power gels (many marathons don't provide these). The bands were fantastic, especially the drum band under the highway. Even the final photo captured all 3 of us together, which is what we had hoped for. In past marathons, my running partner and I have been 'spliced' even though we joined our hands and raised them as we crossed the line. Thank you for a fun experience!
4.0

By: Jon A.

Posted: October 11, 2005

Very Good!

I really enjoyed this marathon. It was my first, and I think it is a great first marathon. My ONLY negative comment is that I trained in miles, and the course is marked only in KM. If you are coming from miles make sure you know your splits/times in KM!!!!!! That messed up everyone in my group.
4.0

By: penny moreton

Posted: October 11, 2005

My first marathon across the Atlantic - a blast

I helped organize a trip to this marathon after meeting with the race director, Alan Brookes, at the London Marathon expo. As a result, seven of us from Ulverston and the Hoad Hill Harriers club came across the Atlantic for the first time. The flight/hotel package was exceptional, not only for price, but also for quality; it certainly made our stay very enjoyable. The race was very well organized, being a veteran of 13 marathons now; entry was easy, race instructions very clear on the net, the organization of being met and taken to the race start and baggage area was slick, and the race expo was efficient in its registration procedures. The only concern I had was the technical t-shirt available for the women was amazingly small, even in the large size, and I felt not of the same durable quality of the men's. Race-day was hot and the availability of refreshments was more than adequate and plentiful. The snacks at the end helped immediate refuelling. The presentations were great; never had the chance to see the awarding of prizes before. (I must be running faster.) So thank you Alan, Jenny and John Bingham for making us all so very welcome and I hope we shall return very soon to Canada; we were very impressed with its friendliness, politeness, cleanliness and liberal way of life.
4.0

By: Shannon H.

Posted: October 06, 2005

Great organizastion

I really liked running the course in the city. However, the middle seemed to drag. Running along the water and back into the city was a little boring. All in all, it was a great first marathon and I really thought it was well organized. I could not find a pace runner for 3:40 so I ran with the 3:30 pace group.
4.0

By: DIANE D.

Posted: October 05, 2005

PERSONALIZED BIB NUMBER

The personalized bib number made a huge difference. The crowd and other runners were encouraging us by calling our own name...that was GREAT! It gave me more energy and in the last kilometers it made me smile; I just loved it! Everyone was pleased with it; I hope that other races will use it as well.
4.0

By: margot s.

Posted: October 04, 2005

A safe bet; a city worth visiting

Raucous, well-funded, and rather outré - this was my initial impression of the STWM from their website and printed collateral. I mean, if you see a rather butch, tattooed lady waving her arms at you every time you surf into the website, and you know the marathon is being sponsored by the Bank of Nova Scotia, and the website design is the visual equivalent of Times Square - well, you assume the race is going to be out of the ordinary, right? Anyway, I did, but I was wrong. It was a humdrum affair on a duller-than-dirt course. Nearly a third of the route was an out-and-back along a marshy spit of land far, far from the hubbub of downtown Toronto. And by the way, there is no hubbub in downtown Toronto, not on a Sunday anyway. The pasta dinner, at C$25, was simply a ripoff. I signed up for the first seating (4:30) but in the end there was no first seating; or rather, the 4:30 seating became allocated to the Team in Training diners (who from the looks of 'em like to eat early and often). I got squeezed in with the 6:00 pm crowd, and had to stand in line for 35 minutes. Long before I got to the steam table, most of the other diners had already finished and were hanging around to listen to the guest speaker, John 'The Penguin' Bingham. The kitchen kept running out of pasta and salads, stopping the queue for another ten minutes while they cooked up some more. Fortunately, by the time I got my food a few of the diners got tired of waiting for the speaker, and cleared out... meaning there was at last a place for me to sit. The pasta was excellent; too bad I was unable to get a second helping. One can't complain about Torontonians, though: nice, unpretentious and helpful people, if a trifle over-surprised to learn that there is a marathon going on (can you imagine this in London or New York?). Just like Ottawans, only there are more of 'em and they have a subway that scoots you around in a jiff. I knocked a very few minutes off my last marathon time (Ottawa, May '05), but Ottawa was much better.
4.0

By: Susan M.

Posted: October 04, 2005

No people or crowd support

Not exactly as advertised! Toronto is a great city and I love it but will not run this one again. Ugly out-and-back course with most of it in a barren part of the city. The only people were at the water stations and some of the promised cheering stations didn't even exist. Surely, Toronto has more to offer the marathoner than this loop course.
2.0

By: Rob P.

Posted: October 03, 2005

A fantastic race in every way!

I went with the early-bird start at 6:15 a.m. Course support was great even that early. Early registrants had their first names printed on their race bibs, so fans called out your name as you passed. That was really special. The only complaint would be drab, limited food at the end of the race. They were out of bananas when I got done.
5.0

By: Cynthia P.

Posted: October 03, 2005

First marathon, helped a charity... win-win (PTL)!

This was my first-ever marathon! I set the goal after I began running just two years ago. When I began, I couldn't run on the treadmill for longer than 2 minutes without stopping to 'recover.' Over time, and with some encouragement along the way, I increased my endurance.... Ran a 10K in May '04 to start and then my first half-marathon in May '05. It was a challenge to maintain training over the summer with temperatures well over 30C. But I persevered, knowing that I wanted to achieve the goal of running a marathon in my 50th year. (This even after I developed plantar fasciitis on my last long run three weeks before the race date.) By God's grace, I was in good form on race day. Although I had to stop running, I kept up my fitness level by cross-training and entrusted the results to Him. How exhilarating to accomplish my goal by completing the course on September 25! I was even able to help a charity along the way! PTL!
4.0

By: Kieran o.

Posted: September 29, 2005

Very enjoyable, but not quite as described!

I picked this marathon to be my first for a couple of reasons; partly its proximity to western NY, but mostly because it was described as a scenic, flat course with great spectators. The route was very boring and lonely in places, especially on the Leslie Spit (6 or so barren miles of scrub and no spectators). However, the people that did come out in support made up for it and the bands (mostly percussion) certainly gave me a lift. Overall, organization was great, including lots of friendly volunteers, adequate water & Gatorade stops, and visible markers every 2k or so (but no times except at the half). Gel stations were sometimes a little harder to spot. I think some changes in the routing of the course, would be a great improvement. That said, I had such a great experience, I'd do it again.
3.0

By: John S.

Posted: September 28, 2005

Great idea to have first names on bibs

I just ran the marathon for the second consecutive year. I enjoyed it more this time around (knowing the course from the previous year helped). There are really 2 slight inclines; otherwise it is flat. I was a little disappointed with the KM markers (hard to find or missing) and as one runner pointed out... it's called the Waterfront Marathon, yet you don't run along the water! Great idea to have names on bibs. It was very encouraging to have people cheer you on using your first name, especially when you are struggling! Water and Gatorade stations were plentiful and I had a great time in Toronto. Will be back.
4.0

By: Richard C.

Posted: September 27, 2005

Flat and fun.

My wife and I plan our vacations around roughly four marathons per year. We get to see new parts of North America and the world and get some running in. My point is, our feelings about a marathon are based upon our overall experience. In our case, we had a blast. We arrived Thursday and the weather couldn't be better. It stayed temperate until Sunday, race day, when it got cloudy and grey, which we like for running. I have no complaints about the organization or the course. The spectators were a bit sparse, but that's what Boston and Chicago are for. I'm not sure what the the previous comment was complaining about. I saw all km markers, and had a medal at the end. Maybe the half was a bit disorganized because they had many more runners. I have mixed feelings about out-and-back courses, but at least you get to see other runners, including the elites. All in all, it was pretty much as advertised: a mid-sized, big-city marathon. Mostly, we loved Toronto and would happily go back there (great food!). It's like New York, without the trash!
3.0

By: Don K.

Posted: September 27, 2005

Toronto Waterfront and Industrial Marathon

The organizers and organization were first-rate and helpful, as were the more-than-sufficient number of volunteers. All made the day fun, and logistically easy, which is all greatly appreciated. If I lived in the area, I'd be back. However, from 800km (500 miles), to choose the T. Waterfront on the strength of the words 'waterfront,' 'scenic,' etc., is a mistake. If you prioritize scenery when selecting a long-trip marathon, the route for the runners is less than extraordinary. Despite the delightful nature of the city, the running route's scenery was a disappointment. Sections early were fine, but they were not more than half of the day. About 4 good miles were in town among the finer buildings, and about 6 to 8 of the expected and delightful pretty miles along the picturesque western side of Toronto's waterfront park area were very pleasing. But the second half of the course on the east side was among industrial plants and railroad tracks, or under an elevated expressway, or on a peninsula that needs an infusion of care and clean-up to become as beautiful as it could easily be. Nothing against anyone involved at all; all folks connected to the race were wonderful to us. But to invest the traveling money and time, there are prettier courses.
3.0

By: Erik G.

Posted: September 27, 2005

Flat and well organized.

Course is very flat and the people are great. Lots of encouraging cheering and many bands and drummers. I could have used power gets at the 22km mark. Weather was perfect and there was lots of water and Gatorade.
4.0

By: david g.

Posted: September 27, 2005

fifth year in a row...

2005 marked the fifth straight year that I have run the half marathon here. The primary draws are the timing (it fits very well into a fall marathon training schedule) and the very flat course. The organization is quite smooth and the aid stations are abundant and well-staffed. The only drawbacks are the low spectator turnout and less-than-beautiful scenery. This is not a destination marathon, but it is an excellent opportunity for seasoned runners to chase a PB. I don't know where the narrow course comments come from. (???)
3.0

By: Keith Archer

Posted: September 27, 2005

No-Hassle and Pleasant entry into Marathon Running

I enjoyed my first marathon. The weather was perfect (overcast), the volunteers were friendly, the aid stations were plentiful, I received a medal at the end, and there were absolutely no problems on the route. It is unfortunate that the Leslie Spit is so isolated - but the great support from the Beaches area made up for it a little. I think it would be more fun to run further west along the Lakeshore than run the Leslie Spit. Especially with the fan support that would then be available during the second half of the race. Suggestions for next year would be to mark the bunnies better, and provide written directions during the kit pickup and race starts. Thanks for a very well organized and fun run. ps. Nice meeting you, Roger.
4.0

By: Bill c.

Posted: September 27, 2005

The worst I've run

I've run a number of marathons in a lot of different cities and this was by far the worst. The course was plain at best. We ran down a freeway with basically no view of the water. The course than came back down the same stretch of freeway to a sharp right out on a boring, brushy island. Finally, we ran under a bunch of overpasses until we ended up at the finish. The course was also point-to-point with sharp 180 turns. Horrible. No food at the finish and no space blankets. A really long finisher's chute with no support staff. My wife couldn't even be at the finish and get to me at the end of the chute. One last issue was that the 3:20 pacer did not show up. We ended up with a rather bitter 3:10 pace guy who took us out doing sub 7:05's. Oh well. The whole experience stunk and I would recommend everyone stay away from this unattractive, poorly run marathon. Spend your money, training, and time on Cincinnati, Chicago, New York, Detroit, etc. Love Toronto; just hate their marathon.
1.0

By: Steve H.

Posted: September 25, 2005

Very dissapointing

After reading the official website and comments here about the race, my wife and I decided to run the half in 2005. We found the course very poorly marked. We could only spot about 5 or 6 of the km markers. The course was also much too narrow for the number of runners. The only water on the waterfront marathon course was at least a hundred yards away from the road. We were closer to the highway than the water. There were VERY few spectators lining the course and no space blankets at the end despite a cool rain falling. We found the event OK, but nothing special.
2.0

By: Patricia Hildebrand

Posted: December 27, 2004

Great experience for my first full marathon!

I had only run a 5K and 1/2 marathon before this. I trained well and enjoy the marathon distance. The organization was great, lots of volunteers and very helpful. The port-o-pots were supplied and ample. Power gels were given on first water stop and then not until after the halfway mark which was frustrating. Gatorade was also lacking during the middle of the run. Scenery was beautiful and the course is very flat. Great experience in all. I under ran my first, but going over the finish line I said to myself 'I can do that again.' I was advised by a vetran triathloner on the way to the race to drink chocolate milk before and after the race in order to cut recovery time. It worked exactly as he said. (If you read this, thanks!) Also they had great timing devices - mats at start, 21KM and finish and you had to cross all three. This is a Boston qualifier. I would recommend this race to anyone who wants to do a marathon - especially for a 1st marathon.
4.0

By: Pete L.

Posted: October 23, 2004

Course - terrific! Volunteers - wonderful!!!

I really enjoyed the whole Waterfront Marathon experience. The race was well organized; I felt really comfortable with the start, the finish, the expo and support on the course - volunteers, bands, aid, fluids, signage and controls. I want to come back next year.
5.0

By: Alan C.

Posted: October 13, 2004

A Marathon for a lifetime

A great course held at the perfect time of year. I will make sure to run this marathon every year.
4.0

By: mike w.

Posted: October 05, 2004

This marathon rocks

Toronto and it's people represent the best in Great Lakes cities. The marathon was challenging, scenic and well-managed - fans were numerous and supportive and genuine.
5.0

By: Lynn A.

Posted: October 01, 2004

A very 'positive', uplifting experience!!

I have completed 2 full marathons before in 1987 and 1988. I turned 53 this summer. Only 3 weeks prior to this marathon, I decided to try to run it - 17 years since my last one. Needless to say I did not have time to train for this marathon. I do run on a regular basis and do step aerobics. My goal for the other 2 marathons was to do it without stopping and I did in 4:20 and 4:10 respectively. This one my goal was just to finish it and hopefully (because of no training) do it under 5:00. I ran for 2 1/2 hours - then walked for 1/2 min periodically. I finished it in 5:11. I could have done it in less time if I had pushed myself harder but I'm proud that I even finished it. If there is such a thing as enjoying a marathon - I truly did enjoy it. It was a very 'positive', uplifting experience and I look forward to doing another one (and hopefully finish in less time). Thank you.
5.0

By: Renee Burns

Posted: October 01, 2004

We ran a fast pace, in this one great race!

My partner and I are from Australia and entered this race whist over in Canada...it was our first race and we completed it way ahead of what we thought we would run. The atmosphere was great and the course was very flat and fast. I would recommend this course to any first timer.
5.0

By: Nuno Barradas

Posted: October 01, 2004

Absolutely fabulous

I have been in several marathons all around the world. Without the dimension of a big international marathon this event has the energy and charisma to match them all. Thanks to the organizers for a fantastic day. Thanks to the people of Toronto for the warm hospitality. Thanks to all the runners and walkers because their energy carried me through all the way nice and smooth. See you again next year.
5.0

By: Amelia S.

Posted: October 01, 2004

FAST... BEAUTIFUL... A NOT TO BE MISSED MARATHON

Although I didn't run a personal best, this marathon was by far one of the best I've ever entered. The weather of course helped, but one of the things I loved most was the new route that took us closer to the water. And of course the spectators, especially the ones at the 33k mark; there was a group of 4-5 people and just as I passed them they looked right at me and cheered me on as if they knew me... I was so tired at this point... just that bit of encouragement meant so much. I will definitely be back in the years to come. -Amelia
5.0

By: Dave R.

Posted: September 30, 2004

Such a great day, tons of volunteer support.

There was so much support and cheering all alone the route. Especially the beaches between mile 20-23 where we all know the cheering is needed. The volunteers worked their tails off, and made sure every runner had all that they needed. My only wish is there were more shade on the route, but that is not up to the race organizers.
5.0

By: Eric W.

Posted: September 30, 2004

Nice, but could be improved...

Well, compared to Chicago it is tiny, but it was a nice race to run. It is flat. The main drawback is that your family has a hard time seeing you more than once or twice during the race. It was well organized and I liked seeing the lake so much.
4.0

By: Duff McLaren

Posted: September 30, 2004

WOW

Liked the reversed route, it made the 'spit' seem shorter. Allan Brooks, thank you for keeping running in Toronto. Without you, it wouldn't be the same. You are great at what you do. The running community is a better place because of your committment.
5.0

By: Beth H.

Posted: September 29, 2004

A fabulous, flat, scenic, and well-organized race!

This was the perfect venue for a first marathon. Everything was well-organized and efficient, from the expo through to the race finish. The route was beautiful and those neighborhood cheering sections and musicians really made me remember why I love Toronto! The race shirt and the medal are also fantastic.
4.0

By: Monica B.

Posted: September 29, 2004

What an amazing experience!!

The early bird start is fantastic for those of us that are running over 5 hours...such an awesome feeling to have so many cheering at the finish line...that otherwise wouldn't have been there.
4.0

By: Janice M.

Posted: September 29, 2004

I'll be back!!!

Better than I imagined in my wildest dreams! I've only been running for a few months so I was worried a half marathon might be too ambitious - but this was FUN from start to finish!!! I'm still on a runner's high and planning my next race. Thanks to all the organizers and volunteers for a job well done.
5.0

By: Alain Boude

Posted: September 29, 2004

perfect time of the year & very good organization

I wanted to qualify for the Boston Marathon and I chose Toronto to do so for several reasons. First of all, I know the town very well (I lived there 10 years and my mother still lives in Toronto). Secondly, the course is nice and you have a chance to see yours friends who are not running at your pace as you cross them along the course. Thirdly, the water stations were ideally placed along the course. On top of that, we could get gel starting at the 10km mark even though it was not mentioned on the web site and that was a great relief for all the runners in our group, as it means that you do not have to carry food with you. We were very fortunate with the weather, the public is always cheering and the bands are good. You get all the food and water you want when you finish and all the volunteers are very helpful. The Adidas running shirt as well as the medal have a great design. I usually do not run a marathon twice but I could redo this one with great pleasure, and as I missed my qualification for the Boston Marathon by 5 minutes, I will probably get the chance to try again with Toronto.
5.0

By: Frank S.

Posted: September 29, 2004

Splendid Day - Perfect Conditions

Extremely well organized. It was exciting to be a part of it. Runners were treated very well and with lots of respect.
4.0

By: Ian A.

Posted: September 29, 2004

Great Course! Great Potential!

Ran the half marathon. The start was quite congested as compared with the only other event of similar size I've run. (2004 Miami Tropical Marathon/Half Marathon) Interestingly, Miami started everyone together and yet had less congestion. It took forever to get going in the half and just when the course opened up a bit runners started encountering (early start) walkers who had the effect of slowing things down again. I'm of the opinion that a grouped start is more runner-friendly as it allows pace to be the ultimate determiner of how the field 'opens up' though, it's perhaps harder on marshals and has the potential of having slower competitors on the course at the hottest part of the day. Once we got going the (1/2) course was great! Very fast and under textbook weather conditions. There were lots of aid stations, however the volunteers could have benefited from some training regarding proper ways to hand runners liquids (lots of dropped cups and resulting slowdowns). The volunteers themselves were great! Cheerful, very encouraging and good natured. We love and appreciate you all! No volunteers/no races... I'm sure I speak for all runners and walkers when I give you a heartfelt thanks! The spectators were wonderful as well. From what I've read some of the 25K+ events have huge spectator involvement but, in the context of the event's size, crowd support was great! Aid stations were compromised via congestion from slower early start runners and walkers. After finishing the half I waited for a friend who was running the full marathon. Bottled water at the finish ran out at about 3:50 or so... Water & Gatorade in glasses was available, however, reasonably close to the finish line. At my suggestion, volunteers were posted at the finish line to direct people to the water tables. I've never run a full marathon but I know a considerable number of folks who have and I've been at the finish line of more than one. In my experience the 3:30-4:45 or so guys are where you're going to find the real 'road kill'. I have huge amount of respect for these folks, many of whom have had to dig very deep to achieve their finish/finish times and who've run for twice the time of the high level elites and worked every bit as hard. Their faces tell the story... They are tired and thirsty almost without exception. Don't make them wait for water. I spent my time while waiting for my friend carrying water in glasses to the finish line. After 26.2 miles the 50-100' to the water tables is a long trip... I travelled to Toronto specifically to run and it was well worth it! I didn't see any any issues that couldn't be addressed. Next stop for me is my first marathon in January. If I revisit Toronto next year it'll be for the marathon. Great event! A little polishing of the gem and it'd be perfect! Huge praise for the performances and inspiration of Mr. Whitlock and Mr. Singh. The world needs such heroes!
4.0

By: Kyle B.

Posted: September 29, 2004

Very enjoyable

As indicated in my rating, I thought the spectators were awesome. I wish there had been more of them on the Leslie Street Spit, as I found that to be the most challenging leg of the course. Hot, and kind of boring. The rest of the course was fabulous. I was of course disappointed that I didn't get my medal crossing the finish line, but I understand your challenge, when so many people signed up shortly before the race. The increase in numbers indicates the positive feedback runners have heard about last years race. Congratulations on a job well done!!
4.0

By: Judy V.

Posted: September 28, 2004

What an awesome experience!

This was my first 1/2 marathon and what a great experience. The course was relatively flat which was heaven. What a treat to have the live bands out on the course with some really upbeat music to keep us motivated. There was lots of food and water at the end. Overall, a well-run, fun race. Thanks.
4.0

By: Albenie Losier

Posted: September 28, 2004

super flat course

I was very impressed by the scenic, traffic-free route, the bands, and all the spectators cheering at the runners. I came from a small French village in N.B. And running in Toronto was a tremendous thrill.
5.0

By: Jean-Paul Bedard

Posted: September 28, 2004

If speed is your goal....this IS it!

This was my third Waterfront Marathon and as usual, the organization was superb. The flat, traffic-free course allowed me to go all-out. I finally broke the 3 hour barrier and now I can set sail for Boston again!
4.0

By: Steve D.

Posted: September 28, 2004

Awesome choice for my first major event!

I must say that I enjoyed the event itself and although it was a little hot near the finishing time, I loved it! This was my first half-marathon and I now have definitely got the bug. My plan for next year is to complete the marathon. This is quite amazing to my family, since I was only running 5km runs in March of this year. I entered three races this summer and gradually built up to the half. The course was great for a beginner like me since it was fairly flat and had awesome spectator support. The website was a very good tool to access training tips and helped to keep me focused with timely updates and articles.
5.0

By: Richard B.

Posted: September 28, 2004

Wow, what a day

What a great course!! Toronto is a waterfront city and this marathon really showcases the best of Toronto. It was easy running - only a small incline/decline at the Boulevard Club and clean streets. Abundant and varied post-race food, fruit and drinks. Only suggestion would be to control access in the finishing chute as it was a little congested with family/well-wishers. This is definitely a must-do marathon!!!
4.0

By: Laurie F.

Posted: September 28, 2004

experience of a lifetime

Wow. Running the STWM was an experience of a lifetime! The course was beautiful, the weather was perfect and the spectators were great. It was my first marathon and an experience I'll never forget. I can't wait to run it again next year! LF
5.0

By: Sarah M.

Posted: September 28, 2004

Excellent Experience!!

An excellent course & experience for first time runners such as myself!! Will definitely do it again.
5.0

By: Robert S.

Posted: September 28, 2004

A perfect 10th marathon for me - and a PB!

Thanks for the memories - worth the trip from Bermuda.
5.0

By: Sandra R.

Posted: September 28, 2004

Thank you! Great event and great fan support.

I was expecting a typical Canadian race: well organized but little fan support. Toronto should be proud that not only was this event exceptionally organized (communication, great website, traffic, everything), but the support from the neighborhoods and fans was great. The fact that you had people around you at all times was a really great feeling. Thanks to the organizers and to the fans - your support was appreciated. I surpassed my goal!
5.0

By: alexandra s.

Posted: September 28, 2004

I will do this again next year!

This was my first marathon. I started with the early birds - what an awesome experience. The event was well organized and everyone was super friendly. The only improvement I can suggest is more bands or music along the course, especially after the 25 km mark. I can't wait to start training for next year; see you then!
5.0

By: Denise C.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Great Day for a Run

Great day for a run!
2.0

By: Barbara T.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Finish line was very crowded and disorganized

I personally feel there is NO excuse for not having enough finishing medals for the half marathon. I personally received a medal but I know that others did not. Organizers know exactly how many runners are registered therefore there is no reason for someone to cross the finish line and only receive a card congratulating them and saying their medal will be sent to them.
3.0

By: Paul N.

Posted: September 27, 2004

I loved the N/C sections. Thanks for the fun.

This was the first time I have run this marathon and I will definitely be back again next year. I loved the neighborhood cheering sections... they really made the race fun.
4.0

By: Mona L.

Posted: September 27, 2004

cool feeling

I had a great run at the Waterfront Marathon and was very happy with my time. I have to give you guys a LOW star on 'organization' for 2 BIG reasons. The first one is that after the finish line was crossed, it was disorganized and way too crowded to remove the chip and to receive the medal. You have lots of room on the road... use it to your advantage and have a better flow in the future. It is hard for the runner to simply stop in a crowded area after a long run. The second reason is actually UNACCEPTABLE and I would give a -1 star for your actions. My girlfriend finished her half marathon at 2:25:31 and she was told there were NO MORE medals to give and she simply got a card for her efforts. She was totally devasted and I am ashamed to read and see that Fauja Singh came in NOT SECONDS BUT 0:04:31 AFTER my girlfriend, and still got to have a medal around his neck (his time is 2:30:02). Great for him to have a world record but my girlfriend was just as special in my mind in doing her very first Waterfront Half Marathon.
3.0

By: Claudia T.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Well organized. Flat, scenic course.

My first marathon. Well organized. Flat scenic course. Weather was beautiful. Warm, clear and sunny. Great entertainment and volunteers.
5.0

By: Kristie C.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Worth the flight & jet lag

For anyone who has never done the early start - if you can, do it. It was absolutely gorgeous.
4.0

By: Roger Archambault

Posted: September 27, 2004

Lots of reasons to PB on this course

Awesome organizing committee, superb course, wonderful expo and great fans. What more can you ask for to get a PB and even surpass what you think you can do!
5.0

By: John S.

Posted: September 27, 2004

The course was somewhat boring but good for a PR

The race itself is predominantly flat. There was a slight incline from km's 21 through 29. It was not very scenic and the spectator support was sparse in many areas. However, if you have friends or family with you, it is relatively easy for them to get to different points of the course to cheer you on. You would have been hard pressed to know there was a marathon going on in the city however. Other than Saturday night when the start area was being set up (a passerby asked me what was going on?), you would have never known a marathon was happening. The host hotel made little or no mention of it (the pasta dinner was there Saturday night... but that's all the host hotel advertised). The expo was disappointing. It was touted as 4 times bigger than last year, yet there was not much there. Overall, it is a flat and open enough course to go for a personal best but boring, boring, boring. One other thing... the weather was warm for a marathon. Started in the low 50's and probably reached into the low 60's by race end. I was soaked about 12 km's into the race.
2.0

By: Angelo T.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Best Toronto Marathon

Have now run both Toronto Marathons. The Waterfront is definitely the race of choice. Although it does have little fan support and some boring and smelly stretches, the course is flat and has some nice views of Lake Ontario. The expo was small, but good, and the organization from beginning to end was topnotch. Add in a nice medal, a beautiful day, and an amazing race shirt, and this is definitely a race to consider.
4.0

By: Richard J.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Great race! Super course! Well organized.

Great marathon, very well organized and super volunteers along the route. The only change? Maybe an earlier start (07:00 a.m.). It started to warm up a bit at the end. Overall it was one the best marathons that I have ever run, even compared to international ones. Keep up the good work and a big thank you to all the volunteers; without them, this event probably would not happen.
5.0

By: heather h.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Great city, great run

The spectators were the best ever; numerous bands, cheering, different age groups, everyone was out to support. The course was a little dull compared with my expectations but still a wonderful race.
4.0

By: jan l.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Toronto did a fantastic job!

I have been lucky enough to run 61 marathons. Toronto was my first is Sept. 1984. I still receive the greatest satisfaction and thrill crossing the finish line. Toronto has a great waterfront - I am so glad we have a marathon by the water. Thanks to everyone who makes it possible. Jan L.
5.0

By: Michelle B.

Posted: September 27, 2004

This was an absolutely fabulous experience.

As a first time marathoner, I could not have had a better experience. The support on the course was great, the bands really helped to keep me going, and the spectators' support and enthusiasm were both encouraging and amazing.
5.0

By: joka f.

Posted: September 27, 2004

A little disappointed at the finish line

After 4 months of intense training for our group it was very disappointing to find out a medal was not available. Did the organization not know how many were entered on line even though the deadline was Tuesday at midnight??? Expo compared to Ottawa was very disappointing as well - a huge event with so little vendors?????
3.0

By: Angel A.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Truly a world class event!

This event is way up there with other big name races! The fabulous enroute entertainment reflects Toronto's diversity!
5.0

By: YING-HUA YU

Posted: September 27, 2004

Amazing Race!

I loved the flat, scenic waterfront route for this race. The weather was beautiful. The volunteers did an excellent job with refreshments. It was great having live music/cheering from each neighbourhood. The spectators, especially my friends, were there to support me during the last half of the race, when I need it most! =)
5.0

By: Pauline Haste

Posted: September 27, 2004

A BREATHTAKING EXPERIENCE

I will be 51 years young this September 29th 2004. 2 years ago I was diagnosed as having non-hodgkins lymphoma (thankfully dormant at the moment). I took up karate at this time, and due to the fitness level needed, I also took up some light running. With my running partner we soon progressed to 5k and then some local 10k events which I found challenging (and which also helped me realize that you can attain new interests in life even if you are given a bit of a jolt that reminds you how precious our time can be). We both followed the book with regard to long distance running (that's running, not racing), followed the diet, took our vitamins and before we knew it, there we were on the start line yesterday for our initial half-marathons, milling around with what seemed like the whole population of Toronto. I found the experience totally exhilarating and the camaraderie between the various competitors from all parts of the globe wonderful. I think we both did fairly well for a first go. I will definitely be back next year - who knows maybe run a full marathon; that would be something to tell my grandkids one day. Thank you to everyone, organisers, competitors, my running partner Robin Zacharias, and also our personal supporters, who seemed to pop up everywhere on the course to shout us on. I was also impressed by the attitude of spectators along the course who applauded everyone and made us feel like royalty. In these type of events everyone wins and that is surely the only way it should be. For us amateurs and enthusiasts long distance running is not about winning; it's more about a chance for an individual to put him or herself to the test. If you push yourself as hard as you can, do your very best and at the same time enjoy it, when you hit that finishing line, you have the same feeling as any Olympic gold medalist could have. See you next year...
5.0

By: Ismat B.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Long stretch without any spectators -

At some locations bands were great. Cadets did a great job. Canada Fit Water station was the best - only one that was cheering on the walkers and runners. Very disappointed half marathon got COTTON T-shirts compared to how the full got a dry fit one. THEN the medals for Half Marathon were finished.
2.0

By: carleen c.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Not as well organized as 2003.

This year's race was very disappointing. However even your questions here are obviously biased towards running. I did a PB in power walking, improved my score over six minutes yet didn't even benefit from a medal at the end. The early start to the half was useless; once the runners start you may as well get out of the way. I was tripped, spit on and yelled at. Until the Toronto Marathon recognizes the value of power walking as the Cleveland, Mississauga, Big Sur and other marathons do, it really is a second class event. In the questions below, please note - I power walked all - I didn't run. But I beat a lot of the runners, including the one who told me to get out of her way.
3.0

By: Barb M.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Great volunteers

The volunteers were great -- their positive comments and hard work were very much appreciated.
4.0

By: Sandra K.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Boston Qualifiers & Runners Should've Departed 1st

It was a great opportunity to share in a common goal. The volunteers were awesome, organizers were friendly & all participants were kind & positive. One suggestion would be to have those 'real runners' & Boston Qualifiers run first. It wasn't fair to them to have us amateurs in their way. I am sure it frustrated them to lose crucial seconds in attempting to pass us. The police escort was helpful, but they should have left first.
4.0

By: Michael Drescher

Posted: September 27, 2004

This was so much fun!!!

This was one of the most positive and fun experiences in my whole life. I was smiling all the time.
4.0

By: Suzanne C.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Breathtaking!

It was incredible. I did the early start so it was dark when I started @ 6:15. There were so many beautiful things to see: I saw the sun come up over the lake, a solitary swan in the harbour, the Leslie Spit and amazing choreography where the marathoners coming north and turning east at Lakeshore under the Gardiner met thousands of 5K’ers were running south and turning west at the Lakeshore – separated only by the low guardrail and egged on by very loud drum music. It was breathtaking (except that there was a severe shortage of breath on my part by that time!)
5.0

By: Vida Collis

Posted: September 27, 2004

A brilliant life-altering experience: Many thanks

Thank you to the organizers and volunteers who made it possible for me to fulfill my goal of running a marathon. I ran the half a few years ago and knew my first full would be with you. I was blown away at how much bigger the event has grown since 2000. It was great then and it was even better now. I enjoyed every moment of my first marathon. I finished a 'strong' 5:02 with the early-birds. (Thank you for the early start! It was a friendly, relaxing and fun way to start. I'll always recommend this option to my fellow plodders). I truly appreciate not only my efforts but the collective efforts of such a dedicated group of people. Stellor organization + enthusiastic volunteers + terrific crowd support + the happy spirits of the 'early birds' = a wonderful experience. Standouts include the passionate music encouraging my legs to keep going; the crowds of specators by the Leslie Spit, the Beaches and during the final 8 km to the end; and, most of all, the kids manning the water stations who were so eager to help and support the runners. Shout out to the kids between Tommy Thomspon and the Beaches - they rocked!). Thanks for keeping us safe, protected and motivated: I'll definitely be back again! Sincerely, Vida Collis
5.0

By: Francine P.

Posted: September 27, 2004

A perfect day!!

From start to finish, I was so pleased about this race! The weather, the course, the organization! Everything was super! Thank you Toronto for my personal best time!!
4.0

By: Larsen John

Posted: September 27, 2004

Double the runners but no lines

I couldn't believe that this marathon had nearly twice the participation of last year. There was no queuing for anything. I have never experienced that before. Well done!
4.0

By: fred t.

Posted: September 27, 2004

Great fun

First time for this run. Found the start a bit confusing. More speakers around the crowd and not just the front would help.
4.0

By: Jim W.

Posted: September 26, 2004

A pleasure to run

I can't wait to start training for the full.
4.0

By: Rafael C.

Posted: September 26, 2004

Thanks to the Pace Bunny

I ran the half marathon today. I want to thank the 1:45 pace bunny who turned around before the finish and encouraged me to run faster so that I could complete before 1:45. I did it in 1:43, chip time. Thanks to the Pace Bunny.
4.0

By: Brian Whittaker

Posted: September 26, 2004

I now know what a perfect marathon feels like!

This course was wonderful! Three opportunities to cross the lead runners as they sped along. The spit near the end was an opportunity to escape the crowds and enter into a runners only world where inspiration flowed from the other runners like the water surrounding us. A perfect marathon for first timers, Boston hopefuls, and veterans to the sport!!
5.0

By: Rose F.

Posted: September 26, 2004

Exciting race, awesome course.

The STWM was the most exciting and emotional race I have ever done in my life. The runners were great and the spectators offered nothing but encouragement. I just wish there were more spectators.
4.0

By: Gord Bambrick

Posted: September 26, 2004

An awesome event!

This was my first marathon, so the course was ideal and I thoroughly enjoyed the experience. The organization was perfect. The bands were great, the stations and facilities were excellent and the encouragement from everyone along the way was a big help to us first timers. Thank you!
5.0

By: david b.

Posted: September 26, 2004

Staggered starting times are a bad idea

Well organized - don't like staggered starting times.
3.0

By: Raymond G.

Posted: September 26, 2004

Superb in every way.

Ed Whitlock is a true inspiration to runners and non-runners alike. Next year, when I am 42, I hope to run as good as he does.
5.0

By: Kris D.

Posted: October 16, 2003

A decent first-time marathon

I liked this course because it is indeed flat - but I found the Spit section to be lonely and isolating, especially at the point where your body needs the most encouragement. If the course is to remain the same, maybe flip it so that runners are going through that section in their first half while they still fresh; that would leave the sections where interesting scenery and cheering spectators are needed the most for the second half. The spectators were few and fairly far between, but the ones that were there did their best to cheer us along. I cannot rave enough about the excellent organization and volunteers on the course. Kit pick-up was well organized and we completed it with no problems, and in a timely manner. Water and Gatorade stations were frequent and well-stocked, and the volunteers at the stations were happy and encouraging. Thank you all so much for donating your time! The police and marshalls on the course were equally worthy of applause. At the end of the course, I had a hard time getting a thermal blanket, and found that the food was not as plentiful as I would have liked. At just over 4 hours, it would have been nice to have something more than an orange, and I am not sure if the 4,000+ half-marathoners were supplied better because they get to the end of the course first? I'm not sure who ordered up the weather, but do you think they can duplicate it next year? All in all, a decent first time experience, and a race I will run again next year. Congratulations to all my fellow runners for their effort!
4.0

By: Choly Abalos Devera

Posted: October 13, 2003

5K Runner from Kingsville, Texas

First of all, I would like to extend my thanks to everyone for the opportunity to be able to participate in the Toronto Waterfront Marathon/Scotiabank 5km Run. I live in Kingsville, Texas and this was my very first time to run in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, so I did not know what to expect running in a very cold weather of Toronto as compared to the hot and humid weather of South Texas. However, it turned out to be a perfect day that day to run. I felt great after the run, with my time of 0:26.43.4 and, more so, when the final results came out that I placed first out of fifteen (15) runners in my age category, 60-64. Thanks for the wonderful weather and great workers, crowd and spectators, as well as, to my loving sister, Lilia Abalos Cuison and her very patient son, Mandy (from Markham, Ontario), for their support and encourgement by giving me a ride to the race and by taking my pictures during and after the run. I am looking forward to next year's event. Keep up the good work y'all!
5.0

By: Susan M.

Posted: October 05, 2003

Fast and fun

A super organized race, fast and easy course, nice view of the lake, nice weather, and a great looking medal.
4.0

By: Paul Romlewski

Posted: October 04, 2003

Had a great time for my first half-marathon !

This was my first half-marathon. Toronto's Waterfront is a great location to run. I had hoped to break 2 hrs and I did! I finished in 1:51:00. I thought the music along the way, and the water stations and nutrition at the end of the race were topnotch. Looking forward to my first full marathon in spring 2004 and probably full marathon in Toronto's Waterfront next September! PS. I turn 40-years old tomorrow!
4.0

By: Gary D.

Posted: October 04, 2003

Well organized, very flat, but dull marathon cours

This was my 4th marathon and I was finally able to qualify for Boston due in part to the very flat course. This course had very little elevation change at all, although it was rather boring. Lots of water and energy gels on the course (full water bottles at a couple of water stations). There weren't very many spectators on the course, but the few that were there offered lots of encouragement. I would recommend this marathon to anyone, but definitely to somebody who is looking for a very flat, fast course. Ps. Nice finisher's medal too.
4.0

By: Anne H.

Posted: October 03, 2003

Near perfect race

The only thing I would change is better distance signs. Very confusing signs for half-marathon until after we hit the 10k mark. (More portoloos on the course.)
5.0

By: Dan C.

Posted: October 03, 2003

Great course except for the spit section

I prefer this race to the October (Can. int.) marathon; however, I still think the best course was the one in the mid 80's starting at varsity stadium. Nevertheless, this is a great course. I like the fact that the streets are closed, that it is run in Sept., and that it loops so you can see the leaders. The only section I don't particularly like is the spit. In the past, there have been large unavoidable puddles, few spectators, and irate cyclists in this section.
4.0

By: Chris G.

Posted: October 03, 2003

Course isn't pretty, but it's as fast as they come

I don't think the course changed in any great way since last year, and as mentioned before there are some areas where there isn't much to look at... but if you're looking for a fast time, this is the place it will happen. This may be a case of "if you spend it, they will come". With decent prize money and great spacing of the water/Gatorade stations, this race will start to attract a following for sure. It doesn't hurt that the likes of Ed Whitlock and Fauja Singh set age group world records. If there is a Toronto race that should 'go away' as previously mentioned, it is the CIM, or the TIM, or whatever they are calling it this year. I'll be back at this race for my next PR for sure.
4.0

By: Ellen L.

Posted: October 03, 2003

Extremely well organized

Very well run event. Volunteers were amazing. The eastern end and Leslie Street Spit part seemed to go on FOREVER!!
4.0

By: Mark DeSouza

Posted: October 02, 2003

Fantastic Marathon

This is the best marathon I have ever run. The course, the bands and the fans were great. I will do it again next year. I would recommend this marathon to all runners around the world. The weather was excellent.
5.0

By: Nancy Fisher

Posted: October 02, 2003

I enjoyed the half marathon once again

It was a good race all around... but the food quantity and set-up last year was better.
3.0

By: Al S.

Posted: October 02, 2003

Fast, flat, but rather boring course for the half

Ran the half. Easy packet pick-up, friendly volunteers. Decent expo. Course was flat, fast but rather boring, especially running under the Gardiner Expressway for some time. Crowds were sparse on the course but supportive. Larger crowd at finish line. Course support was good. Overall a decent marathon and would do it again if visiting Toronto at that time of the year.
3.0

By: DAVID C.

Posted: October 02, 2003

Toronto's Best Marathon

I thought this was a well organized race. I have run over 30 marathons in Canada and the USA and rank this marathon as one of the better marathon's as far as organization is concerned. It is also traffic-free, which is a bonus. The only negative comment is that the Leslie Split is a bit of a drag - I would have rated the course a 5 instead of a 4. Perhaps if the race ran through the beaches and doubled back it would be a bit better.
4.0

By: Lori M.

Posted: October 01, 2003

I love TO! These roads were made for running!

I found the course to be filled with beautiful scenery, and wonderful volunteers to help us through our journey. The music and encouraging spectators were a bonus. The whole event was flawlessly organized from start to finish.
5.0

By: Avery J.

Posted: October 01, 2003

A Great Race!

The Skydome hotel was great. The expo was great [I got a few good deals]. The pasta dinner was good. The weather during the race was great, the specatators were motivating, and the refreshment stands well placed. Glad to hear that Ed Whitlock and Fauja Singh achieved their goals in the race that I was a participant in. I just checked my expo pack, and noticed a coupon offering a discount for the 2004 race. I will be there!
5.0

By: virginia l.

Posted: October 01, 2003

Young marathon needs more support

The first half is great, but that Leslie St. Spit destroys your spirit. With no specatators and hardly any support, and no music, it was the hardest portion - especially when people are hitting the wall. the original course of 2000/1 was better.
3.0

By: Ian Wiggins

Posted: October 01, 2003

Everything came together for a great experience

Once again, everything went off smoothly. The runners, the weather, the course, the officials, the organizers all cooperated to make this a great experience for everyone.
4.0

By: Eileen T.

Posted: October 01, 2003

I had an awesome experience

This was my first half marathon. I had an awesome experience. Just wish there were more spectaors along the course.
3.0

By: Christian L.

Posted: September 30, 2003

ORGANIZATION PLEASE!!!!

One of the WORST organized events. The course was terrible. Why not have it move through the neighbourhoods of Toronto? Instead it is ALONG THE DIRTY HIGHWAY. And what about markings? No mile markers!? Spend some of the registration fee on cardboard & paint and give us some distance markers! It's never a good thing when fellow runners ask you if you have any clue where we are in the course. MERGE IT WITH THE CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL MARATHON and get us a good route! Make us proud, not embarrassed - these events attract international attention!
1.0

By: Mike Wall

Posted: September 30, 2003

Awesome volunteers on the course!

This was my best marathon yet... okay, it was also my first, but still great fun. Keep up the great work, sorry I couldn't last the whole 42.2 km, I'll try again next year in Ottawa, as it's home.
4.0

By: Ruth Moffatt

Posted: September 30, 2003

The runners were well taken care of

Kudos to the organizers of this event. Not only was I able to start early but I felt as though my every need was taken care of for the whole distance be it the water, to the gels, to the Gatorade to the police, to the race marshalls and to the porta potties. Hey, it's the little things and for this I thank you. I've only run one other marathon - NYC in '02, so I have to remark that the spectators of Toronto don't hold a candle to the millions that come out for NYC and I have to wonder why? As a Canadian living in NYC, my loyalty is as a Canadian and I wore the flag proudly during the NYC marathon to the ear-splitting cheering from the sidelines. Where was the ear-splitting cheering on Sunday while two world records were set? Come on Toronto, wake up and show Boston and New York that you are a world-class running city as well.
3.0

By: Mark Gommer

Posted: September 30, 2003

Fast and almost perfectly flat.A great course.

My only real criticism of the race is that there need to be more water stations on the course. Other than that it is perfect!
4.0

By: Robert Morrone

Posted: September 30, 2003

A great course and day to run in Toronto

Before the race, I was a little worried about my shoes, since I let them go a little too long (I was expecting blisters!). I decided to hang back and run the race like a distance training run for the first 25km and then see how I felt and kick it up a notch if I felt good. So, I started way in the back of the pack, put my cap low so I wouldn't see all the racers running ahead of me and just strolled along. We headed west along Lake Ontario for about 8km which were nice easy kilometers to do, the wind was at our backs. I felt really good. We turned at about the 9km mark and started headed east back towards downtown Toronto (along the lake again). Around the 12 km mark I started to get a nervous attack (I don't know why) and my legs felt wobbly. In long training runs I don't ever get that kind of feeling so I hunkered down and envisioned being on my training run (where would I be at 12km in my training run). I also popped a gel pack and ran on. There were some great bands playing music, from jazz to calypso, along the route, which was a great distraction from the monotony of running that kind of distance. But ultimately this distance race is about mental training more than physical training - the test was yet to come. At the half way point (21.6km) I was at a good pace 1hr 49 mins and was feeling really great. We continued heading east along the lake front until the 24th kilometer, where we turned around to head back again. I was feeling really good and was passing many runners that had past me before. But the test for me is always between the 28th and 36th kilometer. I ran hard to the 27th kilometer, where this course takes us onto a man made spit that extends into Lake Ontario. This is a pretty isolated part of the course that has in the past brought me to near defeat. It runs for about 9 kilometers. This time I was mentally prepared for it but it was grueling. I was still running strong when I emerged from the spit and was invigorated to see the 36 km milestone. I was still picking up runners along the way. By the time I hit the 37th kilometer I was starting to feel some burning in my thighs but decided to increase my speed rather than decrease it; this may not have been prudent. When I hit the 39th kilometer I slowed down a little to give my burning legs a chance to recuperate and so that I could finish strong. Regardless, I continued to pick up runners and pass them. I was still feeling great and I knew I was going to finish and do fairly well. When I hit the 41st km I turned on the jets and sprinted (as much as you can sprint after running 41 km), to the finish line. I passed 5-6 runners along that last kilometer. I finished with an official time of 3h 36 minutes. I was extremely happy with this finish as I have not done this well since before my knee surgery. It is the best time I have posted in the last 4 marathons. I would definitely recommend this race and will do it again.
4.0

By: Janet K.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Excellent experience for a 1st-timer

So great. Thank you. Just a couple of experiences from a first-time marathoner: early on the gels were not well advertised, so our group running with the 4:15 bunny did not see any gels until after 18 km... apparently they were at 10 km but not obvious. The only other thing was not so much with the race but the hotel, and don't know if you have any control over this, but no breakfast was available until 6:15 am.
5.0

By: Vicki B.

Posted: September 29, 2003

I was truly disappointed at my 1st marathon

I entered the 1/2 marathon. I can't run, and I walked it. I was told that the course would be open for 5 hours - more than enough time for me to finish. At 3 1/2 hours they opened the road to traffic and took all the markings away. I got LOST. I had to wander around the city asking directions to the finish line. Not a happy experience. There were no spectators to speak of. The only post-race food offered were plain bagels and fruit. The only good thing about it was that the route was flat.
2.0

By: Simon H.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Fast, flat course with no traffic

The Waterfront Marathon was great in 2003. Weather was perfect, great organization, lots of equally-spaced water stations with very energetic helpers. Course is flat with no traffic issues. It was a small marathon with about a 1,000 runners, much larger half with 4,000+. Spectators are sparse on course but fantastic in the finish area. Pasta dinner was held in race hotel. it was a low-key aFfair, but was well done with the Canadian female record-holder for the marathon as the guest speaker. The Jays and Indians were playing Saturday night as the Skydome, so you could take in a ball game if you wished! Lots of hotels within easy walking distance. Overall, a great event, and I got my Boston qualifying time to boot!
3.0

By: Karyn Holowaty

Posted: September 29, 2003

Excellent Race!

This was my second 5K race since I first started running in July. I thought the race was very well organized, and everyone was very helpful and supportive! I can't wait to run again! Maybe next year I'll try the half!!!
4.0

By: Leaha M.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Great day!

The volunteers were great! The Leslie Street Spit was hot! Otherwise, it was a fantastic day and a great race.
4.0

By: Paul F.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Time

Better time and distance information on the half-marathon course would have been better. Otherwise excellent!
3.0

By: D....... H.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Obvious focus on runners, not walkers!

What began as a lovely experience ended in great frustration (and discomfort) for several of us 1/2 marathon walkers: 1. Your website says that the course would be reopened to vehicular traffic at 1:00 pm. Can someone explain why police told us, then forced us, to use the bicycle path at 10:40 am, which was a good 9 kms from the finish line?? 2. Doesn't it make sense that WALKING 1/2 marathoners might be out there a lot longer than runners? So, whose ill-thought decision was it to pack up ALL of the water stations on the return half, leaving a bunch of dehydrating participants far from any source of liquid?? 3. It was a nice touch to remove the orange pylons AND any marathon personnel after marker 15 kms. This left a bunch of us with absolutely no clue about finding the rest of the course (especially since all pylons, markers, personnel had now disappeared). We had no choice but to depend on bad advice from either police or Sunday strollers. So, in the 3 areas noted above, the organizers/promoters of this marathon have misrepresented the event. Those of us who were adversely affected by either thoughtlessness or negligence on the part of the marathon organizers should be getting much more than a medal - we should be getting apologies AND our registration fees back!! On the plus side, however, I thank the expo people who were SUPER-organized and pleasant when I picked up my race package - they made me feel very special about my first-ever race!
2.0

By: Kevin B.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Good fast race, well organized!

Very fast and fun course that lacked spectators in certain parts. Otherwise, was fun and well organized.
4.0

By: Mark R.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Toronto's Best Marathon/Half

Of the two races in Toronto, the CIM (Toronto Marathon) and the Waterfront, this is the better race. Neither are really visually stunning. The spectators are very sparse at both. However, the end of the CIM is very discouraging. Starting with the turn of Bayview into a desolate industrial area and the nasty (small but long) hill up to the finished line really make me prefer this Waterfront Marathon.
3.0

By: Jenni Conway

Posted: September 29, 2003

Walkers need not apply

Those of us who chose to walk the half-marathon were treated like second-class citizens. According to the marathon website, the route was supposed to be open to us until 1:30 pm. (We asked many officials, but no one seemed to know the cut-off time.) Unfortunately, by 10:45 we were being told to get off the road and by 11:15 traffic was allowed back onto the street. It feels as though our efforts were not appreciated. Our only consolation is that we raised money for a good cause, but because of the way we were treated we are unlikely to participate again.
3.0

By: Pirjo D.

Posted: September 29, 2003

This was my first and I throughly enjoyed it!!

The flyer and the online registration should have the same information. Pick-up hours were different on each which caused a problem on Friday night. The person on the door was not even apologetic. All he kept saying was, "There's nothing I can do". No "sorry" or anything. There were people there at 8:15 pm and it was closed. Online it said until 9:00 pm.
4.0

By: Ian M.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Great event, well run and organized

As the spouse of a participant, I was impressed with the overall event and the caliber of the volunteers. For the future, I'd suggest that you provide the participants with a plastic bag to hold the great fruit and drinks being offered. In the excitement of the finish, many want the nurishment but not at the time it is being offered. A minor comment from an interested observer.
5.0

By: Chris M.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Awesome Run

Awesome job! Great race; you guys should be organizing the TO Marathon.
4.0

By: Tom Goguen

Posted: September 29, 2003

Great course and spectators; however...

The course was well marked and quite flat, which made it very pleasant to run. The spectators on course were very supportive and water stations were very well run. However, there didn't appear to be power-gels anywhere - they may have been available but I didn't see anyone handing them out. Also, kilometer markers were to be frequent; however, there were only two that were plainly visible, and both said 10K and were about 3 km apart!!!!
4.0

By: nancy a.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Great Training Run

Flat, easy course. Plenty of water, and multi-flavored Gatorade offered at 2.5 kms. Nice touch that beverages are handed out. Did it as a training run for a fall marathon and it was excellent since the course is straight and flat. Pacing bunnies were provided! Easy quick start, no lingering around. Friends tried to find us along the course and that was difficult due to the map provided. Not clear enough where to go when you are a tourist and not a local. No major crowd support other than the start and at a few points, which is why I think it is a great long run rather than a marathon.
3.0

By: Rob Peck

Posted: September 29, 2003

A wonderful event.

What I liked: Darn near everything! Particularly: 1.) The 6:15 am start for runners expecting to take between 5 and 6.5 hours. (The main pack of 756 marathoners started at 7:30 am.) I was a first-timer and it took a lot of the anxiety out of participating since I was pretty sure I could finish before they closed the race down, and because I could see there were quite a few people in my situation. 2) All the nice people. The pace bunnies who were so helpful. Ray Bielawski of Ray's Runners (who organized the early start for us slowpokes) who was so supportive of everybody. The volunteers at every aid station. The police who manned the intersections. The fans who lined the route. The other runners who were uniformly positive with everyone. The medics who checked us in at the finish. The announcer who called our names out as we came in. The people who cheered us along the way by name. 3) The website. Very positive and runner-friendly - especially for first-timers such as myself. 4) The brochure. Cheeky and fun. 5) The overall organization. It was a mammoth undertaking that was extremely well designed and implemented. One suggestion for improvement: More Port-o-lets! At most, if not all, water stations there were only 2 Port-o-lets for both directions. I was in the 6:15 start with only 54 runners. Even so, when I stopped after about an hour to use one facility, I had to wait 5 minutes to get in. I shudder to think how the main crowd fared when they got there.
5.0

By: L. D.

Posted: September 29, 2003

The 'Water Boys/Girls' were fantastic!!!!!

I wish the markers were defined much bigger & bolder for the 1/2 marathon & the full marathon.
4.0

By: Demetra P.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Well organized, uniform course, FUN!

This race was great. It had ample support, more than enough water stations. The course itself had uniform elevation. The final third was kind of depressing, running along a lonely stretch of barren land. I ran this race two years ago and that bit was at the beginning (route was in reverse) and I think that was better. The steel drum bands helped keep us upbeat. Almost no spectators (apart from the wonderful race volunteers who were very encouraging) lined the course, though more publicity should change that in the future. Overall I had a great time!
3.0

By: Richard D.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Had a great time

I ran the 5K and found it to be well organized, fun, and the weather really cooperated. There were many inspirational moments, and it was great to see all the family and friends who came out to cheer us all on. Hope to do it again next year.
5.0

By: Denis Sacks

Posted: September 29, 2003

Great Course!

Well organized. Great course to run a PB on, and I should know: ran a 35-yr PB (2:58), after setting long-term PB's in previous 2 years on this course... 3:10, 3:03, and now 2:58! Course is flat, scenic & has NO TRAFFIC.
4.0

By: Nicole Scarlett

Posted: September 29, 2003

Ray's Runners & Early Starters

THANK YOU for Ray's Runners! I finished my last marathon in 5:15+. I never gave up, but it was a little discouraging to be passed by faster runners during the entire event. Determined not to quit running marathons, I ran the Scotia Waterfront race, but with the 6:15 am starting crowd 'Ray's Runners'. I felt more energized being with people I could keep up with and finishing with the bulk of the crowd vs. bringing up the rear. I am sure this was a major contribution to shaving 45 minutes off my last time. Bless your heart Rays Runners! Wish every event would do this to encourage those of us just there to finish with a smile - no matter how long it takes. PS: BLESS THE VOLUNTEERS & POLICE who supported us before dawn. You're the best. Wish there was more opportunity for spectators to access the course along the way (parking, road access, or cycling). Getting in/out of the area was a challenge. But, I will definitely see you next year!
3.0

By: Mica A.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Easy, flat course; well organized and executed

Course is easy, out-and-back format. Flat overall with a few easy grades at intervals that won't destroy average runners. Ideal race as a Boston qualifier or a first-time marathoner. Excellent support on-course with water every 2-3 km, medical periodically. Enthusiastic crowds and supportive volunteers throughout. Well organized and executed!
4.0

By: Pamela N.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Take out the Leslie Spit portion

The course is great - except the Leslie Spit, which is too long, too boring, and has no spectators. Course should continue along Queen St. which would be more scenic and easier for spectators to get to. Course could do Queen Street to Silver Birch, then along the boardwalk, then maybe back via Queen Street. Much more scenic and goes through more city streets so spectators can come out. Also highlights the city for out-of-town runners (for example, run past City Hall). If you are interested, I would gladly prepare the route for next year!!!
3.0

By: Alan S.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Excellent - good job, see you next year

This was my first marathon and I am very impressed with the organization, course and volunteers. See you next year! Thank you Toronto!!
5.0

By: Jenaya L.

Posted: September 29, 2003

My first half-marathon experience was very

I just wanted to say that for my first half-marathon race I had a great time at the Scotiabank Waterfront Half-Marathon. I especially want to say that the kids working the water stations were great - cheering and encouraging all of us. Thanks!
4.0

By: Laurie M.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Stupendous

Great course! Great weather! Great Volunteers! Plenty of water stations and power gels. Music was awesome! Spectators could have been louder!
3.0

By: Andrew Dalakoudis

Posted: September 29, 2003

Great Race

This was a great race, good fun and FLAT... The one thing I would improve next year is the KM markers. I ran the half and found myself confused as to which markers were for my race. Keep up the great work. I'm off to Athens next month to run the marathon and the challenge of a lifetime...
4.0

By: Megan Bazuk

Posted: September 29, 2003

First time spectacular

This was the first year I have run a road 1/2 marathon. I would highly recommend it to anyone looking for a course to try for their first time! I loved it!
4.0

By: Dick G.

Posted: September 29, 2003

Beautiful course

Well marked route, with volunteers at all turns. Waterstations: please set them all up in the same configuration and at even distances.
3.0

By: Ken W.

Posted: September 28, 2003

Fast, flat course with perfect weather

My wife and I ran it today for the first time. The comments last year were very negative. The organizers must have listened to the comments. The course is very flat with only a few small hills. Today a 92-year old man broke 6 hours in a time of 5:40. This is a new world record. This guy came in looking fresh as a daisy. I hope to God that I will be able to run at 92, let alone live that long. Also Ed Whitlock became the first man in history at the age of 72 to break 3 hours. Many people commented last year that the scenery was awful. I thought it was fine. For example, last spring we ran the Ottawa Marathon and they had the Tulip Festival going on. A number of people asked me how I enjoyed seeing all the tulips along the marathon. I said, "What tulips?" It is the same for this course. When you run with a group you are more concerned with your splits than you are the scenery. The water stations were well stocked and the people at them were very encouraging. The water stations were nicely spaced apart every 2-2 1/2 KMs. The KM markers were easy to spot as long as you realized that the yellow markers were for the marathoners and the red markers were for the half marathoners. There was very little crowd support along most of the route, but at the finish there was a huge throng of people. That always makes you feel good at the end. The runners on the course were all supportive of each other and there were many smiling faces encouraging each other. This year the weather was absolutely perfect. Very little wind, with lots of sunshine and a starting temperature of 11 Celsius.
4.0

By: Kirk L.

Posted: September 28, 2003

Just bad!!!

Sure the course is flat, but what is there to look at? Nothing. The crowds are small, the scenery is boring, and you generally feel alone. This should not be the case when your in the largest city in Canada. You would think a race organizer would understand the importance of promotion? So what is with the t-shirt that no one will ever wear. People usually enjoy wearing their race t-shirt with pride, to let other people know that they are a runner. Last year's shirt was the worst and this year's is not much better! The course needs to be changed! So what if you have to change the name from 'Waterfront' to something else. The race should be run in the city and in the spring.
2.0

By: Patricia C.

Posted: September 28, 2003

Great course, good music, wonderful day

I thought the course was excellent. It was a real treat to be able to watch the marathoners (especially the leaders) as we were running the half. Although the music was good, would have liked to have heard a few more bands!
4.0

By: Ryan L.

Posted: September 28, 2003

Great race!

Where were the spectators? Great day for a run.
3.0

By: Peter H.

Posted: September 28, 2003

A good marathon with potential to be great

I only did the half this year (I'm training for Chicago), but I'm very familiar with the course. The ideal thing would be a merger of the two Toronto marathons, with a single great route through more neighborhoods & scenery.
2.0

By: Avid local runner

Posted: May 28, 2003

Room to improve

The half-marathon is a great route, and the 5km run is one of the city's best races at that distance. However, the last half of the full-marathon course seems repulsive and boring, and this is where the event needs to improve. And why is it only one month prior to the CIM and Niagara Marathons? Why not hold it in March (Toronto badly needs a pre-spring marathon)?
3.0

By: Nick D.

Posted: May 20, 2003

Ugly and boring course

I agree with my buddy: this was not a good event. The part under the highway and the long run up the dump into the lake was really bad. No people around, and very few water stations made it worse. It was also windy the whole time, and this made it difficult near the end.
1.0

By: Lori B.

Posted: January 16, 2003

cheap!!

I run with MDI and though there are a few runners in this group who push this event....... only because they work for it, it's a bad marathon. This year I voluntered for it at a water station. I think the whole group would agree, it's an ugly course in a desolute area of the city with no spectators, or life. A marathon needs life, this one doesn't have it! It is so disorganized, with a bad expo, a worse pasta dinner, cheap shirts that I use to wash the car with, and nothing on the route of interest unless you like bleak dark grey concrete and miles of landfill (theres a reason they call it the spit). Why does Toronto have 2 marathons anyway? This one should go away. If this is what Scotiabank supports, I think I'll switch banks. I would not recommend it to anyone.
1.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 29, 2002

Needs work!!!!

There was no publicity, no one even knew it was happining, which was evident with the angry drivers. There were no people to be seen for most of the course except at the water stops. The course was not well marked and I heard at the finsih line many people saying the same thing - the km points were off and many were missing totally. Whats that about??? How can they run a marathon that is so disorganized. There was no medical or massage at the finish line and I really could have used it. The price is not worth it in my opinion. Run a different marathon, as this one needs much more work. Almost forgot, they should start at a later time.
1.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 26, 2002

Good marathon, could use more scenic course.

This course in flat except for a slight incline in the last kilometer as you approach the last turn to the finish. The course has several out-and-backs. The first one is nice as it goes along Lakeshore Boulevard. That is maybe the first 15K. Then it gets rather dull as it goes through miles and miles of what seems to be an industrial area. Very few spectators on the course, but most who were out there were enthusiastic, including the police officers. On-course support was excellent with lots of water, Gatorade and four Power Gel stands. The music, particularly the live performances, was good. I liked being able to use toilets in Metro Hall before the race and then afterwards to wash up and change my clothes. They also had portable toilets. I would have liked a larger expo before the race and some salty foods after. I am one of those runners you see totally encrusted with salt after a marathon and it would be nice to have some pretzels or chips immediately to start replenishing the sodium levels. Fortunately, I have learned to bring my own. I wish I knew on race day that I was second in my age group rather than third. I would have preferred the 2nd place prize, but by time I discovered it I was already home in the U.S. The weather was suprisingly hot and humid. Great for spectating but not so good for trying to run a PR. Oh well, maybe next time. Overall this marathon was a good experience for me and I would do it again.
3.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 16, 2002

Excellent course, excellent organization !!!!!

This was the first time I had run this race. I have done other half marathons and this was with out a doubt the best one - great charity, great volunteers, flat course, well organized and lots of music, fans and entertainment. Well Done!!!!!!!
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 22, 2002

needs a better course

They should try to run in some nicer areas with people. The registration was not very well organized and expo was very small, not even a real expo. My advice is to run the real marathon in October, the far better CIM instead. It's really dumb that Toronto has two marathons anyway.
1.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 18, 2002

Don't waste your money!

The whole thing was just Poor.
2.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 11, 2002

dark and lonely

It's run under the freeway and in a dilapidated, dingy unatractive part of Toronto. They should start at a later time, and change the course to include more of the city's residential and commercial areas. There were no spectators and very little on course support. The finish line was a mess and I had to search until I found a medal myself in a box under a table at the side of the road.
1.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: July 10, 2002

Realy Baaaad Race

This was the worst marathon I've ever run. No spectators and a ugly boring course and very poorly organized. There was not enough water stations for some people and I heard that they ran out of water for some of the slower runners, totally unacceptable when only 450 people are running. They also ran out of food at the fininsh line and the choice was very limited to begin with, unless you wanted week old bagels! There were no facilities at the finish area like massage, or first-aid. The course was not well marked and several km markers were off by at least 100', broken glass and garbage and a smell that could knock you out along portions of the course made for a very unpleasant experience. The shirts and medals,if you could find them were not great. This event needs a great deal of work if its ever to compete.
1.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 27, 2001

A very good race to set a personal best

In general, the Toronto Waterfront Marathon is a very good race for a first time marathoner or for anyone who is trying to qualify for Boston. The course is 95% flat with maybe one or two freeway overpasses that serve as hills. There were few spectators along the course; however, the few that were there were very encouraging. There were adequate aid stations stocked with water and Gatorade along the course. However, there were no Port-a-Potties along the way. Moreover, I did not notice anyone handing out oranges or vaseline (although I believe one aid station did have bananas). The expo was very small and the food at the end of the race was limited. (bagels, yogurt, gatorade, and bananas). The finisher's medal and the marathon T-shirts were not great either. Overall though, the race was well organized and the volunteers were wonderful. I had no problem picking up my race packet, championchip, or getting directions. I would definitely recommend this marathon to anyone who wants a fast 'stress-free' course. I shaved 45 minutes off of my previous marathon! Plus, Toronto is a GREAT city to visit and Canadians are some of the nicest people that you can meet.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 25, 2000

A very well organized race

Not enough fans cheering on the runners. Although it was nice not having to contend with traffic as the roads were blocked off. I thought the expo was very well organized with ample food, bagels, bananas, pudding, as much as you wanted. I paid to race not to eat. I had a great time and look forward to it next year
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 25, 2000

Flat course, not bad for the first time

2000 was the first year this marathon was run. The course is flat, containing 3 out and back legs. The route goes along the waterfront which is very scenic. The organization was good, running alongside the more popular 1/2 marathon. If you're looking for a fast time this is a good course. (They should have timing mats at the turn around points as there is lots of opportunity to take a short cut if you wanted.) No problems with the traffic as the main roads are completely closed off. Maybe next time they could drain the puddles on the road (Leslie Spit) so you don't have to run through them. They may consider having Vaseline or Tiger Balm on the course to assist the runners who are in need. The food was poor at the end consisting of bagels and bananas, water and Gatorade (as if you hadn't had enough at the end of the race) plus some pudding at the other end of the expo. Of the few spectators that were there, they were great. Overall it is a good flat course. I'm sure that this will become more popular in the future.
3.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide