Advertise with UsContact Us
Calendars
Event InfoResultsReviews
Steamboat Marathon
Back

Steamboat Marathon - Race Reviews

4
Average rating based on 60 Reviews

By: James C.

Posted: June 15, 2017

Awesome scenery

The expo was small but it was held at a really nice ski & bike shop so you were able to get gels if you needed it. My wife was able to use the $10 coupon from my bib for a pair of flip flops. Vendors and sponsors were in tents in the parking lot. I went to the expo on Saturday afternoon and they had plenty of t-shirts in all sizes. I've run 23 marathons and this was the most scenic course I've run. We ran past ranchlands with the Rockies in the distance. The course was downhill but with lots of rolling hills. The weather was sunny with temps around 50F at the start but it got into the 70's fairly quickly. There was hardly any shade on the course but I put on sunscreen before the race. They had some at the start if you needed it. Not many spectators along the course as the organizers discouraged people from driving on the route. It was a 2-lane road and only one lane was open to traffic in both directions. Volunteers at the aid stations were great. At a station around Mile 18, a volunteer took my water bottle as I ran past, filled it with Powerade, and caught up with me to give it back. Overall, this was a really nice marathon with awesome scenery and great but slightly warm weather but don't expect to PR.
5.0

By: Ken O.

Posted: June 05, 2017

Great Race - Need more Aid Stations

SBS Marathon is well organized and well done marathon with breath taking scenery. Recommend aid stations spaced out every 2 miles after mile 13. Runners were hurting with the warm temperatures. Suggest the aid station with only beer have water/power aid to assist runners. Mile marker 14's message says it all - 'Hydration is key'. Support the runners.
4.0

By: mark s.

Posted: June 08, 2015

Great point-to-point scenic course

Great cool weather in 2015 for the first 20 miles, a lot of shade too. Overall downhill and many small hills. Around 22 one long incline, this is also about where the shade stopped and the heat started - also the end of 'scenic'. Good aid stations but there could have been more. Few spectators until the last mile. Overall a great small town marathon in a fantastic place. One to do again!
4.0

By: Phil P.

Posted: June 01, 2014

great course good water stations but not enough

Very well organized from top to bottom. Good stocked and supported water stations, could have used one more in the first half of the marathon with the altitude. I prefer a t-shirt that actually says Steamboat Springs Marathon. Nobody from my family and few runners at the start of the race knew what SBS stood for.
4.0

By: Pearl S.

Posted: June 10, 2013

Beautiful! Fun! Needs Better Website Info!

This was my second marathon. The course is completely gorgeous - rolling hills all the way with a killer hill around 21 that was really tough given the heat. I'm in agreement that this shouldn't be your first marathon, not only because of the hilly course, but because of the lack of spectators. The people who are watching are enthusiastic, but they are few and far between, and the nature of the course makes it difficult to follow your runner. There were tons of bathrooms at the start, but too few until the half mark. There should be two port-a-potties at every site at least. I'd also agree that the post-party was lacking, especially in food which should be placed immediately after the finish. The most important thing the organizers should do is review the website. Directions to the expo site, for example, would have been helpful to post. I also would have liked an FAQ email to be sent prior to the expo just to fill in some missing information. To end on a good notethe people running the race - both runners and organizersare some of the nicest people I've met anywhere. I've never felt quite so supported by other runners during a race as I did during this one. So that, plus the AWESOME views will keep me coming back.
4.0

By: Robert H.

Posted: June 07, 2013

Great small race

Easily the most difficult course I've done. Living in Houston there's no way to train for the altitude and also for the hills. Still, I enjoyed the challenge and the beautiful scenery along the way. Pros -Beautiful course. Winding your way through the Yampa Valley and along the Elk River provided great scenery while running the marathon. -Small field. Sometimes I like running big races, but sometimes I prefer a smaller and less crowded atmosphere. The Steamboat Marathon had ~250 people run it, so for the majority of the course I was by myself and this provided a great opportunity to have some solitude and 'me' time while running in the Rockies. -Technical t-shirt has good design. Nothing's worse than doing a marathon and getting a crappy-looking shirt that I'll never wear (think Toronto Marathon.) Cons -They had plastic cups at the aid stations...really?! After 32 years of running this race they haven't figured out that they should be using paper cups? It's frustrating when trying to drink and run at the same time and spilling half the water b/c you can't fold the cup. -The aid stations were well placed throughout the course, but towards the end they really should have had bananas, orange slices, pretzels, etc... They did have Honey Stingers, but I've never heard of those and didn't want to risk trying something new during this race. They really should consider other food snacks at the aid stations in the last 10K. Overall, if you're looking for a small, summer marathon with some great scenery, Steamboat should be on your list.
4.0

By: Andrew L.

Posted: June 06, 2013

Fun! Hard! Race organization a little lacking.

Course: is beautiful. Long rolling hills for entirety of course which makes this a hard marathon and not a PR or BQ course. Very little shade. Sometimes running directly into oncoming traffic. Organization: Online is terrible and lacking in information. No race shirts other than in XL for men was stupid and left a bad taste. No need for a prior day expo for less than 300 runners. Could have done a morning pickup. Bus transportation, gear check, start area and aid stations were handled well. Finish area was a joke. Maybe a banana? Fans/spectators: None, other than aid station folks or a few people in their front yards. Note: they don't make this clear because of the non-existent web presence, but your family can't see you on the course even if they want to as traveling anywhere on the course is discouraged. Altitude: This was my first race at altitude and everything was fine after the first mile or so (for any flatlanders out there). Overall: It was fun and unique. As it was a destination race that coincided with a family trip, I won't be back. Race organization is a little lacking and it shows. Nothing to do with size as I have run races with less than 100 people that were run better and felt 'bigger'.
3.0

By: Michelle L.

Posted: June 02, 2013

Don't bother

Pros: - well organized bus transportation to the start - plenty of port o potties at the start Cons - ran out of ALL men's shirt sizes at the (poor excuse for an) expo - PLASTIC cups at the aid stations (who made that decision?) - not enough aid stations - you had to pay for the post race beer (which is pretty criminal for a Colorado race where post race beer is STANDARD) - you also had to pay for a post race massage (first time in 15 marathons I've seen that) - post race food was virtually non existent (tiny subway sandwich, cookie and chips was all you got) - age group awards were pretty pathetic....we just ran a marathon! Smartwool (main sponsor) needs to step it up in this department Basically the marathon is the sideshow event of the half marathon. I wouldn't waste my time with this one again....you can get stellar scenery at other small marathons in CO and avoid all these cons.
2.0

By: Steven S.

Posted: June 10, 2012

Scenic course well organized

Had run the half several times before. The full had a field of under 400 runners which made aid stations very easy to get fluid at. Spaceing of aid stations was perfect for me. The stations are closer together on the second half of the course. If you were patient on the downhills early and saved something for the last 6 tough miles you prob. enjoy this race. It was very important to be well trained for both downhill and uphill running. If your training was all about running fast and flat this course would chew you up badly. It got warm near the end, maybe 80, on the asphalt, but again if you trained for the heat and ran smartly, not a problem. With the temps and hills I would not recommend this race for a first timer or anyone that takes much more than 4 hours to complete the race. Despite the overall net drop, elevations are in the 7000's and the ups and downs, etc.. make this far from an ideal course to think about pr s on. The only thing this race has lost on lately are the quality of awards for placing runners. I did not see any prizes that would not find their way to the trash can pretty quickly.
5.0

By: mark s.

Posted: June 06, 2012

Great small town race!

Fantastic race in a great location. Weather was ideal in 2012, bus transport to the start was well organized. Aid stations were fun and well stocked, great volunteers. A brutal & long hill at mile 22. Overall a great race, one I hope to do again!
4.0

By: Steph W.

Posted: June 03, 2012

Awfully uphill for an downhill marathon.

This was my first marathon. Definitely glad I did it, but probably wouldn't recommend it to other first time marathoners. I did it was 4 other first time marathoners and we all thought it was HARD. For a downhill course, there sure is a lot of uphill. I had expected much more downhill and had trained mostly for that, but I wish I had done a lot more uphill training. Since reading other reviews, I took a pack and was glad I did since the aid stations were far apart. The people at the aide stations were very nice though. It was over 80F when I finished the marathon, and that heat and the hill between miles 18 and 22... man it was rough. I ran my 20 miles in just under 4 hours and felt great afterwards. This took me more or less the ENTIRE 5 hours and 30 min which I was not expecting... The course is beautiful, even though sometimes it smells like cow. All in all, glad I did it. Wouldn't have chosen it for a first marathon if I knew it would be THAT challenging. All 5 of us finished.
4.0

By: Karen M.

Posted: June 17, 2011

Lovely for a road marathon... need more aid

The race was well-organized and I felt like everything went very smoothly. The course is beautiful, as advertised, though a bit hillier than I expected (the smallish hills are dwarfed in the elevation profile by the large descent between miles 4 and 6-ish, but they seem a bit bigger when you're climbing up them). The aid station workers were enthusiastic, well-organized, and helpful. Really a nice race overall. My only real complaint is the spacing of the aid stations - as the temperature rose through the mid-70s, it would have been nice to have aid a little more frequently than every ~3 miles on the back end.
3.0

By: Dave E.

Posted: June 17, 2011

great little race

The most beautiful course I've ever run but know the only course support will be the aid stations. It's hard for spectators get get around the course so it's you and your fellow runners. I ran a lot of miles alone except when someone caught me or I caught someone which was fine for me. The scenery kept me occupied. While the course is downhill, there are a few strategically placed inclines which will be challenging. The variation was probably good for the quads. My advice would be to carry water. This was my first high altitude race and I was encourage at packet pick up to carry water and I'm glad I did. They could have used a few more water stops. I'm not sure why anyone would think the marathon catered to elite runners. I'm not an elite runner and didn't get that impression at all. If you're pushing the 6 hour time limit, the post race event may have been sparse but I thought the post race scene was very good, especially for a small race. If you like small marathons, give it a try. If you like big marathons, give it a try and you might prefer smaller races after running this marathon.
4.0

By: Nicole S.

Posted: June 08, 2011

Not for the faint of heart

This was a great marathon - but it wasn't the marathon for me. I had a feeling from reading the website that the marathon catered to more of an elite runner. Having only just over 360 runners in the marathon made it painfully obvious if you weren't a faster runner. That being said, the event itself was wonderful (despite my performance). The volunteers were great and very supportive. There could have been more restrooms at the bus pick-up. I found out later that there were more there, but most everybody was lined up behind the only one we saw. The shirts were fairly plain. If Steamboat wants more participation in the marathon, they should cater to regular athletes. If they want to make it an elite event, that should be noted more specifically on the website.
3.0

By: Jon T.

Posted: June 08, 2011

One of my favorite marathon experiences!

What a fantastic, small, marathon. There is really no expo to speak of, but packet pick up was a breeze. The transportation to the start was easy to access and the driver let us stay on the bus rather than stand around for an hour in the cold. The course is definitely a challenge. Some of the downhills are pretty extreme in the first half, and then the rolling hills in the second half are tough. However, this was all expected, so I'm not complaining! There was a huge swing in temperatures from start to finish (low 30's to mid 70's), so being able to check gear easily was nice. The aid stations are farther apart than usual for a marathon. The first one was at 3 miles, then there wasn't another one until almost mile 7! I carried a small bottle with me, and that helped a lot, but it would be nice to have a few more aid stations, especially when it got warm in the second half. There really are no spectators (other than the enthusiastic aid station volunteers!) until the last mile in town, and the field really thins out, so I ran about 25 miles pretty much by myself. However, I expected this and actually enjoy this kind of race. The course is incredibly beautiful! Finally, the town of Steamboat Springs was a great host for this event, and it's a nice place to hang out before and after the race. I would highly recommend this one.
5.0

By: Phil H.

Posted: June 07, 2011

Scenic and basic

This marathon has been around for a while now (this was year 30). It seems they have really nailed down some aspects, yet need work on a few others. The bussing to the start was great. Very well organized, easy to access and nice busses. The start and finish areas were well organized, and the bag-drop was nice. The course had several porto-potties which came in handy. As far as improvements; I did not get a t-shirt this year! Well, I could have gotten a mens XL, which is way too big or a small which wont work either. How hard is it to set aside the shirt for those who pre-registered? I arrived at the Expo on Saturday afternoon and there was nothing left? Now sure who was in charge of this, but I think its not acceptable. The course is tough - steep descents in the beginning and some really small rolling 'hills' in the 2nd half. Be prepared for a cold start but warming rapidly. Use the gear trucks! Overall, its basic and beautiful. If you like paved roads then you have it made. I prefer trails, but I knew this coming into the race. We had dinner at Riggio's the night before and would certainly recommend it (Lincoln and 11th Ave, I think).
3.0

By: Yali F.

Posted: July 07, 2010

Beautiful Race Needs More Water Stations

This was my 28th marathon. The fresh mountian air and scenery were memorable. Packet pickup was in a small ski lodge near downtown with friendly staff. At the expo, I asked about their plans to address the previous year's complaint about insufficient water stations, I was assured that the aid stations are up this year. I agree with other runners' comments that, at high altitude with 80+ degrees, the last few miles should have aid stations every half-mile, especially towards town in midday sun. One aid station had water cups laid on the ground. How about a foldable table or even tailgate? I was also surprised by lack of fruit pieces such as banana or oranges on the course. Other marathons with far more moderate temps and no elevation provided more drink and food aid stations. The race shirt was a cotton tee - pretty useless - while the nicer tech tee with better design asks for $20, and long-sleeve is even more. Why can't marathoners get the nicer tee? I haven't got a cotton tee in a long time in a marathon. Another big disappointment was the finish-line food, or lack thereof. I grabbed a brown "lunch" bag at the finish. When I dug into it, I found the "sandwich" was a gooey mess, and the cheap, white bread had become a paste in the hot sun. Were these made the night before? Totally inedible. There was no yogurt, juice, or sports drinks at the finish. Just bottled water. All in all, I think the race was great, CO is probably the most beautiful state in the lower 48, and while in town, I chanced upon the Friday night Art Walk, and met some local artists and had some nice snacks. Very friendly people. I found the local CO runners very fit and friendly.
4.0

By: John W.

Posted: June 11, 2010

Fantastic, scenic marathon, except...

This was my 35th marathon and was one of the best. It was the most scenic. The only problem is only having 10 aid/water stations over 26.2 miles. Most marathons have one every mile. With the temperatures over 80 near the end, water was badly needed for the last 6 to 8 miles. Why not have more stations during the last 8 miles, or give out bottles of water? If you carry a bottle, who wants to stop and fill it with 5-10 cups of water? Other than the lack of aid stations, everything else was close to perfect.
4.0

By: Dan E.

Posted: June 11, 2010

Be prepared and this one is awesome

This is a fantastic, scenic course. Steamboat is a great place to spend the weekend, and the race is very well organized and well run. The mile markers were accurate and the aid station workers and all volunteers were amazing. Thank you to all volunteers! This year the weather was pretty hot, so my warning to others is to prepare yourself. With only 10 aid stations, I chose to carry my own water bottle through the first half - and I'm glad I did. Also, you simply cannot train enough on hills to prep for this course. It is very challenging, so practice your hills. I was finishing the marathon while the half marathoners were still on the course and they were awesome about cheering me on. The spectators at the end were great and I had the time of my life. This is a top-notch event on a great course. Just be ready to make some adjustments depending on the weather.
4.0

By: Terry T.

Posted: June 07, 2010

HOT, HOT, HOT

First time at Steamboat. Most scenic course I've run, for sure. Helped me forget about the altitude, heat, and downhill slant. The only negatives: 1) The bus ride to Hahn's Peak was on a schoolbus. 2) No sliced fruit or sports drink at the end. 3) No race medals for the half runners. My wife and buddy were disappointed they didn't get medals. Let's not forget who finances our marathon... the 1,100 half runners.
3.0

By: Jon A.

Posted: August 05, 2009

Awesome

Beautiful town, with great scenery.
5.0

By: Matt K.

Posted: June 22, 2009

Best road marathon I've done

To those who want more schwag, or who complain because the full fanfare is not available after 5 hours, I would suggest either sticking with the "big box" marathons and stepping up your training. This is a top-notch event - best scenery ever, accurate mile markers, well stocked aid stations with enthusiastic and helpful volunteers, EMT's sprinkled throughout the course, and this year, perfect running weather. If you are a marathoner, you will love this race. I am not a "big road" marathon fan generally, but of the 4 road courses I have run, this one is the best, hands down.
5.0

By: Tim Harrington

Posted: June 11, 2009

Beautiful

Steamboat is a beautiful run down a mountain valley. The majority of the course is run on a country road beside a rolling river and through mountain ranches with beautiful views. There is not much crowd support along the course, so if you need the support of a crowd then choose another marathon. If you want to run with a few other runners and enjoy the scenery along the way, you will not find to many marathons better than Steamboat. The course is mostly a long downhill with some late-mile climbing. Besides the light drizzle throughout the first half of the marathon, and a strong headwind along the finishing stretch, the running conditions were ideal. This is my 3rd time running Steamboat and I deliberately ran without a watch to soak in the surroundings. The experience was my most rewarding marathon to date. I beat my goal time by a minute and would strongly encourage such an approach for most runners. Marathons are so tough physically, mentally and emotionally that removing the persistent need to stay on pace was refreshing. Steamboat was the ideal backdrop to clear the mind and enjoy the whole run. Okay, running the last 1.5 miles into the cold headwind was pretty draining, but I'll take that on my way to Boston in April. Love LIFE, Tim
4.0

By: Ken O.

Posted: June 09, 2009

Don't forget us back-of-the-packers!

We all know it's a beautiful town and a beautiful course. Overall I had a very good time. Nice restaurants + nice town + good people = a fine experience. But being asked to leave a comment here invariably leads to the discussions of what could be better - it's the nature of the beast. And mine involve the trials and tribulations of the back-of-the-pack runner. I've been coming up for the Steamboat HALF Marathon since 1998, but this year was my first attempt at the FULL. It took me that long because of their intimidating 5 1/2 hour finish time requirement - I didn't want to get thrown off of the course.... So, after training enough to finally finish in the required time, I approached the finish line this year in 5:16. My 5-year-old son jumped off of the curb, joined me for the last 50 yards, and we crossed the finish line together, smiling and holding hands. But the official Brightroom race photographer was nowhere to be found, so I get no finish line picture of this special day? I was told that he had left 15 minutes earlier because he was "wet." (?) So was I. What a disappointment. Can we not assume that if we MUST finish within 5 1/2 hours, the support staff will stay AT LEAST that long as well? Last time I checked, I didn't get a discounted fee for alternate accommodations... Perhaps these notes should also go directly to this professional photographer. Since I was certainly not last to finish, I can safely say there's many of us who would gladly chip in to buy him a sturdier poncho so we, too, could have the irreplaceable memories that the faster runners take for granted. A quick note about the aid stations, too: I realize the weather got bad. This year, we slower runners really took some extra abuse from Mother Nature. Anyway, as my faster friend waited at the finish area for me in his warm hoodie, I was slogging up the notorious mile 22/23 hill in blinding rain, sleet and hail. Watching an aid station fold up its tent and scurry out of the elements as I trudged by was very deflating. I needed water (and more) in the worst way. Changing gears, though: A BIG "thank you" to the one kind soul (I believe part of the race crew) who drove up and offered me a poncho - he might have saved me from a DNF. So yes, there were angels out there, too. Just some honest comments - about real experiences - in case anyone wanted to read them. I sent them directly to the race director, too, but so far no reply. I'll definitely be back - there's always next year....
3.0

By: Doug M.

Posted: June 08, 2009

Be prepared

It would seem that this race is one where you need to be prepared for the unexpected. Last time I ran it, it was a nice, warm day - but with one no-show aid station, which led to dehydration. This year featured some unexpected bad weather (rain, hail, strong headwinds). It is in the mountains, so the weather "forecast" is somewhat less accurate. (If there is any rain in the forecast, tuck a folded garbage bag into the back of your shorts for an emergency "hail/raincoat.") The traffic management is unfathomable on this race (my opinion). Mostly very good; for most of the race, they had one lane blocked, and what little traffic there was had a lead vehicle to escort these cars through at a safe speed. Then all heck broke loose. For awhile, there was two-way traffic (I hoped to hell that they could see me through the rain?), no shoulder to run on, and no safety cones to provide a running lane. You had to hope that the cars swerved into the other lane to get around you, which they did unless there was traffic coming the other way (in which case they tended to cut it pretty close). The last miles had a wide running lane with safety cones, but lots of traffic and road noise. Subway came through again with delicious turkey or vegetarian subs for finishers. This is a great town and great race; they just need to be a little extra prepared for the unexpected.
3.0

By: DEBBIE E.

Posted: October 16, 2008

NOT THAT HILLY, BUT NO SCHWAG

This was my first marathon. I was expecting more out of the packet pickup area. The race organization was great. The course was great. Plenty of water stops with plenty of food. I was expecting a little more at the end, such as refreshments. With this race being the 25th anniversary, it was a little bit of a letdown.
4.0

By: ken whitener

Posted: July 09, 2008

a pleasant course

This was the 1st race I ran during a "3 marathons in 3 weeks" road trip that I took in June. The course is scenic and provides views to take your mind off of the fatigue you might feel at certain miles. It was in the low 40's at the start, but quickly warmed up after about an hour, and by the time I finished (4:23 later), it was in the mid 80's, with no clouds in the sky, and with the sun beating down - wear sunscreen for sure!!! I had no trouble with the spacing of water stations, but I could see how it could affect some people. It was really relaxing running along the river at certain points - the sound of running water is always soothing! I also enjoyed the cows as they watched us runners run past their fields. Although there are some hills, there are only 2 big ones that did any damage that I could remember - one at about mile 3, which was about a half-mile long, and another at about mile 22, which was about a mile long. My goal was just to break 5 hours, since I come from Chicago and am not used to the elevation (8,100 feet at the start, 7,000 at the finish) or the hills. I still ran a 4:23, and felt fairly decent afterward. Compare that to a flat course at sea level in Port Angeles, Washington, on which I ran a 4:12. But, maybe since it was my first race at Steamboat, I was more prepared for it. If you haven't run it, I think you will enjoy this scenic mountain course to put on your resume!!
4.0

By: Steve MacDonald

Posted: June 25, 2008

great race, but difficult

I thought this race was great for the scenery; the weather was good; and it was in a cool location. The hills are a little brutal at halfway and mile 22. Water stations could have been closer together. All in all, I had an awesome time. Spectators are plentiful near the finish. I would do it again. Do not expect a PR here.
4.0

By: Don Pattison

Posted: June 05, 2008

BRING YOUR OWN WATER

Beautiful course, with lots of twists and turns in the roads - and don't forget the hills (mountains to us flat-landers). There is a "hill" about mile 3 to 4 that can really set the type of race you will have. The water stop with Larry the camel was nice; it gave me a change to really slow down and take a break. Bring sunscreen because you will likely need it. Most importantly, bring your own water. The biggest complaint I'd have is the water stops were too few and too far between. The first one was at mile 3 and the next one was about mile 6.5 so they were right at the extreme distance for a race. All of the folks were great and helpful. We had perfect weather for sunbathing, as it did get in the upper 70's low 80's during the race, and clear skies with no clouds at all (I was praying for clouds). I ended up with sunburn in places that haven't seen the sun all winter long.
4.0

By: Sara W.

Posted: July 13, 2007

Dehydration anyone???

While there are good things to say about the beautiful scenery... scenery is overrated when you are dehydrated and cannot stop thinking about if the next water station will be there or not! Everyone will say, "Bring your own water!" BUT when I pay good money to run a race, I expect water. A simple request. Also, the RUMORS that this a downhill marathon have got to end. Though I know the elevation chart is accurate, this marathon is anything but downhill. Do not expect a fast time. On a positive note, I did appreciate the cold towels at the finish line, and the spectators were great there too.
3.0

By: Doug M.

Posted: June 09, 2007

Contingency planning needed

This was a great run but with one major flub-up: A missing water station meant running ~ 6 miles with no water. Everything I've read suggests once you get dehydrated, you're pretty much done for. And 6 the waterless miles plus warm weather at the end of the race seemed enough to do just that. The excuse given was that the aid station team "didn't show up." How about some sort of contingency planning... couldn't they have at least dropped off some self-service water and a stack of cups? While the course is beautiful, spectators aren't to be expeceted (or really even necessary) on this remote and pristine course. Steamboat is a great place where you'll see real ranchers mixed in with visitors. For a unique treat, drive up to the beautiful Strawberry Hot Springs facility (clothing optional after dark)... a great pre-race day relaxation treat. And, try Cuginos for great Italian food. Speaking of food, thank you to Subway for providing turkey subs at the finish!
3.0

By: Travis B.

Posted: June 05, 2007

Beautiful, but one big negative.

Course was incredibly beautiful, while rather brutal. This was expected. The lack of an aid station between miles 3 and 10 was not! There was supposed to be an aid station at 6.5 miles. While not a dealbreaker, it did enchance the difficulty of an already challenging course. Saw plenty of runners drop like flies in the second half of the race. Would do it again for the sheer beauty of the course and the great volunteers who did show up. I will carry some of my own liquid aid next time!
4.0

By: Patricia W.

Posted: June 04, 2007

The course is beautiful and scenic.

There are not enough aid stations, especially in the early miles. Bring your own water bottle for this race.
4.0

By: Jonathan G.

Posted: June 04, 2007

A beautiful, high-altitude road marathon

Plusses: - The course is visually magnificent. It starts at about ~8,100 feet above sea level, and winds down a vally past peaks, alpine meadows, streams, and old farms to Steamboat Springs at 6,700 feet; - Very well organized. Good water/Gaterade/gel stations, transportaion worked well, nice volunteers; - The first 4-5 miles is on a nice downhill pitch, which causes confidence to soar... (but see my negatives). Negatives: - First, no negatives. This is a great race. These are more warnings: - Don't get fooled by the speed on the first 4-5 miles. The course slows down, and if you go out to quickly, you will die. I saw a lot of walking dead (full disclosure: I was on the brink of joining this group) in the last 6 miles that I had seen sprint out ahead, more so than usual; - As you should expect for a rural course, not a lot of spectators. But, the scenery more than makes up for it.
4.0

By: Mel M.

Posted: December 22, 2006

Lonely road with beautiful vistas

Not surprisingly, there is very little "crowd" support. Until the last 1/2 mile in town, you may see more cows/horses than people, but that is part of the attraction. The starting area is like a big club run, with everyone mingling and trying to stay warm until the start. Very casual. The course profile looks like a lot of downhill, but it rolls, so don't expect long stretches of relief. Steamboat in June can be truly beautiful, and the marathon can make for an enjoyable addition to a vacation.
3.0

By: Bonnie M.

Posted: August 08, 2006

Great Small-Town Race

Steamboat is a great and challenging race. The race was well organized and the course was beautiful. Lucky for this flat-lander, there were a lot of declines to cruise down. The volunteers were great and still out and energetic. The last 6 miles were very hot, so THANKS to the volunteer who wrapped ice in my bandana during the last few miles! After drinking what seemed to be gallons of Gatorade, I finished in six hours. A big thanks to everyone! By the way, when they say the cut-off time is six hours, they mean it. There was no food left and the finish line and tents were just about down. This time I didn't care; I found shade and took a nap.
4.0

By: Francisco G.

Posted: June 14, 2006

Great course, great race!

I included this race as part of my Colorado vacation. It was a little tougher than I thought. Even after spending a week at 8K ft and climbing to 12, 13 and 14k ft twice I found myself breathing really hard just to maintain a moderate pace on that hilly course. As the others have mentioned, the event was well organized, I just wished there had been a few more water stations to compensate for the warm and dry weather.
4.0

By: Gail M.

Posted: June 12, 2006

Fantastic!!

I ran the half marathon, so I only got to enjoy the last half of the course. The scenery was fantastic and the runners were all very friendly. We made this part of our summer vacation and I would suggest that for anyone. I am hoping to make this an annual race!
4.0

By: Kathleen H.

Posted: June 08, 2006

Most beautiful course I have ever run!!!

Steamboat Springs!! What an amazing little town in the summer. The course was just magnificant and it almost made me want to run slower so it would last longer! I didn't even mind the hills.... Thank you to the race staff for such a great experience. Just wish there was a medal at the end!! How about adding a small race expo? That would be nice, too.
5.0

By: David Reinhart

Posted: June 07, 2006

Beautiful Course, Well Organized

Like others have said previously: the altitude has a big affect the low-landers like myself. Even with a gentle easy pace, I noticed myself breathing hard (like I was pushing myself). This year was also hot and sunny. I got sun-burned bad so don't forget the sun block! I was impressed with how well organized the race was. I see often on smaller races poor organization, but they did well and still kept that small-town touch to it. This is a great race to couple with a vacation. If I lived close I would make it an annual event.
4.0

By: m. b.

Posted: June 06, 2006

Remains most scenic marathon, but difficult

WOW! Scenic, beautiful course - one of my favorites of all races... but watch out for those rolling hills! Certainly not a PR course, but don't let that stop you from running this great race. Small field of runners offers you the opportunity to enjoy the views in silence; not many spectators - so you have plenty of "alone time." GREAT ORGANIZATION, small-town feel, challenging but beautiful course, friendly volunteers... deep awards by local artists is a GREAT TOUCH! RUN THIS RACE IN 2007!!!
4.0

By: Arthur Anton

Posted: December 05, 2005

GORGEOUS... but flatlanders BEWARE!!!

RESPECT... is what this race demands from us normal marathoners. This baby has to go down as one of the most scenic race experiences on the planet, but altitude, hills, and weather will sting the unwary. This is a race dominated by Colorado and other Rocky Mountain marathoners, and no wonder... those of us from the flatlands don't have the same backyards to play in, so preparing for low O2 and all the ups and downs can be a challenge. On top of everything, the weather can vary wildly from year to year... blazing hot one year, snowing the next. The scenic allure of this event sucked me in the fist time, but I didn't prepare well... crashed and burned, worst time ever, altitude sickness, the whole works!! With a score to settle, I went back again, but prepared... armed for battle, I returned a much better time and experience. A third visit returned even better. Bottom line, I love the challenge and beauty of this event... I'll be heading back for a fourth event soon.
4.0

By: jacquelina m.

Posted: July 05, 2005

Brutal! No O2 for this low-lander!!!

I thought the course was beautiful! I loved the weather! I do not need a lot of spectators so the quiet countryside was fine for me. The spectators that were there were great and so were the volunteers at the water stations. I would have liked some more info before the race. I went back to Christy Sports twice for questions to be answered that were not in the literature. My only problem with this course was that there was not enough O2 in the air for me. I felt the air difference in Denver already just walking (5,000 ft) so the 8000-6700ft. With rolling hills t/o was brutal… the whole way. From start (yes, that hill at 8000 ft that I walked) to the end… I could not breathe! And that was from start to finish! It was a walk/run marathon for me resulting in my worst time out of 7 marathons. I have never seen so many walkers in a marathon! I guess it was all us low-landers! I am just glad I finished! The good part about having to run so slowly is that my body had very few aches/pains or injuries after.
5.0

By: joseph h.

Posted: June 11, 2005

scenic, but hot and hilly

I ran the half and would recommend it over the full, mostly due to the high altitude heat. I think steamboat is a great 'destination' and a pretty cute town and I would recommend this over a number of other races but would not state that it was epic or stellar, only noteworthy. The course is nice and rolling but the marathon is tough. The long awaited towels at the finish were dry instead of wet and cold... bummer. Schwag could also be improved upon - there was none.
4.0

By: Paul B.

Posted: June 11, 2005

Beautiful course. Good first marathon.

Very scenic route. The start of the race was a little unorganized. I was surprised when the gun sounded. First half of the course is mainly downhill and many people went out too fast. Best to save some strength for the more difficult second half. The aid stations were fairly well placed and had good organization. There was a lot of traffic on the road in the last couple of miles before the turn on to Lincoln. They should close off a lane. The finish was great with a large group of spectators. Steamboat is a great town; everyone is very friendly.
4.0

By: DAVID HURLEY

Posted: June 07, 2005

Scenic Course Helped the Pain a Little

It really takes a village to pull off a marathon. Thanks to all the volunteers who worked together to make the marathon successful. Having completed 42 marathons, Steamboat is at the top as far as beauty. The pasta dinner was delicious. The bus ride to the start of the race was as relaxing as could be expected. The cold washcloths at the end of the marathons felt sooooooooo good. A special touch was the finishing card with my time and place. As this was my 4th marathon since January, my legs were tired. Thanks to all the friendly runners who talked and laughed with me along the way. A special thanks to a CO runner who would not let me stop until the next cone. He was having severe cramps and I was just old and tired. We were attempting to run to one cone and then walk to the next one in order to reach the finish line. The finish-line crowd was just as enthusiastic as Boston's, just smaller.
4.0

By: michael montano

Posted: June 07, 2005

Good race; good org., keep up the good work

I ran this event in 1987 and 1988. Finished in 2:40 both times, 4th place in'87; 6th place in '88. This was one of the most memorable races that I have run. In both cases, the organization was great. Pre-race activities, as well as post-race activities were exceptional. As I finished each race, I felt like a star when the crowd greeted me at the finish line. The overhead banner really added to the special accomplishment each runner felt. I saw that the winning time of the 2005 race was 2:41. This made me feel even better about my 2:40 times of '87, '88!!!!
5.0

By: Ben R.

Posted: June 16, 2004

Tougher the second time

This is the second time I've run this marathon and the hot weather and hills proved to make this year much tougher. Still had fun. Just remember, even with the down hill, don't go out too fast or you'll really pay in the second half (I speak from experience). Beautiful course. Great place to visit.
4.0

By: Jeff O.

Posted: June 10, 2004

Great location, great marathon

Can't beat the scenery, tough course but very rewarding. I hit the wall at 20 miles, the start of the last uphill, but was able to rally with the help of some strategically placed fans. Will run again next year (with CamelBack).
5.0

By: Lisa Holdway

Posted: June 07, 2004

Challenging and Awesome!

What a race! Definitely a challenging run at altitude down and up and through Steamboat's beautiful countryside. Although many were in the race to compete, all partcipants were supportive of even the least talented runner. We all start from somewhere right? Team in Training philanthropists were everywhere in their purple shirts and in their fundraising efforts raised over $250,000 for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society - way to GO TEAM!
4.0

By: Stuart Siegler

Posted: June 07, 2004

Very hard, with some nice touches

The course elevation graphic does not reflect the actual course. While it looks majorly downhill, in reality the drops are steeper, and the rises are longer then I expected. Very pretty, and good support, but the altitude is quite hard on the lungs. 2004 saw temps into the 80's and that added tothe difficulty. Nice touch #1: On crossing the finish line, they gave us a cold (icy) wet towel, and Nice touch #2: As you got your medal, handed you a finisher's card, with your time, place, rank, etc., on it. Beware of the speed trap after ascending Rabbit Ears Pass, where the downhill speed goes from 65 to 50.
3.0

By: Steve F.

Posted: June 07, 2004

Great location, tough race.

Just ran this race yesterday and for me it was by far the toughest marathon that I have run. Early temperatures were pleasant but it was quite hot by the last third of the run. I found the downhills at the beginning to be less of a challenge than I was expecting and the uphill at mile 20-23 was much tougher. For recreational runners, can't think of a worse place to have a long uphill than right when you are 'hitting the wall'. The elevation also affected me more than I thought it would. The volunteers at the aid stations were enthusiastic but the stations were too spread out, particularly in the last half of the run. There seemed to be plenty of water and Gatorade, but apparently no ice, despite all the water I did drink, I never once was given a drink that was really cold. The ice towels at the end of the run were a nice touch, just wish some of that ice could have been distributed over the course. Race organization was good, transportation to the start was easy, plenty of porta-potties, and well-run finishing area. Overall, I would recommend a visit to Steamboat in June; the area is absolutely beautiful - I'll go back for a visit, but I won't run this race again.
4.0

By: Ben R.

Posted: June 04, 2003

Great race, tough course, will be back next year.

Just completed this race - my first marathon - 3 days ago. Coming from the Midwest, the altitude and the hills were tough to adjust to. Fortunately, I listened to others' postings from previous years and didn't get too carried away on the early downhills, so I had a little left (very little) for the hills at 20-23. The weather didn't cooperate fully this year either, with about the first 8 miles in 40-degree weather and driving rain. Overall, even with a tough course and rain, this was an excellent experience that I will do again. The course scenery was beautiful. The race was well organized and the spectators were really awesome. Of course, with only 500 in the marathon, there were less spectators than at a big race, but there were many throughout the course all cheering you on the whole way, and the last 3/4 of a mile was lined with people all lending encouragement.
5.0

By: Matt E.

Posted: June 03, 2003

Downhill takes away your kick

This course is very perplexing. It sounds so easy with the huge downhill, however you will find that when you are on your second half, unless you are a running god, you will find it hard to have a good kick after the uphill on miles 20-23. I ran this race two days ago, and I need a new set of quads! I was setting a PR for the first 13 miles, and then pfffffft, forget about it! However, after starting this race in 40 degree rain, and running with trashbags on my body, I finished, and will sign up again. Great organization, and if you don't like to feel crowded, this is your race.
4.0

By: Gina B.

Posted: February 07, 2003

Great if you like downhill!

This was my first marathon and I found it very enjoyable (as enjoyable as you can find a marathon).The long downhill for the first half helped me make good time, but was punishing on my legs by the time I hit 20. Would have liked more fan support, in that they gave me that charge for the last mile when they finally appeared. Overall, great race, and I thought well organized.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: September 24, 2002

Awesome but Tough Course!

Unfortunately, this was my first marathon. I only say unfortunately, because this course is way too high and way too hilly for a first! I had a very similar experience to the post from 'A runner from Atlanta, GA (6/8/02)'. The downhills in the first half wiped me out and consequently, the second half was VERY UGLY! Crowd support is virtually non-existent, but the course is gorgeous! Because Steamboat is such an awesome destination and a great place to visit, I would still recommend this marathon, just not for a first!
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 08, 2002

It's a challenge!!!!

Being from the East coast, I thought my main obstacle would be breathing at 8,000+ ft....wrong...the downhill sections at the beginning took a lot out of my legs for the end. The course is beautiful...carved out of the Colorado countryside border by farms...the spectators are horses and cows and the occasional human. I began the race at a comfortable 8:45 pace hoping to break 4 hours....wrong again. The 1st half came in at 1:57 the 2nd half...that is another story. Overall, this is a great race...coming from the East coast does add a dimension of difficulty probably not experienced by a local. Run this race...but I don't think you will get a PR.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 04, 2002

Absolutley fantastic!

This course deserves it's reputation for beauty - I rank it as a very close second to Big Sur. And it is also almost as tough as Big Sur because of the terrain. The overall elevation gain is negative, but there are hills. Found the downhill to be more taxing than the uphill especially later in the race. Great organization, plenty of water stations (wonderful volunteers) and porta potties along the route. Only a few pockets of spectators until you reach the finish, but who needs the streets lined with a crowd with the river, trees, and wildflowers to cheer you on. The finish line is in downtown Steamboat and they have created a festive atmosphere. The marathon is limited to 500 runners so sign up in advance as it fills.
5.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: August 16, 2001

Beautiful Course!

The organization was superb and the setting couldn't be better. The course is predominately downhill, but there is a good uphill on mile 3 and 20-23. If you are a flatlander, beware, the course starts at approx 8500 ft. The few spectators are concentrated at the finish line. The post-race massage is a plus.
4.0

By: Anonymous

Posted: June 07, 2000

Scenic and peaceful

The countryside of northern Colorado is stunning and if you're after peace, quiet, and scenery, this is the marathon for you. Unfortunately, the narrow country road isn't totally closed to traffic so it takes a little away from the peace and quiet part, but the scenery makes up for it. Unlike last year were it snowed before the start, this year the temperature ranged from mid 50's at the start to 85 at the finish...be prepared to run in any condition. The marathon was very well organized and the packet pick up was easy to find and quick to get through. Buses picked us up in the morning and dropped us off at the starting point. There were plenty of porta-johns at the start and half-marathon site but few in between. My only complaint would be the lack of water stations although they all had Gatorade and most had Power Gels available. For the first 16 miles they were spaced 3-3.5 miles apart, which may not be so bad if you're used to the altitude, dry mountain air, and if the weather would have been cooler. Unfortunately, being a 'flat-lander' I was parched by mile 6 and made sure to drink as much as possible. I would suggest carrying your own water if you plan to run this marathon. The course is challenging with the majority of the large hills within the first 6 miles, the rest gently rolling. Post-race was small with plenty of water, Gatorade and munchies readily available. You were also handed a card with your finishing time and overall place just minutes after finishing. If you're a 'flat-lander' and you decide to do a marathon in Colorado the altitude is something you should take into consideration. I ran the marathon within 24 hours of arrival and had no ill effects. I never felt out of breath while running but could tell I wasn't in my 'element'...in this case, hot & humid & smoggy air. Over all this was a good experience and I'm planning on running more marathons in this area in the near future.
5.0
Write a review

Marathon Guide

Privacy Policy

Calendars

US/CanadaInternational MarathonsRace SearchWorld Marathon Majors

All rights reserved. Copyright © 2025 Marathon Guide