|
|
 |
Marathon Directory
|
 |
|
|
Museum of Aviation Foundation Marathon Runner Comments
|
| Number of comments: 71 [displaying comments 51 to 61] | More Comments: [ < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > ] |
Average Ratings: Course -
Organization -
Fans -
|
|
A fun and rewarding marathon experience (about: 2005)
Course: 5
Organization: 4
Fans: 1
S. I. from Nashville, Tennessee (1/18/05)
4-5 previous marathons
| 1 Museum of Aviation Foundation Marathon
This was my fourth marathon overall and the first actual double-loop marathon I have run. I found it much easier to gauge myself for a negative split on this course. The extremely small number of participants left me running alone for almost the entire race, but I train alone and quite enjoy the solitude. Running on the air force base is interesting, with a lot of different sights to see in the 13-mile loop, including lakes, wetlands, a golf course, plenty of buildings and hangars, and military housing. I wasn't bored with the run, so the scenery was just fine.
This year, there was a pretty strong head/crosswind for the first 7 miles, and on a double loop, that means miles 14-21 are also going to be windy, so I am sure that times were slower as a result. I was a little confused at the finish line because I had to fill out my own time card and there were no real refreshments available right there, so I got in my car, drove back to my hotel, and showered and ate there before returning for the award ceremony. This being the case, I felt that the race organization was a little lacking. The race organizers did invest in lots of awards, so I imagine nearly every runner got something more than a shirt and a finisher's medal for the effort. All told, the venue is quite pleasant, the race is plenty of fun if you like a small race, and Warner Robins is a pretty nice little town to visit. I definitely recommend it to someone looking for a good January marathon.
|
Very Enjoyable Experience (about: 2005)
Course: 5
Organization: 5
Fans: 5
K. P. from Tifton, GA (1/18/05)
4-5 previous marathons
| 2 Museum of Aviation Foundation Marathons
Friendly, helpful volunteers. Great course. Nice venue. I live in Tifton, 80 miles south and we bring a crew of 8-10 every year. We love having a good race close by. I only ran the half, plan on the marathon next year.
|
Great Job! (about: 2005)
Course: 3
Organization: 5
Fans: 2
Mark Long from North Carolina (1/16/05)
50+ previous marathons
This was my 60th marathon. I was very pleased with the organization and race facilities. It was a fantastic course if you don?t mind double loops. By the way, I don?t mind double loops. Let?s face it, 26.2 miles is 26.2 miles no matter where or what you run. My thanks go to all the many volunteers and race officials that made this event possible.
|
Great course for a PR (about: 2004)
Course: 2
Organization: 3
Fans: 3
T. L. from Alabama, USA (10/20/04)
1 previous marathon
| 1 Museum of Aviation Foundation Marathon
I ran this for my FIRST marathon. I did well (3:35) even with leisurely stops. I was unhappy with the supplies available for the finishers because very few drinks and nutritious food were available during the oncoming 'chill' and 'shock' that a finisher's body goes through. I was expected to PAY 50 cents for a cup of coffee at the finish area!!!
|
A no-nonsense event (General Comments)
Course: 4
Organization: 4
Fans: 2
R. R. from Atlanta (7/9/04)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 Museum of Aviation Foundation Marathon
Have run the marathon, half-marathon, and 5K. All three years it was cold and windy, so be prepared. Had my worse marathon time, but that had nothing to do with the course (just tired from work). Course is fairly flat and uninteresting. Though there are sufficient aid stations, you are pretty much on your own. Great registration/warm-up area. Staff and participants are very nice. I liked the races there because there really aren't too many races around that time of year and it gives one motivation to stay fit through Christmas and early winter.
|
good marathon, great staff (about: 2004)
Course: 4
Organization: 4
Fans: 2
M. G. from Chattanooga, Tn (1/22/04)
Enjoyed the course, even though it was a double loop. Very scenic. Little traffic control for the slower runners on the second loop of the race.
|
Nice small marathon (about: 2004)
Course: 3
Organization: 4
Fans: 2
J. K. from Georgia (1/12/04)
This is a very small marathon with a somewhat larger half-marathon, both of which start together. The loop course, which is run twice for the full marathon, is flat with a few gentle rolls and one significant hill at 10.25 (and thus again at 23.25). While certainly not highly scenic, much of the course has a pleasant rural character and the surface is generally pretty good.
Aid stations are every two miles and all offer water and Gatorade; some also have orange sections and perhaps a few other food items, but I was just interested in fluids. All miles are well marked and measurement seems accurate but splits are not called. This is a good event for those who aren't into the hype of mega-marathons and don't need a big crowd. If you're faster than 3:15, be prepared to go it on your own the second loop.
|
An enjoyable small race (about: 2004)
Course: 5
Organization: 4
Fans: 1
J. B. from Auburn, AL (1/12/04)
This was a very enjoyable and well organized little race. The museum was open and set up to accommodate the runners before the race so you could stay warm right up until the start. The bathroom lines were never too bad, and there were porta-potties with almost no line available outside. The race course itself was mainly flat with only a few short hills - definitely a PR course. I thought the course was well marked and had no problem finding my way. Water stations were every 2 miles as advertised, with Gatorade at several of the stations.
Post-race, there were plenty of baked goods to munch on, with food and chairs set up in the museum. Trophies were given to the top three in overall, masters, and age group categories, so I think nearly everyone got an award. Sweatshirts and medals were quite nice.
The only negative about this race: There was only one porta-potty on the race course, so most runners were having to use the bushes.
|
This is a 'must do marathon' for all runners. (about: 2004)
Course: 5
Organization: 5
Fans: 4
Ronald Bucy from Bridgeport, West Virginia (1/11/04)
Wow! What a nice marathon. The marathon staff was well organized, extremely nice, and made my day. The course is great for all levels of marathoners. Well staffed water stops, nice facilities to start and finish. This was my first visit and completely enjoyed the experience. I sure can't criticize anything and the weather was fantastic. I sure know what southern hospitality means now!!!
Thanks for a wonderful weekend.
|
Worthwhile marathon to run (about: 2004)
Course: 4
Organization: 5
Fans: 3
Ivan Levinrad from Savannah, GA (1/11/04)
This is a marathon for those that enjoy a smaller race. the organization is excellent, the volunteers are all extremely friendly. It has a small-town feel. The sweatshirt [fleece-lined] is lovely - a nice touch. the medals and trophies are very nice too. The course is a double-loop with very little support but interestingly enough I found it very pretty, different and peaceful. The occasional plane taking off added some interest and excitement. Prepare for the cold wind on the route - if you dress appropriately you will be fine. The museum is definitely worth visiting -maginificent and interesting.
THANK YOU ORGANIZERS - WELL DONE.
|
| More Comments: [ < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > ] |
| |
|
|


|