MarathonGuide.com Logo - Marathon Directory, Marathons, Marathon Results, News and More Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor Contact Us
Tell a Friend

Site Map
May 23, 2013
 Marathon Directory

 TRC Post Oak Lodge Trail Marathon Runner Comments
Back to TRC Post Oak Lodge Trail Marathon Information & Comments
Number of comments: 14 [displaying comments 11 to 14]More Comments: [ < 1 2 > ]
Average Ratings: Course - Organization - Fans -

Great race if you value scenery but not race time (about: 2010)
Course: 3 Organization: 3 Fans: 1
D. P. from Brookfield, WI (3/1/10)
11-50 previous marathons | 1 TRC Post Oak Lodge Trail Marathon

If you are one of those ultra-serious, BQ-minded runners who rates courses based on finishing time, then avoid this course. If you value scenery and camaraderie, and you have a great sense of adventure and humor, this might be your race.

This was an inaugural race, so you always expect a few snafus because a lot of details go into making a successful race. It was also a trail marathon, which means you can expect to add at least half-hour to your normal finishing time. But I think it took me about 17 miles before I came to the realization of just how absurd this race was and that you just had to laugh about it. The course wandered all over the place like a drunken goat! There were few places where you weren't going either up or down, or turning left or right. At several points I remember running one way while seeing people running back and forth in a different direction - either nearby or off into the distance. Even though they were in throwing distance, you had no clue what mile of the race they were on! It was a beautiful, sunny day, but it wasn't enough to dry out all of the muddy sections that sucked at your heels throughout the course. Both of my feet were completely soaked. There were also several sections where sharp, jagged rocks dominated the trail, looking to trip up inattentive or fatigued runners. A couple of runners told me that they fell half a dozen times, and I personally witnessed a few face plants.

They did a good job of marking the course with orange/black ribbons about every 20 paces, but the two front runners missed seeing the orange plates directing them to the left across the field in front of the lodge around the first three quarters of a mile. They kept going straight along an easy access road, not bothering to wonder why they weren't seeing path markers for over a quarter-mile, and then stepping over the orange tape lying across the path as an obvious sign that meant "don't go this way." You could see it was from a path joining in from the left, but this course was so confusing - who knew which was the right way to go? About a dozen kept going after the front pair, but the rest of us back-tracked the quarter-mile to spot the orange plates and got back on course. It eventually got us back to that orange tape (only this time on the proper side of it, with no confusion about which direction to go). A few miles further on, when I was climbing up to the top of a steep hill (which gives a nice view of downtown Tulsa), a runner coming back down the hill said his GPS gave him 5.6 miles (the hill top should have been around 4.75 miles) - so the confusion in the first mile probably added around three quarters of a mile to my marathon. I don't think GPS takes into account elevation changes, so I would have been over 26.2 regardless, even without the detour. It would have been impossible to use a wheel to measure this course.

They really maximized the use of their aid stations. You run into the Botanical Garden station five times, and a few times into the other two stations. Since it seemed like they were sparse on volunteers, this was a good thing. They really could have used a few course marshals at some of the places where people could get easily confused. I did see some sentries the second time around on some of these loops, so maybe some of the volunteers werent early risers. This course was like some twisted mystery novel that I was determined to follow to the end. I knew where it was going to finish  I just didn't know how I was going to get there.

Eventually it took me two hours longer than my normal finishing time to complete this course. I finished a 50K trail race in snow faster than this marathon, which gives you an idea of the course conditions. The finisher shirt design was rather drab, but I like long-sleeve tech shirts, so it's a keeper. The medal is big (four inches), but sorry, I think it's ugly. Good chili at finish. Having runners email their stories and including the compilation of them printed out in the race packet was really a neat idea and made for enjoyable reading on the way home.


Good Challenge (about: 2010)
Course: 4 Organization: 4 Fans: 2
J. S. from Omaha, NE (2/28/10)
11-50 previous marathons | 1 TRC Post Oak Lodge Trail Marathon

This was my 30th marathon and this trail race was by far my slowest despite placing well. Lots of twists and turns and a few tough hills. There were regular sections that were very muddy and sloppy because of rains during the week before the race. If it had been dry, the times wouldn't have been so slow, but still a tough course. I'd never fallen before in a race, but I fell twice because of tripping over rocks. Organization was pretty good for a first-time race. This is not your typical marathon, but I really enjoyed it.


tough trail marathon (about: 2010)
Course: 3 Organization: 5 Fans: 2
C. C. from MS (2/28/10)
50+ previous marathons | 1 TRC Post Oak Lodge Trail Marathon

I am not a trail marathoner and this was a tough run for me. It had been wet and the trails were soggy. It was amazing how the director had put so many trails into such a compact area. It would have been nice to have mile markers. There were no spectators, but how could there be in this area? The aid stations were well stocked and the people there were great!


Long Day (about: 2010)
Course: 3 Organization: 5 Fans: 1
D. S. from South Dakota (2/28/10)
50+ previous marathons | 1 TRC Post Oak Lodge Trail Marathon

This is a typical trail marathon in a relatively small space. Lots of loops and switchbacks. It's possible to get confused, but if you pay attention, you ought to get from point A to point B. It's a rocky course in parts, so if you look up you are going to fall down.

This race will take you a long time to finish. The going is simply slow in large parts of the course.

I can say that I've never run a race in a nature preserve that had pumping oil wells. Only in Oklahoma.

Well staffed and very good aid stations. Decent after-race lunch. People were nice and overall organization was good.


More Comments: [ < 1 2 > ]

 

Bookmark and Share
 Some Ads










Like MarathonGuide.com on Facebook

Follow @MarathonGdotcom on Twitter


All material Copyright ©2000-2013 Web Marketing Associates (WMA). All rights Reserved.
Please Contact Us for more information.

WMA makes no representations as to the accuracy of information on this site or its suitability for any use. | privacy policy | refund policy