|
|
 |
Marathon Directory
|
 |
|
|
Charlottesville Marathon Runner Comments
|
| Number of comments: 223 [displaying comments 201 to 211] | More Comments: [ < 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > ] |
Average Ratings: Course -
Organization -
Fans -
|
|
Tough course, but scenic. (about: 2004)
Course: 3
Organization: 3
Fans: 3
T. S. from NJ (4/20/04)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 Charlottesville Marathon
I found the course to be one of the toughest I have ever run. The area was beautiful though. If you like hills, then this is the marathon to run. The fluid stations were good and the volunteers were very helpful. All the people involved with the marathon were very nice. Aside from the hills, I had a great time.
|
Peaceful, scenic course (about: 2004)
Course: 4
Organization: 5
Fans: 2
t. a. from asheville north carolina (4/19/04)
1 previous marathon
| 1 Charlottesville Marathon
Some very challenging hills, where all of the runners that I saw were walking. Overall, a great run.
|
Why to avoid for-profit marathons (about: 2004)
Course: 1
Organization: 1
Fans: 3
Runner Chick from Washington, DC (4/19/04)
1 previous marathon
Given the high registration cost, I was disappointed that you really don't get anything for it. No race expo, you must pick up your packet the night before (thus requiring you to stay overnight, even if you only live in Richmond/DC a few hours away), no anything other than a bib and a T-shirt. The race is not chip-timed. There were ~400 marathoners this year and ~1,000 half-marathoners. I did the half, which is the same course with an earlier turn-around point.
A real marathon representing the city would take the course through the scenic UVA campus. I can take a drive into the country to get this scenery just as easily. The water stations are insufficient for a marathon-length (~4 oz. cups of water every 2-3 miles), no bathrooms. Insufficient info about where they'll have gels/other replenishment - I didn't know whether it would be on the half course or just the marathon, and at what mile (there was none on the half course).
You have to share the road with traffic much of the way, and although the police did a good job giving runners right-of-way, there were some segments where the runners and cars were clearly confused about who should go on which side and you kind of had to dodge slow-moving traffic. For the last ~4 miles runners don't even get a whole lane, they have a coned-in makeshift lane about 2-3 feet wide, on the road right next to cars moving the same direction. Later finishers may have to dodge pedestrians, as the finishing segment goes through the downtown mall area and people are walking all across the course.
I won't do this race again.
|
Not well thought out or planned (about: 2004)
Course: 2
Organization: 2
Fans: 1
E. G. from Marshall Virginia (4/18/04)
3 previous marathons
| 1 Charlottesville Marathon
I ran this race for the first time and it may be the last if the director doesn't see to the desparately needed changes.
The course is difficult but what people needed to know is where the long and steep hills are along the course; they are at the 5, 14, 19, 21, and 23 mile points. There was little to no crowd support and once you leave the town there is no crowd support. Scenery was beautiful and the volunteers are fabulous but with the heat, the water stations were too far apart, and that made for an extremely difficult race.
All of those who ran were very friendly and supportive but many became defeated and broken-hearted; not why we run marathons!
I am hopeful that things will change for next year. Considering the price we paid and those who had additional travel expenses, there should have been much more offered.
The finisher's medal left a lot to be desired...
|
Beautiful course -- poorly organized for walkers! (about: 2004)
Course: 3
Organization: 2
Fans: 5
Christina Tomlinson from Washington, D.C. (4/18/04)
1 previous marathon
| 1 Charlottesville Marathon
I walked the '04 Charlottesville Half-Marathon. The course is gorgeous, the water breaks came religiously every 2 miles, the fans were great, and I didn't even mind the hills. But the sweep car deserted the walkers on the first mile -- we had to get a police car to radio ahead. And I'm positive the distance wasn't marked correctly -- the distance between mile posts six and seven was much greater than a mile, meaning the half marathon ended up being closer to 14 miles than 13. If they could fix that and get better organized for walkers, I'd do it again next year.
|
Beautiful and Challenging Course (about: 2004)
Course: 5
Organization: 3
Fans: 2
K. H. from Washington, D.C. (4/17/04)
1 previous marathon
| 1 Charlottesville Marathon
I ran the half-marathon in 2004. The weather was great and the course is the most beautiful course I have ever seen. Quite challenging. The ascents are difficult if you are not prepared for them, but the amount of descents make up for it. Course takes you past the University of Virginia and along beautiful country roads with a scenic view of the mountains. Course ended in the historic downtown area. Charming city and a fun race.
Great medal for all finishers. Only problem was not enough bathrooms at the starting line. Not a lot of spectators because so much of the course is along country roads. I heard there were a few glitches in last year's event, but I think the organizers took care of most of them this year.
|
Not a Boston Qualifier (about: 2004)
Course: 3
Organization: 1
Fans: 3
M. S. from VA (2/29/04)
6-10 previous marathons
Anyone running the race in 2004, note that this is not a USATF certified course. On the race website, it is claimed to be a USATF sanctioned event. Do not confuse this with a certified course. If you are looking to qualify for Boston, this is not the race for you. You need to run a USATF certified course otherwise you will be disappointed.
|
No bathrooms, no bag check, no food (about: 2003)
Course: 2
Organization: 1
Fans: 1
C. T. from Washington, DC (11/20/03)
I was very excited about this race (I ran the half), but cooled down quickly once I had to stand around for over an hour waiting for the start. The organizers provided no cover to stand out of the rain, and runners had to stand shivering until the winery decided to open its doors to let us in. Cars were parked one mile away, up a very steep muddy hill, and there was no bag check. There were no bathrooms along the route at all, and everyone was just expected to climb into the woods (over barbed wire in some instances) to go. Then, at the end, they were selling food from one of the race sponsors -- what exactly were they sponsoring if they didn't provide food? There was really no area for spectators, but that was due in part to the rural nature of the race.
The scenery was outstanding and the medals were beautiful, but the course was described as 'sloping hills' -- more like straight up and down, over gravel for a good portion of it. AND there were cars all over the course, on very winding roads with no shoulders. I saw one woman almost struck by a pick-up truck, until she jumped off the side of the road to avoid the collision. The organizers were way out of their league, first time or not -- this was one of the most poorly organized events I have ever attended, out of 17 priors.
|
The hills just never ended (about: 2003)
Course: 3
Organization: 2
Fans: 3
J. S. from Centreville, VA (11/6/03)
It was a long frustrating day. 'Rolling hills' seemed to get bigger and bigger as the day went on. Never got into a steady stride or pace. Never got comfortable. Hardest of my 9 marathons, 20 minutes slower than my 2 marathons before and one since. Would love to see an elevation profile!
Organization had some snafus, but not unexpected for an inaugural.
Crowds were sparse, as in 1-2 people every few miles (not counting start/finish and water stops), but friendly.
If you're into trail runs, you'll love it. If you're after a PR, you'll have a long day.
|
A very scenic and very difficult course (about: 2003)
Course: 3
Organization: 2
Fans: 2
R. F. from Glen Allen, Va (7/26/03)
I enjoyed the beautiful scenery of this course, but have never run a course this difficult. The ascents are constant and the descents often too steep to provide any relief. There were bad problems with parking that need to be corrected in year 2. Also, not such a great job of separating traffic from runners, especially at the finish line.
|
| More Comments: [ < 1 .. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > ] |
| |
|
|


|