Message Category: New!: First-Timers/Wannabes
Topic: ok-stupid newbie question

Reply: From: Date:	20 and 40 minutes are great benchmarks if your 50 years old Ed G 11/14/03 2:30:44 PM ET
I'll be fifty next September and I can run a 5k in 20 minutes and a 10K in 42 minutes. a person training for a marthon in thier thirties or younger should have no problem running a 5k in 18:30 or less and a 10K in under 40. Heck, if you can't do that you might as well be walking alongside north. Post a reply on the Bulletin Board
Message thread: ok-stupid newbie question - [steve 11/9/03 1:11:54 AM ET] Metric Conversion - [SMP 11/9/03 6:00:23 AM ET] thanks-but... - [steve 11/9/03 11:12:30 AM ET] typically... - [North 11/9/03 1:19:10 PM ET] 20 and 40 mins -- maybe not the average - [Run42 11/11/03 1:26:54 PM ET] Not even in the ballpark - [22KR 11/11/03 3:29:17 PM ET] Steve asked - [North 11/11/03 5:05:13 PM ET] 20 minute and 40 minute finishers - [Carnie 11/12/03 1:51:46 PM ET] True... and not true - [North 11/12/03 2:12:26 PM ET] Are you softening with age North? - [Run42 11/12/03 9:33:33 PM ET] Slow = bad. Fast = good? - [Zeke 11/12/03 10:36:27 PM ET] an update - [steve 11/13/03 9:50:45 AM ET] You're right Zeke - [North 11/13/03 11:38:52 AM ET] 20 and 40 minutes are great benchmarks if your 50 years old - [Ed G 11/14/03 2:30:44 PM ET] EdG - [North 11/14/03 4:25:52 PM ET] you did have a sidekick.... - [Ed G 11/14/03 4:36:07 PM ET] maybe SMP - [North 11/14/03 4:57:24 PM ET] Ed G - [Zeke 11/14/03 10:01:03 PM ET] Zeke... - [North 11/14/03 10:54:44 PM ET] Of course you don't get it! - [Ed G 11/15/03 7:17:36 AM ET] I'm not so sure... - [North 11/15/03 9:29:13 AM ET]

Back to Bulletin Boards Main Page