MarathonGuide.com Logo - Marathon Directory, Marathons, Marathon Results, News and More Click Here: Please visit our Sponsor Contact Us
Tell a Friend

Site Map
May 23, 2013
 Running Community

 Bulletin Boards
Bulletin Boards -> New!: First-Timers/Wannabes -> 16 weeks for half or full?

Message Category: New!: First-Timers/Wannabes
Topic: 16 weeks for half or full?
Reply:
From:
Date:
Why rush things?
cjrt
8/19/07 4:45:26 PM ET

Unless you have some specific reason for wanting to do a marathon right now, with that type of base you are likely better off doing a good half. There will be lots of years in which you could run a marathon, and it doesn't need to be a "beat yourself up" exercise.

The one thing which particularly argues for being moderate is that you were recently hurting. Accelerating to get up to marathon training distance is more likely to renew the injury. Since the objective should be to enjoy long distance running and to make it a regular part of your life, why risk things when the only effect would be to allow you to do the marathon six or seven months earlier?

If you really want to be sensible, run a half this fall and then look to do something in the range of 25 to 30 kilometres next spring. (These aren't common distances but they are fun. Mamilton, Ontario, has a 30 km "Around the Bay" run which claims to be the oldest annual road race in North America. It predates the Boston marathon by a couple of years.) If you respond well to the longer distance, then train for an autumn marathon.

Message thread:

Back to Bulletin Boards Main Page   


 

Bookmark and Share
 Some Ads










Like MarathonGuide.com on Facebook

Follow @MarathonGdotcom on Twitter


All material Copyright ©2000-2013 Web Marketing Associates (WMA). All rights Reserved.
Please Contact Us for more information.

WMA makes no representations as to the accuracy of information on this site or its suitability for any use. | privacy policy | refund policy